This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
>>163368>music and psychologYou don't qualify to evaluate even physics 101. That said, read a book nigger.
>>163369Oh, thays just college. That is what you said, college.
I got my engineering creds - which people actually pay me money for, enough to have employees, no less - from a trade school. But, accredation is an appeal to authority argument, and has no bearing on the discussion.
And speaking of no bearing on the discussion, in an ironic parallel to ITT, here's the latest Flat Earth Fridays!
Credit, I was oblivious to Sci Man Dan until this thread showed up https://youtu.be/2huZYKlAdVQ
>>163370>Sci DanThat paid shill together with all NASA spoke persons won't debate Eric Dubay. There has to be a reason for them not to take that golden opportunity to shame and discredit the Flat Earth poster boy.
Interestingly, the same scenario applies to holohoax propagandists who always decline to debate holohoax debunkers.
>>163376>Flatty's cannot dispute this.Interesting details. And yet heliocentrism is not holding water, the announced curve cannot be found, then the globe is a fantasy.
>>163376As usual, surely Globebuster made an answer video to the glober. Videos of answer and counter-answers (polemic) populate jew-tube. By posting that Sci-fi Dan video, you are posting a partial view on the subject.
Take in count that OP refrains from posting this kind of crap and sticks to the facts.
>>163379>sci fi danNgl, thats hilarious, cuz its not wrong. Still, this is the flat earth thread so this is where such content applies, whether in support or in contest of flat earth
ahem theory. Gives an idea, actually; youll see.
>based nasaponr
https://youtu.be/zixc8eojZdgHeres a 25 minute video showing the very slow process of a distant supertanker deacending over the horizon.
Pay specific attention to how OP reacts to yet more incontravertable visual evidence of curvature
Recommended at 2x speed
>>163017Because the sensors are square. But the lens does add barrel distortion, it's just slight enough in most cases that you don't notice it. In 3D renders people add in fake distortion to make it look more realistic
Actual photo of a straight building
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SpyTP7rdwv6N-cA9VToYfBIS8yj6lg5Py2XfOeo488Q/edit#slide=id.g141444f9b3_1_251>>163365The reasoning for this could be as simple as the winds being strong or them not wanting to risk having a problem while being in the middle of nowhere to land. But I'm guessing there's also some economy to it, since flights aren't always simple A to B but can have people going to multiple different destinations and if you go a path that's close to many others you can make dropoffs for all of those places, and load on new passengers, places probably more worthwhile than Africa
How do you explain flight paths being curved most of the time? Including, yes, when they do actually go from Africa to South America or Australia
If you flattys get some flat earth bitch to suck my cock I might start shilling for it.
>>163507And yet, this realm is flat.
>>163508Rude
>>163509It could be for a price, until then it's round.
>>163511The Burden of Proof is on (you) by the way don't just say "Hurr Look at da thread"
People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.
>>163512>People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.Not true.
What you call "people" were a bunch of freemason satanists spouting kabbala teachings. Heliocentrism is opposed to the our natural senses and is debunked by experimentation.
Real "people" from before and after the middle ages knew Earth is flat.
>>163513Why would freemasons waste so many resources from the middle ages up until the present trying to convince everyone that the planet we are on is flat?
>>163515>meme arrow instead of just telling me>linking to a 30 minute video without timestampsC'mon you gotta do better than that if you want to convince me.
>>163516>B-but.. why?>linking to a 30 minute video without timestampsI knew it. You won't do any research whatsoever.
>>163517>More meme arrows instead of just telling me why the masons would waste their most precious recourses on perpetuating a scam on a global magnitudeYou know. if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answer
>>163518>if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answerSadly I can't give you a pol/ack answer, it is forbidden by rule #7.
>>163522Hardly when it is you who won't research and choose to parrot heliocentric falsehoods.
>>163513>mideval freemasonsPlease, PLEASE attempt to validate this point, I beg (you).
>>163520>I cant cuz da roolzUhm,... what?
>>163523No no, you opened this can of worms.
How do site rules prohibit you from simply answering the question?
>inb4 the site is staffed by masons
I wish IDs were turned on so I could call out the faggot(s) that ignore my points whenever I post them in reply to some dumb meme they post.
>>163482 >>163311 >>162824 >>162790 still waiting
The threads all dumb memes and bickering about "AD HOMINIM" or "BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU" because the flat earth fags can't do anything else
Today's Flat Eart Friday was boring, just some loon reeeeing about how video of the International Space station can't be real cuz this one guy's collar moves at this point, and how its probably a green screen in spite of them passing a floating microphone around.
So instead, here's a vid where Sci Dan and Prof. Dave go over the main proofs from Dave's debate with "DITRH", for those who dont comprehend the citations.
https://youtu.be/26UkTow1RRoOriginal post
>>163010
>>163538>>163685>Sci-Fi DanAnd yet, how come the curvature can't be found?
>33.63 miles No curvature..Againhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6kOOvNLuGY
>>163690I trust you're going to pretend all the proofs posted in your absence dont exist?
>>163697>all the proofs postedSeriously?
Any pseudo proof is rendered null if not a curve is found.
>>158063Try to comprehend it this time
>>163697Sorry fren but there is point where you have to face the Plane.
>>163701How come its only in obscure locations and by dodgy indivoduals that results like this manifest? How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature? Like the 15deg tilt gauge incident?
Ahem
>>163525
>>163704>How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature?Simple, if the faggots doing the measurements and equipment are paid by the occupiers in power, the results will always be the same lies.
Independent research discovers what the globe religion won't tell.
>>163781I get it now. Flat Earth is conceptually a hierarchy structured around scientific invompetence (umbrella term representing the various fields that unanimously, cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earth), where the greater one's assertiveness and incompetence, the further 'up' the hierarchy.
>>163783>cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earthMost of those results are not valid at all as the (((occupiers))) won't allow travel beyond the 60th Parallel and claim a monopoly on ship's traffic rights.
>>163785speaking of Antarctica and/or "the Antarctic Ice Wall"
lolIF the flat earth pizza were a thing
THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.
In a globe, the upper hemisphere is equidistant to the lower hemisphere.
In a flat earth, the upper hemisphere is a fraction of the distance around the same latitudinal position
>flat earth
The circumference of the line closer to the north pole is much less than the like that goes near the ice wall, represented by the border. And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
>>163786>THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.That's correct.
Search for captain Cook in this thread, he sailed like 70,000 miles trying to go around Antarctica, but he couldn't cos' Earth is a plane.
>>163788And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
Everyday.
Search for flying routes in this thread.
>>163790>NavigationPlanes are based on profit motive, of getting as many people from everywhere to everywhere else. Its not like when you buy a plane ticket they fly ONLY YOU nonstop to wherever, unless you charter a plane for ~1.5 million. The failure to grasp how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans is one of your most laugable bits of incompetence.
>CookYes, your idiocy on that has already been addressed. Heres the reminder!
>>149629>Cook>149629
>>163795>how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans Are you implying that all air traffic control and navigators have successfully been bribed into concealing the shape of the earth?
>>163796>denial plus sticking to the brainwashing programmingLet us check what some technical guy has to say out:
>US Navy Missile Instructor Proof of Service - Flat Earth - Mark Sargenthttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/Z5jWs-xZiaEMark Sargent is a Flat Earth researcher and cat is out of the bag.
Allow me to shill some Firmament models.
Not mine but they are cool nevertheless
https://flatearthmodels.com/
According to flat earth, the distance between blue x and y, and red x and y is:
A. the same
B. blue is greater distance than red
C. red is greater than blue
D. omfg, masonic nasa shill