This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
2750 replies and 1410 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.174163
>>174146
Glad to hear you're okay, quite a few people have been dropping out of touch.
>174161
>a sanity
>uncivil, rude, non-constructive, blah blah blah.
>intellectualize their "feelings',
>it is not actually my shitposting what bothers them
>my persona
>persona
I mean to have the capability of understanding that you're acting like a real nigger,
disregarding all rules,
refusing education,
being offended that others have a problem with that,
demanding gibs me dats,
demanding showing off,
garbage graffiti trying to mark territory,
I dindu nuffin.
Truely you've shown a nigga moment.
I'm sorry, but I'm afraid your condition is terminal seek God. Only He can help you now.
Glad to hear you're okay, quite a few people have been dropping out of touch.
>174161
>a sanity
>uncivil, rude, non-constructive, blah blah blah.
>intellectualize their "feelings',
>it is not actually my shitposting what bothers them
>my persona
>persona
I mean to have the capability of understanding that you're acting like a real nigger,
disregarding all rules,
refusing education,
being offended that others have a problem with that,
demanding gibs me dats,
demanding showing off,
garbage graffiti trying to mark territory,
I dindu nuffin.
Truely you've shown a nigga moment.
I'm sorry, but I'm afraid your condition is terminal seek God. Only He can help you now.
>174161
>splatter the site with low quality shitposting
>throw a massive tantrum when called out on it
>start claiming persecution and bullying when the entire site turns against you
>repeat cycle until driven off the site
>continue lurking in case anyone talks about you
Congratulations, you are officially the new Nigel.
>splatter the site with low quality shitposting
>throw a massive tantrum when called out on it
>start claiming persecution and bullying when the entire site turns against you
>repeat cycle until driven off the site
>continue lurking in case anyone talks about you
Congratulations, you are officially the new Nigel.
>>174146
You are dead fucking wrong. (They) should've banned him, amongst a dozen other shitniggers, from the ghetto-go, when the complaints started piling up.
>>174158
All of you cucked out, as per usual. Which is perfect knowing that PRECISE SAME CUCKING OUT happened when the (((Gloryhole))) 1/4 kikegoy, the 4cuckoid Anun, the LITERALIST AUTHORITARIAN-COMMIE TANKIE BUTTBRUTHERZ, sockbrates, Niggel, and that insufferable half-kike, half-nigger, all UN lover from June of last year.
All of them had abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING in the means of intellectual dialogue or dialect to share, instead spouting zuckthecuckerboierg fakebawk memes, long kvetching rants from (((Mao))), (((Stalin))), and that boigoitoi (((Nietzsche))). OH GEE, I WONDER WHY PEOPLE HAVE LEARNED TO HATE THE (((MODS))) HERE WHEN THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO GET RID OF ACTUAL CANCER. Instead, (YOU) cry about (((hurrmurrdurr muh mayjowritee r not awlwehz rite))).
You could have gotten rid of jewboomer real easy after the first 10 complaints. Same with all the other cunts. Instead, (You) and the other cankickers waited until the 200+ complaint, then went: !!Oh MuH sHeKelZ i DuNnO wUt tWo Do HerE, pLeEz HaLp MuH dEiCiDe!!
>>174165
Nah. The (((mods))) let britcuck fuckgoy Niggel get away with everything. They have since late 2016, and won't stop either.
You are dead fucking wrong. (They) should've banned him, amongst a dozen other shitniggers, from the ghetto-go, when the complaints started piling up.
>>174158
All of you cucked out, as per usual. Which is perfect knowing that PRECISE SAME CUCKING OUT happened when the (((Gloryhole))) 1/4 kikegoy, the 4cuckoid Anun, the LITERALIST AUTHORITARIAN-COMMIE TANKIE BUTTBRUTHERZ, sockbrates, Niggel, and that insufferable half-kike, half-nigger, all UN lover from June of last year.
All of them had abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING in the means of intellectual dialogue or dialect to share, instead spouting zuckthecuckerboierg fakebawk memes, long kvetching rants from (((Mao))), (((Stalin))), and that boigoitoi (((Nietzsche))). OH GEE, I WONDER WHY PEOPLE HAVE LEARNED TO HATE THE (((MODS))) HERE WHEN THEY DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO GET RID OF ACTUAL CANCER. Instead, (YOU) cry about (((hurrmurrdurr muh mayjowritee r not awlwehz rite))).
You could have gotten rid of jewboomer real easy after the first 10 complaints. Same with all the other cunts. Instead, (You) and the other cankickers waited until the 200+ complaint, then went: !!Oh MuH sHeKelZ i DuNnO wUt tWo Do HerE, pLeEz HaLp MuH dEiCiDe!!
>>174165
Nah. The (((mods))) let britcuck fuckgoy Niggel get away with everything. They have since late 2016, and won't stop either.
>>174166
>(They) should've banned him, amongst a dozen other shitniggers, from the ghetto-go, when the complaints started piling up.
This, tbh. His repeated rule violations and explicit refusal to change were more than enough to warrant a ban by our own rules. Letting him stick around while pushing/breaking rules for three years did significant damage to our board.
Rules need to be enforced, and there is a real cost to not enforcing them. I hope we learn from this experience.
>(They) should've banned him, amongst a dozen other shitniggers, from the ghetto-go, when the complaints started piling up.
This, tbh. His repeated rule violations and explicit refusal to change were more than enough to warrant a ban by our own rules. Letting him stick around while pushing/breaking rules for three years did significant damage to our board.
Rules need to be enforced, and there is a real cost to not enforcing them. I hope we learn from this experience.
>>174183
I'll grant that banning Nigel outright would have saved us all a lot of aggravation. For my part, I prefer to avoid banning anyone except as a last resort; maybe that was the wrong call in this instance. If so, I apologize. All I can really say in my defense is that at one time I honestly did believe there was some creative potential buried underneath all of that autism, and I assumed that if enough people kept piling on him for long enough he would eventually get the message and change his behavior. At the same time, though, you have to admit that some of the Nigel drama was pretty funny.
>>174166
>pLeEz HaLp MuH dEiCiDe!!
No. If you want to kill God, do it yourself.
Seriously, though, you of all people are hardly in a position to complain about anyone's posts being cancer. If I were going to start arbitrarily banning people just for being obnoxious, you would be at the top of the list. You are at least as inarticulate as Nigel, and nearly as annoying. When he was still here and the two of you would get into it, it was like listening to two toddlers screeching at each other.
"HURR ma DURR DuRrR, random FUCKING profanity and TYPING IN ALL CAPS and (((inappropriate use of jew echoes))) and tYpInG LiKE tHiS jUsT tO bE oBnOxxIoUs and endless INSULTS and SLURS and aD hOmInEmS, everyone is a CUCKGOI or a zuckercuckbergfaggotgoyslimeniggerhurmadurrdurreatthepudding, maybe it's all a (((HEGELIAN DIALECTIC))) or some other inappropriate use of a term because I DOn'T KNoW what WORDS MEAN!!1!!"
See how fucking annoying that is? Why not just learn to express yourself in coherent English like a normal person? Also: why are you saging a thread that's already past bump limit?
I'll grant that banning Nigel outright would have saved us all a lot of aggravation. For my part, I prefer to avoid banning anyone except as a last resort; maybe that was the wrong call in this instance. If so, I apologize. All I can really say in my defense is that at one time I honestly did believe there was some creative potential buried underneath all of that autism, and I assumed that if enough people kept piling on him for long enough he would eventually get the message and change his behavior. At the same time, though, you have to admit that some of the Nigel drama was pretty funny.
>>174166
>pLeEz HaLp MuH dEiCiDe!!
No. If you want to kill God, do it yourself.
Seriously, though, you of all people are hardly in a position to complain about anyone's posts being cancer. If I were going to start arbitrarily banning people just for being obnoxious, you would be at the top of the list. You are at least as inarticulate as Nigel, and nearly as annoying. When he was still here and the two of you would get into it, it was like listening to two toddlers screeching at each other.
"HURR ma DURR DuRrR, random FUCKING profanity and TYPING IN ALL CAPS and (((inappropriate use of jew echoes))) and tYpInG LiKE tHiS jUsT tO bE oBnOxxIoUs and endless INSULTS and SLURS and aD hOmInEmS, everyone is a CUCKGOI or a zuckercuckbergfaggotgoyslimeniggerhurmadurrdurreatthepudding, maybe it's all a (((HEGELIAN DIALECTIC))) or some other inappropriate use of a term because I DOn'T KNoW what WORDS MEAN!!1!!"
See how fucking annoying that is? Why not just learn to express yourself in coherent English like a normal person? Also: why are you saging a thread that's already past bump limit?
>>174184
I was referring to the boomer, not Nigel.
>All I can really say in my defense is that at one time I honestly did believe there was some creative potential buried underneath all of that autism
Yeah, I could say that for Nigel, but in all my scrutiny I didn't see anything the boomer posted that was worth keeping. He shit up dozens of my threads while contributing nothing to the conversation. He mass-dunped the tier of Facebook sewage that this board was created to escape. He didn't even post ponies in any context other than his reaction image folder. Most of his posting consisted of general-bumping, meme-dumps, rage-bait, or tangential arguments that derailed good threads: having borne witness to the cancer for three years, Idk what value he had that would have warranted letting him break rules with impunity or shit up the site for so long.
I was referring to the boomer, not Nigel.
>All I can really say in my defense is that at one time I honestly did believe there was some creative potential buried underneath all of that autism
Yeah, I could say that for Nigel, but in all my scrutiny I didn't see anything the boomer posted that was worth keeping. He shit up dozens of my threads while contributing nothing to the conversation. He mass-dunped the tier of Facebook sewage that this board was created to escape. He didn't even post ponies in any context other than his reaction image folder. Most of his posting consisted of general-bumping, meme-dumps, rage-bait, or tangential arguments that derailed good threads: having borne witness to the cancer for three years, Idk what value he had that would have warranted letting him break rules with impunity or shit up the site for so long.
>>174185
Oh I see, I guess I misunderstood which part of the rant you were replying to. Yeah, boomer anon is pretty much a lost cause; to hell with him. His content is just bad, without even being bad in a way that you can make fun of. If he can interact normally with the site and become indistinguishable from any other anon he's as welcome here as anyone else, but if he starts up that facebook meme-dumping bullshit again then if I have any say in it he's gone.
Oh I see, I guess I misunderstood which part of the rant you were replying to. Yeah, boomer anon is pretty much a lost cause; to hell with him. His content is just bad, without even being bad in a way that you can make fun of. If he can interact normally with the site and become indistinguishable from any other anon he's as welcome here as anyone else, but if he starts up that facebook meme-dumping bullshit again then if I have any say in it he's gone.
Anonymous
No.174188
1718849155.png (84.4 KB, 1103x601, PONIES ALLOWED, NO EXCEPTIONS.png)
>>174185
>He didn't even post ponies in any context other than his reaction image folder.
Ahem.
https://mlpol.net/policy
>He didn't even post ponies in any context other than his reaction image folder.
Ahem.
https://mlpol.net/policy
>174188
Way to miss the fucking point you stupid, stupid nigger.
I thought you intended to
>no longer participate in a controlled opposition playground
And yet you came crawling back anyway, you narcissistic fuck.
Way to miss the fucking point you stupid, stupid nigger.
I thought you intended to
>no longer participate in a controlled opposition playground
And yet you came crawling back anyway, you narcissistic fuck.
Anonymous
No.174193
>>174190
What part of NO Exceptions you Mr. didn't understand? No matter your point, which is irrelevant when posting ponies is the subject. You should apologize and ask forgiveness.
What part of NO Exceptions you Mr. didn't understand? No matter your point, which is irrelevant when posting ponies is the subject. You should apologize and ask forgiveness.
>he thinks the issue is that he's posting reaction images
>not the fact that his posing and pretending to fit in when it's glaringly obvious he doesn't even care about ponies
This dense motherfucker.
>not the fact that his posing and pretending to fit in when it's glaringly obvious he doesn't even care about ponies
This dense motherfucker.
Anonymous
No.174195
>>174190
>mfw boomer is back again just a month after saying he'd leave
That's what I get for taking his word for it.
>mfw boomer is back again just a month after saying he'd leave
That's what I get for taking his word for it.
Anonymous
No.174198
Anonymous
No.174215
1719070587_2.jpg (37.0 KB, 477x717, Screenshot_2024-06-14-18-32-04-86_1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9.jpg)
1719070587_4.png (684.1 KB, 1218x675, flat_and_level_dbz-overlay.png)
Long time no see horsefuckers, how goes it
I know you want to keep spamming horsepussy as ammunition against shills, thats fine. But Ive already been through it all. I spilled a bunch of coom at colorful TV screens. Just want to let you know some of us have grown up and our priorities have changed.
Heres some more memes, let us know when you got globe proof
I know you want to keep spamming horsepussy as ammunition against shills, thats fine. But Ive already been through it all. I spilled a bunch of coom at colorful TV screens. Just want to let you know some of us have grown up and our priorities have changed.
Heres some more memes, let us know when you got globe proof
Anonymous
No.174216
>174215
Anonymous
No.174220
>my intention is no longer participate in a controlled opposition playground. On my part, it was a good ride and I truly enjoyed it
https://youtube.com/shorts/XVAJ1cb5GYQ?si=P5Pq68q2IFsuNztz
Just gonn let Charlie put the final nail into our departed flatty's coffin
Just gonn let Charlie put the final nail into our departed flatty's coffin
>>186584
>the sky proves the shape of the ground
So youre just going to make assumptions about what the sun is? A sphere bigger than earth but 90 million miles away?
No wonder they had to change the name from "final experiment" to "final expedition". Theres no independent nor dependent variable involved
>the sky proves the shape of the ground
So youre just going to make assumptions about what the sun is? A sphere bigger than earth but 90 million miles away?
No wonder they had to change the name from "final experiment" to "final expedition". Theres no independent nor dependent variable involved
Did you all see the 24 hour tracking of the sun in Antarctica?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjQCb2TUMIU
>>186584
Very cool.
>>188483
The independent variable is time (and date).
The dependant variable is the location of the sun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjQCb2TUMIU
>>186584
Very cool.
>>188483
The independent variable is time (and date).
The dependant variable is the location of the sun.
>>188570
Mate, time cannot be an independent variable in an experiement. You have to be able to manipulate your independent variable
Mate, time cannot be an independent variable in an experiement. You have to be able to manipulate your independent variable
>>188645
Mate, you're engaging in frivolity if you think the flatty is receptible to reason; quoted recently as saying "I won't engage in discussion."
Frenly notification
Mate, you're engaging in frivolity if you think the flatty is receptible to reason; quoted recently as saying "I won't engage in discussion."
Frenly notification
>>188647
>receptible to reason
You mean such as claiming time to be an independent variable?
Heres what I know. The Antarctica footage couldve been fake, Or it could be real. Still begs the question. There could be a 24 hour summer sun all the time, or maybe its only sometimes. Still begs the question. Theres reports for both instances of it happening. Maybe its not constant.
Anyways I thought this is a good watch
https://youtu.be/sF03FN37i5w?si=7Vs-qohrOuMTFZBO
>receptible to reason
You mean such as claiming time to be an independent variable?
Heres what I know. The Antarctica footage couldve been fake, Or it could be real. Still begs the question. There could be a 24 hour summer sun all the time, or maybe its only sometimes. Still begs the question. Theres reports for both instances of it happening. Maybe its not constant.
Anyways I thought this is a good watch
https://youtu.be/sF03FN37i5w?si=7Vs-qohrOuMTFZBO
>>188648
>heres what I know
Frightfully little, from what you've displayed. What IS your game? You won't acknowledge any position that legitimately invalidates your own, so what is the point in engaging with you? Why SHOULD the site tolerate the flat earth thread (beyond general staples such as proprietyand all)? You won't engage when your"gotcha"-memes are with effort refuted,so it stands to reason that you arent worth the effort and neither is flat earth.
Your counterpoint?
>heres what I know
Frightfully little, from what you've displayed. What IS your game? You won't acknowledge any position that legitimately invalidates your own, so what is the point in engaging with you? Why SHOULD the site tolerate the flat earth thread (beyond general staples such as proprietyand all)? You won't engage when your"gotcha"-memes are with effort refuted,so it stands to reason that you arent worth the effort and neither is flat earth.
Your counterpoint?
>>188650
Try not being incorrect and maybe you wont be corrected. Or just concede the fact you dont know how an experiment works
Now sure what exactly you want from me. Theres 2 sides to take. 2 different positions here is there not? If you make claims such as time being an independent variable expect to be corrected on it
>Why should the site tolerate the flat earth thread?
What are you talking about? The site has made up its mind already, it doesnt tolerate it. I give a shit less, I just take a peek here now and then. Can only do that after the bump limit
Try not being incorrect and maybe you wont be corrected. Or just concede the fact you dont know how an experiment works
Now sure what exactly you want from me. Theres 2 sides to take. 2 different positions here is there not? If you make claims such as time being an independent variable expect to be corrected on it
>Why should the site tolerate the flat earth thread?
What are you talking about? The site has made up its mind already, it doesnt tolerate it. I give a shit less, I just take a peek here now and then. Can only do that after the bump limit
Anonymous
No.188727
>>188665
And this sory of disingenuity is why the site decided to make an exception. Enjoy languishing in the recesses of the catalog, where no one has to entertain your nonsense, either in general and specifically on the overboard. ^_^
And this sory of disingenuity is why the site decided to make an exception. Enjoy languishing in the recesses of the catalog, where no one has to entertain your nonsense, either in general and specifically on the overboard. ^_^
>>188645
It's when the recording happens, choosing which day the experiment is on changes the location of the sun from that controlled position.
So following experiments can replicate this observational data, on the same day there will be minute changes to the way the sun moves between experiments with a year long gap between them. But multiple cameras recording all on the same day will get the same information.
Hypotheses the sun will not go below the horizon on that day, given the testing location.
It's when the recording happens, choosing which day the experiment is on changes the location of the sun from that controlled position.
So following experiments can replicate this observational data, on the same day there will be minute changes to the way the sun moves between experiments with a year long gap between them. But multiple cameras recording all on the same day will get the same information.
Hypotheses the sun will not go below the horizon on that day, given the testing location.
>>188794
Sorry but no, a recording is not an independent variable which can affect a dependent variable. "Location of the sun" cant be manipulated either.
Sorry but no, a recording is not an independent variable which can affect a dependent variable. "Location of the sun" cant be manipulated either.
Anonymous
No.189809
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1950] [1951-2000] [2001-2050] [2051-2100] [2101-2150] [2151-2200] [2201-2250] [2251-2300] [2301-2350] [2351-2400] [2401-2450] [2451-2500] [2501-2550] [2551-2600] [2601-2650] [2651-2700] [2701-2750] [2751-2784] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
2784 replies | 1433 files | 282 UUIDs | Page 7