/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
1336 replies and 668 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.165516
165517
>>165515
>Criticize Eric (((Dubay)))'s monopolizing of Flat Earth discourse and censoring any criticism of Jesuits on his platform
>Somehow this is shilling in behalf of... Someone?
Nice try tranny. Go back to licking the boots of that lying Hofjuden. Surely there is no connection between the groups. They're totally uninvolved, because that "well-researched" said so. No further discussion is required.
Anonymous
No.165517
165518 165540
>>165516
Stay on topic. Proof of the curvature may help a lot.
Anonymous
No.165518
165519
>>165517
Where did I say that there was a so-called curve? I'm saying that Eric and his trannies are full of shit and have been subverting the movement for years with his bullshit.
>Stay on topic
So long as Eric Dubay and his shills keep monopolizing flat earth research, he IS the topic. He's got more than half the movement wrapped around his finger, and he's using his """credibility""" to silence independent researchers.
Anonymous
No.165519
165520 165522
>>165518
>So long as Eric Dubay and his shills keep monopolizing flat earth research, he IS the topic.
Absurd.
A man doesn't make the subject, but physical reality. Stop gaslighting with not related wild claims and stick to the topic.
Anonymous
No.165520
165521
>>165519
He doesn't make the subject, he monopolizes it. That's why he torpedos opposing flat earthers all of the time and bans them from his platforms. He is a fucking plant and a profiteer manipulating people looking for truth.
Anonymous
No.165521
165522
ur gay.gif
>>165520
>He doesn't make the subject, he monopolizes it.
You are choosing to go personal, and again, it is off topic.
Anonymous
No.165522
165523
27564__safe_artist-colon-takua770_applejack_pony_season+2_the+return+of+harmony_female_high+res_long+neck_reaction+image_simple+background_smug_solo_transpare.png
>>165519
>not related wild claims
How is blatant controlled opposition not related? This is the thread about the globers mythos, isn't it? Eric Dubay is a part of the whole NASA glow-op coverup. His job is to keep flat earth researchers eating sterilized breadcrumbs out of his palm to make them easier to control and prevent truthers from taking decisive action. I wouldn't be surprised if he reports directly to the 32nd Degree while laughing about how his fans uplift him as a "leader" in "opposition" to Judeao-freemasonry. That race-mixing turbonigger has been taking his own followers for fools, and his sockpuppet Thai tranny worshippers only reinforce his cult of personality.
>>165521
>muh topic
Oh, what are you gonna do, tranny? Are you gonna ban me from the thread like your savior Eric does to all the other independent researchers on his forums? Are you gonna go cry to the mods? Can't handle criticism of an obvious 32nd Degree Jesuit plant? Give me a fucking break. Newsflash: just because someone tells bits and pieces of truth doesn't mean they're not USING YOU.
Anonymous
No.165523
165524
bait.jpg
>>165522
>Eric Dubay is a part of the whole NASA glow-op coverup
Substantiate the claim. Go on, I'm interested.
Anonymous
No.165524
165525 165527 165540
007 and two ball cane Masons Symbol of dyslexic thinking that Esua ruled over Jacob_small.jpg
>>165523
He is from a Freemason family. His own great uncle was a member of the 32'd Degree, and Eric himself has been seen wearing masonic pins before he got into this.
You don't think it's weird how so much of the flat earth truth movement revolves around one personality? How, despite uncontested control of the media by NASA, Dubay has never been substantially threatened? Why his videos alone are so easy to access on the internet, when even toothless clowns like Alex Jones need to keep jumping platforms? How he's able to post his videos with impunity while others are silenced or killed every day? Why he's able to have such a following despite whistleblowers being treated, killed and made examples of? There's an obvious reason why they won't get rid of him: he's no threat to them. His purpose is to control the narrative so that independent researchers can't make achievements, and so that his videos smother any groundbreaking discoveries and prevent action from being taken so that Flat Earth researcher can't make any gains.
And based on his behavior, he's done a good job of that. He's got an enormous following of Facebook normies who believe everything he tells them just because they include crumbs of truth that NASA doesn't consider to be threatening to the narrative, and more importantly he keeps them from looking into things that could actually harm them, like the Jesuit connection between the Freemasons and the globist hoax.
He talks about Jews the same way other controlled opposition clowns like Spencer do, while not saying anything that could actually cause them to face consequences. And despite "calling out" Jews on the globist narrative, he's painfully silent on the other more atrocious crimes of the Jews, like white replacement and genocide (which he willfully participates in by cohorting with Thai trannies).
He silences skeptics and voices that dare to try to turn the narrative away from himself so he can ensure that all flat earth discussions stay on topic related to whatever he just posted that month.
Anonymous
No.165525
165528
>>165524
>His own great uncle was a member of the 32'd Degree
Yup, and he publicly disavowed him and cut all ties.
>He silences skeptics and voices that dare to try to turn the narrative away from himself
Incorrect, he bans shills and any other trying to derail the subject, like (you).
Anonymous
No.165527
165530
>>165524
>He talks about Jews the same way other controlled opposition clowns like Spencer do, while not saying anything that could actually cause them to face consequences.
Not true. Dubay is known for praising NatSoc and avoiding any contact with jews promoting Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165528
165529
large (25).png
>>165525
>he publicly disavowed him
Only after it was pointed out repeatedly and he could no longer cover it up.
>he bans shills and any other trying to derail the subject, like (you).
Oh, so anyone who criticizes Dubay and his impotent vicegrip on the flat earth research community is a shill who needs to be silenced? Nobody can have that opinion genuinely? Anyone who opposes /ourguy/, not flat earth, is a shill? A heretic that must be purged by the Jesuit oath?
That really says a lot about what you think of him.
>>>r/The_Donald
Might be more your speed.
Don't let the door hit you in the maggot-ridden faux vagina on the way out.
Anonymous
No.165529
165531
di.png
>>165528
Slander is all you got. Very jewy of (you).
Anonymous
No.165530
165532
>>165527
>praising NatSoc
So did Spencer. That doesn't make him legitimate, nor does it make him an actual threat to Jews.
It's not just what you say about Jews, but what you say should be done about them, and the results thereof.
At this stage, it doesn't actually bother Jews to be implicated in the glove conspiracy, because the average globist normie is so deep in the works that it doesn't effectively harm them; in fact, Jews have weaponized the words of impotent glow-ops like Eric Dubay to not only discredit Flat Earth researchers, but to discredit truthers about Judaism too.
If he actually cared about removing Jews, he'd list the names of more specific Jews who've directly leading the globist agenda, but he won't because that might put his continued Hofjuden shekels in jeopardy.
Stop acting like this faggot is your savior just because he's "brave" and keeps telling you what you want to hear. It's barely better that taking narratives directly from NASA.
Anonymous
No.165531
165532
>>165529
Oh, pardon. Was I wrong about what I said? Are you willing to refute that, or are you too afraid that Eric "Trust The Plan" Dubay might not actually be on your side?
Open your fucking eyes.
Anonymous
No.165532
165533
f18ae5c279dd3a79ac5fb0d72da2fcf5.jpg
>>165530
>>165531
>slanderous shilling
Would you mind to return to the bread's topic.
Anonymous
No.165533
165534
56xe4d.png
>>165532
>implying criticism of a major player in globist agenda isn't on topic
>getting this buttmad about the reputation of a lying crypto-Jesuit
Topkek. Why are dubtroons so mad about the fact that they're being MKULTRA'd
Anonymous
No.165534
165535
d9g0gf4-343547aa-88f5-4cd9-9b39-035322a59e14.png
>>165533
Anonymous
No.165535
165536
2630334__artist+needed_safe_oc_oc+only_oc-colon-flat+earth_earth+pony_pony_high+res_pointing_solo.png
>>165534
>I'm not butthurt at all
>D-don't mind that I replied to it 10 times!
The absolute state of Dubay trannies.
I can see that you're stuck too far up his gaping AIDs-ridden asshole to be convinced, but next time you tune in to one one his videos, pay attention to what he DOESN'T say just as much as you consider what he does.
Anonymous
No.165536
165537
f7g78ui.png
>>165535
(((They))) aren't sending their best anymore.
Goodnight.
Anonymous
No.165537
165538
0c8.png.acac4c5955353d4053f4cb859af906a7.png
>>165536
Of course they aren't. They're sending faggots like Eric and his orbiters.
Sweet dreams, tranny.
Anonymous
No.165538
165539
nugu.png
>>165537
In case you missed, take a look to the book title, faggot.
Anonymous
No.165539
165540
large (26).png
>>165538
>N-no you're the infiltrator! There's no way Eric could be!
I see you haven't actually gone to bed. Typical Dubay simp, just has to put one more word in when his husbando is insulted.
Next you're probably going to go crying to the mods like you do on all his platforms.
Anonymous
No.165540
165541 165542
>>165515
>>165517
You mean other than the pics and video that you keep choking except to claim 'debunked' without merit?
>>165524
Ngl, that IS interesting
>>165539
Thank you, that was hilarious. I hope you dont honestly think a flat earth is a credible position, but I appreciate you taking the time to indicate how unsupportable Dubay/OP is in their position.
Anonymous
No.165541
165542 165544
FXSi_V1UcAAIi59.png
>>165540
Watch your fucking mouth, globist.
Anonymous
No.165542
165543 165544
>>165540
>>165541
>coping
Seriously, would you mind to bring hard scientific facts instead of character assassination and straw mans?
Anonymous
No.165543
>>165542
>the burden of proof is on YOU, goy!
What do you want some bank receipt from his Jesuit overlords? You want me to get one from every other NASA shill in the world too? I guess I'll just call their accountant.
>His actions speak for themselves. Have you seen how hard he polices his chat forums? He's fine letting his troons regurgitate whatever he says, but when people try to actually take action he shuts down, silences and bans dissenters. If anyone ever dares to post the addresses of masonic lodges in his chats for the sake of organizing LEGAL protests/watches around them, he has us kicked immediately. He's the enemy of anyone who ever wants to take action to settle this movement nearly 70 years in the making, because he's made it about himself.
But we'll totally just beat the globers by converting one Facebook boomer at a time, amirite? No reason to organize around lodges? No reason to demand open debates? No reason to have independent research in the flat earth community? Surely, the problems will just fix themselves, right?
You are an eceleb-worshipping simp. You take any criticism of that troon-enabling racemixer as an affront to the movement, not a critique on his bloated ego. Flat earth was doing fine before he came about. We'd all be better off without him.
But surely, I'm just a shill, right? Surely NASA pays me to shitpost about him on this board, when you and I both know they have the resources to kill him and make it look like a yoga accident, if they actually wanted to that is (they don't).
Anonymous
No.165544
165545
>>165541
Theres that ignorant narcissism that flat earthers are known for. Post more ebin FB maymays yo!
>>165542
So, NOT the video of a supertanker very clearly, slowly, and deliberately crossing over the horizon, as well as a multitude of other evidence that any rational thinking person would realize refutes the whole premise?
Anonymous
No.165545
165547
mocking.png
>>165544
>perspective and refraction
Try again against a hard laser shore to shore. You can't beat that baller.
Anonymous
No.165547
165548
>>165545
>perspective and refraction explains why ships disappear over the horizon
As I said, ignorant narcissim
Speaking of lasers, I assume you have conducted the experiment?
Also speaking of lasers, thanks Bob
Anonymous
No.165548
165549
>>165547
My latest post was about that ship thing. The counter arguement that I found in this thread, it's relatively early in the thread, to the idea that ships "sinks" at the horizon because of the curvature was a video were a guy zoomed out from having a perfectly in view and then it disappeared into the horizon. I think it "sunk" as he zoomed out but it went a bit fast, so it's a bit hard to tell.

The explanation was that the image of the ship converges with the horizon and the first part of it is the bottom part of it. Kinda like foreshortening in drawing, the building's wall that is closests to you is larger then the wall further away but in reality they are both the same size.

I have tested and the horizon does indeed follow eye-level, at least for the height of a human being. Meaning, if you lay down or stand up the horizon follows. This means you test if these visual phenomena exists. All you need is a relatively short distance of flat ground and something to place at the end. Then you can lay down at the other end and if you can't see the object on this parallel and flat distance because the horizon obscures the bottom this phenomena exists and therefore puts the proof of ships sinking at the horizon in question. I haven't found a flat enough surface yet, the pitch I found had a hill in the middle of it. But Neil Tyson made this arguement in one of these videos so if this is true it shows that, he, a professional astrophysist and Ph.D guy, uses faulty proofs.

Anyway, I'm gonna try to find some flat surfaces.
Anonymous
No.165549
165550 165552 165778
>>165548
Yes, and thats a bullshit argument given that the zoom out occurs toward the end of the video, after the overwhelming majority of the ship has already slowly disappeared past the horizon.
And that says nothing of the dozens of pieces of evidence which OP has simply opted to ignore (read: ignorance) because he knows his only recourse is to either fuck off for a few days and come back with more FB memes, or to make non-arguments with le smug pony reaction.
Like thelaser gyroscope incident which IS LITERALLY NOT POSSIBLE on a flat earth.
For the record, Im NOT a globe advocate, Im actually a 'broken egg' advocate, which allows for BOTH the instances of curious findings/readings, WHILE acknowledging and allowing for OBVIOUS proof that the earth ISN'T flat, including and not limited to the laser gyroscope.
But OP isnt interested in coming to a consensus, he just wants to posture like him and Dubay are smarter than fucking EVERYONE, when their own 'evidence' doesnt pass muster.
Anonymous
No.165550
165551 165552
>>165549
>But OP isnt interested in coming to a consensus, he just wants to posture like him and Dubay are smarter than fucking EVERYONE
Jealous.
Anonymous
No.165551
>>165550
And theres the narcissism
Anonymous
No.165552
165554
>>165549
>Dubay
The problem with Dubay isn't him being narcissistic, ignorant or wrong. It's that he's intentionally manipulating other flat-earthers into only discussing the sterile flavor of dialog that his Jesuit masters deem to be acceptable and banning them whenever they drop real truth bombs or organize action to expose the masons.
The globe hoax will continue so long as controlled opposition like Dubay leads flat earth research.
>>165550
But of course his tranny orbiters will always spring to action to defend him. Dr. Rodchareon's sessions aren't cheap, right?
Keep up those yoga lessions. Try hard enough and a drunk might mistake you for FEMALE.
Anonymous
No.165554
165556
>>165552
>jesuits and masons
Oh, youre also intellectually lazy/dishonest. For sport, can you validate that position, or are you likewise "super duper sure"?
>globe hoax
Oh ffs, theres more of them.
Lads, you know who you are, I warned you this would happen.
Anonymous
No.165556
165560
large (27).png
>>165554
The Dubay clan are generational satanists with deep proven connections to the U.S. Army and CIA, and his disgusting Thai concubine is confirmed elite Thai Hofjuden of the Thai Royal Army (aka Masons). They troon-out their offspring from infancy in their perverse NWO Baphomet worship. Just look at his "father"'s feminine shoulder and hip proportions: evidentiary of being a FTM tranny. Eric himself was videotape crossdressing in 'his' youth.
He parades his orbiters with crumbs of truth while stopping them from looking at the big fish. That's IFERS was always so heavily moderated. That's why he keeps banning people for asking too many questions, making constructive criticisms: his JOB is to control the narrative to keep FE under NWO control, so that (((they))) get to decide what gets released and when through the mouth of their false-prophet glow-op whore.
Anonymous
No.165557
165560 165774
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S82LeZG_Ojs
Anonymous
No.165560
165568
>>165556
>>165557
That was excellent anon. 5/5 stars, your video confirmed a LOT of things I had intuited.
However, it neglects the point that the Earth is demonstrably not flat. Not saying it's 'round' like contemporary science suggests it is (which I refute btw) but it is conclusively not flat, and if you are wont to suggest it is,... well die in fire cuz you're lost the plot.
Anonymous
No.165568
165569
>>165560
>it neglects the point that the Earth is demonstrably not flat.
Of course not, the plane has some mountains in the middle.
Anonymous
No.165569
165570
>>165568
My only hope for this thread is that you'll realize what an insipid fuckwit you are, and lament all the bullshit you have spewn from your fingertips.
Though, there's no doubt that you'll ever admit to it, such is the narcissism you have liberally displayed.
I don't contest that there are issues with the professed globe model, I've admitted it previously; having said, a rational person could use the multitude of evidence - yours included - to conclude that the earth is not flat. That you persist is on you, and I wish you well in that realization.
Anonymous
No.165570
165572
>>165569
Don't forget about the firmament, and the gravity hoax.
Anonymous
No.165572
>>165570
Yes, the firmament and gravity hoax - as depicted by ignorant retards - is also completely false, baseless, and the sort of thing only a child who likewise believes in Santa Claus would deem credible, thanks for the reminder.
Anonymous
No.165573
And yes, I did phrase that to allow you to posture more. Do be so kind
Anonymous
No.165578
165579 165581 165942
File (hide): 7A665D474099D45C59FAAA24024CD3EA-7061471.mp4 (6.7 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:24, LOCAL SUN.mp4) [play once] [loop]
LOCAL SUN.mp4
It doesn't look like the sun is millions of miles away at all.
Anonymous
No.165579
165580
>>165578
Only if you're retarded
Anonymous
No.165580
what.png
>>165579
How so?
Anonymous
No.165581
165590
>>165578
How doesn't it?
Anonymous
No.165590
>>165581
Who doesn't it?
Anonymous
No.165594
Meanwhile
https://youtube.com/shorts/T0f6u39jlRA?feature=share
Carl Sagan explaining how ancient Greeks knew the Earth is round
Anonymous
No.165723
165724 165729
Serious question for non-flatties:
Which of the following conspiracy theory groups is MORE plausible?
Flat Earth
-or-
Q anon
?
Anonymous
No.165724
165725
>>165723
Q Anon is the belief that there are good Jews, which is bollocks. It's clearly a Psyop to convince the boomers to sit around and do nothing.
The world turning out to be flat all along is impossible, and more likely than the existence of a good Jew.
Anonymous
No.165725
165726
>>165724
So, you acknowledge that they are comparably ridiculous, impossible, and lacking any evidence that can pass basoc standards?
Anonymous
No.165726
165727
what.png
>>165725
>conflating the Q psyop with well documented and undeniable Flat Earth
Ahem. Have you even read this bread?
Anonymous
No.165727
>>165726
Glow harder faggot
Anonymous
No.165729
>>165723
QAnon is just a bunch of other individual conspiracy theories lumped together by feds to discredit them. It included stuff like Epstein sex trafficking and other plausible scenarios.
Anonymous
No.165737
165739
13.jpeg

Anonymous
No.165739
>>165737
How is this confusing?
When you're at the south pole, every direction is north.
If you were at some ice ring, any place on the ring would be facing north.
Anonymous
No.165771
165774
1f9837468fb4b771.jpg
>How Can Ushuaia Get 17 Hours of Daylight on a Flat Earth?
>During December every year Ushuaia, Argentina, the southern-most city in the world, just below the 54th southern latitude receives over 17 hours of daylight with a maximum of 17 hours and 20 minutes occurring on the Winter Solstice. Globe Earthers often claim this would be impossible on a flat Earth arguing that a local, revolving, spotlight Sun should not be able to illuminate such a southern location for so long.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/How-Can-Ushuaia-Get-17-Hours-of-Daylight-on-a-Flat-Earth:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p1BIY7u71dS9/
Anonymous
No.165774
165775 165794
>>165771
>the dome firmament is solid glass
Keep grasping at straws, dumbass
>>165557
Frenly reminder
Anonymous
No.165775
165776 165777 165779 165780
9ed6a.png
>>165774
>firmament is solid glass
Your words, not Dubay's
>Dubay exposed
Already debunked.
Anonymous
No.165776
>>165775
No, those are definitely his words. So, how does air travel work if the dome is solid? Cuz a hemisphere prism doesnt leave room for,... mountains, for example.
Anonymous
No.165777
165794
1538329986868.jpg
>>165775
2:52 - "If our Earth plane is covered by a crystalline translucent dome firmament"
Anonymous
No.165778
165781 165790
>>165549
>Yes, and thats a bullshit argument given that the zoom out occurs toward the end of the video, after the overwhelming majority of the ship has already slowly disappeared past the horizon.
Sorry, I don't really follow, could you elaborate.
Anonymous
No.165779
>>165775
>debunked
Citation needed
Anonymous
No.165780
>>165775
Where was that debunked?
Anonymous
No.165781
165807
>>165778
Begging your pardon, but I just spent an hour trying to sift through this whole fucking thread, just to find the video, and I still havent, so no I cant give a more comprehensive answer tha. To refer3nce these stills, which are clearly at the sameleve of zoom.
>>164572
Anonymous
No.165790
165807
>>165778
Found it!
>>163405
So. In this video, we watch the slow and painstaking process of supertanker making a right turn while descending over the horizon. Yes, the videographer zooms out and back in on occasion, however the zoom out and in occurs very fast, and couldn't cause the viewer to think that the slow, gradual dissapearance over the horizon has anything to do with the zoom.
Unless you're a flat earth glownigger like OP, that is
Anonymous
No.165794
165795
>>165777
>If our Earth plane is covered by a crystalline translucent dome firmament"
It is very different to:
>>165774
>firmament is solid glass

Would you mind to take some English comprehension classes?
Anonymous
No.165795
165797
>>165794
The effect was produced by a solid prism.
Unless this is crystal magic where a crystal dome produces the same effect as a prism, you're full of shit and you know it, glownigger.
Anonymous
No.165796
>inb4 some mlp image from the crystal empire against sombra n shit
Anonymous
No.165797
165798
>>165795
>The effect was produced by a solid prism
Actually a solid semi-sphere, then Dubay introduces the gas ionization phenomena and the difference between sunlight and day light.
Don't be a faggot a stop lying.
Anonymous
No.165798
165800
>>165797
So for the record, are you staking the claim that ionized gas produces a prismic effect?
Yes, it's a hemisphere but its still prismic (as in, effect), by your insistence.
Anonymous
No.165800
165801
1pcs-Prism-Laser-Beam-Combine-Cube-Prism-for-405nm-450nm-Blue-Laser-Diode-5W-for-Optical.jpg
sneha-b-volume-of-triangular-prism-07-1606298603.png
>>165798
>prismic effect?
Anon, it is obvious that gasses don't meet the prism definition. You are confusing the term perhaps with light diffusion (Physics 101).
Anonymous
No.165801
>>165800
However you did insist on a transparent mysterious solid dome which does fall on as prismatic effect, not only that the speed of light through the various mediums should be calculatable as with the energy required.
Some fuckery is going on.
Not only that but everything that goes on everywhere has to be described in detail and all the stuff has to match up.
I mean this should be a trifle really, in a solid dome the fuck is space rocks that land.
Anonymous
No.165802
165803
dRBDrCrnHQrNyOwH32sl8Kpn.jpg
>Flat Earth - Meteors, Comets and Craters
>Meteors, meteorites, asteroids, comets, and shooting stars are not what you have been led to believe.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/FlatEarth-MeteorsCometsandCraters:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ZogXzFn5Vqw/
Anonymous
No.165803
165804
>>165802
>"Space junk don't exist dumbass."
- Eric "Sphereroids? More like hemorrhoids." Dubay
Anonymous
No.165804
4700.png
>>165803
There's another interesting theory about objects falling from the dome. Not substantiated but it gives food for thought.
>Meteors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3TVlW8PXkw
Anonymous
No.165807
165808
>>165781
>>165790
Thanks for your reply.
I was actually thinking of these videos, reposting them here for the ease of access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk&ab_channel=EricDubay
6:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
3:14
What do you think about them? The timestamps are the ones that discuss ship's hulls going over the horizon first.
Anonymous
No.165808
165810
>>165807
But again, that's horseshit.
When we're talking about ladies walking, or cars driving, the relative area where the distortive visual effect is at MAX 2', which is acceptable given the threshold of the distortion.

In the video I provided, we're talking about watching AN ENTIRE SUPERTANKER, OVER 100' TALL, SLOWLY CROSS THE VISUAL THRESHOLD OF THE HORIZON.

We are not the same.
Anonymous
No.165809
R.jpg

Anonymous
No.165810
>>165808
To further clarify this point.
According to Eric Bidet, the proportion of the distorted object (ship) that is obscured is relative to the distance and pverall volume. Meaning, as something becomes more distant and miniscule, the more of it's body becomes obscured, at least if the earth was flat. Which it is not.
You can tell using the ship video, because the overwhelming width of the ship is quite prominent right up until the point that it disappears over the horizon.
Again to Bidet's assertion, the proportion of the vehicle that is distorted should be relative to the overall volume. Thats observably not the case. The entire height of the ship dsappears over the horizon WELL before the width does so. Unless they sailed into a sea of piranha solution, and that supertanker got dissolved from the base up, it is impossible for the flat earth model to account for the ship's disappearance, no matter HOW many straws of 'perspective' and 'zoom' one grasps at.
Simply put, when one comprehends physics, math, proportion, etc. - regardless of what their opinion of round/flat earth - that ONE video conclusively proves that the earth is not flat.
Which is also why OP won't touch that video with a 10 foot pole.
That he persists with this flat earth nonsense while knowing that his position is literally impossible - no matter how much rhetoric/pilpul he attempts - is the cause by which I assert he's a filthy glownigger, probably tasked with monitoring/obfuscating site activity (and most likely, just one of hundreds who have been sent to various chan-boards to keep an eye out for any Christchurch-esque activity).
Having said and having grasped his motivation, his position has long since been illustrated as arguing in bad faith, intellectually dishonest, as well as laughably unsupportable, excepting individuals one or more standard deviations of intellect below the average.
Anonymous
No.165811
File (hide): 5286C713B6E91776908B6DE325B3DAB6-8979758.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:47, FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4
>FLAT EARTH MOON MAP WITH AMAZING DETAILS
Neither the source or content can be proven. Take it with two grains of salt and healthy skepticism.
Anonymous
No.165812
>Im just gonna ignore the elephant in the room, the thread
Anonymous
No.165814
165815
I'm still right about flat eattherism.
Anonymous
No.165815
165818
>>165814
Yes, but you'll never get an admission from OP. It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
>inb4 hurr, it shows a flat earth
>inb4 your words not mine
Anonymous
No.165818
165819
feStEGTcxW.jpg
>>165815
>It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
What a coincidence, because the same may apply to (you).
Anonymous
No.165819
165820
>>165818
>n... no u!
Factually and evidently incorrect.
My assessment of (you) is based on observation and your displayed behavior. I'm perfectly open to theories that have evidential merit, and I am on record with a 'whackjob' theory of my own. And yet, I manage to avoid patronizing anons, dismissing their positions without merit (I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless) and outright ignoring evidence I can't contest.

No no, again, that's just (you)
Anonymous
No.165820
165831 165832
2134215__safe_screencap_trixie_pony_unicorn_a+horse+shoe-dash-in_cropped_disbelief_faic_female_frown_mare_reaction+image_solo_trixie+is+not+amused_unamused.png
>>165819
>(I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless)
... Why? Why are you entertaining this retard with your attention?
You seem to have already understood that he can't be convinced, so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him? What are you trying to prove?
Anonymous
No.165830
File (hide): E9B10644C5078B588E86B263C2F39F60-12152650.mp4 (11.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:03, WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4
Psalms+19 1+The+heavens+declare+the+glory+of+God;+and+the+firmament+sheweth+his+handywork..jpg
WW2 and Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165831
165832
>>165820
>so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him?
Wise advise.
Anonymous
No.165832
165833 165834 165838
>>165820
>>165831
A. Because ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
B. Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
C. Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
... to name a few
Anonymous
No.165833
facehoof.png
>>165832
(you) cannot please everyponer.
Anonymous
No.165834
165835
c'mon.png
>>165832
>tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
>largesse
I'm impressed.
>faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
A bit over the top. Don't (you) think?
Anonymous
No.165835
165836
>>165834
>over the top
Not at all. If he was posing the question/ideas to have a discussion, discuss the merits admit/acknowledge the flaws, and engage in GOOD faith dialogue/exchange, then yes, that would be over the top. IF that's what he was doing.
Anonymous
No.165836
165837
>>165835
>IF that's what he was doing.
He said it in the OP, it is about to debunking the globe.
Anonymous
No.165837
>>165836
Reiterating, if he was doing so in good faith, there would be no contest.
Anonymous
No.165838
165839
>>165832
>ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
No it isn't. You can't go arguing with every retard on a chansite.
>Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
That's none of your business; and no, they wouldn't.
>Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
Over the past year+ of arguing, you have not succeeded in making him leave. This isn't worth your attention.
Anonymous
No.165839
165840
>>165838
>tries to conflate Mlpol with all other chansites, including 4chan
Get fucked, our demographics are way different than other chans, the circumstances are entirely different and so the strategy must also be proprietary. Additionally, I don't argue with every asshole on the site because A. Most assholes dont persist for literal years with a conclusively fallacious premise and B. Because for some reason, people tend to leave the flatty alone.
>none of your business
Get fucked, this site IS my business. Its called TAKING responsibility. If (you) knew the first thing about it, we wouldnt be having this cpnversation/issue.
>he hasnt left, not worth your attention
Oh, so now you're concerned with how I value my time? Get fucked thrice. The intent is not to make him leave, (tho it would be nice) the intent is to cement in his and other eager flatties looking for a beachhead of sorts that these ideas and the pilpul methods of asserting then will NOT go unopposed, and will be readily destroyed at leisure, often casually.
Anonymous
No.165840
165842
>>165839
Okay, fine. Argue with him all you want, but for the love of god, sage your posts so the rest of us don't have to see this thread at the top of the overboard/catalog every day.
Anonymous
No.165842
165843
>>165840
>Im the reason its on the overboard
Glad you mentioned it.
Why are /vx/ threads on perma-bump? Is it cuz the /vx/ threads are of such quality that exceeds even mainboard threads? Or is there something else to it?
Anonymous
No.165843
165845
>>165842
Sounds like an interesting discussion for /qa/. No idea why the /vx/ catalog is like this.

In the meantime, remember to sage. You're not the only one who argues with OP. I do it too on occasion, but I sage the thread so as to not give it extra attention. Just because OP bumps it doesn't mean you have to.
Anonymous
No.165845
165846
>>165843
>sage
Respectfully declined
>I dont know why
I do, and were it not for this thread it wouldnt be an issue. Unfortunately, this thread enjoys the fruits of the otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/, which stymies the natural user rejection of such threads as these, if it was to either hit bump limit and be remade or be bumplocked and still be remade.
>/qa/
Riiiiiiiiiight. I'll add it to my letter to Santa while I'm at it.
Anonymous
No.165846
165848
>>165845
>otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/
What utility?
Anonymous
No.165847
Flat eartherism is a jewish psyop
Anonymous
No.165848
165849
>>165846
Why, for the rp games, of course that is, the ones other than dick strangler's, who insists on posting to the mainboard cuz... reasons
Anonymous
No.165849
165851
>>165848
I don't think perma-bumping threads necessarily help games. Making new threads isn't that hard.
Anonymous
No.165851
>>165849
Well, when I was running a game, I insisted that my threads be immediately bump locked, but I had a hard on for AVOIDING the main page and then later, the overboard.
But current GMs,... ahem insist that it is too troublesome for players to check the thread(s), and further that lol the audience see when there's activity.
spoiler alert: it ain't gonna change
Anonymous
No.165852
165853 165855 165856 165877
Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it.
Anonymous
No.165853
165854
>>165852
Consider saging in the meantime if you don't want it to bump.
It's not hard.
Anonymous
No.165854
>>165853
Thats true, it isnt. But neither is the problem going to be properly addressed if I do so again, respectfully declined.
Anonymous
No.165855
165856 165861 165863
disgusting.png
>>165852
>Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it
One thing is your non-stop screeching because you would have to admit you were living a lie. But to sabotage a thread with bump-locking is totally a different league and shows how far, and low, you are willing to go to silence the opinions and facts you don't like.
Very commie of you.
Anonymous
No.165856
165861
rgeb39n8s.png
>>165855
>non-stop screeching
>to silence the opinions and facts you don't like
>Very commie of you.
I wonder if >>165852 is circumcised.
Anonymous
No.165861
>>165855
>>165856
Theres the intellectual honesty this thread is known for
Anonymous
No.165862
Who am I kidding, thats the intellectual honesty the site has been known for, these days.
Anonymous
No.165863
165864
>>165855
>sabotage
This right here. OP considers it sabotage to NOT be able to bump this shit in perpetuity
Anonymous
No.165864
165869
pinkie pie ---haters---.gif
>>165863
Imagine the haters if this thread crosses the 10,000 posts milestone.
Anonymous
No.165866
Nigger.
Anonymous
No.165869
>>165864
Imagine being so narcissistic to think that not always being on the overboard is censorship
Anonymous
No.165870
silly.jpg

Pupper
## Admin
No.165871
165892
Due to technical concerns brought up by users, bump limit on /vx/ has been lowered to 2,147,483,647. We apologize for any problems that the overly high bump limit has caused.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165874
165892
derpytech5.gif
I want to thank all of our concerned users for pointing out the critical flaw in our bump system that has been with us for years.
https://mlpol.net/vx/50370
https://mlpol.net/vx/51841
https://mlpol.net/vx/53728
https://mlpol.net/vx/55271
https://mlpol.net/vx/58626
https://mlpol.net/vx/60316

Look at those pathetic reply numbers that effectively organizes a campaign of such a scale. The need for a patch to the number of replies was long overdue. We have now solved this issue effective immediately.
Anonymous
No.165875
165876
Tbh, the bump limits on all of the boards are too high.
But the fact that /vx/ has no bump limit and no archive makes it stand out.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165876
165878
>>165875
There was a bump limit of a ridiculous 2000. Far too small to be of use as the examples on the board show. We have now patched this. To think we almost got to that number naturally if we didn't get alerted to the problem.
Anonymous
No.165877
>>165852
There is no reason to single this thread out among any of the others on /vx/.
I think bump limits should be fixed, but not in a way that targets any particular thread.
Anonymous
No.165878
165880
>>165876
What's the bump limit now?
Imo, it shouldn't be higher than 500, which is the highest it ever was back on 4chan (for faster boards like /a/ and /v/). I really don't think there's any reason for them to be higher than that.
Anonymous
No.165879
165880
Even a bump limit of 300 would be large, considering the speed of this board.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165880
165881
>>165878
>>165879
Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647. The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread. We have now fixed this short-sighted stance.
Anonymous
No.165881
165882
add.gif
>>165880
>The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread.
I remember this. Imo, that was a mistake...
Imo, its why I care about this issue, because I feel like I contributed to the problem by selfishly requesting that the bump limits be increased for those RP threads back in the day, without consideration for the long-term damage it would do to the site. I've since realized that that was probably a bad idea.
>Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647.
Oh, I see this is a shitpost.
Shitposting aside, could we maybe talk about this in /qa/? There's already a thread up on the topic: >>>/qa/5974 → I don't want to shit-up this thread, even if some other Anons would rather discuss their meta grievances here for some reason...
Bump limits have been an issue I've been trying to raise awareness of for a while, and I think it's worth some more serious discussion.
Anonymous
No.165882
165884
>>165881
>probably a bad idea
You could have listened
Anonymous
No.165884
>>165882
I don't recall you making a big scene when the decision was made either. It's not like we don't have an entire board for meta issues.
Anonymous
No.165891
234r.jpg
>Eric Dubay
>Why isn't Polaris Visible from Australia?
>Globe Earthers are taught the reason that the North Pole Star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular Earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, they claim these boats and the Pole Star are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the Earth was truly a stationary plane that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-isn't-Polaris-Visible-from-Australia-:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cULQxgB1pmK/
Anonymous
No.165892
>>165871
>>165874
Lmao, this feud with Samurais is getting old.
Anonymous
No.165894
165895 165974
b202f525cc93423f.png

Anonymous
No.165895
>>165894
To make it more accurate, make the CIA glownigger look like less of a chad and make the flat earther retard on a leash also babble about magic and psychic powers and History Channel-tier ancient alien nonsense to distract people from the jews in banks and government.
Anonymous
No.165941
File (hide): A472CB788F6E9748749B91A39ACDAEF4-2591708.mp4 (2.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:59, the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4
Cracking the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.165942
165943
>>165578
but the moon is demonstrably at least 20,000 kilometers away, big think
Anonymous
No.165943
>>165942
>demonstrably
How?
Anonymous
No.165952
File (hide): 093FACE42C03B13A524CF83E453D0745-12010054.mp4 (11.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:06:42, Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4
>Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals
Just a theory.
Anonymous
No.165956
facebook_1663288789495_6976338822936040640.jpg

Anonymous
No.165957
165958
Hey, Pettan niggers.
If the earth is flat why does centrifugal force let slings work?
Anonymous
No.165958
165965
mocking.png
>>165957
Anonymous
No.165965
165968
>>165958
pettan means flat in asian
Anonymous
No.165968
haters gonna hate.gif
>>165965
Anonymous
No.165972
165973
File (hide): 18D0EB81F9E167F51ED805668BEBCFCB-2553600.mp4 (2.4 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:53, Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4

Anonymous
No.165973
>>165972
Now you're just being silly.
Anonymous
No.165974
165977
>>165894
It is wrong to assume that retards are glownigger plants just because they make a community look bad. Dealing with retards is, sadly, a consequence of being a haven of free speech.
That being said, I have no doubt that glowies plant bullshit on altchans and other free speech forums to discredit places like this.
Anonymous
No.165977
165978
map.jpg
>>165974
Glowniggers do indeed promote the controlled opposition "Flat Earth Society" website. Plenty of politicians and NASA propagandists mention it over and over again for character assassination purposes. That said, experiments don't find any curvature, so the whole ball shaped scam does go down in flames.
Anonymous
No.165978
165979
>>165977
>experiments don't find any curvature
You mean the experiments that you've accepted.
Anonymous
No.165979
165980
>>165978
Actually they are experiments that most people can reproduce, which is the very definition of science sticking to the Scientific Method.
Anonymous
No.165980
165982
>>165979
As opposed to the ones that showed the opposite and could still be reproduced?
Anonymous
No.165981
ball shaped earth - why lie.jpg
>Why Would They Lie About Flat Earth? - (6:37 long)
>When confronted with blatant NASA lies and obvious globe inconsistencies, the #1 most common frequently asked question is undoubtedly: but why would anyone lie about the shape of the Earth!? For what purpose would there be a multi-generational worldwide conspiracy to cover up the truth of our home? Why would NASA spend billions of dollars building rockets just to prank the population about outer space? What on Earth would be the point of hiding the flat Earth?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/WhyWouldTheyLieAboutFlatEarth:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKOj2zORvKUo/
Anonymous
No.165982
165983
>>165980
>the ones that showed the opposite
Glad you brought it. The very definition of science is that it is not fixed or settled, never ever. Independent experiments unraveled the conspiracy wide open and the scam is undeniable.
Anonymous
No.165983
165985
>>165982
>it is not fixed or settled, never ever
>the scam is undeniable.
How can you say that it's not fixed or settled, and then immediately say that it's "undeniable"? Are you even listening to yourself?
Anonymous
No.165985
165986
>>165983
You are confusing physical phenomena with an agreement among conspirators to lie about the former.
Anonymous
No.165986
165989
>>165985
See, that's what I'm talking about. You just dimiss any experiments that disprove your worldview on the basis that they're conspiring against you. Anyone who comes up with a result that indicates curvature of the earth must be lying.
That's the purest form of ad homenim.
Anonymous
No.165989
165990 165991
>>165986
Not quite. Given that experiments paid and promoted by masons and their proxies are done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them, and therefore not suitable for replication, their claims are highly in doubt.
Think about it, people are not able to build an airship, like a zeppelin, and go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation.
Anonymous
No.165990
165992
>>165989
That's just attacking the character of the scientist, and not refuting the substance of the experiment themselves.
>done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them
Have you considered just attacking a camera to a high altitude balloon and letting it fly up into the atmosphere? Even schools can do that; and they do so all the time. Try it yourself.
Or just putting sticks in the sand at different locations and measuring the shadows of their angles. Even the ancient Greeks could do that.
There are so, so, so many sources unaffiliated with NASA or masons or whatever you want to call them that can be independently verified. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just dismiss all of them because they didn't come to the conclusion that you wanted them to.
Anonymous
No.165991
165993
>>165989
>go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation
Japanese fishermen go to Antarctica to poach endangered whales all of the time. It's not that hard.
Anonymous
No.165992
165994
>>165990
Ahem.
If it cannot be replicated and then when taking a different approach to confirm the mason experiments you find out that it is all rubbish... Then what else you can say?
Anonymous
No.165993
165996
>>165991
Do they cross the 60th south parallel? I don't think so.
Anonymous
No.165994
165995
>>165992
>Then what else you can say?
Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake, and check to see if the researchers didn't account for variables.
Then you peer review the experiments and over time continue to reevaluate them until a contemporary understanding is reached.
>mason experiments
Or teenagers with a weather balloon.
Anonymous
No.165995
165996
>>165994
>Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake
This whole bread is about that, and the mounting evidence against the ball hoax is overwhelming.
Anonymous
No.165996
165997 165999
>>165995
I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>overwhelming
And at that point you're just exaggerating. It's easy to make odds look like that if you dismiss any opposing viewpoint as a shill.
Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
>>165993
Yes. Hungry Japs will go anywhere.
Anonymous
No.165997
165998
>>165996
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
Anonymous
No.165998
>>165997
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
Anonymous
No.165999
166000
>>165996
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
Anonymous
No.166000
166001
>>165999
Just use a different focus then. It's not hard. The curve is visible.
Anonymous
No.166001
166003
File (hide): E3B5FDBDEB509D20579D0318DA084923-3896174.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:400x224 Length:00:03:37, 81beee.mp4) [play once] [loop]
81beee.mp4
>>166000
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.

Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
Anonymous
No.166002
405b.png

Anonymous
No.166003
166004
>>166001
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
Anonymous
No.166004
166005
what.png
>>166003
>the camera isn't turning at all
Anonymous
No.166005
166006
>>166004
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
Anonymous
No.166006
166007
>>166005
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
Anonymous
No.166007
166008
>>166006
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
Anonymous
No.166008
166009
>>166007
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
Anonymous
No.166009
166010
>>166008
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
Anonymous
No.166010
166011
>>166009
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
Anonymous
No.166011
166012 166014
>>166010
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
Anonymous
No.166012
166013
>>166011
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166013
166015
>>166012
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
Anonymous
No.166014
166016
>>166011
Search this thread for "laser", very interesting the results indeed.
Anonymous
No.166015
166018
>>166013
>Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve
Post them.
Anonymous
No.166016
166017
>>166014
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
Anonymous
No.166017
166018
>>166016
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
Anonymous
No.166018
166019 166020
>>166015
Jeran Campanella's experiment in his documentary where he did it trying to prove the earth was flat, but hit a bump when his laser showed the opposite of what he was trying to prove.
>>166017
Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Anonymous
No.166019
166021
>>166018
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
Anonymous
No.166020
166021
>>166018
>Jeran Campanella's experiment
Post it.
Anonymous
No.166021
166022
>>166020
It's in his 2018 documentary. I'm sure you've heard about it.
>>166019
So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
Anonymous
No.166022
166023
>>166021
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
Anonymous
No.166023
166024
>>166022
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
Anonymous
No.166024
166025
>>166023
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
Anonymous
No.166025
166026
>>166024
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
Anonymous
No.166026
166027
earth-curvature-scale.jpg
>>166025
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166027
166028
>>166026
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
Anonymous
No.166028
166031
lafweawee.png
>>166027
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
Anonymous
No.166031
>>166028
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
Anonymous
No.166039
2312.png
>SHADOWS NEVER INTERSECT - (3:32 long)
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
Anonymous
No.166043
File (hide): 50767598B2A63BDCFA60B75252D06FCB-3722834.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:34, Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4
>Southern Stars Quick Take
Anonymous
No.166046
UdBKz0kw-92932349-461x1024.jpeg