Can the party avoid tearing each-other's throat out? Can they successfully complete the dungeon and rid Port Barry of the giant glass octahedron that sits motionless a short way off the docks? Will GM have an aneurysm from it all?
Welcome back to the Nuts RP thread, where new faggots (players) are always welcome and previous faggots interact based increasingly loosely on D&D 3.5e core rules.
This thread begins with Thez completing a marvelous and unplanned concert now that she can cast "Dancing lights!" again, and a large crowd has formed around the square, where both Infernius and Trump appear to be intending to address the crowd, Thez having vacated the impromptu stage with several bouquets of flowers and adoring cheers from the crowd.
She has obscene skill pertaining to "Perform"
1780 replies and 201 files omitted.
How she got the wagon is still subject to best shitpost
>>53596Okay, then I will bitch back, for fun
>>53598It literally never needed to be stated
>>53599Yes, but if it was merchants that would please Elway and the Fuhrer
K, gotta go
Don't do anything that makes me want to blow characters up when I get back ^_^
>>53598She got it from a horde of kobolds, who themselves just stole it from a troupe of happy merchants, led by some jerk named Barry.
She chopped up the bodies into fertilizer with expert skill, and buried them beneath a grove of young pine saplings, with the help of a few young dryads, who were glad to receive the resource for their trees.
>>53598Tracy killed a caravan of 40 happy merchants, only to realize that it wasn't big enough.
Hitler noticed this sacrifice of happy merchants, and bestowed a larger wagon to her, because he likes ignoring Infernius
Is Infernius's Flamberge a 1 handed weapon or a two-handed weapon?
>>53606It's a Zweihänder type, right?
>>53606Well, the name of the weapon literally means "double handed sword, " and when I saw GM roll dice for it once it was the same as for a greatsword
>>53610Just making sure it was a Zweihänder, and not a rapier-type Flamberg. They come in all shapes and sizes.
*channels divegrass energy*
>provoke
Learn to handle the bantz.
Also, if you have something to say, say it on the thread.
>>53613Is everything bantz to you? I actually do care about the fictional world and the characters. Is that so wrong?
>>53614>Is everything bantz to you?As far as offscreen irrelevant/ambiguous action goes, yes it is.
>I actually careTracy doesn't though.
>>53615Tracy is nothing more than a figment of your imagination. She has no will or wants of her own, and no actions besides those you command. Can you please have some respect?
>>53616Tracy is canonically a serial/spree killer. Her single most consistent character-defining trait is that she mortally stabs people/ponies at random, for seemingly no reason at all. If she had the opportunity to kill a bunch of merchants every once in a while, she would, and she'd do it for no other reason than that she wanted to.
>>53617I knew it! There was another shooter. The secrets that Kennedy knew and wanted to tell us was that Equestria is real and how we can get to it.
>>53617So you're telling me that because the source you stole the concept from has her as a 1 dimensional character who is shit for a serious campaign, you feel compelled to play a 1 dimensional character who is shit for a serious campaign
>>53620Just develop a character and don't be constrained by the source materials
>>53621I mean a campaign where you can actually give a shit about what goes on in the world
>>53621Unironically this.
Nothing about this campaign has been even close to serious. Tracy killing hypothetical NPCs is not the leading cause of that.
>>53622These.
Develop tracy into a 3 dieminsional character like Infernuis.
>>53622>develop a characterI am. I'm developing a NE serial/spree killer who kills things whenever she can get away with it, because she's eevil and criminally insane. Killing irrelevant merchants for no reason is part of that character development.
>>53624She'll still be a serioal killer though, that's not about to change.
She could use some development though. Sometimes I feel like I'm playing a side-character, because she doesn't have very many motives/ambitions.
>>53625Can you please not?
>>53626You are playing a side character, because you think that "lol kill low level NPC lul" is a character
>>53626Im not asking you to change that.
Im asking you to make her 3D
>>53626I need get her working on that guild. I think the mine beneath crumbling remains of Durpistan would be a great location for an ebil organization.
I also want to put her on the path to rediscovering her abilities.
>>53629I dont think that would be a good place for it. Because we need to harvest the metal.
>>53629There are 1000 places to take this character. Why must you take her the *only* way that causes conflict, *and* is entirely non-helpful to the story as developed thus far?
>>53630>we need to harvest the metalCan't Tracy oversee the miners? I thought that'd make a great cover for the guild, since that'd give reason for people going in/out of the tunnel.
>>53632Because the purpose of the party in the larger story is to strike against the evil forces that are threatening the world. With that you're deliberately harming the people we (and especially I) are trying to protect and develop and build with. It conflicts certainly with my character goals
>>53634>purpose of the partyI don't remember signing onto one of those. I just saw that it'd be bloody.
>fight ebilYou don't have to be good to fight ebil.
>trying to protectYou don't need to protect the happy merchants on their way to the port.
>>53635>happy merchantsYou have zero intent for it to be happy merchants
>to fight evilYour character is so 1 dimensional that she has no established motivation to fight evil
>Don't remember signing one of thoseBecause you literally decided in *January* that this was your goal with the character. It is not what you started with
>>53631Ah, nerd bickering. I just thought up this weird idea... this may be crazy and I have no idea if it would work...
set up your own role play with specific rules fun sucking fag I mean, really? Complaining this much about someone isn’t going to help either one of you enjoy anything out of this, just form your own session if you need everyone to conform. Otherwise, learn to work with the player, such as an in-character dialogue to try and end what you find problematic though reason or action. And it will give you that character depth your drooling over. >>53637THE NEW POSTER SPEAKS TRUTH, HOLY SHIT
>>53633I suppose, you would need to give Infernuis a good reason for you to oversee it.
>>53637Who are you?
>>53637Nigger I've been here six months. Who the fuck are you?
>>53638Thank you my good sir. I enjoy watching what you guys get into now and again, but I never really have had time to join one of these, nor do I think I would be good at it.
>>53636>she has no established motivation to fight evilWell, it's implied she wants to steal things and find an excuse to chop plp up, but yes, I'll admit that she hasn't really had very many motivations to fight anyone she's met so far. I also did my best to illustrate her motivation to finish-off Soros, for the sake of her own powers.
>>53641You never know, most of us didn't think we would be good. Its really fun desu.
>>53642Why would she want powers? The source character has no interests in powers
>>53641Didn't know we had lurkers.
You're welcome to join anytime, if you'd wish. We're not so great at it either.
>>53641>we actually have a lurkerYou have made me happy Anon.
>nor do I think I would be good at it.Truth be told, I knew nothing about any RPG when I started, and when I look back at old threads I realize how fucking terrible I was. My point? Anyone can do this shit. It's just shitposting with dice and math. >>53643I might sometime, but school is killing me this semester. If I can catch a break one day for a longer period, I might see if you guys will put up with a noob such as myself.
>>53645>>53646Thanks. I will definitely try when I find the time.