Updates on the situation:
So, the allegedly raped accuser's answering questions on Xitter, and has been doing so since 2nd of May.
Here's how it has went for her so far:
>Can't share any strong proof without leaking identity>Conveniently can't show con badges because they were "thrown out 5 years ago">Does have a screenshot of emails supposedly confirming she's been to Canterlot GardensLet's stop for a moment here. I reread the initial testimony just to be sure, and look at that, it doesn't mention the two conventions that the rape allegedly took place by name. Quite an interesting detail to omit.
Anyway, it should be kept in mind that a screenshot like this isn't exactly hard to fake. Not saying nor implying that it is, but still.
(Just remembered to say: writing an email to a con and actually going to it are two different things)
>Shows that SS visited Equestria LAThis is implied to be the second convention. She also happens to say that "actually, that second time was in 2012 as well, not 2013". Wouldn't getting the dates as straight as possible be a major concern when writing a testimony?
>Skype messages are conveniently wiped>"We used to share a few friends and I heard through mutual people that his friend’s have told people that *I* took his virginity, which left a horrible feeling in my chest [...]"This is an interesting quote. For one, it implies a sort of contradiction which is not present here - if it was the first time for both of them, then yes, they took each other's virginities away. Additionally, the original testimony says:
<"I had never experienced any sort of sexual intimacy with someone I was not dating before"Which implies that she
did experience sexual intimacy (which may possibly entail sex) before. In fact, if she was a virgin at that time, I'm sure it would've been included in the testimony, as that would give it more weight.
In short, we have two options: either that she's putting the spotlight on something irrelevant (and arguably disadvantageous to her case), or that that bit about SS being a virgin beforehand is to be considered false.
>Misnomers SS's podcast as "The Brony Hour"Another quite interesting occurrence. While The Brony Hour is a real thing that existed at one point, it's so obscure that you can't even find archives of it, nor a single mention on 4chan. However, you
can find references to it on EQD, from where we know that 1. It was indeed made during the time period, and 2. If you were to just enter "the brony hour" into the Google search bar, all EQD results will also mention Saberspark (he was featured in one of the episodes as a guest).
For now, this is just a curiosity, nothing more. Maybe digging into it is worth it, maybe not.
>Manages to establish that she was subscribed to SS around 2012I use the word "manages" as I believe that faking the pic in question is far harder than the email one. So, at least there's that much. What's weirder is the context, as it's trying to show how Saberspark has some deleted videos - there are many easier ways to do this, a simple one is to just pull up an archive (of which there's a fair amount).
>OtherShe's given precise dates for when the two rapes (allegedly) happened: September 28th, 2012 and November 2nd, 2012. Some account with a bunch of followers on Xitter is also claiming that they know the accuser and have indeed heard this story back in 2013. This tweet has been reposted by both the accuser and BF.
All in all, not the best look. The only thing so far that has been established beyond doubt is that she had been subscribed to SS around 2012, and that SS attended Equestria LA 2012. Any hard evidence is conveniently absent or unable to be posted (Skype logs, con badges, so on). When questioned on the testimony, the accuser makes various mistakes (wrong dates, wrong podcast name, etc.), though they are quickly corrected.
As for BF himself, his response to the critics is still as aggressive as ever ("For your sake, hope Hell isn't real", "you are genuine threats to society", among others). The plan for him right now seems to be to disassociate from KP as far as possible, using appeal to emotion as well. A Youtuber named Cartoonshiシ has recently made a video going over how bad KP's vid was, and BF is saying that he wants to "talk with him", but also noting that said video was good. I suspect that he wants Cartoonshi to cover the happening more in depth, but that's just my guess.
Oh, and I just found out from a screenshot that he has a furry profile pic on Dicksword. It was to be expected by this point, but still.
...On the flipside, Saber seems to be maintaining radio silence. Judging by the comments on his most recent video, I highly suspect some are getting deleted as well. Doesn't exactly help him defend his case.
But we should not carry ourselves away. Until an official response gets made, all we can do is speculate. Maybe it'll be even worse than KP's video? Only time will tell.
Picrels: the emails supposedly confirming presence at CG; the accuser's subscriptions showing Saberspark; BF's (Bonk's) personal message to KP that he later shared.
>>25703Hello "another poster who is anonymous", I am indeed "poster who is anonymous, who could not be alleged to come from anywhere in Europe because there's no ids or flags", never thought my identity would be revealed this quickly. Should've really worked more on my OPSEC.