/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
Anonymous
No.148614
148828
HIGH ALTITUDE FOOTAGE - 22 MILES ABOVE EARTH.mp4
High altitude footage, 22 miles above earth; and a reminder of the math coming from the heliocentric model.
Anonymous
No.148618
>>148613
>floating in space
Would you be so kind as to offer a counter proposal?
Anonymous
No.148621
216e40c10fc21cd5 1.jpg
Because this board is /vx/, the opening posts about Flat Earth should be addressed in proper fashion and I found the right /x/ stuff for the occasion.
Even if you reject the Flat Earth idea, just follow the below narrative as a /x/ fascinating mystery story, You'll learn a lot of incredible and undeniable facts with huge entertainment value. You won't be disappointed, guaranteed.
If you are one of those impatient anons, no problem, go ahead and jump to the last episode for the culmination, but the narrative won't taste the same, either way, it is not for narrow minds.

>The Lost History of Flat Earth - by Ewaranon (2020)
Odysee links in HD.

>Episode 1 - "Buried in Plain Sight"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/11:9
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q5SoQNkVIGgE/

>Episode 2 - "A Lens Into the Past"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-12:f
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jiSCnFRC93wm/

>Episode 3 - "Inheritors of Mud & Magnificence"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-13:2
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XaxSAOknYfgq/

>Episode 4 - "Back to the Future"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-14:7
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cHJm9mbgCTKq/

>Episode 5 - "The Whispering of the Water"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-15:2
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xixTVlEXDc7E/

>Episode 6 - "Offerus and the Alchemist"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-16:3
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TX1hZe7rcpJ/

>Episode 7 - The Known World
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-1-7:5
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mRQ9P6Ij5Uqs/
Anonymous
No.148626
148701
>>148613
How can the earth be Flat if its a sphere and hollow. Check mate retards
Anonymous
No.148701
File (hide): B6DE61CDB15F86E04B52D8F2C088D735-31330454.webm (29.9 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:05:00, Flat Earth in 5 Minutes.webm) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth in 5 Minutes.webm
>>148626
Try to check mate this genius.
Anonymous
No.148828
148877 148938
>>148613
I live by the ocean. I look out the window and I see ships sink below the horizon bottom first. Sperg. This is shit people knew 2300 years ago. Aristotle talked about it. Eratosthenes not only physically proved it was round but also measured it accurately using angles and shadows (something you can still do today). Aristotle also talked about how gravity would necessarily collapse things into a ball, and yes, you can measure gravity yourself. My friend has done it.
https://physicsteacher.in/2020/12/24/how-to-measure-universal-gravitational-constant-measurement-of-g/

>>148614
It's called momentum and a vacuum. When you fly on an airplane do you feel movement when not accelerating? Then remove the air so there's no turbulence either and that's what we have. And with the video, it's not that high up. The atmosphere is a lot thinner than the earth is big, and any sphere looked at from a shallow angle and without seeing depth looks like a disk.
Anonymous
No.148877
148976
>>148828
>gravity
Gravitation is a concept invented to explain the heliocentric model, it was widely theorized with math by Newton and the Church of England begun to teach it around the world.
In the Terra centric model, gravity doesn't exist, above and below are the parameters together with density.
Anonymous
No.148884
148885 150415
200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball!.pdf
1758.png
3.jpeg
4.jpeg
5.jpeg
Book:
>200 Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball! - by Eric Dubay - (2017)
Anonymous
No.148885
150415
maxresdefault.jpg
>>148884
Also that book/presentation was made in video:

>200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball (HD Remastered)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEaHjPF47_E
Anonymous
No.148917
148922
I guess this might sound wierd but I don't really care either way.
I'm a bit curious, though. If the earth is flat, are there pictures of the edge?
Anonymous
No.148922
148983
>>148917
>If the earth is flat, are there pictures of the edge?
No, it is forbidden by the UN to even approach Antarctica. Only the military of the countries signatory of the Antarctic Treaty are allowed there.
Anonymous
No.148938
148976
gzrg.jpeg
cgnfgh.png
drhd.png
>>148828
>It's called momentum and a vacuum. When you fly on an airplane do you feel movement when not accelerating?
Check this out:

>Uniform Circular Motion is Constant Acceleration
>Consult any mainstream science publication or ask any science teacher "why can't we feel the Earth spinning?" and they will unanimously reply that it is because the globe spins at a perfect constant speed, and we can only feel acceleration or deceleration. As CoolCosmos writes: "Earth moves very fast. It spins at a speed of about 1,000 miles per hour and orbits around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles per hour. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant. You can only feel motion if your speed changes. For example, if you are in a car which is moving at a constant speed on a smooth surface, you will not feel much motion. However, when the car accelerates or when the brakes are applied, you do feel motion." The glaring problem with this claim rarely ever addressed is that the globe and everything on it, if it existed, would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform circular motion IS constant acceleration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAI3RNlMiFE
Anonymous
No.148951
148978 149114
31244d93bf05b58acb224e25cd5cc95a.png
28157460972_7b1594065b_b.jpg
ClKlJSIWQAEK9hu.jpg
ello-optimized-0ca605e8.gif
EwwqgelXIAAW7Jq.jpg

Anonymous
No.148952
148978 149021
f4a2564426137942ed6aaa5d70e45f75.gif
un.png
flat_sea_level.png
ggg-1.jpg
image0.jpg

Anonymous
No.148976
148977
>>148877
>In the Terra centric model, gravity doesn't exist
First, no, geocentric models still had gravity, but second that would just make it retarded.

>>148938
>would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform circular motion IS constant acceleration
No, it isn't. It's not speeding up or slowing down, spin doesn't mean acceleration.
Anonymous
No.148977
148978
df5.jpg
>>148976
>geocentric models still had gravity
Gravity = gravitation, and no, in the geocentric model what matters is "density", gravity is an invention to explain forces among fictional celestial bodies.

>>148976
>spin doesn't mean acceleration
Okay, get inside a washer machine and experience the centrifuge force, then come back and tell me spin doesn't mean constant acceleration.
Anonymous
No.148978
148979 148980
1749267.png
>>148951
>>148952
That's not how spheres work. Any sphere looked at without depth looks like a flat disk from any angle. So is there a way to see the depth, aka the curve that's heading away from you? Well, yeah. Ships disappear from the bottom up instead of shrinking indefinitely.

>>148977
>gravity is an invention to explain forces among fictional celestial bodies
Historically people believed in gravity way way before heliocentrism. They're not really related. It was viewed more like objects moving towards "their natural state", but a force that pulled them down depending on their mass still.

>in the geocentric model what matters is "density"
Ok. Run a simulation in your head for me. You have a tank of water, in it is a beach ball. The beach ball is less dense than the water. Then what? What happens? You need a force acting on the mass to pull the water underneath so the beach ball is pushed up. What force is it that pulls on matter?

>Okay, get inside a washer machine and experience the centrifuge force, then come back and tell me spin doesn't mean constant acceleration.
1) That's not acceleration. Acceleration means speeding up, but every part keeps moving at the same speed. A centrifugal force isn't acceleration.
2) Do you get thrown off a merry-go-round when standing on it? What about one that only rotates once every 24h the size of a planet? Tangential speed doesn't mean a force, and we actually spin pretty slowly very far from the centre of the spin, meaning there's next to no force put on us.
Anonymous
No.148979
149113
>>148978
>and we actually spin pretty slowly very far from the centre of the spin, meaning there's next to no force put on us.
Speed = 0 at the poles.
Anonymous
No.148980
148982 148987
1538565351952.jpg
1538246193722m.jpg
2062738__safe_smolder_ocellus_yona_female_cute_edit_text_cropped_changeling_crying_image+macro_offscreen+character_sad_caption_reaction+image_changed.png
>>148978
>1) That's not acceleration. Acceleration means speeding up, but every part keeps moving at the same speed. A centrifugal force isn't acceleration.
It is rotational acceleration.
Why?
Because the forces acted on the object accelerate and deaccelerate (that means accelerating in the opposite direction).
I want you to have a circle, now have a stick or pencil or some shit.
Make the pencil go around the circle so it's perpendicular to the center.
That's the direction of the force. Changes in direction (angles and degrees) need to be acted upon.
So yes it is accelerating.
It can maintain rotational acceleration or change in rotational acceleration.

>Thread is pics related.
Acting dumb for shits and giggles is fun until you're surrounded by bottomless pits and professional idiots.
Keep in mind glowniggers and 'tarded urinary brainpan where you are. I'd recommend you'd stop while you're still ahead.
Anonymous
No.148982
Bombassteawithbombasspones.png
>>148980
To clarify the perpendicular is the direction of acceleration.
>Make the pencil go around the circle so it's perpendicular to the center.
>The direct connection to the edge of the imaginary circle is the direction of the force so that it moves around the perimeter of that circle . Changes in direction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ9AH2S8B6Y
Anonymous
No.148983
bcc.png
>>148922
GUARDIANS OF THE EDGE. FUCKING BRILLIANT!!!
Anonymous
No.148984
157751
Asking to be spoon fed.png
Prove to me it's flat.png

Anonymous
No.148987
51.png
>>148980
>Keep in mind glowniggers and 'tarded urinary brainpan where you are. I'd recommend you'd stop while you're still ahead.
Chillax anon.
There are plenty of inconsistencies about the tall tale that we live on a ball.
It is so simple as to take a look and judge for yourself.
Anonymous
No.148988
149160 149630
BH81dnOqC10F0g9wLKsCUslX.jpg
File (hide): A986E628ADB28AC44FBA13D5E164DCE5-3962759.mp4 (3.8 MB, Resolution:480x360 Length:00:01:28, EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.mp4
The History of Flat Earth
>From the beginning of recorded history, and for thousands upon thousands of years, cultures across the entire world all believed the Earth was flat. Their various cosmologies and cosmogonies differed in slight ways but their overall geographies and astronomies were incredibly consistent and in fact virtually identical. The Earth was a stationary plane void of any motion or curvature, flat across its entire expanse except of course for hills, mountains and valleys. The North Pole was the magnetic mono-pole center-point of the flat Earth with Polaris, the North Pole star situated directly above. Polaris was the only motionless star in the heavens with all the other constellations revolving perfect circles over the Earth every night. The stars were divided into two categories known as the fixed stars and the wandering stars. The fixed stars were so-called because they were observed then as we can observe today to stay fixed in their constellation patterns night after night, year after year, century after century, never changing their relative positions. The wandering stars, what are today referred to as “planets,” were so-called because they were observed then as we can observe today to wander the heavens taking their own unique spirograph-like patterns making both forward and retrograde motions over and around the Earth during their cycles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQCXT2pkans
Mirror: https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/TheHistoryofFlatEarth:3
Anonymous
No.148997
Freemason Science.png

Anonymous
No.148998
retired astronaut miroslaw hermaszewski says earth is flat.mp4
>Retired astronaut Miroslaw Hermaszewski says earth is flat.
>Mirosław Hermaszewski is a retired Polish Air Force officer and cosmonaut. He became the first Polish national in space, when he flew aboard the Soviet Soyuz 30 spacecraft in 1978.
Be sarcasm or not, it gives something to wonder.
Anonymous
No.148999
149021
13319991_10154190153969293_4497998689689066340_n.jpg
13557777_10154425074812868_3449646834900043559_n.jpg
13686732_10155080187473916_7638657560704061215_n.jpg
13615254_10154988989848916_7297770299845639125_n.jpg
13620379_10210152618830996_7068970089046039028_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149006
12188973_835947749858985_7587837116332086854_n.jpg
12194714_1099199473432546_1370258105500317540_o.jpg
12345574_10153920828139789_8324631083290181413_n.jpg
12438963_10207375778107016_160422834393011052_n.jpg
12805812_1563831277265596_2901413702458475686_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149007
sydney-santiago.jpg
Actual flight routes from Sydney, Australia to Santiago, Chile.
Curious, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.149018
149019 149021
Why would anybody want to cover up that the world is flat?
>inb4 Jews
Why though? To what end?
Anonymous
No.149019
149020 149021
>>149018
>Why would anybody want to cover up that the world is flat?
One reason I've heard is that it moves us from God. A globe earth in a vast universe makes us insignificant in the grand scheme, removes the spiritual connection we had, and turns people into atheists. And people who don't believe in God and the importance of our existence are easier to dupe and turn away from God and good.
Anonymous
No.149020
149022 149111
>>149019
The idea of the earth as a speck in a vast universe doesn't move us away from god. It just shows that God's greatness it more than we could ever comprehend.
Anonymous
No.149021
149029 149037 149114
>>148999
>>149018
>>149019
You do understand all intelligence agencies love being able to implant any idea or belief in anyone. Doesn't matter if it's true or false.
It's because they can. Not if they should, but could they do it.

So how does a flat Earth help anyone?
What benefits does it have that are exclusive to that in comparison to the standard Earth thinking?
Otherwise it's pointless trying to convince people about something utterly worthless.
>>148952
From anywhere in the world according to them you'll always be able to see the ice wall. It's completely flat right? Ice is typically white. So if you send a laser beam to that it'll reflect back and everyone will see big shaking beams of light.
How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall. Then go off the little disk you think the Earth is.
Anonymous
No.149022
149023
>>149020
I'm not sure how the full explanation goes as I'm just paraphrasing from what I loosely remember seeing.
Anonymous
No.149023
149027
>>149022
Is this what you believe?
Anonymous
No.149027
>>149023
I assume you believe that you live on a spinning ball and your ancestors were monkeys.
Anonymous
No.149029
149055
>>149021
>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall.
Well, the problem with that is that the UN is threatening with violence anyone wanting to explore the zone, as you realize the common peasants have not means to defend themselves against ships' artillery.
Anonymous
No.149037
149055
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
>>149021
>Otherwise it's pointless trying to convince people about something utterly worthless
Redpilling is never pointless.
And the consequences of a Flat Earth are big. Imagine most of the so called scientists being ridiculed for their stupidity and dishonesty because they have chosen career and money over science and truth.
Imagine all governments pushing the lie being unmasked for their collusion about space programs, which brings into focus if most politicians and government career employees involved are anti-national agents executing orders from their gurus in the lodges.
Anon, fetching the freemasons to the foreground is casting light on the jewish hidden hand.
Anonymous
No.149055
149071
>>149029
You do realize video of being shot at is a piece of proof for your cause right?
>>149037
>Makes scientists salty
>Proof that everything is a lie
Well prove it, you have the plethora of models but you also need to do stuff with it that what people call normal do.
Unless you like tieing your shoelaces together before you even start.
Anonymous
No.149071
149105 158051 162816
15178998_10103495894266818_4131841977607878122_n.jpg
16427504_2207448179479833_766779611374271250_n.jpg
18221979_1514168511961467_5232080132222084985_n.jpg
53.png
>>149055
>Well prove it,
Have you even read this thread?
Have you ever read and understood something about physics? If you didn't, don't worry.
Just the very basic first step for you. If this realm' shape is a ball, trigonometry says that at the first mile the horizon should drop 8 inches, 32 inches at the second mile, and so on. Simple light reflection on the water denies that. Experiments with lasers on the water also deny any curvature. So, where the hell is the curve?
Whan
Anonymous
No.149105
149108
UUUU.gif
VVVV.png
BunchaSquares.gif
>>149071
That's not my point.
You're making a fool of yourselves in such a way people will remember it when it matters most.
Ya'll dun fucked up. To such a degree that even jokers would cease. No the ones that watch the jokers would have an ax to grind.
Then there's ponies and actually escaping the hell ya'll found yourselves in. You could stay there in your mind maybe have to go on day by day till you could actually have an ounce of self agency.
You do know they don't actually need you right? I get that's what you've signed up for, but you could take backesies.
You know that if they wanted you to do such a mission they'll frame the aircraft as another post. Amongst these.
Are the side benefits that good?
Is it a future promise by people that are meticulous in cleaning up every loose end? That you'll trust them? By the time you'd put the counter action into motion to recieve your dues from them they'll recieve dues into you.
That's...
If you so desperately want your chains that'll snuff it before your promised prizes It'd argue against that.
Not stupidly mind you, just out of professionalism at the very least.
So that's why the actual big wigs don't take any of you seriously. To me? That'd hurt quite a bit. That you're running their iconocracy for them you'd stick to being the monkey. Their monkey.
Well that's illuminating but doesn't seem all that bright. Anyway sorry about the psy flag on the files, but you do need to at least hear this.
Dream on little dorgy dream a dream for squee. I'd break down the complicated multi message ciphers but that'll waste the point fo perfectly crafted individual messages.
Do they package such things for you? I suppose that counts but seems to me rather cold much like where restructuring and shaving the important proportions in a slavery that from that point ever more may probably be everevereverever.
The ocean sends his regards. Make of that as you will. Laying about just won't seperate it anymore.
I'm truly, not sorry, but a sort of empathic sympathy not necessarily mine. Protip, every four letters because it's wwww.
Yes like the band. Not that band the blander one that's obvious.
it's all up to you -song lyric
Anonymous
No.149108
149116 151702
12985609_10153765032723138_2373695083229142377_n.jpg
12993479_10153765033223138_2466106082904053476_n.jpg
13000093_10201403957216124_5709800593971380303_n.jpg
13000265_10153765028963138_1297600089255160361_n.jpg
13001164_10153765002073138_2733709319793178327_n.jpg
>>149105
>deflecting
If you live on a ball, where is the curve?
The most basic question and still no answer.
Anonymous
No.149110
149650
14712526_2128314564059862_4729204600220941288_o.jpg
Where is the curve?
Anonymous
No.149111
149172
er.jpeg
>>149020
Pretty much.
Anonymous
No.149113
151703
img_9608.jpeg
>>148979
Anonymous
No.149114
149115 149116 158743
162553-nature-landscape-winter-snow-cold-ship-sea-iceberg-Antarctica-technology-vehicle-Polarstern.jpg
antarctic sound.jpg
B15K-II-Mike_Usher.jpg
mp_11.jpg
349EBDB6-3B7C-4B50-ABAD17A0F3B4EB14_source.jpeg
>>149021
>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall. Then go off the little disk you think the Earth is.
You are really upset anon.

>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall.
Actually there are a couple of tours in summer to Antarctica for around 8,000/10,000 per passenger, leaving from Argentina, if I'm not mistaken they visit a peninsula far to the north from the real antarctic ice shelf, but according to current "official" pictures and the descriptions of captain J. Cook, see first pic >>148951 ; the edge is real.
Anonymous
No.149115
158743
>>149114
Okay, theres an oceanic Ice wall in Antarctica. Captain Cook described it. Kudos. Its still a remarkable stretch to use that to justify a flat earth. Maybe Im coming into this late, and there are a few points ITT that make me 'hmmm', but 'not having an answer = flat earth' is not an argument. Where is the evidence?
Anonymous
No.149116
149123
197.png
>>149108
>>149114
There's a difference between knowing you're big and thinking you're big.
Seems to me you lack the mental abilities in creating to scale dimensions. I'm sorry for your loss.
Anonymous
No.149121
33453586492322.jpg

Anonymous
No.149123
149124 149125
98041.jpg
nikon-p900_zoom.jpg
sewet.jpg
>>149116
>Seems to me you lack the mental abilities in creating to scale dimensions.
It looks like you didn't do the research.
Optical experiments demonstrate over and over again that there's no curve.
Take in count that you don't need expensive equipment to debunk the curve (Nikon P900 and P1000), remember that on this hypothetical ball the horizon should fall 8 inches the first mile and 32 inches the second one.
So, it is now "Reproducible Experiments" (real science) versus the "Established Agreed Truth" (propaganda).

But let us see what the "authoritative" priests have to say about Flat Earth (fascinating establishment damage control):
>Buzzfeed's Fake Flat Earth Theory Debunked
>In the following presentation head of the International Flat Earth Research Society responds and corrects several misconceptions and falsehoods in Buzzfeed Multiplier's video "The Flat Earth Theory Explained."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecnlz7SXDCk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Buzzfeed's-Fake-Flat-Earth-Theory-Debunked:4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/G3QjI1gtPpZQ/

>NASAs Top Globe Proofs Debunked
>In the following presentation the President of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay debunks NASA's Assistant Director for Science Communication Michelle Thaller's top "proofs" that Earth is a spinning ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/NASA's-Top-Globe-Proofs-Debunked:e
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zBj0xAEOCYDS/

>Flat Earth Science: Not Wrong or Stupid
>In the following presentation International Flat Earth Research Society president Eric Dubay debunks science communicator Sabine Hossenfelder's video "Flat Earth Science: Wrong but not Stupid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rebktApD31I
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Flat-Earth-Science-Not-Wrong-or-Stupid:1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/R7gDpjIvWJvW/

>Theoretical Astronomy Debunked by Empirical Reality
>In the following presentation astronomer Dr. Stuart Clark's video "An Astronomer Responds to Flat Earth Theory" is refuted and debunked by the president of the International Flat Earth Research Society.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXyot6Coe58
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Theoretical-Astronomy-Debunked-by-Empirical-Reality:6
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2dkN9u5I7jWY/

> Neil Tyson's Flat Earth Star Talk Debunked
>In the following presentation the President of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay debunks astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson's top "proofs" that Earth is a spinning ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Neil-Tyson's-Flat-Earth-Star-Talk-Debunked:1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VaiSf0uJOMth/
Anonymous
No.149124
maxresdefault.jpg
>>149123
>Take in count that you don't need expensive equipment to debunk the curve (Nikon P900 and P1000)
It is an impressive camera/telescope

>INCREDIBLE ZOOM | Nikon P1000 | Ben Lomond | Scotland
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhQlwKX3LQA
>Two Planets, a Star, and a Moon - Nikon P1000 Camera
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGvV_GcOkjs
>Nikon P1000 - Maximum Zoom Range Test (93 KM / 57 Miles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Sx3rAdz2SA
>Nikon P900 zoom test, "readable" distances
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRp13pRzzWQ
Anonymous
No.149125
149126
>>149123
You can do the experiments correctly but still manage to fuck up on decoding the meaning.
Get one of those planetary telescopes, you know the ones that looks really far away the consumer commercial kind.
Then try to find another content. Heck you could find the ice wall and see right past it. 'Cause according to you if the Earth is flat you should be able to see that far.
All of it. Just turning around completely to see the whole world in under twenty seconds.
No risking it all, no leaving the house (unless you live in a ditch), nothing at all strenuous or strange.
All that you would have to do is record the thing. Wouldn't that be cool.
Unless you're telling me that's also impossible.
Anonymous
No.149126
149131
>>149125
You are misinterpreting the experiment. I'm not sure if it is because of your lack of knowledge on physics or just trolling.
The point of zooming is not about how far is possible to see, but to demonstrate that there is not any curvature hiding ships or objects.
Anonymous
No.149127
2630.png

Anonymous
No.149131
149142 149160 149174
>>149126
How far are you zooming?
You do realize that the earth only appears flat at ground level because of its sheer enormity, right?
Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
Anonymous
No.149142
149169 156645
Eqyf57fXMAAIWqm.jpg
851.jpg
Dowrt.png
se.jpg
>>149131
>You do realize that the earth only appears flat at ground level because of its sheer enormity, right?
Read the whole thread faggot, there are plenty of videos debunking the curve by bringing objects supposedly hidden behind the horizon in full view.
Also read about trigonometry, it's not difficult, math proves that the curve is a lie. But if it is too convoluted for you, then a CAD software like AutoCAD might do the trick for you in a graphical fashion.
Anonymous
No.149160
149168 149169
703.png
>>149131
>Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
It's debunked.
See clip >>148988
Anonymous
No.149168
149634 156646
earth-curvature-scale.jpg
>>149160
By the way, as seen in that clip, the distance from the observer (camera) to the boat is at least 2 or 3 miles. Trigonometry says that the boat's hull should be hidden by the curvature from 32 to 72 inches, see pic for the values.
Obviously that is not happening and the claim of the Earth being a ball is busted. NASA and all paid shill scientists are lying.
Anonymous
No.149169
149170
34EDE13AC067E81844615BD590B37673-675023.png
1569647083100-4.jpeg
92A9784DAEDE374BB1F7F3EBAF5480D4-111684.jpg
3642AC40E894DB78FAA4007DFE3EFE56-16768.png
>>149160
You're just going to accept a video without proving it yourself. What are you a sheep?
>>149142
I guess you are...
Anonymous
No.149170
149173 149174
2zoyl4m0a9tz.png
261006.jpg
>>149169
Anonymous
No.149171
149172
>>148613
niggle me this flat earthers. why would the jews lie about the shape of the earth?
Anonymous
No.149172
149173
>>149171
See >>149111
Anonymous
No.149173
9ECDA514F9170D903A7E1DC01352C58E-875324.gif
A8C3C14AA1A25A987F661D506E1FCF98-250570.png
>>149170
>>149172
And what other reasons. You know there's more you want to say.
Anonymous
No.149174
149177
20170812_102028.jpg
20170812_105059.jpg
20170812_123720.jpg
20170904_072335.jpg
>>149131
>Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
How about when you're on top of a mountain? If the Earth really is "flat", then you should be able to look out and see even taller mountains far beyond.
<Instead, you just get this.

>>149170
>Second pic
That's another thing, how is all the water able to stay on "Earth" if it's flat? Also, aren't tectonic plates basically tearing apart the world? Wouldn't that mean that Earth would have been "destroyed" millions of years ago?
Anonymous
No.149177
149178
>>149174
>how is all the water able to stay on "Earth" if it's flat?
It appears to be contained by the Antarctic edge, But can't be confirmed because the UN and its associates will violently oppose any exploration.
Anonymous
No.149178
149203
>>149177
>It appears to be contained by the Antarctic edge
Then, isn't the U.N. in the right for getting all their knickers in a knot over global warming?
Anonymous
No.149203
149208
>>149178
>global warming
You know that that is another psy-op. Right?
Anonymous
No.149208
149219
>>149203
So, the multiple ice ages and warmer periods like during the dinosaurs are all psi-ops?
Anonymous
No.149219
149223 149226
you must be new here.png
>>149208
Global warming is a psy-op prepared from the 70s by the Club of Rome, another globalist club founded to shape international policy.
Check the Great Reset thread for further redpilling newfag >>>/mlpol/286845 →
Anonymous
No.149223
149229 149233
>>149219
Then, how do they explain all the underwater cave paintings? Or the fossilized remains of giant floral and lizards?
Anonymous
No.149226
>>149219
>Club of rome
And how do the jews fit in?
Anonymous
No.149229
149238
>>149223
You are being dishonest. Glacial and warm periods extend for thousands of years and are not related the the globalist hoax. Warming is so real as the coronavirus hoax.
Lurk moar faggot: >>>/mlpol/302668 →
Anonymous
No.149233
>>149223
/mlpol/ is always right, nigger.
Anonymous
No.149238
149239 149242
>>149229
>Glacial and warm periods extend for thousands of years
Then how did the planet not lose all it's water thousands of years ago when the glaciers were melted?
Anonymous
No.149239
149240
>>149238
I think you have a theory.
By all means, let us hear it.
Anonymous
No.149240
149242
>>149239
Because the Earth is a sphere.
Anonymous
No.149242
>>149238
>>149240
Not sure what are you talking about but if the subject is huge volumes of water, then I would like to point to the big flooding narrated by many ancient civilizations, even the Bible mention it.
Anonymous
No.149243
149594 149598 149629 149649
06_01_008377_new-standard-map-of-the-world-by-buffalo-electrotype-and-engraving-co.jpg
>15 Nov 1892.
>From the Boston Library.
Notice the computational details on this patented navigational map, the patent is literally a mechanical computer for Worldwide Navigation.
File is 4773x6794 pixels, 31.4 MB.
Anonymous
No.149244
1538409036154.png
2419198__safe_imported+from+derpibooru_female_pony_oc_mare_oc+only_looking+at+you_absurd+resolution_filly_one+eye+closed_abstract+background_-fwslash.png
1597195291921.jpg
2394414swastika_checkmate.png
Well technically the Earth is an irregular ovoid.
But you see the truth is the Earth is more akin to the life generating symbol in pic 2 the windmills of friendship.
Anonymous
No.149245
antarct.jpeg
>2014
>Norwegian 'viking' won't pay Antarctica fine
>A self-proclaimed viking who sailed a yacht from Auckland to Antarctica without permission has been fined but refuses to pay.
>Norwegian authorities fined Jarle Andhoy 45,000 Norwegian kroner (NZ$8360) for violating environmental protection protocols in the Antarctic Treaty.
>If he doesn't pay he will be given a 50-day suspended jail sentence.
>Andhoy believed there was no obligation to report to sail on the open sea. He would not pay the fine, he said
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/10291142/Norwegian-viking-won-t-pay-Antarctica-fine
Anonymous
No.149246
72LVnhbytUHu_640x360.jpg
>Chemtrails vs. Curvature
>Scifidan has been feeling a little left out recently so here's a little video he can watch in his safe space....
https://www.bitchute.com/video/72LVnhbytUHu/
Mocking the sheeple.
Anonymous
No.149247
149248 149255
>falling for the flat earth psy-op
>not realizing the earth is actually hollow
Anonymous
No.149248
149253 149255
>>149247
The earth is hollow to store the botched metaphor for abortion on a kid's show
You know, The Cluster.
Anonymous
No.149253
149255
>>149248
I haven't a fucking clue what you mean or what show this is. But the earth is hollow, you just have to know where the entrances are.
Anonymous
No.149255
149259
Cubic Earth.jpg
>>149247
>>149248
>>149253
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.149259
149265
>>149255
Cubes can be hollow.
Checkmate retard
Anonymous
No.149265
158836
Equestria is Flat.png
VUwBBVD.jpg
Limestone - Upset.png
>>149259
Try to debunk this.
Anonymous
No.149266
149267
The people who call us crazy.jpg

Anonymous
No.149267
74mbjb5.jpg
85751870.jpg
meanwhile_in_australia.jpg
me-cracks-a-joke-about-things-being-upside-down-in-australia-55417266.png
snb113rg63941.jpg
>>149266
Anonymous
No.149275
File (hide): C2649B643807EC85593698A2AC8B8506-5924999.mp4 (5.7 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:54, llo564848481EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
llo564848481EDIT.mp4
>Dollar Vigilante
>NASA lies and the shape of Earth.
Anonymous
No.149281
FE-Art.jpg

Anonymous
No.149357
File (hide): DF317F54EEBDB4BF05A90D6B569BD078-10551276.webm (10.1 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:43, Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH.webm) [play once] [loop]
Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH.webm
Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH?
>We are NOT the Flat Earth Society. The Flat Earth Society is Govern-Ment mind control.
>We live in a world of lies pushed on us by the upper levels of the world controllers. It is easier to lie to someone than to convince them they have been lied to especially when they are unknowingly addicted to the fear. If the FOUNDATION of your world belief is that you are on a spinning water globe pear rocket flying through an infinite space vacuum, then you will not know WHO you are, WHERE you are and WHAT you truly are. You will be lost and feel insignificant not KNOWING that you are at the center of creation rather than on a speck of dust in an ever expanding universe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99fWjLYnT2Y
Anonymous
No.149543
File (hide): E9D5F7E0F9B68EC28C03252BE061DF45-2754881.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:360x360 Length:00:00:56, flat earth - the ground doesn't move.mp4) [play once] [loop]
flat earth - the ground doesn't move.mp4
Flat Earth - The Ground Doesn't Move.
Anonymous
No.149561
917468_909371065779325_1607452567_n.jpg
1468644_475373942662345_4170037771692388836_n.jpg
3002088c98c3f160b6ae9ffea2f59a27.jpg
10399998_814688535276377_8587554492356579603_n.jpg
11952842_10200781045126000_2346973169323563268_o.jpg

Anonymous
No.149565
File (hide): 7D7D1D9C5E530FB2A85E48B42901B266-1903512.mp4 (1.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:27, Impressive footage from Amazon studios.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Impressive footage from Amazon studios.mp4
>A kike in space
Impressive footage from Amazon studios.
Anonymous
No.149567
149592 149594
This-wont-change-the-fact-that-the-earth-is-still-flat.jpg

Anonymous
No.149592
>>149567
Yeah, OP explain this please.
Anonymous
No.149594
149595
transformation-Mercator-navigation-projection.gif
1446.png
>>149567
>according to flat earthers
That's an obvious lie.
FYI, the map used by most military during World War 2 was very similar to >>149243
The modern maps are Mercator projections meant to match the round Earth lie.
Anonymous
No.149595
149596
>>149594
The map you're referring to is a round earth map.
Anonymous
No.149596
149597
2515.png
>>149595
Look again.
Anonymous
No.149597
149598
>>149596
It contracts at the pole to represent the roundness of the earth.
What are you sourcing to imply that this map is a flat-earth model used for WWII?
Anonymous
No.149598
149599 149600
>>149597
Let get some things straight, until WW2 schools were teaching the Earth was flat, then the concept of a "planet" and the theory of gravitation was introduced the the mass population as facts. The hoax of space and spacial travel also was deployed to solidify that false belief.
And going back to the map of >>149243 you might consider it as a official Flat Earth map because it was used as such.
Anonymous
No.149599
149601
>>149598
>until WW2 schools were teaching the Earth was flat, then the concept of a "planet" and the theory of gravitation was introduced the the mass population as facts.
What are you sourcing this from? Where did you hear this?
Anonymous
No.149600
156620
>>149598
>The hoax of space and spacial travel also was deployed to solidify that false belief.
What about satellites? You can see them in the sky if you're in an area with no light pollution.
Anonymous
No.149601
149602 149617
>>149599
>Where did you hear this?
A woman born in 1920 America. I'll post her testimony as soon as find the clip.
Anonymous
No.149602
149603
>>149601
I had a grandparent who was in WWII. He never mentioned anything like this.
Anonymous
No.149603
149604 149606 149610
>>149602
>He never mentioned anything like this.
Very possible because the concept of planets and space travel were narrowed to academia and science fiction authors like Julius Verne.
Anonymous
No.149604
149607
>>149603
You're saying he was brainwashed?
Anonymous
No.149606
149609
>>149603
>concept of planets
Mars and Venus are visible from the surface of the Earth. To what capacity are you saying planets don't exist?
Anonymous
No.149607
149608
>>149604
Not at all, I'm saying that common people at that time hadn't TV to make them believe baloney.
Anonymous
No.149608
149610
>>149607
References to a round earth in science and literature date back long before TVs were invented.
When did this supposed conspiracy start, and how did they get the entire world on board? Wouldn't other countries, especially those at odds with one another, just point it out to embarrass their foes?
Anonymous
No.149609
149611
>>149606
When you use a telescope planets are not balls, but a luminescent objects roaming the sky. They were called errand stars for a reason.
Anonymous
No.149610
>>149608
>References to a round earth in science and literature date back long before TVs were invented.
I agree. I mentioned it at >>149603
Anonymous
No.149611
149612
>>149609
If you use a much more powerful telescope, they look like rocky spheres.
Anonymous
No.149612
149613
>>149611
I'll post the clips later.
Planets according NASA's CGI, versus reality.
Anonymous
No.149613
149614
>>149612
Round Earth pre-dates NASA by quite a bit.
When is the conspiracy supposed to have started?
Anonymous
No.149614
149615 149627 149639
>>149613
>When is the conspiracy supposed to have started?
When the Freemasons re-introduced heliocentrism at the time of Illuminism and the Renaissance.
Italian Galileo Galilei ring a bell?
Anonymous
No.149615
>>149614
I am aware of him, yes.
Anonymous
No.149617
hqdefault.jpg
hqdefault2.jpg
>>149601
>A woman born in 1920 America. I'll post her testimony as soon as find the clip.
I found the clip. Go to timestamp 2:22 for the lady's redpill; she was born in 1918.

>Ruth, 102 YEARS OLD. Pre interview clip
>I was taught the earth is flat!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP4pZJ1Szvw
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/102-year-old-ruth-was-taught-the-earth:f

Another of her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K87w1B019s
Anonymous
No.149622
149623 149630 150415
5257.png
>A Stranger's Guide to Flat Earth: 21 Questions and Answers Proving The Earth Is Flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZkGY1Pa8_E
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/21-Questions-and-Answers-Proving-The-Earth-Is-Flat:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/595frYc2yTug/

Content:

Question 01 - 00:15 - Where is the edge?
Question 02 - 04:02 - Where does the Sun go if the Earth is flat?
Question 03 - 05:30 - What's underneath the Flat Earth?
Question 04 - 07:06 - What about ships & boats disappearing over the horizon?
Question 05 - 08:19 - What about all the pictures of the Earth?
Question 06 - 11:01 - Why are all the other planets round?
Question 07 - 12:30 - What about satellites & GPS?
Question 08 - 14:00 - Is outer space even real?
Question 09 - 17:36 - How is circumnavigation possible on a Flat Earth?
Question 10 - 18:23 - How come the Moon is upside down in the southern hemisphere?
Question 11 - 19:14 - What about seasons?
Question 12 - 20:09 - What about gravity?
Question 13 - 22:02 - What about the Coriolis effect?
Question 14 - 23:17 - Why can't I see infinitely far?
Question 15 - 24:10 - Is the Flat Earth a religious thing?
Question 16 - 25:24 - Is The Flat Earth Society behind the resurgence of the Flat Earth?
Question 17 - 26:59 - Are all scientists, pilots & members of government in on it?
Question 18 - 28:21 - NASA isn't the only space program. Are all the others in on it too?
Question 19 - 32:29 - Who is responsible for this deception?
Question 20 - 34:27 - Why the lie?
Question 21 - 36:43 - What's it mean if the Earth is flat?

Bonus content - 39:17 - Dear NASA, why are you lying?
Anonymous
No.149623
File (hide): BF0494089F1DC649D83201ED72E2C709-9878062.webm (9.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:58, rrr.webm) [play once] [loop]
rrr.webm
File (hide): A72BE234E07326A99EA6260DC3DBB6D5-2731795.webm (2.6 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:21, ttt.webm) [play once] [loop]
ttt.webm
>>149622
A couple of clips.
Anonymous
No.149627
>>149614
>Italian Galileo Galilei ring a bell?
The guy who was imprisoned because he refused to allow his work to be proof-read and declared that anyone who questioned his ideas was an idiot (Even to the point of mocking the then-current pope in his thesis)?
Anonymous
No.149629
158743
Columbus and Cook voyages according to Flat Earth.png
>>149243
You do realize how ridiculous that map looks when you actually analyze the voyages people committed in the past, right? For example, Captain Cook. He explored much of the Southern Hemisphere. Logically speaking, if the earth was flat, as that pictures describes, then he would have had to travel an insane amount of distance, spending innumerable years of his life trying to navigate it all. However, when one actually looks at his voyages, all of them lasted for three years. For reference, Columbus' second through fourth voyages all lasted around the same amount of time.
<So yu can see, Cook's voyages are in red, Columbus' are in blue
So, unless he was using a speedboat, how is it possible to travel around the edges of the Earth, in such a short amount of time?

Also, explain the arctic poles.
Anonymous
No.149630
149631
>>149622
>Question 02 - 04:02 - Where does the Sun go if the Earth is flat?
<It's all "perspective"
What about the month of complete night and sunlight that Northern and Southern regions experience every summer and winter?
>Question 14 - 23:17 - Why can't I see infinitely far?
<It's because your eyesight is shit and there's too much dust in the way
Okay, why doesn't someone set up a laser system to prove their theory, then? A simple laser pointer is capable of still being visible for 12 miles away. Why setup a system to see if what you're seeing with the zoom shots shown in this video are legit or mirages: >>148988
>Question 21 - 36:43 - What's it mean if the Earth is flat?
<[Starts going on a rant about fiat money, the NWO, and all the same bullshit that Neo-Libertarian conservatives have been repeating since Ron Paul made it cool]
Have ANY of you guys actually bothered to rewatch any of that shit from over a decade ago? Or, am I the only one who finds humor in how Alex Jones turned out to be the biggest source of controlled opposition?
Anonymous
No.149631
149633
>>149630
>Okay, why doesn't someone set up a laser system to prove their theory, then?
There are plenty of videos with lasers debunking the curvature.
Do the research faggot.
Anonymous
No.149632
4bbf98acceae208f434c57ace4365828.jpg
191-3.png
9651.png
964130.png
15073521_1153975034639598_9143357851300631580_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149633
149637
>>149631
Okay, link them
Anonymous
No.149634
972ddc34aa9a36983c8fedda6d90b7fe92bec5067dd2371503c32e36c64989d0_1.jpg
According to the ball lie and as it is stated at >>149168 , the Chicago skyline at a distance of 50 miles, should be hidden below 1,667 feet of curvature.
Anonymous
No.149637
149649
16.4-Mile Laser Test Confirms Earth is Flat.jpg
>>149633
The jewtube algorithm scrubbed them all, now only (((authoritative))) opinions are shown. However I managed to find a couple.

>Flat Earth | Laser Test Proves The Flat Earth - Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBhDFO4NMrw

>16.4-Mile Laser Test Confirms Earth is Flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KYfodwnHAI
Mirrors:
https://www.brighteon.com/31db2f7b-135d-4a76-8e7e-451db974db45
https://www.bitchute.com/video/h058DU2FSf7k/
Anonymous
No.149638
File (hide): DAAC125D5A80ED7FC0B025833663DDE2-7382390.webm (7.0 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:50, 85T.webm) [play once] [loop]
85T.webm
86.png

Anonymous
No.149639
162586
>>149614
>Muh Freemasons/Illuminati
>Galileo started it
People have been speculating about the Earth being round since the 5th century BC, when Pythagoras was still figuring out new number tricks. From there, the information spread and people were able to both astronomically and mathematically prove it from the third century AD all the way up to 1522, when Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano circumnavigated the Earth FORTY YEARS before Galileo was born. If you're going to spout garbage, at least make it conform to actual history and not just fit whatever your single-digit IQ remembers from your elementary school knowledge of the sciences.
Anonymous
No.149641
If the earth is flat why does the sun rise at one end of the horizion and set at the opposite end? shoudnt we see the sun and moon rotating in circles above us the entire time? Seems like a jewish trick to me
Anonymous
No.149647
Tesla - Quote.png
Tesla: "Earth is a Realm, it is not a planet".
Anonymous
No.149648
149649
LEVEL.jpg
File (hide): 666B828604A5F6F0E664565CDF3DAAB4-8978364.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:02:10, LEVEL (2021) (360p).mp4) [play once] [loop]
LEVEL (2021) (360p).mp4
LEVEL (2021) | First Flat Earth Documentary
>Are flat earthers insane? Are they delusional idiots, so convinced of the wrong belief that they all become very passionate truth seekers and activists that want nothing more than to spread their ideas for the benefit of all humanity?
>No. Flat earthers are you. They are me. They are everyone and just because some people are indoctrinated into the heliocentric model of earth from a young age and still have a hard time letting go because of it, doesn't mean that those of us that know the truth about this world are going to give up on them.
>They are family. Whether you know it or not, you and I are referred to as "useless eaters" in the eyes of the self proclaimed leaders of the world.
>They wish to destroy us and the things we love in order to reduce the population to a more desirable number that's easier to steer and control.
>We must unite before it's too late and stand our ground if we have any chance at a future without one world totalitarian rule.
>We are taught that the earth is a cosmic accident and that life is meaningless because it's the only way to continually use us as batteries to power their economy, which is the real life matrix.
>If we all knew the truth about where we are and where we come from, their would be a revolt overnight and the government that you know today would not exist in the morning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXU10zS1zFk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@ODDTV:b/level-(2021)-first-flat-earth:6
https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/level-a-flat-earth-film-2021_993zULRmPWdZzry.html
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=4HM5W1AW5KHN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4SiTwJSONQk9/
Anonymous
No.149649
149650
>>149637
Hold up a second!
If the Earth is flat according to the according to the picture displayed here: >>149243
Wouldn't that result in the laser being to the right or left of the viewer? They cannot look at it straight on because, for example, if one were to look directly West along a latitudinal degree, everything would curve around to the right (With the reverse if you're facing East). Basically, imagine the Earth like a giant merry-go-round. The only exception to this would be if they were looking at it from a longitudinal angle, which would remain a straight line.
<But that doesn't explain how they can still see the laser.
Because light bends: https://archive.ph/zFuJY
With one of the reasons being gravity: https://archive.ph/tfho5

>>149648
>>We are taught that the earth is a cosmic accident and that life is meaningless because it's the only way to continually use us as batteries to power their economy, which is the real life matrix.
How is it possible for me to be a creationist, yet even acknowledge that sounds insane?
Anonymous
No.149650
149659
disapproval, my little pony - twilight sparkle.png
>>149649
>Because light bends: https://archive.ph/zFuJY
>links to a diffraction article
Diffraction is diffusion, not bending.
It might be said that light bends when "refraction" is the phenomena, see >>149110

>With one of the reasons being gravity: https://archive.ph/tfho5
>according to (((Einstein)))
It is a "THEORY", aka speculation, aka a hypothesis.

>How is it possible for me to be a creationist, yet even acknowledge that sounds insane?
It is an obvious analogy.
Anonymous
No.149658
FLAT EARTH CULT MEMBERS COME DEBATE ME (IS THERE ANY AMONG YOU THAT IS NOT A COWARD).mp4
>FLAT EARTH CULT MEMBERS COME DEBATE ME (IS THERE ANY AMONG YOU THAT IS NOT A COWARD)
Here it is shown the wrong approach to the subject. It is not about the biggest dick, but the soundest science.
Anonymous
No.149659
>>149650
>It might be said that light bends when "refraction" is the phenomena
Actually it is not bending, but bouncing.
Anonymous
No.149688
149775
Flat Earth mentioned and explained in animatic series.mp4
>For kids
>Flat Earth mentioned and explained in animatic series
https://t.me/flacheerdegemeinschaft/5936
Anonymous
No.149734
1141.png
>Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms
>Rather than genuinely inquire and research the proofs/evidence against the spinning globe model and for the stationary plane Earth, many people instead employ a variety of unconscious defense mechanisms to protect them from ever learning anything new.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn9utRKNwhs
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Anti-Flat-Earth-Defense-Mechanisms:4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D7Ot1oqaqVj3/
Anonymous
No.149775
149789 149870
File (hide): 8B9D675A156B15CD143C2BE6088DDBEE-26298954.mp4 (25.1 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:41, Modern cartoons.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Modern cartoons.mp4
>>149688
Anonymous
No.149789
55.png
>>149775
Anonymous
No.149869
Flat Earth WINNING...May Get As Big as Climate Change and Vaccines....mp4
>American government TV
>Scientists are worried that Flat Earth may become a political issue
Anonymous
No.149870
149871
>>149775
Shows like this should be illegal.
Anonymous
No.149871
149873
>>149870
imagine a world where Standards And Practices has to erase all degeneracy from children's media
and govt funded art grants can only go to art that fits criteria intended to weed out degeneracy
Anonymous
No.149873
149878
>>149871
Jews would abuse such legislation to stomp out opposition and "problematic" content.
You'd need to erase Jews before you did that. Jews are the reason why we can't have nice things.
Anonymous
No.149878
>>149873
>Jews are the reason why we can't have nice things.
Pretty much this.
Anonymous
No.149879
149962 149963
0de15b1404f0b61abb1c9b64298cb74d223bb15aa1241aed0477877711d79cf7_1.jpg
24a969087c25975c00835a7ef83244ed.jpg
14890562_2134649686759683_5234146108156457705_o.jpg
EBNs7eGWkAkdWlC.jpg
unnamed.jpg

Anonymous
No.149961
Go2MJKr5bUZc_640x360.jpg
3550.png
>The Fall of Gravity
>The Fall of Gravity presentation is a collaboration between University of California Davis Electrical Engineer Vahid Ebrahimi and Head of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/The-Fall-of-Gravity:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Go2MJKr5bUZc/
Anonymous
No.149962
162586
>>149879
>image 1
it makes a claim and then doesn't even try to back it up. Discarded.
>image 2
the solar system exists on a plane for the same reason that every planet except Uranus (long story) generally spins on the same axis, and that's because everything aside from the sun started off as a protoplanetary disk, something that has been observed elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy and subsequently confirmed as of 2018, and thus seems the most likely origin of our solar system. If you want to know what a protoplanetary disk is, then look it up because there are many people who can explain them better than I can.
>image 3
I looked this one up because I was legitimately interested. Anyway, Sir Ranulph Fiennes and his world record for doing so would like a word, alongside the others who undertook the same race back in the 1970s/80s.
>image 4
Photoshop exists. Enough said.
>image 5
Do you see that little thing down there in the bottom right in the map? It's to show you roughly how far it is from point A to point B on there by giving some rough distance estimates.
Do you see how it has sets of lines and numbers, all differing in respective meaning in relation to the map? That's because the map has inaccuracies just like any other projection that has ever been put into use. The projection most commonly used as the flat version of Earth by people in your sphere happens to have the inaccuracy or "warp" as it is more formally referred of splaying out as it goes further south in order to maintain the polar-centric circular projection. Thus, the corrections need to be made for proper calculations of distance. Now, if this was the real state of the Earth, then why would those corrections need to be made at all? Why wouldn't there just be one line with one set of numbers for the entire map? >muh different units of measurement! No, that doesn't work. There are 14 separate lines, each with their own different meanings. There are only 2 units big enough and widely used enough to matter on a worldwide scale, the mile and the kilometer (imperial and metric.) Even assuming each of those lines is some different way of measuring distances within those two systems, that only adds up to 11 separate units (4 imperial, 7 metric,) requiring us to somehow pull 3 more units of length out of our asses to accommodate the other three lines shown. Anyone who knows these things better than me can feel free to correct any mistakes I've made, and anyone who thinks I'm wrong on any of these points is free to challenge me. I welcome the idea of learning new things, so I may be convinced if a more convincing argument than facebook-tier images are given.
Anonymous
No.149963
149964 149969
>>149879
I really love how this thread is so full of completely un-cited claims that do nothing to help me consider the alternative point of view even after I give it the benefit of the doubt.
Anonymous
No.149964
149965
1.png
>>149963
>un-cited claims
You may begin with the lie that there is a curve behind the horizon. This thread shows plenty of empirical evidence debunking the curvature.
Anonymous
No.149965
157892
>>149964
I'm saying that all these memes that make claims with no sources aren't helping.
Anonymous
No.149966
Former Senior Officer in the CIA says NASA is Not a Space Agency.mp4
Former Senior Officer in the CIA says NASA is Not a Space Agency.
Verbatim.
Anonymous
No.149969
149971 149972
>>149963
so many claims, so little sources, and so far out of the two- now three- posts I've made here nobody's been able (or at least willing) to prove me wrong. I'd love for that to happen, but something tells me that the guy's just not able to.
Anonymous
No.149970
dc8a30e8430272a124448def4d20aac7.jpg

Anonymous
No.149971
64ba7fac.jpg
>>149969
>nobody's been able (or at least willing) to prove me wrong
And your sources are... NASA?
Anonymous
No.149972
149974 149975
1406901905191.png
6219465.png
>>149969
That's the simplicity of it. They want you to indoctrinate yourself to it to yourself.
They'll always maintain their aloofness from hard truth. That's why flat earth memes are rarely good of they are it's usually due to their failure.
The kinds of tactics are like a very familiar slime when squeezed. Not even a good kind that has a little bit of something. Because of the substanceless usually displayed corrodes anything of value. Which is why they pair it with many important topics with actual documented seriousness.
It can be explained with nuts.
Mine and others have the seed to germinate life extremely successfullyfilled with nutrition for the journey.
Theirs is completely dry to such a degree that they do it because of fear. Then they goad people into making a soggy waffle so they get to eat it. As they taste the life force as a whore supping on a fapichino they are watched because they have the same reactions every time, to determine the categorization of both the ideas and the effectiveness of which it can change a deadend husk.
That's the most scary part for these watchers.
This is their test bed to see if it is possible and how much it is. Along the way they drag immigrant issues through the mud by meer association, intentionally or not.
The best part of this is breaking the mental scaffold that replicates this is a testament to selfbrain washing. As such the solutions are viable.
It gets even better though because now a man can act on his own if he so dares to venture into his mind. A call to action made by himself to himself.
:plot: :jar:
Anonymous
No.149973
149976
smirk-vector-1.png
Well, if some round earther may explain why the famous curvature fails to show up in every experiment done, then your credibility might increase.
Anonymous
No.149974
162586
>>149972
Now that you mention it, I too notice a certain (((resemblance))) in the argument styles used by these types. They never even look at the ideas and points you make, content to continue arguing circles and making you look stupid by association while giving those of feeble mind the misplaced confidence to hold fast to their incorrect assumptions. Very familiar indeed.
Anonymous
No.149975
>>149972
>They want you to indoctrinate yourself to it to yourself.
At least Jews put some effort into their propaganda.
This is like trying to get a commie to explain how communism works and they just shout "do your own research!".
Ffs, I try to keep an open mind, but it's really annoying when all I get in return for considering someone else's viewpoints is half-baked memes and unsourced claims.
Anonymous
No.149976
149978
>>149973
>explain why the famous curvature fails to show up in every experiment done
[Citation needed]
Anonymous
No.149978
149979
mane-six-mlp.png
>>149976
>[Citation needed]
Read the thread anon.
The citation you ask is in the physics books.
Anonymous
No.149979
149985
>>149978
I have read this thread, and it's almost nothing but loose ends with no source.
Anonymous
No.149985
Pony - blind.png
>>149979
If you say so.
Anonymous
No.150022
150023 150025
85260298.png
85260300.png
85260299.png
85260303.jpg
85260304.jpg

Anonymous
No.150023
150024
>>150022
>Pic 5
Gravity and magnitsm.
Anonymous
No.150024
>>150023
Wtf the air cant be magnetic it's not metal like my fridge magnets
Anonymous
No.150025
150026
>>150022
>implying the border between the atmosphere and space is a sheer border
The air gets thinner with higher elevation. That's why high altitude locations have less oxygen. As you go higher, the air gets thinner and thinner until there is no air at all, which would be a vacuum.
Anonymous
No.150026
150027 150030
>>150025
Building on your point, space isn't a perfect vacuum either. Near to the sun as we are, there are actually a rather large number of particles flying around through our general vicinity due to factors like leftover particles from the birth of the solar system and even particles radiating off of the sun itself through solar wind and such. Space outside our solar system isn't a perfect vacuum either, but it's certainly more empty than space near the sun.
Anonymous
No.150027
150030
>>150026
Yeah, space is not a perfect vacuum at all.
Vacuum is by definition relative.
Anonymous
No.150030
85260331.jpg
>>150026
>>150027
>space
C'mon.
Anonymous
No.150031
150034 150037 150073
maxresdefault.jpg
135.png
>The nail in the coffin of the heliononsensical model. By: Owen Benjamin
>Owen has completed his journey from not ever looking and just believing to having looked and now knowing that the heliononsensical model in impossiBALL.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqp4SJksTlQ
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/the-nail-in-the-coffin-of-the:9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qqp4SJksTlQ/
I hope anons already understand the concept of acceleration and inertia.
Anonymous
No.150034
150073
>>150031
Owen Benjamin literally drinks turpentine to cure his gay thoughts. He’s a literal Retarded faggot. I wouldn’t want him parroting anything I believe
Anonymous
No.150037
150042 150065 150073 150093
>>150031
The earth doesn't rotate around the sun and the sun doesn't rotate around the earth.
Everything rotates around one unknown thing at the center of the universe.
My money's on a fucking big sun. The biggest one imaginable.
We're dust compared to our sun.
And our sun would be dust compared to that sun.
So when you think about it...
Thinking of earth as the center of the universe everything else rotates around is nicer than pretending our sun's more important than any other.
Anonymous
No.150042
150054
d521.gif
>>150037
>sun worshipper
Anonymous
No.150054
150062
>>150042
Who said anything about worship?
Anonymous
No.150062
150073
>>150054
Don't you just love when a faggot personally attacks you for a bullshit reason while completely ignoring what you have to say?
It means you win.
I am right. To say the earth revolves around the sun is an oversimplification at best and entirely false in actuality.
It really is a matter of perspective.
Sunsimps only hate the "we earthlings are the center of the universe"chads for having self-esteem.
Anonymous
No.150065
>>150037
>Everything rotates around one unknown thing at the center of the universe.
Galaxies are centered around black holes. Perhaps there really is a supermassive back hole at the center of our universe.
Anonymous
No.150073
150079 150145
05534fbfbd0dd73a8c5bcf331d946e9e579b189ffc0dc915dcb2f3196ebe603a.jpg
>>150062
>Don't you just love when a faggot personally attacks you for a bullshit reason while completely ignoring what you have to say?
That is exactly what happened with >>150031
Answers >>150034 and >>150037 evaded completely the physics facts. Science, specifically physics, it is what is being judged.
You cannot ask for to entertain your derailing answers.
Anonymous
No.150079
>>150073
>Science, specifically physics, it is what is being judged.
Correction:
It is not science per se what is being judged, but its priests and their lies. Scientists were and are corrupting science to make it fit an agenda.
Anonymous
No.150093
150133 150136
>>150037
I mean, technically the Earth is the center of the observable universe, so everything that matters to our species is quite literally centered around this blue-green marble we call home.
Anonymous
No.150133
>>150093
Sunfags on susicide watch
they literally don't even earn the word suicide. They earn a stupid unfunny amogus reference.
Anonymous
No.150136
150149
>>150093
>I mean, technically the Earth is the center of the observable universe
I would like to mention that if there is not ball, then there is not space or universe. But a firmament and stars.
Anonymous
No.150145
>>150073
Cry all you want it’s not gonna stop your boy Owen from being a closeted homosexual who takes advantage of his fans.
Anonymous
No.150149
150159
>>150136
The "universe" it totality. The metaphysics of it don't matter. Whether they're fixed stars or in space it's all part of the universe.
Anonymous
No.150159
150317
>>150149
If motion requires something else to compare it to, is the universe technically moving?
Anonymous
No.150169
maxresdefault.jpg
>k-Rock 95.5 Australia - Flat Earth is ridiculous!
>Do you want the red pill or the blue pill? The choice is yours. If you want to know the truth about our flat world, watch these videos in order and there will be no turning back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGpUqX8DD9w
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/k-rock-95.5-australia-flat-earth-is:5
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ohC3cpRhKurI/
Anonymous
No.150195
627.png
File (hide): 99D0067EFB5E1EF3E2AD2B8487E42E2A-9960053.mp4 (9.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:58, Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt.mp4
>Obviously It's Fake - Podcast on Flat Earth (1:10:27 long)
>Banned on Youtube
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Zu3KrZ2y7r4v/

There is an excerpt showing the normie reaction of the stream hostesses after the stream ended. It's priceless imho.
I attach it here. (4:58 long)
>Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/flat-earth-obviously-it's-fake-excerpt:9?
Anonymous
No.150294
150317 151693 160515
1354.png
89156.jpeg
Private Rocket Hits The Dome at 73 Miles Up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVIVfoJ2Yh4
Anonymous
No.150317
150319
File (hide): C24E79BBDDC8B144FD15792F9CACE50B-3215375.mp4 (3.1 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:10, Slow Motion Shotgun.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Slow Motion Shotgun.mp4
>>150159
That's the theory. The Earth turns on it's axis, the moon orbits the Earth, the Earth orbits the sun, the sun is one of millions of stars that is orbiting the black hole that creates the Milky Way, and everything is slowing moving itself apart from one another.

>>150294
>Rocket Hits The Dome
Wouldn't that cause it to explode? Or immediately bounce back?
<Also, slow motion video is a thing.
Anonymous
No.150319
Screenshot_20210811_004737.png
Screenshot_20210811_004758.png
>>150317
>Wouldn't that cause it to explode? Or immediately bounce back?
It looks like the rocket got caught in some kind of force field. Even if somebody may claim that the rocket exhausted its propulsion and fell, that very fast spin was stopped on the spot.
I'm posting 2 screenshots showing that the rocket's camera is using an eye fish lens. That's the reason why the horizon switches between concave and convex.
Another video:

>Unedited Footage of 2014 Go Fast Rocket (full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAuu-Zg9ejw
Anonymous
No.150329
This is the map used in all planes with an Auto Pilot.mp4
Map and airplanes.
Anonymous
No.150392
150393 153844
Challenge for flatfags https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
Anonymous
No.150393
150402 150408 150409
maxresdefault.jpg
t4wtc.jpg
>>150392
>10 Challenges For Flat Earthers
Accepted.

- 10 Flat Earth challenges completed - Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXUlIF7bNXinjYvrS3BcWaoan5yeAFez0

- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 1 - Maps)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmbSqgzpyqo
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 2 - Antarctica & Sunlight)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLBMxnwrkC8
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 3 - Eclipses & Predictions)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhtzhWZiLrU
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 4 - We See Too Far Dave)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMAoJqMAN8A
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 5 - Boats "Over The Curve"?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erUKDM7Cmxo
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 7-8 - Dave Wants Balloon Footage & Eclipse Review)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPH9QXLkJsU
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 9-10 | Flights And "Something Scientific"}
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htkuWUOqI4I
Anonymous
No.150402
>>150393
Thanks bro
Anonymous
No.150408
150409 150413
>>150393
Quick question, why are each of these videos two hours long in order to "dispute" a video that's 12 minutes long, with each video spending entire sections wasting people's time with useless information that doesn't answer the question being presented, doesn't link to the original videos being used, and some of the sourced channels in questioned being terminated by the author themselves?
In other words, why is there no actually answer to the question, and instead just some drawn out statements that fall into the same fallacies that were pointed out in the original challenge video?
Anonymous
No.150409
150410
5cb.jpg
>>150393
>>150408
To put it another way, GET TO THE FUCKING POINT!
Anonymous
No.150410
7b.png
>>150409
>GET TO THE FUCKING POINT!
Sure. Our realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.150413
150414
86ab.png
>>150408
>In other words, why is there no actually answer to the question
I agree those videos are way too long and try to explain too much.
I believe the creator's intention is to educate the average person without a physics background.
The Flat Earth subject must dive in mathematics, physics and many other hard science branches in order to debunk lies and fake science. Obviously this is not the preferred flavor of most people because they lack the very foundations to grasp the concept, so an entertainment approach usually is chosen.
Anonymous
No.150414
150415
>>150413
>I agree those videos are way too long and try to explain too much.
They don't explain shit. What does the length of the coastline have to do with traveling from New Zealand to Chile? Why do none of them attempt to disprove the curvature of the Earth buy doing their test from any of the plains like the Utah Salt Flats like the guy insisted? Why do none of the videos directly say, "This is the reason why, and now I will explain how that works"?
Anonymous
No.150415
150416
54732f6a1beeec18ed457e501040c30b6b43d9738ec246f18d81063b46f5fddd.png
>>150414
>"This is the reason why, and now I will explain how that works"?
No problem.
If you are indeed hungry for knowledge and according to you, you despise to waste time, you should see >>148884
>>148885 and perhaps >>149622
Anonymous
No.150416
150417
>>150415
>If you are indeed hungry for knowledge
THAT IS NOT WHAT I ASKED FOR.
What I asked for is for you to explain, in simple detail, why it is that the so-called challenges proposed in are "easily" disproven. Videos that are hours on end and documents that hundreds of pages log or make fallacies claims that do explain anything to do not make an argument nor are constituted as "knowledge".

Actually take the time to explain and refute shit. There's more than enough posts in this thread already asking questions that have been outright ignored.
Anonymous
No.150417
150418
eef3.png
>>150416
Oh, I see.
Basically you are demanding spoon feeding without any research whatsoever on your side.
Anonymous
No.150418
150419
>>150417
You're the ones making the claims that the Earth is flat. Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to explain why those claims are false. That includes answering any question people have, despite how stupid they may be.
Anonymous
No.150419
150420
9ba.png
>>150418
>Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to explain why those claims are false.
You mean that the claims are true, anon.
I'm posting the claims and I back them up with proof.
If (you) can't or don't want to understand the stream of devastating facts, then I suggest you read and watch them again.
I can't be responsible for your failure.
Anonymous
No.150420
150422
>>150419
>I refuse to explain jack
Then we have nothing left to discuss.
Anonymous
No.150422
150425
69849ce2968cbb7ead160e87bc7b05a3cfabc3f77c5ff8f028f853608f109048.png
>>150420
You don't want to discuss, but to trap your opponent. In other words, you are not after the truth, but to prove I'm wrong to make you feel better.
What about if you make the research and demonstrate that Earth is a ball. By the way, the argument that because NASA says so doesn't count.
I would love you could back your religion up with facts.
Anonymous
No.150423
>>148613
Earth is shaping like potato chip.
Anonymous
No.150425
220956.gif
>>150422
Good job, be the establishment figureheads by imitating smug SJWs proud of their new gender theory.
Really excellent work.
Would you like a cookie too?
That people would spend the time of day doing time consuming experiments that require a precision, accuracy and dedication to actually get consistent data. And then analyze for the fun of looking at the numbers.
Or they just sort of shrug say who gives a fuck and move on?
Go ahead do what you're doing that's what some of your vocal video members do. They could be right, they could be wrong.
But that didn't matter because if you actually wanted to prove your point it's all a matter of propaganda and information delivery.
You are terrible there.
The very first thing people ask is why should I care.
>Cause governments are lying!
Okay, we know that what else.
>Earth is flat! Mean you been lied to!
Okay, lots of people already do that.
How is it important for me to know this?
>...
When I could use the really big lie, and get good enough. We do that anyway so what's the big deal?
>. . .
>Truth
But does it help me? Can I actually use it to my advantage and have something critical from it for later use?
>. . .
Okay, I'm not going to waste my precious time on this then, good bye.
>
>WHY IS NOBODY SEEKING OUT THE TRUTH!?
>AHHHHHHHHHH?!
Anonymous
No.150481
150482
44146.png
Flat-Earther Destroys Globe in Live Radio Interview_EDIT.mp4
>Flat-Earther Destroys Globe in Live Radio Interview
>Re-Mastered version of the ground-breaking interview where President of the International Flat Earth Research Society exposes and explains the globe hoax to Coast 2 Coast AM radio co-host
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Flat-Earther-Destroys-Globe-in-Live-Radio-Interview:d
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4ruLflqsyK7Y/
Anonymous
No.150482
150483
1336614f_grin.gif
>>150481
So that's all. No one knows why just believe us.
>If Globe spirituality is ded
>If Flat spiritually is not ded
<Black budget for something else
<Gravity their god
That's fucking retarded.
Because what do you do with that information afterwards.

Well you answered my question so here's a pony. Good job.
Anonymous
No.150483
150484 150485
4753.png
>>150482
>So that's all. No one knows why just believe us.
You are gaslighting.
Stick to the facts. There's not any demonstrable curve, therefore there is not ball. So simple, so straight forward.
Anonymous
No.150484
2362988__safe_anonymous+artist_princess+cadance_alicorn_pony_4chan_breaking+news_car_george+floyd_george+floyd+protests_meme_minneapolis_minneapolis+riots_parod.png
>>150483
>No one knows why they go about spreading Global propaganda
>It's a fucking mystery
>If Globe spirituality is ded
>If Flat spiritually is not ded
<Black budget for something else
<Gravity their god

That's what your video claimed.
Anonymous
No.150485
>>150483
Gaslighting does not exist
Anonymous
No.150600
when-challenge-reality-force-them-research-conspiracy-theorist.jpeg

Anonymous
No.150601
150604
maxresdefault.jpg
k4.png
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein! (3:12:35 long)
>Today we take a look at what all mainstream scientism is based on by looking at Albert Einstein's Theories of Relativity.
>His 'theories' are the very definition of sophistry and we are going to show you why.
>We will be joined by our special guest Karen B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vybj6E9WE4

Mirror with video divided in 2 parts:
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein. P1 (1:32:00 long)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ng5BdyPdMug4/
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein. P2 (1:39:53 long)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QKAwet7lKzNK/
Anonymous
No.150604
Screenshot_20210821_050625.png
File (hide): 2A0B0AE2985E9174D3B74CF6B074EE4F-6590486.webm (6.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:31, EDIT.webm) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.webm
>>150601
Jump to around 1:18:10 for a funny moment.
You can't make this shit up.
Anonymous
No.150615
150616
Do any Flat Earthers have an explanation as to the following two questions:
>1. Why is it possible to see both the Sun and the Moon, in the same general direction, during the day?
>2. Why does the moon change colors and size?
Anonymous
No.150616
150618
>>150615
The moon doesn't change colours or size. It just appears to, because of moon clouds.
Sometimes clouds of space dust get in the way of our view of the moon.
Ever seen the moon blocked by a white cloud closer to us and our light source?
Ever seen the moon blocked by a black cloud far out of reach of our light source?
Anonymous
No.150618
150621
>>150616
>clouds of space dust
...WHAT? Has anyone considered the possibility that Flat Earthers are from the same brand of retards that brought us Otherkins: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=lFRjrLmc_4c
And Breatharians: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=WWRniMqhr00

Anonymous
No.150621
>>150618
You heard me, faggot. Do you deny the existence of space clouds?
Anonymous
No.150990
DvuCdqIWoAAbUsD.jpg

Anonymous
No.151017
C-XkkCIXoAATOJR.jpg
qlPDEF1.jpg
SlJ3MtW.jpg
XHb1dv2.jpg

Anonymous
No.151197
151503
489156.jpeg
056.png
>Smoking Gun Proof From NASA Software Engineers That Mars Rovers Are On Earth — Not On Mars
>Richard Hall — a British engineer who runs the website RichPlanet.net — has done a series of videos examining an increasing mountain of evidence suggesting serious chicanery involving these rovers on “Mars”. As they say, “a picture is worth a thousand words” — and those pictures allegedly coming back from Mars are being surreptitiously vetted long before the public — and even most NASA employees — get to see them.
>In Hall’s series “Where Are The Mars Rovers?” he discusses many of these anomalies with his fellow scientist Andrew Johnson. In Part 3 of that series, they discuss a lengthy anonymous essay posted on an astrophysicists blog written by a software engineer who had worked for NASA — and during a routine trouble-shooting job with the rover, discovered a “backdoor” in the Mars rover’s software that allowed NASA to receive thumbnail images from the rovers “on Mars” allegedly in real time — no time delay, but because of the immense distance between Earth and Mars — this would be a scientific impossibility — as radio transmission faster than the speed of light is an impossibility.
https://christiansfortruth.com/smoking-gun-proof-from-nasa-software-engineers-that-mars-rovers-are-on-earth-not-on-mars/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1tLS1IUnRQ
Anonymous
No.151503
151653
85260313.jpg
>>151197
Anonymous
No.151653
151657
2636038.png
>>151503
>NASA PHOTOSHOPPED THIS IMAGE!
<Literally just searching the text in the image reveals it's from a video tutorial on using photoshop, and has no actual connection to NASA.
In this thread we see the mortal predilection for mimicking the actions of their superiors, without comprehending those actions, nor even attempting to comprehend them.
Mortals have seen people claim that the establishment sometimes lies, and have some vague inkling that the establishment cosmology has foreboding implications. Thus the earth is "obviously" flat (because coming up with their own individual view is harder than just copying someone else's view), and those unsettling possibilities are rendered harmlessly false.
Mortals have also seen people post examples of doctored images to support their claim that someone is lying, so hey, here's a doctored image, it must support my claim!
In addition to searching the text, if one reverse images searches the red version of the picture, the only place it shows up red is in places where they're claiming it's proof of the mars landings being fake, and never shows up anywhere being claimed as a real photo of mars.
Any anon who's worked at a grocery store (or similar) will be familiar with another form of this mimicking behavior, where "people" grab food that's behind the stuff in front without knowing why real people do it. As such, those "people" often get products with the same exact expiration date as the product in front (and waste both their time and the stocker's time), or sometimes even get a worse expiration date if things happen to have been stocked improperly.
This mimicking is also why it is impossible to have a real discussion with a mortal, because they do not comprehend how an exchange of ideas and a resolution of differing opinions works, nor can they comprehend the idea of multiple different views being reasonable interpretations of the limited information and experiences available to the participants. They've just seen the general flow of "debates", and mimic the behavior of the "winning" side.

Remember anons, while it is very tempting to try and dissuade these unfortunate "souls" from their errant path, it is often a waste of time. Many such circumstances are such that anyone who can comprehend why the position is wrong, already won't believe it, and those who do believe it can't comprehend the reasons it's wrong. It's an example of the typical human behavior of assuming that everyone is relatively similar to oneself, which makes anons believe that surely this "person" simply hasn't encountered the alternative viewpoint, and is completely capable of understanding it. This belief is, sadly, often incorrect.
Anonymous
No.151657
>>151653
>Remember anons, while it is very tempting to try and dissuade these unfortunate "souls" from their errant path
So, may I know where is the curve?
Remember anon, if there is no curve, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
Where is the curve? Huh?
Anonymous
No.151658
Flat Earth; Antarctica - Dome Described in 1958 Encyclopedia and Prior Editions!.mp4
Flat Earth; Antarctica - Dome Described in 1958 Encyclopedia and Prior Editions!
Anonymous
No.151659
File (hide): 18F47444EAB9334A590EDB39ADED54BF-2693358.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:55, Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.mp4
Nikon P1000 - (2021).jpg
Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.
Anonymous
No.151660
C67wxRAWcAAkizB.jpg
CYX7-z1W8AMOWzG.jpg
EVTebVzXQAAXXh5.jpg
5681865f0b96a859481c14aefc488192.jpg
Smith Island with and without dome.jpg

Anonymous
No.151663
151682 151692
829ee75cebdea14af0b6cd407a1fdcd4562e9527f135b7d352a91a1757dff3fb.png
I stuck my head down the flat-earth rabbit-hole once. Just once. Now I can't unsee the fisheye lenses in space footage.

3/10 fun the first few times but now it's just depressing.
Anonymous
No.151682
>>151663
Fish eye lenses are used to maximize field of vision rather than focus on one particular spot. They tend to be used in space applications because you want to see as much of your space station or craft as possible.
Anonymous
No.151692
16ddf45676f4fa8326cd8fa19eed8e94.jpg
>>151663
>pic
Anonymous
No.151693
index.jpeg
>>150294
The video is gone.
Well, that was expected.
Anonymous
No.151694
EKz7PAsVAAEnM33.jpg

Anonymous
No.151702
>>149108
These memes reek of manipulation. Especially the last one. It should read “my face when”, not “your face when”. I don’t know if these are especially made by agencies paid to optimally stupidize the US population and accelerate their decline (to facilitate the Chinese taking over the Empire, for example), or whether it’s just how the egregore works, but this is suspicious.
Anonymous
No.151703
151830
>>149113
We do feel the centrifugal force of the Earth’s rotation. Its pull upwards is what makes your measured weight on the equator be about 300g less than your actual mass.
Anonymous
No.151810
151813
File (hide): 977E0931745B3C6B954CD6E505381AF6-9893165.mp4 (9.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:05:29, Eric Dubay Daylight Debunks The Globe.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Eric Dubay Daylight Debunks The Globe.mp4
Eric Dubay: Daylight Debunks The Globe.
https://t.me/FE_Nederland/550
Anonymous
No.151811
151812
Spoilered
>pic related is one of the things flat earthtards fear
Anonymous
No.151812
8451.png
>>151811
Do a Ctrl+F and search this thread for Nikon P900 and P1000, then THOSE ARE what round earthers really fear.
Anonymous
No.151813
tra.jpeg
35.png
>>151810
I found mirrors and transcript.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Daylight-Debunks-the-Globe:0
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cAXhB26Bx1ls/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mkrgeqFDQVpq/
Anonymous
No.151830
>>151703
>Earth’s rotation
I would love to hear from where you are taking your info.
Anonymous
No.152207
File (hide): 4B3A91DD1BCC5C81616C173A596764A4-1566182.mp4 (1.5 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:00, Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!.mp4
Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!
Anonymous
No.152214
maxresdefault.jpg
>Outer Space isn't a Place - It's a Lie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqzlQPlCv44
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lVWexiQzU43l/
Anonymous
No.152392
4158.png
4040.png
>Flat Earth: Spacex credibility disappears lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvRMQx6GQ_0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/H931aEbu1Cq8/
CGI fails.
Anonymous
No.152451
152453
The Earth can't possibly be flat because if it were all the cats in the world would have pushed everything and everyone over the edge by now!
Anonymous
No.152453
>>152451
Cats can't, the edge is 150 feet high.
Anonymous
No.152559
158157
maxresdefault.jpg
4755.png
5436.png
5630.png
>Is Theoretical Physics Actually Pseudo-Science? - (9:01 long)
>Michio Kaku and the pseudo-science that is modern-day 'theoretical physics.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhaegEh6Cg8
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BoIhdNLpzFMN/
Spoiler: It's a pile of crap that can't pass the scientific method test.
Anonymous
No.153052
File (hide): 7F6EABAFEC9675FB0EF5DA3A9CD029F6-1995410.mp4 (1.9 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:47, NASA LIES...AGAIN-1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
NASA LIES...AGAIN-1.mp4
NASA lies.
Anonymous
No.153075
maxresdefault.jpg
>TOP 10 Reasons Why I Don't Trust NASA
>This video shows enough evidence as to why you should no longer trust NASA or any other space agency and at the very least encourage you to DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eQxHPI86Nw
Anonymous
No.153076
flat earth 1.png
flat earth 2.png
flat earth 3.png
flat earth 4.png
flat earth 5.png

Anonymous
No.153082
215421.png
15455.png
15625.png
>Is Antarctica The Key To Flat Earth?
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=5db8b0422616150016b26a2d
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Flat-Earth-NASA-Op-Fish-Bowl-Perfectly-by-Greg-Reese-Plocha-Zeme-NASA-Op-Fish-Bowl-opet-Perfektne-od-Grega-Reese:b
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PhsioRlRJrQE/
Short, straight to the point, and well done.
Anonymous
No.153227
File (hide): 391B028294D2FBF982F5E4E14283FF47-4170805.mp4 (4.0 MB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:03:03, Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession!.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession!.mp4
Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession.
Moon landings are a fraud.
Anonymous
No.153248
File (hide): FF10DDF1894642FE5D73875CA096B2F4-2005859.webm (1.9 MB, Resolution:602x360 Length:00:00:51, Cartoon Truth.webm) [play once] [loop]
Cartoon Truth.webm
Cartoon Truth about the fake moon landing.
Anonymous
No.153839
153844
https://youtu.be/AQl8h7Aa75s
Anonymous
No.153844
153850
85260322.jpg
>>153839
Already posted. See >>150392
Anonymous
No.153847
153849
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/347942388

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/347946487
Anonymous
No.153849
85260318.jpg
>>153847
>CIA & international spying gossip
This has nothing to do with Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.153850
153851
>>153844
My apologies. Pleade allow timr for me to review the 'completion' vids.
While Im doing that, since youre familiar with the youtube channel, would you care to address the numerous additional videos that refute flat earth theory?
For clarification, the challenge is NOT to 'watch this guys whole videos and respond to everything', the challenge is to address the additional concerns, starting here:
https://youtu.be/KyD8VIK032o
And yes, this will be a sequence of inquiries. Im trying to skeptically weigh arguments from both sides. (You) are welcome to decline.
Anonymous
No.153851
153852 153853
82045e975.png
>>153850
If you can proof you live on a ball I will be satisfied.
Anonymous
No.153852
>>153851
You've rejected all of the proof given.
What would it actually take to prove it to you? What's your standard of evidence?
Anonymous
No.153853
153854 153903
>>153851
Well, lets be specific about what you feel constitutes proof.
Lets start with the moon.
Please explain the moon.
Anonymous
No.153854
153855 153899 153902
calculating.gif
>>153853
The parameters are set, according to Freemasons our realm is round, however real experiments (not CGI, photoshop and tall tales) debunk that.
So, applying real science, (((governments))) and their bought scientists' accounts don't hold water.
Interesting, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.153855
153856
>>153854
Okay, then what would hold water to you? What would it take?
Anonymous
No.153856
153858 154733 157951
this-experiment-is-an-example-of-hypothesis-based-science-3.jpg
>>153855
>what would hold water to you?
To pass the Scientific Method.
Please, research moar fren; your question denotes that you are ill prepared to understand how science works.
Anonymous
No.153858
153862
>>153856
What sort of research are you looking for?
Anonymous
No.153862
153899
>>153858
Not me, but you.
It is (you) who doesn't see the BS before your eyes because you are relying on faith in perceived "scientist priests" and government propaganda instead scientific analytical thinking.
Anonymous
No.153899
>>153862
>>153854
Very Arrogant, Very Cringe
Anonymous
No.153902
>>153854
I saaaaaaaid, explain the Moon
Anonymous
No.153903
153904 153944
aff46et56rtye54we.jpg
>>153853
This is getting tiresome. The whole thread is filled with proof.
Anonymous
No.153904
154733
>>153903
Youve got two statements about the moon landing, and what? Idgaf about the landings, I want you to explain what the fuck the moon is using flat earth and or dome theory.
Heres the rub. Your cutesy rhetorical 'proofs' dont measure up to a flat earth. I could conceive of the 'shard of a larger planet' theory, but the curvature of the planet is so easily proven through a variety of basic and complicated tests (and the results are repeatable and correspond to one another while operating individually), that to claim it is flat you would have to be quite ignorant, taking the piss, or you cant think rationally.
Since (you) are seemingly the only anon who gives this theory any weight Im addressing you.
Now then. You are aware that constellations are a thing, yes? Do you honestly think its some kind of projected or artifical aspect of a dome? If so, show me a astronomic chart by which you can track the movement of the constellations. If the flat earth were true, the constellations would be visible going NOT in a straight line, but would meander in order to be visible over the various areas it is claimed based on the flat earth map, and would diverge from the directional positions they are observed from.
Or, for simplicity's sake, explain the moon.
For extra credit, please use these charts to indicate when the next lunar eclipse is going to happen.
Because the funny thing about astronomical charts is you CAN accuratrly predict down to the minute (Im sure more sophisticated anons can be even more precise) when historical and future eclipses (not exclusively) will occurr.
Additionally theres this thing called tides, magnetic fields, as well as seasons, and all the rest. The thing about science is its based on findings rather than an individual's agreement with the theory for whatever reason. A scientist is tasked with trying to DISPROVE their pet theory and only after they exhaustively fail to do so do they present their findings to the critical analysis of other scientists, who then take it upon themselves to rigorously vet the experiments, the findings, and the validity of the theory.
The few videos of what has been posted that I HAVE watched are easily refuted and debunked (like the horizon laser experiment), so no Im not going to bother reading/watching everything. Back to the challenge:
Tl;dr Explain anything about the moon using flat earth models, and Ill be happy to show you how absurd those explanations are
Anonymous
No.153944
>>153903
>"Proofs"
Sure Buddy, BTW whats your IQ? Asking for a Friend.
Anonymous
No.154391
154734
Heliocentrism Modern Day Sun Worship Masquerading as a Science.mp4
Heliocentrism Modern Day Sun Worship Masquerading as a Science.
Anonymous
No.154733
162586
>>153856
>>153904
I don't really know if the earth is flat or not (as in I cannot prove either way), but I have to say that I don't really like your science, well maybe not woreship, but naive and idealistic view of the scientific world.

The reality is that we live in a world were egalitarinism is preached, which includes scientists that improve their careers to find "poofs" of this. Of course, there are those scientist that speak out about this but they are either shunned by the rest of the "scientific community" I'm sorry but I can't help but to think how community and objectivity seems, to me, naturally at odds with each other. Woman are liars and they are that way to fit in into communities. It seems clear that a society based around objectivity and truth would suffer from being mesh into one. or, it it's possible, removed from their former post.

Point is that I would put no faith in their integrity at all. They have lied before, so I shouldn't be suprized if they do so again.

This also doubles down in the favour of the flat earthers' camp. I haven't picked a side yet since it would only be for show anyway since I don't feel confident that I know enough about the issue to prove whatever conclusion I might reach but my point is that just like how flat earthers point to the idea that the earth is round; which, when you look at the horizon, is the most intuitive thought, the same can be said about bio essentialism. When we look at a nigger and compare him to a white man, the unbiased mind automatically assumes that just how their outside appearence is different so must their insides be. Obviously, ranging in degrees but that's the intuitive thought. But people have been made into liars because of the fear of being called racist. This forces them to claim that the emperor is nude.

I'm not saying that they are obviously the same but I'd liked to point out the similarity.
Anonymous
No.154734
>>154391
Just because the earth revolves around the sun doesn't mean that you have to worship the sun. That's nonsense.
Anonymous
No.155609
File (hide): 6CB3276771EE0A6444A0E46966205A45-550350.mp4 (537.5 KB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:18, nog.mp4) [play once] [loop]
nog.mp4

Anonymous
No.155626
155728
IMG_0085.PNG
After looking into OP claim the world is flat, I now believe the earth is definitely flat
Anonymous
No.155728
pinkie pie - welcome to the herd.png
>>155626
Welcome.
Anonymous
No.155834
File (hide): 65478800309277B5B82D11FB1E538C72-4771105.mp4 (4.6 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:12, How far is Arcturus.mp4) [play once] [loop]
How far is Arcturus.mp4
How far is Arcturus?
Anonymous
No.156620
156622 156630
This Is What A REAL Satellite REALLY Looks Like... No CGI Required.mp4
>>149600
>What about satellites?
Satellites are actually balloons.
Anonymous
No.156622
156624
>>156620
Be a good lad and calculate when the next solar or lunar eclipse will be, using a flat earth model
Anonymous
No.156624
156625
>>156622
No idea, but it is sufficient to know that there is no curve, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then... the whole astronomy building falls catastrophically. It is all a big hoax.
Anonymous
No.156625
156627
>>156624
And how do (you) know there is no curve? Are you any pf thes3 vodeographers who have condicted an experiment and can reproduce the results such that a knowledgeable person could observe the experiment without finding fault in it?
Anonymous
No.156626
Pssst, without evidence its not knowledge, its personal conviction.
Anonymous
No.156627
>>156625
>And how do (you) know there is no curve?
I definitely can ask exactly the same question and with the same argument about "authority".
And how do (you) know there is a curve?
Anonymous
No.156628
156629 156632
Im throwing you a bone here.
Flat earth proponents LOVE to push the 'conduct your own experiments' meme, and when (you) are ready to present your own findings, Ill be happy to give them the consoderation they deserve.
Bit you're not, you're presenting (very flawed) videos and articles from other people, and effectivrly acknowledging 'well, none of the flat earth models actually WORK with the solar system, but its enough to 'know' the earth is flat.
I mean, look at this guy here.
https://youtu.be/YaPa4esJJx4
I wont say his experiment is flawless, and I acknowledge that allows for the shard-earth theory which I further acknowledge the possibikity of given certain pieces of information that I have recently come into possession of.
But, while I acknowledge that the shard theory is not impossible, Im not promoting it.
(You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
Oh, speaking of standing, apparently gravity isnt a thing to flat earthers? Apparently we're being held against the earth by inertia of effectively a giant elevator?
>How is this possible
<Idk but that doesnt mean its wrong
Thats 'God of the Gaps'tier
>inb4 gaytheist talking points
Not an Atheist, bit there is an easy correlation to be drawn between the inability to rationally conceptualize an alternative that fits somehow excuses an otherwise laughable stance on the subject.
If any of the flat earth material were viable, you would be able to take that 3vidence and then apply it to another observable phenomenon, and tbey would be interconnected and play off each other; there isnt one set of observable physical phenomena one minute and a totally other set a few miles away. You should be able to say 'if this part of flat earth is true, then that would translate to this area, where we can see if the same observable phenomena occurs in a different context.'
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Anonymous
No.156629
>>156628
>I mean, look at this guy here.
>misdirection
In this bread there is plenty of information and proof to put the heliocentrism cult to rest for eternity.
Anonymous
No.156630
>>156620
>First off, (you)'re the one promoting the theory, the burden of proof is on you. But since I have a handle on things and can argue a point without logical fallacies and defensive deflection,....
Because sundials are a thing, amd they produce the same results no matter where on the planet you are. Additionally, round is a fundamental property of matter, as it is at a point of equilibrium when operating in a pressurized system. This is why tiny droplets of water bead, among many other observable phenomenon.
>but water gets flat on a plate
Yes, because it has reached a resting state, being acted on only by gravity and minimal air pressure.
The sphere is observable in all structures beginning with cells and microbes (Id suggest atoms too, but I havent seen it with my own eyes) and is a fundamental form of matter, plasma, and electromagnetism. Ever studied a magnetic field? They're easily observable with metal filings (unless,... the metal filings are in on the deception)
Anonymous
No.156632
156633 156634 156635
>>156628
>You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
You lie like a kike.
The breads speaks for itself. Laser experiments on water demonstrate without any doubts that there's no curve.
Read the whole bread of GTFO.
Anonymous
No.156633
156636
>>156632
Those laser experiments are flawed AND not reproduced. Try again.
Anonymous
No.156634
>>156632
Wait a second
Anonymous
No.156635
156636
>>156632
>You lie like a kike.

I REALLY hope you have some evid3nce for that claim. Please put it forward. Where and how have I lied.
Anonymous
No.156636
156637
>>156633
>Those laser experiments are flawed AND not reproduced.
How so? I'm interested, HOW they are flawed.

>>156635
>Where and how have I lied.
You said, quote:
>You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
From a logical standpoint no source need any approval from the heliocentric "priest" funded by (((governments))). You call "problematic sources" to anyone not licensed by the priests to investigate on the established pseudo science. Therefore it is (you) who resort to fallacies to support the round earth.
Anonymous
No.156637
156638
>>156636
>flaws
Fo one, theyre being conducted on a boat, on the water.
Now I dont know if you know about natural bodies of water, but Ill clue you in.
There is no such thing as a resting state. Ergo, you will never be operating from a level and stable platform. With the distances involved the most miniscule change in angle will produce results where the error threshold renders the results inconclusive AT BEST.
>priests
>licenses
So not what I said, thanks for proving who the liar.
When I say authority, I dont mean (((authority))) I mean a person who has an experiential wealth of knowledge about the subject and its experiments, who is credible in determining errors. I am not an authority, and yet I can already refute most of the assertions presented.
If a layman can do that to most of the evidence, how can you claim to have a leg to stand on?
Pick a video or article, and I will walk you through it and point out the errors. When I cant, Ill admit it. Deal? Pick your favorite.
Anonymous
No.156638
156639 156641
>>156637
>I dont mean (((authority))) I mean a person who has an experiential wealth of knowledge about the subject and its experiments, who is credible in determining errors.
I qualify to determine that.
I have a background in mechanical engineering.
Anonymous
No.156639
156640
>>156638
So do I
Anonymous
No.156640
156642 156644
>>156639
Great. Would you like to demolish the trigonometry associated with a boat balancing on a lake while projecting a laser beam over the horizon? Huh?
Anonymous
No.156641
>>156638
Also, you dont strike me as credible; your bias is toward conviction, whereas my bias is toward skeptical analysis. Again, I point to the planetary shard theory (which still has flaws, but one mustnt throw the baby out with the bath water,... you know, like you lot do).
And even if you didnt have such a boas, you would need to be present at the experiment in order to effectively error-correct.
The best a person with any understanding could conclude from the laser experiment is that it is inconclusive and needing further experimentation.
Its not a one and done anon. Youre not pushing a theory, because you dont have the evidence to justify the theory. You're pushing an ideology
>but, so are you!
Yes. I promotr by my skepticism the idea that if tjis were true, it would be overwhelmingly apparent by way of simple experiments; the inverse is true.
Anonymous
No.156642
>>156640
Knock yourself out, Ill get my popcorn
Anonymous
No.156644
>>156640
>Also, you dont strike me as credible; your bias is toward conviction, whereas my bias is toward skeptical analysis.
My bias is toward MATH. It doesn't add up. Simple trigonometry says there is no curve, and this is the reason why no NASA priest will ever debate a flat earther, again, it is because math doesn't lie.
Anonymous
No.156645
156647
See post >>149142 and end this pointless debate and hollow rhetoric.
Either you grasp math or you don't. If not, then keep silence and learn, faggot.
Anonymous
No.156646
idiocracy-movie.jpg
Also see post >>149168 for a refresher on the supposedly curvature, which doesn't exist when you look for it.
I don't know about American education, but most middle school students in most countries can understand trigonometry and use a simple calculator to reach this obvious conclusion.
Anonymous
No.156647
156648
>>156645
Thank you for those lovely diagrams. Now be a good little boy and run the numbers, analyze them, and then conduct experiments to validate the hypothesis; Ill be happy to show you where the errors are.
Anonymous
No.156648
156650
7tt5d70b.png
>>156647
>Ill be happy to show you where the errors are.
This is great and I'm glad to have you here, please go ahead, begin from the top of this bread and inspect the experiments shown.
Lighten this thread with your expertise.
Anonymous
No.156649
156651
https://youtu.be/GT7nmvjXC4U
It should be readily apparent that Im not trying to refute flat earth as a whole, thats an exercise in futility for the reasons neatly summarized in this video.
Im challenging you (not for the first time) to validate your own claims, and the certainty you assert.
My hypothesis is that when we get down to the details, I can tear your hypotheses/conclusions to pieces.
Anonymous
No.156650
>>156648
Ill reiterate. The burden of proof is on you. So, show your proof. Or, show where you have taken the results of others and applied them.cohesively, Ill settle for that.
Anonymous
No.156651
156652
1cd0.png
>>156649
>according to the Flat-Earth society
It has been established in this thread more than twice that such a "society" is a freemason controlled opposition tasked with to ridiculize flat earth. Obama, Clinton and many more golems used to mention the Flat-Earth Society to scare away the normies from the truth.
And since you mention it, it is clear that you are not arguing in good faith because or you didn't properly read this bread, or if you did, you are throwing libels without care.
Anonymous
No.156652
156653
>>156651
You misunderstand, yet again.
Im not presenting that video because I beli3ve the findings, Im presenting them as counter-point.
You seem to think you can simply post videos and that anyone who doesnt get it os in some way predosposed to opposing the idea, as opposed to seeing that there is two sides to an argument, and for every video or article that you claim 'proves' flat earth, ai can produce 3 tbat destory those videos.
Which is why Im challenging you to provide your own findings, self-derived or built off someone else's findings, that I can analyze.
Anonymous
No.156653
156654
circularreasoning2.jpg
12eb40b6822a90dd639f10c635de1138.jpg
>>156652
Okay.
Anonymous
No.156654
>>156653
The only conclusion I began from is, if there was any validity to the flat earth hypothesis, there would be cross-industrial cohesiveness to the findings.
Versus you, who is the one literally and figuratively using circular reasoning.
Anonymous
No.156655
Ill give you an example from personal experience.
I used to live 20 miles north of Sacramento, CA. In the roght weather conditions, you can see Sac from there, 20 miles away. This should not be possible if using a spherical globe model.
But its not as cut and dried as >8 miles onjects = flat earth. Upon furtner investigation, you find that the Sac valley has a gradual geological slope, with areas of Sac AT sea level.
The appearance debunking is due to various factors being neglected in the experiment. Now, Im not suggesting that the errors in flat earth videos and articles are making errors as glaring as thoae, but that doesnt mean there werent errors. And untill the experiments have been exhaustively conducted with various individuals producing comparable results, all you have is unverified claims and personal conviction.
In my example, I would literally be looking at a city too far away to perceive, and if I so concluded without asking someone ELSE if these findings are valid, I would be concluding/arguing equally (though obviously more egregious) unvalidated claims and personal conviction.
You're entitled to your theories as theories, but you are not entitled to promote unvalidation and conviction as fact, not without redress. I dont want to argue people or positions or any of that, I want to.see the exhaustove data points and results. A theory is not made true by conviction, it is observed to be true in the face of incontravertable evidence.
>I did a weird experiment that didnt produce the results the 'globe head' model says it should therefore flat earth. No, I cant share all my data, but heres a couple measurements
is anything but incontravertable
Anonymous
No.156657
156660
The only explanation I could work out of how the earth could be flat would be if the entire 'planet' was perched on the nose of an alien(or whatever) spacecraft, but oh wait would mean space exists.
I maintain the perception that the shard earth is plausible, but that theres no actionable body of evidence the flat earth is.
Also
>satellites are balloons
You do know they still use weather balloons right? Like, theyre way cheaper for data collection than satellites. Seeing a balloon (maybe) and a guy saying 'what is that', and then make the extraordinary leap to say that all satellites are balloons is technically not deserving to be justified with a response, but I will cuz I like you.
So, Ill take a note from the Rittenhouse defense when I say:
Hocus pocus, out of focus.
Anonymous
No.156660
156661
>>156657
>Seeing a balloon (maybe) and a guy saying 'what is that', and then make the extraordinary leap to say that all satellites are balloons is technically not deserving to be justified with a response, but I will cuz I like you.
We are told that there are thousands of satellites and assorted space junk orbiting this supposedly planet, it is natural to expect that some of them regularly will pass in front of the moon and be seen, but this is not the case at all. This is a very peculiar detail. Just saying.
Anonymous
No.156661
156668
>>156660
Zero doubt. It has been alleged that if one isnt oriented directly at the planet from space and look to the sides, there's a veritable fid of outside-the-atmpsphere depris, in something of a layer.

Which makes it increasingly dubious to attempt to credibly assert that satellites are balloons.
Anonymous
No.156664
*field
*credibly assert FROM ONE INCONCLUSIVE, OUT-OF-FOCUS VIDEO OF 'SOMETHING', that satellites are balloons.
Anonymous
No.156668
156673
sunrise-balloon.jpg
Project Loon Crash in Brazil.jpg
>>156661
>*credibly assert FROM ONE INCONCLUSIVE, OUT-OF-FOCUS VIDEO OF 'SOMETHING', that satellites are balloons.
Since there is not proof of the existence of space beyond CGI and freemason tall tales, but there is hard photographic evidence indeed of artifacts resembling satellites illustrations hanging from balloons, I'm inclined to trust my eyes and not the usual liars.
By the way, notice that Flat-Earthers base their conclusions on direct observations plus experiments, on the other hoof, round-earthers base theirs in just CGI plus faith on "licensed scientists" on a payroll.
Anonymous
No.156673
156675 156676
>>156668
>literally posts corroboration of balloons
>round-earthers base their positions on cgi n shit
An unsurprisingly ignorant assessment. I think Ive done my due diligence in illustrating that you wont present your own findings for review, but are content to promote an ideology that you cant answer the most basic questions of, and are therefore an idealogue for.
(read: a shill)
>inb4 n n no, you are!
Its not shilling to ask for evidence. Consistent, corroborated evidence, not a one and done. Its not shilling to observe that a claimant who refuses to do so and delegates to other unassociated youtube videos the responsibility to prove his point.

This is YOUR point, after all. You're the one shilling flat earth, and anyone who disagrees is subject to a crazy mind virus by the masons that prevents even the most credible of researchers as 'doing it for the $'.
No, you dont get to produce flimsy evidence and then claim that youve done your part. The standard of evidence is way higher than whay you present, and all you have done is attempt to question various elements based off random people's videos which I again assert are easy refuted. Oh, and meanwhile, those random one off videos are easily refuted by more people conducting the same experiment, but with better controls than those you present.
>pic 2
Hocus pocus, more out of focus.
Anonymous
No.156675
>>156673
>literally posts corroboration of balloons
Yeah, because the are actually balloons. Any doubt?
Anonymous
No.156676
156686
b7d.gif
>>156673
>Its not shilling to ask for evidence.
Read this damn thread, then come back to apologize.
Anonymous
No.156686
>>156676
>read through all the ridiculous horsehsit I posted and then apologize
No. And if you're unwilling to skip all the bullshit and just post or reference or even link to the posts of allegedly actionable data, why would I waste my time sloughing through? Youve already made it readily apparent where your position is, and your conviction to it. Youve further claimed that the data is 'in there somewhere', but cant be arsed to present it, even though they're your posts and points. Its hilariously and cruelly ironic that you make all sorts of laims like 'circular reasoning' in response to these requests, and your defensiveness and deflection basically tells anyone obaerving what I have suspected but wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt about; you're an NPC.

But if you ever decide to cut the bullshit and focus on just presenting the data, Ill be here
Anonymous
No.156757
o_Awfully Irish Podcast. EXCERPT.- Flat Earth.mp4
>Awfully Irish Podcast. EXCERPT - Flat Earth
Stupidity has no bounds. When an imbecile throw pieces of information to sound smart without understand what she/he is talking about.
Anonymous
No.156758
>cherry-picked strawman
Anonymous
No.157183
FE 5.png
FE 4.png
FE 3.png
FE 2.png
FE 1.png

Anonymous
No.157196
157205 157221 157272
6332196.png
The one true cosmology.
Anonymous
No.157205
>>157196
I can't argue against that.
Anonymous
No.157221
my-little-pony-friendship-is-magic-brony-party-reasonably1.gif
>>157196
You win this round
Anonymous
No.157272
>>157196
Mother Earth Pony.
Anonymous
No.157273
d6swi1n-1fc01bea-f50c-476c-81bb-fbaa3bf9b436.png

Anonymous
No.157419
157473
Hitler_Flat_Earth.jpg

Anonymous
No.157473
Flat_earth_Hitler.jpg
>>157419
Anonymous
No.157611
157613 157744
Hi. I have been tempted by this theory for a long time, but there is one empirical fact that does not seem to be explainable from the point of view of a flat Earth, and I can't allow myself to consider its plausibility it until this is resolved. I know this is a long thread and I haven't read most of it, but I searched for "midnight" and didn't find anything, so here goes my question.
Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole? The only justification I have found for this is that anyone who says there is such a phenomenon in the Southern hemisphere is lying. But if the flat Earth model is to be considered, it needs to address the facts, not hide from them.
I really like the idea of flat Earth and everything it entails. It makes the world look more interesting, I'm not going to lie. It's why I want to believe in it.
Anonymous
No.157613
157615 157744 157891
>>157611
>Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole? The only justification I have found for this is that anyone who says there is such a phenomenon in the Southern hemisphere is lying
There is a video provided by NASA showing the sun supposedly in the night with a clock on the upper corner of the screen to try to demonstrate that phenomena. The glaring problem for NASA is that that video is obviously edited, as the same clouds repeat themselves over and over again when compared them against the clock on screen. So the midnight sun is busted from the start.
I'm not sure if some of the long videos posted in this thread shows that, but if I find it again I will post it with the appropriate title.
Anonymous
No.157614
maxresdefault.jpg
>The Case for Flat Earth - by ODD TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8udts8Un4m4
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@ODDTV:b/the-case-for-flat-earth:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GuOVI5uSFu9G/
Anonymous
No.157615
157746 157891
>>157613
>There is a video provided by NASA
==And, what about the 30 days of night that Canadians, Alaskans, and Russians all experience?
Anonymous
No.157744
157745 157747 157891
maxresdefault.jpg
>>157611
>Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole?
>>157613
>There is a video provided by NASA
I found the video:

>Faking the 24 Hour Sun in Antarctica to debunk flat earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gsdHCcguqg
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/faking-the-24-hour-sun-in-antarctica-to:8
Anonymous
No.157745
157747
>>157744
>they used image compression in a sped up video = flat earth
Do you even understand the irony of the song in the soundtrack?
Anonymous
No.157746
2303.png
>>157615
>==And, what about the 30 days of night that Canadians, Alaskans, and Russians all experience?
I don't know about the north, I didn't research it yet, But perhaps the screenshot is related.
Anonymous
No.157747
157748 157754
Antarctica 24 hour sun Updated  WARNING -  The word S#!T is used..mp4
>>157745
My bad.
The second link of >>157744 is the right video.
Anonymous
No.157748
157749
>>157747
Okay. Ill acknowledge the video editing.
How do you jump from 'dodgy editing' to 'flat earth'?
Anonymous
No.157749
157750
>>157748
Sorry but if you cannot connect the most obvious dots, I'm not sure to be able to do it for you.
Anonymous
No.157750
157751
>>157749
>being this excited over shitty 'proofs' to act amug
I dont think you understand the standard of evidence. Probably why you're a flat earthrr.
Anonymous