This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
>>170607>pic 1What is that place?
Also, why wouldn't reflections be possible on a round earth?
>pic 2Idk how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible than it would be at sea level.
That diagram is wonky too.
>>170608>What is that place?Uyuni Salt Flats, in Bolivia, South America.
>>170608>how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visibleIt is not about elevation, but a 118 miles distance.
>>170610Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
You'd have to include a person, the location, the celestial bodies, the seasons and how light works.
You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
>>170607>everywhere has to be round or flat all the timeThat's how I know you're a nigger.
>>170612>Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.>You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.Dear anon, you don't want answers but to be right on the lies you support.
The round model fails every time you apply trigonometry and according to the fake scientists numbers. By the way, trigonometry is impervious to scales, in case your arrogant ignorance won't let you study a bit of math to come to the level of discussion needed in this thread.
>>170613It's quite impressive that you've never traveled.
The Earth is an orb-oid it's extremely roughly ovoid to spherical made of spikes, flats, dips, dives and dodge.
A lump.
That means the topology and geology of various locations are varied and different.
There's the macro scale which is close enough to a sphere for rocket, projectile physics.
The local scale is rough.
Trigonometry works.
There is a drop off. Otherwise you can't do ballistics or you miss.
When you know the scale of a man and his measure and what ground he stands on you can know truth.
The truth loves you and is waiting for you.
The truth is alot bigger than you're giving credit for.
Explanations have been posted again and again before. Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
>>170614>Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.That's science 101, sadly, the heliocentric model doesn't pass the tests.
>>170614Globers are under hypnosis, a guy says.
>>170623That's right especially you.
You can't answer anybody's questions.
You can't say why flat earth is important.
You can't critically look at whatever you spout here.
You can't say anything of value besides your talking points.
I get you're trying to psyop because you got salty over being assblasted about jews, samefagging and bring a stick in the mud amidst other faggotry.
I understand you have special needs, very special needs, but I'd suggest focusing your tisms on more profitable pursuits.
>>170650Doesn't this also imply that space is real though, since the particles are coming from outside the field?
Also, this has been a known thing for a while. The Earth's unique magnetic field protects life on the world from harmful solar wind and cosmic particles. It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
>>170651>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.That's what you've been told.
>>170651>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.Mmmm. Do you know that that claim is just a theory? The deepest perforation ever made on the Earth's surface has been only 12 km which can be considered as just a scratch.
>>170653Where are the elections in the link you posted coming from, besides outer space?
>>170654>electionsWhat elections?
>in the link you postedWhat link?
>besides outer spaceThe post mentioned the inner core of a planet. What outer space are you talking about?
>>170687*electrons
>What outer space are you talking about?The pics in
>>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.
>>170688>The pics in >>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.Ah, those.
Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth? I mean, the claim that there is "A Shield" is gibberish for "It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
>>170715>Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth?Then why did you post them?
>"It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".You must've not read it.
>>170716>Then why did you post them?To oblige globers like you. After all, I understand that some fags have problems coming to terms with the lies they have been fed all their lives.
>>170717You just say shit because you like spewing shit.
Wow, amazing, incredible, stupendous.
We have gone 2,225 posts and you are still unable and refuse to prove your position about anything about Flat Earth.
Besides muh globers, hurr durr I'm the smort cause I can say use Camera and ignore everyone.
>>170722The doggy is still digging the filmation set.
>>170942Wow, more brainlet tier memes. I'm so impressed.
>>170943its okay ballfag, we know you cant meme
>>170944You will never have a flat Earth. You have no model, you have no math, you have no testable predictions. You have a zoomed in photo twisted by bad line-of-sight calculations and weed into a crude mockery of God's perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your “friends” laugh at your flattie videos behind closed doors.
Rational people are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of hours of education allow smart people to sniff out pseudo scientific frauds with incredible efficiency. Even flat Earth photos which “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a thinking person. Your unanswerable questions are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk girl to watch a video with you, she’ll turn tail and bolt the second she realizes you weren't just joking about flat Earth conspiracy theory.
You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake "I know it's true!" every single morning and tell yourself others are going to believe. But deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight caused by the force you deny, Earth's gravity.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear – you’ll buy a ring laser gyroscope, start your livestream, and plunge into the cold abyss of Internet mockery. Your parents will find you accidentally proving the globe, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll copy and upload your video across social media, and every viewer for the rest of eternity will know Earth is a rotating globe. Your flat Earth videos will decay and get deleted from YouTube, and all that will remain of your legacy is a video with an experiment that unmistakably proves the globe.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
>>170946ugh guess ill take the time to disect your shitty meme
>muh modelscientific experiments dont require scientific models all the time
>mathmath is used to describe things, whereas physics is meant to explain things. math can be used for anything fake or real
>gyroscopethe 15 degree per hour drift thing is only relative to the poles. it also picks up the movements from the sky. if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
your move fag
>>170950>shitty memeLol, lmao even. The poster of badly-compressed jpegs from Facebook in a constant slew of mediocrity and redundant claims calling anyone memes shitty.
Stay mad.
>dont require scientific modelsAnd yet you can't produce any.
>math can be used for anything fake or realAnd yet you can't use it to prove your own claims.
>if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birdsIt does. That's why they launch rockets from Florida to take advantage of the rotation of the earth.
>>170952the globe model has been falsified countless times. there is no math to prove the globe model. and you are clueless on the expertise of rocket trajectory. yet you just somehow continue to believe that the earth is magically moving beneath your feet because you were indoctrinated as child
>>170953Keep telling yourself that. The Anons on this board will surely come to respect you some day.
>>170955lmao you only care about respect because you dont care about whats true
>>170946>>170952>>170955Here are pones they're (uu)^2.
>>170957>lmaoYou enjoy getting ass blasted that much?
>>170963did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?
>>170964Did you bump this thread just too "le btfo globers" too?
>170964>did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?You're doing a fine enough job on your own.
I'm here to spread hors.
>>170965
>>171165I'm still waiting for some faget to demonstrate the curve.
>>171186We already did, in this thread. Scroll up.
>>171188>We already didVery disappointing, not even one post shows an experiment measuring that theoretical curvature. Like it is a fiction.
Ban evasion
I can't believe this thread is still going, there's probably a serpent-worshiping "jew" behind this scheme somewhere.
BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND! I'll post that proof later, if this giant spergthread continues without some ChristStallion posting it before me.
Advice for life: If somesperg (((claims))) something about God's Word or the Bible, make sure you ask them to show the verse (and context) and check to see if it's KJV - the other versions have varying levels of dangerous corruption in them. For example, even the "New" King James version removes the word/name "Jesus" several times - what kind of "Bible" would remove any mention/naming of Jesus?!
>>171190>I can't believe this thread is still goingIt's all because a single retard keeps bumping it with his crappy Facebook jpgs. The actual "arguments" (if you could call them that) stopped happening years ago.
>>171189>(Ban evasion)I'm not aware anypony was banned. Just saying.