/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>169803
The meme says 22 hours. You lied. You are suggesting you made the meme yourself or comes from trusted sources. It is proven to be a lie because it was 2.5 hours.

>>169804
>The meme says 22 hours. You lied.
You lie. According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours. If they replenished their air supply, is not proven.

>>169806
https://youtu.be/S7Cl1hRMPA8?feature=shared
The meme says 22 hours. The sources said 22 is aggregate. Are you telling me that they didn't sleep at all during the mission?

>>169803
The life support system is visibly bigger than the two tanks in your stupid meme: the tank is literally bigger.
It also, again, doesn't need to account for bends, and it is doesn't waste oxygen by bubbling it away.

It's ridiculous for a suit to last 22 hours, but one being designed to last for six hours is well within the realm of possibility for all of the reasons described above. Just the fact that the suit is a closed system alone means it's drastically more air-efficient than the civilian diver's tank.
Also, they didn't even use it for the full 6 hours, they did it for 2.5 hours. 6 hours is it's absolute maximum. Even most diving tanks can actually go for longer than their labelling recommends, but only retards would push the limit when their brain tissue is on the line. They made a suit that was more than twice the capacity they needed because they had to account for things going wrong and the astronauts somehow being delayed on their path back to the vessel.

>>169807
>Are you telling me that they didn't sleep at all during the mission?
Sleeping does not stops breathing. Just saying.

>>169806
>You lie. According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
Where and when has NASA ever said this? It's not in any of their documentation or their announcements.

>>169809
They weren't wearing the suits while they slept, idiot. They slept aboard the vessel, which had more than enough Oxygen.

>>169803
>refusing to acknowledge the tank sizes
We all said the tank on the suit is visibly bigger. You can see that it's bigger.

>>169806
>According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
[Citation needed]

>>169755
You simply get as much attention as you intended to raise. By saging, that means nothing at all.

>>169914
Pretty much this.

>>169914
Then why are you replying now?

Heres a quick short, so you wont have missed out
https://youtube.com/shorts/cu4tYxZA0g4?si=ke3za4YYvg579u2g

>>169940
Just to let you know. You should be happier anon.

>>169985
I'm not the same guy.

>>170134
And I'm not OP. Checkmate fagget.

>>170135
Checkmate what? What's your point?

Hello anons.

>>170137
What's the bottom photo from?

Privately owned high altitude aerostatic balloon.

>>170139
Which one?
I'm trying to look it up.

>>170137
It's pretty easy to cut photos like this to make them appear flat. It doesn't help that the lower photo is so grainy; almost as it it were cut from a larger image.
Of course, we could settle this right away if we had the name of the balloon and the date this photo was taken.
>>170139
Privately owned by who?

>>170141
>It's pretty easy to cut photos like this to make them appear flat
You tell me. For decades the masons have been using eyefish lenses and everybody swallowed the hoax.

>>170142
More like the opposite. Defishing high altitude photos make them appear flat. Give me a named example of a balloon and I'll show it to you.

>>170142
What about the image you posted though? How do you know there wasn't any fisheye involved?

>>170142
Exactly, funny how globers are only so skeptic when it come to alternative true evidence.

>>170145
About that whole eclipse thing,....

>>170145
>true evidence
You've still yet to give the name of the balloon, or any single example we can analyze.

>>170142
Does that include the supposed privately-owned high altitude balloon that you posted?

>>170146
I, too, am interested in what flat earthers have to say about the ring of fire eclipse.

>>170149
Just wait until april. Many may have missed the last one, but they WONT miss this one
No doubt itll be factored into the ramping WW3 talking points,... ugh, its gonna get spicy

>>169806
>According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
I haven't found NASA saying this anywhere. You must be mistaken.

>>170137
>List 25 filename
Really? That's where you get this crap?

Globers in this thread.

>>170181
Mhm, about that whole 'eclipse' thingy

Chunk of the moon appears to be orbiting near Earth.

To the globers.

>>170186
What's so special about this particular pic?
Also, this wasn't filmed. It was a photograph. The videos are much lower quality because video tech wasn't as developed back then.

>>170185
>they're saying a piece of the moon just fell off
It didn't "just fall off". It's been there for a century.
>two years ago they said the same.
>second time in two years
The asteroid was named as a quasi-satellite in 2016, a study in 2021 analyzed it's material composition, and a recent study graphed it's current orbit and extrapolated it's previous orbit. This retard didn't even read the articles he's ridiculing, because he's claiming that NASA said two things happened when in fact both articles are referring to the same fucking rock.
It was two years ago (2021) that a study was done analyzing the light reflecting off of the asteroid and concluding that it had the same substance composition as the moon, but weren't sure how a lunar object would
The new study is based on a computer simulation that graphs the asteroids orbit, explaining how Kamoʻoalewa attained such a peculiar orbit bouncing between the earth and Sun's gravity.

Both studies were referring to the same rock, the rock that has been circling for decades. Nobody ever claimed that a piece of the moon "fell off" of it two years in a row, unlike what this wigger is saying.

Do you even research this shit before posting it?

>>170185
>NASA just announced
Ffs, they did not "just announce" it. The recent announcement was publishing a simulation-based study about it's historical orbit and a prediction for how long it will start near earth.

>>170187
>>170188
>>170192
Freemason spokesperson replays...

>>170193
>ad homenim
Are you going to refute the argument, or was what I said correct?

>>170194
You know he wont, because it is.
Still waiting on that whole eclipse thing not to mention the ships over the horizon thing
But staff is okay with this cuz it doesnt hilight (and yet it does) their malfeasance

>>170195
He won't answer about the eclipse because he's embarrassed that he can't.

>>170212
Starlink is going pretty well for him. That satellite Internet is really taking off.
Elon owns half of the satellites orbiting the earth right now. It's come to the point where the U.S. military had to buy their own Starlink system for Ukraine so that Elon wouldn't be able to turn it off.

>>170213
>Starlink is going pretty well for him. That satellite Internet is really taking off.
A hint.
Neither Starlink or any satellite service does work in the mountains away from populated regions nor in the middle of the ocean. And when actually and intermittently works is because there is a balloon floating at 30km high relaying the signal.

>>170216
>Neither Starlink or any satellite service does work in the mountains
Weren't they using Starlink terminals out in the mountains of Morocco after that earthquake recently?
The biggest benefit of Starlink is that it works even in remote areas and where infrastructure has gone to shit.
>ocean
Yes it does. It has almost complete coverage over all the world's oceans. They use it on ships all of the time.