/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2734 replies and 1406 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.164881
164882 164889
uberthot.jpg
>>164845
>>164865
This.
Essentially how I go about things.
>>164852
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition
The question is not whether they withstand opposition or not. But rather, how much importance you want to grant to some random aspie. It's just like Jordan Peterstein said:

<"You don't have to put up with children's bullshit"
You can just opt out and say: "Well, feel free to make the last post ITT, you fucking manchild..."
Anonymous
No.164882
164883 164906
nothing ever goes to space.jpg
>>164881
>You can just opt out and say: "Well, feel free to make the last post ITT, you fucking manchild..."
This.
A baller gang came to shit this bread and they are getting frustrated and making a fuzz because OP won't take them seriously.
Anonymous
No.164883
164884 164906
>>164882
you know, this is observably, demonstrably false. I grew up in Florida and once or twice a year my old man would take me up to watch shuttle launches. They went up but they sure didn't come down for a few days.
Anonymous
No.164884
164885 164886
>>164883
>you know, this is observably, demonstrably false
I guess your old man took you with him in day time. The photograph is a night time capture with a very long exposure to capture the rocket's real trajectory.
Anonymous
No.164885
a2089f6606a835b1020eea8995b9685c.jpg
>>164884
>very long exposure
Perhaps ISO 3200.
Anonymous
No.164886
164887 164888
>>164884
actually I'm going to say with almost certainty that I was there for STS-84's launch, the time of year feels right and I remember we had to get up REALLY early to go catch it

Launched: May 15, 1997 4:07:48 a.m. EDT
Landing Site: Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Landing: May 24, 1997, 9:27:44 a.m. EDT
Anonymous
No.164887
164888
>>164886
and to answer your next cope:
6:32 AM
Thursday, May 15, 1997 (EDT)
Sunrise in Daytona Beach, FL
Anonymous
No.164888
164899 164906
rfv.png
>>164886
>>164887
Checking your NASA charts?
Anonymous
No.164889
164891 164895
>>164881
Would that it were so simple.
Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you, but the flat earth psyop is as subversive to objective reality as the transgender craze, just targeting a different demographic.
Anonymous
No.164891
164892 164901
gr.png
>>164889
>sheer dishonesty
Flat Earth is based on demonstrable and reproducible experiments, not to mention wide inconsistencies in the heliocentric model.
Transgender craze is based on political correctness which by definition is deliberated distortion of language, when not suppression of inconvenient facts.
Anonymous
No.164892
164893 164896
>>164891
Splitting hairs, they both involve a denial of objective reality with spurious ideas brought about by ignorant and stupid people
https://youtu.be/ww47bR86wSc [Embed]
Anonymous
No.164893
164894
Screenshot_2.png
>>164892
Ahem, even if the video at first glance looks sound, jew propaganda is not welcome.
Anonymous
No.164894
>>164893
>literal ad hominem
Anonymous
No.164895
1658412959.mp4 (10.4 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:15, simplescreenrecorder-2022-02-03_20.08.31.mp4) [play once] [loop]
simplescreenrecorder-2022-02-03_20.08.31.mp4
>>164889
I could see this. Making up wacky shit and associating it with your enemies they do all the time

I cringe when it's mentioned by people like Sven or Mike, even though they're usually good. I've also seen a few sites make articles about Nazi flat-earthers
Anonymous
No.164896
164904
What yo sayin neighua.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.164897
164898
What's /Flat Earth General/'s Opinion on The Holocaust?
Anonymous
No.164898
164900
a6094a2a473b8b57.png
unknown-66.png
Gassed by Law.mp3
cb4d8c22f9bc2403.jpg
5031d24d316d6fea.png
>>164897
Anonymous
No.164899
>>164888
yes, I googled scheduled STS launches because I was a child at the time. I'm sorry, is my objective, personal experience not good enough for you retard? KSFS launches are public for the most part, go watch one if you can scrape together enough allowance for a bus ticket to Florida
Anonymous
No.164900
_JA .jpg
>>164898
Based
Anonymous
No.164901
164905
she_stare.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.164902
164905
And ffs, why doesn't this thread have IDs? It's impossible to have a consistent argument like this.
Anonymous
No.164904
>>164896
That the theory of idiocy was derived in Nazi Germany in concentration camps has no bearing on the phenomenon, and I postrd it cuz OP is precisely the sort of idiot that is described in the video, since you're so quick on the uptake
Anonymous
No.164905
>>164901
Wanna see him lose his shit?
Not a freemason, but I AM a Senior DeMolay; the youth version of freemasonry.
That oughta give him all the paranoid rope he'll need.
>>164902
Almost like OP didnt want to have a legitimate discussion
Anonymous
No.164906
164907
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.164907
>>164906
I was one of those "I wanna be an astronaut" kids so when the old man had enough gas to take me up I went, just like Disney
Anonymous
No.164968
165045
NASA CGI fakery.png

Anonymous
No.165045
>>164968
Bruh
Anonymous
No.165088
165089
1658733248.webm (17.2 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:25, 1000 year old Flat Earth map.webm) [play once] [loop]
1000 year old Flat Earth map.webm
1000 year old Flat Earth map.
Anonymous
No.165089
165090
>>165088
>shard earth image at the beginning
Now you're talking. Oh wait, nevermind. Nice claims, be even mocer if there was anything to vet, like someone alive in this century, or anything more than unverifiable claims
Anonymous
No.165090
165091 165092
>>165089
>unverifiable claims
Such as like this realm is a ball?
Anonymous
No.165091
165092
>>165090
There are plenty of clues and hard experiments debunking the planet baloney, for example >>149637
Anonymous
No.165092
165093
>>165090
Only if you're willfully ignorant
>>165091
Still thinking that a bunch of guys on a boat cant produce enough error and variance in angle/calculation to produce those results eh?
Anonymous
No.165093
>>165092
>guys on a boat
Incorrect. It is guys on the shore pointing at the distance. According to the paid "honorable and trustworthy scientists", the curvature would make the laser beam impossible to see. But because of the laser can be seen, their lies are busted.
Anonymous
No.165094
165096
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.165096
165097
science, a joke.jpg
>>165094
>You know what they say: If your experiment proves you wrong, just disregard the results!
This is exactly what the "respectable scientists" do all the time. Their experiment fails and they ask for more money to reach the result wanted by the establishment, and if not experiment can match the answer they want, they pull deliriant theories from their asses and promote them as truth. It is fucking preposterous.
Anonymous
No.165097
165098
Screenshot_20220725-034947_Chrome.jpg
>>165096
Oh, noticed this:
No wonder you lot like to use that calculator to 'debunk' the curve; it's wrong
Anonymous
No.165098
165099
>>165097
>it's wrong
>>>/github/
Anonymous
No.165099
165102
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.165100
165101
calc-method.png
As you can see indicated in the previous citation and this one from their sourcepage, no allowance was made for the sphereoid natureof the planet, they are calculating it as though the planet is a theoretical (read: perfect) sphere.
Thats the problem.
Anonymous
No.165101
165103
>>165100
>Thats the problem.
None when the equation is translated to real life measurements. This bread has plenty of info and REPRODUCIBLE experiments (as the Scientific Method demands) to make your shilling improper as best, dishonest at worst.
Anonymous
No.165102
165103
>>165099
>Its an oblate sphereoid.
And how you know?
Anonymous
No.165103
165105
>>165101
You see that R figure on the image? That stands for RADIUS. with a SPHEREOID, the radius is NEVER EQUAL. Therefore, any equation that tries to use them AS equal, is FLAWED. Moving on
>>165102
Because people who can conduct proper experiments and equations have been doing so for millennia. Moron
Anonymous
No.165104
Correction: if you're willing to crunch the numbers and illustrate how the variance is/would-be negligable, that would be a credible counterpoint. Its plausible, given the localized environment of the experiment.
Having said, the radius from the earth's core to the equator is longest, and the radius from the north pole to the core is the shortest.
Anonymous
No.165105
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.165112
165114 165115 165122
reflection.jpg

Anonymous
No.165114
>>165112
>hey hey guys, heres another Facebook meme! This one is super smart too!
Anonymous
No.165115
1658836512.mp4 (211.8 KB, Resolution:720x720 Length:00:00:03, 286452613_420293330107649_8235356844800765131_n.mp4) [play once] [loop]
286452613_420293330107649_8235356844800765131_n.mp4
>>165112
This is pure nonsense. Light and images aren't beams. You should be able to see the moon and it's reflection from multiple angles.
Anonymous
No.165122
165123 165124
ss.png
moonreflection2.png
>>165112
Kinda fun to make but I wish the meme didn't use such a dumb model since it's hard to get a nice trail reflection like in the image with these relative scales, though I also think I made my waves too high, and it's BSDF instead of a glass shader for actually reflective water since that would take way too long to render
Anonymous
No.165123
>>165122
*actually refractive water
Anonymous
No.165124
>>165122
Youre not taking that meme seriously, are you? Like, the image is so ridiculously modified that its absurd. Especially funny, givrn how flat earthers are all up in arms about "NASA edits" n shit. Like seriously, has one never seen a r3flection of the moon? Its not prominent, in fact the reflection of the moon is proportionate to its size in the night's sky, and such memes are disingenuous on their face.
But its quite obvious when it happens.

Thread Watcher
TW