Thus we begin the 53rd Nuts thread. There'd be more, except I've gotten lazy and won't bake until threads are ~1500 posts now.
Its an RP thread based on core D&D rules (3.5e particularly). Anyone can shitpost, comment, or play as they prefer, though making a character does require a small bit of detail.
The party is currently almost totally divided. Not on philosophical or moral grounds, they're just not in the same place at the same time. Infernius is kidnapping Trump for some reason, who was headed to check out the Sil wall, which is a concept he's only recently heard of, but will probably like.
Tracy is headed to Cardashil to stab things and (maybe) get her previous stash of knives back from.
Stix is exploring the primeval forest, intent on finding Trollestia (?), while Torcuil and Snek - when they're not attacking one another - are taking the airship to Krenshall.
Thez hasn't been seen since learning that Kefka is still (again?) alive, which she seemed most emphatically not pleased to discover.
Its mid-week, so it won't shouldn't, but probably will get hairy until later. So then, go nuts.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
1627 replies and 155 files omitted.
>>57221
Infernius should polymorph himself into an actual Minotaur, at the expense of some intelligence.
Infernius should polymorph himself into an actual Minotaur, at the expense of some intelligence.
>>57221
Here is a question:
Could an earth pony use class spells? Is that a power all characters have or only if it makes sense to have magical abilities?
Here is a question:
Could an earth pony use class spells? Is that a power all characters have or only if it makes sense to have magical abilities?
>>57223
Class spells are practices learned through the class itself: they're not limited by race, unless otherwise specified in the class description. Humans are even less magical than earth ponies (who are just as magical as unicorns or pegasi imo), and they still cast spells easily.
Class spells are practices learned through the class itself: they're not limited by race, unless otherwise specified in the class description. Humans are even less magical than earth ponies (who are just as magical as unicorns or pegasi imo), and they still cast spells easily.
>>57225
Our characters need to team up sometime then, because one of my spells can entangle enemies in plants. This can cause the enemy, if they fail to escape, to be helpless, which can be sneak attacked by rouge characters.
Our characters need to team up sometime then, because one of my spells can entangle enemies in plants. This can cause the enemy, if they fail to escape, to be helpless, which can be sneak attacked by rouge characters.
>>57226
Rangers are the best hunters and trappers, and rogues are the best at exploiting moments of weakness.
Rangers are the best hunters and trappers, and rogues are the best at exploiting moments of weakness.
File (): 45EC4B6AA7C5FB4F27AA70AF4FF4FD10-49214.jpg (48.1 KB, 736x563, 765ba460d9b3c162e62e82eb056d87a0--dungeons-and-dragons-classes-demotivational-posters.jpg)
File (): 4464AFCB9B1EEE9256A6EAEFF84743D5-61290.jpg (59.9 KB, 500x566, 14e34a2db243130781c71c0dcfbe521b.jpg)
>>57228
Nah, Wizards are when it comes to physics itself, under normal SRD rules. Sorcerers have less expensive spellcasting, and can more easily cast their favorite spells.
Sorcerors are pretty limited in their casting ability, and don't get any of the bonus feats or skills that wizards do, and being Char-based instead of Int-based, they normally don't have the same skill points (particularly knowledge-based ones) that a wizard could for epic-level spellcasting that spits in the eye of physics, and also for crafting machinery and constructs. Given the resources and time, a wizard can do pretty much anything.
The benefit to being a sorcerer is simple starting age, and the ability to cast known spells without preparation, and not having to buy and carry around a shitload of materials and focus objects (which all cost money). They also are better at multiclassing in classes like archmage or eldritch knight once they've decided the handful of spells they like the most and applied the feats to buff them, and even better if sorcerer is the favored class for their race. At the same time, they aren't royally fucked if someone sunders their spellbook, like a wizard would be. Also, Sorcerers get to start at adult age, while wizards are always old men.
All in all, wizards have the most magical potential, but sorcerers have the most convenient magic.
Nah, Wizards are when it comes to physics itself, under normal SRD rules. Sorcerers have less expensive spellcasting, and can more easily cast their favorite spells.
Sorcerors are pretty limited in their casting ability, and don't get any of the bonus feats or skills that wizards do, and being Char-based instead of Int-based, they normally don't have the same skill points (particularly knowledge-based ones) that a wizard could for epic-level spellcasting that spits in the eye of physics, and also for crafting machinery and constructs. Given the resources and time, a wizard can do pretty much anything.
The benefit to being a sorcerer is simple starting age, and the ability to cast known spells without preparation, and not having to buy and carry around a shitload of materials and focus objects (which all cost money). They also are better at multiclassing in classes like archmage or eldritch knight once they've decided the handful of spells they like the most and applied the feats to buff them, and even better if sorcerer is the favored class for their race. At the same time, they aren't royally fucked if someone sunders their spellbook, like a wizard would be. Also, Sorcerers get to start at adult age, while wizards are always old men.
All in all, wizards have the most magical potential, but sorcerers have the most convenient magic.
>>57229
Don't forget the fact the sorcerers can actually use weapons, so they aren't completely if they can't use magic for some reason.
Luckily Torc has high INT anyway
Don't forget the fact the sorcerers can actually use weapons, so they aren't completely if they can't use magic for some reason.
Luckily Torc has high INT anyway
>>57230
Well, their base attack bonus is only half their hit dice for humanoids and fey, so they usually don't land hits very well.
Battle-sorcerers would usually take martial weapon proficiency at early level, and then level up as eldritch knight to get more hit point, and apply still-feats to their favorite spells to use them in closer combat or with armor.
Did you ever take exotic weapon proficiency in those guns btw?
Well, their base attack bonus is only half their hit dice for humanoids and fey, so they usually don't land hits very well.
Battle-sorcerers would usually take martial weapon proficiency at early level, and then level up as eldritch knight to get more hit point, and apply still-feats to their favorite spells to use them in closer combat or with armor.
Did you ever take exotic weapon proficiency in those guns btw?
>>57230
I wish my character's mental stats rolled out a bit higher.. At least her Dex turned out fine, which was lucky, but I'll have little chance to exploit any of those epic-level blackguard feats.
I wish my character's mental stats rolled out a bit higher.. At least her Dex turned out fine, which was lucky, but I'll have little chance to exploit any of those epic-level blackguard feats.
>>57242
>why for ponies
So I can figure out which bane weapons to make, among other reasons.
>why for Infernius
He said he wanted moar Str.
Monstrous humanoids have base higher attack bonus too.
Does barding have the same encumbrance rules as armor, in terms of dexterity penalties?
>why for ponies
So I can figure out which bane weapons to make, among other reasons.
>why for Infernius
He said he wanted moar Str.
Monstrous humanoids have base higher attack bonus too.
Does barding have the same encumbrance rules as armor, in terms of dexterity penalties?
>>57245
>dex penalties
Precisely
>Infernius
I suppose that makes a certain sense,... but he's already absurdly strong
>dex penalties
Precisely
>Infernius
I suppose that makes a certain sense,... but he's already absurdly strong
>>57248
>Absurdly strong
Not absurd enough.
Also, if you could change yourself into a creature that looks exactly like you but has higher physical stats, why wouldn't you?
>Absurdly strong
Not absurd enough.
Also, if you could change yourself into a creature that looks exactly like you but has higher physical stats, why wouldn't you?
>>57242
I just read in the D&D wiki that rogues get to sneak attack the enemy, everyone else can coup de grace
I just read in the D&D wiki that rogues get to sneak attack the enemy, everyone else can coup de grace
>>57252
"I don't think that's what GM meant by "colorful." Different colors of clothing, not different shades of brown"
"I don't think that's what GM meant by "colorful." Different colors of clothing, not different shades of brown"
>>57251
Dealing a coup de grace provokes an attack of opportunity. A Sneak Attack is a regular attack during times that the enemy has been deprived of their dexterity bonus, caught off guard, flat-footed, unaware, etc.
It doesn't say that rogues can't.
Dealing a coup de grace provokes an attack of opportunity. A Sneak Attack is a regular attack during times that the enemy has been deprived of their dexterity bonus, caught off guard, flat-footed, unaware, etc.
It doesn't say that rogues can't.
*runs in circles*
>>57254
*shrugs*
The option to sneak attack doesn’t leave you open for the coup de grace’s penalty of enemies get attack of opportunity? I don’t know D&D, so I can’t answer for sure.
*shrugs*
The option to sneak attack doesn’t leave you open for the coup de grace’s penalty of enemies get attack of opportunity? I don’t know D&D, so I can’t answer for sure.
>>57254
No, they get to kill. It's just that they deal one hell of a lot more damage, almost insuring the thing will die, and if it doesn't, it deals a hell of a lot more damage on a successful fort save
No, they get to kill. It's just that they deal one hell of a lot more damage, almost insuring the thing will die, and if it doesn't, it deals a hell of a lot more damage on a successful fort save
>>57259
Coup de grace is not an instant kill. It's damage, and then the enemy must make a fortitude save with the DC being the damage done, or it dies. Because a Rogue does like six times as much damage, they have a much higher chance of actually killing the thing
Coup de grace is not an instant kill. It's damage, and then the enemy must make a fortitude save with the DC being the damage done, or it dies. Because a Rogue does like six times as much damage, they have a much higher chance of actually killing the thing
File (): 745F4576CE73F218D5D46F3BD50C6A79-212257.png (207.3 KB, 1024x795, fencing1203-1024x795.png)
[1d20 = 12]
Rolling to develop the Vanguard Feint (strike) maneuver.
Rolling to develop the Vanguard Feint (strike) maneuver.
>>57261
Dude, fucking stop this cancer. It was awful when Infernius started it, and it's not any better when you continue it
Dude, fucking stop this cancer. It was awful when Infernius started it, and it's not any better when you continue it
>>57263
It's from the same set as the Thousand Swords Bulwark (Army of One); a first level maneuver.
In a standard action, you can use Intimidate instead of Bluff to feint an attack. Roll your target's save as you would with Intimidate.
It's from the same set as the Thousand Swords Bulwark (Army of One); a first level maneuver.
In a standard action, you can use Intimidate instead of Bluff to feint an attack. Roll your target's save as you would with Intimidate.
>>57264
This is the discipline, btw.
https://dnd-wiki.org/wiki/Army_of_One_(3.5e_Martial_Discipline)
It's based on Intimidate.
This is the discipline, btw.
https://dnd-wiki.org/wiki/Army_of_One_(3.5e_Martial_Discipline)
It's based on Intimidate.
>>57266
Wouldn’t it take several months of training normally?
Hey, GM, why not limit these sorts of things to be learned in some kind of temple or training hall in some cities? That way no one can instantly gain new powers on you and it gives reasons to travel when players are bored.
Wouldn’t it take several months of training normally?
Hey, GM, why not limit these sorts of things to be learned in some kind of temple or training hall in some cities? That way no one can instantly gain new powers on you and it gives reasons to travel when players are bored.
>>57269
And you wouldn’t just roll to get it. You will have to talk to the monks and go on some kind of mini-quest to gain the power. Like go into the sacred cave to find the answers inside of you (by that I mean wait until you fight a shadow version of yourself). It would spice things up in my opinion.
And you wouldn’t just roll to get it. You will have to talk to the monks and go on some kind of mini-quest to gain the power. Like go into the sacred cave to find the answers inside of you (by that I mean wait until you fight a shadow version of yourself). It would spice things up in my opinion.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1677] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
1677 replies | 159 files | 22 UUIDs | Page 33