Welcome to the new /vx/ board - Videoganes and Paranormal! Just as mlpol was born of the merging of two wildly different topics into a single merged board, this board combines the topics of 4chans /v/, /x/, and /tg/ boards. And while /vint/ did not live on as we did, this board pays homage to the board, created and killed by an indifferent 4chan administration, in the flags that adorn this board.
As this is a new board, it does not have a firmly established set of rules. Unlike 4chan, this is a user driven site, and we are looking for user input into what the rules of this new board should be. Post your suggestions in the comments
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
9 replies and 6 files omitted.
Why does this board have flags and image IDs anyway? Neither /v/ nor /x/ had them. I guess the flags could have been in the spirit of our sister board /vint/, but /vint/ didn't have poster IDs either.
File (): 4F028E3E0ADEA7FA0DEE268585F7C060-47971.jpg (46.8 KB, 1051x906, IMG_0058.jpeg)
Continuing, and hopefully introducing new characters.
And on the wrong damn post number
And on the wrong damn post number
65 replies and 2 files omitted.
>>177076
"And that is why we do not leave little fillies in charge of collecting firewood for the winter. Keskiyon, get out here. We must be done before the wind increases."
Father looks back at Amber, as if looking for a suggestion.
"And that is why we do not leave little fillies in charge of collecting firewood for the winter. Keskiyon, get out here. We must be done before the wind increases."
Father looks back at Amber, as if looking for a suggestion.
>>177075
"If you don't trust the Blackhooves' redoubtable but certainly stretched intelligence assets, or the local police, to keep track of a single stallion, I have the will and resources to do that for you." He cocks a griffon's equivalent of an eyebrow. "Now, is there some sort of 'assurance deposit' you need?"
"If you don't trust the Blackhooves' redoubtable but certainly stretched intelligence assets, or the local police, to keep track of a single stallion, I have the will and resources to do that for you." He cocks a griffon's equivalent of an eyebrow. "Now, is there some sort of 'assurance deposit' you need?"
>>177078
"Did you have something in mind?" He asks, raising an eyebrow. "And do you know where you will be staying? Working?"
"Did you have something in mind?" He asks, raising an eyebrow. "And do you know where you will be staying? Working?"
>>177077
Poor Papa…a lynx has got his tongue. "The only way we'll need more firewood is if we keep the doors open and letting the cold in. And…" she continues, finding newfound resolve, "If you spend so much time outside you'll have to eat more food. It'll be several weeks until sunlight and we need to make sure we have enough food to last us until then. Isn't that right, Papa?"
Poor Papa…a lynx has got his tongue. "The only way we'll need more firewood is if we keep the doors open and letting the cold in. And…" she continues, finding newfound resolve, "If you spend so much time outside you'll have to eat more food. It'll be several weeks until sunlight and we need to make sure we have enough food to last us until then. Isn't that right, Papa?"
>>177079
"Two hundred bits should be plenty of 'assurance' that I won't let him out of sight. I will be staying at a local hotel for the foreseeable future.
As for work, I have received an offer from your government but I cannot disclose any more than that."
"Two hundred bits should be plenty of 'assurance' that I won't let him out of sight. I will be staying at a local hotel for the foreseeable future.
As for work, I have received an offer from your government but I cannot disclose any more than that."
File (): 2E4324648AA9FBD4F94434534FCF244E-4063524.png (3.9 MB, 2560x1440, 7020980.png)
The next big quest with everypony in it is coming soon (TM)
1821 replies and 52 files omitted.
oh, lol
File (): D3A81156549413E1A8796F1606771021-51153.jpg (50.0 KB, 631x486, images_4.jpg)
Threads about this company, Sweet Baby Inc., are being constantly moved from /v/ to /pol/.
>Sweet Baby Inc. is not the
largest narrative design company in the games industry. Nor is it solely responsible for the characters and stories in recent high-profile releases like Alan Wake 2, God of War Ragnarok, and Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. But good luck telling some gamers that.
>Though these kinds of social media posts argue that companies like Sweet Baby Inc. somehow “force” game studios to include diverse characters and storylines, the reality is vastly different. Sweet Baby Inc. is a narrative design company, meaning most of its work is focused on writing stories and dialogue—they are not a DEI consultancy firm. That means they ensure a game’s plot points make logical sense and are satisfying to players, and that characters speak and behave in consistent ways. Narrative designers may also provide a final round of polish, like a Hollywood “script doctor.” For example, the team worked on Suicide Squad long after the story was written—and even then they joined just to write in-game ads, audio logs, and NPC “barks,” CEO Kim Belair tells me over video call.
Thoughts?
https://kotaku.com/sweet-baby-inc-consulting-games-alan-wake-2-dei-1851312428
>Sweet Baby Inc. is not the
largest narrative design company in the games industry. Nor is it solely responsible for the characters and stories in recent high-profile releases like Alan Wake 2, God of War Ragnarok, and Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League. But good luck telling some gamers that.
>Though these kinds of social media posts argue that companies like Sweet Baby Inc. somehow “force” game studios to include diverse characters and storylines, the reality is vastly different. Sweet Baby Inc. is a narrative design company, meaning most of its work is focused on writing stories and dialogue—they are not a DEI consultancy firm. That means they ensure a game’s plot points make logical sense and are satisfying to players, and that characters speak and behave in consistent ways. Narrative designers may also provide a final round of polish, like a Hollywood “script doctor.” For example, the team worked on Suicide Squad long after the story was written—and even then they joined just to write in-game ads, audio logs, and NPC “barks,” CEO Kim Belair tells me over video call.
Thoughts?
https://kotaku.com/sweet-baby-inc-consulting-games-alan-wake-2-dei-1851312428
31 replies and 26 files omitted.
File (): 680179A51648B9C7DCA36A5E21CAB58A-17505.jpg (17.1 KB, 495x315, screenshot.jpg)
https://youtu.be/5_LBClYkT8E?si=8TMxs73PaMJSZNU1
Shitposting works. Sweet Baby is being cancelled by the industry.
Shitposting works. Sweet Baby is being cancelled by the industry.
https://youtu.be/spGqUWDPOkA?si=VJlD0GUCYssjSh4C
Companies are blacklisting SBI. Their involvement in games only leads to rot and ruin, and companies want none of it.
Companies are blacklisting SBI. Their involvement in games only leads to rot and ruin, and companies want none of it.
>>176727
It seems like good news, but It'll likely result in the utilization of SBI-like services and philosophies being kept secret. SBI's biggest mistake wqas bragging about their involvement and likely making companies do the same as part of their contract. They can still intervene with creative works while now making their ideas appear grassroots by integrating silently
It seems like good news, but It'll likely result in the utilization of SBI-like services and philosophies being kept secret. SBI's biggest mistake wqas bragging about their involvement and likely making companies do the same as part of their contract. They can still intervene with creative works while now making their ideas appear grassroots by integrating silently
>>176737
>It'll likely result in the utilization of SBI-like services and philosophies being kept secret. SBI's biggest mistake wqas bragging about their involvement and likely making companies do the same as part of their contract
SBI got as large as it did by threatening game companies with public scandal if they didn't comply with their demands. They wouldn't be able to do the same thing in secret.
Nevertheless, stay vigilant.
>It'll likely result in the utilization of SBI-like services and philosophies being kept secret. SBI's biggest mistake wqas bragging about their involvement and likely making companies do the same as part of their contract
SBI got as large as it did by threatening game companies with public scandal if they didn't comply with their demands. They wouldn't be able to do the same thing in secret.
Nevertheless, stay vigilant.
File (): 2D4342A006F2AA387C4429920F1F04AE-360714.png (352.3 KB, 600x720, 1737227.png)
One of these threads.
509 replies and 349 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.174934
File (): FBCB81966951BCF7E9B3C0D91505A13F-3539373.mov (3.4 MB, Resolution:350x640 Length:00:00:56, jimmy_johns.mov) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.176100
File (): E17ABE377525274F83C3CA8BFB93929E-70112.jpg (68.5 KB, 620x614, IMG_20240912_211627.jpg)
Anonymous
No.176235
File (): 68A0BC6349E65C8EAACEEB0A05B7DDAC-1668294.mp4 (1.6 MB, Resolution:486x480 Length:00:00:39, [burialgoods] 2024_04_23 Mfer can't catch a break (480p_24fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4) [play once] [loop]
![[burialgoods] 2024_04_23 Mfer can't catch a break (480p_24fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4](/images/thumb/68A0BC6349E65C8EAACEEB0A05B7DDAC-1668294.png)
Anonymous
No.176685
File (): 1EF74FE3AACCAECE58510D12215F46AE-1953326.png (1.9 MB, 2000x2000, scrombled_wallpaper_hd.png)
Anonymous
No.176778
File (): AAF2F433B4472FB97FF9FF47612EF6B9-1118735.png (1.1 MB, 811x811, my-little-pony-fandoms-mlp-art-4499966-1216792644.png)
Lol, /mlpol/ is a lich. Its dead, but its also very alive and active and shit
Like the title says, this is a thread for any and all table top games and things related to them.
If you have a question about homebrew, worldbuilding, game mechanics ect this is the thread for it.
If you have a question about homebrew, worldbuilding, game mechanics ect this is the thread for it.
197 replies and 29 files omitted.
>>176313
The point was 'what is intelligence' as a concept not 'what is the score threshold'.
>Treating them the same way you would mindless undead
Who said that? The suggestion is that an undead creature can be BOTH: a fully/highly intelligent creature capable of learning, thinking, and otherwise displaying the many facets of consciousness AND YET still be an absurdly sophisticated automation.
Again, it comes down to perspective at that level, but it is forcing me to reevaluate my assumptions to do with the nature of life, unlife, animation, etc.
The point was 'what is intelligence' as a concept not 'what is the score threshold'.
>Treating them the same way you would mindless undead
Who said that? The suggestion is that an undead creature can be BOTH: a fully/highly intelligent creature capable of learning, thinking, and otherwise displaying the many facets of consciousness AND YET still be an absurdly sophisticated automation.
Again, it comes down to perspective at that level, but it is forcing me to reevaluate my assumptions to do with the nature of life, unlife, animation, etc.
Example:
>>176328
I would already consider a mindless skeleton to be a highly sophisticated automaton. I think the behavior of most intelligent undead demonstrates that they are self aware, free-thinking creatures. Idk though.
I really don't see what it is about the undead creature type that makes an intelligent creature an automaton. Why undead, but not humanoids, animals, dragons, fiends, celestials, fey, or other creatures? What's so different about the undead type?
I would already consider a mindless skeleton to be a highly sophisticated automaton. I think the behavior of most intelligent undead demonstrates that they are self aware, free-thinking creatures. Idk though.
I really don't see what it is about the undead creature type that makes an intelligent creature an automaton. Why undead, but not humanoids, animals, dragons, fiends, celestials, fey, or other creatures? What's so different about the undead type?
>>176331
>Why undead, but not humanoids, animals, dragons, fiends, celestials, fey, or other creatures? What's so different about the undead type?
Why indeed. Begs the question: is the erstwhile referred-to soul a form of automation/animation of a living (see atomic, cellular, organic, metaphysical, and everything else) organism?
>Why undead, but not humanoids, animals, dragons, fiends, celestials, fey, or other creatures? What's so different about the undead type?
Why indeed. Begs the question: is the erstwhile referred-to soul a form of automation/animation of a living (see atomic, cellular, organic, metaphysical, and everything else) organism?
>>176332
I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Some creatures in d&d have souls, and some don't.
Elves didn't have souls in original d&d.
I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Some creatures in d&d have souls, and some don't.
Elves didn't have souls in original d&d.
Libris Mortis says a lot about general undead psychology. It can be viewed on realmshelp.
https://www.realmshelps.net/monsters/aboutundead.shtml
https://www.realmshelps.net/monsters/aboutundead.shtml
Element of lust will be an rpg game about berry punch trying to survive in the new apocalyptic world. some previews, screenshots and other stuff will be occasionally dropped here.
138 replies and 59 files omitted.
Softie boi
No.167241
I'm fraence now.
Ok, bye.
Ok, bye.
Anonymous
No.167243
File (): 25F189AE5E2683A682A4593F53B06CF9-114764.jpg (112.1 KB, 1280x720, Mare_using_Rarity's_scream_S2E8.jpg)
Hi, this is dev speaking.
We're at a great loss today as of now the source for Element of Lust game files is gone. I've been gone for two months and by that time all my data got deleted. Could anyone of you please post it here again if you have it? The upper link is dead.
We're at a great loss today as of now the source for Element of Lust game files is gone. I've been gone for two months and by that time all my data got deleted. Could anyone of you please post it here again if you have it? The upper link is dead.
Anonymous
No.174501
>>174498
Hope someone can find a copy. I will look though what I have saved and my backups to see if I got it.
Hope someone can find a copy. I will look though what I have saved and my backups to see if I got it.
File (): C65A3155C6382A67661927C06B02CC4E-546237.png (533.4 KB, 1348x1048, 4b23a6b5607e9d77ba0029996564191f825ec9198f2640bd739fd2283c5fe24d.png)
Anonymous
No.176236
File (): F7DF3CE70BCC5D4584B529C1952BC471-116554.png (113.8 KB, 1000x1000, thinking_4.png)
I would like to discuss this topic in a proper manner because over on 4chinz the related thread is simply dogshit.
I'll start with a question from the get go.
What are the rules for manifestation? As in what can be manifested by an individual?
As there are certain things that are simply not possible to manifest therefore there is a rule set. One example would be bringing back the dead.
After reading and watching videos it looks like there is a field of possible objectives that are easy to manifest due to one's immediate circumstances/environment while more complex objectives take longer to achieve or outright impossible due to unknown reason(s).
Is there a way to determine this somehow? To find out the complexity of the wish:is it just a simple deduction of how many actions are needed to reach certain stages that lead to the desired outcome,something else?
I asked myself whether it's valid making such distinction between outcomes regarding their "complexity" or not but even in the Gateway Experience document under "Patterning", they make such a distinction.
I'll start with a question from the get go.
What are the rules for manifestation? As in what can be manifested by an individual?
As there are certain things that are simply not possible to manifest therefore there is a rule set. One example would be bringing back the dead.
After reading and watching videos it looks like there is a field of possible objectives that are easy to manifest due to one's immediate circumstances/environment while more complex objectives take longer to achieve or outright impossible due to unknown reason(s).
Is there a way to determine this somehow? To find out the complexity of the wish:is it just a simple deduction of how many actions are needed to reach certain stages that lead to the desired outcome,something else?
I asked myself whether it's valid making such distinction between outcomes regarding their "complexity" or not but even in the Gateway Experience document under "Patterning", they make such a distinction.
10 replies and 5 files omitted.
Read through the comments and i'm not really sure i can or even want to reply to them.
From my viewpoint: We are all given the chance to do whatever we want as long as it leads to a positive outcome in one way or another regarding to ourselves and/or to others.
Also i think using the principles of LOA can be achieved via different methods, prayer is one of them i would say.
And with that i'll go back to my original comment about that there are certain things that cannot be achieved therefore there are only finite amount of possibilities one can wish for. How to figure out whether what i wish for is in this realm of possibilities or not?
From my viewpoint: We are all given the chance to do whatever we want as long as it leads to a positive outcome in one way or another regarding to ourselves and/or to others.
Also i think using the principles of LOA can be achieved via different methods, prayer is one of them i would say.
And with that i'll go back to my original comment about that there are certain things that cannot be achieved therefore there are only finite amount of possibilities one can wish for. How to figure out whether what i wish for is in this realm of possibilities or not?
File (): 4A4FD01C7A0B8C2CCCA44177C51BE27D-200782.jpg (196.1 KB, 750x572, 119419.jpg)
>>174952
>And with that i'll go back to my original comment about that there are certain things that cannot be achieved therefore there are only finite amount of possibilities one can wish for.
>How to figure out whether what i wish for is in this realm of possibilities or not?
Part of it is a bootstrap problem, knowledge, wisdom, skill, experience and success.
The other part is which tool kit you use.
LOA is stripped Planetary Magic.
You send the message up to the theoretical pinnacle for the stuff to be made till it's fully manufactured, letting the various stages fill out without your direct input.
Some of the places for some requests are efficient.
Some places get into deadlocks and development hell and mismanaged fuckery.
Most of the issue is a logistics chain problem.
However by just sending the mssage (LOA) one can aquire some wisdom, knowledge, skills and experiences.
What I mean is you can do A B testing to probe what is easily doable in which timeframe without touching or changing or getting into anything else.
One of the big problems is needed transit time, part of the solution is to send the message to the past of sorts.
So we send the message outside of time and so the whatever is completed and sent at a specific chronological date.
Each person's logistics route is more or less similar, the thing is what kinds of blockages and interruptions there are.
Which brings me to the tool of choice analogy.
LOA is to an email
Planetary Magic is to a computer
Chaos magic is to a programmer
Being one with Jesus is akin to being a family business multi-megacorporations soon to be owner with everything being top of the line and subject with clear hard guidelines and I'm understateing the riches and personnel at hand.
Prayer is a fancy way of saying you're having a chat with the family and friends.
<I have a clear preference.
Before I have made it an important point to not be seen/noticed by any hostile powers, it's important. The time and energy wasted trying to deal with whatever fuckery is annoying.
It greases the wheels and makes stuff churn out smooth, making it far less dangerous.
Now it's reversed where it's technically always dangerous all the time, but all hostile forces run the fuck away as fast as possible, and everything is more smooth, safer, faster, secure and meaningful.
>And with that i'll go back to my original comment about that there are certain things that cannot be achieved therefore there are only finite amount of possibilities one can wish for.
>How to figure out whether what i wish for is in this realm of possibilities or not?
Part of it is a bootstrap problem, knowledge, wisdom, skill, experience and success.
The other part is which tool kit you use.
LOA is stripped Planetary Magic.
You send the message up to the theoretical pinnacle for the stuff to be made till it's fully manufactured, letting the various stages fill out without your direct input.
Some of the places for some requests are efficient.
Some places get into deadlocks and development hell and mismanaged fuckery.
Most of the issue is a logistics chain problem.
However by just sending the mssage (LOA) one can aquire some wisdom, knowledge, skills and experiences.
What I mean is you can do A B testing to probe what is easily doable in which timeframe without touching or changing or getting into anything else.
One of the big problems is needed transit time, part of the solution is to send the message to the past of sorts.
So we send the message outside of time and so the whatever is completed and sent at a specific chronological date.
Each person's logistics route is more or less similar, the thing is what kinds of blockages and interruptions there are.
Which brings me to the tool of choice analogy.
LOA is to an email
Planetary Magic is to a computer
Chaos magic is to a programmer
Being one with Jesus is akin to being a family business multi-megacorporations soon to be owner with everything being top of the line and subject with clear hard guidelines and I'm understateing the riches and personnel at hand.
Prayer is a fancy way of saying you're having a chat with the family and friends.
<I have a clear preference.
Before I have made it an important point to not be seen/noticed by any hostile powers, it's important. The time and energy wasted trying to deal with whatever fuckery is annoying.
It greases the wheels and makes stuff churn out smooth, making it far less dangerous.
Now it's reversed where it's technically always dangerous all the time, but all hostile forces run the fuck away as fast as possible, and everything is more smooth, safer, faster, secure and meaningful.
>>174953
Okay. Now how does taking an action toward the wish affect the whole process so to speak? Is it required to take action toward the wish,does it depend on the wish itself?
As in my mind i believe getting from current point to another one can be done via many ways.
1)I'm just waiting for the wish to be fulfilled one way or another.
2)I take action to move from current state to another state that's "closer(or perhaps further)" to the end and while doing so i might even shorten the route/time required to fulfill the wish and my action might even make it easier to happen.
And the way you described it,my thinking kind of matches to the logistics chain problem.
There are points/states and to get from one to another an action is needed. So by doing an action i can jump to a state in this chain,whether that's a good thing or not is another question.
However doing "nothing" could count as well depending on the wish?
>You send the message up
It sounds like i can send a badly written message(thus getting something different/bad) if not done correctly?IF i can even write the message to begin with.
Okay. Now how does taking an action toward the wish affect the whole process so to speak? Is it required to take action toward the wish,does it depend on the wish itself?
As in my mind i believe getting from current point to another one can be done via many ways.
1)I'm just waiting for the wish to be fulfilled one way or another.
2)I take action to move from current state to another state that's "closer(or perhaps further)" to the end and while doing so i might even shorten the route/time required to fulfill the wish and my action might even make it easier to happen.
And the way you described it,my thinking kind of matches to the logistics chain problem.
There are points/states and to get from one to another an action is needed. So by doing an action i can jump to a state in this chain,whether that's a good thing or not is another question.
However doing "nothing" could count as well depending on the wish?
>You send the message up
It sounds like i can send a badly written message(thus getting something different/bad) if not done correctly?IF i can even write the message to begin with.
>>174954
>The post.
Sorry, I wrote an hour long post about what I've done in the past, but I was corrected.
The too long didn't read, is that the only good GOD allows all to enjoy things nobody deserves.
That includes what is termed magic or LOA wishes.
As such if you ask Him, He heard you and then created everything from the beginning. Because He is beyond the flimsy grasp of time, so too all messages He listens to.
I strongly recommend accepting what Jesus has done to repair the relationship between everyone and The only living God.
If you want to listen to my previously dead shell visit the early/medium parts of the /vx/ thread.
It's not worth it, because He's more than enough. It's better to have the best relationship with Him, than to slave away with bits and pieces that can't last.
With The Holy Ghost He assists in being perfect. Messages that would be a jumbled mess are course corrected to be how God desires.
You get every promise God made, and you can talk with the creator of everything including you at all times.
The difference between God and LoA is too vast to even compare.
He lives you, and wants you know He's taking care of it.
>The post.
Sorry, I wrote an hour long post about what I've done in the past, but I was corrected.
The too long didn't read, is that the only good GOD allows all to enjoy things nobody deserves.
That includes what is termed magic or LOA wishes.
As such if you ask Him, He heard you and then created everything from the beginning. Because He is beyond the flimsy grasp of time, so too all messages He listens to.
I strongly recommend accepting what Jesus has done to repair the relationship between everyone and The only living God.
If you want to listen to my previously dead shell visit the early/medium parts of the /vx/ thread.
It's not worth it, because He's more than enough. It's better to have the best relationship with Him, than to slave away with bits and pieces that can't last.
With The Holy Ghost He assists in being perfect. Messages that would be a jumbled mess are course corrected to be how God desires.
You get every promise God made, and you can talk with the creator of everything including you at all times.
The difference between God and LoA is too vast to even compare.
He lives you, and wants you know He's taking care of it.
No offense to OP, but at a certain point one can learn to stop asking, knowing - much as one who prays does - that through their choices/behavior they will experience precisely the circumstances, people, and context that will best manifest their best-suited development.
Imo, the best 'prayer' is a song that doesnt involve words; when sung properly, its difficult not to cry, especially in he 3rd verse (the song is Amazing Grace, done in harmonic tuvanese throat singing). The song reminds me how deeply and emphatically I love God. I am grateful for God's ever-presence, I would long have given into permanent foolishness long ago without. Its really hard to think about what you dont have when youre reminded that,... you get what Im saying.
Imo, the best 'prayer' is a song that doesnt involve words; when sung properly, its difficult not to cry, especially in he 3rd verse (the song is Amazing Grace, done in harmonic tuvanese throat singing). The song reminds me how deeply and emphatically I love God. I am grateful for God's ever-presence, I would long have given into permanent foolishness long ago without. Its really hard to think about what you dont have when youre reminded that,... you get what Im saying.
>>174919
Hi. I'm wandering around, wondering where my /fringe/ homies have gone (the board is shit nowadays). I'm just a wandering schizo.
>what are the rules of manifestation
Manifestation works differently to how it is represented most of the time. Neville nailed the how, but nobody really explains the why, and some questions require you to answer it.
The key to your question is in Swedenborg's work. Manifestation is the result of closing in the spiritual (or "moral" as Swedenborg put it) distance. That is, the more similar you can feel to how you want it to be, the more like that it will become.
You can figure out how probable something is to manifest by gauging how easy it is for you to feel it is real. Then things take the path of least resistance to make that short distance you made symbolical to make it literal.
>bring back the dead
If you apply the above, you will see how this one is tricky. You can enter a trance (not really necessary if you are really adept), and spend an hour shifting your feeling to feel as if the person you want to bring back was in front of you, alive, talking to you. The path of least resistance to this will be a more-real-than-real dream experience in which you are with that person, or a mediumistic experience in which you see them. Technically, your feeling became realized (it was always "real"). But you didn't resurrect anyone.
I suppose you could come up with a completely unambiguous, layered "feel" that implied actual resurrection, and didn't allow for any substitute for a literal raising of the dead. But how real would you be able to feel it?
Hi. I'm wandering around, wondering where my /fringe/ homies have gone (the board is shit nowadays). I'm just a wandering schizo.
>what are the rules of manifestation
Manifestation works differently to how it is represented most of the time. Neville nailed the how, but nobody really explains the why, and some questions require you to answer it.
The key to your question is in Swedenborg's work. Manifestation is the result of closing in the spiritual (or "moral" as Swedenborg put it) distance. That is, the more similar you can feel to how you want it to be, the more like that it will become.
You can figure out how probable something is to manifest by gauging how easy it is for you to feel it is real. Then things take the path of least resistance to make that short distance you made symbolical to make it literal.
>bring back the dead
If you apply the above, you will see how this one is tricky. You can enter a trance (not really necessary if you are really adept), and spend an hour shifting your feeling to feel as if the person you want to bring back was in front of you, alive, talking to you. The path of least resistance to this will be a more-real-than-real dream experience in which you are with that person, or a mediumistic experience in which you see them. Technically, your feeling became realized (it was always "real"). But you didn't resurrect anyone.
I suppose you could come up with a completely unambiguous, layered "feel" that implied actual resurrection, and didn't allow for any substitute for a literal raising of the dead. But how real would you be able to feel it?
File (): 107DB13E2B56188F0DFDB1EA346A91CB-771519.png (753.4 KB, 791x482, walker.png)
So anyone here ever run into one? I went to HS with a few guys who said they had seen one. I live next to an Indian reservation so it made sense but anyone here ever seen one?
File (): 732466712A50AF9493772C332E21A989-434715.mp4 (424.5 KB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:26, 051db626b2774bace1a6afb188747c6867996c0d55fe2ea82416d59814ba68e0_1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
File (): CDFFC112B67501959110678FAACBC77A-231219.jpg (225.8 KB, 750x739, IMG_3485.jpg)
File (): E53F789A2BD770EF5873DA5EC2DAC007-31680.jpg (30.9 KB, 484x622, 1725649445724785.jpg)
File (): 0E1918F7A40348D1DDA18A208C15A1C5-185721.jpg (181.4 KB, 1013x767, d5x5ive-78bdb703-1bc1-4ff3-a567-55429af069ef.jpg)
File (): 71EF7A9A989BFFFA210581BF3BB7F33F-997947.jpg (974.6 KB, 4192x3870, Ninja-2~3.jpg)
What...
the...
Hey ponyfrens! Welcome to the grand re-opening of the Pony Pub, a thread I was eventually gonna get to re-bump and troll with after it hit 1000, but someone got tired of!
This is a casual thread to reference 'legitimate' threads/posts from, without derailing.
Out bartender/chef is a tulpa, and she and OP are just this side of batshit! But her food is amazing, so deal with it.
the...
Hey ponyfrens! Welcome to the grand re-opening of the Pony Pub, a thread I was eventually gonna get to re-bump and troll with after it hit 1000, but someone got tired of!
This is a casual thread to reference 'legitimate' threads/posts from, without derailing.
Out bartender/chef is a tulpa, and she and OP are just this side of batshit! But her food is amazing, so deal with it.
68 replies and 21 files omitted.
>>175657
>she briefly mutters
<Planet? The fook,...
>before focusing back on you to reply
<Naurr, ain't got none'a that, folks 'ave alwys been fiene wit booze. An' dun ye get any smart idears 'bout "cows producin' milk", Ah ain't that kinda cowe.
>her face betrays her interior dialogue, something along the lines of wondering where you think you are
>she briefly mutters
<Planet? The fook,...
>before focusing back on you to reply
<Naurr, ain't got none'a that, folks 'ave alwys been fiene wit booze. An' dun ye get any smart idears 'bout "cows producin' milk", Ah ain't that kinda cowe.
>her face betrays her interior dialogue, something along the lines of wondering where you think you are
<Cuz it'd be a roight shame if'n specific faggots were tryin' te' manufacture consensus
Again
Again
File (): C8796C741FF26943CCC54026BF11C90E-2986743.png (2.8 MB, 2160x1620, cow_farm.png)
Yay! New artwork commission just got sent!
Previous [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Next