This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
>>172609lmao this entire wall of text you made instead of admitting you cant verify your CGI photo and restating your argument. narcisissm involves selfishness, thats what it take to believe the cartoon globe. also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water? so yeah trip to ice wall isnt likely
>>172610yes
Oof. The nerve of these globers.
>>172674>>172675I apologize for disturb (you) with memes but eloquence is not my strength.
>>172673>>172674>>172676did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172677I'm OP and I just saw activity in this bread. The post
>>172673 is not mine.
>>172678Don't care, image spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172677>did you verify the meme yourself?There are more than 2K posts above documenting the plane. What else is needed?
>>172680did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172681>CGIAccording to the own words of a NASA employee, which was already posted in some post above, all pictures from space are CGI.
>>172682Your memes are too, spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172684Spam for spam. A fair trade.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
um anon, i think your computer is broken
>obviously appealing to your own authority
yes, faggot
>>172687Why do you post screenshots of things we can all clearly see?
He's repeating himself as a meme.
>>172673>narcisissm involves selfishnessThat's not what narcissism is.
>admitting you cant verify your CGI photoPeople have attempted to identify CGI artifacts in those images various times. Nobody has found evidence of CGI or doctoring.
Feel free to examine them yourself though. Post results.
>why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?They can't even stop the Japanese from poaching whales there.
>trip to ice wall isnt likelyPeople go there for scientific expeditions all of the time. Have you tried doing that?
You can even fly over Antarctica commercially:
https://www.antarcticaflights.com.au/the-worlds-most-unique-scenic-flightThere's one this November. Sign up and post results.
>>172673>also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?It's not a militarized border, and according to you it's a 49747.75 mile circumference. You think they have armed guards on every mile of it? People go there for illegal fishing/whaling all of the time. People go there for legal science/leisure all of the time. There's permanent settlement cabins there. You can go on vacation there too. Cruiselines pass by it. You can sign up for a trip to Antarctica today.
>Star through telescope
How good it is that the normals can have technology and look for themselves.
The three first pics are what the freemasons say above is (pretty CGI to me) versus 4th video what we actually see.
>>172698What is the 4th even from?
>>172700Who took the video? What star is it aimed at?
>>172701There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.
>>172702How am I supposed to verify this video if I can't even see where it comes from? Did you verify it? What relation does it have to the NASA stills you posted (which show three completely different pictures)? What am I looking at?
You are such a s hypocrite, it's unreal.
>>172703>Did you verify it?How can anypony verify you are not a bot? Huh?
Even further, how you can be sure you are not some subroutine in the Matrix?
>>172704It was you who brought up verification. You talked about others being unable to verify pictures of earth, and yet now you're posting videos that you yourself haven't verified.
You are a hypocrite.
Are you sure pic 2 even from NASA? I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.
>>172705>I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.Dude, why you don't get a proper and decent job instead of taking money from zog to oversee some austists?
>>172707>hurr durr ur a glowieI have a job, nigger. And I got all of my work done early, so still have the spare time to call out your faggotry that's been polluting the board I use every day.
You posted three unrelated images, and then compared them to a video depicting an unrelated astrological sight that you can't even name. What were you trying to prove with that?
>>172706I know how to use Yandex, you absolute troglodyte.
>>172702>There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.I'm talking about this video in particular. What is it from? Where did you get it? Who posted it?
>172711
>being this btfo over a lost argument
>>172712>lost argumentThere is none. That cunt has a stuck neural path and insist on information she needs to fill her report. So her request is denied.
>>172713What report?
The argument is that your post didn't make any sense and doesn't prove anything because you're comparing completely unrelated images apples to oranges. You should at least be able to say what the video is from, if you expect anyone to learn anything from it.
How could the earth be flat if it's hollow?
Why isn't this facebook simulator deleted yet?
>>172702did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172713did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172715Based Hollow Earth schizo. Far more interesting than flat earth.
>>172695read the definition of narcissism, you think narcissism means controversial postion, it doesnt. you dont know the definiton of narcissism but you brought up the word first, i had to correct you.
i dont have to identify artifacts to point out CGI, because of the fact you never verified the image to be real yourself. Its still objectively CGI for that reason, until you can verify it. they dont care about saving whales lives obviously, they care about hiding resources and treasures. notice how i specifically said cant explore "freely and privately". youre talking about a tour to antarctica in one specific location.
>>172695entirely false post. it is guarded, there is video evidence of airplanes and boats getting stopped by authorities
>>172705actually it was me who brought up verification, youre talking to someone else. but yes a verification would be nice because thats the job person posting the pic of cartoon globe
>>172715dumb take. flat earth faces censorship and deplatforming too, but not ill grant not as much as stuff like holocaust denial or race realism
>>172719>video evidencedid you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172720i asked my question first, so are you gonna verify your obvious CGI cartoon or nah?
>>172719>you think narcissism means controversial postionI didn't say that.
>definition of narcissismOkay, here it is
>excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one's physical appearance.I.e "everyone is braindead, except for me".
>i dont have to identify artifacts to point out CGI, because of the fact you never verified the image to be real yourselfOthers have. Go check.
If I personally verified that the image lacked artifacts by doing it myself, would you consider it real? Tell me before I waste my time.
>until you can verify itWould you be convinced if I verified it? Will that settle this discussion? Because I'll do it if that's what it'll take.
>youre talking about a tour to antarctica in one specific locationYou can go on tours all over the continent. If you went enough times, you would be able to piece it together.
>flat earth faces censorship and deplatformingYour Facebook group is evidence to the contrary.
You try to talk about Jews on Facebook, and you get banned immediately. You post about flat earth on Facebook, and their algorithm recommends you more.
>>172721did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172722your definition of narcissism is one definiton, there are mutliple definitions for words. in saying that narcisissism equates to selfishness, there is nothing incorrect about that. its just you coping and being autistic
never did i say you CANT verify thats its CGI, just saying its not needed. your job is to verify the photo, not for flat earthers to un-verify it. everything else you just said is a total lie and full of semantics, starting to wonder if you have jewish DNA
>>172725>your job to verifydid you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172726so you cant verify the curvature to exist yourself? thats all i needed to know. thanks for playing