/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2570 replies and 1349 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.163369
163370
>>163368
>music and psycholog
You don't qualify to evaluate even physics 101. That said, read a book nigger.
Anonymous
No.163370
163372
>>163369
Oh, thays just college. That is what you said, college.
I got my engineering creds - which people actually pay me money for, enough to have employees, no less - from a trade school. But, accredation is an appeal to authority argument, and has no bearing on the discussion.
And speaking of no bearing on the discussion, in an ironic parallel to ITT, here's the latest Flat Earth Fridays!
Credit, I was oblivious to Sci Man Dan until this thread showed up
https://youtu.be/2huZYKlAdVQ
Anonymous
No.163372
>>163370
>Sci Dan
That paid shill together with all NASA spoke persons won't debate Eric Dubay. There has to be a reason for them not to take that golden opportunity to shame and discredit the Flat Earth poster boy.
Interestingly, the same scenario applies to holohoax propagandists who always decline to debate holohoax debunkers.
Anonymous
No.163376
163377 163379
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDy95_eNPzM
Flatty's cannot dispute this.
Anonymous
No.163377
>>163376
>Flatty's cannot dispute this.
Interesting details. And yet heliocentrism is not holding water, the announced curve cannot be found, then the globe is a fantasy.
Anonymous
No.163379
163383
>>163376
As usual, surely Globebuster made an answer video to the glober. Videos of answer and counter-answers (polemic) populate jew-tube. By posting that Sci-fi Dan video, you are posting a partial view on the subject.
Take in count that OP refrains from posting this kind of crap and sticks to the facts.
Anonymous
No.163383
164877
136925FE922672BB94D224D49018916D-4095225.jpg
>>163379
>sci fi dan
Ngl, thats hilarious, cuz its not wrong. Still, this is the flat earth thread so this is where such content applies, whether in support or in contest of flat earth ahem theory. Gives an idea, actually; youll see.
>based nasaponr
Anonymous
No.163405
164571 165790
https://youtu.be/zixc8eojZdg
Heres a 25 minute video showing the very slow process of a distant supertanker deacending over the horizon.
Pay specific attention to how OP reacts to yet more incontravertable visual evidence of curvature
Recommended at 2x speed
Anonymous
No.163482
163525 164825
Flight_Map_High_Res.jpg
>>163017
Because the sensors are square. But the lens does add barrel distortion, it's just slight enough in most cases that you don't notice it. In 3D renders people add in fake distortion to make it look more realistic

Actual photo of a straight building
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SpyTP7rdwv6N-cA9VToYfBIS8yj6lg5Py2XfOeo488Q/edit#slide=id.g141444f9b3_1_251

>>163365
The reasoning for this could be as simple as the winds being strong or them not wanting to risk having a problem while being in the middle of nowhere to land. But I'm guessing there's also some economy to it, since flights aren't always simple A to B but can have people going to multiple different destinations and if you go a path that's close to many others you can make dropoffs for all of those places, and load on new passengers, places probably more worthwhile than Africa

How do you explain flight paths being curved most of the time? Including, yes, when they do actually go from Africa to South America or Australia
Anonymous
No.163507
163508 163509
If you flattys get some flat earth bitch to suck my cock I might start shilling for it.
Anonymous
No.163508
163510
>>163507
Die in fire
>t. globey
Anonymous
No.163509
163510
deal with it.jpg
>>163507
And yet, this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.163510
163511
>>163508
Rude
>>163509
It could be for a price, until then it's round.
Anonymous
No.163511
163512
>>163510
>until then it's round.
Prove it!
Anonymous
No.163512
163513
>>163511
The Burden of Proof is on (you) by the way don't just say "Hurr Look at da thread"
People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.
Anonymous
No.163513
163514 163524
>>163512
>People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.
Not true.
What you call "people" were a bunch of freemason satanists spouting kabbala teachings. Heliocentrism is opposed to the our natural senses and is debunked by experimentation.
Real "people" from before and after the middle ages knew Earth is flat.
Anonymous
No.163514
163515
>>163513
Why would freemasons waste so many resources from the middle ages up until the present trying to convince everyone that the planet we are on is flat?
Anonymous
No.163515
163516
>>163514
>b-but why?
See >>149734
Anonymous
No.163516
163517
>>163515
>meme arrow instead of just telling me
>linking to a 30 minute video without timestamps
C'mon you gotta do better than that if you want to convince me.
Anonymous
No.163517
163518
File (hide): 8DD6B3D364D3B6E0EBB4F13E9F350B5A-3541715.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:57, Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms_EDIT.mp4
>>163516
>B-but.. why?
>linking to a 30 minute video without timestamps
I knew it. You won't do any research whatsoever.
Anonymous
No.163518
163520
>>163517
>More meme arrows instead of just telling me why the masons would waste their most precious recourses on perpetuating a scam on a global magnitude
You know. if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answer
Anonymous
No.163520
163522 163524
>>163518
>if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answer
Sadly I can't give you a pol/ack answer, it is forbidden by rule #7.
Anonymous
No.163522
163523
F9A2E302C8331EFDE95815424AB09CB3-533480.png
>>163520
>*Snap*
Yep, you're a retard.
Anonymous
No.163523
163524
>>163522
Hardly when it is you who won't research and choose to parrot heliocentric falsehoods.
Anonymous
No.163524
>>163513
>mideval freemasons
Please, PLEASE attempt to validate this point, I beg (you).
>>163520
>I cant cuz da roolz
Uhm,... what?
>>163523
No no, you opened this can of worms.
How do site rules prohibit you from simply answering the question?
>inb4 the site is staffed by masons
Anonymous
No.163525
163704
let_s_party__by_quizia_d93v0du.png
I wish IDs were turned on so I could call out the faggot(s) that ignore my points whenever I post them in reply to some dumb meme they post. >>163482 >>163311 >>162824 >>162790 still waiting

The threads all dumb memes and bickering about "AD HOMINIM" or "BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU" because the flat earth fags can't do anything else
Anonymous
No.163538
163690
Its friday!
https://youtu.be/Zd18XUO2StM
Anonymous
No.163685
163690
Today's Flat Eart Friday was boring, just some loon reeeeing about how video of the International Space station can't be real cuz this one guy's collar moves at this point, and how its probably a green screen in spite of them passing a floating microphone around.
So instead, here's a vid where Sci Dan and Prof. Dave go over the main proofs from Dave's debate with "DITRH", for those who dont comprehend the citations.
https://youtu.be/26UkTow1RRo
Original post
>>163010
Anonymous
No.163690
163697 163701
hqdefault.jpg
>>163538
>>163685
>Sci-Fi Dan
And yet, how come the curvature can't be found?

>33.63 miles No curvature..Again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6kOOvNLuGY
Anonymous
No.163697
163699 163703
>>163690
I trust you're going to pretend all the proofs posted in your absence dont exist?
Anonymous
No.163699
>>163697
>all the proofs posted
Seriously?
Any pseudo proof is rendered null if not a curve is found.
Anonymous
No.163700
>>158063
Try to comprehend it this time
Anonymous
No.163701
163704
>>163690
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.163703
>>163697
Sorry fren but there is point where you have to face the Plane.
Anonymous
No.163704
163781
>>163701
How come its only in obscure locations and by dodgy indivoduals that results like this manifest? How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature? Like the 15deg tilt gauge incident?
Ahem
>>163525
Anonymous
No.163781
163783
>>163704
>How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature?
Simple, if the faggots doing the measurements and equipment are paid by the occupiers in power, the results will always be the same lies.
Independent research discovers what the globe religion won't tell.
Anonymous
No.163782
File (hide): FA7ECB719BF6594643DE91C980C59CA8-1516181.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:59, FLAT EARTH IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNIA.mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNIA.mp4
Dome.
Anonymous
No.163783
163785
>>163781
I get it now. Flat Earth is conceptually a hierarchy structured around scientific invompetence (umbrella term representing the various fields that unanimously, cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earth), where the greater one's assertiveness and incompetence, the further 'up' the hierarchy.
Anonymous
No.163785
163786
World_location_map_(equirectangular_180).svg.png
>>163783
>cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earth
Most of those results are not valid at all as the (((occupiers))) won't allow travel beyond the 60th Parallel and claim a monopoly on ship's traffic rights.
Anonymous
No.163786
163790
>>163785
speaking of Antarctica and/or "the Antarctic Ice Wall" lol
IF the flat earth pizza were a thing
THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.
Anonymous
No.163787
Oekaki.png
In a globe, the upper hemisphere is equidistant to the lower hemisphere.
In a flat earth, the upper hemisphere is a fraction of the distance around the same latitudinal position
Anonymous
No.163788
163790
Oekaki.png
>flat earth
The circumference of the line closer to the north pole is much less than the like that goes near the ice wall, represented by the border. And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
Anonymous
No.163790
163795
>>163786
>THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.
That's correct.
Search for captain Cook in this thread, he sailed like 70,000 miles trying to go around Antarctica, but he couldn't cos' Earth is a plane.

>>163788
And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
Everyday.
Search for flying routes in this thread.
Anonymous
No.163795
163796 163826 163831
>>163790
>Navigation
Planes are based on profit motive, of getting as many people from everywhere to everywhere else. Its not like when you buy a plane ticket they fly ONLY YOU nonstop to wherever, unless you charter a plane for ~1.5 million. The failure to grasp how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans is one of your most laugable bits of incompetence.
>Cook
Yes, your idiocy on that has already been addressed. Heres the reminder!
>>149629

>Cook
>149629
Anonymous
No.163796
163811
>>163795
>how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans
Are you implying that all air traffic control and navigators have successfully been bribed into concealing the shape of the earth?
Anonymous
No.163811
163833
US Navy Missile Instructor Proof of Service - Flat Earth - Mark Sargent.webm
>>163796
>denial plus sticking to the brainwashing programming
Let us check what some technical guy has to say out:

>US Navy Missile Instructor Proof of Service - Flat Earth - Mark Sargent
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Z5jWs-xZiaE
Mark Sargent is a Flat Earth researcher and cat is out of the bag.
Anonymous
No.163812
163813
flat earth models.jpeg
121MegamodelDec2021007.jpeg
26_014_900x.jpeg
100April2021046_900x.jpeg
100April2021085_900x.jpeg
Allow me to shill some Firmament models.
Not mine but they are cool nevertheless
https://flatearthmodels.com/
Anonymous
No.163813
orrery.png
>>163812
Orreries are cooler.
Anonymous
No.163815
Screenshot_20220602-225621_DuckDuckGo.jpg
According to flat earth, the distance between blue x and y, and red x and y is:
A. the same
B. blue is greater distance than red
C. red is greater than blue
D. omfg, masonic nasa shill
Anonymous
No.163816
163823
fe 1.png
fe 2.png
fe 3.png
fe 4.png
fe 5.png

Anonymous
No.163822
Its friday again! Today's FEF starts off with Bob proving the planet's rotation!
https://youtu.be/CXylB6HPHRk
Anonymous
No.163823
>>163816
These are the worst and most retarded memes I have ever seen.
Anonymous
No.163824
163902
>>148613
Maybe Flat Earth is a CIA PsyOp to make legitimate conspiracies look silly by comparison.

Radio towers are tall because short ones aren't as good. Shoet ones aren't as good because the earth is round.

Catapult and Trebuchet users centuries ago accounted for the curvature of the earth when calculating and aiming because the earth is round.

We have seen space.

We have landed shit on asteroids.

We have launched sattelites into space and used them, so we know they are there.

The planet is a round speck in a vast ocean of astral bullshit. Sorry, but we are not a flat plane rotating on the back of four elephants on the back of a turtle.
Anonymous
No.163825
163827
>>158065
>>159492
>If you believe Earth is round because a local optical effect on perspective, then you have a loooooooong way before to come to your senses.
Could you elaborate a little on this? I'm genuinely curious. I see that after your response to the photos in question nobody else bothered to reply to your reply instead opted to pretend as if you didn't answer. I'm neither pro nor against flat earth. The scientific community is indeed a bunch of liars and I gain nothing from being loyal to them, however, just believing in a flat earth to spite them isn't something I'm gonna do.

So, I'm genuinely curious here. When you talk about the optical effect on perspective I assume that you're talking about how things get smaller the further away they are from you. But some of these ships' hulls seem to be out of view. Either the ships are way too submerged or we don't see the hull because there's water in the way. This could be explained by the idea that there's curvature and that there becomes a hill of water that cut off the line of sight. At the same time, if this was true you'd expect the ships' poles and cargo to be slightly angled away from you.
All of this is taken by a camera. I have seen the video that's somewhere in this thread about a nikon camera that zoomed in so far that it got a view of the islands and cities despite the fact that the formula for the curvature so has obstructed them. Don't remember if those cities were submerged though.

What are your thoughts?
Anonymous
No.163826
163827
409.png
426.png
>>163795
>Planes are based on profit motive, of getting as many people from everywhere to everywhere else. Its not like when you buy a plane ticket they fly ONLY YOU nonstop to wherever, unless you charter a plane for ~1.5 million. The failure to grasp how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans is one of your most laugable bits of incompetence.
Yeah, right.
Anonymous
No.163827
>>163826
>my disbelief is an argument
Meanwhile, notice how the flat earth model involves exponentially more area between continents, the closer one gets to the perimeter. What this means is, flat earthers have to explain why the planet doesnt reflect this in geography.
>>163825
Or just answer this guy's question
Anonymous
No.163828
163830
Ill reiterate, simplified.

If thr flat earth map has any legitimacy, you would be ablr to measure an increase in the amount of area between longitudinal degrees, the further one gets from the north pole.
Anonymous
No.163829
Ill also point out how it makes MORE sense for a plane to fly halfway across the world when going to the next continent over, to a flat earther
Anonymous
No.163830
>>163828
>If thr flat earth map has any legitimacy
It looks legit enough to me >>149243
Anonymous
No.163831
163832
>>163795
>Planes are based on profit motive
Absolutely, and yet their fly paths across the oceans make not sense at all, at least... our realm is a plane. >>163365
Anonymous
No.163832
>>163831
>they dont make sense
Only if you're a mong. It makes sense to anyone who has ever had to work out product sourcing and distribution
Anonymous
No.163833
163835
>>163811
You didn't answer my question.
Anonymous
No.163835
163836
>>163833
Dude, your "science" doesn't add up. There is not any curve and sticking to the lies makes you look a shill or the dumbest on this plane. See >>149168
Anonymous
No.163836
163837
>>163835
>implying if you ask questions you're a shill
I didn't cite any "science", faggot. I just asked a basic question.
Anonymous
No.163837
163838 163844
>>163836
>I didn't cite any "science", faggot
All your premise is founded on the globe religion which is based on fake science. If you dispute the Plane, then your are talking about science, actually fake science.
Anonymous
No.163838
>>163837
Wtf does any of that have to do with what I asked?
Anonymous
No.163839
163840
What dumb nigger decided that this thread didn't need IDs? It's the only thread on /vx/ that would actually benefit from IDs.
Anonymous
No.163840
163841
>>163839
>IDs
Actually it is useless, these kikes jump IP like rabbits and to pinpoint them would be an impossible task.
Anonymous
No.163841
163842
>>163840
>implying IDs are useless because shitposter evade them
By that logic, we should remove IDs from the site entirely because the concept of them would be flawed.
IDs make it more difficult to change between contradictory points and sockpuppet mid-conversation, or at least add extra steps to do so.

We put IDs on /vx/ despite the fact that neither /v/, /x/, /tg/, /vg/, /mlp/, or even /int/ have them, perhaps even to the detriment of those elements, just to police /pol/-tier shitposting arguments. Threads with these kinds of arguments should always have IDs.
Anonymous
No.163842
163843
>>163841
>shitposter
Globe shills.
Anonymous
No.163843
>>163842
There are shitposters on both sides, but it's impossible to have even a /pol/-tier conversation because there's no IDs.
Anonymous
No.163844
163847
>>163837
I only asked about the implication of navigators being bribed, because I thought it might be interesting. I didn't say anything for or against the flat earth in that question.
Anonymous
No.163845
Leonardo DiCaprio, Pope Francis, and the Flat Earth picture.webm
Freemasonry-and-Hollywood.jpg
>Leonardo DiCaprio, Pope Francis, and the Flat Earth picture
it tells you everything to need to know about the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.163847
163848
>>163844
>navigators being bribed,
There are plenty of videos where pilots state that Earth is flat.
Anonymous
No.163848
163849
>>163847
Okay, but what about the ones that don't, or the ones that say the contrary?
Anonymous
No.163849
163850
>>163848
I think it is the same case of doctors and nurses that recommended poisonous injections to the public because of the sweet money.
Anonymous
No.163850
163851
>>163849
In every country though? Who would be paying them?
Anonymous
No.163851
163852 163853
upset.gif
>>163850
I sense the jew is back. Asking questions and shooting whataboutisms.
This is /vx/, back to /mlpol/ schlomo.
Anonymous
No.163852
>>163851
>Asking questions
>implying asking questions somehow makes me a kike
If you don't know, just say you don't fucking know.
>whataboutisms
Where did "what about" appear in any of my posts? All I did was ask you to elaborate.
Anonymous
No.163853
163854
>>163851
>This is /vx/, back to /mlpol/
You know, just because it's /vx/ doesn't mean people might not want actual arguments or want their questions answered seriously. That kind of stuff doesn't stand on /x/ either.
Anonymous
No.163854
163856 163860
>>163853
>doesn't mean people might not want actual arguments or want their questions answered seriously.
There is not good faith in you.
Anonymous
No.163855
File (hide): 65E2084A8E84EC788745324F3CE9714A-6809132.webm (6.5 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:00, Flat Earth sun in 2018 AO commerical.webm) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth sun in 2018 AO commerical.webm

Anonymous
No.163856
163857
>>163854
You're accusing me of bad faith, when all you did was sling a series of ad homenim calling me a shill instead of answering my questions? What am I supposed to say to get my questions answered?
Anonymous
No.163857
163860
5202337810_95a1e00232_z-300x225.jpg
>>163856
You have plenty of evidence that the ball is a lie. Go on, tell me that you are not arguing in bad faith.
Anonymous
No.163858
3E9B6EA3713590CA28F625C4CFAF2FB1-32599.png
AE14EE1DF86237F53183B44B05696597-1917868.png
FA365D636D47843896738C7D4DBA1EF7-62407.jpg
2209563.gif
All this stuff just to make a strawman for being rebuked.
Thanks for being being the whole circus I suppose.
But if you are genuine about not curved Earth just stop being a cock sucking garggle blasting fag. Simple, but for you it may not be easy.
Anonymous
No.163859
424.png
>Flat Earth, the sun, and mountains 175 miles away - case closed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqsT2dRCbTg
Anonymous
No.163860
163861
>>163854
I asked you a question to give you the opportunity to explain your worldview. I didn't make any technical or fake "scientific" arguments, I just asked a question about a claim that seemed worthy of skepticism.
If skepticism isn't "good faith" to you, then I must be wasting my time here.
>>163857
I wasn't asking about the fucking ball, I was asking about navigators and pilots being systemically bribed to keep it a secret.
Anonymous
No.163861
163862
>>163860
>coping
Sorry, recognize your loss, this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.163862
163863 163865
my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif
>>163861
>missing the point
>still won't answer basic fucking questions
>no reading comprehension whatsoever
You know, I really was giving you the benefit of the doubt, because I really am open to the prospect that kikes and corporations really could be keeping big secrets about the geography of Antarctica and even the rest of the world, and I thought that was worth discussing, but I now see that I'm dealing with an asinine retard incapable of holding a conversation without resorting to reddit-tier shitflinging.
Sorry for wasting your time. I'll go back to ignoring this shitty thread.
Anonymous
No.163863
163867
>>163862
>I'll go back to ignoring this shitty thread.
Thank you.
Anonymous
No.163864
Gamer Asmongold does a real time Flat Earth poll, and guess what.webm
>Gamer Asmongold does a real time Flat Earth poll, and guess what.
KEK
Anonymous
No.163865
163866
>>163862
>thinking the flatty will argue in good faith, or acknowledge legitimate refutation
Adorable
Anonymous
No.163866
163867
4ate4.png
>>163865
>legitimate refutation
Preposterous.
Anonymous
No.163867
163868
>>163866
Preposterous he says, carefully ignoring every argument that he can't refute, which are many and multi-genre.
Whether from actual incompetence or actual malice, it is clear that you are incapable of arguing in good faith. It seems a clear case of intellectual dishonesty, whatever the cause may be, but you'll continue to posture-post ponies because in your mind thaTs what making an argument is.
>B but, a bunch of WOW-streamer simps are retarded and think the earth is flat!
Yes, it takes a particular type of retardation to follow WoW streamers in current year. Small wonder that half his audience fits the bill. They could still be trolling though.
>>163863
But THIS one is my favorite. Here you have an unobstructed admission from the flatty.
He doesnt want discussion, he doesnt want to dissect the idea and discern truth from fiction, he wants an echo-chamber thread where he can post his tripe and rub circles in his own back about how right he is, nevermind the endless list of phenomena that very clearly illustrate that he's full of shit, has never known what he's talking about, and has the most pathetic grasp of physical dynamics while claiming an 'engineering background, lol, and anyone ELSE should kindly gtfo so he can get back to his FB-tier 'memes'
This has been a public service announcement
Anonymous
No.163868
163869
wFE.png
>>163867
Anonymous
No.163869
163870
>>163868
Cope and seethe, the earth is spherical no matter the level of ignorance you adopt
Anonymous
No.163870
163871 163872
7.png
>>163869
>the earth is spherical
Anonymous
No.163871
163873
>>163870
Theres that pone-posturing I mentioned. Cope and seethe faggot, you're wrong, ad the only reason you dont know it 8s b3cause you insulate yourself with incompet3nce.
Anonymous
No.163872
163873 163874
>>163870
While not intending to, the pone-posturing speaks to another phenomenon that is readily observed in the horsefucker community;
The 'I found a pony reaction image, your argument is therefore invalid' pretense. The idea being overtly, "I can present Twilight(example) in a meme that doubts your position, therefore it's invalid".
The problem is that, this 'argument' neglects the basic requirements of an argument; to indicate invalidity with position(s), and to present a counter-argument with facts.
One may note that this is why the flatty wont argue facts, excepting those 'observed' and recorded by dodgy individuals who have been laughed out of any critical assessment.
But the flatty isnt vying for anything authoritative, no, he is quite content simply to muddy the water; it is well enough for him to suggest that there is legitimate grounds to contest the uni ersal findings that uniformly depict a spherical earth, BECAUSE there are none again, I cant conclude what level of dishonesty that OP is operating from but hes "just so skeptical of nasa masons".
I literally cant ironically parody at that point,.
But to this post's point, its really just a reiteration of the rule about one's carefully worded arguments being sumarrily ignored.
Welcome to the flat earth thread, where feelings dont care about your facts.
Anonymous
No.163873
163875
9394.png
>>163871
>>163872
>pone-posturing
Do you know where you are?
Anonymous
No.163874
cb7.png
>>163872
>Welcome to the flat earth thread, where feelings dont care about your facts.
Anonymous
No.163875
>>163873
Do you? Do you think 'if I post a pony, theres legitimacy to my post'? Do you think 'if I post a pony, then my illegitimate post is somehow legitimate'?
Post all the ponies you want, you're STILL never gonna have a leg to stand on, intellectually.
Anonymous
No.163876
163877 163879 163880
you'd think someone would just fly over antarctica and shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Anonymous
No.163877
163880
>>163876
>shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Actually it will blow it out.
Anonymous
No.163878
d7ifcrl1dvw81.png

Anonymous
No.163879
>>163876
Your argument assumes that the flat earth hasnt been exhaustively debunked previously, except it has. All that remains are flat earthers who can't comprehend the evidence, which unsurprisingly is a gradually increasing number, as the standard of education likewise gradually decreases.
Show people a picture of Earth, its dismissed as CGI. Cite that the picture predates computer generated imagery, its dismissed as Nasa/masonic shilling.
The proof is already there. Its BEEN there since BEFORE any of us were even BORN. Theres more proof than there are technical analysts to explain its VALIDITY as proof.
Which leads one inexorably to the conclusion that Flat Earth has never been about truth. Hence why I say:
Flat Earth is an INcompetence hierarchy
Anonymous
No.163880
>>163876
>>163877
Apologies, I only touched on Antarctica. Funny you propose this, because there is an experienced pilot who is organizing just that.
The thing about a flight over the southern pole is, it takes a particular setup to accomplish. Being as though there arent commercial airstrips on Antarctica, not just ANY plane will do. It requires a plane with the logistical capacity to make the entire trip WITHOUT refueling. Remember when I said 1.5 million chartered? Thats because thats what it is going to cost to charter a provate plane capable of making the flight (and that is WITH the pilot doing the flying for no charge).
Now, flatties LOVE to point to Antarctica because of their certainty of an ice wall. At least, thats the NOT-disingenuous flatties.
Meanwhile, there are the flatty grifters who realize that its bullshit, but their name and livelihood is tied to the flat earth theory (DITRH, etc.) and so they are dug in at 'Antartica' because "no one could possibly expend that much time/resources/effort to fly over Antartica". Meaning, as long as no one DOES, they can continue to posture and act, regardless of the level of intellectual dishonesty they are operating from.
Recall, I already told you whats on Antarctica, and why the international treaty became a thing; its evidence of a megalithic human civilization/technology that defies the historical record to such a degree that the control systems would implode if readily known.
Spoiler alert, its not the masons nor NASA at the heart of it, its the CHURCH.
Anonymous
No.163881
163882
I wrote a long post but happened ot deleteed it. Oh, well. I might rewrite it but the gist of it is that I don't see why we should be fighting. Let us just discuss this impersonal and on topic that goes for both sides to different extents perhaps but still.
Anonymous
No.163882
>>163881
I'll come back and rewrite this. I have reasons for what I'm saying and I don't really know if this short post gives enough context.
Anonymous
No.163884
163886
6aa7892f727325f7.png

Anonymous
No.163886
163887 163890
>>163884
Fake NASA shill, the sun doesnt go behind the earth, it rotates above it. This is clearly intended to undermine flat earth progress in the worldview.
Im false flagging as a/the flatty, if it doesnt come across
Anonymous
No.163887
163888 163889
File (hide): 02D93F38DF2456EE5C3E33B1761BC0B0-11303627.mp4 (10.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:47, Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4
>>163886
>NASA
Well, zog told everybody but normies can't help themselves.
Anonymous
No.163888
163890
>>163887
Fake and shilling. Clearly, since the earth is flat, that any claims of curvature are false.
Cuz the earth is flat.
Checkmate globies.
The earth is FLAT
Anonymous
No.163889
163890
>>163887
Zog convinced everyone that the flat earth is ROUND cuz they're Satanists, and who u gonna believe, satanists or ME who says what god says cuz I say that god says what I say = flat earth, checkmate atheists.
Anonymous
No.163890
163891 163892
>>163888
>>163889
>>163886
Wow, this is just what OP has said throughout this entire thread and not butchered at all. You guys are comedy geniuses.
Anonymous
No.163891
163892 163895
Premiere_063.jpeg
>>163890
>Shills
They (or it?) are applying textbook masonic tactics for gaslighting.
They state exactly what the opposite side says with a tone of incredulity and sometimes mixed with sarcasm in an attempt to discredit and to diminish validity. That said, they will avoid to draw attention to the fact that utterly demolish the whole heliocentric model: the curve can't be found.
Anonymous
No.163892
>>163890
Experience
>>163891
Except for the pics I posted months ago, which you wont touch,... cuz totaly not btfo, couldnt be that...
And my posts aside, you're about 24 citations behind, asfar
as 'refuting' a spherical earth or 'asserting' a flat one
Anonymous
No.163893
163896
fe 1.png
fe 2.png
fe 3.png
fe 4.png
fe 5.png

Anonymous
No.163894
fe 6.png
fe 7.png
fe 8.png
fe 9.png
fe 10.png

Anonymous
No.163895
>>163891
>Shills
>Implying
You sound like /ptg/ calling everyone a 'shill' for disagreeing with you in a flat earth thread on this tiny board.
Anonymous
No.163896
163897
>>163893
Nobody calls flat earthers hateful. They just call them dumb.
Anonymous
No.163897
163898
>>163896
I suppose so but people do call nazis dumb as well so I wouldn't put much stock in what people say.
Anonymous
No.163898
163899
>>163897
Yeah, although I feel like it's a false equivalency. People call Nazis dumb sometimes, but I seldom hear anyone call flat earthers hateful, unless they want to associate them with another group.
Anonymous
No.163899
>>163898
Yeah, we agree on this. I never heard anyone call flat earthers hateful and I don't see how one would argue that they are.
>it's a false equivalency
I think you misunderstood. I meant that people say that everyone that disagrees with consensus is dumb so if you meant, which isn't clear from your post, to appeal to their authority then I disagree that they have one.
This post got a bit overwritten but you get me.
Anonymous
No.163901
163902
Was the post about catapults deleted?
Anonymous
No.163902
>>163901
>catapults
Here >>163824
Anonymous
No.163903
163904
42.png
>Coach Redpill
>2022.06.06 Physics and Epistemic Viciousness
>Dark Matter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHI_eSsgTF4
This is a commentary on the science "experts" who make shit up and sustain lies in order to keep their jobs.
Anonymous
No.163904
163905 173220
>>163903
Dark matter is just a theory, a disputed theory.
Anonymous
No.163905
163908 173220
>>163904
Same than gravity.
Anonymous
No.163908
163940 164141 173220
tn1a6s1y3qd41.jpg
>>163905
Well, I guess you could say that.
In truth, a group of scientists came up with Dark Matter because they considered it to be the only explanation for why gravity seems to function differently at the far edges of the galaxy, as if some extra invisible mass were weighing things down and holding stars together. It's not a theory without merit, as there could be plenty of things beyond this world that we're not able to perceive, but an alternative mode of thought would be that perhaps the laws of physics simply aren't consistent throughout all of the vastness of space.
There are of course other theories to explain this. I think String Theory gives an alternative to it.
Anonymous
No.163940
>>163908
>meme
It sums it all.
Anonymous
No.164025
905.jpg
t7qUo9u.jpeg

Anonymous
No.164027
164028 164029
Imagine being ruled by shitty memes
Seriously, imagine you couldnt think for yourself and had to rely on Facebook to do your thinking for you.
Now i.agine your FB-tier wtfe got btfo and you LITERALLY had no lrg to stand on, but had to pretend cuz 'shame is bad'.
How's that whole 'being a nonce' thing working for you, OP? Learned to differentiate between,.. oh Im kidding. OP doesnt want to actually THINK, he just wants to pretend so that the audience THINKS he's thinking.
But yes I am bad/evil/wtfe ur scripture says is 'bad'.
Keep not doing what you're told is bad. Thats 'healthy', Im told.
Anonymous
No.164028
164029 164030
>>164027
Imagine failing to sage shitty threads.
Anonymous
No.164029
vvvtc34.png
>>164027
>>164028
Ah, (you).
Anonymous
No.164030
164031
>>164028
Imagine thinking that a neglecting of sage was happenstance
Anonymous
No.164031
164032 164033
>>164030
Imagine bumping threads that shit up the board.
Anonymous
No.164032
478.jpg
>>164031
Anonymous
No.164033
>>164031
Imagine wanting the board clean for all the..............

............
nothing
Anonymous
No.164034
If the earth isn't flat why do flights from USA to Japan take time?
Anonymous
No.164035
164036 164037
maxresdefault.jpg
20.png
>PhD Proves Globe Model False (4:34 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6J7WDjXouc
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/phd-proves-globe-model-false-re-uploaded:1
Anonymous
No.164036
164354
Screenshot_20220609-033336_DuckDuckGo.jpg
>>164035
Whoops, thats's embarrassing
Anonymous
No.164037
>>164035
Let me guess, you calculate Pi as 3.14, don't you?
Anonymous
No.164055
164056 164085
cpc.jpg
Hey OP, I was just in another one of my random information on the internet comas and I have a genuine question:
What causes the circumpolar current around the latitude of Drake's Passage (pic related on ball Earth)
Since there's no rotation, nor is there gravity, what would push this much water around?
Anonymous
No.164056
164057
>>164055
See >>163033
Anonymous
No.164057
164058 164059
>>164056
well, not quite. This explains the tides (kinda, I'm not entirely happy with "well, we don't know but its not the moon") but it doesn't explain the uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude. If tides were caused by the bobbing of the earth's surface in the ocean, as explained by Mr. Dubay, there would be a uniform reaction towards the ice wall, not round it. Think ripples in a pond.
Anonymous
No.164058
>>164057
I suppose I spoke too soon because I didn't finish the video, but even the second explanation of the world mountain and the whirlpool doesn't explain uniform motion around the poles. If this were the case, you'd see almost no circumpolar current, or a circumpolar current that reverses with the tides.
Anonymous
No.164059
164060
>>164057
>uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude
I guess we have to wait for access for independent researchers.
The freemason's "just trust us" is not cutting it any longer.
Anonymous
No.164060
164061
>>164059
Independent researchers are allowed to sail the Drake Passage and the circumpolar open ocean. In fact, Dubay references quite a few of them in his videos. Are you saying Dubay is referencing Masons?
Anonymous
No.164061
164062
>>164060
Don't play dumb, you perfectly know that I'm referring to the area under the 60th parallel, specifically Antarctica.
Anonymous
No.164062
164063
>>164061
I'm not. The circumpolar ocean current starts at the southern tip of South America.
Anonymous
No.164063
164064
>>164062
>starts
Says who?
Anonymous
No.164064
164065 164066
>>164063
Hendrik Brouwer (Dutch explorer who developed the route through the current in the early 1600s for spice trade with India)
James Cook (circumnavigated the polar region, iirc he's specifically mentioned by Dubay)
Vito Dumas did so single-handedly during WWII without any knowledge or assistance from world governments
I'll keep looking if you need more names
Anonymous
No.164065
>>164064
oh, and Jon Sanders of Australia has done it 11 times.
Anonymous
No.164066
164067
>>164064
Dude, I sailed the Drake channel 10 years ago two times, I know the place and is hell when choppy, the strong currents are normal because the waters accelerate at that point. Frequently and unexpected weather conditions are the norm, they change without warning in a matter of a couple of hours.
Anonymous
No.164067
164068
>>164066
have you circumnavigated at that latitude? All of these people mentioned (excepting Brouwer) did.
Anonymous
No.164068
164069
>>164067
>circumnavigated
Not circumnavigation, but circurm-continent voyage.
Anonymous
No.164069
164070
>>164068
so you went round Cape Horn. I'm... proud? of you? but by your reckoning you're missing about 50 thousand miles of journey.
Anonymous
No.164070
164071
>>164069
>Cape Horn
It is called Cabo the Hornos by the locals.
Anonymous
No.164071
164072 164075
>>164070
Sure. We're getting off track. I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into. Are you willing to do so, or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong?
Anonymous
No.164072
164073 164096
>>164071
>I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into
The only trusted source is your own eyes. Sailing there without interference.
Anonymous
No.164073
164074
>>164072
Then why reference all these ancient and modern sources when you haven't seen these things with your own eyes? This isn't a disputed fact. Your sources confirm it, my sources confirm it, ball earth sources confirm it, there's a current that goes steadly east to west round the world at the latitudes south of the three southern capes and north of Antarctica. Nobody disputes this that's been round the world at that latitude, including sources you yourself have put forward. Its established fact.
Anonymous
No.164074
>>164073
my apologies, steadily west to east. map dyslexia getting the better of me once again
Anonymous
No.164075
164076
>>164071
>or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong
Enough derailing, the chart is already established and clear faggot >>149243
By the way, that map is super accurate when using a sextant.
Anonymous
No.164076
164077
>>164075
okay, I'm not disputing the map, the shape of the earth, or any other point you've brought up. I simply want to know what your explanation is for an established, fairly stable circumpolar current (and I suppose the winds that go with it, but that's very likely explainable in your model by the motion of the water)
Anonymous
No.164077
164078 164097
>>164076
Again, independent research is needed.
Anonymous
No.164078
164079
>>164077
Independent research has been done and matches the facts I've presented. If its not independent enough for you, I'm terribly sorry, but if someone who is actively hiding from world governments (Vito Dumas) makes the claim, I'm going to call them independent
Anonymous
No.164079
164080 164097
8495.gif
>>164078
>Independent research has been done and matches the facts
Sure.
Anonymous
No.164080
164081
south-edged-equal-azimuth.jpg
>>164079
I accept your concession.

By the way, if you'd just said "it matches up when you view the whole oceanic current map in context of the flat earth" I would have probably taken you at face value, but you're so tied to the very few sources you have that you can't do independent research yourself.

I still don't know if your theory has any merit, but I'm 100% sure now that you, personally, do not.
Anonymous
No.164081
164082 164085
>>164080
In fact, I'm going to go absolutely top tier schizophrenic here and note a few things.
In this diagram, the redder a current, the warmer its water, and per established science, these are the surface currents, whilst cold blue currents are usually much deeper. IF your polar gyre exists, you could explain these currents as warm water being sucked into the pole from the surface, and cold water being pushed back down through the deep ocean. This removes the need for a "breathing" gyre and allows a much more plausible forceful, periodic underswell, possibly because this supposed northern polar whirlpool exists inland on the aforementioned 4 islands, and it "runs out" of water because its recycling effect exceeds the inflow of surface water. Since the land surface, per Dubay, rests ON the ocean, not on underlying crust, this allows for a massive inflow of water to the central reservoir, a relatively quick emptying of the reservoir _under_ the land surface, and a repeat.

There, I just answered your question for you, since you're completely incapable of independent thought.
Anonymous
No.164082
229.png
>>164081
Anonymous
No.164083
164086 164087
How remiss of me
https://youtu.be/7u61hzEG82s
Anonymous
No.164085
164090
>>164055
>>164081
Welcome to the flat earth thread
Anonymous
No.164086
164089 164095 164098
>>164083
>Sci-Fi Dan
A prominent NASA paid shill.
Anonymous
No.164087
164089 164093 164094
>>164083
C'mon, it is obvious that it is about to make fun of a dumbass that can barely articulate his thoughts.
The NASA ballers can rapidly extinguish the Flat Earth discoveries if debate is arranged, but, like the jews they won't do that and pick on low hanging fruits instead while claiming to be on the right.
Imagine if the negro tyson would debate Dubay, but... NASA knows that will be PR disaster.
Anonymous
No.164089
164091
>It hurts to Change your world view: The Thread
Flatters will cope forever.
>>164087
>>164086
>NASA
Nasa has no power you retards.
Anonymous
No.164090
>>164085
Thanks. The problem here seems to be that Dubay has an extremely compelling and calming voice. I watched his history of flat earth and I was honesty a little hooked until he went on his autistic tard rage about the flat earth society
Anonymous
No.164091
164092 164095
>>164089
>Nasa has no power you retards.
I disagree.
You believe all their lies, right?
Anonymous
No.164092
>>164091
Nigger what lies do they even tell?
Anonymous
No.164093
>>164087
>Tyson wont argue rhetoric with a virtual child cuz NASA is scared of the blowback
Imagine unironically thinking this
Anonymous
No.164094
>>164087
yes, acknowledging Dubay as worth debating would be a PR disaster
Anonymous
No.164095
164369
>>164086
>>164091
NASA had to sell all its infrastructure to Elon Musk and outsource its rocks to Russia to stay afloat, and it still can't get congress to fund any of its projects (gotta send that tax money to Israel for their space program instead). Wtf do you think they have the funding to do that?
Anonymous
No.164096
>>164072
>this much goalpost moving
So, you'll only accept direct, personal empirical evidence for ideas that challege your worldview, but you're willing to cite sketchy youtube videos for ones that reinforce it?
Talk about hypocrisy.
Anonymous
No.164097
164369
>>164077
>>164079
Define "independent research".
Anonymous
No.164098
164100 164369
>>164086
>NASA paid shill
Citation unironically needed. I wasted an hour looking for any real evidence of this.
Anonymous
No.164099
0b0fbfa14ac00ef11a6354bebaacd4d1--you-ve.jpg
OP is a retarded faggot.
Anonymous
No.164100
>>164098
welcome to the Flat Earth thread, where "paid shill" means "disagrees with my retarded ideology"
Anonymous
No.164117
164118 164121
bs.jpeg
I think this may fit here:

>Russian space chief speaks out on UFOs
https://www.sott.net/article/468677-Russian-space-chief-speaks-out-on-UFOs
Anonymous
No.164118
164119
>>164117
Well, in the last months the UFO psyop went into overdrive in the States, now the Russians join. Is any doubt left that they are together in the space deception?
Anonymous
No.164119
164120
image.png
>>164118
Anonymous
No.164120
fluffle-puff-gif-20.gif
>>164119
Anonymous
No.164121
img3487.jpeg
>>164117
Anonymous
No.164123
XVA3TlB_AzM.jpeg
>V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946) - (2:02 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVA3TlB_AzM
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/v-2-rocket-films-(flat)-earth-in-(1946):a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2XEoiKjE4kAJ/
Anonymous
No.164124
iiIpOs4FgwY.jpg
File (hide): D18735052A2F0A6F941188E72C6DEE14-5067431.mp4 (4.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:00, Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4
>Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.
Good music.
Anonymous
No.164125
164126 164127
>>148614
rate of rotation is not measured in mph.
The earth rotates at 7.29x10^-5 rads/s. Of course you can't feel it spinning. If you were on a roundabout that was spinning at that rate, you would not even be able to see it moving let alone feel anything.
Anonymous
No.164126
>>164125
>rate of rotation is not measured in mph
And yet on the surface and according to the freemasons we are moving at incredible speeds.
Anonymous
No.164127
164129
>>164125
You tried, but OP feels the best defense is a solid ignorance
Anonymous
No.164129
164145 164146
0a.jpg
>>164127
>You tried
Nope, that faggot is trying to obfuscate when bringing angular speeds which are supposedly constant.
Anonymous
No.164141
>>163908
Dark matter has exactly zero relavence to flat earth. Yes the models are incomplete this is known. But they are more than sufficient to describe our solar system. Even classic newtonian gravity is good enough for the most part.
Anonymous
No.164145
>>164129
Wait till he gets to the lack of comprehension that a sphereoid object has a dissimilar sloping curve depending on what longitude one observes the planet at, and that there is no 'single calculation' for the distance to the horizon