/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2570 replies and 1311 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.167462
167465
>>167458
You know, Genchink chinkpact's story might be putrid garbage (it is), but the lore is actually pretty neat.
Your post sound like something directly taken from the game, for example.
Anonymous
No.167465
sunbeam.gif
>>167462
Huh? Intresting ^^
Anonymous
No.167504
167509 167516
main-qimg-3b4e5db84d572d582645fec5e1a4b301.jpeg
1515151515151515.jpeg

Anonymous
No.167509
167513
>>167504
That's not the Earth's shadow at all. What you're looking at is the normal appearance of the moon: a bit over half of the moon is illuminated by the sun, while the dark side is dark because it's opposite to the side facing the sun. This is how moon phases work; they have nothing to do with the earth's shadow.

The Earth's shadow only moves in front of the moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens during full moons when the sun is on the opposite side of the earth, relative to the observer's position.
I strongly encourage you to go out at night and watch a lunar eclipse next time one happens in your area: they're not that uncommon. You can watch the Earth's rounded shadow steadily move over the moon in real time (it happens over the course of an hour, unlike moon phases, which take a month). It looks a lot more like the right pic you posted.
Anonymous
No.167512
maxresdefault.jpg
>The Moon Mystery and the Translucent Stars in 4K - (4:07 long)
>I see stars through the moon.
>I show here unedited photos of me with a 16 MegaPixel resolution. Watch the video on a large screen in a dark environment to see all the details. That's why I produced the video in 4K resolution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EuLUTmEgMs
Anonymous
No.167513
167515 167516
>>167509
>while the dark side is dark because it's opposite to the side facing the sun. This is how moon phases work; they have nothing to do with the earth's shadow.
According to the astronomers, the moon phases have everything to do with the Earth' shadow.
Anonymous
No.167515
>>167513
>According to the astronomers, the moon phases have everything to do with the Earth' shadow.
No, they absolutely do not. If you're going to say "according to astronomers", at least cite which ones.
They teach this in middle school, ffs.
Anonymous
No.167516
Moon-phases_cropped2.jpg
lunar-phases-by-Orion-8.jpg
>>167513
>>167504
You are talking out your ass, there are no astronomers who say moon phases have anything to do with the Earth's shadow. Shadows only come into play during lunar eclipses, which are NOT the same as moon phases. Astronomers all say says it's based on the moon's relative position to the sun from ground perspective.
(These graphics are not to scale, but they sum up the concept)

Have you never seen a lunar eclipse before? It's possible that at least one has happened in your lifetime wherever you live.
Anonymous
No.167631
167632
lesson-explaining-deep-subject-evidence-provide-contradict-cognitive-dissonance.jpg
Globers' profound dishonesty.
>Have you ever noticed when explaining a deep subject, no matter how much evidence you provide to some people they will still fight you on it? Not because it's wrong, but because it contradicts everything they've been taught... This is called Cognitive Dissonance.
Anonymous
No.167632
>>167631
Tell us how lunar eclipses work.
Anonymous
No.167635
SOME MORE FLAT EARTH COMMON SENSE TRUTH THAT MAKE YOU SAY HUMMM .mp4
Some more Flat Earth common sense truth that will make you say hummm 🤔
Anonymous
No.167636
167639
movin2.jpg
movin5.jpg

Anonymous
No.167639
167645 167646
>>167636
Didn't we discuss weeks ago that the technology is still existant in theory but the hardware dismantled and unmaintained due to lack of interest/funding?
We could go back if people actually wanted to, although I assume that the people claiming space isn't real aren't interested in that.
Anonymous
No.167645
167651
derpy - laughing.gif
>>167639
>We could go back if people actually wanted to
That's a good one.
Anonymous
No.167646
167650
>>167639
>Didn't we discuss weeks ago that the technology is still existant
It is not if all blueprints were banished. Then no one can push fraud charges.
Anonymous
No.167649
WHO WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY 2016 POPE PUTIN JOHN KERRY.mp4
Rarity_wondering_about_e-mails_EG.jpg
>WHO WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY 2016 - POPE, PUTIN, JOHN KERRY.
What's going on there?
Anonymous
No.167650
>>167646
>all blueprints were banished
They weren't though. The only tech that's sealed is the technology related to our intercontinental ballistic missile system.
Anonymous
No.167651
>>167645
Maybe "if people actually devoted the right time, resources and investment into" is the right term.
But no, the government just keeps sending money to niggers and Israel instead.
Anonymous
No.167652
20230616_000954.png

Anonymous
No.167655
167670
RDT_20230617_0422227001748350842309532.jpg
The photo that NASA doesn't want you to see
Anonymous
No.167670
File (hide): BF5A9BBE1AC93E18F3FB963E02E2AA36-3681175.mp4 (3.5 MB, Resolution:852x480 Length:00:02:10, Exposing NASA fake imagery.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Exposing NASA fake imagery.mp4
>>167655
>The photo that NASA doesn't want you to see
Aha!
Let's find out what is about NASA's fake pics.
Anonymous
No.167917
168058
20230626_201819.png

Anonymous
No.168058
>>167917
Twilight knows the truth.
Anonymous
No.168059
168060
RioMoon.jpg

Anonymous
No.168060
168061
>>168059
Excellent picture, but what's this have to do with flat earth?
Anonymous
No.168061
168062 168064
Mw9wEpv.gif
>>168060
Perhaps to show appreciation for the plasma disk?
Anonymous
No.168062
168063 168064
>>168061
For a disk of plasma, it sure seems to have an interesting 2D map. Almost like the object is 3D and has craters which are visible at different times. Unless plasma takes forms that have the appearance of craters which don't shift while observed, yet repeats the same patterns.
Anonymous
No.168063
168064
mlpol.jpeg
>>168062
>Almost like the object is 3D and has craters which are visible at different times
>3D
Interesting theory, but there is a problem. If the moon is a ball in space, how so all the craters are perpendicular and not even one shows an angular impact?
Anonymous
No.168064
168065 168069
>>168061
The sun is plasma (among other things). The moon is quite visibly a solid body of material, as those exact craters haven't observably changed since time immemorable. Plasma is fluid, and wouldn't have distinctive craters and ridges for any considerable period (although it could still have them briefly, such as with sun spots).
But overall, this still isn't super relevant to flat earth, aside from vague implied criticism of conventional astrology, which is I guess is barely relevant to the narrative.
This is my first time hearing a proposition that the moon is flat though, although imo that's even less believable than flat earth, because the curve of the moon is unironically, literally, easily visible, as per >>168062 explains

>>168063
>not even one shows an angular impact?
They literally do. You can see the minute elliptical ovals and rides to indicate impact angle. Some of them are shaped like long streaks. There are entire teams of people dedicated to mapping the geological (lunarlogical?)history of the moons craters to determine what caused them and approximately how long ago. The craters have names and measurements and very detailed mapping. You just need to look closer to them (as with a telescope).
Anonymous
No.168065
168066 168070
>>168064
>They literally do. You can see the minute elliptical ovals and rides to indicate impact angle. Some of them are shaped like long streaks.
Show me those shapep like long streaks please.
Also, if the fake Newtonian law is applied, there is a discrepancy with Earth, supposedly both, Earth and Moon are celestial bodies under the same gravitational laws, but on Earth no meteorite has never ever fell perpendicularly. Strange, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.168066
168067
>>168065
>no meteorite has never ever fell perpendicularly.
Is this a typo?
Anonymous
No.168067
>>168066
yup
Anonymous
No.168069
168070
>>168064
>But overall, this still isn't super relevant to flat earth
Astronomy is indeed, those firmament lights are very relevant as they are components of this realm.
Anonymous
No.168070
168071 168072
>>168065
I don't know why its so important that they come in perpendicular, because there's a lot of angles that they could approach from, especially if they fell from an elliptical orbit around the earth. Meteors typically come at a an elliptical angle, which is why you can see those long trails of smoke stretching across the sky after they land.
They would only come in at a semi-perpendicular angle if they hit the earth at a particular angle, and more importantly at incredibly high speed and mass to have not orbited the earth or slingshotted around it for any period, but instead just hit it directly. Those kind of huge heavy objects barreling towards the earth are rather rare, even among meteor impacts (thank God). I think the most iconic example would be the one would be the one that smashed into the gulf of Mexico during the late Cretaceous period, which seemed to have just barreled right towards the planet and hit it directly and bringing it's destruction with it.
>>168069
Well, maybe next time post some context/argument with the picture if you have an actual point to make, instead of just image-dumping.
Thing is, the earth and moon being flat are actually two separate cosmological debates. If I proved to you the moon was round, it wouldn't necessarily prove the earth was, and vise versa. You could hypothetically have a flat earth and round moon, or a round earth and flat moon.
If you want to continue this, go ahead and post more arguments/evidence for flat moon, but it feels like a red herring for the flat earth discussion.
Anonymous
No.168071
168074
77be960de18e35e13d06bfbde3e47239-field.png
>>168070
Forgot pic. This was the trail of one that landed on a sorry guy's house last may. It did indeed come at an elliptical angle.
Gosh I'm tired.
Anonymous
No.168072
168073
>>168070
>Well, maybe next time post some context/argument with the picture if you have an actual point to make, instead of just image-dumping.
Come on, loosen up anon. The pic is breathtaking and cool.
Anonymous
No.168073
>>168072
I said it was good, but posting it in this thread implies an argument about flat earth, which wasn't posted until inquired.
Anonymous
No.168074
168163
fluttershy - smug.png
>>168071
>It did indeed come at an elliptical angle.
>Gosh I'm tired.
No doubt. The mental gymnastics to explain the discrepancy must take most of your energy.
Anonymous
No.168075
Floridian Justin Harvey exposing NASA's International Fake Station.mp4
2023-04-04.
>Floridian Justin Harvey exposing NASA's International Fake Station
Anonymous
No.168161
168219 168599
AAchasing-the-stars-compressed.gif
Sirius never moves, it is fixed in the sky.
Anonymous
No.168163
>>168074
Do you have an actual rebuttal?
Anonymous
No.168219
>>168161
>Sirius
Five days have passed and not one single baller caught the mistake.
Pathetic.
Anonymous
No.168221
168222
gravity.jpeg
Gravity, not even the science priests actually know what it is.
Anonymous
No.168222
168224
>>168221
They don't know because it's not exactly easy to understand. It's one of those great mysteries of the cosmos
They could always just make stuff up if they were just bullshitting the whole thing *cough* dark matter *cough* but it's not that simple. There are many different theories for how it works, and questions for what holds things together at the outer reaches of the universe.
Anonymous
No.168224
168225 168226 168228 168230
facehoof.jpg
Esafsa73.jpeg
>>168222
>gravity
>They don't know because it's not exactly easy to understand. It's one of those great mysteries of the cosmos
It is called DENSITY and explains everything darling.
Anonymous
No.168225
168235
>>168224
It's no mystery that gravity is based on density. Even the guy in the meme could've told you that.
Anonymous
No.168226
168236
Only believing what they want to believe.webm
>>168224
>Observable
>Repeatable
>Measureable
It's funny how you think that those alone is how things are "proven".
Anonymous
No.168228
>>168224
Gravity is observable, repeatable and measurable. We know the rate of acceleration of gravity, and can observe it's effects on tides, terrestrial life and interstellar objects.
What we don't know is precisely why and how gravity works, only that it does. I don't see a sophisticated explanation on the metaphysical mechanics of relative density either.
Anonymous
No.168230
168233
>>168224
No idea what relative density even has to do with concave brained earth. It's not like density doesn't exist under Neutonian gravity, or even relativistic gravity.
Anonymous
No.168233
>>168230
And even if it were something separate entirely, it's not like there's any more of a metaphysical explanation for it than gravity has. May as well be the wojak in the other pic on a fool's errand to explain precisely how and why lighter materials float.

Also worth noting that objects weigh the same in vacuum chambers, so relative density can't be the only force at play.
Anonymous
No.168235
168254
3605.png
>>168225
>It's no mystery that gravity is based on density
Careful anon, Density is not the same than mass.
Anonymous
No.168236
168237 168255
>>168226
>Observable
>Repeatable
>Measureable
>It's funny how you think that those alone is how things are "proven".
The 3 items mentioned above are cornerstones of the Scientific Method. Gravity doesn't meet any of those 3 parameters and therefore is just pitiful pseudoscience.
Anonymous
No.168237
168238
>>168236
>Observable
Every observable quality of gravity lines up with predictions made before the model was formed.
>Repeatable
I think the fact we can fly across the breadth of the earth at a stable velocity in what we feel as a straight line showcases that our models for gravity and how best to work around and within it have been repeated pretty thoroughly.
>Measurable
Not one flat earth model to scale can even be produced, let alone without conflicting with itself. Meanwhile we have both Newton's and Einstein's models of gravity which match our experience about as closely as is possible

The reason I'm not even bothering to bust out the math and graphs is because, as has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt through this thread, any physical evidence produced in favor of a round earth or gravity working as we understand it will simply be dismissed as part of the cover-up. If I sit here and argue flight paths you're gonna tell me that pilots simply choose the least effective flightpaths to maintain the illusion of sphericity. That any and all mathematic models related to large celestial bodies are inventions of the masons. This song and dance is tiresome.
Anonymous
No.168238
168239
>>168237
FYI. When this bread reaches 2,000 posts I'll make a fresh one.
Anonymous
No.168239
168240
>>168238
And you spamming faggots call me a bad actor with ill intent.
Anonymous
No.168240
>>168239
B-but you want this thread to keep going forever?
Anonymous
No.168254
>>168235
You're right. I stand corrected.
Anonymous
No.168255
>>168236
How does it not meet those?
Anonymous
No.168397
168411
received_673148344240883.jpg
Can any flat earthers tell me more about what glory lies beyond the great ice wall? What civilizations and explorers might've journeyed past it?
Anonymous
No.168410
168413 168624
01 Aukland to Lima Peru.png
02 Auckland to Mexico City.png
03 Buenos Aires to Delhi India.png
Fresh memes just baked. HiRes.
Flight Route Memes.
Anonymous
No.168411
168429
12f1.png
>>168397
Sagging will give you the attention you wanted and deserve. None.
Anonymous
No.168412
maxresdefault.jpg
>Are Globe Believers Really That Smart? - (3:06 long)
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/are-globe-believers-really-that-smart:3
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WwyOU50Q_8
Anonymous
No.168413
168414
>>168410
>why do commercial flights sometimes take detours or stop in other places
I have one very simple explanation, and it doesn't involve the entire world being topsy turvy: there is not enough financial incentive for a commercial flight which often requires a certain number of seats filled to be profitable to go to your specific destination from your specific departure region. Example, Mexico is a developing country which is decently populated but generally quite poor; Los Angeles is in the country closest to Mexico in a state right against its border. More people in California are either beaners or have the affluence to vacation in a poor place to get their cheap hookers and margaritas.

This is one of the reasons that flights to Christchurch are somewhat sparse depending on where you're departing from; New Zealand isn't that big of a country and Christchurch is not very populous or mainstream of a place (unless you're the PM of NZ touring to apologize to the poor Muslims for evil white people)
Anonymous
No.168414
168415
Flight Route - Johannesburg to Wellington, NZ stops in Doha.png
Flight Route - Montevideo to Perth crosses the Equator two times.png
Flight Route - Sydney to Lima, Peru stops in Los Angeles.png
>>168413
>profitability
I heard that many times and for the unaware to the heliocentric model lie makes totally sense, however taking a closer look, the cost for extra fuel makes no sense and the detours are way, way, way too long.
Anonymous
No.168415
168416
>>168414
You do know that map of yours is a warped, not-to-scale interpretation of a globe earth using the north pole as its center, and the lines spaced out as a means of illustrating the distortion as the southern hemisphere is warped beyond all recognition, right?
Anonymous
No.168416
168417
31858.png
>>168415
>You do know that map of yours is a warped, not-to-scale interpretation of a globe earth using the north pole as its center
It is as it is according to cartography scientifically drawn. See >>149243
Anonymous
No.168417
168418 168419
>>168416
Alexander Gleason patented his work in the US patent numbered 497,917, stating the following:
>"The extorsion of the map from that of a globe consists, mainly in the straightening out of the meridian lines allowing each to retain their original value from Greenwich, the equator to the two poles."
In the queen's English, what he's saying is that he knowingly used a globe shaped map of Earth, shifted perspective to the north pole, and extrapolated with even lines with reference to the meridian in order to come up with simplified time zones. Funny how your purpose is cartography for ease of navigation, instead of the establishment of simplified time zones. Why would he have to adapt his map from the globe model if this were a flat-earth researcher?

As a little side note to showcase why I'm not taking your argument that "it's just so far!" to heart: Greyhound buses have long distance detours all the time. The trip from Fayetteville NC to Columbia MO went as far south as Atlanta GA, both ways. This is because Fayetteville really isn't a super major city aside from the military base within it, and outside of the military which will happily pay their recruits' flight bills to go anywhere within the US, average Joes aren't vacationing to a college city in good ol' Misery where life is expensive and very unattractive for tourism.
Anonymous
No.168418
168420
>>168417
>In the queen's English, what he's saying is that he knowingly used a globe shaped map of Earth, shifted perspective to the north pole, and extrapolated with even lines with reference to the meridian in order to come up with simplified time zones.
I believe your are flipping the meaning. He calls the ball map out.
Anonymous
No.168419
168420
BEFEEEF382D79B27E55F7876B7FCE216-135944.jpg
>>168417
And the map issue is not restricted to that map in particular because the German High Command and the USAF also used that Flat Earth map to conduct the war. See >>157419
Anonymous
No.168420
168421
>>168418
I can forgive you for thinking that he's calling the globe some kind of extortion in the legal sense of the word, but in the context of the sentence he seems quite clear in saying "the difficult obtaining/crafting of this map from the other map" -- otherwise, he would be calling himself an extortionist twisting the arms of globe-earth cartographers to get them to confess to the reeeaaal map, which I highly doubt.
>>168419
I could name a dozen armies who used any vaguely representative maps for their planning, whether highly accurate or not, so long as they had some kind of handle on the topography of the region he is acting upon, which I can easily assume is on his other, more local maps. The map distorts the northern hemisphere the least. Now if Hitler decided he'd fly bombers over Australia or Argentina and he used that map, he'd be bombing water with how off-base he'd be.
Anonymous
No.168421
168422
File (hide): 2064E40DA482C0AADDFE3D14BA6C7CBF-5491858.mp4 (5.2 MB, Resolution:216x480 Length:00:04:02, flat earth - air force map.mp4) [play once] [loop]
flat earth - air force map.mp4
>>168420
>I could name a dozen armies who used any vaguely representative maps for their planning
It is up to you if choose to believe the teachings for nomies or go straight for the maps used by professionals.
Anonymous
No.168422
168423
>>168421
I literally couldn't even see a map in the first clip until the arrow pointed at it. The lines aside from the rings around what seem to be the center point don't even seem to have a pattern to them. The video of the phoneposter waving at a paper map is so low resolution and unfocused that I genuinely can't figure scale or even differentiation of countries' shapes. It looks like a high-fantasy map png you see hung up on an orc's fucking wall at a comically low resolution, or some kind of meme with a fisheye lens with its focal point somewhere that was totally arbitrary. I can't see the mileage markings, I can't see the flight lines themselves even with his finger going over them.

The line about curved/arced flights also showcases that you have never thrown a ball straight up while on a moving object. When something is moving or rotating, and you are going with its motion, you are essentially swimming along with the tide as opposed to upstream, which consumes less fuel and takes less time. Some flat earth proponents say this is just because of wind, but no wind speeds even remotely high enough to make a major difference have ever been recorded even amid hurricanes. And some of these inter-continental flights go in opposite directions simultaneously, are the wind currents localized to the planes, like a state-spanning tornado surrounding each individual plane that flies one way so they both make it to their destination quickly?
Anonymous
No.168423
168424 168431
stubb.png
>>168422
As I said, it is your choice which framework of knowledge you use.
Anonymous
No.168424
168430
>>168423
Let's see, the framework which seems to purport to all the evidence and doesn't require believing the entirety of humanity has been duped into some mostly-inconsequential model of reality which only affects physicists and physicists seem just dandy doing experiments with.......or the one where gravity is actually electromagnetism but magnetic materials and forces are unaffected by its pull toward the Earth, the moon is a hologram or a flat object which everyone at every place in the world sees exactly the same way, eclipses require an anti-moon to explain, and plane travel is conducted entirely by conspirators of the NWO.

Oh yeah, you're right. Flat earth sure is an entertaining model. For science fiction novels.
Anonymous
No.168429
>>168411
Why would you sage if you want attention?
Anonymous
No.168430
>>168424
>and plane travel is conducted entirely by conspirators of the NWO.
The plane model isn't even correct. It's just using "popular travel" routes, which are designed around providing airplanes with the most financially profitable routes, as in where civilization actually exists, as an example of said "conspiracy". This is despite the fact that you can personally charter a direct flight from one of those locations to another for a bit more money, but that's also further "solidifying" the conspiracy angle because you have to pay real money to do it.
Anonymous
No.168431
168582
>>168423
Horsie knows what's right. Listen to horsie.
Anonymous
No.168460
168572
maxresdefault.jpg
>How a Pilot Ended the Globe - (7:54 long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/how-a-pilot-ended-the-globe:4
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFz4ZZd1zj4
Another nail on the globe coffin and this one is really big.
-----

Original night flight video: https://www.beyondclouds.ch/2017/04/05/vuelo-nocturno-the-magic-of-flying-at-night/
Anonymous
No.168461
maxresdefault.jpg
Scr5327.png
>Jesuits Erasing our Flat Earth - Documentary - (25:38 long)
>How the biggest deception started and who promoted it, narrated by Johnny Cirucci. From the Holy Roman Empire, to modern times, while explaining the Jesuit connection with Pythagoras, Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, Einstein, etc.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u2N9xKJZA5zP/
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olbyJDou4qQ
It is a solid, informative documentary.
Anonymous
No.168572
168573
maxresdefault.jpg
>>168460
>How a Pilot Ended the Globe
Here's the 3rd part watching the stars moving in a totally different fashion than expected by the ballers.

>4,656 Miles and Zero Curvature - Part 3 (How a Pilot Ended the Globe) - (2:36 long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/4,656-miles-and-zero-curvature-part-3:2
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RagVOOW-sa8
Anonymous
No.168573
168574
>>168572
>more "wer do i go down doe" arguments
Allow me to put this in terms that even you might understand. Imagine, if you will, that there is a rubber band of a very specific distance connecting you and a plane to the very center of a ball earth. Elevation from the center would be exactly the same on a round trip no matter where you go. The "band" pulls in a manner that you could pull it further by tilting up, loosen it by tilting down, or stay at the same length with a moderate amount of downward force which is resisted by your craft on account of being aerodynamic.

You don't need to actively try to point down because the angle changing is imperceptibly small and elevation is not changing relative to the center of the earth on a cruise route.
Anonymous
No.168574
168575
>>168573
>The "band" pulls in a manner that you could pull it further by tilting up, loosen it by tilting down, or stay at the same length with a moderate amount of downward force which is resisted by your craft on account of being aerodynamic.
That's a fine explanation if you want to stick to the delusion; however the stars don't lie, if this realm would be a ball, stars would move upwards and they don't.
Anonymous
No.168575
168576
>>168574
>the stars don't lie
You mean the stars that look different from places on different areas instead of looking the same across the flat earth? The stars that proponents of flat earth have to come up with shit like "personalized stars" to explain?
Anonymous
No.168576
168577 168579
sextant.jpg
k2552.jpg
576x768bb.jpg
the-constellation-sextans-star-in-the-night-sky-free-vector.jpg
>>168575
>the stars that look different from places on different areas
>personalized stars
Well, I don't want to gloat but you might need a bit of training on using the starts to navigate.
Anonymous
No.168577
168579 168580 168582 168585
>>168576
From the north hemisphere, the "starts" rotate in one direction, and from the south hemisphere, the "starts" rotate the other way. How is this? Imagine how that would look from a flat earth model. Imagine someone looking south from the south ends of South America, Africa, or Australia. On a round earth, aside from potential timezone differences, these people can all look south and see the Southern Cross. On a flat earth, these people are literally on opposite ends of the realm. How the fuck is that explicable with a flat earth?
Anonymous
No.168579
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168576
>>168577
Actually, to add to that, what the fuck is """south""" on a flat earth? These people would be looking in entirely different directions on the flat earth map, looking directly to the closest direction of the outer ring of Antarctica.

>>168578
What???
Anonymous
No.168580
168581 168583 168585
>>168577
The planed crossed the Ecuator tropic. Did you notice that happening?
Anonymous
No.168581
168583
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168580
Why did you delete your post if you're not even going to spellcheck what you said? How does this make it so these three countries' southernmost points are literally looking in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS?
Anonymous
No.168582
>>168577
>>168431
Anonymous
No.168583
168584
>>168581
Back to the topic. See >>168580
Anonymous
No.168584
168586
>>168583
???????????
Firstly you literally changed the topic of the stars and then told me to get "back to the topic." Secondly, how the fuck does the planet cross a tropic? Tropic literally means a region of the planet.
Anonymous
No.168585
>>168580
Back to topic see >>168577 >>168579
Anonymous
No.168586
168587
img-2763220-1-rainbow_dash_lip_bite_by_daviez20-d4x5vf4.gif
>>168584
>how the fuck does the planet cross a tropic?
This is elementary school geography class. In my region I learnt about tropics perhaps when I was 10. I assume you are the product of the Rockefeller curriculum, so, it is not your fault.
Seriously, would you like to talk about Hollywood movies instead?
Anonymous
No.168587
168588
>>168586
>Tropic literally means a region of the planet.
Anonymous
No.168588
168589 168590
world-map-with-equator-and-tropics.jpg
>>168587
Rockefeller curriculum indeed. The jews did a very good job retarding the population.
Anonymous
No.168589
168591
>>168588
This doesn't clear anything up.
Anonymous
No.168590
>>168588
And U are the biggest example.
Anonymous
No.168591
168592
>>168589
It was you who said the stars rotate in opposite directions in every hemisphere, then, if you know the very basics of geography...
I'm not saying that's incorrect, I'm saying where in the video happened? And because you have no clue and speaks only because of the movies and what the school taught you, you are more than confused.
Stick to Flat Earth fren, even if you insist you live on a ball, you will learn A LOT about STEM subjects and many other useful themes.
Anonymous
No.168592
168593
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168591
>I'm not saying that's incorrect, I'm saying where in the video happened?
Motherfucker, go to the southern hemisphere. Set up a telescope and watch the change over the night. Fucking drive to South America through Mexico. It's not some super obscure thing that nobody is allowed to see because the EU will stop you by any means necessary.

And since you've completely ignored this point because you think naming tropics invalidates it: how do these three locations see the same Southern Cross?
Anonymous
No.168593
168594
13905.png
>>168592
>Motherfucker, go to the southern hemisphere.
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.168594
168595
>>168593
>this time I'm not disagreeing because that would make me sound like a massive retard
>but also hurr hurr hollywooded
Anonymous
No.168595
168596
>>168594
Be sport anon. You stepped on a field that is not your league.
The best and advisable thing to do is to retreat and read some books.
Anonymous
No.168596
168597
not gonna let up on this one.jpg
>>168595
Shut the fuck up. How do Australians, Africans and South Americans see this?
Anonymous
No.168597
168598
>>168596
I think you should explain it (I suspect you can't).
Is it one of those personalized stars you were talking about? /s
Anonymous
No.168598
168599
like this shitheel.jpg
>>168597
Because all three continents are on the southern hemisphere, and looking south would mean looking in the same direction.
All maps that flat earthers have made contradict this. They have these people all looking in three radically different directions and seeing the same star. What's YOUR explanation?
Anonymous
No.168599
168600 168601
>>168598
>They have these people all looking in three radically different directions and seeing the same star.
But not in the same sky position at the same time because the stars are rotating on the firmament. See >>168161
Anonymous
No.168600
168602
>>168599
So according to you south is different at different times of day. Compasses have no function at all. Okay.
How about the planet and daylight obstruct visibility? Is that really hard to believe?
Anonymous
No.168601
>>168599
And actually, two of those countries CAN see the same star at the same time. Just have to have one at early night and one at late night/early morning to sync it up. But completely possible.
Anonymous
No.168602
168603 168604
>>168600
>So according to you south is different at different times of day.
Not the South only. I am talking about different locations (or geographical longitud), each fag standing at different longitudes will see at the same time X star at different positions.
Anonymous
No.168603
this is your mindset.png
>>168602
Aside from the rotation which we all see happening, everything is quite static out there, on behalf of how far away they are.
And regardless, the model you touted and continue to tout shows THIS. So this is law now.
Anonymous
No.168604
168605 168606
untitled-design-18.jpg
>>168602
>geographical longitud)
I am sorry, I forgot your Rockefeller curriculum.
Anonymous
No.168605
168606
fuck you.png
>>168604
Fuck off nigger.
Anonymous
No.168606
168607
>>168605
If you see the >>168604 pic, you may notice that a faggot on the North Pole on a ball will be in the same situation than your pic of a flat surface.
Just saying.
Anonymous
No.168607
168608 168610
>>168606
What, he's gonna look through the ground he's standing on to see the Southern Cross?
Anonymous
No.168608
168609
>>168607
>Rockefeller curriculum again
Look again both pics, imagine yourself with a compass on the north pole and pointing at different locations named south. See the similarity?
Anonymous
No.168609
>>168608
You mean the magnet fails to work because you're literally on the opposite pole? If you pick a direction and go straight, eventually it'll end up going to the south pole. How does someone on the north pole on a flat earth not see the Southern Cross if it's flat?
Anonymous
No.168610
168611 168616
>>168607
At this point I am wondering. Are you even White?
Anonymous
No.168611
168613
>>168610
At this point, I'm wondering. Are you even White?
Anonymous
No.168613
168614
>>168611
Just to inform you. At school always was forbidden to use an electronic calculator until the Calculus level was reached. Yes, it was stressed to use the brain on long manual calculations, very prone to error, over the convenience of machines.
That was not a Rockefeller curriculum at all.
Anonymous
No.168614
168615
>>168613
Maybe they don't like third graders using an electronic calculator for their times tables because they're teaching them to actually do arithmetic.
Anonymous
No.168615
168617
The+Matrix+Equation +AX=B.jpg
calculus-integrals.jpg
maxresdefault.jpg
>>168614
>third graders
Yeah, right.
Anonymous
No.168616
168618
since you are soliciting muh doxxx here you go nigger.jpg
>>168610
Anonymous
No.168617
hmmmmmm.jpg
>>168615
What precisely is the point of talking about calculator usage? Just another ginormous-faggot topic switch?
Anonymous
No.168618
168619
Picture 2023-08-10 02-35-36.png
>>168616
My skin is my uniform.
Anonymous
No.168619
168620
this is you boom boom.png
>>168618
>that skin
>that arm hair
Whaddya know, he is a boomer! Thanks for taking the bait I guess. You're still a massive faggot though.
Anonymous
No.168620
1502993.gif
>>168619
>hair
This is not happening.
Anonymous
No.168622
168623
Flateq.jfif
>tfw Equestria is based and flatpilled

is Lauren Faust /our/ flat earth girl?
Anonymous
No.168623
twilight - yes.png
>>168622
Of course.
Anonymous
No.168624
flight route - johannesburg to wellington, nz stops in doha.png
flight route - montevideo to perth crosses the equator two times.png
flight route - sydney to lima, peru stops in los angeles.png
flight route - sydney to mexico city stops in los angeles.png
>>168410
Moar HiRes Flight Route memes.
Anonymous
No.168668
image0-1.gif
perspective_mirage_horizon_optics.jpg
FB_IMG_1680818573367.png
IMG_1874.png
IMG_0852.jpg
Flat Earth is one of the most political topics out there yet it needs to be contained in the paranormal section
Anonymous
No.168669
168671
moon_isnt_spherical.jpeg
1692077273657797m.jpg
6b270d5fd4b621cdd955d09a25f891e2.jpg
307925042_3115017798809407_8105606373321312621_n.jpg
1690743954863822m.jpg

Anonymous
No.168671
168672 168675
>>168669
Can I have the source for pic 1? That doesn't look like the moon to me.
Also, what's up with pic 4? You can see everything Galileo did with a modern telescope. The only difference between now and then is light pollution, which is solved by going somewhere secluded.
Anonymous
No.168672
168673 168674
not again.jpg
>>168671
I'm not the poster but, this cannot be happening at /mlpol/.
F
Anonymous
No.168673
168685
>>168672
Well, to me it looks like a photo of the sun. The moon has visible craters.
Anonymous
No.168674
168677
PJFq.gif
>>168672
>this cannot be happening at /mlpol/
Oh noooo, don't ever ask for the sauce for pics. That never happens on chandites.
Anonymous
No.168675
168676
>>168671
>You can see everything Galileo did with a modern telescope
Again, I'm not the posters, but if you go to jewtube and search for moon+nikon you might conclude that Galileo was a nigger.
Anonymous
No.168676
168678
>>168675
What did Galileo see that I can't now?
Anonymous
No.168677
168681
>>168674
B-but, what difference does it make?
Anonymous
No.168678
168680
>>168676
Check yourself out at jewtube anon. Spoonfeeding is not in the menu today.
Anonymous
No.168680
168682
>>168678
>Spoon-feeding
>implying
I asked to to elaborate on what you said. If you can't even do that, how am I supposed to take you seriously?
Anonymous
No.168681
>>168677
None.
Anonymous
No.168682
168684
>>168680
It's your opinion.
Anonymous
No.168684
168686
94672303805e953ccd2464d994cd5af5.png
>>168682
Enjoy your discussionless meme-dump then.
Anonymous
No.168685
File (hide): F2D77061C613247E4D4F358C3687A8F8-3481057.mov (3.3 MB, Resolution:576x950 Length:00:00:26, 69052262372 (1).mov) [play once] [loop]
69052262372 (1).mov
>>168673
craters or lumps?
Anonymous
No.168686
168688
>>168684
Fellow Equestrian, I just came home, I'm dirty and hungry, I have 4 messages and 3 emails plus a ton to check online before even to engage you again. Please by patient. Thank you.
Anonymous
No.168688
>>168686
Nigger, people are just responding to things you say. Respond in time or wait to respond, stop announcing every time you take a nap.
Anonymous
No.168721
168722
61642c952a9f57c3.png

Anonymous
No.168722
168730 168731
>>168721
Those are vapor trails. They dissipate and distort immediately, and they're nowhere near long enough to show visible curves relative to the earth.
Not only that, this photo is taken at a worms-eye angle where vertical curvature wouldn't be visible even if they were long enough.
This is so retarded, it must be a joke. I think you just reposted satire.
Anonymous
No.168730
contrail vs chemtrail.jpeg
>>168722
>Those are vapor trails.
Mmmmm, it doesn't look like.
Anonymous
No.168731
168732
Y6yi3qW.jpeg
b1f11aa40b24d0c163d7622cd6e0abb90ec9441a6e816a0d323ea1c58e28bca4_1.jpg
cdn.minds.jpeg
chemtrails.jpg
>>168722
>This photo is taken at a worms-eye angle where vertical curvature wouldn't be visible even if they were long enough
A better angle to show that there is not any curvature perhaps?
Anonymous
No.168732
>>168731
Well, first of all, they are visibly curved in those pics, just not curved in any particular direction: these lines are hardly ever straight in the first place, so you wouldn't notice the curve even if they were there.
Second of all, they're not long enough to see visible curvature for the same exact reason why you can't see the cube of the horizon.
Anonymous
No.168967
168971
dvdled.jpeg
49f52d64960b23f9d9b806897d1e233e.png
>NASA shows sportsmanship by congratulating India on beating the US to the moon's South Pole - BUT Russia and China stay silent after the Chandrayaan-3 craft makes history
>India has landed on the moon's South Pole - an unmapped region of the surface
>The nation now joins Russia, China and the US in landing on the moon
>Chandrayaan-3 will determine if water ice is hiding in the South Pole region
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12436887/Indias-Chandrayaan-3-makes-history-landing-moons-South-Pole-time-beating-Russia-China-USA.html
Yeah, right.
The NASA moon mission v2.0, shitskin version is soooooooo credible. Nevertheless that space does not exist, but the normie has to be fed more illusions.
Anonymous
No.168971
169048
>>168967
Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week. It was probably rushed out because they wanted to do it before the Pajeets (not to mention budget cuts in favor of the Ukraine war), and now they're embarrassed at letting street-shitters beat them in rocket science because.
China isn't saying anything because they don't want to acknowledge that the Pajeets might rival them in technology, since they've been wanting to land there as well. Their relationship with India is also fairly adversarial, despite trying to cooperate with BRICS.
Unless you're implying that Russia and China are only staying silent because they don't want to corroborate the concept that space is real? It's a bit late for that, as they both have their own space programs. They're
>The NASA moon mission v2.0
Which mission? There were several.
Also you're giving NASA too much credit. NASA hasn't been able to land any probes on the moon's south pole. They lost to Pajeets. It's kind of a big deal in the world of space expeditios, because the moon's south pole's potential for water and minerals may make it a site of interest for future operations.

Of course, I don't expect you to believe anything about what I just said. I'm just commenting on the news for anyone else who has to see it the next time this thread gets bumped.
Anonymous
No.169047
169051 169054 169057 169086
maxresdefault.jpg
wsx.jpg
>Chandrayaan-3 - More of India's CGI Moon Landing
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/chandrayaan-3-more-of-india's-cgi-moon:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPJQp3tTGI
These masons are getting more absurd by the day.
Anonymous
No.169048
169053
>>168971
>Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week.
And you believe them. /s
C'mon we are well beyond the "just trust us" point.
>China isn't saying anything
Anon, all space agencies are ran by the same hoaxers.
Anonymous
No.169049
169052
U452d.jpeg
I know the shitskins are a joke, but if they for real released this CGI then there is not hope for them.
https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1695415299774849291
Anonymous
No.169051
169201
File (hide): 1508D0D1AFF8057DED235F7D23A73691-494488.mp4 (482.9 KB, Resolution:360x480 Length:00:00:16, The India Moon Landing .mp4) [play once] [loop]
The India Moon Landing .mp4
>>169047
I'm telling you right now. That CGI is not real.
Anonymous
No.169052
>>169049
Where is this video from? I can't find it anywhere.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tXbH6E8vDsg
All the pics I of earth I'm finding from the mission look something like the link above.
Anonymous
No.169053
169056
>>169048
Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
>And you believe them.
What is there to believe if they didn't say anything?
Anonymous
No.169054
169055
>>169047
Where are these videos from?
Anonymous
No.169055
169059
Untitled.jpeg
>>169054
You have to go to the source of mass propaganda dissemination.
Anonymous
No.169056
169058 169060
>>169053
>Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
Cos that's the point of this hoax and narrative. The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west. Both Russia and China are main branches of the NWO, and they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight.
It is all smoke and mirrors to shape further the mind of the masses.
Anonymous
No.169057
>>169047
Yeah, that's a very good question. Who was already on the moon to film the landing.
Anonymous
No.169058
169062
>>169056
>they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight
If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
Anonymous
No.169059
169061
>>169055
I've been to YouTube. I'm asking where that footage in particular comes from. Idk if it's even part of the same project.
Anonymous
No.169060
>>169056
>The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west.
Russia and China are not the west.
Anonymous
No.169061
169063
>>169059
Dig anon, dig. Surely you'll find out.
Anonymous
No.169062
>>169058
>If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
A public concession it looks to me.
Anonymous
No.169063
169064
>>169061
My digging led me to the conclusion that this is a completely unrelated video. If you have evidence to the contrary, do share.
Anonymous
No.169064
>>169063
Don't give up anon, I know you can do it.
Anonymous
No.169086
File (hide): 4AF9CA62F25C8F699D93D2837DBB73BD-1065505.mp4 (1.0 MB, Resolution:460x480 Length:00:00:20, Its like 1969 again.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Its like 1969 again.mp4
>>169047
>Chandrayaan-3 - More of India's CGI Moon Landing
Anonymous
No.169199
Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.mp4
Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.
Anonymous
No.169200
an object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.mp4
An object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.
Weird.
Anonymous
No.169201
File (hide): D5051F89369C72ABDA6022CFF310FA21-2266818.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:41, indias hoax.mp4) [play once] [loop]
indias hoax.mp4
>>169051
Anonymous
No.169411
169412
11365a0cb7366cf9.jpg

sage
sage
No.169412
169413 169414
>>169411
>look at me! I don't know what exposure is!!!
Anonymous
No.169413
>>169412
Both can be done easily with ISO400 in case you are wondering. This is coming from somefag that entered into a dark room before.
Anonymous
No.169414
169415
>>169412
Ah, also there is no way such amount of light to be reflected by a dark dusty rock.
Anonymous
No.169415
169416
>>169414
>white dust
>not reflective
Anonymous
No.169416
169417
Screenshot_20230925_122004.png
>>169415
Anonymous
No.169417
169418
twilight_sparkle_not_amused_vector_by_homersimpson1983_dfevo21-fullview.png
>>169416
Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes? You think that proves anything that hasn't already been said?
Anonymous
No.169418
169420 169422
523E60B4D6BB18DA6857015F183E340D-205764.png
>>169417
>Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes?
Actually is kinda charity I'm doing with you. By helping you to see what you refuse to see, I'm doing doing the Lord's will. Even if I only get scorn in return.
Anonymous
No.169420
169421
>>169418
I can already see it quite well. I just disagree with your implication.
You can see this stuff on earth. If you look down at a salt flats from the top of the hill, the white plane looks so bright it's blinding to look on that direction, but if you're standing in the middle of the flats it looks normal and unremarkable.
Anonymous
No.169421
169423
>>169420
Globers....
Anonymous
No.169422
>>169418
>God made me do all what I do
Please stop slandering God's good name.
Anonymous
No.169423
>>169421
Nigger...
Anonymous
No.169459
File (hide): FF086548756079B703D8075A599CF319-4199004.mp4 (4.0 MB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:00:47, the_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
the_EDIT.mp4

Anonymous
No.169460
169463 172832
File (hide): 9E736FAD48AC4736A66F070F2D0D97B6-1297383.webm (1.2 MB, Resolution:1080x1080 Length:00:00:10, 1696341091543783.webm) [play once] [loop]
1696341091543783.webm

Anonymous
No.169463
169464
e9958a6.png
>>169460
And what about all the rest? Hah? Those planes are off by thousands of miles.
Anonymous
No.169464
169466
>>169463
How does this explain the above video?
Anonymous
No.169465
File (hide): 139208B43C40FC951EC61284411F41FC-1457321.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:08, 1696340365873372.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1696340365873372.mp4

Anonymous
No.169466
169468
>>169464
It doesn't because you picked the most extreme case to explain tons of geographical anomalies that doesn't add up.
And your video doesn't debunk anything by the way, it only shows that that particular route can take another path.
Anonymous
No.169468
169469
>>169466
>it only shows that that particular route can take another path
Then why would they all have similar durations?
Anonymous
No.169469
169470
Screenshot_20231003_222056.png
>>169467
>Regardless, the flight path is only feasible on a round planet.
Wrong. That particular path is feasible in both realms, this is why the faggot doing the video picked that route.
>>169468
>Then why would they all have similar durations?
Take a look to your own video, the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Anonymous
No.169470
169472
>>169469
>the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Take a long look at it and see how the paths vary greatly in distance on the flat model.
Anonymous
No.169472
169473
large.png
>>169470
>Take a long look
Better yet, let us measure it.
Anonymous
No.169473
169474
>>169472
It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model, and yet the flight path is similar in duration to all the others.
Anonymous
No.169474
169476 169481
>>169473
>It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model,
I presuming you are referring to the arc over the Pacific ocean, then you may ask to the faggot who draw the arc on the map instead of straight line over or alongside the Americas.
Anonymous
No.169476
169477
>>169474
The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl. It passes over Sydney, Aukland, and Santiago, and arrives in it's destination at a similar time to all the other paths.
This picture demonstrates that you can leave Jakarta in any direction and still get to Bogota in an similar amount of time because all the paths are the same distance.
This isn't possible on flat earth: Flights with paths closer to the south pole (or "ice wall") would be drastically longer, as shown in the map.
Anonymous
No.169477
169478 169479 169481 172851
02FD8F02016CCD803797D2F65FA8EC70-637293.png
>>169476
>The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl
And how you know that is IRL? Pilots themselves have discovered that instruments lie to them, more on this soon...