/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
Anonymous
No.148614
148828 164125
HIGH ALTITUDE FOOTAGE - 22 MILES ABOVE EARTH.mp4
High altitude footage, 22 miles above earth; and a reminder of the math coming from the heliocentric model.
Anonymous
No.148618
>>148613
>floating in space
Would you be so kind as to offer a counter proposal?
Anonymous
No.148621
170385
216e40c10fc21cd5 1.jpg
Because this board is /vx/, the opening posts about Flat Earth should be addressed in proper fashion and I found the right /x/ stuff for the occasion.
Even if you reject the Flat Earth idea, just follow the below narrative as a /x/ fascinating mystery story, You'll learn a lot of incredible and undeniable facts with huge entertainment value. You won't be disappointed, guaranteed.
If you are one of those impatient anons, no problem, go ahead and jump to the last episode for the culmination, but the narrative won't taste the same, either way, it is not for narrow minds.

>The Lost History of Flat Earth - by Ewaranon (2020)
Odysee links in HD.

>Episode 1 - "Buried in Plain Sight"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/11:9
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q5SoQNkVIGgE/

>Episode 2 - "A Lens Into the Past"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-12:f
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jiSCnFRC93wm/

>Episode 3 - "Inheritors of Mud & Magnificence"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-13:2
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XaxSAOknYfgq/

>Episode 4 - "Back to the Future"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-14:7
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cHJm9mbgCTKq/

>Episode 5 - "The Whispering of the Water"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-15:2
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xixTVlEXDc7E/

>Episode 6 - "Offerus and the Alchemist"
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-16:3
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3TX1hZe7rcpJ/

>Episode 7 - The Known World
https://odysee.com/@flatearth:9/LHFE-1-7:5
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mRQ9P6Ij5Uqs/
Anonymous
No.148626
148701
>>148613
How can the earth be Flat if its a sphere and hollow. Check mate retards
Anonymous
No.148701
File (hide): B6DE61CDB15F86E04B52D8F2C088D735-31330454.webm (29.9 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:05:00, Flat Earth in 5 Minutes.webm) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth in 5 Minutes.webm
>>148626
Try to check mate this genius.
Anonymous
No.148828
148877 148938
>>148613
I live by the ocean. I look out the window and I see ships sink below the horizon bottom first. Sperg. This is shit people knew 2300 years ago. Aristotle talked about it. Eratosthenes not only physically proved it was round but also measured it accurately using angles and shadows (something you can still do today). Aristotle also talked about how gravity would necessarily collapse things into a ball, and yes, you can measure gravity yourself. My friend has done it.
https://physicsteacher.in/2020/12/24/how-to-measure-universal-gravitational-constant-measurement-of-g/

>>148614
It's called momentum and a vacuum. When you fly on an airplane do you feel movement when not accelerating? Then remove the air so there's no turbulence either and that's what we have. And with the video, it's not that high up. The atmosphere is a lot thinner than the earth is big, and any sphere looked at from a shallow angle and without seeing depth looks like a disk.
Anonymous
No.148877
148976
>>148828
>gravity
Gravitation is a concept invented to explain the heliocentric model, it was widely theorized with math by Newton and the Church of England begun to teach it around the world.
In the Terra centric model, gravity doesn't exist, above and below are the parameters together with density.
Anonymous
No.148884
148885 150415
200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball!.pdf
1758.png
3.jpeg
4.jpeg
5.jpeg
Book:
>200 Proofs Earth Is Not A Spinning Ball! - by Eric Dubay - (2017)
Anonymous
No.148885
150415
maxresdefault.jpg
>>148884
Also that book/presentation was made in video:

>200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball (HD Remastered)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEaHjPF47_E
Anonymous
No.148917
148922
I guess this might sound wierd but I don't really care either way.
I'm a bit curious, though. If the earth is flat, are there pictures of the edge?
Anonymous
No.148922
148983
>>148917
>If the earth is flat, are there pictures of the edge?
No, it is forbidden by the UN to even approach Antarctica. Only the military of the countries signatory of the Antarctic Treaty are allowed there.
Anonymous
No.148938
148976
gzrg.jpeg
cgnfgh.png
drhd.png
>>148828
>It's called momentum and a vacuum. When you fly on an airplane do you feel movement when not accelerating?
Check this out:

>Uniform Circular Motion is Constant Acceleration
>Consult any mainstream science publication or ask any science teacher "why can't we feel the Earth spinning?" and they will unanimously reply that it is because the globe spins at a perfect constant speed, and we can only feel acceleration or deceleration. As CoolCosmos writes: "Earth moves very fast. It spins at a speed of about 1,000 miles per hour and orbits around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles per hour. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant. You can only feel motion if your speed changes. For example, if you are in a car which is moving at a constant speed on a smooth surface, you will not feel much motion. However, when the car accelerates or when the brakes are applied, you do feel motion." The glaring problem with this claim rarely ever addressed is that the globe and everything on it, if it existed, would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform circular motion IS constant acceleration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAI3RNlMiFE
Anonymous
No.148951
148978 149114
31244d93bf05b58acb224e25cd5cc95a.png
28157460972_7b1594065b_b.jpg
ClKlJSIWQAEK9hu.jpg
ello-optimized-0ca605e8.gif
EwwqgelXIAAW7Jq.jpg

Anonymous
No.148952
148978 149021
f4a2564426137942ed6aaa5d70e45f75.gif
un.png
flat_sea_level.png
ggg-1.jpg
image0.jpg

Anonymous
No.148976
148977
>>148877
>In the Terra centric model, gravity doesn't exist
First, no, geocentric models still had gravity, but second that would just make it retarded.

>>148938
>would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform circular motion IS constant acceleration
No, it isn't. It's not speeding up or slowing down, spin doesn't mean acceleration.
Anonymous
No.148977
148978
df5.jpg
>>148976
>geocentric models still had gravity
Gravity = gravitation, and no, in the geocentric model what matters is "density", gravity is an invention to explain forces among fictional celestial bodies.

>>148976
>spin doesn't mean acceleration
Okay, get inside a washer machine and experience the centrifuge force, then come back and tell me spin doesn't mean constant acceleration.
Anonymous
No.148978
148979 148980
1749267.png
>>148951
>>148952
That's not how spheres work. Any sphere looked at without depth looks like a flat disk from any angle. So is there a way to see the depth, aka the curve that's heading away from you? Well, yeah. Ships disappear from the bottom up instead of shrinking indefinitely.

>>148977
>gravity is an invention to explain forces among fictional celestial bodies
Historically people believed in gravity way way before heliocentrism. They're not really related. It was viewed more like objects moving towards "their natural state", but a force that pulled them down depending on their mass still.

>in the geocentric model what matters is "density"
Ok. Run a simulation in your head for me. You have a tank of water, in it is a beach ball. The beach ball is less dense than the water. Then what? What happens? You need a force acting on the mass to pull the water underneath so the beach ball is pushed up. What force is it that pulls on matter?

>Okay, get inside a washer machine and experience the centrifuge force, then come back and tell me spin doesn't mean constant acceleration.
1) That's not acceleration. Acceleration means speeding up, but every part keeps moving at the same speed. A centrifugal force isn't acceleration.
2) Do you get thrown off a merry-go-round when standing on it? What about one that only rotates once every 24h the size of a planet? Tangential speed doesn't mean a force, and we actually spin pretty slowly very far from the centre of the spin, meaning there's next to no force put on us.
Anonymous
No.148979
149113
>>148978
>and we actually spin pretty slowly very far from the centre of the spin, meaning there's next to no force put on us.
Speed = 0 at the poles.
Anonymous
No.148980
148982 148987
1538565351952.jpg
1538246193722m.jpg
2062738__safe_smolder_ocellus_yona_female_cute_edit_text_cropped_changeling_crying_image+macro_offscreen+character_sad_caption_reaction+image_changed.png
>>148978
>1) That's not acceleration. Acceleration means speeding up, but every part keeps moving at the same speed. A centrifugal force isn't acceleration.
It is rotational acceleration.
Why?
Because the forces acted on the object accelerate and deaccelerate (that means accelerating in the opposite direction).
I want you to have a circle, now have a stick or pencil or some shit.
Make the pencil go around the circle so it's perpendicular to the center.
That's the direction of the force. Changes in direction (angles and degrees) need to be acted upon.
So yes it is accelerating.
It can maintain rotational acceleration or change in rotational acceleration.

>Thread is pics related.
Acting dumb for shits and giggles is fun until you're surrounded by bottomless pits and professional idiots.
Keep in mind glowniggers and 'tarded urinary brainpan where you are. I'd recommend you'd stop while you're still ahead.
Anonymous
No.148982
Bombassteawithbombasspones.png
>>148980
To clarify the perpendicular is the direction of acceleration.
>Make the pencil go around the circle so it's perpendicular to the center.
>The direct connection to the edge of the imaginary circle is the direction of the force so that it moves around the perimeter of that circle . Changes in direction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ9AH2S8B6Y
Anonymous
No.148983
bcc.png
>>148922
GUARDIANS OF THE EDGE. FUCKING BRILLIANT!!!
Anonymous
No.148984
157751
Asking to be spoon fed.png
Prove to me it's flat.png

Anonymous
No.148987
51.png
>>148980
>Keep in mind glowniggers and 'tarded urinary brainpan where you are. I'd recommend you'd stop while you're still ahead.
Chillax anon.
There are plenty of inconsistencies about the tall tale that we live on a ball.
It is so simple as to take a look and judge for yourself.
Anonymous
No.148988
149160 149630
BH81dnOqC10F0g9wLKsCUslX.jpg
File (hide): A986E628ADB28AC44FBA13D5E164DCE5-3962759.mp4 (3.8 MB, Resolution:480x360 Length:00:01:28, EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.mp4
The History of Flat Earth
>From the beginning of recorded history, and for thousands upon thousands of years, cultures across the entire world all believed the Earth was flat. Their various cosmologies and cosmogonies differed in slight ways but their overall geographies and astronomies were incredibly consistent and in fact virtually identical. The Earth was a stationary plane void of any motion or curvature, flat across its entire expanse except of course for hills, mountains and valleys. The North Pole was the magnetic mono-pole center-point of the flat Earth with Polaris, the North Pole star situated directly above. Polaris was the only motionless star in the heavens with all the other constellations revolving perfect circles over the Earth every night. The stars were divided into two categories known as the fixed stars and the wandering stars. The fixed stars were so-called because they were observed then as we can observe today to stay fixed in their constellation patterns night after night, year after year, century after century, never changing their relative positions. The wandering stars, what are today referred to as “planets,” were so-called because they were observed then as we can observe today to wander the heavens taking their own unique spirograph-like patterns making both forward and retrograde motions over and around the Earth during their cycles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQCXT2pkans
Mirror: https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/TheHistoryofFlatEarth:3
Anonymous
No.148997
Freemason Science.png

Anonymous
No.148998
retired astronaut miroslaw hermaszewski says earth is flat.mp4
>Retired astronaut Miroslaw Hermaszewski says earth is flat.
>Mirosław Hermaszewski is a retired Polish Air Force officer and cosmonaut. He became the first Polish national in space, when he flew aboard the Soviet Soyuz 30 spacecraft in 1978.
Be sarcasm or not, it gives something to wonder.
Anonymous
No.148999
149021
13319991_10154190153969293_4497998689689066340_n.jpg
13557777_10154425074812868_3449646834900043559_n.jpg
13686732_10155080187473916_7638657560704061215_n.jpg
13615254_10154988989848916_7297770299845639125_n.jpg
13620379_10210152618830996_7068970089046039028_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149006
12188973_835947749858985_7587837116332086854_n.jpg
12194714_1099199473432546_1370258105500317540_o.jpg
12345574_10153920828139789_8324631083290181413_n.jpg
12438963_10207375778107016_160422834393011052_n.jpg
12805812_1563831277265596_2901413702458475686_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149007
sydney-santiago.jpg
Actual flight routes from Sydney, Australia to Santiago, Chile.
Curious, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.149018
149019 149021
Why would anybody want to cover up that the world is flat?
>inb4 Jews
Why though? To what end?
Anonymous
No.149019
149020 149021
>>149018
>Why would anybody want to cover up that the world is flat?
One reason I've heard is that it moves us from God. A globe earth in a vast universe makes us insignificant in the grand scheme, removes the spiritual connection we had, and turns people into atheists. And people who don't believe in God and the importance of our existence are easier to dupe and turn away from God and good.
Anonymous
No.149020
149022 149111
>>149019
The idea of the earth as a speck in a vast universe doesn't move us away from god. It just shows that God's greatness it more than we could ever comprehend.
Anonymous
No.149021
149029 149037 149114
>>148999
>>149018
>>149019
You do understand all intelligence agencies love being able to implant any idea or belief in anyone. Doesn't matter if it's true or false.
It's because they can. Not if they should, but could they do it.

So how does a flat Earth help anyone?
What benefits does it have that are exclusive to that in comparison to the standard Earth thinking?
Otherwise it's pointless trying to convince people about something utterly worthless.
>>148952
From anywhere in the world according to them you'll always be able to see the ice wall. It's completely flat right? Ice is typically white. So if you send a laser beam to that it'll reflect back and everyone will see big shaking beams of light.
How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall. Then go off the little disk you think the Earth is.
Anonymous
No.149022
149023
>>149020
I'm not sure how the full explanation goes as I'm just paraphrasing from what I loosely remember seeing.
Anonymous
No.149023
149027
>>149022
Is this what you believe?
Anonymous
No.149027
>>149023
I assume you believe that you live on a spinning ball and your ancestors were monkeys.
Anonymous
No.149029
149055
>>149021
>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall.
Well, the problem with that is that the UN is threatening with violence anyone wanting to explore the zone, as you realize the common peasants have not means to defend themselves against ships' artillery.
Anonymous
No.149037
149055
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
>>149021
>Otherwise it's pointless trying to convince people about something utterly worthless
Redpilling is never pointless.
And the consequences of a Flat Earth are big. Imagine most of the so called scientists being ridiculed for their stupidity and dishonesty because they have chosen career and money over science and truth.
Imagine all governments pushing the lie being unmasked for their collusion about space programs, which brings into focus if most politicians and government career employees involved are anti-national agents executing orders from their gurus in the lodges.
Anon, fetching the freemasons to the foreground is casting light on the jewish hidden hand.
Anonymous
No.149055
149071
>>149029
You do realize video of being shot at is a piece of proof for your cause right?
>>149037
>Makes scientists salty
>Proof that everything is a lie
Well prove it, you have the plethora of models but you also need to do stuff with it that what people call normal do.
Unless you like tieing your shoelaces together before you even start.
Anonymous
No.149071
149105 158051 162816
15178998_10103495894266818_4131841977607878122_n.jpg
16427504_2207448179479833_766779611374271250_n.jpg
18221979_1514168511961467_5232080132222084985_n.jpg
53.png
>>149055
>Well prove it,
Have you even read this thread?
Have you ever read and understood something about physics? If you didn't, don't worry.
Just the very basic first step for you. If this realm' shape is a ball, trigonometry says that at the first mile the horizon should drop 8 inches, 32 inches at the second mile, and so on. Simple light reflection on the water denies that. Experiments with lasers on the water also deny any curvature. So, where the hell is the curve?
Whan
Anonymous
No.149105
149108
UUUU.gif
VVVV.png
BunchaSquares.gif
>>149071
That's not my point.
You're making a fool of yourselves in such a way people will remember it when it matters most.
Ya'll dun fucked up. To such a degree that even jokers would cease. No the ones that watch the jokers would have an ax to grind.
Then there's ponies and actually escaping the hell ya'll found yourselves in. You could stay there in your mind maybe have to go on day by day till you could actually have an ounce of self agency.
You do know they don't actually need you right? I get that's what you've signed up for, but you could take backesies.
You know that if they wanted you to do such a mission they'll frame the aircraft as another post. Amongst these.
Are the side benefits that good?
Is it a future promise by people that are meticulous in cleaning up every loose end? That you'll trust them? By the time you'd put the counter action into motion to recieve your dues from them they'll recieve dues into you.
That's...
If you so desperately want your chains that'll snuff it before your promised prizes It'd argue against that.
Not stupidly mind you, just out of professionalism at the very least.
So that's why the actual big wigs don't take any of you seriously. To me? That'd hurt quite a bit. That you're running their iconocracy for them you'd stick to being the monkey. Their monkey.
Well that's illuminating but doesn't seem all that bright. Anyway sorry about the psy flag on the files, but you do need to at least hear this.
Dream on little dorgy dream a dream for squee. I'd break down the complicated multi message ciphers but that'll waste the point fo perfectly crafted individual messages.
Do they package such things for you? I suppose that counts but seems to me rather cold much like where restructuring and shaving the important proportions in a slavery that from that point ever more may probably be everevereverever.
The ocean sends his regards. Make of that as you will. Laying about just won't seperate it anymore.
I'm truly, not sorry, but a sort of empathic sympathy not necessarily mine. Protip, every four letters because it's wwww.
Yes like the band. Not that band the blander one that's obvious.
it's all up to you -song lyric
Anonymous
No.149108
149116 151702
12985609_10153765032723138_2373695083229142377_n.jpg
12993479_10153765033223138_2466106082904053476_n.jpg
13000093_10201403957216124_5709800593971380303_n.jpg
13000265_10153765028963138_1297600089255160361_n.jpg
13001164_10153765002073138_2733709319793178327_n.jpg
>>149105
>deflecting
If you live on a ball, where is the curve?
The most basic question and still no answer.
Anonymous
No.149110
149650
14712526_2128314564059862_4729204600220941288_o.jpg
Where is the curve?
Anonymous
No.149111
149172
er.jpeg
>>149020
Pretty much.
Anonymous
No.149113
151703
img_9608.jpeg
>>148979
Anonymous
No.149114
149115 149116 158743
162553-nature-landscape-winter-snow-cold-ship-sea-iceberg-Antarctica-technology-vehicle-Polarstern.jpg
antarctic sound.jpg
B15K-II-Mike_Usher.jpg
mp_11.jpg
349EBDB6-3B7C-4B50-ABAD17A0F3B4EB14_source.jpeg
>>149021
>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall. Then go off the little disk you think the Earth is.
You are really upset anon.

>How about you buy a plane and go stream your journey to the ice wall.
Actually there are a couple of tours in summer to Antarctica for around 8,000/10,000 per passenger, leaving from Argentina, if I'm not mistaken they visit a peninsula far to the north from the real antarctic ice shelf, but according to current "official" pictures and the descriptions of captain J. Cook, see first pic >>148951 ; the edge is real.
Anonymous
No.149115
158743
>>149114
Okay, theres an oceanic Ice wall in Antarctica. Captain Cook described it. Kudos. Its still a remarkable stretch to use that to justify a flat earth. Maybe Im coming into this late, and there are a few points ITT that make me 'hmmm', but 'not having an answer = flat earth' is not an argument. Where is the evidence?
Anonymous
No.149116
149123
197.png
>>149108
>>149114
There's a difference between knowing you're big and thinking you're big.
Seems to me you lack the mental abilities in creating to scale dimensions. I'm sorry for your loss.
Anonymous
No.149121
33453586492322.jpg

Anonymous
No.149123
149124 149125 165153
98041.jpg
nikon-p900_zoom.jpg
sewet.jpg
>>149116
>Seems to me you lack the mental abilities in creating to scale dimensions.
It looks like you didn't do the research.
Optical experiments demonstrate over and over again that there's no curve.
Take in count that you don't need expensive equipment to debunk the curve (Nikon P900 and P1000), remember that on this hypothetical ball the horizon should fall 8 inches the first mile and 32 inches the second one.
So, it is now "Reproducible Experiments" (real science) versus the "Established Agreed Truth" (propaganda).

But let us see what the "authoritative" priests have to say about Flat Earth (fascinating establishment damage control):
>Buzzfeed's Fake Flat Earth Theory Debunked
>In the following presentation head of the International Flat Earth Research Society responds and corrects several misconceptions and falsehoods in Buzzfeed Multiplier's video "The Flat Earth Theory Explained."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecnlz7SXDCk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Buzzfeed's-Fake-Flat-Earth-Theory-Debunked:4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/G3QjI1gtPpZQ/

>NASAs Top Globe Proofs Debunked
>In the following presentation the President of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay debunks NASA's Assistant Director for Science Communication Michelle Thaller's top "proofs" that Earth is a spinning ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/NASA's-Top-Globe-Proofs-Debunked:e
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zBj0xAEOCYDS/

>Flat Earth Science: Not Wrong or Stupid
>In the following presentation International Flat Earth Research Society president Eric Dubay debunks science communicator Sabine Hossenfelder's video "Flat Earth Science: Wrong but not Stupid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rebktApD31I
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Flat-Earth-Science-Not-Wrong-or-Stupid:1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/R7gDpjIvWJvW/

>Theoretical Astronomy Debunked by Empirical Reality
>In the following presentation astronomer Dr. Stuart Clark's video "An Astronomer Responds to Flat Earth Theory" is refuted and debunked by the president of the International Flat Earth Research Society.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXyot6Coe58
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Theoretical-Astronomy-Debunked-by-Empirical-Reality:6
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2dkN9u5I7jWY/

> Neil Tyson's Flat Earth Star Talk Debunked
>In the following presentation the President of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay debunks astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson's top "proofs" that Earth is a spinning ball.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Neil-Tyson's-Flat-Earth-Star-Talk-Debunked:1
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VaiSf0uJOMth/
Anonymous
No.149124
maxresdefault.jpg
>>149123
>Take in count that you don't need expensive equipment to debunk the curve (Nikon P900 and P1000)
It is an impressive camera/telescope

>INCREDIBLE ZOOM | Nikon P1000 | Ben Lomond | Scotland
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhQlwKX3LQA
>Two Planets, a Star, and a Moon - Nikon P1000 Camera
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGvV_GcOkjs
>Nikon P1000 - Maximum Zoom Range Test (93 KM / 57 Miles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Sx3rAdz2SA
>Nikon P900 zoom test, "readable" distances
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRp13pRzzWQ
Anonymous
No.149125
149126
>>149123
You can do the experiments correctly but still manage to fuck up on decoding the meaning.
Get one of those planetary telescopes, you know the ones that looks really far away the consumer commercial kind.
Then try to find another content. Heck you could find the ice wall and see right past it. 'Cause according to you if the Earth is flat you should be able to see that far.
All of it. Just turning around completely to see the whole world in under twenty seconds.
No risking it all, no leaving the house (unless you live in a ditch), nothing at all strenuous or strange.
All that you would have to do is record the thing. Wouldn't that be cool.
Unless you're telling me that's also impossible.
Anonymous
No.149126
149131
>>149125
You are misinterpreting the experiment. I'm not sure if it is because of your lack of knowledge on physics or just trolling.
The point of zooming is not about how far is possible to see, but to demonstrate that there is not any curvature hiding ships or objects.
Anonymous
No.149127
2630.png

Anonymous
No.149131
149142 149160 149174
>>149126
How far are you zooming?
You do realize that the earth only appears flat at ground level because of its sheer enormity, right?
Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
Anonymous
No.149142
149169 156645
Eqyf57fXMAAIWqm.jpg
851.jpg
Dowrt.png
se.jpg
>>149131
>You do realize that the earth only appears flat at ground level because of its sheer enormity, right?
Read the whole thread faggot, there are plenty of videos debunking the curve by bringing objects supposedly hidden behind the horizon in full view.
Also read about trigonometry, it's not difficult, math proves that the curve is a lie. But if it is too convoluted for you, then a CAD software like AutoCAD might do the trick for you in a graphical fashion.
Anonymous
No.149160
149168 149169
703.png
>>149131
>Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
It's debunked.
See clip >>148988
Anonymous
No.149168
149634 156646 163835
earth-curvature-scale.jpg
>>149160
By the way, as seen in that clip, the distance from the observer (camera) to the boat is at least 2 or 3 miles. Trigonometry says that the boat's hull should be hidden by the curvature from 32 to 72 inches, see pic for the values.
Obviously that is not happening and the claim of the Earth being a ball is busted. NASA and all paid shill scientists are lying.
Anonymous
No.149169
149170
34EDE13AC067E81844615BD590B37673-675023.png
1569647083100-4.jpeg
92A9784DAEDE374BB1F7F3EBAF5480D4-111684.jpg
3642AC40E894DB78FAA4007DFE3EFE56-16768.png
>>149160
You're just going to accept a video without proving it yourself. What are you a sheep?
>>149142
I guess you are...
Anonymous
No.149170
149173 149174
2zoyl4m0a9tz.png
261006.jpg
>>149169
Anonymous
No.149171
149172
>>148613
niggle me this flat earthers. why would the jews lie about the shape of the earth?
Anonymous
No.149172
149173
>>149171
See >>149111
Anonymous
No.149173
9ECDA514F9170D903A7E1DC01352C58E-875324.gif
A8C3C14AA1A25A987F661D506E1FCF98-250570.png
>>149170
>>149172
And what other reasons. You know there's more you want to say.
Anonymous
No.149174
149177
20170812_102028.jpg
20170812_105059.jpg
20170812_123720.jpg
20170904_072335.jpg
>>149131
>Also, the curvature of the earth is apparent at long distances, like how ships appear to sink at the horizon as they dip past the subtle curvature of the earth.
How about when you're on top of a mountain? If the Earth really is "flat", then you should be able to look out and see even taller mountains far beyond.
<Instead, you just get this.

>>149170
>Second pic
That's another thing, how is all the water able to stay on "Earth" if it's flat? Also, aren't tectonic plates basically tearing apart the world? Wouldn't that mean that Earth would have been "destroyed" millions of years ago?
Anonymous
No.149177
149178
>>149174
>how is all the water able to stay on "Earth" if it's flat?
It appears to be contained by the Antarctic edge, But can't be confirmed because the UN and its associates will violently oppose any exploration.
Anonymous
No.149178
149203
>>149177
>It appears to be contained by the Antarctic edge
Then, isn't the U.N. in the right for getting all their knickers in a knot over global warming?
Anonymous
No.149203
149208
>>149178
>global warming
You know that that is another psy-op. Right?
Anonymous
No.149208
149219
>>149203
So, the multiple ice ages and warmer periods like during the dinosaurs are all psi-ops?
Anonymous
No.149219
149223 149226
you must be new here.png
>>149208
Global warming is a psy-op prepared from the 70s by the Club of Rome, another globalist club founded to shape international policy.
Check the Great Reset thread for further redpilling newfag >>>/mlpol/286845 →
Anonymous
No.149223
149229 149233
>>149219
Then, how do they explain all the underwater cave paintings? Or the fossilized remains of giant floral and lizards?
Anonymous
No.149226
>>149219
>Club of rome
And how do the jews fit in?
Anonymous
No.149229
149238
>>149223
You are being dishonest. Glacial and warm periods extend for thousands of years and are not related the the globalist hoax. Warming is so real as the coronavirus hoax.
Lurk moar faggot: >>>/mlpol/302668 →
Anonymous
No.149233
>>149223
/mlpol/ is always right, nigger.
Anonymous
No.149238
149239 149242
>>149229
>Glacial and warm periods extend for thousands of years
Then how did the planet not lose all it's water thousands of years ago when the glaciers were melted?
Anonymous
No.149239
149240
>>149238
I think you have a theory.
By all means, let us hear it.
Anonymous
No.149240
149242
>>149239
Because the Earth is a sphere.
Anonymous
No.149242
>>149238
>>149240
Not sure what are you talking about but if the subject is huge volumes of water, then I would like to point to the big flooding narrated by many ancient civilizations, even the Bible mention it.
Anonymous
No.149243
149594 149598 149629 149649 163830 164075 168416
06_01_008377_new-standard-map-of-the-world-by-buffalo-electrotype-and-engraving-co.jpg
>15 Nov 1892.
>From the Boston Library.
Notice the computational details on this patented navigational map, the patent is literally a mechanical computer for Worldwide Navigation.
File is 4773x6794 pixels, 31.4 MB.
Anonymous
No.149244
1538409036154.png
2419198__safe_imported+from+derpibooru_female_pony_oc_mare_oc+only_looking+at+you_absurd+resolution_filly_one+eye+closed_abstract+background_-fwslash.png
1597195291921.jpg
2394414swastika_checkmate.png
Well technically the Earth is an irregular ovoid.
But you see the truth is the Earth is more akin to the life generating symbol in pic 2 the windmills of friendship.
Anonymous
No.149245
antarct.jpeg
>2014
>Norwegian 'viking' won't pay Antarctica fine
>A self-proclaimed viking who sailed a yacht from Auckland to Antarctica without permission has been fined but refuses to pay.
>Norwegian authorities fined Jarle Andhoy 45,000 Norwegian kroner (NZ$8360) for violating environmental protection protocols in the Antarctic Treaty.
>If he doesn't pay he will be given a 50-day suspended jail sentence.
>Andhoy believed there was no obligation to report to sail on the open sea. He would not pay the fine, he said
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/10291142/Norwegian-viking-won-t-pay-Antarctica-fine
Anonymous
No.149246
72LVnhbytUHu_640x360.jpg
>Chemtrails vs. Curvature
>Scifidan has been feeling a little left out recently so here's a little video he can watch in his safe space....
https://www.bitchute.com/video/72LVnhbytUHu/
Mocking the sheeple.
Anonymous
No.149247
149248 149255
>falling for the flat earth psy-op
>not realizing the earth is actually hollow
Anonymous
No.149248
149253 149255
>>149247
The earth is hollow to store the botched metaphor for abortion on a kid's show
You know, The Cluster.
Anonymous
No.149253
149255
>>149248
I haven't a fucking clue what you mean or what show this is. But the earth is hollow, you just have to know where the entrances are.
Anonymous
No.149255
149259
Cubic Earth.jpg
>>149247
>>149248
>>149253
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.149259
149265
>>149255
Cubes can be hollow.
Checkmate retard
Anonymous
No.149265
158836
Equestria is Flat.png
VUwBBVD.jpg
Limestone - Upset.png
>>149259
Try to debunk this.
Anonymous
No.149266
149267
The people who call us crazy.jpg

Anonymous
No.149267
74mbjb5.jpg
85751870.jpg
meanwhile_in_australia.jpg
me-cracks-a-joke-about-things-being-upside-down-in-australia-55417266.png
snb113rg63941.jpg
>>149266
Anonymous
No.149275
File (hide): C2649B643807EC85593698A2AC8B8506-5924999.mp4 (5.7 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:54, llo564848481EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
llo564848481EDIT.mp4
>Dollar Vigilante
>NASA lies and the shape of Earth.
Anonymous
No.149281
FE-Art.jpg

Anonymous
No.149357
File (hide): DF317F54EEBDB4BF05A90D6B569BD078-10551276.webm (10.1 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:43, Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH.webm) [play once] [loop]
Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH.webm
Why are they obsessed with FLAT EARTH?
>We are NOT the Flat Earth Society. The Flat Earth Society is Govern-Ment mind control.
>We live in a world of lies pushed on us by the upper levels of the world controllers. It is easier to lie to someone than to convince them they have been lied to especially when they are unknowingly addicted to the fear. If the FOUNDATION of your world belief is that you are on a spinning water globe pear rocket flying through an infinite space vacuum, then you will not know WHO you are, WHERE you are and WHAT you truly are. You will be lost and feel insignificant not KNOWING that you are at the center of creation rather than on a speck of dust in an ever expanding universe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99fWjLYnT2Y
Anonymous
No.149543
File (hide): E9D5F7E0F9B68EC28C03252BE061DF45-2754881.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:360x360 Length:00:00:56, flat earth - the ground doesn't move.mp4) [play once] [loop]
flat earth - the ground doesn't move.mp4
Flat Earth - The Ground Doesn't Move.
Anonymous
No.149561
917468_909371065779325_1607452567_n.jpg
1468644_475373942662345_4170037771692388836_n.jpg
3002088c98c3f160b6ae9ffea2f59a27.jpg
10399998_814688535276377_8587554492356579603_n.jpg
11952842_10200781045126000_2346973169323563268_o.jpg

Anonymous
No.149565
File (hide): 7D7D1D9C5E530FB2A85E48B42901B266-1903512.mp4 (1.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:27, Impressive footage from Amazon studios.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Impressive footage from Amazon studios.mp4
>A kike in space
Impressive footage from Amazon studios.
Anonymous
No.149567
149592 149594
This-wont-change-the-fact-that-the-earth-is-still-flat.jpg

Anonymous
No.149592
>>149567
Yeah, OP explain this please.
Anonymous
No.149594
149595
transformation-Mercator-navigation-projection.gif
1446.png
>>149567
>according to flat earthers
That's an obvious lie.
FYI, the map used by most military during World War 2 was very similar to >>149243
The modern maps are Mercator projections meant to match the round Earth lie.
Anonymous
No.149595
149596
>>149594
The map you're referring to is a round earth map.
Anonymous
No.149596
149597
2515.png
>>149595
Look again.
Anonymous
No.149597
149598
>>149596
It contracts at the pole to represent the roundness of the earth.
What are you sourcing to imply that this map is a flat-earth model used for WWII?
Anonymous
No.149598
149599 149600
>>149597
Let get some things straight, until WW2 schools were teaching the Earth was flat, then the concept of a "planet" and the theory of gravitation was introduced the the mass population as facts. The hoax of space and spacial travel also was deployed to solidify that false belief.
And going back to the map of >>149243 you might consider it as a official Flat Earth map because it was used as such.
Anonymous
No.149599
149601
>>149598
>until WW2 schools were teaching the Earth was flat, then the concept of a "planet" and the theory of gravitation was introduced the the mass population as facts.
What are you sourcing this from? Where did you hear this?
Anonymous
No.149600
156620
>>149598
>The hoax of space and spacial travel also was deployed to solidify that false belief.
What about satellites? You can see them in the sky if you're in an area with no light pollution.
Anonymous
No.149601
149602 149617
>>149599
>Where did you hear this?
A woman born in 1920 America. I'll post her testimony as soon as find the clip.
Anonymous
No.149602
149603
>>149601
I had a grandparent who was in WWII. He never mentioned anything like this.
Anonymous
No.149603
149604 149606 149610
>>149602
>He never mentioned anything like this.
Very possible because the concept of planets and space travel were narrowed to academia and science fiction authors like Julius Verne.
Anonymous
No.149604
149607
>>149603
You're saying he was brainwashed?
Anonymous
No.149606
149609
>>149603
>concept of planets
Mars and Venus are visible from the surface of the Earth. To what capacity are you saying planets don't exist?
Anonymous
No.149607
149608
>>149604
Not at all, I'm saying that common people at that time hadn't TV to make them believe baloney.
Anonymous
No.149608
149610
>>149607
References to a round earth in science and literature date back long before TVs were invented.
When did this supposed conspiracy start, and how did they get the entire world on board? Wouldn't other countries, especially those at odds with one another, just point it out to embarrass their foes?
Anonymous
No.149609
149611
>>149606
When you use a telescope planets are not balls, but a luminescent objects roaming the sky. They were called errand stars for a reason.
Anonymous
No.149610
>>149608
>References to a round earth in science and literature date back long before TVs were invented.
I agree. I mentioned it at >>149603
Anonymous
No.149611
149612
>>149609
If you use a much more powerful telescope, they look like rocky spheres.
Anonymous
No.149612
149613
>>149611
I'll post the clips later.
Planets according NASA's CGI, versus reality.
Anonymous
No.149613
149614
>>149612
Round Earth pre-dates NASA by quite a bit.
When is the conspiracy supposed to have started?
Anonymous
No.149614
149615 149627 149639
>>149613
>When is the conspiracy supposed to have started?
When the Freemasons re-introduced heliocentrism at the time of Illuminism and the Renaissance.
Italian Galileo Galilei ring a bell?
Anonymous
No.149615
>>149614
I am aware of him, yes.
Anonymous
No.149617
hqdefault.jpg
hqdefault2.jpg
>>149601
>A woman born in 1920 America. I'll post her testimony as soon as find the clip.
I found the clip. Go to timestamp 2:22 for the lady's redpill; she was born in 1918.

>Ruth, 102 YEARS OLD. Pre interview clip
>I was taught the earth is flat!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP4pZJ1Szvw
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/102-year-old-ruth-was-taught-the-earth:f

Another of her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K87w1B019s
Anonymous
No.149622
149623 149630 150415
5257.png
>A Stranger's Guide to Flat Earth: 21 Questions and Answers Proving The Earth Is Flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZkGY1Pa8_E
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/21-Questions-and-Answers-Proving-The-Earth-Is-Flat:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/595frYc2yTug/

Content:

Question 01 - 00:15 - Where is the edge?
Question 02 - 04:02 - Where does the Sun go if the Earth is flat?
Question 03 - 05:30 - What's underneath the Flat Earth?
Question 04 - 07:06 - What about ships & boats disappearing over the horizon?
Question 05 - 08:19 - What about all the pictures of the Earth?
Question 06 - 11:01 - Why are all the other planets round?
Question 07 - 12:30 - What about satellites & GPS?
Question 08 - 14:00 - Is outer space even real?
Question 09 - 17:36 - How is circumnavigation possible on a Flat Earth?
Question 10 - 18:23 - How come the Moon is upside down in the southern hemisphere?
Question 11 - 19:14 - What about seasons?
Question 12 - 20:09 - What about gravity?
Question 13 - 22:02 - What about the Coriolis effect?
Question 14 - 23:17 - Why can't I see infinitely far?
Question 15 - 24:10 - Is the Flat Earth a religious thing?
Question 16 - 25:24 - Is The Flat Earth Society behind the resurgence of the Flat Earth?
Question 17 - 26:59 - Are all scientists, pilots & members of government in on it?
Question 18 - 28:21 - NASA isn't the only space program. Are all the others in on it too?
Question 19 - 32:29 - Who is responsible for this deception?
Question 20 - 34:27 - Why the lie?
Question 21 - 36:43 - What's it mean if the Earth is flat?

Bonus content - 39:17 - Dear NASA, why are you lying?
Anonymous
No.149623
File (hide): BF0494089F1DC649D83201ED72E2C709-9878062.webm (9.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:58, rrr.webm) [play once] [loop]
rrr.webm
File (hide): A72BE234E07326A99EA6260DC3DBB6D5-2731795.webm (2.6 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:21, ttt.webm) [play once] [loop]
ttt.webm
>>149622
A couple of clips.
Anonymous
No.149627
>>149614
>Italian Galileo Galilei ring a bell?
The guy who was imprisoned because he refused to allow his work to be proof-read and declared that anyone who questioned his ideas was an idiot (Even to the point of mocking the then-current pope in his thesis)?
Anonymous
No.149629
158743 163795
Columbus and Cook voyages according to Flat Earth.png
>>149243
You do realize how ridiculous that map looks when you actually analyze the voyages people committed in the past, right? For example, Captain Cook. He explored much of the Southern Hemisphere. Logically speaking, if the earth was flat, as that pictures describes, then he would have had to travel an insane amount of distance, spending innumerable years of his life trying to navigate it all. However, when one actually looks at his voyages, all of them lasted for three years. For reference, Columbus' second through fourth voyages all lasted around the same amount of time.
<So yu can see, Cook's voyages are in red, Columbus' are in blue
So, unless he was using a speedboat, how is it possible to travel around the edges of the Earth, in such a short amount of time?

Also, explain the arctic poles.
Anonymous
No.149630
149631
>>149622
>Question 02 - 04:02 - Where does the Sun go if the Earth is flat?
<It's all "perspective"
What about the month of complete night and sunlight that Northern and Southern regions experience every summer and winter?
>Question 14 - 23:17 - Why can't I see infinitely far?
<It's because your eyesight is shit and there's too much dust in the way
Okay, why doesn't someone set up a laser system to prove their theory, then? A simple laser pointer is capable of still being visible for 12 miles away. Why setup a system to see if what you're seeing with the zoom shots shown in this video are legit or mirages: >>148988
>Question 21 - 36:43 - What's it mean if the Earth is flat?
<[Starts going on a rant about fiat money, the NWO, and all the same bullshit that Neo-Libertarian conservatives have been repeating since Ron Paul made it cool]
Have ANY of you guys actually bothered to rewatch any of that shit from over a decade ago? Or, am I the only one who finds humor in how Alex Jones turned out to be the biggest source of controlled opposition?
Anonymous
No.149631
149633
>>149630
>Okay, why doesn't someone set up a laser system to prove their theory, then?
There are plenty of videos with lasers debunking the curvature.
Do the research faggot.
Anonymous
No.149632
4bbf98acceae208f434c57ace4365828.jpg
191-3.png
9651.png
964130.png
15073521_1153975034639598_9143357851300631580_n.jpg

Anonymous
No.149633
149637
>>149631
Okay, link them
Anonymous
No.149634
972ddc34aa9a36983c8fedda6d90b7fe92bec5067dd2371503c32e36c64989d0_1.jpg
According to the ball lie and as it is stated at >>149168 , the Chicago skyline at a distance of 50 miles, should be hidden below 1,667 feet of curvature.
Anonymous
No.149637
149649 165091
16.4-Mile Laser Test Confirms Earth is Flat.jpg
>>149633
The jewtube algorithm scrubbed them all, now only (((authoritative))) opinions are shown. However I managed to find a couple.

>Flat Earth | Laser Test Proves The Flat Earth - Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBhDFO4NMrw

>16.4-Mile Laser Test Confirms Earth is Flat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KYfodwnHAI
Mirrors:
https://www.brighteon.com/31db2f7b-135d-4a76-8e7e-451db974db45
https://www.bitchute.com/video/h058DU2FSf7k/
Anonymous
No.149638
File (hide): DAAC125D5A80ED7FC0B025833663DDE2-7382390.webm (7.0 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:50, 85T.webm) [play once] [loop]
85T.webm
86.png

Anonymous
No.149639
162586
>>149614
>Muh Freemasons/Illuminati
>Galileo started it
People have been speculating about the Earth being round since the 5th century BC, when Pythagoras was still figuring out new number tricks. From there, the information spread and people were able to both astronomically and mathematically prove it from the third century AD all the way up to 1522, when Ferdinand Magellan and Juan Sebastian Elcano circumnavigated the Earth FORTY YEARS before Galileo was born. If you're going to spout garbage, at least make it conform to actual history and not just fit whatever your single-digit IQ remembers from your elementary school knowledge of the sciences.
Anonymous
No.149641
If the earth is flat why does the sun rise at one end of the horizion and set at the opposite end? shoudnt we see the sun and moon rotating in circles above us the entire time? Seems like a jewish trick to me
Anonymous
No.149647
Tesla - Quote.png
Tesla: "Earth is a Realm, it is not a planet".
Anonymous
No.149648
149649
LEVEL.jpg
File (hide): 666B828604A5F6F0E664565CDF3DAAB4-8978364.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:02:10, LEVEL (2021) (360p).mp4) [play once] [loop]
LEVEL (2021) (360p).mp4
LEVEL (2021) | First Flat Earth Documentary
>Are flat earthers insane? Are they delusional idiots, so convinced of the wrong belief that they all become very passionate truth seekers and activists that want nothing more than to spread their ideas for the benefit of all humanity?
>No. Flat earthers are you. They are me. They are everyone and just because some people are indoctrinated into the heliocentric model of earth from a young age and still have a hard time letting go because of it, doesn't mean that those of us that know the truth about this world are going to give up on them.
>They are family. Whether you know it or not, you and I are referred to as "useless eaters" in the eyes of the self proclaimed leaders of the world.
>They wish to destroy us and the things we love in order to reduce the population to a more desirable number that's easier to steer and control.
>We must unite before it's too late and stand our ground if we have any chance at a future without one world totalitarian rule.
>We are taught that the earth is a cosmic accident and that life is meaningless because it's the only way to continually use us as batteries to power their economy, which is the real life matrix.
>If we all knew the truth about where we are and where we come from, their would be a revolt overnight and the government that you know today would not exist in the morning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXU10zS1zFk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@ODDTV:b/level-(2021)-first-flat-earth:6
https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/level-a-flat-earth-film-2021_993zULRmPWdZzry.html
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=4HM5W1AW5KHN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4SiTwJSONQk9/
Anonymous
No.149649
149650
>>149637
Hold up a second!
If the Earth is flat according to the according to the picture displayed here: >>149243
Wouldn't that result in the laser being to the right or left of the viewer? They cannot look at it straight on because, for example, if one were to look directly West along a latitudinal degree, everything would curve around to the right (With the reverse if you're facing East). Basically, imagine the Earth like a giant merry-go-round. The only exception to this would be if they were looking at it from a longitudinal angle, which would remain a straight line.
<But that doesn't explain how they can still see the laser.
Because light bends: https://archive.ph/zFuJY
With one of the reasons being gravity: https://archive.ph/tfho5

>>149648
>>We are taught that the earth is a cosmic accident and that life is meaningless because it's the only way to continually use us as batteries to power their economy, which is the real life matrix.
How is it possible for me to be a creationist, yet even acknowledge that sounds insane?
Anonymous
No.149650
149659
disapproval, my little pony - twilight sparkle.png
>>149649
>Because light bends: https://archive.ph/zFuJY
>links to a diffraction article
Diffraction is diffusion, not bending.
It might be said that light bends when "refraction" is the phenomena, see >>149110

>With one of the reasons being gravity: https://archive.ph/tfho5
>according to (((Einstein)))
It is a "THEORY", aka speculation, aka a hypothesis.

>How is it possible for me to be a creationist, yet even acknowledge that sounds insane?
It is an obvious analogy.
Anonymous
No.149658
FLAT EARTH CULT MEMBERS COME DEBATE ME (IS THERE ANY AMONG YOU THAT IS NOT A COWARD).mp4
>FLAT EARTH CULT MEMBERS COME DEBATE ME (IS THERE ANY AMONG YOU THAT IS NOT A COWARD)
Here it is shown the wrong approach to the subject. It is not about the biggest dick, but the soundest science.
Anonymous
No.149659
>>149650
>It might be said that light bends when "refraction" is the phenomena
Actually it is not bending, but bouncing.
Anonymous
No.149688
149775
Flat Earth mentioned and explained in animatic series.mp4
>For kids
>Flat Earth mentioned and explained in animatic series
https://t.me/flacheerdegemeinschaft/5936
Anonymous
No.149734
163515
1141.png
>Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms
>Rather than genuinely inquire and research the proofs/evidence against the spinning globe model and for the stationary plane Earth, many people instead employ a variety of unconscious defense mechanisms to protect them from ever learning anything new.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn9utRKNwhs
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Anti-Flat-Earth-Defense-Mechanisms:4
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D7Ot1oqaqVj3/
Anonymous
No.149775
149789 149870
File (hide): 8B9D675A156B15CD143C2BE6088DDBEE-26298954.mp4 (25.1 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:41, Modern cartoons.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Modern cartoons.mp4
>>149688
Anonymous
No.149789
55.png
>>149775
Anonymous
No.149869
Flat Earth WINNING...May Get As Big as Climate Change and Vaccines....mp4
>American government TV
>Scientists are worried that Flat Earth may become a political issue
Anonymous
No.149870
149871
>>149775
Shows like this should be illegal.
Anonymous
No.149871
149873
>>149870
imagine a world where Standards And Practices has to erase all degeneracy from children's media
and govt funded art grants can only go to art that fits criteria intended to weed out degeneracy
Anonymous
No.149873
149878
>>149871
Jews would abuse such legislation to stomp out opposition and "problematic" content.
You'd need to erase Jews before you did that. Jews are the reason why we can't have nice things.
Anonymous
No.149878
>>149873
>Jews are the reason why we can't have nice things.
Pretty much this.
Anonymous
No.149879
149962 149963
0de15b1404f0b61abb1c9b64298cb74d223bb15aa1241aed0477877711d79cf7_1.jpg
24a969087c25975c00835a7ef83244ed.jpg
14890562_2134649686759683_5234146108156457705_o.jpg
EBNs7eGWkAkdWlC.jpg
unnamed.jpg

Anonymous
No.149961
Go2MJKr5bUZc_640x360.jpg
3550.png
>The Fall of Gravity
>The Fall of Gravity presentation is a collaboration between University of California Davis Electrical Engineer Vahid Ebrahimi and Head of the International Flat Earth Research Society Eric Dubay.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/The-Fall-of-Gravity:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Go2MJKr5bUZc/
Anonymous
No.149962
162586
>>149879
>image 1
it makes a claim and then doesn't even try to back it up. Discarded.
>image 2
the solar system exists on a plane for the same reason that every planet except Uranus (long story) generally spins on the same axis, and that's because everything aside from the sun started off as a protoplanetary disk, something that has been observed elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy and subsequently confirmed as of 2018, and thus seems the most likely origin of our solar system. If you want to know what a protoplanetary disk is, then look it up because there are many people who can explain them better than I can.
>image 3
I looked this one up because I was legitimately interested. Anyway, Sir Ranulph Fiennes and his world record for doing so would like a word, alongside the others who undertook the same race back in the 1970s/80s.
>image 4
Photoshop exists. Enough said.
>image 5
Do you see that little thing down there in the bottom right in the map? It's to show you roughly how far it is from point A to point B on there by giving some rough distance estimates.
Do you see how it has sets of lines and numbers, all differing in respective meaning in relation to the map? That's because the map has inaccuracies just like any other projection that has ever been put into use. The projection most commonly used as the flat version of Earth by people in your sphere happens to have the inaccuracy or "warp" as it is more formally referred of splaying out as it goes further south in order to maintain the polar-centric circular projection. Thus, the corrections need to be made for proper calculations of distance. Now, if this was the real state of the Earth, then why would those corrections need to be made at all? Why wouldn't there just be one line with one set of numbers for the entire map? >muh different units of measurement! No, that doesn't work. There are 14 separate lines, each with their own different meanings. There are only 2 units big enough and widely used enough to matter on a worldwide scale, the mile and the kilometer (imperial and metric.) Even assuming each of those lines is some different way of measuring distances within those two systems, that only adds up to 11 separate units (4 imperial, 7 metric,) requiring us to somehow pull 3 more units of length out of our asses to accommodate the other three lines shown. Anyone who knows these things better than me can feel free to correct any mistakes I've made, and anyone who thinks I'm wrong on any of these points is free to challenge me. I welcome the idea of learning new things, so I may be convinced if a more convincing argument than facebook-tier images are given.
Anonymous
No.149963
149964 149969
>>149879
I really love how this thread is so full of completely un-cited claims that do nothing to help me consider the alternative point of view even after I give it the benefit of the doubt.
Anonymous
No.149964
149965
1.png
>>149963
>un-cited claims
You may begin with the lie that there is a curve behind the horizon. This thread shows plenty of empirical evidence debunking the curvature.
Anonymous
No.149965
157892
>>149964
I'm saying that all these memes that make claims with no sources aren't helping.
Anonymous
No.149966
Former Senior Officer in the CIA says NASA is Not a Space Agency.mp4
Former Senior Officer in the CIA says NASA is Not a Space Agency.
Verbatim.
Anonymous
No.149969
149971 149972
>>149963
so many claims, so little sources, and so far out of the two- now three- posts I've made here nobody's been able (or at least willing) to prove me wrong. I'd love for that to happen, but something tells me that the guy's just not able to.
Anonymous
No.149970
dc8a30e8430272a124448def4d20aac7.jpg

Anonymous
No.149971
64ba7fac.jpg
>>149969
>nobody's been able (or at least willing) to prove me wrong
And your sources are... NASA?
Anonymous
No.149972
149974 149975
1406901905191.png
6219465.png
>>149969
That's the simplicity of it. They want you to indoctrinate yourself to it to yourself.
They'll always maintain their aloofness from hard truth. That's why flat earth memes are rarely good of they are it's usually due to their failure.
The kinds of tactics are like a very familiar slime when squeezed. Not even a good kind that has a little bit of something. Because of the substanceless usually displayed corrodes anything of value. Which is why they pair it with many important topics with actual documented seriousness.
It can be explained with nuts.
Mine and others have the seed to germinate life extremely successfullyfilled with nutrition for the journey.
Theirs is completely dry to such a degree that they do it because of fear. Then they goad people into making a soggy waffle so they get to eat it. As they taste the life force as a whore supping on a fapichino they are watched because they have the same reactions every time, to determine the categorization of both the ideas and the effectiveness of which it can change a deadend husk.
That's the most scary part for these watchers.
This is their test bed to see if it is possible and how much it is. Along the way they drag immigrant issues through the mud by meer association, intentionally or not.
The best part of this is breaking the mental scaffold that replicates this is a testament to selfbrain washing. As such the solutions are viable.
It gets even better though because now a man can act on his own if he so dares to venture into his mind. A call to action made by himself to himself.
:plot: :jar:
Anonymous
No.149973
149976
smirk-vector-1.png
Well, if some round earther may explain why the famous curvature fails to show up in every experiment done, then your credibility might increase.
Anonymous
No.149974
162586
>>149972
Now that you mention it, I too notice a certain (((resemblance))) in the argument styles used by these types. They never even look at the ideas and points you make, content to continue arguing circles and making you look stupid by association while giving those of feeble mind the misplaced confidence to hold fast to their incorrect assumptions. Very familiar indeed.
Anonymous
No.149975
>>149972
>They want you to indoctrinate yourself to it to yourself.
At least Jews put some effort into their propaganda.
This is like trying to get a commie to explain how communism works and they just shout "do your own research!".
Ffs, I try to keep an open mind, but it's really annoying when all I get in return for considering someone else's viewpoints is half-baked memes and unsourced claims.
Anonymous
No.149976
149978
>>149973
>explain why the famous curvature fails to show up in every experiment done
[Citation needed]
Anonymous
No.149978
149979
mane-six-mlp.png
>>149976
>[Citation needed]
Read the thread anon.
The citation you ask is in the physics books.
Anonymous
No.149979
149985
>>149978
I have read this thread, and it's almost nothing but loose ends with no source.
Anonymous
No.149985
Pony - blind.png
>>149979
If you say so.
Anonymous
No.150022
150023 150025
85260298.png
85260300.png
85260299.png
85260303.jpg
85260304.jpg

Anonymous
No.150023
150024
>>150022
>Pic 5
Gravity and magnitsm.
Anonymous
No.150024
>>150023
Wtf the air cant be magnetic it's not metal like my fridge magnets
Anonymous
No.150025
150026
>>150022
>implying the border between the atmosphere and space is a sheer border
The air gets thinner with higher elevation. That's why high altitude locations have less oxygen. As you go higher, the air gets thinner and thinner until there is no air at all, which would be a vacuum.
Anonymous
No.150026
150027 150030
>>150025
Building on your point, space isn't a perfect vacuum either. Near to the sun as we are, there are actually a rather large number of particles flying around through our general vicinity due to factors like leftover particles from the birth of the solar system and even particles radiating off of the sun itself through solar wind and such. Space outside our solar system isn't a perfect vacuum either, but it's certainly more empty than space near the sun.
Anonymous
No.150027
150030
>>150026
Yeah, space is not a perfect vacuum at all.
Vacuum is by definition relative.
Anonymous
No.150030
85260331.jpg
>>150026
>>150027
>space
C'mon.
Anonymous
No.150031
150034 150037 150073 164415 164434 164461
maxresdefault.jpg
135.png
>The nail in the coffin of the heliononsensical model. By: Owen Benjamin
>Owen has completed his journey from not ever looking and just believing to having looked and now knowing that the heliononsensical model in impossiBALL.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqp4SJksTlQ
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/the-nail-in-the-coffin-of-the:9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qqp4SJksTlQ/
I hope anons already understand the concept of acceleration and inertia.
Anonymous
No.150034
150073
>>150031
Owen Benjamin literally drinks turpentine to cure his gay thoughts. He’s a literal Retarded faggot. I wouldn’t want him parroting anything I believe
Anonymous
No.150037
150042 150065 150073 150093
>>150031
The earth doesn't rotate around the sun and the sun doesn't rotate around the earth.
Everything rotates around one unknown thing at the center of the universe.
My money's on a fucking big sun. The biggest one imaginable.
We're dust compared to our sun.
And our sun would be dust compared to that sun.
So when you think about it...
Thinking of earth as the center of the universe everything else rotates around is nicer than pretending our sun's more important than any other.
Anonymous
No.150042
150054
d521.gif
>>150037
>sun worshipper
Anonymous
No.150054
150062
>>150042
Who said anything about worship?
Anonymous
No.150062
150073
>>150054
Don't you just love when a faggot personally attacks you for a bullshit reason while completely ignoring what you have to say?
It means you win.
I am right. To say the earth revolves around the sun is an oversimplification at best and entirely false in actuality.
It really is a matter of perspective.
Sunsimps only hate the "we earthlings are the center of the universe"chads for having self-esteem.
Anonymous
No.150065
>>150037
>Everything rotates around one unknown thing at the center of the universe.
Galaxies are centered around black holes. Perhaps there really is a supermassive back hole at the center of our universe.
Anonymous
No.150073
150079 150145
05534fbfbd0dd73a8c5bcf331d946e9e579b189ffc0dc915dcb2f3196ebe603a.jpg
>>150062
>Don't you just love when a faggot personally attacks you for a bullshit reason while completely ignoring what you have to say?
That is exactly what happened with >>150031
Answers >>150034 and >>150037 evaded completely the physics facts. Science, specifically physics, it is what is being judged.
You cannot ask for to entertain your derailing answers.
Anonymous
No.150079
>>150073
>Science, specifically physics, it is what is being judged.
Correction:
It is not science per se what is being judged, but its priests and their lies. Scientists were and are corrupting science to make it fit an agenda.
Anonymous
No.150093
150133 150136
>>150037
I mean, technically the Earth is the center of the observable universe, so everything that matters to our species is quite literally centered around this blue-green marble we call home.
Anonymous
No.150133
>>150093
Sunfags on susicide watch
they literally don't even earn the word suicide. They earn a stupid unfunny amogus reference.
Anonymous
No.150136
150149
>>150093
>I mean, technically the Earth is the center of the observable universe
I would like to mention that if there is not ball, then there is not space or universe. But a firmament and stars.
Anonymous
No.150145
>>150073
Cry all you want it’s not gonna stop your boy Owen from being a closeted homosexual who takes advantage of his fans.
Anonymous
No.150149
150159
>>150136
The "universe" it totality. The metaphysics of it don't matter. Whether they're fixed stars or in space it's all part of the universe.
Anonymous
No.150159
150317
>>150149
If motion requires something else to compare it to, is the universe technically moving?
Anonymous
No.150169
maxresdefault.jpg
>k-Rock 95.5 Australia - Flat Earth is ridiculous!
>Do you want the red pill or the blue pill? The choice is yours. If you want to know the truth about our flat world, watch these videos in order and there will be no turning back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGpUqX8DD9w
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/k-rock-95.5-australia-flat-earth-is:5
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ohC3cpRhKurI/
Anonymous
No.150195
627.png
File (hide): 99D0067EFB5E1EF3E2AD2B8487E42E2A-9960053.mp4 (9.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:58, Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt.mp4
>Obviously It's Fake - Podcast on Flat Earth (1:10:27 long)
>Banned on Youtube
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Zu3KrZ2y7r4v/

There is an excerpt showing the normie reaction of the stream hostesses after the stream ended. It's priceless imho.
I attach it here. (4:58 long)
>Flat Earth - Obviously It's Fake excerpt
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/flat-earth-obviously-it's-fake-excerpt:9?
Anonymous
No.150294
150317 151693 160515
1354.png
89156.jpeg
Private Rocket Hits The Dome at 73 Miles Up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVIVfoJ2Yh4
Anonymous
No.150317
150319
File (hide): C24E79BBDDC8B144FD15792F9CACE50B-3215375.mp4 (3.1 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:10, Slow Motion Shotgun.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Slow Motion Shotgun.mp4
>>150159
That's the theory. The Earth turns on it's axis, the moon orbits the Earth, the Earth orbits the sun, the sun is one of millions of stars that is orbiting the black hole that creates the Milky Way, and everything is slowing moving itself apart from one another.

>>150294
>Rocket Hits The Dome
Wouldn't that cause it to explode? Or immediately bounce back?
<Also, slow motion video is a thing.
Anonymous
No.150319
Screenshot_20210811_004737.png
Screenshot_20210811_004758.png
>>150317
>Wouldn't that cause it to explode? Or immediately bounce back?
It looks like the rocket got caught in some kind of force field. Even if somebody may claim that the rocket exhausted its propulsion and fell, that very fast spin was stopped on the spot.
I'm posting 2 screenshots showing that the rocket's camera is using an eye fish lens. That's the reason why the horizon switches between concave and convex.
Another video:

>Unedited Footage of 2014 Go Fast Rocket (full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAuu-Zg9ejw
Anonymous
No.150329
This is the map used in all planes with an Auto Pilot.mp4
Map and airplanes.
Anonymous
No.150392
150393 153844
Challenge for flatfags https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AQl8h7Aa75s
Anonymous
No.150393
150402 150408 150409
maxresdefault.jpg
t4wtc.jpg
>>150392
>10 Challenges For Flat Earthers
Accepted.

- 10 Flat Earth challenges completed - Playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXUlIF7bNXinjYvrS3BcWaoan5yeAFez0

- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 1 - Maps)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmbSqgzpyqo
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 2 - Antarctica & Sunlight)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLBMxnwrkC8
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 3 - Eclipses & Predictions)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhtzhWZiLrU
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 4 - We See Too Far Dave)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMAoJqMAN8A
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 5 - Boats "Over The Curve"?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erUKDM7Cmxo
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 7-8 - Dave Wants Balloon Footage & Eclipse Review)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPH9QXLkJsU
- 10 Challenges For Flat Earthers: COMPLETED (Part 9-10 | Flights And "Something Scientific"}
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htkuWUOqI4I
Anonymous
No.150402
>>150393
Thanks bro
Anonymous
No.150408
150409 150413
>>150393
Quick question, why are each of these videos two hours long in order to "dispute" a video that's 12 minutes long, with each video spending entire sections wasting people's time with useless information that doesn't answer the question being presented, doesn't link to the original videos being used, and some of the sourced channels in questioned being terminated by the author themselves?
In other words, why is there no actually answer to the question, and instead just some drawn out statements that fall into the same fallacies that were pointed out in the original challenge video?
Anonymous
No.150409
150410
5cb.jpg
>>150393
>>150408
To put it another way, GET TO THE FUCKING POINT!
Anonymous
No.150410
7b.png
>>150409
>GET TO THE FUCKING POINT!
Sure. Our realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.150413
150414
86ab.png
>>150408
>In other words, why is there no actually answer to the question
I agree those videos are way too long and try to explain too much.
I believe the creator's intention is to educate the average person without a physics background.
The Flat Earth subject must dive in mathematics, physics and many other hard science branches in order to debunk lies and fake science. Obviously this is not the preferred flavor of most people because they lack the very foundations to grasp the concept, so an entertainment approach usually is chosen.
Anonymous
No.150414
150415
>>150413
>I agree those videos are way too long and try to explain too much.
They don't explain shit. What does the length of the coastline have to do with traveling from New Zealand to Chile? Why do none of them attempt to disprove the curvature of the Earth buy doing their test from any of the plains like the Utah Salt Flats like the guy insisted? Why do none of the videos directly say, "This is the reason why, and now I will explain how that works"?
Anonymous
No.150415
150416
54732f6a1beeec18ed457e501040c30b6b43d9738ec246f18d81063b46f5fddd.png
>>150414
>"This is the reason why, and now I will explain how that works"?
No problem.
If you are indeed hungry for knowledge and according to you, you despise to waste time, you should see >>148884
>>148885 and perhaps >>149622
Anonymous
No.150416
150417
>>150415
>If you are indeed hungry for knowledge
THAT IS NOT WHAT I ASKED FOR.
What I asked for is for you to explain, in simple detail, why it is that the so-called challenges proposed in are "easily" disproven. Videos that are hours on end and documents that hundreds of pages log or make fallacies claims that do explain anything to do not make an argument nor are constituted as "knowledge".

Actually take the time to explain and refute shit. There's more than enough posts in this thread already asking questions that have been outright ignored.
Anonymous
No.150417
150418
eef3.png
>>150416
Oh, I see.
Basically you are demanding spoon feeding without any research whatsoever on your side.
Anonymous
No.150418
150419
>>150417
You're the ones making the claims that the Earth is flat. Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to explain why those claims are false. That includes answering any question people have, despite how stupid they may be.
Anonymous
No.150419
150420
9ba.png
>>150418
>Therefore, it is YOUR responsibility to explain why those claims are false.
You mean that the claims are true, anon.
I'm posting the claims and I back them up with proof.
If (you) can't or don't want to understand the stream of devastating facts, then I suggest you read and watch them again.
I can't be responsible for your failure.
Anonymous
No.150420
150422
>>150419
>I refuse to explain jack
Then we have nothing left to discuss.
Anonymous
No.150422
150425
69849ce2968cbb7ead160e87bc7b05a3cfabc3f77c5ff8f028f853608f109048.png
>>150420
You don't want to discuss, but to trap your opponent. In other words, you are not after the truth, but to prove I'm wrong to make you feel better.
What about if you make the research and demonstrate that Earth is a ball. By the way, the argument that because NASA says so doesn't count.
I would love you could back your religion up with facts.
Anonymous
No.150423
>>148613
Earth is shaping like potato chip.
Anonymous
No.150425
220956.gif
>>150422
Good job, be the establishment figureheads by imitating smug SJWs proud of their new gender theory.
Really excellent work.
Would you like a cookie too?
That people would spend the time of day doing time consuming experiments that require a precision, accuracy and dedication to actually get consistent data. And then analyze for the fun of looking at the numbers.
Or they just sort of shrug say who gives a fuck and move on?
Go ahead do what you're doing that's what some of your vocal video members do. They could be right, they could be wrong.
But that didn't matter because if you actually wanted to prove your point it's all a matter of propaganda and information delivery.
You are terrible there.
The very first thing people ask is why should I care.
>Cause governments are lying!
Okay, we know that what else.
>Earth is flat! Mean you been lied to!
Okay, lots of people already do that.
How is it important for me to know this?
>...
When I could use the really big lie, and get good enough. We do that anyway so what's the big deal?
>. . .
>Truth
But does it help me? Can I actually use it to my advantage and have something critical from it for later use?
>. . .
Okay, I'm not going to waste my precious time on this then, good bye.
>
>WHY IS NOBODY SEEKING OUT THE TRUTH!?
>AHHHHHHHHHH?!
Anonymous
No.150481
150482
44146.png
Flat-Earther Destroys Globe in Live Radio Interview_EDIT.mp4
>Flat-Earther Destroys Globe in Live Radio Interview
>Re-Mastered version of the ground-breaking interview where President of the International Flat Earth Research Society exposes and explains the globe hoax to Coast 2 Coast AM radio co-host
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Flat-Earther-Destroys-Globe-in-Live-Radio-Interview:d
Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4ruLflqsyK7Y/
Anonymous
No.150482
150483
1336614f_grin.gif
>>150481
So that's all. No one knows why just believe us.
>If Globe spirituality is ded
>If Flat spiritually is not ded
<Black budget for something else
<Gravity their god
That's fucking retarded.
Because what do you do with that information afterwards.

Well you answered my question so here's a pony. Good job.
Anonymous
No.150483
150484 150485
4753.png
>>150482
>So that's all. No one knows why just believe us.
You are gaslighting.
Stick to the facts. There's not any demonstrable curve, therefore there is not ball. So simple, so straight forward.
Anonymous
No.150484
2362988__safe_anonymous+artist_princess+cadance_alicorn_pony_4chan_breaking+news_car_george+floyd_george+floyd+protests_meme_minneapolis_minneapolis+riots_parod.png
>>150483
>No one knows why they go about spreading Global propaganda
>It's a fucking mystery
>If Globe spirituality is ded
>If Flat spiritually is not ded
<Black budget for something else
<Gravity their god

That's what your video claimed.
Anonymous
No.150485
>>150483
Gaslighting does not exist
Anonymous
No.150600
when-challenge-reality-force-them-research-conspiracy-theorist.jpeg

Anonymous
No.150601
150604
maxresdefault.jpg
k4.png
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein! (3:12:35 long)
>Today we take a look at what all mainstream scientism is based on by looking at Albert Einstein's Theories of Relativity.
>His 'theories' are the very definition of sophistry and we are going to show you why.
>We will be joined by our special guest Karen B
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vybj6E9WE4

Mirror with video divided in 2 parts:
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein. P1 (1:32:00 long)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ng5BdyPdMug4/
>The Incredible Sophistry of Albert Einstein. P2 (1:39:53 long)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QKAwet7lKzNK/
Anonymous
No.150604
Screenshot_20210821_050625.png
File (hide): 2A0B0AE2985E9174D3B74CF6B074EE4F-6590486.webm (6.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:31, EDIT.webm) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.webm
>>150601
Jump to around 1:18:10 for a funny moment.
You can't make this shit up.
Anonymous
No.150615
150616
Do any Flat Earthers have an explanation as to the following two questions:
>1. Why is it possible to see both the Sun and the Moon, in the same general direction, during the day?
>2. Why does the moon change colors and size?
Anonymous
No.150616
150618
>>150615
The moon doesn't change colours or size. It just appears to, because of moon clouds.
Sometimes clouds of space dust get in the way of our view of the moon.
Ever seen the moon blocked by a white cloud closer to us and our light source?
Ever seen the moon blocked by a black cloud far out of reach of our light source?
Anonymous
No.150618
150621
>>150616
>clouds of space dust
...WHAT? Has anyone considered the possibility that Flat Earthers are from the same brand of retards that brought us Otherkins: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=lFRjrLmc_4c
And Breatharians: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=WWRniMqhr00

Anonymous
No.150621
>>150618
You heard me, faggot. Do you deny the existence of space clouds?
Anonymous
No.150990
DvuCdqIWoAAbUsD.jpg

Anonymous
No.151017
C-XkkCIXoAATOJR.jpg
qlPDEF1.jpg
SlJ3MtW.jpg
XHb1dv2.jpg

Anonymous
No.151197
151503
489156.jpeg
056.png
>Smoking Gun Proof From NASA Software Engineers That Mars Rovers Are On Earth — Not On Mars
>Richard Hall — a British engineer who runs the website RichPlanet.net — has done a series of videos examining an increasing mountain of evidence suggesting serious chicanery involving these rovers on “Mars”. As they say, “a picture is worth a thousand words” — and those pictures allegedly coming back from Mars are being surreptitiously vetted long before the public — and even most NASA employees — get to see them.
>In Hall’s series “Where Are The Mars Rovers?” he discusses many of these anomalies with his fellow scientist Andrew Johnson. In Part 3 of that series, they discuss a lengthy anonymous essay posted on an astrophysicists blog written by a software engineer who had worked for NASA — and during a routine trouble-shooting job with the rover, discovered a “backdoor” in the Mars rover’s software that allowed NASA to receive thumbnail images from the rovers “on Mars” allegedly in real time — no time delay, but because of the immense distance between Earth and Mars — this would be a scientific impossibility — as radio transmission faster than the speed of light is an impossibility.
https://christiansfortruth.com/smoking-gun-proof-from-nasa-software-engineers-that-mars-rovers-are-on-earth-not-on-mars/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1tLS1IUnRQ
Anonymous
No.151503
151653
85260313.jpg
>>151197
Anonymous
No.151653
151657
2636038.png
>>151503
>NASA PHOTOSHOPPED THIS IMAGE!
<Literally just searching the text in the image reveals it's from a video tutorial on using photoshop, and has no actual connection to NASA.
In this thread we see the mortal predilection for mimicking the actions of their superiors, without comprehending those actions, nor even attempting to comprehend them.
Mortals have seen people claim that the establishment sometimes lies, and have some vague inkling that the establishment cosmology has foreboding implications. Thus the earth is "obviously" flat (because coming up with their own individual view is harder than just copying someone else's view), and those unsettling possibilities are rendered harmlessly false.
Mortals have also seen people post examples of doctored images to support their claim that someone is lying, so hey, here's a doctored image, it must support my claim!
In addition to searching the text, if one reverse images searches the red version of the picture, the only place it shows up red is in places where they're claiming it's proof of the mars landings being fake, and never shows up anywhere being claimed as a real photo of mars.
Any anon who's worked at a grocery store (or similar) will be familiar with another form of this mimicking behavior, where "people" grab food that's behind the stuff in front without knowing why real people do it. As such, those "people" often get products with the same exact expiration date as the product in front (and waste both their time and the stocker's time), or sometimes even get a worse expiration date if things happen to have been stocked improperly.
This mimicking is also why it is impossible to have a real discussion with a mortal, because they do not comprehend how an exchange of ideas and a resolution of differing opinions works, nor can they comprehend the idea of multiple different views being reasonable interpretations of the limited information and experiences available to the participants. They've just seen the general flow of "debates", and mimic the behavior of the "winning" side.

Remember anons, while it is very tempting to try and dissuade these unfortunate "souls" from their errant path, it is often a waste of time. Many such circumstances are such that anyone who can comprehend why the position is wrong, already won't believe it, and those who do believe it can't comprehend the reasons it's wrong. It's an example of the typical human behavior of assuming that everyone is relatively similar to oneself, which makes anons believe that surely this "person" simply hasn't encountered the alternative viewpoint, and is completely capable of understanding it. This belief is, sadly, often incorrect.
Anonymous
No.151657
>>151653
>Remember anons, while it is very tempting to try and dissuade these unfortunate "souls" from their errant path
So, may I know where is the curve?
Remember anon, if there is no curve, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
Where is the curve? Huh?
Anonymous
No.151658
Flat Earth; Antarctica - Dome Described in 1958 Encyclopedia and Prior Editions!.mp4
Flat Earth; Antarctica - Dome Described in 1958 Encyclopedia and Prior Editions!
Anonymous
No.151659
File (hide): 18F47444EAB9334A590EDB39ADED54BF-2693358.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:55, Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.mp4
Nikon P1000 - (2021).jpg
Nikon P1000 Debunks The Globe.
Anonymous
No.151660
C67wxRAWcAAkizB.jpg
CYX7-z1W8AMOWzG.jpg
EVTebVzXQAAXXh5.jpg
5681865f0b96a859481c14aefc488192.jpg
Smith Island with and without dome.jpg

Anonymous
No.151663
151682 151692
829ee75cebdea14af0b6cd407a1fdcd4562e9527f135b7d352a91a1757dff3fb.png
I stuck my head down the flat-earth rabbit-hole once. Just once. Now I can't unsee the fisheye lenses in space footage.

3/10 fun the first few times but now it's just depressing.
Anonymous
No.151682
>>151663
Fish eye lenses are used to maximize field of vision rather than focus on one particular spot. They tend to be used in space applications because you want to see as much of your space station or craft as possible.
Anonymous
No.151692
16ddf45676f4fa8326cd8fa19eed8e94.jpg
>>151663
>pic
Anonymous
No.151693
index.jpeg
>>150294
The video is gone.
Well, that was expected.
Anonymous
No.151694
EKz7PAsVAAEnM33.jpg

Anonymous
No.151702
>>149108
These memes reek of manipulation. Especially the last one. It should read “my face when”, not “your face when”. I don’t know if these are especially made by agencies paid to optimally stupidize the US population and accelerate their decline (to facilitate the Chinese taking over the Empire, for example), or whether it’s just how the egregore works, but this is suspicious.
Anonymous
No.151703
151830
>>149113
We do feel the centrifugal force of the Earth’s rotation. Its pull upwards is what makes your measured weight on the equator be about 300g less than your actual mass.
Anonymous
No.151810
151813
File (hide): 977E0931745B3C6B954CD6E505381AF6-9893165.mp4 (9.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:05:29, Eric Dubay Daylight Debunks The Globe.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Eric Dubay Daylight Debunks The Globe.mp4
Eric Dubay: Daylight Debunks The Globe.
https://t.me/FE_Nederland/550
Anonymous
No.151811
151812
Spoilered
>pic related is one of the things flat earthtards fear
Anonymous
No.151812
8451.png
>>151811
Do a Ctrl+F and search this thread for Nikon P900 and P1000, then THOSE ARE what round earthers really fear.
Anonymous
No.151813
tra.jpeg
35.png
>>151810
I found mirrors and transcript.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Daylight-Debunks-the-Globe:0
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cAXhB26Bx1ls/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mkrgeqFDQVpq/
Anonymous
No.151830
>>151703
>Earth’s rotation
I would love to hear from where you are taking your info.
Anonymous
No.152207
File (hide): 4B3A91DD1BCC5C81616C173A596764A4-1566182.mp4 (1.5 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:00, Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!.mp4
Flat Earth in 60 Seconds!
Anonymous
No.152214
maxresdefault.jpg
>Outer Space isn't a Place - It's a Lie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqzlQPlCv44
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lVWexiQzU43l/
Anonymous
No.152392
4158.png
4040.png
>Flat Earth: Spacex credibility disappears lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvRMQx6GQ_0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/H931aEbu1Cq8/
CGI fails.
Anonymous
No.152451
152453
The Earth can't possibly be flat because if it were all the cats in the world would have pushed everything and everyone over the edge by now!
Anonymous
No.152453
>>152451
Cats can't, the edge is 150 feet high.
Anonymous
No.152559
158157
maxresdefault.jpg
4755.png
5436.png
5630.png
>Is Theoretical Physics Actually Pseudo-Science? - (9:01 long)
>Michio Kaku and the pseudo-science that is modern-day 'theoretical physics.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhaegEh6Cg8
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BoIhdNLpzFMN/
Spoiler: It's a pile of crap that can't pass the scientific method test.
Anonymous
No.153052
File (hide): 7F6EABAFEC9675FB0EF5DA3A9CD029F6-1995410.mp4 (1.9 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:47, NASA LIES...AGAIN-1.mp4) [play once] [loop]
NASA LIES...AGAIN-1.mp4
NASA lies.
Anonymous
No.153075
maxresdefault.jpg
>TOP 10 Reasons Why I Don't Trust NASA
>This video shows enough evidence as to why you should no longer trust NASA or any other space agency and at the very least encourage you to DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eQxHPI86Nw
Anonymous
No.153076
flat earth 1.png
flat earth 2.png
flat earth 3.png
flat earth 4.png
flat earth 5.png

Anonymous
No.153082
215421.png
15455.png
15625.png
>Is Antarctica The Key To Flat Earth?
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=5db8b0422616150016b26a2d
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@True_World:f/Flat-Earth-NASA-Op-Fish-Bowl-Perfectly-by-Greg-Reese-Plocha-Zeme-NASA-Op-Fish-Bowl-opet-Perfektne-od-Grega-Reese:b
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PhsioRlRJrQE/
Short, straight to the point, and well done.
Anonymous
No.153227
File (hide): 391B028294D2FBF982F5E4E14283FF47-4170805.mp4 (4.0 MB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:03:03, Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession!.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession!.mp4
Stanley Kubrick's Deathbed Confession.
Moon landings are a fraud.
Anonymous
No.153248
File (hide): FF10DDF1894642FE5D73875CA096B2F4-2005859.webm (1.9 MB, Resolution:602x360 Length:00:00:51, Cartoon Truth.webm) [play once] [loop]
Cartoon Truth.webm
Cartoon Truth about the fake moon landing.
Anonymous
No.153839
153844
https://youtu.be/AQl8h7Aa75s
Anonymous
No.153844
153850
85260322.jpg
>>153839
Already posted. See >>150392
Anonymous
No.153847
153849
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/347942388

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/347946487
Anonymous
No.153849
85260318.jpg
>>153847
>CIA & international spying gossip
This has nothing to do with Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.153850
153851
>>153844
My apologies. Pleade allow timr for me to review the 'completion' vids.
While Im doing that, since youre familiar with the youtube channel, would you care to address the numerous additional videos that refute flat earth theory?
For clarification, the challenge is NOT to 'watch this guys whole videos and respond to everything', the challenge is to address the additional concerns, starting here:
https://youtu.be/KyD8VIK032o
And yes, this will be a sequence of inquiries. Im trying to skeptically weigh arguments from both sides. (You) are welcome to decline.
Anonymous
No.153851
153852 153853
82045e975.png
>>153850
If you can proof you live on a ball I will be satisfied.
Anonymous
No.153852
>>153851
You've rejected all of the proof given.
What would it actually take to prove it to you? What's your standard of evidence?
Anonymous
No.153853
153854 153903
>>153851
Well, lets be specific about what you feel constitutes proof.
Lets start with the moon.
Please explain the moon.
Anonymous
No.153854
153855 153899 153902
calculating.gif
>>153853
The parameters are set, according to Freemasons our realm is round, however real experiments (not CGI, photoshop and tall tales) debunk that.
So, applying real science, (((governments))) and their bought scientists' accounts don't hold water.
Interesting, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.153855
153856
>>153854
Okay, then what would hold water to you? What would it take?
Anonymous
No.153856
153858 154733 157951
this-experiment-is-an-example-of-hypothesis-based-science-3.jpg
>>153855
>what would hold water to you?
To pass the Scientific Method.
Please, research moar fren; your question denotes that you are ill prepared to understand how science works.
Anonymous
No.153858
153862
>>153856
What sort of research are you looking for?
Anonymous
No.153862
153899
>>153858
Not me, but you.
It is (you) who doesn't see the BS before your eyes because you are relying on faith in perceived "scientist priests" and government propaganda instead scientific analytical thinking.
Anonymous
No.153899
>>153862
>>153854
Very Arrogant, Very Cringe
Anonymous
No.153902
>>153854
I saaaaaaaid, explain the Moon
Anonymous
No.153903
153904 153944
aff46et56rtye54we.jpg
>>153853
This is getting tiresome. The whole thread is filled with proof.
Anonymous
No.153904
154733
>>153903
Youve got two statements about the moon landing, and what? Idgaf about the landings, I want you to explain what the fuck the moon is using flat earth and or dome theory.
Heres the rub. Your cutesy rhetorical 'proofs' dont measure up to a flat earth. I could conceive of the 'shard of a larger planet' theory, but the curvature of the planet is so easily proven through a variety of basic and complicated tests (and the results are repeatable and correspond to one another while operating individually), that to claim it is flat you would have to be quite ignorant, taking the piss, or you cant think rationally.
Since (you) are seemingly the only anon who gives this theory any weight Im addressing you.
Now then. You are aware that constellations are a thing, yes? Do you honestly think its some kind of projected or artifical aspect of a dome? If so, show me a astronomic chart by which you can track the movement of the constellations. If the flat earth were true, the constellations would be visible going NOT in a straight line, but would meander in order to be visible over the various areas it is claimed based on the flat earth map, and would diverge from the directional positions they are observed from.
Or, for simplicity's sake, explain the moon.
For extra credit, please use these charts to indicate when the next lunar eclipse is going to happen.
Because the funny thing about astronomical charts is you CAN accuratrly predict down to the minute (Im sure more sophisticated anons can be even more precise) when historical and future eclipses (not exclusively) will occurr.
Additionally theres this thing called tides, magnetic fields, as well as seasons, and all the rest. The thing about science is its based on findings rather than an individual's agreement with the theory for whatever reason. A scientist is tasked with trying to DISPROVE their pet theory and only after they exhaustively fail to do so do they present their findings to the critical analysis of other scientists, who then take it upon themselves to rigorously vet the experiments, the findings, and the validity of the theory.
The few videos of what has been posted that I HAVE watched are easily refuted and debunked (like the horizon laser experiment), so no Im not going to bother reading/watching everything. Back to the challenge:
Tl;dr Explain anything about the moon using flat earth models, and Ill be happy to show you how absurd those explanations are
Anonymous
No.153944
>>153903
>"Proofs"
Sure Buddy, BTW whats your IQ? Asking for a Friend.
Anonymous
No.154391
154734
Heliocentrism Modern Day Sun Worship Masquerading as a Science.mp4
Heliocentrism Modern Day Sun Worship Masquerading as a Science.
Anonymous
No.154733
162586
>>153856
>>153904
I don't really know if the earth is flat or not (as in I cannot prove either way), but I have to say that I don't really like your science, well maybe not woreship, but naive and idealistic view of the scientific world.

The reality is that we live in a world were egalitarinism is preached, which includes scientists that improve their careers to find "poofs" of this. Of course, there are those scientist that speak out about this but they are either shunned by the rest of the "scientific community" I'm sorry but I can't help but to think how community and objectivity seems, to me, naturally at odds with each other. Woman are liars and they are that way to fit in into communities. It seems clear that a society based around objectivity and truth would suffer from being mesh into one. or, it it's possible, removed from their former post.

Point is that I would put no faith in their integrity at all. They have lied before, so I shouldn't be suprized if they do so again.

This also doubles down in the favour of the flat earthers' camp. I haven't picked a side yet since it would only be for show anyway since I don't feel confident that I know enough about the issue to prove whatever conclusion I might reach but my point is that just like how flat earthers point to the idea that the earth is round; which, when you look at the horizon, is the most intuitive thought, the same can be said about bio essentialism. When we look at a nigger and compare him to a white man, the unbiased mind automatically assumes that just how their outside appearence is different so must their insides be. Obviously, ranging in degrees but that's the intuitive thought. But people have been made into liars because of the fear of being called racist. This forces them to claim that the emperor is nude.

I'm not saying that they are obviously the same but I'd liked to point out the similarity.
Anonymous
No.154734
>>154391
Just because the earth revolves around the sun doesn't mean that you have to worship the sun. That's nonsense.
Anonymous
No.155609
File (hide): 6CB3276771EE0A6444A0E46966205A45-550350.mp4 (537.5 KB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:18, nog.mp4) [play once] [loop]
nog.mp4

Anonymous
No.155626
155728
IMG_0085.PNG
After looking into OP claim the world is flat, I now believe the earth is definitely flat
Anonymous
No.155728
pinkie pie - welcome to the herd.png
>>155626
Welcome.
Anonymous
No.155834
165445
File (hide): 65478800309277B5B82D11FB1E538C72-4771105.mp4 (4.6 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:12, How far is Arcturus.mp4) [play once] [loop]
How far is Arcturus.mp4
How far is Arcturus?
Anonymous
No.156620
156622 156630
This Is What A REAL Satellite REALLY Looks Like... No CGI Required.mp4
>>149600
>What about satellites?
Satellites are actually balloons.
Anonymous
No.156622
156624
>>156620
Be a good lad and calculate when the next solar or lunar eclipse will be, using a flat earth model
Anonymous
No.156624
156625
>>156622
No idea, but it is sufficient to know that there is no curve, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then... the whole astronomy building falls catastrophically. It is all a big hoax.
Anonymous
No.156625
156627
>>156624
And how do (you) know there is no curve? Are you any pf thes3 vodeographers who have condicted an experiment and can reproduce the results such that a knowledgeable person could observe the experiment without finding fault in it?
Anonymous
No.156626
Pssst, without evidence its not knowledge, its personal conviction.
Anonymous
No.156627
>>156625
>And how do (you) know there is no curve?
I definitely can ask exactly the same question and with the same argument about "authority".
And how do (you) know there is a curve?
Anonymous
No.156628
156629 156632
Im throwing you a bone here.
Flat earth proponents LOVE to push the 'conduct your own experiments' meme, and when (you) are ready to present your own findings, Ill be happy to give them the consoderation they deserve.
Bit you're not, you're presenting (very flawed) videos and articles from other people, and effectivrly acknowledging 'well, none of the flat earth models actually WORK with the solar system, but its enough to 'know' the earth is flat.
I mean, look at this guy here.
https://youtu.be/YaPa4esJJx4
I wont say his experiment is flawless, and I acknowledge that allows for the shard-earth theory which I further acknowledge the possibikity of given certain pieces of information that I have recently come into possession of.
But, while I acknowledge that the shard theory is not impossible, Im not promoting it.
(You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
Oh, speaking of standing, apparently gravity isnt a thing to flat earthers? Apparently we're being held against the earth by inertia of effectively a giant elevator?
>How is this possible
<Idk but that doesnt mean its wrong
Thats 'God of the Gaps'tier
>inb4 gaytheist talking points
Not an Atheist, bit there is an easy correlation to be drawn between the inability to rationally conceptualize an alternative that fits somehow excuses an otherwise laughable stance on the subject.
If any of the flat earth material were viable, you would be able to take that 3vidence and then apply it to another observable phenomenon, and tbey would be interconnected and play off each other; there isnt one set of observable physical phenomena one minute and a totally other set a few miles away. You should be able to say 'if this part of flat earth is true, then that would translate to this area, where we can see if the same observable phenomena occurs in a different context.'
Lather, rinse, repeat.
Anonymous
No.156629
>>156628
>I mean, look at this guy here.
>misdirection
In this bread there is plenty of information and proof to put the heliocentrism cult to rest for eternity.
Anonymous
No.156630
>>156620
>First off, (you)'re the one promoting the theory, the burden of proof is on you. But since I have a handle on things and can argue a point without logical fallacies and defensive deflection,....
Because sundials are a thing, amd they produce the same results no matter where on the planet you are. Additionally, round is a fundamental property of matter, as it is at a point of equilibrium when operating in a pressurized system. This is why tiny droplets of water bead, among many other observable phenomenon.
>but water gets flat on a plate
Yes, because it has reached a resting state, being acted on only by gravity and minimal air pressure.
The sphere is observable in all structures beginning with cells and microbes (Id suggest atoms too, but I havent seen it with my own eyes) and is a fundamental form of matter, plasma, and electromagnetism. Ever studied a magnetic field? They're easily observable with metal filings (unless,... the metal filings are in on the deception)
Anonymous
No.156632
156633 156634 156635
>>156628
>You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
You lie like a kike.
The breads speaks for itself. Laser experiments on water demonstrate without any doubts that there's no curve.
Read the whole bread of GTFO.
Anonymous
No.156633
156636
>>156632
Those laser experiments are flawed AND not reproduced. Try again.
Anonymous
No.156634
>>156632
Wait a second
Anonymous
No.156635
156636
>>156632
>You lie like a kike.

I REALLY hope you have some evid3nce for that claim. Please put it forward. Where and how have I lied.
Anonymous
No.156636
156637
>>156633
>Those laser experiments are flawed AND not reproduced.
How so? I'm interested, HOW they are flawed.

>>156635
>Where and how have I lied.
You said, quote:
>You) however are promoting Flat Earth, which from the rhetorical and problematic (from a logical standpoint) 'sources' doesnt have any legs to stand on.
From a logical standpoint no source need any approval from the heliocentric "priest" funded by (((governments))). You call "problematic sources" to anyone not licensed by the priests to investigate on the established pseudo science. Therefore it is (you) who resort to fallacies to support the round earth.
Anonymous
No.156637
156638
>>156636
>flaws
Fo one, theyre being conducted on a boat, on the water.
Now I dont know if you know about natural bodies of water, but Ill clue you in.
There is no such thing as a resting state. Ergo, you will never be operating from a level and stable platform. With the distances involved the most miniscule change in angle will produce results where the error threshold renders the results inconclusive AT BEST.
>priests
>licenses
So not what I said, thanks for proving who the liar.
When I say authority, I dont mean (((authority))) I mean a person who has an experiential wealth of knowledge about the subject and its experiments, who is credible in determining errors. I am not an authority, and yet I can already refute most of the assertions presented.
If a layman can do that to most of the evidence, how can you claim to have a leg to stand on?
Pick a video or article, and I will walk you through it and point out the errors. When I cant, Ill admit it. Deal? Pick your favorite.
Anonymous
No.156638
156639 156641
>>156637
>I dont mean (((authority))) I mean a person who has an experiential wealth of knowledge about the subject and its experiments, who is credible in determining errors.
I qualify to determine that.
I have a background in mechanical engineering.
Anonymous
No.156639
156640
>>156638
So do I
Anonymous
No.156640
156642 156644
>>156639
Great. Would you like to demolish the trigonometry associated with a boat balancing on a lake while projecting a laser beam over the horizon? Huh?
Anonymous
No.156641
>>156638
Also, you dont strike me as credible; your bias is toward conviction, whereas my bias is toward skeptical analysis. Again, I point to the planetary shard theory (which still has flaws, but one mustnt throw the baby out with the bath water,... you know, like you lot do).
And even if you didnt have such a boas, you would need to be present at the experiment in order to effectively error-correct.
The best a person with any understanding could conclude from the laser experiment is that it is inconclusive and needing further experimentation.
Its not a one and done anon. Youre not pushing a theory, because you dont have the evidence to justify the theory. You're pushing an ideology
>but, so are you!
Yes. I promotr by my skepticism the idea that if tjis were true, it would be overwhelmingly apparent by way of simple experiments; the inverse is true.
Anonymous
No.156642
>>156640
Knock yourself out, Ill get my popcorn
Anonymous
No.156644
>>156640
>Also, you dont strike me as credible; your bias is toward conviction, whereas my bias is toward skeptical analysis.
My bias is toward MATH. It doesn't add up. Simple trigonometry says there is no curve, and this is the reason why no NASA priest will ever debate a flat earther, again, it is because math doesn't lie.
Anonymous
No.156645
156647
See post >>149142 and end this pointless debate and hollow rhetoric.
Either you grasp math or you don't. If not, then keep silence and learn, faggot.
Anonymous
No.156646
idiocracy-movie.jpg
Also see post >>149168 for a refresher on the supposedly curvature, which doesn't exist when you look for it.
I don't know about American education, but most middle school students in most countries can understand trigonometry and use a simple calculator to reach this obvious conclusion.
Anonymous
No.156647
156648
>>156645
Thank you for those lovely diagrams. Now be a good little boy and run the numbers, analyze them, and then conduct experiments to validate the hypothesis; Ill be happy to show you where the errors are.
Anonymous
No.156648
156650
7tt5d70b.png
>>156647
>Ill be happy to show you where the errors are.
This is great and I'm glad to have you here, please go ahead, begin from the top of this bread and inspect the experiments shown.
Lighten this thread with your expertise.
Anonymous
No.156649
156651
https://youtu.be/GT7nmvjXC4U
It should be readily apparent that Im not trying to refute flat earth as a whole, thats an exercise in futility for the reasons neatly summarized in this video.
Im challenging you (not for the first time) to validate your own claims, and the certainty you assert.
My hypothesis is that when we get down to the details, I can tear your hypotheses/conclusions to pieces.
Anonymous
No.156650
>>156648
Ill reiterate. The burden of proof is on you. So, show your proof. Or, show where you have taken the results of others and applied them.cohesively, Ill settle for that.
Anonymous
No.156651
156652
1cd0.png
>>156649
>according to the Flat-Earth society
It has been established in this thread more than twice that such a "society" is a freemason controlled opposition tasked with to ridiculize flat earth. Obama, Clinton and many more golems used to mention the Flat-Earth Society to scare away the normies from the truth.
And since you mention it, it is clear that you are not arguing in good faith because or you didn't properly read this bread, or if you did, you are throwing libels without care.
Anonymous
No.156652
156653
>>156651
You misunderstand, yet again.
Im not presenting that video because I beli3ve the findings, Im presenting them as counter-point.
You seem to think you can simply post videos and that anyone who doesnt get it os in some way predosposed to opposing the idea, as opposed to seeing that there is two sides to an argument, and for every video or article that you claim 'proves' flat earth, ai can produce 3 tbat destory those videos.
Which is why Im challenging you to provide your own findings, self-derived or built off someone else's findings, that I can analyze.
Anonymous
No.156653
156654
circularreasoning2.jpg
12eb40b6822a90dd639f10c635de1138.jpg
>>156652
Okay.
Anonymous
No.156654
>>156653
The only conclusion I began from is, if there was any validity to the flat earth hypothesis, there would be cross-industrial cohesiveness to the findings.
Versus you, who is the one literally and figuratively using circular reasoning.
Anonymous
No.156655
Ill give you an example from personal experience.
I used to live 20 miles north of Sacramento, CA. In the roght weather conditions, you can see Sac from there, 20 miles away. This should not be possible if using a spherical globe model.
But its not as cut and dried as >8 miles onjects = flat earth. Upon furtner investigation, you find that the Sac valley has a gradual geological slope, with areas of Sac AT sea level.
The appearance debunking is due to various factors being neglected in the experiment. Now, Im not suggesting that the errors in flat earth videos and articles are making errors as glaring as thoae, but that doesnt mean there werent errors. And untill the experiments have been exhaustively conducted with various individuals producing comparable results, all you have is unverified claims and personal conviction.
In my example, I would literally be looking at a city too far away to perceive, and if I so concluded without asking someone ELSE if these findings are valid, I would be concluding/arguing equally (though obviously more egregious) unvalidated claims and personal conviction.
You're entitled to your theories as theories, but you are not entitled to promote unvalidation and conviction as fact, not without redress. I dont want to argue people or positions or any of that, I want to.see the exhaustove data points and results. A theory is not made true by conviction, it is observed to be true in the face of incontravertable evidence.
>I did a weird experiment that didnt produce the results the 'globe head' model says it should therefore flat earth. No, I cant share all my data, but heres a couple measurements
is anything but incontravertable
Anonymous
No.156657
156660
The only explanation I could work out of how the earth could be flat would be if the entire 'planet' was perched on the nose of an alien(or whatever) spacecraft, but oh wait would mean space exists.
I maintain the perception that the shard earth is plausible, but that theres no actionable body of evidence the flat earth is.
Also
>satellites are balloons
You do know they still use weather balloons right? Like, theyre way cheaper for data collection than satellites. Seeing a balloon (maybe) and a guy saying 'what is that', and then make the extraordinary leap to say that all satellites are balloons is technically not deserving to be justified with a response, but I will cuz I like you.
So, Ill take a note from the Rittenhouse defense when I say:
Hocus pocus, out of focus.
Anonymous
No.156660
156661
>>156657
>Seeing a balloon (maybe) and a guy saying 'what is that', and then make the extraordinary leap to say that all satellites are balloons is technically not deserving to be justified with a response, but I will cuz I like you.
We are told that there are thousands of satellites and assorted space junk orbiting this supposedly planet, it is natural to expect that some of them regularly will pass in front of the moon and be seen, but this is not the case at all. This is a very peculiar detail. Just saying.
Anonymous
No.156661
156668
>>156660
Zero doubt. It has been alleged that if one isnt oriented directly at the planet from space and look to the sides, there's a veritable fid of outside-the-atmpsphere depris, in something of a layer.

Which makes it increasingly dubious to attempt to credibly assert that satellites are balloons.
Anonymous
No.156664
*field
*credibly assert FROM ONE INCONCLUSIVE, OUT-OF-FOCUS VIDEO OF 'SOMETHING', that satellites are balloons.
Anonymous
No.156668
156673
sunrise-balloon.jpg
Project Loon Crash in Brazil.jpg
>>156661
>*credibly assert FROM ONE INCONCLUSIVE, OUT-OF-FOCUS VIDEO OF 'SOMETHING', that satellites are balloons.
Since there is not proof of the existence of space beyond CGI and freemason tall tales, but there is hard photographic evidence indeed of artifacts resembling satellites illustrations hanging from balloons, I'm inclined to trust my eyes and not the usual liars.
By the way, notice that Flat-Earthers base their conclusions on direct observations plus experiments, on the other hoof, round-earthers base theirs in just CGI plus faith on "licensed scientists" on a payroll.
Anonymous
No.156673
156675 156676
>>156668
>literally posts corroboration of balloons
>round-earthers base their positions on cgi n shit
An unsurprisingly ignorant assessment. I think Ive done my due diligence in illustrating that you wont present your own findings for review, but are content to promote an ideology that you cant answer the most basic questions of, and are therefore an idealogue for.
(read: a shill)
>inb4 n n no, you are!
Its not shilling to ask for evidence. Consistent, corroborated evidence, not a one and done. Its not shilling to observe that a claimant who refuses to do so and delegates to other unassociated youtube videos the responsibility to prove his point.

This is YOUR point, after all. You're the one shilling flat earth, and anyone who disagrees is subject to a crazy mind virus by the masons that prevents even the most credible of researchers as 'doing it for the $'.
No, you dont get to produce flimsy evidence and then claim that youve done your part. The standard of evidence is way higher than whay you present, and all you have done is attempt to question various elements based off random people's videos which I again assert are easy refuted. Oh, and meanwhile, those random one off videos are easily refuted by more people conducting the same experiment, but with better controls than those you present.
>pic 2
Hocus pocus, more out of focus.
Anonymous
No.156675
>>156673
>literally posts corroboration of balloons
Yeah, because the are actually balloons. Any doubt?
Anonymous
No.156676
156686
b7d.gif
>>156673
>Its not shilling to ask for evidence.
Read this damn thread, then come back to apologize.
Anonymous
No.156686
>>156676
>read through all the ridiculous horsehsit I posted and then apologize
No. And if you're unwilling to skip all the bullshit and just post or reference or even link to the posts of allegedly actionable data, why would I waste my time sloughing through? Youve already made it readily apparent where your position is, and your conviction to it. Youve further claimed that the data is 'in there somewhere', but cant be arsed to present it, even though they're your posts and points. Its hilariously and cruelly ironic that you make all sorts of laims like 'circular reasoning' in response to these requests, and your defensiveness and deflection basically tells anyone obaerving what I have suspected but wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt about; you're an NPC.

But if you ever decide to cut the bullshit and focus on just presenting the data, Ill be here
Anonymous
No.156757
o_Awfully Irish Podcast. EXCERPT.- Flat Earth.mp4
>Awfully Irish Podcast. EXCERPT - Flat Earth
Stupidity has no bounds. When an imbecile throw pieces of information to sound smart without understand what she/he is talking about.
Anonymous
No.156758
>cherry-picked strawman
Anonymous
No.157183
FE 5.png
FE 4.png
FE 3.png
FE 2.png
FE 1.png

Anonymous
No.157196
157205 157221 157272
6332196.png
The one true cosmology.
Anonymous
No.157205
>>157196
I can't argue against that.
Anonymous
No.157221
my-little-pony-friendship-is-magic-brony-party-reasonably1.gif
>>157196
You win this round
Anonymous
No.157272
>>157196
Mother Earth Pony.
Anonymous
No.157273
d6swi1n-1fc01bea-f50c-476c-81bb-fbaa3bf9b436.png

Anonymous
No.157419
157473 164849 168419
Hitler_Flat_Earth.jpg

Anonymous
No.157473
164849
Flat_earth_Hitler.jpg
>>157419
Anonymous
No.157611
157613 157744
Hi. I have been tempted by this theory for a long time, but there is one empirical fact that does not seem to be explainable from the point of view of a flat Earth, and I can't allow myself to consider its plausibility it until this is resolved. I know this is a long thread and I haven't read most of it, but I searched for "midnight" and didn't find anything, so here goes my question.
Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole? The only justification I have found for this is that anyone who says there is such a phenomenon in the Southern hemisphere is lying. But if the flat Earth model is to be considered, it needs to address the facts, not hide from them.
I really like the idea of flat Earth and everything it entails. It makes the world look more interesting, I'm not going to lie. It's why I want to believe in it.
Anonymous
No.157613
157615 157744 157891
>>157611
>Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole? The only justification I have found for this is that anyone who says there is such a phenomenon in the Southern hemisphere is lying
There is a video provided by NASA showing the sun supposedly in the night with a clock on the upper corner of the screen to try to demonstrate that phenomena. The glaring problem for NASA is that that video is obviously edited, as the same clouds repeat themselves over and over again when compared them against the clock on screen. So the midnight sun is busted from the start.
I'm not sure if some of the long videos posted in this thread shows that, but if I find it again I will post it with the appropriate title.
Anonymous
No.157614
maxresdefault.jpg
>The Case for Flat Earth - by ODD TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8udts8Un4m4
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@ODDTV:b/the-case-for-flat-earth:2
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GuOVI5uSFu9G/
Anonymous
No.157615
157746 157891
>>157613
>There is a video provided by NASA
==And, what about the 30 days of night that Canadians, Alaskans, and Russians all experience?
Anonymous
No.157744
157745 157747 157891
maxresdefault.jpg
>>157611
>Why is there a "midnight Sun" in the South Pole?
>>157613
>There is a video provided by NASA
I found the video:

>Faking the 24 Hour Sun in Antarctica to debunk flat earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gsdHCcguqg
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/faking-the-24-hour-sun-in-antarctica-to:8
Anonymous
No.157745
157747
>>157744
>they used image compression in a sped up video = flat earth
Do you even understand the irony of the song in the soundtrack?
Anonymous
No.157746
2303.png
>>157615
>==And, what about the 30 days of night that Canadians, Alaskans, and Russians all experience?
I don't know about the north, I didn't research it yet, But perhaps the screenshot is related.
Anonymous
No.157747
157748 157754
Antarctica 24 hour sun Updated  WARNING -  The word S#!T is used..mp4
>>157745
My bad.
The second link of >>157744 is the right video.
Anonymous
No.157748
157749
>>157747
Okay. Ill acknowledge the video editing.
How do you jump from 'dodgy editing' to 'flat earth'?
Anonymous
No.157749
157750
>>157748
Sorry but if you cannot connect the most obvious dots, I'm not sure to be able to do it for you.
Anonymous
No.157750
157751
>>157749
>being this excited over shitty 'proofs' to act amug
I dont think you understand the standard of evidence. Probably why you're a flat earthrr.
Anonymous
No.157751
157752
>>157750
See >>148984
Anonymous
No.157752
157753
>>157751
>if petulent and inaccurate memes doesnt convince them, nothing will!
Anonymous
No.157753
864rws28.jpg
>>157752
>petulent
Anonymous
No.157754
157849
62827.png
>>157747
The video (5:02) of pastor Anderson shilling the globe is:
https://odysee.com/@BibleWayToHeaven:4/flat-earth-debunked-by:a
Anonymous
No.157767
File (hide): CE61B01456872F70CBCA8054F7609033-6550177.mp4 (6.2 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:41, 1EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1EDIT.mp4
Why Flat Earth Matters.
Anonymous
No.157808
157809
PVNRH0jbz7UV_640x360.jpg
>Fresh from today; Jan 6, 2022
>Lunar Eclipses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuKsMlANPxk
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@GLOBEBUSTERS:c/lunar-eclipses:a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PVNRH0jbz7UV/
RIP Global eclipse model - This video has fully debunked it.
Anonymous
No.157809
157811
>>157808
If that video passes as evidence for you, then you're more retarded than I thought
Anonymous
No.157811
157812
pinkie pie - ptffff.png
>>157809
It is exactly the same evidence presented by NASA and freemasons but tested against real experimentation.
NASA failed, your baseless shilling also failed. Watcha gonna do now?
Anonymous
No.157812
157814
>>157811
No one is shilling except for you.
You do realize that the size and location of the light source plays a role in how the eclipse is projected right? So, sticking a ball in front pf a light bulb is about the least credible of an experiment imaginable.
Anonymous
No.157814
157815
>>157812
Dear 57 IQ ape, it is not the distance, but the shape of the shadow.
Anonymous
No.157815
157816
>>157814
>cant tell that proportionate sizes has everything to do with the appearance of curvature over a vast and specific distance
Dunning Kreuger, ladies and gentlemen
Anonymous
No.157816
157817
popcorn.gif
>>157815
Try it yourself in your kitchen and let us see how it goes.
Anonymous
No.157817
157818
>>157816
My kitchen is not arranged precisely enough to conduct a credible experiment, and Im not so foolish as to think otherwise. I hope you're the same anon who claimed an engineering background, cuz then you would know what precise ratios and calculations are required to recreate a suitably detailrd model for which such an experiment would be credible. When milling, I deal with precise measurements in the microns. You know what happens if a person is off by just 2 microns? The whole thing falls apart. You're suggesting that an experiment that is off by inches will fly just fine though. Thats not how this works
Anonymous
No.157818
157819
>>157817
Do not misdirect attention to "precision" because in this case is irrelevant. It is about plain optics, or light propagation in other words.
Anonymous
No.157819
157820
>>157818
The earth is an alleged 150mil kilometers from the sun, and an alleged 405k km from the moon. Thats a ratio of 370 to 1. There needs to be 370x more distance betwern the light and the earth stand-in AND its size needs to be proportionate to the modeled moon size.
That you neglect to account for that makes your claims utterly ludicrous.
Anonymous
No.157820
157821
>>157819
The experiment is not about distances and proportions, but the shape of a shadow. Try it yourself lazy nigger, it is free.
Otherwise watch again the video as many times as necessary until you grasp the concept.
Anonymous
No.157821
157822
>>157820
Lets put this into perspective.
A properly ratio'd model would have say, 370' between the 'sun' and the 'earth', and ONE foot between the earth and the moon.
The SUN with a calculated diameter of 1.39mil km would need to have the diameter of about 6.5". The earth, with a calculated equatorial dimeter of ~12.75k would proportionately need to be about the size of a pea, and the moon would be about the size of a peppercorn, just 1' away.
That would A. be vastly more credible experiment.
Anonymous
No.157822
light-energy-7-728.jpeg
facehoof.png
>>157821
>distances and proportions again
What part of your brain is not working properly?
Anonymous
No.157823
157824
Lunar+Eclipse+Graphic.jpg
Heres that pic from the video.
Please note, the proportions are 6.5" diameter sun, then 370 feet, then a pea, then 1 foot, then a peppercorn.
A football field is 360' long. There is more than a football field between the sun and the earth, in this model.
Anonymous
No.157824
157825
>>157823
Okay.
Anonymous
No.157825
157827
>>157824
Playing shadow puppets with arbitrary sizes and distances will give you dodgy results, but the results are based on the infanti-level precision of the experiment. What Im saying is, that example doesnt in any way disprove the viability of eclipses, it only makes the videographer - and you - look foolish for presenting invalid findings as 'evidence'
Anonymous
No.157826
Again, Dunning Kreuger
Anonymous
No.157827
157828
>>157825
On the contrary, it makes you look retarded. The quality of the experiment is exactly the same than the NASA one.
It looks like the problem it is in your mindset which only accept input from "authoritative" sources regardless of its validity. The brainwashing is strong in you.
Anonymous
No.157828
157829
>>157827
Thanks for confirming the 'legitimacy' of your 'engineering background'. You obviously dont actually work in engineering, because you would appreciate how inane you come across to someone who deals with extreme precision and calculation versus anything but, and how a layman can look at a thing and assume to comprehend it right before getting themselves and people around them killed.
Obviously thats not an argument, its an inference made by taking your entirely ass-backward method of approaching the experiment and applying it to someone in an industrial context.
Anonymous
No.157829
157830
>>157828
Your statement is based in faith, not science.
If you would have a engineering background, then you would recognize at once that NASA lies don't meet the scientific method and therefore they are null and void.
Anonymous
No.157830
157831
>>157829
Who's going off NASA? I tend to favor centuries of mathematicians who did the work.
Anonymous
No.157831
157833
>>157830
>I tend to favor centuries of mathematicians
Already dis-proven theoretical science.
Anonymous
No.157832
Let me be clear, NASA is full of shit. Im not talking about that.
Im talking about Copernicus and Galileo and so forth. Debunk THEM.
Anonymous
No.157833
157834
>>157831
>disproven
Citation needed
Anonymous
No.157834
157835
>>157833
You can begin with >>148613 and then the rest.
Anonymous
No.157835
>>157834
I get it now. Your tactic is to deflect and persist until the other person gives up, concedes under duress, or their head explodes from trying to comprehend how someone could be so oblivious to their own folly.
I already said, Im not pouring through hours and pages of the most irrational caricatures of intelligence, just to try and locate the bit that 'you feel' debunks them. Ive seen plenty of the videos youve posted, along with all the strawmans, to know what constitutes evidence in your eyes, and I havent seen anything that does as you describe; it is reasonable to conclude therefore that you are full of shit because the evidence - in spite of your conviction to it and refusal to critically analyze it - says the same.
Speaking of strawmen
https://youtu.be/x59uV541sLI
Anonymous
No.157836
157837
https://youtu.be/danYFxGnFxQ
Or heres another one
Debunk Calculus
Anonymous
No.157837
157838
>>157836
>Debunk Calculus
Calculus is good, what it is not good is the theory about gravitational forces which cannot be backed by the scientific method. Remember, there is a bunch of scientists priests, all paid by the same establishment, who tow the line of planets and the "Theory of Gravity" which cannot be proven to exist.
Anonymous
No.157838
157839
>>157837
>calculus is good
Then you might as well give up now, because calculus was invented to determine the sphereoid shape of the planet. That is its purpose.
It just so happens to correlate to vast swaths of other scientific constants, meaning that if they're wrong (including gravity) then calculus would not work.
Calculus disproves flat earth
Anonymous
No.157839
157840
eeeeeee.jpg
>>157838
>because calculus was invented to determine the sphereoid shape of the planet
>Calculus disproves flat earth
Preposterous.
According to history, Newton developed calculus at the same time than Leibniz, and the later was having none of the Newton's nonsense.
https://williameamon.com/?p=382
Anonymous
No.157840
157843
>>157839
The principle Newton was unable to describe was electromagnetism. C'mon now, this is basic.
Anonymous
No.157843
157845
>>157840
>electromagnetism
>basic
Want to dive into Aether?
Anonymous
No.157845
>>157843
Dependa on how you define aether
Anonymous
No.157848
157850 157967 158047
hqdefault.jpg
>The Greatest Laser Experiment In History - FECORE
>The greatest and most sophisticated laser experiment. In this video FECORE will show how this historic laser experiment was performed. Thank you for your consideration.
>FECORE is growing fast, our member base has doubled in the last 9 months and our staff of engineers has grown with very well qualified and educated individuals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsSanuUNygI
Spoiler alert: CURVATURE NOT FOUND
Anonymous
No.157849
98645132.jpg
>>157754
Some comments.
Anonymous
No.157850
157853
>>157848
Thats the one!
I agree that one raises further questions. In fact, I seem to recall having this conversation ITT previously. Anyway, if the earth were non-spherical, the experimental distances would be far greater and far more readily provable. For one I would have to look at the specific mandlebrot section for the planet in those areas (hungary and budapest, iirc). For two, even without calculating extreme ratios, you're suggesting that 'if the earth is flat' you could see any part of the planet if you went far enough away. Like, assuming the illumination is sufficient with the revolving sun and moon disk, if you traveled far enough perpendicular to the ground, you could see all continents?
Anonymous
No.157851
157854
Why didnt they have a length receiver? You know, so they could adjust the angle of the laser and derive corroborative angles and heights? You know, trigonometry?
Anonymous
No.157852
Like literally, that would be unassailable
Anonymous
No.157853
>>157850
See posts about perspective.
Anonymous
No.157854
157856
>>157851
You should email them and ask.
Anonymous
No.157856
157857
>>157854
Uhm, no, instead I will objectively conclude that the experiment has an insufficient sampling of data to corroborate and scale its results from, from which a hypothesis yhat WOULD lead one to proof of flat earth SCIENTIFICALLY. Like literally, just adjust/measure the angle of the laser, and record it. Thats all it would have taken.
Anonymous
No.157857
84651-filly.png
>>157856
Suit yourself.
Anonymous
No.157891
157897 157931
>>157615
I was asking about the South.
>>157613
>>157744
While I appreciate how NASA tells more lies than truths (as any official organism would), this is not enough of an argument for me. This is exactly the same as "debunking" psychic phenomena by demonstrating you can fake it with stage magic. It doesn't debunk anything. I'm afraid that's just a fallacy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jF349mX2lw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32YO4ku0xFQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUiw576aM00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eABjyxKDXE
Numerous people have been there and experienced what according to the flat Earth model should be impossible. Instead of calling everyone a liar, I'd like to see a flat Earth model that accounts for this phenomenon. That is the real scientific mindset. Adjust your hypotheses to your experience.
Anonymous
No.157892
157893 157897 157898
>>149965
That's how boomers were taught to "learn". It's the same mechanism at work behind the Q anon phenomenon. Herd mentality, heavy emotional investment, groupthink and above all projection so that faults in one's reasoning (or lack thereof) are perceived to belong to the other.
Honestly, at this point, after having given it the benefit of the doubt for 5 years (and I would still be willing to believe the Earth was a thoroid, if it stood up to scrutiny), I wouldn't be surprised if this whole thing was some kind of experiment on manipulation of the masses.
Now that I think about it, the parallels between Q anon and flat Earth are unsettling.
Anonymous
No.157893
157897
>>157892
Glad its not just me. There ARE interesting elements to the flat earth theory and SOME (minimally) of their findings are compelling. However, they are compelling in the sense of 'why did the readings come out that way', and the evidence does NOT point toward a flat earth, rather it suggests phenomenon locally occuring in thenexperiment that skews the results. That we're not allowed to "peer" review the experiments beyond being 'told' what they entail is likewise telling.
Anonymous
No.157897
157929
>>157891
>>157892
>>157893
Anons, if there is not a curvature then any further argument about Earth being a planet is useless.
Anonymous
No.157898
157920 157931
>>157892
>Now that I think about it, the parallels between Q anon and flat Earth are unsettling.
There is not comparison, Qanon relies on Mossad bullshit, on the other hand, the Flat Earth movement on direct observation and experimentation.
Anonymous
No.157920
157924
>>157898
>the Flat Earth movement on direct observation and experimentation
Do you have any peer reviewed sources?

Galileo was imprisonned, not because how argued that the Earth revolved around the sun but, because he didn't allow his scientific studies to be peer reviewed and slandered anyone who dared to question or criticize his theories (Because, you know, THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IS TO CONTINUOUSLY PERFORM THE EXPERIMENT UNTIL A FACT IS UNDENIABLY REACHED).
Anonymous
No.157924
157937 157958
File (hide): 11DC76FA8C66F9D54CE19F2B04773B02-18980888.mp4 (18.1 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:50, FLAT EARTH is not peer reviewed(1).mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH is not peer reviewed(1).mp4
>>157920
>Do you have any peer reviewed sources?
Flat Earth is not peer reviewed. There's a reason to it.
Anonymous
No.157929
157930
>>157897
Not really. I want to know why there is a midnight Sun in the Southern hemisphere. I'm alright with "debunking" whatever model, including the "globe model" and all its cosmology. I really can stretch my suspension of disbelief as far as logical consistency allows.
But give me an alternative that explains the empirical observations. How does a midnight Sun in the Sourthern hemisphere happen?
Anonymous
No.157930
157931
>>157929
>midnight Sun
And how you know that?
Anonymous
No.157931
157933
boomer-with-a-computer.jpg
>>157898
I was talking specifically about the memes. You can't deny they have the same flavor to them.
>very crude humor based in middle school finger-pointing and ridiculing
>appeals to emotion and peer pressure
>boomer-tier meme crafting skills
>>157930
I don't. Everything I "know" about almost anything (even most of the time I experience it directly) is based in conjecture and logic. Are all these videos fake and their posters liars? Can you prove it? >>157891
There are many, many such videos by civilian researchers who have been there and recorded it. Hell, I might go there myself and in many a flat Earther's mind I would become a Mason, a liar and a conspirator.

How many videos disproving the midnight Sun in Antartica in-situ are there?
Anonymous
No.157933
157935
>>157931
>There are many, many such videos by civilian researchers who have been there and recorded it
Ahem.
You kidding, right? Anyone going there is on a payroll and bounded by legal coercion. No independent access is allowed.
Anonymous
No.157935
157936
>>157933
It's expensive as fuck, but I hope to one day do it.
https://www.adventure-life.com/antarctica

I'm going to stop posting on this thread now.
Anonymous
No.157936
>>157935
I know that grift and read the contract the passengers have to sign before jump on board. Spoiler, those small ships only visit pre-determined outer islands and never reach the antarctic wall. Also the voyages leaving Usuhaia (Argentina) are in peak summer, or January in the South.
Anonymous
No.157937
157939
>>157924
>Flat earth is not peer reviewed. There's a reason to it.
A reason, yes. Reason, no. This is why the flat earth is utterly incredible. Peer review is where other scientists and practitioners get to recreate the experiment to attempt to find flaw in it, to exhaust whether there is any refutation. Flat earthers dont know the first thing about controls in experimentation, which is why they cant (and have stopped trying 'for a reason') submitting for peer review.
>There are no peers for new ideas
Good quote, I used to have that posted over my bedframe as a child. Like many things, it can be distorted from the idea that 'having a new idea makes you the frontrunner', to 'having a new idea makes it unassailable, and the idea man is now the expert'. Thats childish thinking anon.
Anonymous
No.157939
>>157937
Any scientistute on a payroll can recreate the experiments disproving the curvature of Earth, but they won't because they will be destroyed for even to consider such a heresy to the establishment's faith.
Did you even read this thread? Because it looks like you have no clue about what had been already posted.
Anonymous
No.157940
157943
https://youtu.be/hVWiJgh5nzI
Quick rundown
Anonymous
No.157943
157947
wondering.png
>>157940
>gaslighting 101
>You are not seeing what you are seeing
>You are delusional
Okay, beyond the shilling and character assassination, can you prove the existence of a curvature and space? Or is this all you have left?
Anonymous
No.157947
157948
>>157943
What would constitute proof, in your opinion?
Anonymous
No.157948
157949
>>157947
I can't make your case for you.
Anonymous
No.157949
157951
>>157948
How is illustrating what evidence you would find 'satisfactory' "making my case"?
Anonymous
No.157951
157954
>>157949
Okay, let us repeat the cycle: >>153856
Anonymous
No.157954
157955
>>157951
So in summary
>Flat earthers dont do peer review cuz reasons
>Youll accept evidence that passes the scientific method, which includes peer review
Ergo, you admit that Flat earth claims - which are not peer reviewed - do not pass the acceptable threshold of evidence.
Anonymous
No.157955
157957
>>157954
Nope.
NASA heliocentric claims, on which you base your whole faith, fail the scientific method.
This thread is a monument to the truth and your hollow shilling a disgrace.
Anonymous
No.157956
157958
The whole point of peer review is so that other credible (read: experienced in the field) professionals can disprove or prove a theory's validity! It is equally about making sure the person(s) conducting the experiment didnt fuck anything up so that the findings can be validated. If flat earth theories ARE valid, where is the hesitation to publish? Let me guess, cuz masons.
Anonymous
No.157957
>>157955
To be cursed by the devil is truly to be blessed -Unknown
Anonymous
No.157958
157959
>>157956
Just dropping by?
See >>157924
Anonymous
No.157959
157962
>>157958
Im citing that video. You cant reject peer review, and then claim to allow (peer reviewed) scientific method evidence. Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings! That you dont comprehend that is evidence of how flimsy your premise is. Its not shilling to ask questions, nor is it shilling to observe the answers and 'evidence', find it laughably unsupportable, and then proceed to illustrate in a variety of ways how it is unsupportable.
It IS shilling to insist that one idea (yours) is correct without an overwhelming volume of evidence, including the peer review process.
Calculus. The only evidence you should need - that fulfills the criteria of peer review, an overwhelming volume of evidence, and universally congruent models - is Calculus. Somehow, I suspect you dont understand Calculus, because if you did we wouldnt be having this "conversation".
Anonymous
No.157961
157963
For those just tuning in, OP is operating under the premise that Scientific peer review is NOT
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be right, let me see. Hmmm, seems plausible. Let me conduct my own experiments and Ill report my findings
and is INSTEAD
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be allowed to get out, NASA and the masons and every religion have decreed the goyim must not know
And thats just the start!
Anonymous
No.157962
>>157959
>peer review
If the governments' scientists would step on firm science then many years ago they had debated nut flat earthers and put them in shame, but they didn't and won't.
What we see is silence from them and propagandists doing the speaking. It is very telling indeed.
>I'm citing that video
And by doing so, you are twisting
>Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings!
So? No NASA propagandist will try to deny the zoom experiments neither the laser ones; instead they do the same than you: to ignore the evidence and double down with the globe lie.
Anonymous
No.157963
157964 157969
>>157961
>For those just tuning in, OP is operating under the premise that Scientific peer review is NOT
By the way, NASA claims fail the scientific method. There is not a curvature to be seen.
Anonymous
No.157964
157965
>>157963
The 'evidence' for this claim is refused to be peer reviewed, but expects to be taken as credible.
Anonymous
No.157965
157966
09ea9.jpg
>>157964
Refused by who? When? How?
It is a fucking 1,000 dollars zoom camera a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to go to the shore and shoot a laser across the water a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to launch a camera in a balloon a refusal to be reviewed?
Any of the government employees wearing a lab coat can do that if instructed, but the won't do it. The means to disprove Flat Earth are easily available but they won't do it because they can't.
Anonymous
No.157966
157967
>>157965
What elevation was the laser and the receiver? What natural movement of the boat was caused by currents? Showing a video is not submitting for peer review. Peer review is where you identify EVERY TANGIBLE element to the experiment, document it, and indicate how the presence of each element DOESNT throw the results into astronomical (pun not intended) percentages of error. It is NOT
>Heres a video of us doing a thing. You guys claim it cant happen but we did it see?
Anonymous
No.157967
157968
>>157966
Lurk moar faggot.
>>157848
Anonymous
No.157968
157970 157971
>>157967
No u. That experiment doesnt prove shit. An observer cant test whether their measurements are accurate. The ONLY result one can 'conclude' is that more testing is needed.
Anonymous
No.157969
>>157963
>There is not a curvature to be seen.
Have you tried replicating the circumstances, and accounted for all the influential factors to prove that? All you would need is to build a model of the Earth in proportion to a Medigus microcamera (Assuming that it would represent a 5'6" person and build the rest of the model accordingly) and see how it would compare in viewing results on a flat Earth model and a round Earth model.
Anonymous
No.157970
>>157968
Which, funny enough, is EXACTLY WHAT THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS IS FOR
Anonymous
No.157971
ergae.png
>>157968
>No u. That experiment doesnt prove shit.
Suit yourself.
Anonymous
No.157972
157973
yufjvh.png

Anonymous
No.157973
>>157972
>ad hominem
Anonymous
No.157974
158021
775ADC97-727D-4DEC-B6AE-89F5FF355BCD.jpeg
I just had a brilliant idea, have any of you ever thought of making computer simulation models?

All the tools are already out there for free. You just need to download Blender, Unity, or Unreal; build your experiments in those environments to reflect all of the determining factors and showing the difference between the results of a flat Earth model and a round Earth model. Then, once you post your results, distribute the pack (With a checksum to validate it's originality) for others to try out the experiment in their own.

Hell, even if you're not accustom to those environments, you could still try it in mod-friendly games like Half-Life, Doom 3, and GTA.
The only actually cost is the time it takes to build the experiment.
Anonymous
No.157975
>more evidence
Vector Equilibrium
Anonymous
No.157976
157977
Let me explain why I feel the shard earth theory is plausible and the flat earth theory is not.
Understand, Nasa is full of shit.
Anonymous
No.157977
157978
>>157976
>phone buttons
Im coming at this with a professional engineering applied science (machining and fabrication of metal and lumber), AND a thoroughly tinfoil hat background. I refer to the interview between Credo Mutwa and David Icke on youtube. I find Credos story to be plausible, and the overa4ching story derived of that is that the planet experienced a cataclysm, and a giant chunk of the earth is missing. This would coincide with the passing of planet X on the 'anniversary' of the astrological alignment with the Giza plateau. Thats going to be the subject of the next post in thr History is a Lie thread, spoilers.
Anonymous
No.157978
>>157977
Checking my dubs.
That theory allows for the diminished curvature of the planet, while still allowing for spheroid geometry to work everywhere except the earth, as flat earth claims. The moon is a gravitational counter-weight to allow the earth to maintain a stable orbit, and thats also why we only see one side of the moon. Nazis did escape to space on spacecraft taught by the vril (nordics, theyre referred to), mars used to be fully inhabited, the solar system got fucked.
I dont contest history is a lie, Im saying flat earth is an unsatisfactory theory to explain errors in the official narrative
Anonymous
No.157979

Ergo, Antarctica is either a giant crater OR the border of what remains of a much larger planet that collided with the earth millennia ago, explaining the downfall from the heights of Atlantis, where we coexisted with countless alien races. They all watched it happen, and we are what is left of those who somehow survived
Anonymous
No.157980
158022
Excuse me, thats not accurate. Its the border of a much larger planet that WAS earth, that is now a smaller shard.
Anonymous
No.157981
But its not 'flat', thats absurd.
mic drop
Anonymous
No.157982
157983
Oh yeah
>Mars
Used to be fully inhabited by humans and other races, still is by multiple races with a small contingent of human 'ambassadors' as it were, became surface uninhabitable when the cataclysm threw off its previous orbit with earth
Anonymous
No.157983
157984 157985
>>157982
I havent been briefed or anything, I just worked it all out. Anyway, I guarantee all this shit is classified
Anonymous
No.157984
157988
>>157983
>I guarantee all this shit is classified
I've seen it for myself, it's all next to the classified documents about time traveling computers who have come to collect sperm samples of 21st century men and return to the 24th century because future humans have become sterile as a result of the moon colliding with the other end of our Earth shard and releasing all of it's radiation.
Anonymous
No.157985
>>157983
This is why the theory of evolution doesnt add up, this is why the control systems are in place to maintain ignorance in the masses and allow an elite class who literally control our every move (the masons ARE involved, Ill admit that). This is why media control, financial control, locational control. This is a prison-planet in that humanity cant leave, and certain factions of alirn do do crazy spoopy shit. They also aid those who properly ask, and metaphysics is the proper way.
Anonymous
No.157986
But the earth is not flat
Anonymous
No.157987
Consider the above rant the first 'official' summary-publication of my amalgamated tinfoil hat theory that includes and is corroborated by crater/shard-earth theory, and therefore isnt off topic lol
Anonymous
No.157988
>>157984
Hadnt heard that one, but it sounds plausible. Got any sauce before I dmor?
Also, the vaccine will have more to do with the sterilization of humanity than the planet strike, but yes there will be a planet strike
Anonymous
No.157989
157990
And now Ill do somethong flat earthers CANT do, Ill tell you why this matters.
Because its about to happen again. Planet x is still in its irregular yet stable orbit, and in the cosmic aftermath of its collision with the earth it now does a planetary flyby every 'so often', which explains the mud flood, and all the rest I will be going into in the history is a lie thread.
Anonymous
No.157990
>>157989
(it mightve been the moon that collided with the earth, one cant be certain it was planet x, but one could surmise that planet x was involved)
Anonymous
No.157991
157992
One might even go so far as to suggest that the moon is a hollowed out planetoid/spacecraft that used to orbit planet x but was deliberately positioned to collide with the earth, but that would be silly
Anonymous
No.157992
157993 157994
>>157991
>a hollowed out planetoid/spacecraft that used to orbit planet x but was deliberately positioned to collide with the earth, but that would be silly
Why? Humanity is the only species in the known universe that can saw off it's only leg, then immediately get back up and start running again. Not to mention the horniest fuckers in the galaxy. Who WOULDN'T want to annihilate us when we're the stuff of nightmares?
sage
sage
No.157993
82821062_152203802863448_6184856105714188288_n.jpg
>>157992
Obligatory.
Anonymous
No.157994
>>157992
We didnt use to be, thats the point. The inhabitants of planet x didnt just wreck the earth, they fucked with the dna of the surviving humans and established their genetic offspring as the de facto rulers of a now stone age earth, with humanity as a slave race
Anonymous
No.158021
158023
59f284fe4d4411e898730eb04a1bba78.jpg
>>157974
I have built solar system models for fun in Unity and OpenGL before (to the point at some point I realized I was replicating Orbiter, the simulator and decided to stop before I comitted to such a gargantuan project). But I love making simulations.
There is a flat Earth model simulation on Steam, but it's a joke.
I once saw an animation that portrayed the spiraling of the Sun and Moon over a flat Earth in a way that was realistic. I forgot what they're called, but there's these circular paper things that have rotating parts and map the trayectory of the Sun, the Moon and the stars over a whole year. That could be coded and expanded to make a flat Earth simulation.
However, in terms of optics, to account for the way we observe the atmosphere and whatnot, such a simulation would require insane (and possibly not yet fully known) things going on with difraction and distortion of light, atmospheric densities, etc.
A semi-realistic simulation. In contrast, the required mathematics and physics you need to know to begin implementing something like https://spaceengine.org/ are very basic in comparison. They complicate only as you ramp up realism and visual fidelity. And most important of all, what your simulation shows you matches perfectly with what you see when you look outside, from ground level, from a plane…, whatever.
>By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
LOL. I had not noticed this until now.
Anonymous
No.158022
158026
>>157980
Wouldn't such a shard collapse into a spheroid fairly quickly (in geological scale) due to its own gravity?
Anonymous
No.158023
158025
planisphere1.jpg
>>158021
Sorry for the triple post, but I just remembered. It's a planisphere. I once saw one like pic related with removable layers that showed the movement of the Sun and the Moon over the four seasons, and it accounted for things like eclipses, even.
But see, that's the thing. At its best, the flat Earth model is just a projection of observations made from a sphere into a circle.
And I say flat Earth is a projection from a sphere and not the inverse because so far flat Earth fails to account for a few key observations such as 24 h sunlight in Antartica, Moon image reversals, precession of the equinoxes or parallax in stars over extended periods of time without resorting to all-knowing all-powerful gaslighting conspirators or extremely complex physics and math gymnastics that involve new problems and contradictions with the existing model.
Anonymous
No.158025
158028
>>158023
>key observations such as 24 h sunlight in Antartica
For the time being it is only a myth as no independent witness can corroborate it.
Anonymous
No.158026
158027
>>158022
I guess? I imagine it would depend on how much was left and what that shape is, but I could also see the presence of the moon acting like a form of gravity field counter-balance to offset? Pure speculation
Anonymous
No.158027
>>158026
Gravity doesn't exist.
Anonymous
No.158028
158029 158039
>>158025
>For the time being it is only a myth as no independent witness can corroborate it.
>independent
See, the problem is that most flat earthers only accept their own experience there as "independent". They would sooner contemplate the idea of a family member who claimed such experience being a paid shill than considering they might be wrong.

Anyway, I found this video, which I think contains enough information to be implementable as an interactive 3D simulation. I'm getting really hard just thinking about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYv7gpFc_7o
Anonymous
No.158029
158030
4ac.png
>>158028
>See, the problem is that most flat earthers only accept their own experience there as "independent".
If the witness is on a masonic payroll and bounded by legal coercion, then it is not independent.
Anonymous
No.158030
158031
>>158029
And the criteria by which you know whether they are on a masonic payroll is whether they are against flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.158031
>>158030
>And the criteria...
For that you need to lurk moar. Redpilling is a process that cannot be hurried.
Anonymous
No.158032
158033
Screen Shot 2022-01-10 at 13.40.25.png
I've hit my first stumbling block trying to implement a flat Earth simulation.
In order for the terminator to be a straight line across all the meridians, the Sun light source would need to be placed at an infinite distance. Otherwise it's always curved. You can see it in the second gif in the OP. The surface on which that sun is shining has some sort of distortion. It's not flat (ironically).
Can someone point me to the measurements and distances proposed by the flat Earth theory? It would make implementing this much easier. Thanks.
Anonymous
No.158033
158034
>>158032
>flat Earth theory
Fact. The curvature is debunked.
Anonymous
No.158034
158035
>>158033
Can you point me to measurements and distances so I can implement a 3D model of the flat Earth correctly modeled please?
Anonymous
No.158035
>>158034
The most accurate one, to my knowledge, was posted in this thread month ago. Look for it.
Anonymous
No.158036
158037 158038
3506.png
It would be great if any glober could explain the following, it is damning at least for the scientists and academics on a payroll since this detail in the heliocentric model cannot escape their attention and only willing deception can explain their silence:

>Daylight Debunks the Globe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Daylight-Debunks-the-Globe:0
Anonymous
No.158037
158038
>>158036
You cant grasp how the slight extention of progress (4 minutes a day) translates to a 90 degree correction over a 3 month period?
Lets get real simple. 4 min/day x 365 days/year = 1460 accrued minutes per year. Mathematically, that means 24.33 hours per year.
But wait now, we're going quarterly. Okay, 6 hours per quarter.
Hmmm, 6 hours per 3 month period. 6 hours is - wait for it- the amount of time it takes to rotate 90 devrees.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Try again.
Anonymous
No.158038
I found a channel with a model that seems descriptive enough to implement as a 3D simulation. However, the mathematical hoops involved are absolutely insane. This is much more complicated than creating a 3D globular planetarium. And the guy has the gall to say that the globe is based on "mathematical impossibilities". What the actual fuck man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LREtlSGsCV0
>>158036
See >>158037
You can find many ways this is explained in the video comments:
>When the earth spins on its axis, it points back in the same direction every 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4.09 seconds. It then takes another 3 minutes and 55.51 seconds to point back at the sun. Humans chose 24 hours to be from noon to noon based on the sun, not based on the position of the stars.
>3:47 "how come no one else in the world before us ever discovered that the 24 hour day is incorrect by 4 minutes?"
>this isn't true, i can for certainty that the Romans knew about this as early and before Julius Caesar.
>the consuls used to have adjust Rome's calendar regularly.
>Julius Caesar wanted the process to no longer require Consul to perform, so he automated the process by simply adding the concept of the leap to the calendars
Anonymous
No.158039
158040
>>158028
Another problem with flat earthers - specifically the more delusional variety - is that there is often a lived sense of helplessness, that the thought "Ive been lied to" is very gratifying, as it allows them to 'break free' of their 'intellectual bondage'. The problem then becomes that their theory is juvenile in the least. As Ive ind8cated, I concur with OP that the planet is not a sphere, or if it is its a highly modified one. However, one model co forms with natural laws and ohenomenon, whereas the other attempts to throw out things that are so observably endemic that one wonders. This creates a double trap. They cant go back to the pure globe model, and theyre supporting a model that is quite unsupportable.
Then they have to realize that they emancipated themselves from one intellectual prison and into another one, which many people simply are either unable or unwilling to do.
Anonymous
No.158040
158041
1*RSF1S4bss3PfQP6YbL8V5A.jpeg
>>158039
>Then they have to realize that they emancipated themselves from one intellectual prison and into another one, which many people simply are either unable or unwilling to do.
That is an interesting observation. Not long ago I discussed with a friend how most people who "believe the Earth is round" do so because it is the consensus. They are, in fact, no different than most flat Earthers. They chose a consensus, usually by emotional attachment, and defend it as Truth when in reality it is Belief.
I think this crisis of truth and trust we are living in has the potential to emancipate a lot of us intellectually. To realize that as long as they are applicable to any part of empirical experience, models don't need to be exclusive. They illuminate part of Truth. And no model illuminates all of it anyway.
The problem lies in pretending any one model or map of reality is Truth, and is absolute. The Aquarian age is holocentric. That's why we're having crisis in which no dogma seems to be able to dominate, and it will be even more so in the decades to come. Only those able to transcend cognitive dissonance, duality and polarization will survive intellectually (and possibly spiritually). The rest will be forever NPCs stuck in the hells they themselves create.
Anonymous
No.158041
158045 158075
>>158040
It might just be semantics, but there appears to be an element of intellectual dishonesty to it. I freely admit I hve no first-hand evidence that the planet is any: sphere, shard, flat, pony. The confidence I have in the models I will argue (sphere/shard) is derived from their interconnectivity. Math constants lead to math constants, etc. Flat Earthers believe (as in conviction) and proclaim "This is debunked" when its not, "This is true" when the evidence doesnt aupport, and impugn the motives of anyone who argues against. And the sheer arrogance is baffling.
Anonymous
No.158045
158046
5fa204.jpg
>>158041
>Flat Earthers believe (as in conviction) and proclaim "This is debunked" when its not,
Let's go back to the very basics, if the curvature is not found, then the whole heliocentric theory falls in a spectacular fashion.
You can spin it any way you like, BUT, if there is no curve, then there are not any globe and space.
Anonymous
No.158046
158047
>>158045
Please, continue to display your ignorance of evidence.
Anonymous
No.158047
158053
>>158046
>evidence
Deny this >>157848
Anonymous
No.158048
158051 158276
1641613414149 (1).png
Refute THIS (protip: you can't)
Anonymous
No.158051
158052
>>158048
If that example is about the claim that the curvature can't be seen from the surface of the Earth because of its size, then let me take you to the very foundations of the globe lie and the beginning of this bread:
See >>149071 >>149168
Again, your post shows that you need to lurk moar.
Anonymous
No.158052
>>158051
It's about the claim that flat is justice, lmao.
Anonymous
No.158053
>>158047
Theres nothing to deny. More experimentation needed, I told you that.
Anonymous
No.158055
158057
>curvature
https://youtu.be/EQa4u_Xgy8Q
Start at about 41:00 to 45:00
See what I did there? I actually know what counts as evidence, and rather than demand you pour through shit, I focused on the tangible part. Thats what you do in an argument, instead of petulent demands and proclamations
Anonymous
No.158056
158057
1641681687191.gif
miaxc.jpg
And for more of the meta of Flat Earth
https://youtu.be/umo6pMCkcXs
>pics semi related, but more to get that shit off the homepage
Anonymous
No.158057
158058 158059
>>158055
>SciManDan
That NASA shill is famous, there are hundreds of videos from him and about him debunking and rebunking every topic. Worth to watch for entertainment purposes.
>>158056
I watched it a bit and is all about character assassination (optics) going so far as to call the opposition anti-semite. It is not serious and lacks of scientific arguments when the video creator has to resort to buzzing words.
Anonymous
No.158058
>>158057
So, you didnt watch the 4 minutes I specify,where you can see an ocean tanker halfway down the horizon?
Anonymous
No.158059
158060
>>158057
>that guy is a shill
Literal strawman ad hominem. Two for one. Bravo. Also, you never claim he's wrong, probably because he understands evidence and presents it
Anonymous
No.158060
158061
>>158059
>Also, you never claim he's wrong, probably because he understands evidence and presents it
There is something very interesting about SciManDan, for every video he releases debunking X, 2 or 3 counter-videos pop up to refute his claims. But it gets still more interesting when he launches a second one to "crash" the video responses and of course, more videos responding him show up. It never ends.
I stop watching them long ago because you will never know who really won the argument.
Anonymous
No.158061
158062 158069
>>158060
Thats a lovely exposition that in no way addressed the barges halfway down the horizon. Focus, nigger.
Anonymous
No.158062
>>158061
I watched a video debunking that video, but I can't find it.
Anonymous
No.158063
158065 158102 158109 159490 163700
Screenshot_20220111-073531_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220111-073539_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220111-073546_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220111-073630_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Since I KNOW youre dumb and stupid, heres the stills
Anonymous
No.158064
No, thats not redundant. Dumb historically referred to a person's intellectual capacity, while stupid refers to ignorance
Anonymous
No.158065
158066 163825
>>158063
>stills
That has to do with the vanishing point of perspective, nigger.
Anonymous
No.158066
>>158065
>stupid
As I said
Anonymous
No.158069
158070 158071
>>158061
We’ve managed so far to keep this thread to degenerate into name calling. That’s quite a feat for a flat Earth thread.
For all we know, the whole thing could be engineered to pit the goys against each other. Don’t fall for it. We are civilized spiritual beings.
Anonymous
No.158070
>>158069
*from degenerating
Anonymous
No.158071
>>158069
Thats not true at all, Ive been called many names thus far.
Anonymous
No.158075
158076
Untitled.png
>>158041
I have come across a very relevant reflection on this issue of knowing while reading The Ahrimanic Deception by Rudolf Steiner. This is not a coincidence.
Anonymous
No.158076
>>158075
Well, its more basic than that really. The opposite of Entropy is Faith.
Anonymous
No.158098
158099
maxresdefault.jpg
>7 Rockets Hitting The Dome or Firmament
>Video compilation of several rockets reaching the firmament above the Earth. We live in a sealed environment, we have never been to space.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rmDj1MJyaY
Anonymous
No.158099
1587116495-al-gore-south-park-1112.png
>>158098
Let me just clarify. You dont see anything wrong with that video, is that correct?
Anonymous
No.158100
158101
Screenshot_20220114-035238_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220114-035258_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220114-035334_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220114-040032_DuckDuckGo.jpg
LOL the comment section is GOLD! Some of the finest schadenfreude Ive ever experienced!
Yet, interspersed are some comments worth sharing.
Anonymous
No.158101
158102 158104
twilight_sparkle_smirk_vector_by_arifproject-dak7fj5.png
>>158100
>Some of the finest schadenfreude Ive ever experienced!
I know that feeling, it is glorious to see how fanatic and illogical globers are.
Anonymous
No.158102
>>158101
Might wanna see this
>>158063
Anonymous
No.158103
158105
More grist for the mill
https://youtu.be/rjYc8h3xt-E
>Inside Flat Earth: An Exposè by an Ex-Flat Earther
Anonymous
No.158104
>>158101
>lol globers amirite?
To this point, no. 95% of the comments are vapid "I believe!" posts, often displaying a fundamental lack of comprehension of how evidence, physics, and the scientific method works. But as I indicated, there are occasional posts showing these theories fornthe hogwash they are.
Anonymous
No.158105
158106
abb3.png
>>158103
>Ex-Flat Earther
I really doubt it. Once redpilled there's not going back.
>SciManDan
Nothing else to add.
Anonymous
No.158106
158107
>>158105
Wow, rejection without investigation. How very consistent of you. Its no wonder you can unironocally believe/tout this horseshit
Anonymous
No.158107
158108
>>158106
>rejection without investigation
Projecting much? Huh?
Anonymous
No.158108
>>158107
>n.. no u!
Lol, what else do you call this but ignorance (as in, ignoring)?
>I really doubt it. Once redpilled there's not going back.
Anonymous
No.158109
>>158063
I mean ffs, you wont even look at the photos. Because you know, those photos are impossible on a flat earth. I will reiterate, Im not saying the earth is a perfect sphere and Ive made that case earlier ITT. I agree, there are plenty of questions to be asked.

But these pics are impossible on a flat earth, which is why you wont look. Its a pity I cant A. repost the images, and B. delete the post (so I can repost the pics), since I know that even with Mlpol's way-better-than-4chan linked-post-view you wont even slick the link.
But just in case.
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
For the record, Im being petulent because that seems to be the only thing that somehow gets through your skulls
Anonymous
No.158110
158111
For those of you who come to this thread to argue with those who made it, you should really learn to sage.
Anonymous
No.158111
158113
>>158110
Why, cuz its gonna slide off the board if done so? Have you seen the /vx/ catalog?
Anonymous
No.158113
158114
>>158111
How new to chansites are you? You don't bump stuff if you don't want to see it, because that perpetuates it. This is the same behavior that ruined /pol/, because the /ptg/ newfags don't know how to avoid bumping shill threads.
Anonymous
No.158114
158116
>>158113
Whoever said I didnt want people to see it? Sunlight is the best disinfectant anon.
Anonymous
No.158115
If (you) dont want to see it, apply filters. Shill threads are going nowhere cuz policy. This is about conditioning.
Anonymous
No.158116
158117
>>158114
No it fucking isn't. This is the internet, and anonymous to boot. Don't spread shitty memes.
Anonymous
No.158117
158118
>>158116
>no it isnt
Youre entitled to your opinion, but this really doesnt pertain to the thread. Your objections have been noted and summarily dismissed as immaterial. Anything else?
Anonymous
No.158118
158120
>>158117
Just stop bumping it if you don't like it.
Anonymous
No.158120
158121
>>158118
>>>/sp/18983 →
Anonymous
No.158121
158122
1591106992967.png
>>158120
Just learn to sage.
Anonymous
No.158122
158123
>>158121
>>>/sp/18984 →
Anonymous
No.158123
158124 158125
2778031.png
>>158122
Then just keep being a nigger I guess.
Anonymous
No.158124
>>158123
Can we get back to the topic now? Much as I appreciate the attention, its not pertinent to the thread.
Anonymous
No.158125
>>158123
This.
Anonymous
No.158126
sedgbgvbc.jpg
>globers gonna globe
WOW! I left for a few hours and all these new posts.
Anonymous
No.158137
158138
File (hide): F6D1682AC8F50ADD02499DA56DEDC88D-4624354.mp4 (4.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:39, Everything is perspective on flat earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Everything is perspective on flat earth.mp4
Everything is perspective on flat earth.
Anonymous
No.158138
158139
>>158137
Do they offer any proof or evidence to suggest this visualization, or is it pure speculation in an attempt to fit the theory? I mean, if flat earth were true as depicted, it could be confirmed by 5 people on a conference call, each operating cameras and surveying the sun.
Why hasnt that happened. It would be far easier than tbose hobby rockets and retardedly flawed laser experiments
Anonymous
No.158139
>>158138
*from separate continents
Anonymous
No.158140
Also OP, would you be a dear and specify which version of the flat earth mind virus theory you orescribe to? Is it the firmament dome? Plasma disk moon and sun? Are they on the dome, or are they way behind the dome?
At what point do the observable laws pf physics cease to function, and/or what causes their appearance of function.

And the big question:
How long before a predictive model, in which the observable phenomena can be explained using a flat earth, that is cohesive with all the other observable phenomena?
Anonymous
No.158144
158145
maxresdefault.jpg
File (hide): 7B4AF3953EBA2D104B3410ABCCC5A8F2-1058294.mp4 (1.0 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:07, EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.mp4
>Space is Scientifically Impossible!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avsCM5lrfN4
More redpills.
Anonymous
No.158145
158146 158147
0812dcc16a68b2f0c292e7f7594328f9.jpg
>>158144
Jesus Christ,....
>cherry-picked 10-sec clip
Im sure the revised explanation was ommitted because you're so committed to science, right?
>We put a beakur under a glass shroud and tha water escaped!
It doest appear to escape, it appears to diffuse throughout the glass chamber, in fact you can see the point it forms a 4th phasic seal
Oh you dont know what the 4th phase is?
Unsurprising. When water molecules reach a sufficiently excited state - such as when being pulled in one direction by gravity and pulled in the other by vaccuum, they change their configuration from H20 and reforms as H3O2.
H3O2 is orders of magnitude more dense per volume, and is part of the active process that constitutes the Ozone layer that makes a pressurized atmosphere possible, however the water would need to remain in a constantly excited state. Like, if it was at the border of an atmosphere and a vaccuum.
<back to our example
Atmospheric pressure is what enables gravity to operate as a force. Thats why outside the atmosphere (you could liken the atmosphere as an 'event horizon', though not an onerous one as is proposed borders a black hole) is a vaccuum.
>Sea level pressure- 1013.25
>Space pressure- .0000000000000000133
Golly, its almost like the greater dual-force applied on the molecular structure of h3o2 causes a magnification to the structural density of the water due to magnified excitation.
>The water escaped the beaker!
Uh huh, its a vaccuum. Thats what vaccuums do, they distribute molecular material throughout the space until reaching molecular equilibrium. Try adding enough water to the point that the water vapor saturates and starts to condense (read: try FILLING the beaker).
The rest is a series of fallacious conclusions based on the initial fallacious claim.

Still waiting for you to rationalize those boat pics!
Anonymous
No.158146
>>158145
Correction, the last few minutes actually argues my point funny enough. Thanks for that.
Anonymous
No.158147
158149
EBAbUT3XYAIhZIi.jpg
>>158145
>bringing forward rare molecules to obfuscate
>all based on the mythical gravity
And yet, gas masses and fictitious space vacuum cannot co-exist, it is an Impossibility.
Anonymous
No.158149
158152
>>158147
>I dont know about a thing so its invalid, so gravity is fake
Textbook ignorance
Anonymous
No.158152
158153
>>158149
>textbook blind faith
Gravity cannot be proven to exist. It is a theory, not a fact.
Anonymous
No.158153
158155
>>158152
That is a true statement only in subjective perception.
(read: belief =/= truth)
Anonymous
No.158154
Ill rephrase. Your conviction to flat earth speculation does not make it true, nor does it invalidate the testable, conclusive evidence that such speculation is false.
But of course you can plug you ears and 'la la la' all you want, Ive got plenty more evidince to produce for every laughable insinuated and poorly controlled experiment/video you produce.
Anonymous
No.158155
158156
Screen9.png
smug.png
>>158153
>That is a true statement only in subjective perception
You were saying?
Anonymous
No.158156
158157
Screenshot_20220116-065940_DuckDuckGo.jpg
>>158155
Whoa there, those are some awfully mainstream science sources. You said theyre all a bunch of masons, in on the deception! I guess they arent when it helps your argument?
>You were saying?
Read the articles fgt
>pic related
Anonymous
No.158157
158158 158163
>>158156
>general relativity
>Eistein pseudo science
Let's go to the root of relativity and derived branches of "theoretical physics", it is nothing more than stunts with numbers that can't be demonstrated in a lab. It is also called charlatanry.
See >>152559
Anonymous
No.158158
>>158157
Gravity only has the 'title' of theiry becausr they havent yet composed a model that accounts for gravity in quantum-physocal framework. Beyond that there are precise and thoroughly vetted (read: no one can disprove in spite of trying to make a name for themselves by disproving) their models.
Which brings me to the most glaring issue witb flat earthers.
Ego. Everyone wants to be 'the guy' or 'group' that has special knowledge and gets the crediy (or assumes the credit by identifying with the group) unique and better understanding. The problem is, it takes more than watching youtube videos to reach that point even if that was even possible in context.

Any day now, a pr3dictive model would be good. While I wait, address the boats.
Anonymous
No.158159
158160
>Beyond that, there are precise and thoroughly vetted mathematical models that conform to observed experimental phenomena. Meaning, the data matches the hypothesis, except when getting into quantum physics
Apologies, thats what I meant to say. I get all excited grtting to continually beat a person who wants more. I imagine thats what happend with Tyson in the beginning of that video, and why the clarification was ommitted.
Anonymous
No.158160
158162
>>158159
>Meaning, the data matches the hypothesis,
I beg to disagree. The methodology used by these hacks is to create mathematical models, not data, to match the hypothesis.
Anonymous
No.158162
158163
>>158160
Its literally the opposite, and thats literally what flatties do
Anonymous
No.158163
158164
>>158162
Ahem.
I remind you of >>158157
Anonymous
No.158164
158171 158173
>>158163
Yes, its theoretical mathematics because it operates at an infinitesimal level that it cant be effectivrly measured with ones eyes. Its not like you can hold a ruler up to it.
And yet the same video that attempts to cstigate modern science by presenting previous credible - by the video's own admission - scientists [i]all of whom had directly cohesive solar and astronomical charts, only varying with the increased precision of the medium. Copernucus for example, determined the orbits of the planets, but he couldnt get it quite right becausr he thought that the orbit was a c8rcle rather than an oblate. Same goes for pre/post Newton, in determining the shape of the planet.

You cant say its all bullshit, and then cite past scientists with contemporary ones, claiming the previous ones were doing it right. Thats a logical fallacy.
Either 1. The earth is flat and its all wrong OR
2. The earth is not flat, and there are elements to the equation that we cant yet account for, given the limited capacity of humans and the amount of time its taken to get as precise as it is.
Anonymous
No.158165
>oblate
Elipse*
Okay fine, Ill sage my addendums and corrections. Im not unreasonable XP
Anonymous
No.158171
158172
>>158164
>Yes, its theoretical mathematics because it operates at an infinitesimal level that it cant be effectivrly measured with ones eyes. Its not like you can hold a ruler up to it.
Isn't an overused example is the "Double Slit" experiment, where they keep having the results change every time the experiment is performed, prompting the logical conclusion that more tests need to be performed in under to understand it's intricacies.

And, retards foam at the mouth as an example of how "Quantum Physics is MAGIC".
Anonymous
No.158172
158174
>>158171
Are you seriously trying to imply theres no validity to the double slit experiment?
Anonymous
No.158173
158175
image.png
>>158164
>You cant say its all bullshit, and then cite past scientists with contemporary ones, claiming the previous ones were doing it right.
You can in your particular case because, while Copernucus and Newton were raving about their flowed understanding of the universe, there was the Greek Antikythera device from 150 BC that was rotting at the bottom of the Aegean sea that perfectly calculates the movement of the planets, the sun, and the stars down to a T.
Anonymous
No.158174
158175
>>158172
No, I was implying that the double slit experiment is an example of where more data is require to understand the phenominon, but that doesn't stop your average idiot from trying to use it as am example of how science is "magic".
Anonymous
No.158175
158176
>>158173
So glad you mentioned it
>ancient greek device that accurately charts the planets n stars n shit
Almost like theyre in orbit around the planet that isnt flat, without negating the possibikity of orbits and shit
>THEY were precise tho, and we arent today
I of all people will not contest that ancient cultures were more advanced than modern day, thats one of the salient points of the History is a Lie thread. That you dont realize how that supports my argument is baffling.
>>158174
>magic
Wow strawman
Expectations of the observer that has an observable effect on the experiment, are you denying that?
Anonymous
No.158176
158177
>>158175
Wait, who are you arguing with?
Anonymous
No.158177
>>158176
Im arguing with the assertion that theres a firmament dome on a flat earth and that space is a fabrication, when there exost anc8ent devices by which that can be proven false.
Anonymous
No.158207
158213
Dear Flat Earthers

if the earth is not round why are Radio Towers and Trebuchets designed with the curvature of the earth in mind?
Anonymous
No.158213
>>158207
That's what we are told.
Anonymous
No.158252
158253
>>>/mlpol/331364 →
Let me guess, they faked that too?
Anonymous
No.158253
158254
>>158252
>they faked that too?
In absence of space, that is the most plausible explanation.
Anonymous
No.158254
>>158253
Imagine unironically saying this
Anonymous
No.158262
hqdefault.jpg
ebenezer_breach-the_downfall_of_modern_astronomy.pdf
2322.png
>50 Scientific Facts for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy (Videobook)
>In the interest of preserving for posterity the wealth of flat Earth knowledge and research done during the late 19th and early 20th century, I am continuing a series of audiobook and PDF downloads to make them more easily and widely available. Today's selection is Ebenezer Breach's 1896 booklet "50 Scientific Facts for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy." You can download the free PDF here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/haj0ft8pllkitsy/ebenezer_breach-the_downfall_of_modern_astronomy.pdf?dl=0
>Please Note: Ebenezer Breach was a literalist Christian and makes a few points in this booklet which are clearly not scientific, and potentially not even facts. He also made his own astronomical measurements and had his own figures for the diameter and distance of the Sun, Moon and stars which differed from other 19th century flat Earthers, who themselves didn't have a consensus, other than to always be working with tens, hundreds and thousands, rather than the heliocentrist's millions, billions and trillions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk8hwjceGLo
Mirrors:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/50-scientific-facts-for-the-downfall-of-modern-astronomy-videobook_x4FmCMlheQbd3qY.html
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/50-Scientific-Facts-for-the-Downfall-of-Modern-Astronomy-(Videobook):8
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N9xpGEDH2hFA/
Anonymous
No.158267
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdn9cvJBt64&ab_channel=Thunderf00t
Anonymous
No.158276
>>158048
Little girls truly are the best
Anonymous
No.158414
158416 158558
3854.png
I post this for the globers. I truly doubt they will grasp the concept.

>Black Sun and Moon Phases Explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpj1kha4Ug
Anonymous
No.158416
158417
>>158414
By the way, I understand that access to the north pole is also forbidden as men with guns are guarding it.
Anonymous
No.158417
>>158416
>men with guns are guarding it
You talking about the Russians securing their oil reserves?
Anonymous
No.158555
5720.png
>How the moon happens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qo7uKmtA3Y
Another one on the Black Sun and the Moon.
Anonymous
No.158557
tGpML53VF0WF_960.jpg
c8485b8.jpg
>THE INSIDER REVEALS FLAT EARTH
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tGpML53VF0WF/
Anonymous
No.158558
158559
>>158414
So, a model that consiats of more than basic sketches should be forthcoming right? I mean, if that actually worked, it should be a simple matter to make a predictive model right? Nevermind the
>the sun and the moon are holograms
assertion, lets see a model.
>158557
>gets the compass and square backward
>look guise, its totally the same! These arre the sekretz obs da maysons
This is why most people need guidance and direction in their initiation. Its very easy to misinterpret and misappropriate meaning from occult symbols
Anonymous
No.158559
158560
File (hide): 07AC0FABB09B91AE1F249591A7C2F7D1-11618148.mp4 (11.1 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:08:43, north star polaris_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
north star polaris_EDIT.mp4
7fwew1e.jpg
>>158558
>This is why most people need guidance and direction in their initiation. Its very easy to misinterpret and misappropriate meaning from occult symbols
Yeah. It is not what it seems. It is all product of imagination. /s
Anonymous
No.158560
158561
>>158559
No, it definitely requires a Cypher to properly decode it all. Without that cypher however, one does tend to get blown away on flights of fancy, as evidenced in this video
Anonymous
No.158561
158562
>>158560
>Cypher
If for cypher you mean Gematria, then all is already set. Freemasonry is Kabbalism for the goyim and its sorcery is almost public.
Anonymous
No.158562
>>158561
Again, if that were the case, a model would be easily concocted, with easily established values.
Anonymous
No.158594
Bump
Anonymous
No.158625
3643.png
>Phenomenon Sun
>Sun is an electromagnetic phenomenon and happens in a semi-aetherial field above , at around 5500 Km altitude.
>It's diameter is 51 Km.
>It is made from fluorescence and phosphorised Helium (He).
>It is the pilot source of electromagnetic energy , giving it to the other inert gases below (Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rd) , charging them.
>These charged gasses are responsible for the colors of the daylight.
>Cosmic electromagnetic energy comes from below (Black Sun) and hits the inner side of our toroidal field.
>There is a prismatic refraction of this cosmic energy there, that separates it to (+) and (-), creating the Sun and the Moon at two moving spots with shape like lenses below where they are focusing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3g-k1X5AlY
Anonymous
No.158740
158743
To both remind flaggits which thread IS the flat earth thread, AND to propose a challenge which would give credit to the theory

We know gubmints wont allow entry to antarctica without authorization, whatever that REALLY means (again, no contest, its spoopy).
Why then doesnt someone sail around the perimeter of antarctica - in whatever way you want to visualize - and plot their trajectory? It would make very clear very fast which way the boat was steering, as well as the distances travelled.
Anonymous
No.158743
158744
F4S2PpW.png
>>158740
>Why then doesnt someone sail around the perimeter of antarctica
Read the thread and search it for Captain Cook.
>>149114
>>149115
>>149629
Anonymous
No.158744
>>158743
Yes! Cook's account is valid, but inconclusive! But I know someone somewhere has the means to livestream the shit, in current year. It will take me a couple decades to manage on my own, but if it hasn't happened by then I absolutely will. Indpendently manned and heavily vetted and doxed for transparency. Like, everyone subject to the third degree oh shit, that was a masonic reference! It literally was, where do you think the term 'giving the 3rd degree comes from? and made public.
And by made public, I mean in a convenient file attached to video records, not citations.
Anonymous
No.158745
And for clarity, I mean sail at least once, with overlapped cameras cycling their video times ensuring all equipment maintenance is likewise filmed, with live location, compass, etc coordinates visible
Anonymous
No.158804
158816
my-little-pony-mlp-other-mane-6-780571.png
Twilight knows. Equestria is flat.
Anonymous
No.158816
158836 158840
>>158804
Twilight is too smart to believe in a flat equestria
Anonymous
No.158836
158844
>>158816
Ahem.
See >>149265
Anonymous
No.158840
158844
>>158816
Equestria is not Earth. It could easily be flat.
At the very least, the sun and moon are smaller that the world.
Anonymous
No.158844
158861
>>158836
Oh my God! Discord used a turn of phrase and the ponies are looking at a map, It Must be Flat!
>>158840
Its Not Flat, And twilight is too High IQ to believe that it is.
Anonymous
No.158861
>>158844
It's not necessarily round either though.
Equestria is a fantasy world. It could be shaped like anything. The fact that the Equestria doesn't orbit its sun leaves the door open to completely different cosmologies.
Anonymous
No.159468
159481 159487
aa.png
bb.png
cc.png
dd.png
>Dear Spinning Ball Earth Believer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkjjsvgdsZ8
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/DearSpinningBallEarthBeliever:9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RoARro8TsSf7/
Anonymous
No.159481
159482 159485 159487 163308 163346
toronto.gif
>>159468
Anonymous
No.159482
159485 159487
>>159481
>incontravertable proof of earth curvature that will be summarily ignored cuz OP doesnt like thinking rationally
Anonymous
No.159485
159486 159487
>>159481
>>159482
Bullshit.
With a telescope can be brought it into a full view as shown over and over in this thread.
You are a deceiver.
Anonymous
No.159486
159487
>>159485
>your photograph evidence of landmarks viewed over planetary curvature are BULLSHIT! cuz I SAY SO!

Reiterating. Pic related displays curvature. Curvature is impossible on a flat earth.
Ergo, there cant be a flat earth.
Anonymous
No.159487
159488
>>159468
>>159481
>>159482
>>159485
>>159486
For posterity
Anonymous
No.159488
159490 159491 159501
penguin-it's-flat.jpeg
>>159487
>circular logic
Anonymous
No.159490
159492
>>159488
Still waiting
>>158063
Anonymous
No.159491
>>159488
Also, to clarify:
If one operates off the premise of this linked post, and the subsequently linked posts then OP alleges:
Ita circular reasoning(logic) to refute rhetorical/spurious posturing (see >>159468) especially with unarguable photographic (read: not subject to interpretation) evidence or else it's 'bullshit' for reasons that you're not allowed to know cuz (you) are in on the NASA-masonic conspiracy

Thank you for coming to my TEDtalk
Anonymous
No.159492
159493 163825
91uQP6upbQL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
>>159490
>Still waiting
If you believe Earth is round because a local optical effect on perspective, then you have a loooooooong way before to come to your senses.
The pile of evidence disproving the ball and cementing the plane is overwhelming.
Anonymous
No.159493
159789
>>159492
>wont respond to literal still-frames that refute entire premise
>claims others wont come to their senses
Still waiting on the refutation of Calculus, while we're at it, which wouldnt work if the earth was flat
Anonymous
No.159501
_SPHEREICALits-spherical-flat-earthers-guess-what-63664371.png
>>159488
It's spherical logic actually, you are just to dumb to understand it.
Anonymous
No.159789
465.png
>>159493
>globetard
Anonymous
No.159842
159882
unknown-546 (1).png

Anonymous
No.159882
>>159842
Both of these retards
Anonymous
No.160248
https://youtube.com/shorts/QsvwswQl6Vo?feature=share
Anonymous
No.160434
fe5.png
fe4.png
fe3.png
fe2.png
fe1.png

Anonymous
No.160435
162417
fe10.png
fe9.png
fe8.png
fe7.png
fe6.png

Anonymous
No.160515
>>150294
https://youtube.com/shorts/TVV4TSi9A6k?feature=share
https://www.space220fla.com/
Oh look, Disney made a 220 mile-high elevator, with a restaurant at the top.
Let me guess, its fake?
Anonymous
No.160516
globers.png

Anonymous
No.160517
640x0.jpg
>flat earthers any time their shit is disproven
Anonymous
No.160639
File (hide): F940BA84E71942A365F846AE7E2763B4-5749442.mp4 (5.5 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:03:06, Owen Benjamin M O O N W A V E.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Owen Benjamin  M O O N W A V E.mp4
Owen Benjamin || M O O N W A V E
Anonymous
No.161185
e29e6ed442240d7b 9.jpg
>Cavendish Experiment Proves Gravity? - (2:41 long)
>pseudoscience
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Cavendish-Experiment-Proves-Gravity-:0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/W2tADYOxjQu8/

-------

Transcript:
>In 1797, Henry Cavendish, the British scientist, Freemason, and wealthy grandson of the Duke of Devonshire, created an experiment which he claimed successfully proved the existence of gravity, measured its constant, and provided accurate figures for the exact masses of the Earth, Sun, Moon, and Planets. How did Cavendish achieve this quantum leap for heliocentric pseudo-science? He fixed two large lead balls on opposite ends of a torsion balance and hung them from the roof of his shed. By watching and recording slight motions of the contraption via telescope through his shed window so his mass would not affect the reading, Cavendish claimed to have proven gravity. Two small lead balls were hung near the large ones and any motion observed towards one another was touted as being the influence of gravity.
>Now, the Cavendish experiment has been widely criticized by the scientific community because never in over two centuries since its creation has anyone been able to replicate it! Firstly, the balls simply do not always attract one another as they must for the so-called gravitational constant to be constant at all. Sometimes the torsion balance turns towards the balls and sometimes away as it is impossible not to give some slight tremulous motion when interacting with it. Henry even complained in his notes how often as he was performing the measurement the contraption was still in oscillation. Secondly, since his calculated force of gravity was 10^39 weaker than the force of electro-magnetism, from which all material objects are composed, there is no control for the experiment which can factor out and positively differentiate the alleged gravitational force, from the known stronger electro-magnetic force. In other words, the balls could simply be attracting each other through static electricity, a known force existing in all things, billions of times stronger than gravity, and impossible to control for the experiment. Even though no one could replicate Cavendish’s findings, the experiment went down in history as a great success, and is still taught as veritable proof of universal gravitation in science textbooks today.
Anonymous
No.161188
27AE0E9CED3DF682C06301343DE85B14-96812.jpg
Would anyone be willing to provide me with lore pertaining to the old suns and moons in this particular image? I want inspiration for my fantasy setting. What are the black spheres next to the moons?

I've considered that a flat realm may be more interesting as a design for my fantasy setting, and I would like any unique lore that the flat realm model uses that would be inconsistent with the conventional round earth model.
It would of course be a missed opportunity to make my planet hollow, but perhaps I can work with that as physics get increasingly funky beyond the ice rings.
Anonymous
No.161189
161190
Another question, in the flat realm spinning model, where does the sun go when it sets, and why would it appear to dip below the horizon.
Assume I'd believe whatever you told me, but don't spare any details, as want this for worldbuilding.
Anonymous
No.161190
161191
>>161189
>where does the sun go when it sets, and why would it appear to dip below the horizon.
Perspective.
Read the thread for the pertinent answers, most are here.
Anonymous
No.161191
161192
>>161190
The thread is more than 600 posts long, so if you could help me out and point me to some post numbers, that would be much appreciated.
Anonymous
No.161192
161193
26wef8.jpg
>>161191
I'm sure it is just a matter of time for some anon come to the rescue.
Anonymous
No.161193
>>161192
It's also more of its own topic, tbh. I'm really only concerned with how to use this model as a fantasy cosmology. If anyone has thoughts/suggestions on that, I'd appreciate the input.
Anonymous
No.161245
1.png
2.png
NEW - Mar 3, 2022
CNN hit piece on Flat Earth
>Why some people STILL believe the Earth is flat
>Flat Earth videos rack up huge views on the Internet — but how could anyone believe such a fundamentally false idea? Daily Beast reporter Kelly Weill joins John Avlon on this week’s Reality Check to discuss her new book and explain how social media has given an old conspiracy theory a huge boost - and the best way to convince someone to leave these cult-like groups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTSJC9Tmt4E
Anonymous
No.161378
162073
File (hide): 91497C30D7A020AB391C8BC084A98003-8140525.mp4 (7.8 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:02:02, V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946).mp4) [play once] [loop]
V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946).mp4
>V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946).
https://odysee.com/v-2-rocket-films-%28flat%29-earth-in-%281946%29:a

Original video, not edited:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjXwsj8kHT4
Anonymous
No.162069
162070 162426
maxresdefault.jpg
>Nikon P900 Stars- Real Stars and Planets vs NASA images. Stars are not what they tell us! - (4:51 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr6g7Pe92C4
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9mmDFd0q5Lca/
Anonymous
No.162070
>>162069
>in this video people unironically think that a Nikon camera is giving them an undistorted picture
Anonymous
No.162073
>>161378
After watching both videos, I see no evidence for a flat earth. If you would be so kind as to indicate the part that you feel is evidence, that would be great.
Anonymous
No.162383
Okay, after scrolling through all of this, I've gotten some decent ideas for my fantasy setting.
Anonymous
No.162403
162405 162408 162409 162413
Question for flat earthers and round earthers: How can a world larger than Earth have a lower gravity? Preferably 0.9x to 0.8x.
Anonymous
No.162405
>>162403
Maybe if it were a gas planet? Lower mass should mean lower gravity.
Anonymous
No.162408
162425
>>162403
Uranus hos very low gravity, mate.
Anonymous
No.162409
1575337360396.png
>>162403
Cull all the dense mf's, like everyone ITT
Anonymous
No.162413
fmp,x_small,gloss,wall_texture,product,750x1000.u1.jpg
>>162403
>gravity
It doesn't exist. Think in density and buoyancy.
That said, there are 44 instances of gravity in this bread with plenty of information.
Anonymous
No.162417
162422
>>160435
So pic 4 does come up if you follow the link, it's page 35 if you follow the actual number of pages included in the pdf but 30 if you follow the numbers in the down-left corner of the pages.

Don't know what that means in the context of this document yet, though.
Anonymous
No.162418
Maybe someday I'll go through this thread.
Anonymous
No.162422
162598
>>162417
>Don't know what that means in the context of this document yet
It means that the military and NASA make all their calculations assuming Earth is flat, otherwise the math would be so incredible complex and unmanageable that all their projects will be unpractical. Not to mention that making calculations on the assumption that Earth is flat, the math checks perfectly out.
Anonymous
No.162425
162426
>>162408
Uranus doesn't exist, it's a CIA psyop
>refuses to elaborare further
Anonymous
No.162426
>>162425
>Uranus
>a so called planet
See >>162069 as an introduction.
Anonymous
No.162449
ACA2BDB47A357B06B20AECF5C44B39A3-326681.png
Zero doubt, this will be ironically weaponized but thats fine cuz you cant fake authenticity
Anonymous
No.162456
Aeiou Stars aren't real
Anonymous
No.162583
162584
hqdefault.jpg
>Antarctica Is NOT What You Think! [CLIP]
>A video that should end the idea that we live on a globe with a southern continent at the bottom surrounding the south pole.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoX27ItX22M
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/euyI2q1sZQZj/

Full Length Video on Rokfin: https://rokfin.com/post/80542/ARCHIVE
Anonymous
No.162584
>>162583
This is why Im on about flat earth.
I agree
Its curious/suspicious that there is no presented video of a complete 360deg. shadow. That should be readily available, easy to document and produce, and that it isnt being done is worthy of significant consideration.
Which legitimately leaves us with questions about why, and to what purpose. I know what conclusion you lot wanna jump to, because you're an idealogue.
As for the lengths of the shadows,... I dont know if the videographer has ever heard of slopes. Cuz you can very clearly obser e slopes in all the 'elongated/short' shadow videos.

Ive said it before, Ill say it again. There are a number of unanswered question about the globe model.
However, there are vastly more unanswered questions about a flat earth model, and until such a time as a flat earth model can be producex, from which a predictive model can be observed and validated through trial, its lunacy to attempt to throw out the globe, especially withiut being able to explain why calculus doesnt work.

Any day now on that.
Let me rephrase that. Lets assume the earth IS flat.
Why then does calculus apply cohesively to a multitude of naturally occurring phenomena, except the planet?
Am I to assume calculus is part of the masonic nasa conspiracy?
Anonymous
No.162586
162590
Another rephrase: Why does calculus produce cohesive results that indicate a globe model if the earth is flat? If calculus were capable of quantifying and predicting all walks of natural phenomena with accuracy, why does that accuracy dissolve when applied to the globe, especially in that the same multi-genre cohesion can be observed to indicate a globe?
Simply
>Calculus is a perfectly viable, until you apply it to the globe.
Why?
Bonus points if you approach the question from an arbitrary standpoint, as opposed to starting from... your usual.
>>149639
>>149962
>>149974
>>154733
Golly, I wonder why these posts dont warrant an answer/response
Anonymous
No.162590
162592
>>162586
>Calculus
Are you referring to trigonometry?
Anonymous
No.162592
>>162590
Did Newton invent trigonometry to map the circumference of the planet?
Anonymous
No.162598
162599 162600
Wow, a lengthy silence; I assume OP is versing himself with Calculus. This is not to cast aspersions on trig, its more to say that simplified equations on the internet will never give values that will match in-field values. The planet is far more nuanced than a simple equation or ratio of slope over distance.
>>162422
>otherwise the math would be so incredible complex and unmanageable that all their projects will be unpractical.
You said it, not me
Anonymous
No.162599
>>162598
>I assume OP is versing himself with Calculus
No nigger, I'm cooking diner after a long day.
Anonymous
No.162600
162736
>>162598
>This is not to cast aspersions on trig, its more to say that simplified equations on the internet will never give values that will match in-field values.
WTF are you talking about, math is math. Give some example where math won't apply.
Anonymous
No.162732
162733
IMG-20220324-000546-348-1623x2048.jpeg

Anonymous
No.162733
162734 162735
>>162732
Can someone explain to this nigger what relativity is
And whiplash
Anonymous
No.162734
>>162733
>relativity
>whiplash
Movies?
Anonymous
No.162735
>>162733
At least you tried
Anonymous
No.162736
162737
>>162600
Newton's planetary calculations. Go on, explain where he went wrong.
Anonymous
No.162737
162738
>>162736
>calculations
There's nothing wrong with them. The problem is that Newton assumes a heliocentric system, which is a fiction of course.
Anonymous
No.162738
162739
>>162737
Are you of the position that he didnt validate his calculations through testing?
Anonymous
No.162739
162740
>>162738
>validate
>testing
The calculations are fine, the issue is that they are applied to a theoretical model impossible to verify.
NASA and other transnational agencies claiming the existence of space are lying.
Anonymous
No.162740
162741
>>162739
So thats a yes then? You unironically believe that he invented Calculus, but didnt bother to perform a single experiment to test his findings?
Anonymous
No.162741
>>162740
>You unironically believe that he invented Calculus
Your words, not mine.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz would strongly disagree.
>but didnt bother to perform a single experiment to test his findings?
And how would he? Testing the numbers against moving celestial objects may match, but the core of the issue is if those objects in the firmament are really planets as Newton assumed.
Anonymous
No.162789
162790
File (hide): D742178025A27F2C3B2FF42D0AE5B7F7-2978930.mp4 (2.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:50, GAME OVER GLOBERS.mp4) [play once] [loop]
GAME OVER GLOBERS.mp4
GAME OVER GLOBERS.
Anonymous
No.162790
162791
>>162789
There's even a specific wikipedia on this for Norway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_of_Norway
>A straight line along Norway's sea borders (the coastal perimeter) is 2,650 kilometers (1,650 mi) long.[1][2] Along the coast there are many fjords, islands, and bays, resulting in a low-resolution coastline of over 25,000 kilometers (16,000 mi).[3] At 30-meter (98 ft) linear intercepts, this length increases to 83,281 kilometers (51,748 mi)[4] (see the coastline paradox)

And then like that says
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox
Anonymous
No.162791
162792
>>162790
>Benoit Mandelbrot
Yes, his observations on the dynamics of planes will very neatly put the final nail in the flat earth coffin, assuming we get to it
Anonymous
No.162792
162793
>>162791
>his observations on the dynamics of planes will very neatly put the final nail in the flat earth coffin
Interesting. Would you deliver?
Anonymous
No.162793
>>162792
(you) of all anons ought appreciate the irony when I say
>Spoonfeeding Request: DENIED
Anonymous
No.162794
162795 162796
How are either of you retards supposed to convince each other if neither of you ever want to put in the minimum effort to "spoon-feed" the over party?
It's the same shit every week with you fucks. Ffs, just explain your viewpoints.
Anonymous
No.162795
162797
2367315.jpg
>>162794
They enjoy the attention that they get from each other more than the arguments themselves.
Anonymous
No.162796
162797
>>162794
Either side would claim that the minimal-to-moderate effort has since been applied, and in their specific mentalities they would be right.
Both parties feel justified in disregarding any/all of the opposition arguments, and point tontheir opponent's inabikity to see what they see as evidence of the other's folly.
Anonymous
No.162797
162798
>>162795
>>162796
It's all so tiresome.
Anonymous
No.162798
162799 162822 162824
th.jpg
>>162797
Tired no longer friend. The horizon will always be flat.
Anonymous
No.162799
162800 162801
>>162798
>Pic
This is facebook tier retardation
Anonymous
No.162800
434-4349649_transparent-smug-anime-face-png-mlp-flash-sentry.png
>>162799
>deflection
Anonymous
No.162801
162802
>>162799
Welcome to the flat earth thread
Anonymous
No.162802
162803 162805
>>162801
And yet, globers cannot prove the curve, unless NASA told me so.
Anonymous
No.162803
162804
>>162802
So how autistic are you?
Anonymous
No.162804
162809
>>162803
>personal matters
Stick to the topic.
Anonymous
No.162805
162806
>>162802
Its been countless times, in countless ways, by countless methods.
A bit hyperbolic, the point being that (you) and your lot have JUST enough technical knowledge to THINK youve unassailable proof, when all you have is a bunch of experiments that need to be reevaluated.
Cuz thats how science works. When an experiment gives results outside the well-established expectation, you first vet the experiment, not the well-established finding. Becaude at the end of the day, theres more money in refuting a well established finding than the theory that comes of it.
I would love to be presented with the same experiment conducted by numerous people using different equipment and achieving the same/correlating results. But I dont, all I have is a bunch of niche attempts to conduct an experiment that dont pass the most basic threshold for anything more than data sampling.
And thats what (you) have presented as evidence, which when asked for specifics, BEGAN the infamous 'spoonfeed denied' campaign.
TL;DR OP cant put up but wont shut up
Anonymous
No.162806
162808 162809
th3.jpg
>>162805
Allow me to synthesize the curve issue here: "Fake Science" fed by the freemasons.

>And thats what (you) have presented as evidence, which when asked for specifics, BEGAN the infamous 'spoonfeed denied' campaign.
I disagree, you and your cohorts can not ask for specifics when the bread has plenty of it. And the very reason is because you are unwilling to research more, let alone to read this whole thread.
Anonymous
No.162808
162812
>>162806
>this thread has lots of specifics, go now and find them
Anonymous
No.162809
162810
>>162804
How can the earth be flat when its hollow? It can be only one, and its not flat.
>>162806
How are the jews involved?
Anonymous
No.162810
162811
>>162809
>How are the jews involved?
Not the jews per se, but the masons.
Read the bread for details.
Anonymous
No.162811
162813
>>162810
>Not the jews
Opinion discarded
Anonymous
No.162812
>>162808
That's why you need to lurk moar.
Anonymous
No.162813
162814
>>162811
Oh its not just that its not the Jews, but:
the moon is fake (not a planetoid)
the planets are fake (cuz a nikon camera yo)
the stars are fake (theyre not stars, theyre... did I mention the nikon camera?)
and much more!
Go on, sift through thenpages of that shit. Or else you're a shill, or braindead. Thats OPs position.
Anonymous
No.162814
>>162813
>Thats OPs position.
Actually is not only OP's position, but hard evidence posted here.
(You) have plenty of time to debunk it, and yet (you) squandered it with strawmans and character assassination attempts.
Go figures.
Anonymous
No.162815
162816
Screenshot_20220228-080616_DuckDuckGo.jpg
We pointed at two boats with lasers
we cant do simple math
our homemade rockets ran into atmopheric conditions, er, the firmament dome
ANTARCTICA
we cant comprehend scale, dimension, or circular/spherical-obloid geometry
... all for the low low price of hours+ of your time!
Anonymous
No.162816
d1e.png
>>162815
>we cant do simple math
Now you are being maliciously deceptive, aka dishonest.
The math is already set by the freemasons stating that the supposed globe has a radius of 3,959 miles, experiments debunk that in an unequivocal way.
See >>149071 pic 3.
Stop lying.
Anonymous
No.162817
162818
1646305855901.png
Flat Earth is a Jewish psyop to make right wingers look like retards.
Anonymous
No.162818
162819
>>162817
Sure, if (you) can debunk it, but you cannot.
Anonymous
No.162819
1437262.jpg
>>162818
I could, but you'd pretend that it's bullshit, like a good shabbos goy.
Anonymous
No.162822
162823 162824
>>162798
It does cut through the Earth. It's a magnetic field. What did you think?
Anonymous
No.162823
162824
>>162822
Wait until he gets to the part about gravity 'not being real'
Anonymous
No.162824
163525 164825
download (3).png
>>162822
>>162798
Оh, you mean compasses don't point into the ground? Compasses can't even point down so they'd just rotate on the axis they can point to anyway. But it's a field. It's going along the axis not pointing straight at the North. We see the same thing on smaller observable scales too

>>162823
GRAVITY holds no WATER
*deflated beach ball*
Anonymous
No.162825
162826
Screenshot_20220410-192150_Brave.jpg
lol wut
Anonymous
No.162826
162828
b3c.gif
>>162825
>Flat Earth Society
Controlled opposition. If you actually read this thread you would already know it.
Anonymous
No.162828
1521064278013.gif
>>162826
>Controlled opposition
Anonymous
No.162829
File (hide): 9EFF799D383166197732C71F7A60DF60-4404388.mp4 (4.2 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:56, Hitting The Dome.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Hitting The Dome.mp4
Some rocket surfing the dome.
Anonymous
No.162838
31854.png
32110.png
2356.jpg
>Chris UK - Globe Lie Gamechanger
>The following video portrays a scientifically proven analysis that not only questions the preconditioned narrative that we live on a spinning ball but also how that information has been packaged into a format that pertains to alleviate any doubt regarding the shape, structure, and multifaceted dynamics of how our world and the universe can exist. We can choose to follow the status quo and never question the world we live in, or, we can choose to disseminate the evidence, open our eyes, and realise that truth can only be obtained when science and our senses are coaligned.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Awq4-ETSTbw/
The video has some math and might not be suitable for most ballers.
Anonymous
No.162861
162862 162863
Screenshot_20220410-192018_Brave.jpg
Flat eartherism is a psyop to distract whites from jews because there are no jews to talk about when it comes to radio waves or centrifugal force
Anonymous
No.162862
>>162861
There are freemasons and that is close enough as freemasonry is judaism for the goyim.
Anonymous
No.162863
162865
>>162861
I feel like either way it's mostly just schizos, but this makes more sense than the other conspiracy. I still don't know what they gain from saying the Earth is round if it's flat. Best answer I've gotten is something vague about defying god because bible says it's flat
Anonymous
No.162865
sunset.jpg
>>162863
>I still don't know what they gain
The truth.
Anonymous
No.162875
162877
https://youtu.be/4Qpzl8bWMnI
While not appearing to be a strict flatty in a literal sense, analysis of this guy can offer insight into the dynamic in which a flat earther conceptualizes and formulates their worldview and argues their case.
Note, he is at no point making an argument. His points have the appearance of arguments, but all he is arguing is his personal disbelief, based on a lack of comprehension of what he is seeing. This is the trap flat earthers beckon reasonable skeptics into, and why 'debates' and discussions with flat earthers never go anywhere.
Its not about arguing facts and evidence, because if facts and evidence were comprehended there'd be no argument.
Flat earthers insist on arguing their diabelief, which is as subjective as what one thinks 'the best flavor of ice cream is'. Additionally, flatties positions (from their perspective) is actually insulated by a lack of comprehension.
Now, a skeptical person wouldnt conclude either a flat or a round earth, they would keep asking questions to determine which viewpoints, data sets, figures, and values are corroborrated by other experiments and data sets. Eventually, those values will coalesce into an aggregated spectrum of concurrence and consistency.
Flat earthers however have already jumped the shark and have wilfully vested their interest in proving/promoting flat earth rather than asking the questions that would lead them to a viable and predictive model that can withstand scrutiny.
In short, being a flat earther is about promoting a 'flat earth' - as in, an ideologue - rather than pursuing a framework that explains all the observable phenomena, while accounting for a flat earth.
You cant educate a person on how ignorant they are of the existing science when their worldview depends on that ignorance, and they will resent you for trying. Protip: thats what the Psalm(?) about pearls before wolves/dogs is about.
Anonymous
No.162877
162887
>>162875
>but all he is arguing is his personal disbelief, based on a lack of comprehension of what he is seeing
Projecting much?
By the way, that man is using his brain and bases his belief on a very real phenomena: entropy.
On the other hoof, globers base their faith on establishment's fairy tales.
Anonymous
No.162887
>>162877
If the earth is flat, why do Radio Towers work best when they are tall?
The earth is not flat, and Radio Towers are tall so their signal can travel around the globe better.
Anonymous
No.162935
IMn2izUymi90_960.jpg
>Witness the Flat Earth Awakening of Owen Benjamin
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IMn2izUymi90/
Anonymous
No.162936
162937
>tides
https://youtube.com/shorts/dreHvsvXR9c?feature=share
Anonymous
No.162937
162938
>>162936
>African charlatan
Try again.
Anonymous
No.162938
162941
>>162937
Not an argument.
The point is: if gravity isnt real, the moon isnt real, the earth is flat etc.,
Explain the tides
Anonymous
No.162941
162943
>>162938
>Not an argument.
Pretty much it is. Taking seriously an African in art, philosophy, science, or logic, is preposterous.
Anonymous
No.162943
>>162941
Tides, wh3n3ver you're ready
Anonymous
No.162945
163139
>thinks an ad hominem is an argument
This thread, in a nutshell
Anonymous
No.162946
163010
Unscientific nonsense like Terrain Theory and Flat Earth are PsyOps to make any site that welcomes talk of it look unappealing.

Where do discussions about these things go?

Do the Flat Earthers have answers for why trebuchet calculations must account for the curvature of the earth to hit their targets, and why they miss their targets if they assume the earth is flatter or more curved than it actually is?

Can Terrain Theorists explain Antibiotics?
Anonymous
No.163010
163011 163012 163685
>>162946
>psyop
Concurred
https://youtu.be/he-7vs0BkLE
One should draw their own conclusions
Anonymous
No.163011
163013 163014
bust_pfft_by_xsparklingstarlight-d9v0g25.png
>>163010
>One should draw their own conclusions
I did.
DITRH allowed the glober to win. Why? I don't know.
Going straight to the basic facts: If there is not curve, then there is not planet, then there is not space, then there is not universe, and the whole fake science comes down in a spectacular fashion.
Anonymous
No.163012
yjm827.png
>>163010
This is a summary of the debate. Very poor indeed.
Anonymous
No.163013
163033
>>163011
Tides
Anonymous
No.163014
163015
>>163011
>DITRH allowed the glober to win
You have evidence of this?
>curve
I already showed you, ITT, with evidence from one of your fancy Nikon P1000's.
Anonymous
No.163015
163016 163019
>>163014
So are you the same guy that spergs about the KGB?
Anonymous
No.163016
>>163015
Flail harder flatty.
Tide
Go on, explain it. Cuz the tide has been a thing since during EVERY-centric, every curve-or-not-curve culture.

Be a good lad, tell me how the tides work.
It should be easy, I could map it quite simply using many flat earth pizzas. The why or how though....
Anonymous
No.163017
163482
6efda847d2e53315fd735cc4c3bd4eea.jpeg
God dammit
Anonymous
No.163019
163020
>>163015
Yeah, it is he same kike.
Anonymous
No.163020
>>163019
Deflect harder flaggit.
The Tide. Any day now.
Anonymous
No.163023
163033
Oekaki.png
I call it the roving titty model. This accurately displays the phenomenon of tidal forces, on the flat earth. Cuz its totally flat y'all
Anonymous
No.163024
163033
Oekaki.png
Overhead view.
See how the nipple represents the peak of the tide on the respective half of the pizza, the titty expanding ourward in an ovoid titty shape. Dont question it, boobies
Anonymous
No.163025
163033
Oekaki.png
sideways view, line pointing toward north pole
Anonymous
No.163033
163034 163077 164056
maxresdefault.jpg
Scre040.png
>>163013
>>163023
>>163024
>>163025
>tides
I don't know much about tides, but you look obsessed by then.
So I investigated a bit and I found the usual sources claiming the existence of the moon's gravitational force as responsible. Of course that's pure non-sense based on faith. Then I went to a reputable source to find out about and perhaps to please your curiosity.

>Eric Dubay: Cause of the Tides (13:53 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEP3zhso8jE
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TheFlatEarthAwakening:0/eric-dubay-cause-of-the-tides-on-flat:b
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3kYRA7SE8We6/
Anonymous
No.163034
Screenshot_20220420-070037_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220420-070414_DuckDuckGo.jpg
>>163033
>I dont know
Holy shit! Shocking. Thats the first scientific position youve taken all thread. Are you feeling okay?
Meanwhile, Dubay
>It doesnt make sense to me so its bullshit
Yeah, he says that alot. I did get a laugh out of pic 1 tho
>pic 2
Is that a hollow earth diagram?
>Mount Meru at the north pole
Citations Needed
Seriously, Im curious about this, and anecdotes dont cut it. If these e plorers found it, it should be repeatable.
Again, this seems to support hollow earth because meanwhile....
Anonymous
No.163035
Screenshot_20220419-160927_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220419-160941_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Gonna get spec ific now, because the debate had a designated time structure.
How is this phenomenon possible?, where the stars can be observed to rotate in opposite directions, if its a flat earth?
Anonymous
No.163036
163037
https://youtu.be/bvi9jjyVuGo
Not sure what current events look like, but was very interested to see that Dubay has been somewhat uninvoted from FE conferences and panels? Ngl, I find his position on the Holocaust, Jews, and international finance to be quite CREDIBLE. Ngl, this is the first time he has said anything that make me want to have sterilized his parents
Anonymous
No.163037
>>163036
*makes me not want to have
Anonymous
No.163060
900.png
>Clouds behind the sun
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tBUui1UTPtM4/
Just a curiosity. /s
Anonymous
No.163076
unknown (18) (4).png

Anonymous
No.163077
163079 163082
>>163033
>a reputable source
Are you being serious?
Anonymous
No.163079
>>163077
Unironically, he is serious
Anonymous
No.163082
>>163077
Absolutely. Dead serious.
Anonymous
No.163085
163090
garbage science.jpg
0920.png
>Cosmology Has Some Big Problems
>The field relies on a conceptual framework that has trouble accounting for new observations
>What do we really know about our universe?
>Born out of a cosmic explosion 13.8 billion years ago, the universe rapidly inflated and then cooled, it is still expanding at an increasing rate and mostly made up of unknown dark matter and dark energy ... right?
>This well-known story is usually taken as a self-evident scientific fact, despite the relative lack of empirical evidence—and despite a steady crop of discrepancies arising with observations of the distant universe.
>In recent months, new measurements of the Hubble constant, the rate of universal expansion, suggested major differences between two independent methods of calculation. Discrepancies on the expansion rate have huge implications not simply for calculation but for the validity of cosmology's current standard model at the extreme scales of the cosmos.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/cosmology-has-some-big-problems/
Take a comfy seat and enjoy an admission of scientific baloney when claims that are stated as fact are just deliriant theories. Hypothesis are not facts, but just speculation.
Anonymous
No.163090
163091
>>163085
But you said that outer space was fake
Anonymous
No.163091
163093
>>163090
Correct. Cosmologists base their theories on a false paradigm.
Anonymous
No.163093
163094
>>163091
But the guy in the article mentions the space telescopes. Is he in on the con?
Anonymous
No.163094
163095
>>163093
I have to guess that it is the same case like the normies. They believe that the "data" and "CGI" is real.
Anonymous
No.163095
163096
>>163094
But this is the same guy you're presenting as refuting the con. So which is it?
Anonymous
No.163096
163109
>>163095
>So which is it?
It is that you have comprehension difficulties.
The guy is not refuting the con, but admits that establishment' scientific theories are shaky at best and driven by ideology, not facts.
Anonymous
No.163109
163110
>>163096
But its Scientific American, arent they like the head of the Freemasonic Jewish round-earth psyop? Shouldnt we be distrusting them?
Anonymous
No.163110
163111
>>163109
>playing riddles
Try harder.
Anonymous
No.163111
163112
>>163110
Im just clarifying that unless they say something that you think supports your argument you present them as relevance, but the 99.99% of the time they go against your argument that theyre Nasa-masonic shills in on the psyop.
Anonymous
No.163112
163113
>>163111
So?
Anonymous
No.163113
163114
>>163112
So 99.99% of the time theyre actively involved in the psyop, which is something you can arbitrarily determine just by who they are, EXCEPT for 0.01% of the time when they are saying something that still supports the other 99.99% of their content (which you have already 'refuted'as 'disinfo'), but tangentially gives a nod to the need for more expansive models.
Nothing about his paper says anything that refutes a spherocal earth model, in fact the entirety of the content is based around such models.
In what way was posting that article credible to a flat earth position?
Anonymous
No.163114
163115
>>163113
I believe you are projecting and what you describe applies to (you).
You consider the information valid if only comes from oligarch funded sources, but independent ones are dismissed. But when some of the first bring doubt, you resort to a futile attempt to discredit OP's deluge of facts.
Anonymous
No.163115
163116
e7e26ffa8e26441587f19e3cb25f6918--so-funny-hilarious.jpg
>>163114
>literally claims that round earth science is a psyop
>literally posts a mainstream publication that institutionally supports the round earth
>Gets called out for it
>Nuh uh, its (you) who does that
Anonymous
No.163116
Long-Tongue-Closeup-Face.jpg
>>163115
Suit yourself.
Anonymous
No.163117
Heres a quick way to observe that the flat earth model is BS.
How come, if the sun is actually a disk some thousand miles away, why does it never distort in perspective?
If the earth were flat, the disk that is the sun would appear increasingly oval over distance due to perspective.
Anonymous
No.163118
163121 163122 163130
Clarifying for posterity
If the sun (and the moon) were disks, the only way they could appear as round is if they were perfectly perpendicular to the observer's position. As such, a person on the east coast viewing the evening sun could not see a round sun at the same time someone on the west coast viewing the afternoon sun perfectly round.
Unless.
A. The sun was actually impossibly far away
and/or
B. The sun is a sphere
Anonymous
No.163121
163124
latest.jpeg
>>163118
>Clarifying for posterity
Eww, no.
You are obfuscating for posterity.
From where did you get the idea that the sun and moon are disks?
Anonymous
No.163122
163125
addressing_Cadance_M.jpeg
>>163118
I give you a hint.
Anonymous
No.163123
@163121
This, sun's literally just a giant lamp from the heavens
Anonymous
No.163124
163128
>>163121
>where did you get the idea
Its been proclaimed by many of the 'sources' ITT, including you implicitly, in your attempts to claim that the planets/space phenomenon in general is a psyop.
Anonymous
No.163125
163126
>>163122
Imagine thinking this is an intelligent post
Anonymous
No.163126
>>163125
Actually a wise post.
Anonymous
No.163128
163129
star-in-moon.jpg
>>163124
The idea that the moon might be a disk has some ground, but it has not been proven, the same goes for the sun.
See the translucent moon and through it, a star.
Anonymous
No.163129
163132 163133
svdsa.png
>>163128
Anonymous
No.163130
163134 163311
1111.jpg
1112.jpg
1113.jpg
>>163118
>Clarifying for posterity
>If the sun (and the moon) were disks, the only way they could appear as round is if they were perfectly perpendicular to the observer's position. As such, a person on the east coast viewing the evening sun could not see a round sun at the same time someone on the west coast viewing the afternoon sun perfectly round.
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.163131
images-o.png

Anonymous
No.163132
163135 163136 163138
>>163129
>Deboonked
https://www.quora.com/If-the-moon-is-238-900-miles-away-from-earth-out-in-deep-black-space-then-how-come-we-can-see-the-clear-blue-sky-behind-it
Anonymous
No.163133
>>163129
You're not seeing the blue sky behind it, you're seeing the sky in front of it.
The sky is milky blue because of the color of the atmosphere. The moon is beyond the edge of the atmosphere, so part of it that isn't illuminated looks like the sky.
Anonymous
No.163134
163135
1575498059078.png
>>163130
<Deeeeeeeeboonk'd
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-moon-reflect-sun-rays-more-like-a-disc-than-a-sphere-as-it-appears-to-the-naked-eye-from-earth
Anonymous
No.163135
163137 163139
>>163132
>>163134
>Source: some random faggot
The only thing gayer than deboonking with snopes is deboonking with quora.
Anonymous
No.163136
163139
84014.png
>>163132
>Taking a pedophile as a source
Anonymous
No.163137
>>163135
Do these pedos draw their power from glober souls?!
Anonymous
No.163138
163140
>>163132
>Blue fog
It is speculation and I didn't find any research about it.
Still, why a supposedly solid object in the sky let us see stars through it remains a mystery.
Anonymous
No.163139
163141
>>163135
>>163136
Remember these? >>162945 >>162938
Anonymous
No.163140
163142
1575600514271.png
>>163138
>"Triple kill!"
https://www.quora.com/If-the-moon-truly-is-a-large-spherical-rock-why-can-we-see-stars-through-it
Anonymous
No.163141
>>163139
tks for the yous
Anonymous
No.163142
163146
index.jpeg
>>163140
>https://www.quora.com/If-the-moon-truly-is-a-large-spherical-rock-why-can-we-see-stars-through-it
>Don't fall for stupid meme
Like NASA's?
Anonymous
No.163143
1572324899637.jpg
>whataboutism
Don't worry anon, we all know it's just those pesky G5 towers dumbing you down.
Anonymous
No.163144
163145
Would you consider the possibility that the moon is actually self-luminescent?
Anonymous
No.163145
>>163144
It's reflective. It reflects the flight of the sun from the illuminated side.
Anonymous
No.163146
>>163142
Make an actual counter-argument.
Anonymous
No.163147
163308 163331
When this thread inevitably gets re-made, make sure it has IDs so that we can have real arguments with consistency.
Anonymous
No.163308
163310
>>163147
But anon, the flatty doesnt WANT arguments with consistency, he cant even be bothered to make arguments other than to point at videos and say 'its in there somewhere'.
Meanwhile if you post something incontravertable - and dobthe labor of providing screenshots, he'll ignore it entirely or (worse) will refuse to acknowledge the evidence.
Like here:
>>159481
Speaking of horseshit, remember this time?
Fuck IT, lets make it a double-feature! LITERALLY!
https://youtu.be/3OfbwhU5PQk
Anonymous
No.163310
163312
>>163308
I just think there'd be better discussions if it were more obvious when posters made arguments that directly contradicted each other.
Anonymous
No.163311
f3bd6995ed80c6e9c65ecdb16942777c.webp.png
b0351c65bb9fb7b23efadabea43700ba.webp.png
637d5044c8033a9e99636cb53e553da8.webp.png
>>163130
You don't see specular highlights on the moon because it's a very rough object with a high brightness. Here's it in blender
Anonymous
No.163312
pcqrkpXKi.png
>>163310
I admire your optimism
Anonymous
No.163314
>Globe shills.
Damn.
Anonymous
No.163328
85917553.jpg

Anonymous
No.163331
163332 163334
>>163147
Seriously though, why would it get remade? You do know that there's no bump-limit on /vx/ right?
Anonymous
No.163332
163333
you can't stop me.gif
>>163331
Yeah. The thread is fine how it is.
Globers' bullying can't stop the truth.
Anonymous
No.163333
163335
>>163332
Yeah, this is the flatty, who doesnt want ids.
I didnt say there wasnt anything wrong with this thread, only an idiot would think that (proven right again), and lo along comes the idiot to proclaim such.
I was just alluding to the fact that there is no need to repost a thread cuz golly gee, I wonder WHY threads on /vx/ dont have a bump limit.
Thats disingenuous, I know exactly why, I just wonder if anyone ELSE thinks it was a bad idea
Anonymous
No.163334
163339
>>163331
Threads have bump limits, they just don't slide.
Anonymous
No.163335
163341
>>163333
I think all boards could benefit to have shorter bump limits, tbh. It's unhealthy for threads to go on this long.
Anonymous
No.163336
unknown (23) (8).png
I might make a thread about the ideas that come with flat-realm cosmologies in fantasy settings.
A lot of conventional fantasy settings assume a standard planetary model for their material planes, but have infinite/expanding flat realms for their extraplanar space. The concept of an infinite flat realm surrounded by concentric ice rings where the borders of reality grow thin is a world-building cosmology I want to experiment with; it could be good for pony-themed games.
Anonymous
No.163337
DfCw7mKUYAE5iTF (1).jpg
The ice rings could be something like the Dark Continent in the Magi setting. Perhaps also a shadowy spot in the center of creation where new suns are born.
Anonymous
No.163339
>>163334
Incorrect, /vx/ bump limits were removed
Anonymous
No.163341
163343
i came.png
>>163335
>It's unhealthy for threads to go on this long.
What happen? Is truth too hard for ya?
Anonymous
No.163342
163344
Imagine being so ignorant that you insulate yourself from your own incompetence and then smugly shove it in everyone's face, under the pretemse that everyone ELSE is stupid.
Anonymous
No.163343
>>163341
No, it's that threads dragging on for a long time without being remade causes decline in discussion quality within those threads.
I was referring more to the main board though.
Anonymous
No.163344
>>163342
Better you should prove Earth is round. Can ya?
Anonymous
No.163346
>163344

>>159481
Waiting on you sweet-cheeks
Anonymous
No.163348
163350
https://youtu.be/MYnjzsjeMK8
Anonymous
No.163349
163350
https://youtu.be/313icHT2XF8
Anonymous
No.163350
163351 163357
rgzdgrd.png
>>163348
>>163349
Do you realize the huge effort NASA and its followers are putting to shut up just a tiny minority who disagree? Quite remarkable. Isn't it?
Anonymous
No.163351
163353
>>163350
>You do realize theres alot of people telling me Im an idiot
Maybe, just maybe, you ARE an idiot
Anonymous
No.163353
163356
80c1.png
>>163351
Name calling doesn't make Earth a ball.
Try again with facts next time.
Anonymous
No.163354
163355
833357.png
BB46398162E4FD4E912CF64A7E03EC8E-106791.png
Behold, spacetime.
Anonymous
No.163355
>>163354
The Ponker Po
Anonymous
No.163356
>>163353
Well every time I do you either cant comprehend them, call the authors/videographers names, or outright ignore incontravertable evidence. So no, you get what you fucking deserve
Anonymous
No.163357
>>163350
>huge effort
Not really.
Anonymous
No.163361
163362 163363
https://youtu.be/Lw4JMl1sErY
Anonymous
No.163362
>>163361
>Flat Earth Society
>controlled opposition
Take a hike, shill.
Anonymous
No.163363
163364
maxresdefault.jpg
>>163361
>low effort shilling
You have to come with something more creative. For example explain why there is not curve at all.
Anonymous
No.163364
>>163363
Why would I lie though?
Anonymous
No.163365
163366 163482 163831
File (hide): D329AF7AF4CAE71FA5615D91217EA489-2327297.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:632x480 Length:00:02:00, Transoceanic flights prove a flat earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Transoceanic flights prove a flat earth.mp4
Transoceanic flights prove a flat earth.
Anonymous
No.163366
163367
>>163365
>trans-atlantic flights dont go direct from the bottom of africa to australia
>flat earth is the ONLY explanation
Literally lmao rn, ty
Anonymous
No.163367
163368
>>163366
>unable to connect the dots
(You) must be college educated.
Anonymous
No.163368
163369
>>163367
>music and psychology
Guilty
So, in your 'dot connecting', where does profit motive apply?
Anonymous
No.163369
163370
>>163368
>music and psycholog
You don't qualify to evaluate even physics 101. That said, read a book nigger.
Anonymous
No.163370
163372
>>163369
Oh, thays just college. That is what you said, college.
I got my engineering creds - which people actually pay me money for, enough to have employees, no less - from a trade school. But, accredation is an appeal to authority argument, and has no bearing on the discussion.
And speaking of no bearing on the discussion, in an ironic parallel to ITT, here's the latest Flat Earth Fridays!
Credit, I was oblivious to Sci Man Dan until this thread showed up
https://youtu.be/2huZYKlAdVQ
Anonymous
No.163372
>>163370
>Sci Dan
That paid shill together with all NASA spoke persons won't debate Eric Dubay. There has to be a reason for them not to take that golden opportunity to shame and discredit the Flat Earth poster boy.
Interestingly, the same scenario applies to holohoax propagandists who always decline to debate holohoax debunkers.
Anonymous
No.163376
163377 163379
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDy95_eNPzM
Flatty's cannot dispute this.
Anonymous
No.163377
>>163376
>Flatty's cannot dispute this.
Interesting details. And yet heliocentrism is not holding water, the announced curve cannot be found, then the globe is a fantasy.
Anonymous
No.163379
163383
>>163376
As usual, surely Globebuster made an answer video to the glober. Videos of answer and counter-answers (polemic) populate jew-tube. By posting that Sci-fi Dan video, you are posting a partial view on the subject.
Take in count that OP refrains from posting this kind of crap and sticks to the facts.
Anonymous
No.163383
164877
136925FE922672BB94D224D49018916D-4095225.jpg
>>163379
>sci fi dan
Ngl, thats hilarious, cuz its not wrong. Still, this is the flat earth thread so this is where such content applies, whether in support or in contest of flat earth ahem theory. Gives an idea, actually; youll see.
>based nasaponr
Anonymous
No.163405
164571 165790
https://youtu.be/zixc8eojZdg
Heres a 25 minute video showing the very slow process of a distant supertanker deacending over the horizon.
Pay specific attention to how OP reacts to yet more incontravertable visual evidence of curvature
Recommended at 2x speed
Anonymous
No.163482
163525 164825
Flight_Map_High_Res.jpg
>>163017
Because the sensors are square. But the lens does add barrel distortion, it's just slight enough in most cases that you don't notice it. In 3D renders people add in fake distortion to make it look more realistic

Actual photo of a straight building
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SpyTP7rdwv6N-cA9VToYfBIS8yj6lg5Py2XfOeo488Q/edit#slide=id.g141444f9b3_1_251

>>163365
The reasoning for this could be as simple as the winds being strong or them not wanting to risk having a problem while being in the middle of nowhere to land. But I'm guessing there's also some economy to it, since flights aren't always simple A to B but can have people going to multiple different destinations and if you go a path that's close to many others you can make dropoffs for all of those places, and load on new passengers, places probably more worthwhile than Africa

How do you explain flight paths being curved most of the time? Including, yes, when they do actually go from Africa to South America or Australia
Anonymous
No.163507
163508 163509
If you flattys get some flat earth bitch to suck my cock I might start shilling for it.
Anonymous
No.163508
163510
>>163507
Die in fire
>t. globey
Anonymous
No.163509
163510
deal with it.jpg
>>163507
And yet, this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.163510
163511
>>163508
Rude
>>163509
It could be for a price, until then it's round.
Anonymous
No.163511
163512
>>163510
>until then it's round.
Prove it!
Anonymous
No.163512
163513
>>163511
The Burden of Proof is on (you) by the way don't just say "Hurr Look at da thread"
People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.
Anonymous
No.163513
163514 163524
>>163512
>People in the middle ages didn't even believe it's flat.
Not true.
What you call "people" were a bunch of freemason satanists spouting kabbala teachings. Heliocentrism is opposed to the our natural senses and is debunked by experimentation.
Real "people" from before and after the middle ages knew Earth is flat.
Anonymous
No.163514
163515
>>163513
Why would freemasons waste so many resources from the middle ages up until the present trying to convince everyone that the planet we are on is flat?
Anonymous
No.163515
163516
>>163514
>b-but why?
See >>149734
Anonymous
No.163516
163517
>>163515
>meme arrow instead of just telling me
>linking to a 30 minute video without timestamps
C'mon you gotta do better than that if you want to convince me.
Anonymous
No.163517
163518
File (hide): 8DD6B3D364D3B6E0EBB4F13E9F350B5A-3541715.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:57, Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anti-Flat Earth Defense Mechanisms_EDIT.mp4
>>163516
>B-but.. why?
>linking to a 30 minute video without timestamps
I knew it. You won't do any research whatsoever.
Anonymous
No.163518
163520
>>163517
>More meme arrows instead of just telling me why the masons would waste their most precious recourses on perpetuating a scam on a global magnitude
You know. if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answer
Anonymous
No.163520
163522 163524
>>163518
>if I asked some /pol/ack why jews do what they do he could give me a straight answer
Sadly I can't give you a pol/ack answer, it is forbidden by rule #7.
Anonymous
No.163522
163523
F9A2E302C8331EFDE95815424AB09CB3-533480.png
>>163520
>*Snap*
Yep, you're a retard.
Anonymous
No.163523
163524
>>163522
Hardly when it is you who won't research and choose to parrot heliocentric falsehoods.
Anonymous
No.163524
>>163513
>mideval freemasons
Please, PLEASE attempt to validate this point, I beg (you).
>>163520
>I cant cuz da roolz
Uhm,... what?
>>163523
No no, you opened this can of worms.
How do site rules prohibit you from simply answering the question?
>inb4 the site is staffed by masons
Anonymous
No.163525
163704
let_s_party__by_quizia_d93v0du.png
I wish IDs were turned on so I could call out the faggot(s) that ignore my points whenever I post them in reply to some dumb meme they post. >>163482 >>163311 >>162824 >>162790 still waiting

The threads all dumb memes and bickering about "AD HOMINIM" or "BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU" because the flat earth fags can't do anything else
Anonymous
No.163538
163690
Its friday!
https://youtu.be/Zd18XUO2StM
Anonymous
No.163685
163690
Today's Flat Eart Friday was boring, just some loon reeeeing about how video of the International Space station can't be real cuz this one guy's collar moves at this point, and how its probably a green screen in spite of them passing a floating microphone around.
So instead, here's a vid where Sci Dan and Prof. Dave go over the main proofs from Dave's debate with "DITRH", for those who dont comprehend the citations.
https://youtu.be/26UkTow1RRo
Original post
>>163010
Anonymous
No.163690
163697 163701
hqdefault.jpg
>>163538
>>163685
>Sci-Fi Dan
And yet, how come the curvature can't be found?

>33.63 miles No curvature..Again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6kOOvNLuGY
Anonymous
No.163697
163699 163703
>>163690
I trust you're going to pretend all the proofs posted in your absence dont exist?
Anonymous
No.163699
>>163697
>all the proofs posted
Seriously?
Any pseudo proof is rendered null if not a curve is found.
Anonymous
No.163700
>>158063
Try to comprehend it this time
Anonymous
No.163701
163704
>>163690
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.163703
>>163697
Sorry fren but there is point where you have to face the Plane.
Anonymous
No.163704
163781
>>163701
How come its only in obscure locations and by dodgy indivoduals that results like this manifest? How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature? Like the 15deg tilt gauge incident?
Ahem
>>163525
Anonymous
No.163781
163783
>>163704
>How come when there are proper controls, equipment, and documentation, the results show curvature?
Simple, if the faggots doing the measurements and equipment are paid by the occupiers in power, the results will always be the same lies.
Independent research discovers what the globe religion won't tell.
Anonymous
No.163782
File (hide): FA7ECB719BF6594643DE91C980C59CA8-1516181.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:59, FLAT EARTH IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNIA.mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH IN THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNIA.mp4
Dome.
Anonymous
No.163783
163785
>>163781
I get it now. Flat Earth is conceptually a hierarchy structured around scientific invompetence (umbrella term representing the various fields that unanimously, cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earth), where the greater one's assertiveness and incompetence, the further 'up' the hierarchy.
Anonymous
No.163785
163786
World_location_map_(equirectangular_180).svg.png
>>163783
>cohesively, and uniformly present an array of results among them a spherical earth
Most of those results are not valid at all as the (((occupiers))) won't allow travel beyond the 60th Parallel and claim a monopoly on ship's traffic rights.
Anonymous
No.163786
163790
>>163785
speaking of Antarctica and/or "the Antarctic Ice Wall" lol
IF the flat earth pizza were a thing
THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.
Anonymous
No.163787
Oekaki.png
In a globe, the upper hemisphere is equidistant to the lower hemisphere.
In a flat earth, the upper hemisphere is a fraction of the distance around the same latitudinal position
Anonymous
No.163788
163790
Oekaki.png
>flat earth
The circumference of the line closer to the north pole is much less than the like that goes near the ice wall, represented by the border. And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
Anonymous
No.163790
163795
>>163786
>THEN the length of distance in the lower hemisphere to circumnavigate the planet would be vastly greater than the distance to circumnavigate the planet in the upper hemisphere, exponentially so.
That's correct.
Search for captain Cook in this thread, he sailed like 70,000 miles trying to go around Antarctica, but he couldn't cos' Earth is a plane.

>>163788
And yet, is this reflected in navigation?
Everyday.
Search for flying routes in this thread.
Anonymous
No.163795
163796 163826 163831
>>163790
>Navigation
Planes are based on profit motive, of getting as many people from everywhere to everywhere else. Its not like when you buy a plane ticket they fly ONLY YOU nonstop to wherever, unless you charter a plane for ~1.5 million. The failure to grasp how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans is one of your most laugable bits of incompetence.
>Cook
Yes, your idiocy on that has already been addressed. Heres the reminder!
>>149629

>Cook
>149629
Anonymous
No.163796
163811
>>163795
>how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans
Are you implying that all air traffic control and navigators have successfully been bribed into concealing the shape of the earth?
Anonymous
No.163811
163833
US Navy Missile Instructor Proof of Service - Flat Earth - Mark Sargent.webm
>>163796
>denial plus sticking to the brainwashing programming
Let us check what some technical guy has to say out:

>US Navy Missile Instructor Proof of Service - Flat Earth - Mark Sargent
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Z5jWs-xZiaE
Mark Sargent is a Flat Earth researcher and cat is out of the bag.
Anonymous
No.163812
163813
flat earth models.jpeg
121MegamodelDec2021007.jpeg
26_014_900x.jpeg
100April2021046_900x.jpeg
100April2021085_900x.jpeg
Allow me to shill some Firmament models.
Not mine but they are cool nevertheless
https://flatearthmodels.com/
Anonymous
No.163813
orrery.png
>>163812
Orreries are cooler.
Anonymous
No.163815
Screenshot_20220602-225621_DuckDuckGo.jpg
According to flat earth, the distance between blue x and y, and red x and y is:
A. the same
B. blue is greater distance than red
C. red is greater than blue
D. omfg, masonic nasa shill
Anonymous
No.163816
163823
fe 1.png
fe 2.png
fe 3.png
fe 4.png
fe 5.png

Anonymous
No.163822
Its friday again! Today's FEF starts off with Bob proving the planet's rotation!
https://youtu.be/CXylB6HPHRk
Anonymous
No.163823
>>163816
These are the worst and most retarded memes I have ever seen.
Anonymous
No.163824
163902
>>148613
Maybe Flat Earth is a CIA PsyOp to make legitimate conspiracies look silly by comparison.

Radio towers are tall because short ones aren't as good. Shoet ones aren't as good because the earth is round.

Catapult and Trebuchet users centuries ago accounted for the curvature of the earth when calculating and aiming because the earth is round.

We have seen space.

We have landed shit on asteroids.

We have launched sattelites into space and used them, so we know they are there.

The planet is a round speck in a vast ocean of astral bullshit. Sorry, but we are not a flat plane rotating on the back of four elephants on the back of a turtle.
Anonymous
No.163825
163827
>>158065
>>159492
>If you believe Earth is round because a local optical effect on perspective, then you have a loooooooong way before to come to your senses.
Could you elaborate a little on this? I'm genuinely curious. I see that after your response to the photos in question nobody else bothered to reply to your reply instead opted to pretend as if you didn't answer. I'm neither pro nor against flat earth. The scientific community is indeed a bunch of liars and I gain nothing from being loyal to them, however, just believing in a flat earth to spite them isn't something I'm gonna do.

So, I'm genuinely curious here. When you talk about the optical effect on perspective I assume that you're talking about how things get smaller the further away they are from you. But some of these ships' hulls seem to be out of view. Either the ships are way too submerged or we don't see the hull because there's water in the way. This could be explained by the idea that there's curvature and that there becomes a hill of water that cut off the line of sight. At the same time, if this was true you'd expect the ships' poles and cargo to be slightly angled away from you.
All of this is taken by a camera. I have seen the video that's somewhere in this thread about a nikon camera that zoomed in so far that it got a view of the islands and cities despite the fact that the formula for the curvature so has obstructed them. Don't remember if those cities were submerged though.

What are your thoughts?
Anonymous
No.163826
163827
409.png
426.png
>>163795
>Planes are based on profit motive, of getting as many people from everywhere to everywhere else. Its not like when you buy a plane ticket they fly ONLY YOU nonstop to wherever, unless you charter a plane for ~1.5 million. The failure to grasp how profit motive affects air traffic and flight plans is one of your most laugable bits of incompetence.
Yeah, right.
Anonymous
No.163827
>>163826
>my disbelief is an argument
Meanwhile, notice how the flat earth model involves exponentially more area between continents, the closer one gets to the perimeter. What this means is, flat earthers have to explain why the planet doesnt reflect this in geography.
>>163825
Or just answer this guy's question
Anonymous
No.163828
163830
Ill reiterate, simplified.

If thr flat earth map has any legitimacy, you would be ablr to measure an increase in the amount of area between longitudinal degrees, the further one gets from the north pole.
Anonymous
No.163829
Ill also point out how it makes MORE sense for a plane to fly halfway across the world when going to the next continent over, to a flat earther
Anonymous
No.163830
>>163828
>If thr flat earth map has any legitimacy
It looks legit enough to me >>149243
Anonymous
No.163831
163832
>>163795
>Planes are based on profit motive
Absolutely, and yet their fly paths across the oceans make not sense at all, at least... our realm is a plane. >>163365
Anonymous
No.163832
>>163831
>they dont make sense
Only if you're a mong. It makes sense to anyone who has ever had to work out product sourcing and distribution
Anonymous
No.163833
163835
>>163811
You didn't answer my question.
Anonymous
No.163835
163836
>>163833
Dude, your "science" doesn't add up. There is not any curve and sticking to the lies makes you look a shill or the dumbest on this plane. See >>149168
Anonymous
No.163836
163837
>>163835
>implying if you ask questions you're a shill
I didn't cite any "science", faggot. I just asked a basic question.
Anonymous
No.163837
163838 163844
>>163836
>I didn't cite any "science", faggot
All your premise is founded on the globe religion which is based on fake science. If you dispute the Plane, then your are talking about science, actually fake science.
Anonymous
No.163838
>>163837
Wtf does any of that have to do with what I asked?
Anonymous
No.163839
163840
What dumb nigger decided that this thread didn't need IDs? It's the only thread on /vx/ that would actually benefit from IDs.
Anonymous
No.163840
163841
>>163839
>IDs
Actually it is useless, these kikes jump IP like rabbits and to pinpoint them would be an impossible task.
Anonymous
No.163841
163842
>>163840
>implying IDs are useless because shitposter evade them
By that logic, we should remove IDs from the site entirely because the concept of them would be flawed.
IDs make it more difficult to change between contradictory points and sockpuppet mid-conversation, or at least add extra steps to do so.

We put IDs on /vx/ despite the fact that neither /v/, /x/, /tg/, /vg/, /mlp/, or even /int/ have them, perhaps even to the detriment of those elements, just to police /pol/-tier shitposting arguments. Threads with these kinds of arguments should always have IDs.
Anonymous
No.163842
163843
>>163841
>shitposter
Globe shills.
Anonymous
No.163843
>>163842
There are shitposters on both sides, but it's impossible to have even a /pol/-tier conversation because there's no IDs.
Anonymous
No.163844
163847
>>163837
I only asked about the implication of navigators being bribed, because I thought it might be interesting. I didn't say anything for or against the flat earth in that question.
Anonymous
No.163845
Leonardo DiCaprio, Pope Francis, and the Flat Earth picture.webm
Freemasonry-and-Hollywood.jpg
>Leonardo DiCaprio, Pope Francis, and the Flat Earth picture
it tells you everything to need to know about the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.163847
163848
>>163844
>navigators being bribed,
There are plenty of videos where pilots state that Earth is flat.
Anonymous
No.163848
163849
>>163847
Okay, but what about the ones that don't, or the ones that say the contrary?
Anonymous
No.163849
163850
>>163848
I think it is the same case of doctors and nurses that recommended poisonous injections to the public because of the sweet money.
Anonymous
No.163850
163851
>>163849
In every country though? Who would be paying them?
Anonymous
No.163851
163852 163853
upset.gif
>>163850
I sense the jew is back. Asking questions and shooting whataboutisms.
This is /vx/, back to /mlpol/ schlomo.
Anonymous
No.163852
>>163851
>Asking questions
>implying asking questions somehow makes me a kike
If you don't know, just say you don't fucking know.
>whataboutisms
Where did "what about" appear in any of my posts? All I did was ask you to elaborate.
Anonymous
No.163853
163854
>>163851
>This is /vx/, back to /mlpol/
You know, just because it's /vx/ doesn't mean people might not want actual arguments or want their questions answered seriously. That kind of stuff doesn't stand on /x/ either.
Anonymous
No.163854
163856 163860
>>163853
>doesn't mean people might not want actual arguments or want their questions answered seriously.
There is not good faith in you.
Anonymous
No.163855
File (hide): 65E2084A8E84EC788745324F3CE9714A-6809132.webm (6.5 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:00, Flat Earth sun in 2018 AO commerical.webm) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth sun in 2018 AO commerical.webm

Anonymous
No.163856
163857
>>163854
You're accusing me of bad faith, when all you did was sling a series of ad homenim calling me a shill instead of answering my questions? What am I supposed to say to get my questions answered?
Anonymous
No.163857
163860
5202337810_95a1e00232_z-300x225.jpg
>>163856
You have plenty of evidence that the ball is a lie. Go on, tell me that you are not arguing in bad faith.
Anonymous
No.163858
3E9B6EA3713590CA28F625C4CFAF2FB1-32599.png
AE14EE1DF86237F53183B44B05696597-1917868.png
FA365D636D47843896738C7D4DBA1EF7-62407.jpg
2209563.gif
All this stuff just to make a strawman for being rebuked.
Thanks for being being the whole circus I suppose.
But if you are genuine about not curved Earth just stop being a cock sucking garggle blasting fag. Simple, but for you it may not be easy.
Anonymous
No.163859
424.png
>Flat Earth, the sun, and mountains 175 miles away - case closed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqsT2dRCbTg
Anonymous
No.163860
163861
>>163854
I asked you a question to give you the opportunity to explain your worldview. I didn't make any technical or fake "scientific" arguments, I just asked a question about a claim that seemed worthy of skepticism.
If skepticism isn't "good faith" to you, then I must be wasting my time here.
>>163857
I wasn't asking about the fucking ball, I was asking about navigators and pilots being systemically bribed to keep it a secret.
Anonymous
No.163861
163862
>>163860
>coping
Sorry, recognize your loss, this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.163862
163863 163865
my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif
>>163861
>missing the point
>still won't answer basic fucking questions
>no reading comprehension whatsoever
You know, I really was giving you the benefit of the doubt, because I really am open to the prospect that kikes and corporations really could be keeping big secrets about the geography of Antarctica and even the rest of the world, and I thought that was worth discussing, but I now see that I'm dealing with an asinine retard incapable of holding a conversation without resorting to reddit-tier shitflinging.
Sorry for wasting your time. I'll go back to ignoring this shitty thread.
Anonymous
No.163863
163867
>>163862
>I'll go back to ignoring this shitty thread.
Thank you.
Anonymous
No.163864
Gamer Asmongold does a real time Flat Earth poll, and guess what.webm
>Gamer Asmongold does a real time Flat Earth poll, and guess what.
KEK
Anonymous
No.163865
163866
>>163862
>thinking the flatty will argue in good faith, or acknowledge legitimate refutation
Adorable
Anonymous
No.163866
163867
4ate4.png
>>163865
>legitimate refutation
Preposterous.
Anonymous
No.163867
163868
>>163866
Preposterous he says, carefully ignoring every argument that he can't refute, which are many and multi-genre.
Whether from actual incompetence or actual malice, it is clear that you are incapable of arguing in good faith. It seems a clear case of intellectual dishonesty, whatever the cause may be, but you'll continue to posture-post ponies because in your mind thaTs what making an argument is.
>B but, a bunch of WOW-streamer simps are retarded and think the earth is flat!
Yes, it takes a particular type of retardation to follow WoW streamers in current year. Small wonder that half his audience fits the bill. They could still be trolling though.
>>163863
But THIS one is my favorite. Here you have an unobstructed admission from the flatty.
He doesnt want discussion, he doesnt want to dissect the idea and discern truth from fiction, he wants an echo-chamber thread where he can post his tripe and rub circles in his own back about how right he is, nevermind the endless list of phenomena that very clearly illustrate that he's full of shit, has never known what he's talking about, and has the most pathetic grasp of physical dynamics while claiming an 'engineering background, lol, and anyone ELSE should kindly gtfo so he can get back to his FB-tier 'memes'
This has been a public service announcement
Anonymous
No.163868
163869
wFE.png
>>163867
Anonymous
No.163869
163870
>>163868
Cope and seethe, the earth is spherical no matter the level of ignorance you adopt
Anonymous
No.163870
163871 163872
7.png
>>163869
>the earth is spherical
Anonymous
No.163871
163873
>>163870
Theres that pone-posturing I mentioned. Cope and seethe faggot, you're wrong, ad the only reason you dont know it 8s b3cause you insulate yourself with incompet3nce.
Anonymous
No.163872
163873 163874
>>163870
While not intending to, the pone-posturing speaks to another phenomenon that is readily observed in the horsefucker community;
The 'I found a pony reaction image, your argument is therefore invalid' pretense. The idea being overtly, "I can present Twilight(example) in a meme that doubts your position, therefore it's invalid".
The problem is that, this 'argument' neglects the basic requirements of an argument; to indicate invalidity with position(s), and to present a counter-argument with facts.
One may note that this is why the flatty wont argue facts, excepting those 'observed' and recorded by dodgy individuals who have been laughed out of any critical assessment.
But the flatty isnt vying for anything authoritative, no, he is quite content simply to muddy the water; it is well enough for him to suggest that there is legitimate grounds to contest the uni ersal findings that uniformly depict a spherical earth, BECAUSE there are none again, I cant conclude what level of dishonesty that OP is operating from but hes "just so skeptical of nasa masons".
I literally cant ironically parody at that point,.
But to this post's point, its really just a reiteration of the rule about one's carefully worded arguments being sumarrily ignored.
Welcome to the flat earth thread, where feelings dont care about your facts.
Anonymous
No.163873
163875
9394.png
>>163871
>>163872
>pone-posturing
Do you know where you are?
Anonymous
No.163874
cb7.png
>>163872
>Welcome to the flat earth thread, where feelings dont care about your facts.
Anonymous
No.163875
>>163873
Do you? Do you think 'if I post a pony, theres legitimacy to my post'? Do you think 'if I post a pony, then my illegitimate post is somehow legitimate'?
Post all the ponies you want, you're STILL never gonna have a leg to stand on, intellectually.
Anonymous
No.163876
163877 163879 163880
you'd think someone would just fly over antarctica and shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Anonymous
No.163877
163880
>>163876
>shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Actually it will blow it out.
Anonymous
No.163878
d7ifcrl1dvw81.png

Anonymous
No.163879
>>163876
Your argument assumes that the flat earth hasnt been exhaustively debunked previously, except it has. All that remains are flat earthers who can't comprehend the evidence, which unsurprisingly is a gradually increasing number, as the standard of education likewise gradually decreases.
Show people a picture of Earth, its dismissed as CGI. Cite that the picture predates computer generated imagery, its dismissed as Nasa/masonic shilling.
The proof is already there. Its BEEN there since BEFORE any of us were even BORN. Theres more proof than there are technical analysts to explain its VALIDITY as proof.
Which leads one inexorably to the conclusion that Flat Earth has never been about truth. Hence why I say:
Flat Earth is an INcompetence hierarchy
Anonymous
No.163880
>>163876
>>163877
Apologies, I only touched on Antarctica. Funny you propose this, because there is an experienced pilot who is organizing just that.
The thing about a flight over the southern pole is, it takes a particular setup to accomplish. Being as though there arent commercial airstrips on Antarctica, not just ANY plane will do. It requires a plane with the logistical capacity to make the entire trip WITHOUT refueling. Remember when I said 1.5 million chartered? Thats because thats what it is going to cost to charter a provate plane capable of making the flight (and that is WITH the pilot doing the flying for no charge).
Now, flatties LOVE to point to Antarctica because of their certainty of an ice wall. At least, thats the NOT-disingenuous flatties.
Meanwhile, there are the flatty grifters who realize that its bullshit, but their name and livelihood is tied to the flat earth theory (DITRH, etc.) and so they are dug in at 'Antartica' because "no one could possibly expend that much time/resources/effort to fly over Antartica". Meaning, as long as no one DOES, they can continue to posture and act, regardless of the level of intellectual dishonesty they are operating from.
Recall, I already told you whats on Antarctica, and why the international treaty became a thing; its evidence of a megalithic human civilization/technology that defies the historical record to such a degree that the control systems would implode if readily known.
Spoiler alert, its not the masons nor NASA at the heart of it, its the CHURCH.
Anonymous
No.163881
163882
I wrote a long post but happened ot deleteed it. Oh, well. I might rewrite it but the gist of it is that I don't see why we should be fighting. Let us just discuss this impersonal and on topic that goes for both sides to different extents perhaps but still.
Anonymous
No.163882
>>163881
I'll come back and rewrite this. I have reasons for what I'm saying and I don't really know if this short post gives enough context.
Anonymous
No.163884
163886
6aa7892f727325f7.png

Anonymous
No.163886
163887 163890
>>163884
Fake NASA shill, the sun doesnt go behind the earth, it rotates above it. This is clearly intended to undermine flat earth progress in the worldview.
Im false flagging as a/the flatty, if it doesnt come across
Anonymous
No.163887
163888 163889
File (hide): 02D93F38DF2456EE5C3E33B1761BC0B0-11303627.mp4 (10.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:47, Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4
>>163886
>NASA
Well, zog told everybody but normies can't help themselves.
Anonymous
No.163888
163890
>>163887
Fake and shilling. Clearly, since the earth is flat, that any claims of curvature are false.
Cuz the earth is flat.
Checkmate globies.
The earth is FLAT
Anonymous
No.163889
163890
>>163887
Zog convinced everyone that the flat earth is ROUND cuz they're Satanists, and who u gonna believe, satanists or ME who says what god says cuz I say that god says what I say = flat earth, checkmate atheists.
Anonymous
No.163890
163891 163892
>>163888
>>163889
>>163886
Wow, this is just what OP has said throughout this entire thread and not butchered at all. You guys are comedy geniuses.
Anonymous
No.163891
163892 163895
Premiere_063.jpeg
>>163890
>Shills
They (or it?) are applying textbook masonic tactics for gaslighting.
They state exactly what the opposite side says with a tone of incredulity and sometimes mixed with sarcasm in an attempt to discredit and to diminish validity. That said, they will avoid to draw attention to the fact that utterly demolish the whole heliocentric model: the curve can't be found.
Anonymous
No.163892
>>163890
Experience
>>163891
Except for the pics I posted months ago, which you wont touch,... cuz totaly not btfo, couldnt be that...
And my posts aside, you're about 24 citations behind, asfar
as 'refuting' a spherical earth or 'asserting' a flat one
Anonymous
No.163893
163896
fe 1.png
fe 2.png
fe 3.png
fe 4.png
fe 5.png

Anonymous
No.163894
fe 6.png
fe 7.png
fe 8.png
fe 9.png
fe 10.png

Anonymous
No.163895
>>163891
>Shills
>Implying
You sound like /ptg/ calling everyone a 'shill' for disagreeing with you in a flat earth thread on this tiny board.
Anonymous
No.163896
163897
>>163893
Nobody calls flat earthers hateful. They just call them dumb.
Anonymous
No.163897
163898
>>163896
I suppose so but people do call nazis dumb as well so I wouldn't put much stock in what people say.
Anonymous
No.163898
163899
>>163897
Yeah, although I feel like it's a false equivalency. People call Nazis dumb sometimes, but I seldom hear anyone call flat earthers hateful, unless they want to associate them with another group.
Anonymous
No.163899
>>163898
Yeah, we agree on this. I never heard anyone call flat earthers hateful and I don't see how one would argue that they are.
>it's a false equivalency
I think you misunderstood. I meant that people say that everyone that disagrees with consensus is dumb so if you meant, which isn't clear from your post, to appeal to their authority then I disagree that they have one.
This post got a bit overwritten but you get me.
Anonymous
No.163901
163902
Was the post about catapults deleted?
Anonymous
No.163902
>>163901
>catapults
Here >>163824
Anonymous
No.163903
163904
42.png
>Coach Redpill
>2022.06.06 Physics and Epistemic Viciousness
>Dark Matter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHI_eSsgTF4
This is a commentary on the science "experts" who make shit up and sustain lies in order to keep their jobs.
Anonymous
No.163904
163905
>>163903
Dark matter is just a theory, a disputed theory.
Anonymous
No.163905
163908
>>163904
Same than gravity.
Anonymous
No.163908
163940 164141
tn1a6s1y3qd41.jpg
>>163905
Well, I guess you could say that.
In truth, a group of scientists came up with Dark Matter because they considered it to be the only explanation for why gravity seems to function differently at the far edges of the galaxy, as if some extra invisible mass were weighing things down and holding stars together. It's not a theory without merit, as there could be plenty of things beyond this world that we're not able to perceive, but an alternative mode of thought would be that perhaps the laws of physics simply aren't consistent throughout all of the vastness of space.
There are of course other theories to explain this. I think String Theory gives an alternative to it.
Anonymous
No.163940
>>163908
>meme
It sums it all.
Anonymous
No.164025
905.jpg
t7qUo9u.jpeg

Anonymous
No.164027
164028 164029
Imagine being ruled by shitty memes
Seriously, imagine you couldnt think for yourself and had to rely on Facebook to do your thinking for you.
Now i.agine your FB-tier wtfe got btfo and you LITERALLY had no lrg to stand on, but had to pretend cuz 'shame is bad'.
How's that whole 'being a nonce' thing working for you, OP? Learned to differentiate between,.. oh Im kidding. OP doesnt want to actually THINK, he just wants to pretend so that the audience THINKS he's thinking.
But yes I am bad/evil/wtfe ur scripture says is 'bad'.
Keep not doing what you're told is bad. Thats 'healthy', Im told.
Anonymous
No.164028
164029 164030
>>164027
Imagine failing to sage shitty threads.
Anonymous
No.164029
vvvtc34.png
>>164027
>>164028
Ah, (you).
Anonymous
No.164030
164031
>>164028
Imagine thinking that a neglecting of sage was happenstance
Anonymous
No.164031
164032 164033
>>164030
Imagine bumping threads that shit up the board.
Anonymous
No.164032
478.jpg
>>164031
Anonymous
No.164033
>>164031
Imagine wanting the board clean for all the..............

............
nothing
Anonymous
No.164034
If the earth isn't flat why do flights from USA to Japan take time?
Anonymous
No.164035
164036 164037
maxresdefault.jpg
20.png
>PhD Proves Globe Model False (4:34 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6J7WDjXouc
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/phd-proves-globe-model-false-re-uploaded:1
Anonymous
No.164036
164354
Screenshot_20220609-033336_DuckDuckGo.jpg
>>164035
Whoops, thats's embarrassing
Anonymous
No.164037
>>164035
Let me guess, you calculate Pi as 3.14, don't you?
Anonymous
No.164055
164056 164085
cpc.jpg
Hey OP, I was just in another one of my random information on the internet comas and I have a genuine question:
What causes the circumpolar current around the latitude of Drake's Passage (pic related on ball Earth)
Since there's no rotation, nor is there gravity, what would push this much water around?
Anonymous
No.164056
164057
>>164055
See >>163033
Anonymous
No.164057
164058 164059
>>164056
well, not quite. This explains the tides (kinda, I'm not entirely happy with "well, we don't know but its not the moon") but it doesn't explain the uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude. If tides were caused by the bobbing of the earth's surface in the ocean, as explained by Mr. Dubay, there would be a uniform reaction towards the ice wall, not round it. Think ripples in a pond.
Anonymous
No.164058
>>164057
I suppose I spoke too soon because I didn't finish the video, but even the second explanation of the world mountain and the whirlpool doesn't explain uniform motion around the poles. If this were the case, you'd see almost no circumpolar current, or a circumpolar current that reverses with the tides.
Anonymous
No.164059
164060
>>164057
>uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude
I guess we have to wait for access for independent researchers.
The freemason's "just trust us" is not cutting it any longer.
Anonymous
No.164060
164061
>>164059
Independent researchers are allowed to sail the Drake Passage and the circumpolar open ocean. In fact, Dubay references quite a few of them in his videos. Are you saying Dubay is referencing Masons?
Anonymous
No.164061
164062
>>164060
Don't play dumb, you perfectly know that I'm referring to the area under the 60th parallel, specifically Antarctica.
Anonymous
No.164062
164063
>>164061
I'm not. The circumpolar ocean current starts at the southern tip of South America.
Anonymous
No.164063
164064
>>164062
>starts
Says who?
Anonymous
No.164064
164065 164066
>>164063
Hendrik Brouwer (Dutch explorer who developed the route through the current in the early 1600s for spice trade with India)
James Cook (circumnavigated the polar region, iirc he's specifically mentioned by Dubay)
Vito Dumas did so single-handedly during WWII without any knowledge or assistance from world governments
I'll keep looking if you need more names
Anonymous
No.164065
>>164064
oh, and Jon Sanders of Australia has done it 11 times.
Anonymous
No.164066
164067
>>164064
Dude, I sailed the Drake channel 10 years ago two times, I know the place and is hell when choppy, the strong currents are normal because the waters accelerate at that point. Frequently and unexpected weather conditions are the norm, they change without warning in a matter of a couple of hours.
Anonymous
No.164067
164068
>>164066
have you circumnavigated at that latitude? All of these people mentioned (excepting Brouwer) did.
Anonymous
No.164068
164069
>>164067
>circumnavigated
Not circumnavigation, but circurm-continent voyage.
Anonymous
No.164069
164070
>>164068
so you went round Cape Horn. I'm... proud? of you? but by your reckoning you're missing about 50 thousand miles of journey.
Anonymous
No.164070
164071
>>164069
>Cape Horn
It is called Cabo the Hornos by the locals.
Anonymous
No.164071
164072 164075
>>164070
Sure. We're getting off track. I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into. Are you willing to do so, or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong?
Anonymous
No.164072
164073 164096
>>164071
>I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into
The only trusted source is your own eyes. Sailing there without interference.
Anonymous
No.164073
164074
>>164072
Then why reference all these ancient and modern sources when you haven't seen these things with your own eyes? This isn't a disputed fact. Your sources confirm it, my sources confirm it, ball earth sources confirm it, there's a current that goes steadly east to west round the world at the latitudes south of the three southern capes and north of Antarctica. Nobody disputes this that's been round the world at that latitude, including sources you yourself have put forward. Its established fact.
Anonymous
No.164074
>>164073
my apologies, steadily west to east. map dyslexia getting the better of me once again
Anonymous
No.164075
164076
>>164071
>or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong
Enough derailing, the chart is already established and clear faggot >>149243
By the way, that map is super accurate when using a sextant.
Anonymous
No.164076
164077
>>164075
okay, I'm not disputing the map, the shape of the earth, or any other point you've brought up. I simply want to know what your explanation is for an established, fairly stable circumpolar current (and I suppose the winds that go with it, but that's very likely explainable in your model by the motion of the water)
Anonymous
No.164077
164078 164097
>>164076
Again, independent research is needed.
Anonymous
No.164078
164079
>>164077
Independent research has been done and matches the facts I've presented. If its not independent enough for you, I'm terribly sorry, but if someone who is actively hiding from world governments (Vito Dumas) makes the claim, I'm going to call them independent
Anonymous
No.164079
164080 164097
8495.gif
>>164078
>Independent research has been done and matches the facts
Sure.
Anonymous
No.164080
164081
south-edged-equal-azimuth.jpg
>>164079
I accept your concession.

By the way, if you'd just said "it matches up when you view the whole oceanic current map in context of the flat earth" I would have probably taken you at face value, but you're so tied to the very few sources you have that you can't do independent research yourself.

I still don't know if your theory has any merit, but I'm 100% sure now that you, personally, do not.
Anonymous
No.164081
164082 164085
>>164080
In fact, I'm going to go absolutely top tier schizophrenic here and note a few things.
In this diagram, the redder a current, the warmer its water, and per established science, these are the surface currents, whilst cold blue currents are usually much deeper. IF your polar gyre exists, you could explain these currents as warm water being sucked into the pole from the surface, and cold water being pushed back down through the deep ocean. This removes the need for a "breathing" gyre and allows a much more plausible forceful, periodic underswell, possibly because this supposed northern polar whirlpool exists inland on the aforementioned 4 islands, and it "runs out" of water because its recycling effect exceeds the inflow of surface water. Since the land surface, per Dubay, rests ON the ocean, not on underlying crust, this allows for a massive inflow of water to the central reservoir, a relatively quick emptying of the reservoir _under_ the land surface, and a repeat.

There, I just answered your question for you, since you're completely incapable of independent thought.
Anonymous
No.164082
229.png
>>164081
Anonymous
No.164083
164086 164087
How remiss of me
https://youtu.be/7u61hzEG82s
Anonymous
No.164085
164090
>>164055
>>164081
Welcome to the flat earth thread
Anonymous
No.164086
164089 164095 164098
>>164083
>Sci-Fi Dan
A prominent NASA paid shill.
Anonymous
No.164087
164089 164093 164094
>>164083
C'mon, it is obvious that it is about to make fun of a dumbass that can barely articulate his thoughts.
The NASA ballers can rapidly extinguish the Flat Earth discoveries if debate is arranged, but, like the jews they won't do that and pick on low hanging fruits instead while claiming to be on the right.
Imagine if the negro tyson would debate Dubay, but... NASA knows that will be PR disaster.
Anonymous
No.164089
164091
>It hurts to Change your world view: The Thread
Flatters will cope forever.
>>164087
>>164086
>NASA
Nasa has no power you retards.
Anonymous
No.164090
>>164085
Thanks. The problem here seems to be that Dubay has an extremely compelling and calming voice. I watched his history of flat earth and I was honesty a little hooked until he went on his autistic tard rage about the flat earth society
Anonymous
No.164091
164092 164095
>>164089
>Nasa has no power you retards.
I disagree.
You believe all their lies, right?
Anonymous
No.164092
>>164091
Nigger what lies do they even tell?
Anonymous
No.164093
>>164087
>Tyson wont argue rhetoric with a virtual child cuz NASA is scared of the blowback
Imagine unironically thinking this
Anonymous
No.164094
>>164087
yes, acknowledging Dubay as worth debating would be a PR disaster
Anonymous
No.164095
164369
>>164086
>>164091
NASA had to sell all its infrastructure to Elon Musk and outsource its rocks to Russia to stay afloat, and it still can't get congress to fund any of its projects (gotta send that tax money to Israel for their space program instead). Wtf do you think they have the funding to do that?
Anonymous
No.164096
>>164072
>this much goalpost moving
So, you'll only accept direct, personal empirical evidence for ideas that challege your worldview, but you're willing to cite sketchy youtube videos for ones that reinforce it?
Talk about hypocrisy.
Anonymous
No.164097
164369
>>164077
>>164079
Define "independent research".
Anonymous
No.164098
164100 164369
>>164086
>NASA paid shill
Citation unironically needed. I wasted an hour looking for any real evidence of this.
Anonymous
No.164099
0b0fbfa14ac00ef11a6354bebaacd4d1--you-ve.jpg
OP is a retarded faggot.
Anonymous
No.164100
>>164098
welcome to the Flat Earth thread, where "paid shill" means "disagrees with my retarded ideology"
Anonymous
No.164117
164118 164121
bs.jpeg
I think this may fit here:

>Russian space chief speaks out on UFOs
https://www.sott.net/article/468677-Russian-space-chief-speaks-out-on-UFOs
Anonymous
No.164118
164119
>>164117
Well, in the last months the UFO psyop went into overdrive in the States, now the Russians join. Is any doubt left that they are together in the space deception?
Anonymous
No.164119
164120
image.png
>>164118
Anonymous
No.164120
fluffle-puff-gif-20.gif
>>164119
Anonymous
No.164121
img3487.jpeg
>>164117
Anonymous
No.164123
XVA3TlB_AzM.jpeg
>V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946) - (2:02 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVA3TlB_AzM
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/v-2-rocket-films-(flat)-earth-in-(1946):a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2XEoiKjE4kAJ/
Anonymous
No.164124
iiIpOs4FgwY.jpg
File (hide): D18735052A2F0A6F941188E72C6DEE14-5067431.mp4 (4.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:00, Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4
>Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.
Good music.
Anonymous
No.164125
164126 164127
>>148614
rate of rotation is not measured in mph.
The earth rotates at 7.29x10^-5 rads/s. Of course you can't feel it spinning. If you were on a roundabout that was spinning at that rate, you would not even be able to see it moving let alone feel anything.
Anonymous
No.164126
>>164125
>rate of rotation is not measured in mph
And yet on the surface and according to the freemasons we are moving at incredible speeds.
Anonymous
No.164127
164129
>>164125
You tried, but OP feels the best defense is a solid ignorance
Anonymous
No.164129
164145 164146
0a.jpg
>>164127
>You tried
Nope, that faggot is trying to obfuscate when bringing angular speeds which are supposedly constant.
Anonymous
No.164141
>>163908
Dark matter has exactly zero relavence to flat earth. Yes the models are incomplete this is known. But they are more than sufficient to describe our solar system. Even classic newtonian gravity is good enough for the most part.
Anonymous
No.164145
>>164129
Wait till he gets to the lack of comprehension that a sphereoid object has a dissimilar sloping curve depending on what longitude one observes the planet at, and that there is no 'single calculation' for the distance to the horizon
Anonymous
No.164146
Whoops, that was talking about >>164129
Anonymous
No.164319
upside.down_.roos_Flat_Earth_Images.jpg

Anonymous
No.164346
164368
File (hide): 327F787E97E751390F89DC5625570E6B-2970568.mp4 (2.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:41, The Flat Earth Psyop.mp4) [play once] [loop]
The Flat Earth Psyop.mp4
The Flat Earth Psyop?
Anonymous
No.164347
164350
Flat Eartherism is still a homosexual psyop designed to associate valuable theories with pseudoscientific "You can't convince me the earth isn't a flat plane" junk.

What value is there in pretending everyone's telescope is an optical illusion device, stars aren't real, the world's a flat plane surrounded by ice, and meteors are chemtrails?

There is evidence that GamerGate is right about the feminist infection in video games journalism, and journalism in general.

I know this is an old example, and the rot goes much deeper than feminism and video games. Feminist rot in games journalism is just a symptom of judaist rot in the media, the banks, academia, and more.

Why are the flat earthers even here, specifically? They can peddle their bullshit anywhere. They can talk about it on Twitter or Facebook. They don't get censored. No government monitors or shuts down their retarded Las Vegas conventions for people who think aliens abducted them. They aren't a threat to the Jewish globalists.

There are valuable political topics to be discussed here. Talking in circles with a flat earth believer is like talking in circles with a "Aliens are real and they probed my favourite celebrity's anus" believer. Ancient Aliens lied to you, there is no Easter Bunny and the superheroes you unironically pay to see in jewish cinemas while drinking corn syrup and AIDS-infused nigger semen were not inspired by half-alien half-Greek demiods who actually existed.
Anonymous
No.164348
flateartheree.jpg

Anonymous
No.164349
164351
heliocentric fallacy 0.png
heliocentric fallacy 1.png
heliocentric fallacy 2.png
heliocentric fallacy 3.png
heliocentric fallacy 4.png

Anonymous
No.164350
164351
Genesis-1-2.jpeg
>>164347
>Why are the flat earthers even here, specifically?
Dude, it is just an enclosed plane. No reason to get upset.
Anonymous
No.164351
164353
image.png
>>164349
It's easy to assume a position is the default truth and then pretend any disagreement, scrutiny, or doubt is "Making a claim that must be proven to my satisfaction", but what proof would satisfy a flat-earther?
>>164350
Any feelings you think I have are irrelevant to the question at hand. Why would flat earthers come HERE specifically, when they are permitted on facebook but anti-vax posts aren't?
Anonymous
No.164353
>>164351
>Why would flat earthers come HERE specifically
Say it with more precision: this is a containment bread that is not spilling to other boards, so, chillax fren.
Anonymous
No.164354
164356 164465 164471
dist0.png
dist1.png
dist2.png
>>164036
Have some moar.
Anonymous
No.164356
>>164354
Its a sphereoid retard, the radius varies. For example, the radius is greatest at the equator, and smallest at the north or south pole. Which is why you cant use a simplified equation to determine the distance to the visible horizon, you have to account for their specific location when calculating the distance to the visible horizon.
But rather than grasp why you (and the videographer) embarrassed yourself last time, you both decided to embarrass yourselves a second time. Thank you for that
Anonymous
No.164357
164358
0D560ACD45301EAFC689CF51E5CF9F03-253294.png
>pic related
Oof, that too is embarassing
Anonymous
No.164358
3eyftf6.jpg
>>164357
Anonymous
No.164366
164367
3KqrlM92kyFZWNWlvrrXsxvk_640x360.jpg
e02657.png
>ASTROPHYSICIST RAGE QUITS DURING INTERVIEW WITH UNDERCOVER FLAT EARTHER - (56:15 long)
>Svetlana Berdyugina PhD (Astro-Physicist) - interesting stuff ...
>It doesn't matter how good your grades are or if you have a high IQ. If you lack logic, reason or commonsense you're fucking stupid!
>Too many SMEs (Subject Matter Experts) are fucked up and trapped in their model. This drives their worldview - she says we'll find life out there and we will then know we are not alone and We are not special.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vUu7DdxZOnUT/
Anonymous
No.164367
164382
>>164366
>I cant be arsed to respond to 80% of the rebuttals ITT, but HERE globeys, explain this ONE cherry-picked nutter
Anonymous
No.164368
>>164346
>the glove is mental insurance that there is no creator
Where does this idea even come from? How is that supposed to stop people from believing in God?
Anonymous
No.164369
164383 164403
>>164095
>>164097
>>164098
Still no answer to these?
Anonymous
No.164379
164384 164389
Heliocentric theory vs Theocentricism.jpeg
Heliocentric theory vs Theocentricism.
Anonymous
No.164382
vL2GE7YePAc.jpg
>>164367
Anonymous
No.164383

This is what flatties consider a 'rebuttal'.
>>164369
Get used to it, and welcome to the flat earth thread; where OP will disregard/ignore every point that refutes his premise, fuck off for days/weeks, and then reappear with FB-tier memes and videos, posturing that his lack of scientific comprehension is proof of a flat earth.
Anonymous
No.164384
164385
>>164379
What is theocentrism?
Anonymous
No.164385
164386 164466
3erdfcws.jpeg
>>164384
>lazy nigger
Anonymous
No.164386
164387 164394 164466
>>164385
Let me reiterate. What is theocentrism supposed to mean in this context?
No part of the definition is necessarily opposed to heliocentrism, or in any way equivalent to geocentrism.
Anonymous
No.164387
164388
>>164386
I think the difference is Anon's theories versus Celestia's creation.
Anon can speculate all day long, but Celestia's truth remains.
Anonymous
No.164388
2266546__safe_artist-colon-thebatfang_princesscelestia_alicorn_pony_bed_bedroom_bedroomeyes_blanket_cute_cutelestia_earfluff_female_lookingatyou_mare_morni (1).png
>>164387
Based and Celestiapilled.
Anonymous
No.164389
164390
>>164379
Look, even Twilight is arguing that the world is round
Anonymous
No.164390
164391
>>164389
Equestria might be round, perhaps surrounded by the Forever Ice Ring, but the fact is that Equestria is fixed and unmovable while the sun and the moon make turns around it.
Anonymous
No.164391
164392
>>164390
too easy
Since you're here, I trust you're gonna get on that backlog of reasons the earth is sphereoid? You know, in between trying to use a girls cartoon to try and validate your laughably ignorant stance?
Anonymous
No.164392
164393
>>164391
>I trust you're gonna get on that backlog of reasons the earth is sphereoid?
>projection
The backlog is a deluge of proofs that Earth is a plane.
Anonymous
No.164393
>>164392
>T. laughably ignorant flatty
Anonymous
No.164394
164395 164403
>>164386
Can I get an actual answer to this one?
I keep hearing this idea that the earth bring round is supposed to make people less religious or something, but when I ask how I never get an answer.
Anonymous
No.164395
164396 164397
>>164394
His position is that there are vague and/or loosely interpreted statements in the bible that to a flat earther is 'proof' of a flat earth, which is then asserted to be God's design, which then infers that to see the world as NOT flat goes against God.
Anonymous
No.164396
>>164395
>His position is that there are vague and/or loosely interpreted statements in the bible that to a flat earther is 'proof' of a flat earth,
That is not true. This bread is totally filled with non biblical proof.
Anonymous
No.164397
164398
>>164395
Preferably from the person with that position.
Anonymous
No.164398
164399
>>164397
Good luck getting an intellectually honest answer
Anonymous
No.164399
164400
>>164398
Sure, I don't really need to be reminded. Hearing it from someone else isn't helpful though.
Anonymous
No.164400
164401 164402
>>164399
More helpful than anything you're likely to get from OP
Im giving him the cance to - for once ITT - prove me wrong
Anonymous
No.164401
>>164400
>More helpful
Not really...
Anonymous
No.164402
164403
e9902.jpg
>>164400
>Im giving him the cance to - for once ITT - prove me wrong
After more than a thousand posts proving that Earth is a plane and still can't connect the dots.
Anonymous
No.164403
164404 164405
>>164402
Can you answer my questions?
>>164369
>>164394
Anonymous
No.164404
164406
twilight - smug upside down.jpg
>>164403
Anonymous
No.164405
>>164403
I warned you,....
Anonymous
No.164406
164545
1649903193337.png
>>164404
Yes?
Anonymous
No.164408
164409
https://youtu.be/Rx2G6jyxMKo
Its friday again!
Anonymous
No.164409
164411
ClnFZzzWAAAgIi9.jpg
EEu31BzWwAA8Ecv.jpg
FOUmRCqXEAcYMvP.jpg
a50f99e8aac7d47370e3feec30f2d3a1.jpg
c97ac78ab7143dab6225f3a8ef4c0a89.jpeg
>>164408
>Its friday again!
YAY!
Let me drop some redpills before I leave.
Anonymous
No.164410
file-20211104-27-1tvy0hf.jpg
>1st photo of earth, taken in the 1970s from space, back when computers operated from punch cards and didnt have image rendering capability, let alone editing
But of course, "space isnt real", it is claimed
Anonymous
No.164411
164414 164415
>>164409
>we don't feel a thing
We don't feel anything because we, our bodies, and the world around is is moving at the same rate.
It's like how you don't feel motion when an airplane is cruising at consistent. You only feel it when it changes course.
Anonymous
No.164414
3VKHXyF.jpeg
>>164411
Anonymous
No.164415
164418 164434 164461
135.png
>>164411
>world around is is moving at the same rate.
If the orbit of the fictional ball is elliptic then we should totally feel the motion.
See >>150031
Anonymous
No.164416
dFHu90O4FXY.jpg
>Flat Earth, Common Sense & Beauty Put Together!
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/flat-earth,-common-sense-beauty-put:0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IdJ5eeKkNclZ/
A compilation of this cunt's redpills
Anonymous
No.164417
flat earth society.png
>Flat Earth Society
>controlled opposition
In plain sight.
Anonymous
No.164418
164434
>>164415
>I can totally feel it when a car accelerates from 50mph to 50.05mph over the course of several hours
Thats effectively what you're claiming in ignorance.
Anonymous
No.164423
Water boils at different temperatures, the further from sea level one travels.
The globe model asserts that this is due to a decreasing atmospheric pressure, the higher one's altitude.
How does a Flat Earth explain this phenomenon?
Anonymous
No.164434
164456
>>164415
>>164418
>>150031
You feel when a plane or car changes course because your own body has it's own momentum that tries to stay it's own course

The Earth being in an orbit isn't changing any momentum, the momentum is in a non-circular orbit, you have the same momentum as the Earth so you feel nothing

This isn't hard
Anonymous
No.164456
164459
>>164434
So what you're saying is, claims that one 'would feel a/the change' are spurious and invalid?
Anonymous
No.164459
164460
>>164456
You'd feel it if it actually changed, like if the earth suddenly veered off it's orbit due to impact with a similarly-sized object.
The earth has been spinning/revolving the same way it has been for millions of years, along with everything on the surface of the earth, so nobody feels it.
Anonymous
No.164460
>>164459
But but... Owen Benjamin said...
Anonymous
No.164461
>>150031
>>164415
>why don't we feel it?
This question was answered centuries ago.
Anonymous
No.164465
164470
>>164354
Take tide elevation into account, the elevation of the boat and camera, and the fact that the earth isn't a perfect sphere.
Anonymous
No.164466
>>164385
>>164386
So, what is it supposed to mean?
Anonymous
No.164470
>>164465
Or the fact that the model (perspective aside) depicts a right triangle from which simple pythagorus will show that the model is uselessly imprecise and capable of producing values in the four figure percentage range of error
Anonymous
No.164471
main-qimg-c16d5c0a07fe15cdb5605940b8e8bb1d.gif
>>164354
Not hard, you're just fudging numbers
Anonymous
No.164529
164530 164531
https://youtu.be/rjYc8h3xt-E
Anonymous
No.164530
164531 164536
>>164529
>Ex-Flat Earther
Once redpilled there is no turning back.
Anonymous
No.164531
164536
>>164529
Feels like 2014 youtube. I don't want to go back

>>164530
I don't think he was ever redpilled. It's been almost 10 minutes and he just keeps talking about how people are looneys for not trusting the media
Anonymous
No.164536
>>164531
The takeaway is that according to the ex flat earth youtuber, flat earth youtubers are not 'true' flat earthers because they (Bob in particular, but with call-outs to DITRH and others) make regular-interval attempts to 'prove' that the earth is flat (and universally fail) whereas a 'true' flat earther wouldnt even entertain the notion, conduct a test, etc because they are too busy 'knowing with absolute conviction' that the 'earth is flat'. This is an important distinction because, in a startling twist of events the 'no true scotsman' fallacy is NOT a fallacy when dealing with flatties.
What this means is, whatever the individual's cause (mental/psychological/developmental/learning/etc disability), there is an absolute refusal/inability to accept or acknowledge ANY evidence excepting what is assumed to support the premise, as has been thoroughly illustrated by/through this thread. Note how OP doesnt indicate specifically how claims "prove" a flat earth, he instead points at the "mountain of evidence"; he doesnt understand the material - even that which purports to indicate a flat earth - sufficient to argue the point and instead relies on his conviction to the idea and assumes that it should be aufficient to bring the viewer to a/the realization 'he had'.
Its authoritarianism 101 when broken down this way, but it is nice to hear it from an "ex flat earther", which doesn't exist according to OP and he's actually right because a "true" flat earther maintains their willful ignorance and would be unwilling to admit to it.
>>164530
Case in point, and thank you for reaffirming the point.
Anonymous
No.164543
Let's take OP's favorite ideologue - Eric Dubay - to further illustrate this phenomenon. It's only 5.5min (unless you tire of his droning, monotinous, 'totally not neuro-linguistic programming, why would you suggest that?' oration and speed it up).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mkrgeqFDQVpq/
As (you) watch this video, you'll want to set aside your critical capacity; the point is not to determine the (in)validity of his premise, instead the intent should be to experience the awe/impression that this video has on flat earthers (keep the brain-bleach close tho). His conviction, the simplicity of his ideas, it's impressive, right? He must be right, it's so simple, isnt it?
A true flatty will experience all of these phenomena, except that some element of the formula eliminates the possibility that legitimate refutation can be viewed as valid. The authoritarianism is sufficient that the POSSIBILITY of refutation has been (to the flatty) PROVEN to not exist.
I have addressed why this video (and OP) is lunacy from my basic recollection of astronomy, aided by citations from google. Its that simple. But my refutations - and the following more comprehensive ones - have (again, to the flatty) are defacto invalid, because they refute "what is true", a 'flat earth'.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mkrgeqFDQVpq/
And of course, he comes pre-loaded with observably false and/or spurious excuses why the facts issued are irrelevant/invalid; shill, NASA, Freemason, etc.
Whether individuals are any of the above or not doesnt diminish the content of their argument, alluding to the extreme predisposition/conviction I refer to. Also, dont ask OP to cite any of these NASA/Mason shills, as once again his belief is sufficient to dismiss both the person entirely and anything they might say (unless they happen to say something that could loosely be interpreted as relating to a flat earth, in which case it will be proclaimed as "NASA/mason shill slips and proves flat earth").
Anonymous
No.164544
164559
My bad, the second link should be this one:
https://youtu.be/33AMn8OD81s
Anonymous
No.164545
Spoilered
>>164406
Here's an unironic flatty summarizing the God/Bible/Flat Earth 'significance'. There are other examples, I HIGHLY recommend the Dubay comment section
Anonymous
No.164559
164570 164589
>>164544
Sci-Fi Dan pretends to debuk Dubay with mimics and derision, but Dubay's logic is flawless. The heliocentric model doesn't hold water.
Anonymous
No.164570
>>164559
>Bidet's logic is flawless
Thank you for your testimony, Ms. Heard
Anonymous
No.164571
164572 164584
>>163405
Hey, remember when you ignored this one cuz its irrefutable?
Anonymous
No.164572
164584 165781
IMG_20220703_193115.jpg
IMG_20220703_193203.jpg
IMG_20220703_193243.jpg
>>164571
Heres some stills, with the timeframe semi indicated
Anonymous
No.164584
164586 164588 164590
>>164571
>>164572
>you ignored this one cuz its irrefutable
Nope. That post is ignored because you won't do any research faggot. What you are showing has been debunked over and over again in this bread.
Look for the keyword "perspective".
Anonymous
No.164585
164587 164591
china.jpeg
>China may be plotting moon takeover – NASA
>Chinese astronauts are busy learning how to destroy other nations’ satellites, agency chief Bill Nelson claimed
https://www.rt.com/russia/558264-space-china-us-nasa/
Reminder that the ball hoax conspiracy is not restricted to the anglo sector.
Anonymous
No.164586
>>164584
So, your "refutation" of a video of a ship disappearing over the planet's curvature is to claim without citation that it's been debunked?
And you think "do a keyword search" passes as an argument?
I know you'll never admit the truth, it's been thoroughly documented and illustrated, as well as why.
But come on dude. For the sake of those around you.
You may not like it, you may absolutely refuse to acknowledge it, you can throw out all the classic diversions and FB memes, but the reality is THAT is the curve.
You have seen the curve. Good luck spending your life trying to hide from the fact.
Anonymous
No.164587
>>164585
This just makes you look even more retarded, redditor.
Anonymous
No.164588
>>164584
>ignored because you won't do any research
What would you say if the research led him to a different conclusion?
Anonymous
No.164589
>>164559
>Dubay's logic is flawless
Elaborate.
Anonymous
No.164590
>>164584
>over and over
>Look for the keyword "perspective".
Only 3 instances of that word appear in this thread, only one of which is remotely related to the ships disappearing below the horizon.
And when another user asked the poster to elaborate, they received no reply.
Anonymous
No.164591
>>164585
>Reminder that the ball hoax conspiracy is not restricted to the anglo sector.
>Implying Chinese weapons systems are just fireworks to make western scientists look good, and not attempts to develop long-range, hypersonic, intercontinental weapons to stay competent in the changing military environment
That's a very strong accusation. Do you have any evidence to back that up?
Anonymous
No.164597
SPOILER_unknown.png

Anonymous
No.164600
questioning science is how you do science.png

Anonymous
No.164606
164607
maxresdefault.jpg
>Is there an ice wall surrounding Antarctica? -- GLOBEHOAX - (8:10 long)
>Premiered Feb 16, 2021
>This video shows some great HD capture of the Antarctic ice wall!
>Included some short clips of Jarle Andhøy (The "Illegal" Antarctic Explorer)
>There will be a longer and more complete video of Jarle Andhøy later this year!
https://odysee.com/@ChadPrestonOfficial:9/is-there-an-ice-wall-surrounding:8
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch9POQ-Mu_M
Anonymous
No.164607
164612
249533248-rarity_implied_facepalm.png
>>164606
Huh. One wonders how they got to Antarctica if govt agencies are viciously attacking everyone who goes there. Unless,....
One also wonders what they expected to find OTHER than an ice shelf.
One ESPECIALLY wonders how they can credibly claim that because they landed on the edge of Antarctica that somehow magically means that the entire ice wall theory is somehow evidenced and validated.
I mean, again, what were they expecting to find? If their criteria of evidence for 'proving/showing' the 'ice wall' was to find ice... in Antarctica,....
I mean, by that thinking, are active volcanoes evidence of Tartarus/Hell/etc?
Anonymous
No.164612
>>164607
>I mean, again, what were they expecting to find?
Putting a foot on Antarctica is the first step for larger expeditions. The lack of active defense measures to neutralize zog forces still is an issue sadly.
Anonymous
No.164708
164710 164712 164713
File (hide): 1202925A2BAAFE5728890F36817A71FC-2535541.mp4 (2.4 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:43, two sunsets.mp4) [play once] [loop]
two sunsets.mp4
I wish some ball believer could explain this.
Anonymous
No.164710
>>164708
Cuz you've done so well with all the previous explanations?
Anonymous
No.164712
164713
>>164708
Likely rift caused by different air temperatures colliding.
You can see it in rivers and oceans too.
Anonymous
No.164713
164715
>>164712
>>164708
That being said, I'm not quite sure how that relevant to the flat vs round argument? Do you mean to say that this sorts of atmospheric phenomena implies that the world is flat? If so, please explain why.
Anonymous
No.164715
164716
>>164713
>Do you mean to say that this sorts of atmospheric phenomena implies that the world is flat?
Nope, but considering that globers have unlimited imagination to speculate on an explanation, I think was worth of a shot.
Anonymous
No.164716
164721
>>164715
Well, I'm not meteorologist, but I gave you what I think it is. I'd probably say the same thing if the world were flat or round.
Different air temperatures have different density and humidity, so they appear different from earth. This looks like it was in Colorado(?), so it's possibly a shelf of fridgid mountain air colliding with sea level air.
Anonymous
No.164721
>>164716
Yes, but you're missing the subtext.
The phenomenon you describe is one resulting from atmospheric conditions.
Atmospheric conditions are a result of gravity and atmosphere.
According to OP/flatties, gravity and space (atmoshere) doesnt exist.
So no, your description - speculative that it is - manages to refute flat earth
Anonymous
No.164730
round earther npc.jpeg

Anonymous
No.164731
>epic-facebook-maymay.pwn
Anonymous
No.164749
164752
sats.png
>The Satellite Hoax - (6 minutes long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/old-taboo-the-satellite-hoax:5
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFNVEyH9lpQ
Anonymous
No.164751
164752
grav.png
>The Farce of Gravity - A Closer Look at Cavendish's Balls - (3 minutes long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/old-taboo-the-farce-of-gravity-a-closer:0
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWJ5UcoqBN0
Anonymous
No.164752
164753
>>164749
>I know, Ill wrap my lack of comprehension into a SONG! That'll distract people from the Dunning-Kreuger!
Balloon satellites? Again? Is it that difficult to grasp that gasses are vastly less expensive than rockets, more efficient, less catastrophic when they come down, etc?
>>164751
Okay, now Im just confused. What does an eclipse - an optical effect - have to do with he force of gravity?
I mean, I can conceive of someone suggesting that he moon's gravity would stack with he sun's gravity, but thats retarded. If you dont know why, you're retarded, and are probably posting vids like this on a flat earth thread somewhere.
Anonymous
No.164753
164757
>>164752
>I mean, I can conceive of someone suggesting that he moon's gravity would stack with he sun's gravity, but thats retarded.
I agree, the establishment propped Cavendish experiment is retarded and a scientific fraud.
Anonymous
No.164757
164758
>>164753
Who's talking about Cavendish? Did he propose that you can jump higher during an eclipse? No, that was definitely (you)
Anonymous
No.164758
164759
>>164757
>Did he propose that you can jump higher during an eclipse?
Ahem.
Or you understand the Gravity Theory, that by the way globers believe, or you don't.
Anonymous
No.164759
164760
>>164758
Are you agreeing that a person CAN jump measurably higher during an eclipse?
Cuz gravity doesnt support that premise.
And if you think it DOES,... well, you're probably a flat earther
Anonymous
No.164760
164761
tumblr_d8174d493864806bf4785d5c12e1536a_3f4ce235_500.png
>>164759
Anonymous
No.164761
164762
>>164760
Not that you can be taken seriously, but Im legit not sure what you're arguing here. Are you legit thinking that 'if the earth "was" round, you could jump higher during an eclipse', or am I misinterpreting?
Anonymous
No.164762
164763
>>164761
>Are you legit thinking that 'if the earth "was" round, you could jump higher during an eclipse'
Yup.
The supposedly gravitational forces pulling the tides apply also during an eclipse.
Anonymous
No.164763
164764
>>164762
Thank you for clarifying. I wont tell you why that's retarded, you probably wouldnt listen anyway. But, I do appreciate the clarification.
Anonymous
No.164764
164765
newtons.png
>>164763
>I wont tell you why that's retarded, you probably wouldnt listen anyway.
Better try to deny the math, ball zealot.
Anonymous
No.164765
164766
>>164764
Uhm, the answer is as simple as the "golly, why doesnt the water stick to this tennis ball if gravity" 'argument' that flat earthers try to use to debunk gravity.
So you unironically think that "if gravity and tides, then I can jump higher cuz the moon"?
You further think that the position of the sun and moon can increase or decrease the gravitational forces that a person experiences, such that one 'could' jump higher? Or rather, your understanding of gravity is such that u assume that gravoty supports that position, where if the sun and moon are aligned, the gravitational forces somehow synergize?
Anonymous
No.164766
164767 164786
isaac-newtons-freemasonry-9781594771729_hr.jpg
>>164765
>You further think that the position of the sun and moon can increase or decrease the gravitational forces that a person experiences, such that one 'could' jump higher?
It should be exactly like that according to Sir issac Newton. But, apparently you have no clue because you just repeat what the freemason school told you.
Anonymous
No.164767
164768
>>164766
Those pesky freemasons, with their cohesive and basic maths, always tryin'a keep a flat earther 'down' amirite? Niggas be thinking that there be a center of gravity n sheit.
Except, gravitational forces don't stack. Its that basic.
Anonymous
No.164768
164770
mocking.gif
>>164767
Just accept defeat.
Anonymous
No.164769
164772 164773
To be more clear, (you) assume that 2 forces in alignment should combine. In context, you assume that two aligned gravotational forces cause a synergistic effect, whereby the total gravotational force is increased by the sum of 2 parts.
This is an easy trap to fall into, and I dont fault you for it.
But it's wrong.
Gravity doent work like that. The earth is NEVER outside f the sun's gravitational effect. Yes the tides prouce a small effect, but that effect would perist beyond eclipses. A more 'true' refutation would be to assert that JUST the moon/tides produce this effect. So then, why can't one jump higher during 'high tide'?
The answer?
They CAN.
The problem is its an unmeasurable variance, to miniscule (and contextual) to quantify.
So in summary:
>Why desnt the moon make me jump higher?
It does, infinitesimally.
Anonymous
No.164770
>>164768
Oh? Like you did when I showed a ship disappearing over the 'nonexistent' curvature?
Anonymous
No.164772
164773
>>164769
*Too miniscule
Anonymous
No.164773
164774 164775 164777 164802 164803
newtons.png
conversion.png
>>164769
>It does, infinitesimally.
>>164772
>*Too miniscule
That force is not infinitesimal or minuscule faggots. 42 grams is an important and easily measurable magnitude.
Anonymous
No.164774
pounds.png
>>164773
In case you are scratching your head with metric units, here in imperial units:
Anonymous
No.164775
>>164773
Oh? Please display how .1lbs is not an infinitesimal amount when testing vertical leap.
Anonymous
No.164776
>be 200 pound man
>jump expecting to notice you're only 199.9998 pounds today
>land, feeling normal
Pee pee poo poo the earth is round and so are you
Anonymous
No.164777
164789 164795 164820 164825
53993b9645e3d1c9751a04088b1a5e66.webp.png
7c9f02179b75eb72f019e54196402cf6.webp.png
355caff8817f603065fea17fc1e50dc2.webp.png
>>164773
That number's bull because it's mostly the force of the sun, which is largely even. So, only a tiny fraction of that number actually changes, so obviously you don't feel a change

The moon has an effect on the ocean but not people because the ocean is much heavier than people are, and the ocean as a liquid has a larger potential to change it's shape

But the sun's effect is felt in tides too, even though it's much weaker than the moon's. When they align it's called a spring tide and when they cancel out it's called a neap tide. This is something people have known about for thousands of years and you can go out and see it yourself.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/springtide.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tide#Spring

I genuinely dare you to actually reply this time
Anonymous
No.164785
164798
Huh, look what thread isnt getting bumped.
It couldnt be cuz OP knows hes fcked and is hiding
Answer the question
Anonymous
No.164786
>>164766
That's ad hominem. Get a real argument.
Anonymous
No.164789
>>164777
>I genuinely dare you to actually reply this time
Later, busy now.
Anonymous
No.164792
164793 164799
File (hide): 5FEFDEDD02DD0B94FEC78E684DC67856-6336983.mp4 (6.0 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:02, James Webb Telescope.mp4) [play once] [loop]
James Webb Telescope.mp4
>James Webb Telescope
Let us check the last Photoshop collage out, brought to us by the freemasons.
Anonymous
No.164793
164794
>>164792
>Somewhere in the vast reaches of space, theres a flt earther who thinks that THIS is a coherent argument
Anonymous
No.164794
164795 164801
>>164793
>Somewhere on the vast plains under the dome, there's a gullible glober who thinks an out control bureaucracy won't lie to him.
Anonymous
No.164795
164796
>>164794
Theres that intellectual honesty you lot are known for. Before you get too carried away, at least TRY to focus
>>164777
Anonymous
No.164796
164841
busy.png
>>164795
Later, busy now.
Anonymous
No.164798
>>164785
Some of us prefer to sage this thread.
Anonymous
No.164799
164800
>>164792
This guy doesn't even try to prove that the pictures are fake.
He could've at least analyzed the images for noise patterns, ffs.
Anonymous
No.164800
>>164799
*this video doesn't
Anonymous
No.164801
>>164794
What evidence do you have that the photos are fake?
Anonymous
No.164802
>>164773
>42 grams is an important and easily measurable magnitude.
Your normal weight fluctuates by 2-6 pounds every day from minute differences in water weight and, and you still feel the same. How could you feel a difference of less than one tenth of a pound when your body weight already fluctuates more than that every day without feeling different?
Anonymous
No.164803
>>164773
>42 grams
To put 42 grams in perspective, the average weight of a pair of socks is 60-120 grams.

Put on a pair of socks, and then jump in the air 20 consecutive times.

Now take off those socks and do the same thing.

Note the difference in height achieved, and then take into account that 42 grams is LESS THAN THAT.
Anonymous
No.164804
Actually, socks could create a difference of friction.
Put 4 quarters in both pockets (44.8 grams in total) and report the results with a sample size of 30 jumps. Be sure to perform the trials 15-20 minutes apart to account for the possibility of getting tired and needing a breather.
Anonymous
No.164805
Or try doing it before and after drinking 1/5th of a cup of water.
See if you can feel the difference.
Anonymous
No.164808
164809
1105915.png
He's still busy
Anonymous
No.164809
7510.png
>>164808
Anonymous
No.164810
164811 164815
back again to bully OP

If, like Dubay says, if Earth were spinning we'd all fall off, why doesn't every passenger in a plane cram to the back when they're being shot forward at 500 miles per hour? I know the answer, do you?
Anonymous
No.164811
164812
>>164810
It's because of Jesus, right?
Anonymous
No.164812
>>164811
its Masonic wizardry bro
Anonymous
No.164815
164821 164824
smug aryanne.png
>>164810
>back again to bully OP
Really?
Anonymous
No.164816
164819 164820
The Healthy American - Peggy Hall gets it_EDIT.mp4
The redpilling is getting closer to critical mass by the day. A clip from:

>FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS AIR FORCE VAX REQUIREMENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtNZrvkbceA&t=515s
Anonymous
No.164819
>>164816
>Look! I found a dumb bitch! Checkmate globeys!
While we're citing dumb bitches, mine has an argument
https://youtube.com/shorts/QsvwswQl6Vo?feature=share
>Why flat earthers believe that shit
https://youtube.com/shorts/0ZDShOguxz0?feature=share
How long has it been known that the earth is round
Anonymous
No.164820
164825
>>164816
Also, this is OP totally not blatantly ignoring so many of the well constructed arguments ITT. Yes, I know the rule, I'm just making sure anon sees how absurd OP is.
Meanwhile, >>164777 is still waiting
Anonymous
No.164821
>>164815
Answer the earlier questions.
Anonymous
No.164824
>>164815
you gonna answer any of the questions you were asked?
Anonymous
No.164825
2662672.png
2662671.png
>>164820
Still waiting on multiple posts
>>163482 >>163311 >>162824 >>162790 >>164777

OP sure likes to spew shit without following it up
Anonymous
No.164826
164827 164835
16469397719270.png
Are there any other reasons the international community/jews would spend so much money on fake researches and bribes to cover up the flat earth nature other than hiding god or aliens?
Anonymous
No.164827
164828 164829
>>164826
They don't want you to go to Antarctica because of the hyperborean ruins
Anonymous
No.164828
>>164827
There was more than enough time for them to dig them all up and grind everything into dust, why would they keep them?
Anonymous
No.164829
164830
>>164827
Hyperborean is the north pole.
Anonymous
No.164830
164831 164832
>>164829
thats what (((they))) want you to think but there's no land at the north pole
Anonymous
No.164831
164833 164834
Rarity_thinking_S4E13.jpeg
>>164830
Does anybody went to the north pole? Is anybody even allowed to go there?
Anonymous
No.164832
>>164830
Literally all of the mythology of hyperborea is centered around the direction "north".
Anonymous
No.164833
>>164831
People cross the pole of the time. The main reason why they don't do it often is because it's dangerous and not always necessary.
Also, international law is laughably impotent, especially when it comes to restricting access to areas. They can't even stop Japs from hunting whales to extinction.
The Arctic circle is expected to become contested between the US and Russia in the near future, since recent ice melts have eased travel and unearthed precious mineral deposits.
Anonymous
No.164834
164836
>>164831
the Arctic is a lot more accessible than Antarctica, companies will even take you on a tour there for "request a quote" levels of money and the Russians have sailed a nuclear icebreaker all the way there and back
Anonymous
No.164835
164837 164845
34d9e7f62e608e2e0683c076fc81153a0254d2fb7d10cb5af064082ee88951ad_1.jpg
>>164826
>international community
It's really just absurd that people imply that the "international community", many of which are sworn enemies of eachother, could have or would have coordinated a massive intercontinental conspiracy to keep the shape of the earth flat, when they've fallen flat on enforcing virtually any other kind of international law.
We've had two world wars, and a cold war thereafter where countries were fighting tooth and nail for influence. Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
>inb4 Jews
Jews can't even get half of Muslims to stop hating them on a national level. They are not all powerful when it comes to international media influence, especially not in non-western countries.
Anonymous
No.164836
>>164834
correction: the Russians have sailed at least two nuclear ice breakers to 90 degrees north
Anonymous
No.164837
164838
>>164835
I brought something like this up earlier in the thread, some guy actively evading both sides in WWII sailed all the way around the world below the capes and OP in his infinite wisdom said he was a globalist masonic shill
see: Vito Dumas
Anonymous
No.164838
164839 164849
>>164837
Wait, did he imply that Hitler was working for Jews to keep the flat earth a secret...?
Anonymous
No.164839
164840
>>164838
why do you think he didn't genocide any of them anon?
Anonymous
No.164840
unknown_54_13.png
>>164839
Anonymous
No.164841
164842
>>164796
>still busy somehow
Anonymous
No.164842
164843 164844
>>164841
he's laying low until we all forget that he's got questions to answer, don't let him forget.
Anonymous
No.164843
164844
>>164842
There's only like 25 active posters to this site. He can't possibly think we'd all forget.
Anonymous
No.164844
164845 164850
>>164842
>>164843
He's not gonna respond, ask me how I know. It's not about convincing him, it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.
Anonymous
No.164845
164846 164847 164852 164881
>>164835
Yeah, while I'm not saying that the earth is flat, I do want to point out that there's nothing absurd about conspiracies across the world.
The cold war was an illusion and if muslims were a threat they'd stop them from entering countries were they live but they don't. Jews aren't afraid of muslims.
>Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
Because they aren't nationalist, why would they care what happens to their country?
>>164844
Honestly, I wouldn't respond either. It's a waste of time speaking to people who clearly don't listen to you. The idea of wining debates to further one's ideology's position is a monkey on your back. There's no winning from there. On that note, he has been active in defending his position earlier in thread.
Regardless, winning a debate is not proof that one's position is the correct one.
Anonymous
No.164846
>>164845
>people who clearly don't listen to yo
Like, you do in fact do not believe ijn this, right? I'm not trying to say you're too arrogant or anything but it's very clear that you strongly disbelieve.
Anonymous
No.164847
164848
>>164845
>Jews aren't afraid of Muslims
>Muslims aren't a threat
these aren't mutually exclusive, my friend. They let them into your country because they're not a threat to Jews specifically, but they are a threat to you when they're in your country, like any ethnic minority that refuses to assimilate into your culture.

you know.... like Jews
Anonymous
No.164848
>>164847
Yeah, true. And I know, that's what meant but it came wrong.
Anonymous
No.164849
164861
>>164838
>Wait, did he imply that Hitler was working for Jews to keep the flat earth a secret...?
WOW, the shilling is intense today.
Everybody knew that Earth is flat at that time. Uncle Adolf included. See >>157419 and >>157473
Anonymous
No.164850
164852 164867
hah.jpg
>>164844
>it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.
OP come with facts, but all you have is character assassination and debunked NASA shills. If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
Anonymous
No.164851
Flat eartherism is still fucking gay
Anonymous
No.164852
164853 164864 164865 164881
>>164845
Ngl, that's a rather cucked position to take. If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
>>164850
Ladies and gentlemen, cognitive dissonance at it's finest.
Anonymous
No.164853
164854
131942468137.png
>>164852
Anonymous
No.164854
>>164853
>le smug pony response image
This is OP, Ladies and gentlemen
Anonymous
No.164855
164856
51BC5EAC-01F9-4493-A6C0-5748A1812B51.png
I don’t believe in Flat Earthers
Anonymous
No.164856
164859
87655994.jpg
>>164855
And yet the famous curve can't be found.
Anonymous
No.164857
164858 164862
e1b6a7366b2ec8bd0c75be58354c0bdc.jpg

Anonymous
No.164858
>>164857
hey OP, scroll back up, you've got a LONG backlog of explanations, faggot.
Anonymous
No.164859
164860
>>164856
It literally has been. You just dismiss anybody who doesn't reaffirm your existing beliefs as a "NASA/Freemason shill".
I'm beginning to suspect that you wouldn't even accept direct empirical evidence seeing the earth from space.

Also, answer all the earlier questions/refutations, you conniving coward.
Anonymous
No.164860
>>164859
"my eyes themselves are freemasonic, jesuit shills" - OP, seconds before blinding himself after his ride to space
Anonymous
No.164861
>>164849
That's a map.
Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, and the proof of that was that he sent an expedition to the north pole to investigate the Hollow Earth theory.
Anonymous
No.164862
164863
>>164857
This is simple. The craft was moving with the earth on its axis, just like anything else that moves straight upwards. It's geostationary.
On an unrelated note Baumgartner is a retard for thinking it was possible somehow to break the sound barrier by falling from great height. Terminal velocity is a thing.
Anonymous
No.164863
>>164862
>he was a retard for thinking he could break the sound barrier by falling
he.... did though?
>reaching an estimated top speed of 1,357.64 km/h (843.6 mph), or Mach 1.25
Anonymous
No.164864
>>164852
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
Oh, come on, Anon. That's never stopped any /pol/ack or other imageboard user before.
Anonymous
No.164865
164866 164868 164881
>>164852
Are you saying there hasn't been a single debate in which the person who was wrong won?
It's a waste of time. In the end it's both for the sake of pride but also for political appeal to others. Both of these don't serve you. Pride gets in the way of intellectual development of ones ideas and influencing others is best done by playing on your homefield, as in books or something. Some sort of focused push than endlessly debating people on the internet.
Anonymous
No.164866
164868 164871
meds.png
>>164865
look man I just like checking in here every few days and curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs, don't look any further into it. I'm here for my entertainment, if the rest of you get a chuckle out of it I win even more
Anonymous
No.164867
>>164850
You repeatedly calling people "NASA shills" without substantial evidence is the definition of character assassination and ad hominem.
>If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
Said the pot to the kettle.
Anonymous
No.164868
164870
>>164865
>It's a waste of time.
This, tbh. It's not exactly the most productive or interesting use of energy.
>>164866
The beliefs really don't need to be curbstomped. You've already made your point to all 4-5 guys who even bother to read this thread, and OP certainly isn't changing his mind.
Couldn't you find something more substantial to argue about? That argument energy would be better invested making politics threads, or arguing about which mare is cutest.
Anonymous
No.164869
3308.png
Outstanding, the shilling is off the chart today.
Anonymous
No.164870
164874
>>164868
if you think this is the only place I'm shitposting you're very wrong
Anonymous
No.164871
164872
2840.png
>>164866
>curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs
Facts are facts. This realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.164872
164873
>>164871
why does the land float on the ocean if gravity isn't real and density determines where things go on the planet? (both claims of your Mr. Dubay)
Anonymous
No.164873
>>164872
by the way, my friend, you CAN experimentally prove this one yourself, go outside (hard, I know)
find a rock
drop it in water
Anonymous
No.164874
164875
>>164870
I didn't say that. I said you're just wasting your time in this particular thread. It would be better spent elsewhere.
Anonymous
No.164875
>>164874
I don't understand why people think it takes some massive time and effort to bang out 3 sentences or less dunking on a retard. I have a triple digit IQ, this isn't some massive use of my time. Most of the time I do it between work tasks or lift sets
Anonymous
No.164876
164878
6ee2291c20f79622afd8c3a53fcf3936.jpg
Not sure who is trolling and baiting who.
Anonymous
No.164877
>>163383
If we're gonna go on about assertions unresponded to, I'd like for OP to respond to NASAs assertion that its a pone
Anonymous
No.164878
hehehe.png
>>164876
Anonymous
No.164881
164882 164889
uberthot.jpg
>>164845
>>164865
This.
Essentially how I go about things.
>>164852
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition
The question is not whether they withstand opposition or not. But rather, how much importance you want to grant to some random aspie. It's just like Jordan Peterstein said:

<"You don't have to put up with children's bullshit"
You can just opt out and say: "Well, feel free to make the last post ITT, you fucking manchild..."
Anonymous
No.164882
164883 164906
nothing ever goes to space.jpg
>>164881
>You can just opt out and say: "Well, feel free to make the last post ITT, you fucking manchild..."
This.
A baller gang came to shit this bread and they are getting frustrated and making a fuzz because OP won't take them seriously.
Anonymous
No.164883
164884 164906
>>164882
you know, this is observably, demonstrably false. I grew up in Florida and once or twice a year my old man would take me up to watch shuttle launches. They went up but they sure didn't come down for a few days.
Anonymous
No.164884
164885 164886
>>164883
>you know, this is observably, demonstrably false
I guess your old man took you with him in day time. The photograph is a night time capture with a very long exposure to capture the rocket's real trajectory.
Anonymous
No.164885
a2089f6606a835b1020eea8995b9685c.jpg
>>164884
>very long exposure
Perhaps ISO 3200.
Anonymous
No.164886
164887 164888
>>164884
actually I'm going to say with almost certainty that I was there for STS-84's launch, the time of year feels right and I remember we had to get up REALLY early to go catch it

Launched: May 15, 1997 4:07:48 a.m. EDT
Landing Site: Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Landing: May 24, 1997, 9:27:44 a.m. EDT
Anonymous
No.164887
164888
>>164886
and to answer your next cope:
6:32 AM
Thursday, May 15, 1997 (EDT)
Sunrise in Daytona Beach, FL
Anonymous
No.164888
164899 164906
rfv.png
>>164886
>>164887
Checking your NASA charts?
Anonymous
No.164889
164891 164895
>>164881
Would that it were so simple.
Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you, but the flat earth psyop is as subversive to objective reality as the transgender craze, just targeting a different demographic.
Anonymous
No.164891
164892 164901
gr.png
>>164889
>sheer dishonesty
Flat Earth is based on demonstrable and reproducible experiments, not to mention wide inconsistencies in the heliocentric model.
Transgender craze is based on political correctness which by definition is deliberated distortion of language, when not suppression of inconvenient facts.
Anonymous
No.164892
164893 164896
>>164891
Splitting hairs, they both involve a denial of objective reality with spurious ideas brought about by ignorant and stupid people
https://youtu.be/ww47bR86wSc
Anonymous
No.164893
164894
Screenshot_2.png
>>164892
Ahem, even if the video at first glance looks sound, jew propaganda is not welcome.
Anonymous
No.164894
>>164893
>literal ad hominem
Anonymous
No.164895
File (hide): FD0BD6CCCAC19C306D3EA4455818594E-10939846.mp4 (10.4 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:15, simplescreenrecorder-2022-02-03_20.08.31.mp4) [play once] [loop]
simplescreenrecorder-2022-02-03_20.08.31.mp4
>>164889
I could see this. Making up wacky shit and associating it with your enemies they do all the time

I cringe when it's mentioned by people like Sven or Mike, even though they're usually good. I've also seen a few sites make articles about Nazi flat-earthers
Anonymous
No.164896
164904
What yo sayin neighua.png
>>164892
Literal jewTube propaganda, what are you doing?

The stupid people are the one's that watch propaganda for entertainment or think it's a good thing to post

Like I get videos can make good points (though they're not a replacement for you saying something yourself), but these kinds of videos are tailor-made propaganda, even has the whole literal atrocity propaganda at the start

The whole thing is masturbating redditor types because they watch it and go
>"haha, yes, those dummy dumbos are so dumb, good thing I am better than them and believe mr youtube man, haha, I'm smart"

None of it makes sense, it's just presented as if it does and implies, obviously, that if you don't follow it you are one of the dumbos
>You can fight against malice but not idiocy because you can use violence against malicious people
Like this. What is it supposed to mean? It's stated like it's profound but you can obviously punch a dumb person exactly as much as an evil person, every sentence in these is some kind of "if you kill your enemies, they win" stupid bullshit that's just meant to sound like it makes sense

I dare you to take a sentence out of that video that makes a concrete and useful point that you can actually back up. What's the point of the video? What is the point you're trying to make? Why post it? Stupid people are stupid and bad and don't think right? Why do you need to make this point? Why do you feel as if you can't make it yourself?
Anonymous
No.164897
164898
What's /Flat Earth General/'s Opinion on The Holocaust?
Anonymous
No.164898
164900
a6094a2a473b8b57.png
unknown-66.png
Gassed by Law.mp3
cb4d8c22f9bc2403.jpg
5031d24d316d6fea.png
>>164897
Anonymous
No.164899
>>164888
yes, I googled scheduled STS launches because I was a child at the time. I'm sorry, is my objective, personal experience not good enough for you retard? KSFS launches are public for the most part, go watch one if you can scrape together enough allowance for a bus ticket to Florida
Anonymous
No.164900
_JA .jpg
>>164898
Based
Anonymous
No.164901
164905
she_stare.png
>>164891
>wide inconsistencies
Dozens of inconsistencies have been pointed out with the flat-earth model as well, many of which you've refused to reply to in this thread. I can't even count all the times the things you've asserted have been either refuted logically, or directly contradicted with more substantial evidence. Most of the time you just scroll past them and pretend they don't exist, because they obviously pointed out gaping inconsistencies in what you just said.
>>164891
>based on demonstrable and reproducible experiments
Even more have been done confirming that the earth is flat, but you've dismissed every single one of them as "NASA shills" without actually disputing their studies for their material.
You've set an impossible standard for any scientist or witness that could have refuted your worldview through ad hominem alone, because apparently everyone who proves you wrong is a "NASA/Freemason shill", even when they have no apparent connection to either organization. You claim that actors like NASA have absurd amounts of far-reaching influence on every continent, without any evidence to support it, let alone why or how; if you asked any other /pol/ack how or why the Jews control the global media and politics, you'd get a mountain of evidence in minutes, but you keep dodging those same questions about NASA. You lump all of them together as part of some grand conspiracy that has supposedly gotten all those separate parties to agree with seamless efficiency. You refuse to answer to anyone who makes an evidence-backed argument as a "shill" (ad hominem), without even trying to refute their arguments. You claim, without evidence, that any video or photograph that challenges your worldview is "photoshopped" without providing evidence or even trying to pursue evidence (such as checking noise patterns).
Not only that, preemptively excluding anyone who might have a connection to aerospace, geography or astrology organizations (in ALL countries, apparently) effectively excludes all scientists in that field, leaving only sketchy YouTubers as an excuse for a source.

What kind of argument would actually convince you? What kind of scientific source would you even consider acceptable if it proved the earth was round? What's your actual standard of evidence? Who would you accept that kind of evidence from? What kind of evidence would you consider to meet your standards of proof? Do you seriously only accept evidence that reaffirms your worldview?

How is anyone supposed to take you seriously like this? Is this how you intend to convince people that the world is flat?
Anonymous
No.164902
164905
And ffs, why doesn't this thread have IDs? It's impossible to have a consistent argument like this.
Anonymous
No.164904
>>164896
That the theory of idiocy was derived in Nazi Germany in concentration camps has no bearing on the phenomenon, and I postrd it cuz OP is precisely the sort of idiot that is described in the video, since you're so quick on the uptake
Anonymous
No.164905
>>164901
Wanna see him lose his shit?
Not a freemason, but I AM a Senior DeMolay; the youth version of freemasonry.
That oughta give him all the paranoid rope he'll need.
>>164902
Almost like OP didnt want to have a legitimate discussion
Anonymous
No.164906
164907
>>164882
>meme
>no meme or rationale to explain the curving phenomena
To answer the question, the rocket curves *because* the world is round: because the world isn't flat, gravity doesn't pull straight 'down', but towards the center of the earth, which is why a long-range rocket's path is a segment of an ellipse.
And, in a hypothetical circumstance that we lived on a flat 'realm' where 'gravity' represented a single-direction force, the rocket would still curve, because the rocket would travel both horizontally and vertically, but only it's vertical travel would be affected by said one-dimensional gravity: the difference is that for flat earth the rocket would be a sharper parabola, rather than an elliptical segment, and long-range rockets would be less of a pain to aim.
>>164883
I'm a Florida Man too. I don't go that often though. Too much driving, and I'm not fond of crowds.
>>164888
He doesn't need a chart to tell you if it was day or night.
What are you trying to argue here?
Anonymous
No.164907
>>164906
I was one of those "I wanna be an astronaut" kids so when the old man had enough gas to take me up I went, just like Disney
Anonymous
No.164968
165045
NASA CGI fakery.png

Anonymous
No.165045
>>164968
Bruh
Anonymous
No.165088
165089
File (hide): DF5428DEAD7352E03080E0A5D30DF421-18005524.webm (17.2 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:02:25, 1000 year old Flat Earth map.webm) [play once] [loop]
1000 year old Flat Earth map.webm
1000 year old Flat Earth map.
Anonymous
No.165089
165090
>>165088
>shard earth image at the beginning
Now you're talking. Oh wait, nevermind. Nice claims, be even mocer if there was anything to vet, like someone alive in this century, or anything more than unverifiable claims
Anonymous
No.165090
165091 165092
>>165089
>unverifiable claims
Such as like this realm is a ball?
Anonymous
No.165091
165092
>>165090
There are plenty of clues and hard experiments debunking the planet baloney, for example >>149637
Anonymous
No.165092
165093
>>165090
Only if you're willfully ignorant
>>165091
Still thinking that a bunch of guys on a boat cant produce enough error and variance in angle/calculation to produce those results eh?
Anonymous
No.165093
>>165092
>guys on a boat
Incorrect. It is guys on the shore pointing at the distance. According to the paid "honorable and trustworthy scientists", the curvature would make the laser beam impossible to see. But because of the laser can be seen, their lies are busted.
Anonymous
No.165094
165096
Speaking of lasers, remember the time they spent $20k to buy a laser gyroscope to prove there was no actual planetary rotation, and accidentally proved there was rotation? Cuz, ya know, its not flat?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.triplem.com.au/story/flat-earthers-spend-20-000-trying-to-prove-earth-is-flat-accidentally-prove-it-s-round-129953
"What we found is, when we turned on that gyroscope, we found that we were picking up a drift," Knodel explains. "A 15-degree per hour drift.

"Now, obviously we were taken aback by that - 'Wow, that's kind of a problem.'

"We obviously were not willing to accept that, and so we started looking for easy to disprove it was actually registering the motion of the Earth."

You know what they say: If your experiment proves you wrong, just disregard the results!

"We don't want to blow this, you know?" Knodel then says to another Flat Earther. "When you've got $20,000 in this freaking gyro.

"If we dumped what we found right now, it would be bad? It would be bad.

"What I just told you was confidential."

Thanks Bob
Anonymous
No.165096
165097
science, a joke.jpg
>>165094
>You know what they say: If your experiment proves you wrong, just disregard the results!
This is exactly what the "respectable scientists" do all the time. Their experiment fails and they ask for more money to reach the result wanted by the establishment, and if not experiment can match the answer they want, they pull deliriant theories from their asses and promote them as truth. It is fucking preposterous.
Anonymous
No.165097
165098
Screenshot_20220725-034947_Chrome.jpg
>>165096
Oh, noticed this:
No wonder you lot like to use that calculator to 'debunk' the curve; it's wrong
Anonymous
No.165098
165099
>>165097
>it's wrong
>>>/github/
Anonymous
No.165099
165102
>>165098
No idea what you're going for, the earth is NOT a sphere, plain and simple
>hurrr, cuz its flat
Its an oblate sphereoid. The curvature is different depending on where you ARE on the planet. Theres no simplified calculation that can give you accurate results that do not account for first calculating the exact curvature a specific area will show.
>it wouldnt be that significant tho!
Wont know until the correct calculations are done then. Something you fags stll need to work on, correct calculations. But that would get in the way wouldnt it?
See, when a person is convicted to an idea, they tend to strawman the opposition's argument in their haste to try and debunk it. This manifests as a lack of due diligence when attempting to present the opposition's position. Such as using a simplified version of the model and then debunking that simplified (read: inaccurate) model.
>but but, thats what you're doing
No, Im mot trying to debunk your/their model. Im pointing to the untenable elements of the equation, which would give rise to the skewed results one is seeing.
If you can find evidence that dozens of holes CAN'T be poked in, Ill be the first to admit it.
Still waiting tho
Anonymous
No.165100
165101
calc-method.png
As you can see indicated in the previous citation and this one from their sourcepage, no allowance was made for the sphereoid natureof the planet, they are calculating it as though the planet is a theoretical (read: perfect) sphere.
Thats the problem.
Anonymous
No.165101
165103
>>165100
>Thats the problem.
None when the equation is translated to real life measurements. This bread has plenty of info and REPRODUCIBLE experiments (as the Scientific Method demands) to make your shilling improper as best, dishonest at worst.
Anonymous
No.165102
165103
>>165099
>Its an oblate sphereoid.
And how you know?
Anonymous
No.165103
165105
>>165101
You see that R figure on the image? That stands for RADIUS. with a SPHEREOID, the radius is NEVER EQUAL. Therefore, any equation that tries to use them AS equal, is FLAWED. Moving on
>>165102
Because people who can conduct proper experiments and equations have been doing so for millennia. Moron
Anonymous
No.165104
Correction: if you're willing to crunch the numbers and illustrate how the variance is/would-be negligable, that would be a credible counterpoint. Its plausible, given the localized environment of the experiment.
Having said, the radius from the earth's core to the equator is longest, and the radius from the north pole to the core is the shortest.
Anonymous
No.165105
>>165103
I think Eratosthenes was the first to do a real experiment proving that the Earth is round so I think technically only one millennium

People have been sailing on ships for millennia though, and people even before Eratosthenes saw how boats sink below the horizon instead of shrinking forever, but idk if that counts as an experiment

Also this
>During lunar eclipses, Aristotle observed that earth casts a curved shadow onto the surface of the moon
https://thecreationclub.com/the-shape-of-the-earth-aristotle-and-the-scientific-method/

>Aristotle was not the first person to argue that Earth is round – earlier arguments date back to the 6th century B.C. But Aristotle seems to be the first to offer observational evidence using the earth’s-shadow method.

According to this also only one millennium. Also apparently I was wrong about Eratosthenes since this is saying 6th century BC and Eratosthenes was like 1-2nd or something

IIRC, the flat-earth explanation for it is that it's a random undetected, unseeable, second moon or sister planet that causes the eclipse, and that one is round for some reason
Anonymous
No.165112
165114 165115 165122
reflection.jpg

Anonymous
No.165114
>>165112
>hey hey guys, heres another Facebook meme! This one is super smart too!
Anonymous
No.165115
286452613_420293330107649_8235356844800765131_n.mp4
>>165112
This is pure nonsense. Light and images aren't beams. You should be able to see the moon and it's reflection from multiple angles.
Anonymous
No.165122
165123 165124
ss.png
moonreflection2.png
>>165112
Kinda fun to make but I wish the meme didn't use such a dumb model since it's hard to get a nice trail reflection like in the image with these relative scales, though I also think I made my waves too high, and it's BSDF instead of a glass shader for actually reflective water since that would take way too long to render
Anonymous
No.165123
>>165122
*actually refractive water
Anonymous
No.165124
>>165122
Youre not taking that meme seriously, are you? Like, the image is so ridiculously modified that its absurd. Especially funny, givrn how flat earthers are all up in arms about "NASA edits" n shit. Like seriously, has one never seen a r3flection of the moon? Its not prominent, in fact the reflection of the moon is proportionate to its size in the night's sky, and such memes are disingenuous on their face.
But its quite obvious when it happens.
Anonymous
No.165125
165126
The flat earth thread is homosexual.
Every so often a new meme is posted, insulting people who know the earth is round. Flatties can't prove their world is flat, they just imitate a liberal's idea of conservative talking points like AI.
Speaking of AI...
Wouldn't it be funny to turn an AI racist like Tay?
https://youtu.be/hUQNiy4K7VU
Anonymous
No.165126
165127
>>165125
Not exactly mistaken, but still off-topic.

>>>/ub/5774 →
Anonymous
No.165127
>>165126
More like >>>/cyb/
Anonymous
No.165130
165135 165136 165143 165154
if you believe you're on a giant spinning ball.jpg

Anonymous
No.165135
165143 165147 165150
>>165130
>Polaris stays put
It just stays northish due to it's relative position to the pole of the northern hemisphere, tracing out a small circle. It still moves vaguely, it's just that you could only tell the significant distance if you were at the north pole. The night sky changes overtime anyway. It even changes with the seasons; that's why we can see different parts of the stars at different times of the year, and why people come up with horoscopes or whatever based on what stars are most visible on a particular month.
>19.2 billion miles
A mere inch in the vastness of space. The galaxy is absolutely enormous, and the void between galaxies is even bigger.
>Galaxy is moving
Polaris is part of the milky way Galaxy, so how far the galaxy is moving isn't isn't significantly relevant because Polaris would be moving at the same speed as our sun relative to all the other stars in the galaxy.
Anonymous
No.165136
165143 170387
main-qimg-cb29afe856747f531003b7f4fa15bdd0.gif
>>165130
https://www.quora.com/Has-an-amateur-astronomer-measured-a-stellar-parallax?share=1
This data was generated by Dennis di Cicco, impressively using mass produced 11 and then 16 inch Schmidt Cassegrain telescopes. The sine-like pattern is consistent with the expected parallax associated with Barnard's 1.833 parsec distance. It is worth noting that each of those points is derived from hundreds or thousands of digital images which were stacked, analyzed, and averaged to compensate for the disruptive effects of Earth's atmosphere, the greatest single hindrance to ground-based astrometry.
Anonymous
No.165143
>>165130
>>165135
>>165136
>ITT: OP shares an unsourced meme he found on Reddit/Facebook without even bothering to research the claims it makes for even one minute
Many such cases.
Anonymous
No.165147
165152
do-we-need-a-drop-second-the-worrying-reason-why-earth-may-be-speeding-up-after-decades-of-slowing-down-scaled.jpg
main1000_star-trail_4096x2734_406yq.jpg
polaris.jpg
>>165135
>It just stays northish due to it's relative position to the pole of the northern hemisphere, tracing out a small circle.
Sorry, not good enough.
That star is fixed and no amount of shilling can deny it. The heliocentric theory is bullocks,
Anonymous
No.165150
165152
Use-a-Sextant-Step-13.jpg
>>165135
>It still moves vaguely
I strongly disagree. When sailing, a sextant is used to know the current position, that's done pointing at Polaris and it is more than accurate. If the star moves, even slightly, the errors in the charts would be evident as they won't match with IRL coordinates.
Anonymous
No.165152
165154
>>165150
>>165147
It's movement is only visible in the middle of the Arctic circle. It is just barely off-center.
But that aside, how would that prove that the earth were flat?
Anonymous
No.165153
165170
Oh, as I went back over the thread I found this post: >>149123
It went through that arguement on how ships sink at horizon. How these ships reappear when you zoom in, meaning it the ship isn't hidden behind any curvature.
The only explanation to prove otherwise would be that those videos are fake, unlikely imo.

The second vid in this post shows and series of photos of a man walking away from a camera on football field. His lower body sinks below the horizon line. I can still not wrap my head around how this visual phenomena happens but clearly the football field is to small of a distance to experince any curvature.

I'm gonna try to recreate this as an experiment for myself. I'll lay with my cheek against hte ground of at the goalposts of a football field and then try to see the bottom of the bag I dropped at the other end.

If the bag's bottom is gone, this doesn't necessarily prove the earth is flat but it does prove that black man scientist is using faulty reasoning in his proofs in the last vid in this post. That alone speaks volumes to me.
Anonymous
No.165154
165155
>>165152
>But that aside, how would that prove that the earth were flat?
Pretty evident Sherlock, the supposedly ball is jumping non stop and therefore the stars on the dome should also move accordingly, but they don't because Earth is fixed and unmovable.
See >>165130 and plenty of posts above.
Anonymous
No.165155
165156
>>165154
The stars are part of the same galaxy, so they're moving with relative relation to the earth as well.
The sky changes over time, but it takes thousands of years because there's so much distance to travel.
This doesn't prove anything.
Anonymous
No.165156
165157
>>165155
>The sky changes over time, but it takes thousands of years because there's so much distance to travel.
>but it takes thousands of years
Exactly, nobody was there thousands of years ago. Just trust us. /s
Anonymous
No.165157
165158 165160
>>165156
>Implying if you don't personally see it, it can't possibly be true
Well, you could refer to ancient Egyptians who built a pyramid at exactly 30 degrees longitude and latitude in their time based on the stars above them, while the stars above them shifted to change those coordinates since then.

The sky changes over time. It has in human history.
And tbh, the sky changing slightly over time doesn't even necessitate the world being round. It could happen in flat earth too.
Anonymous
No.165158
165159 165161
>>165157
>Implying if you don't personally see it, it can't possibly be true
The Scientific Method demands that observations and experiments to be reproducible. If only a selected priest caste has the means to do it, more yet, their sponsors forbid anyone to build and fly airships without their consent and regulation, then the Scientific Method is violated and what is left are just myths based on faith.
Anonymous
No.165159
165162
>>165158
>observations and experiments to be reproducible
I I go through all the work to find the data for this and explain it step by step how they came to that conclusion, are you actually going to take it seriously, or are you going to just dismiss immediately because astronomers were the ones who did it?
Anonymous
No.165160
165167
>>165157
>And tbh, the sky changing slightly over time doesn't even necessitate the world being round. It could happen in flat earth too.
There is a theory about it, precisely the one suspecting that there is a lot more land beyond the Antarctic wall.
Anonymous
No.165161
>>165158
>has the means to do it
Okay, I know science is often controlled by corporate greed, but how do you expect the means for scientific experiments to be distributed evenly? Science has always been done by those with means: the equipment to do so isn't free.
Not denying the obvious corruption or conflicts of interest in the scientific communities or their sponsors, but I'm just curious about how you think scientific institutions should be run/funded.
Anonymous
No.165162
165163 165164 165166
>>165159
>I I go through all the work to find the data for this and explain it step by step how they came to that conclusion, are you actually going to take it seriously
I don't think so, your train of thought is about to pick "space", "cosmos", "gravitational forces" and alike up. All of them are demonstrable non-sense and a hoax.
Anonymous
No.165163
165165
>>165162
So, no, you wouldn't take it from astronomers then, even if they wrote their steps out entirely.
What kind of source would you even accept to prove it then? What is your standard of evidence?
Idk how anything is supposed to be proved if people go about dismissing those who dedicated their lives to studying the topics without reading them.
Anonymous
No.165164
>>165162
Forgot to call him Le Mason while you're at it.
Anonymous
No.165165
>>165163
>What kind of source would you even accept to prove it then?
A faceberg meme, of course.
Anonymous
No.165166
165168
>>165162
>demonstrable
These have been demonstrably reaffirmed by scientists all over the world who publish their results step-by-step. You're quick to dismiss those refutations as "NASA shilling" though.
Anonymous
No.165167
165169
>>165160
Do you seriously not think there's any land in Antarctica? You think all those photos are fake?
Anonymous
No.165168
165171
>>165166
>These have been demonstrably reaffirmed by scientists all over the world who publish their results step-by-step.
There is something very wrong with their science. No curve ---> no planet ---> no space ---> no cosmos ---> no gravity
Just not finding the curve makes the whole "science" fall down like a house of cards.
Anonymous
No.165169
165172 165174
>>165167
What is beyond the Antarctic wall is unknown, pictures and video only show a few kilometers from the shore, exploration is forbidden under threats of violence.
Anonymous
No.165170
165173
File (hide): 7BC84C13BFF96086DB7D0FA6C10FC6C2-3335168.mp4 (3.2 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:39, Sven? Is that you?.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Sven? Is that you?.mp4
>>165153
>but it does prove that black man scientist is using faulty reasoning in his proofs
Anonymous
No.165171
165182
>>165168
>curve
The curve has been shown evidently by hundreds of sources. You've been selectively choosing results that reaffirm your worldview.
But of course, anyone who isn't a shady YouTuber or a Facebook memer is a NASA shill, right?
>space
Holy shit, the world doesn't even need to be round for that. It is a fact of life that the air gets thinner with higher altitude. Go hiking in the mountains after spending a year at sea level and you'll know.
Can you not even imagine a "realm" where the air is so thin that there's basically nothing at all?
That aside, there's hundreds of different forms of evidence that space exists, but I'm not even going to bother listing them this time because all of the other times I did you called them "NASA shills".
>no cosmos
The "cosmos" are whatever you see in the sky above you: something you can literally see.
>no gravity
Again, has been confirmed and reaffirmed in so many different ways, but you wouldn't accept even a single source that contradicts your worldview. So now we're just contradicting each other to no end.
Anonymous
No.165172
165182
>>165169
>We'd totally prove our worldview, but the scary NASAmasons would kill us!
They can't stop Japs from hunting whale to extinction there, but they can somehow track every individual who sets foot on the ice and have caught everyone who's tried to see past it?
What utter bullshit. For a group of people who claim to be rebelling against the new world order, you lot come off as awfully cowardly. Imagine being afraid of blue helmets.
Anonymous
No.165173
maud.png
>>165170
PewDiePie knows.
Anonymous
No.165174
165175
>>165169
>exploration is forbidden
You know scientists go to Antarctica for research all of the time, right? It's not that hard to get approved. I had a professor who went there.
Anonymous
No.165175
165176
anonfilly - not impressed.png
>>165174
>You know scientists go to Antarctica for research all of the time, right?
Not sure if you think people are stupid or your IQ is below 60.
Anonymous
No.165176
165178
>>165175
I don't expect you to believe it. You're probably just going to call them fakes/shills.
Anonymous
No.165178
>>165176
Well, we have already millions of nurses and doctors who denied reality by going along with a non-existent epidemic, because of the money. And this is a glaring example of how corrupt humanity has become.
Anonymous
No.165182
>>165171
>>165172
Welcome to the flat earth thread, where all your carefully constructed arguments will be summarily ignored, and OP will insist that his boomer-tier memes make sense
Anonymous
No.165218
165219
https://youtu.be/P4l9Y5OHqpk
Anonymous
No.165219
165220
not impressed.png
>>165218
>8:06 - The genesis of the modern Flat Earth Society
You are being way too dishonest, it is well known that the Flat Earth Society is controlled opposition used to ridicule Flat Earth.
Either you demonstrate the curvature or you have no case.
Anonymous
No.165220
165221
>>165219
>posting a video is dishonest
Sure thing bud. What is it when you've been presented with dozens of resources that display curvature, but refuse to even acknowledge the post (presumably to avoid illustraying that you cant contest the points, other than to maybe claim nasa/mason/wtfe shill)?
Hint, it's related to the word 'ignore'
Anonymous
No.165221
165222
>>165220
>What is it when you've been presented with dozens of resources that display curvature
Which has been debunked over and over again in the bread.
>Hint, it's related to the word 'ignore'
I agree. Projecting much?
Anonymous
No.165222
165223
>>165221
>saying mason or nasa once and then never adding anything is 'debunking'
>also you're the one who's ignorant
Right? All those equations and calcularions and historic citations, the moon, the tides, all 'debunked' cuz Eric Dubay cant into actual science, and OP cant into critical thinking.
Anonymous
No.165223
165224 165226
pathetic.png
>>165222
>All those equations and calcularions and historic citations, the moon, the tides, all 'debunked' cuz Eric Dubay
Nope, all debunked by IRL experiments and observations.
At this point you are not even pretending with your shilling.
Anonymous
No.165224
>>165223
>debunked by IRL experiments and observations from people performing irrelevant and inadmissible as evidence due to alack of controls
Ftfy
Anonymous
No.165226
165341 165347
>>165223
>all debunked by IRL experiments and observations.
None of that met generally accepted standards of quality or precision for experiments.
>shilling
Do you actually think that, or are you just talking out of your ass? You think Anons here argue with you because they're paid to do it, and not just because you keep shoving absurdist nonsense in their faces?
So long as this crap keeps coming up on the overboard, idiots are still going to take the bait and reply to it. There is no shilling, because they do it for free.
Anonymous
No.165341
165344 165346 165347
>>165226
Ridiculous notions demand ridicule; it's flat-shaming.
Anonymous
No.165344
165346 165347
flat.jpg
>>165341
No, THIS is flat-shaming.
Anonymous
No.165346
7e2.gif
>>165341
>>165344
>flat-shaming
Amateurs.
Anonymous
No.165347
165348
globers.png
>>165226
>>165341
>>165344
>globers
Anonymous
No.165348
>>165347
>Mark Twain
All that ad homenim, and you just quoted a literal, open, known Freemason.
Which is not to discredit the quote; it's a decent quote, but an example how something can make sense despite who says it, so long as it's substantial.
Think of that next time you dismiss/discredit a scientific study because people in the business of studying space might be affiliated with NASA, and judge the arguments on the substance and not the speaker.
Anonymous
No.165398
165399
startrails_firmament_equator_perspective_container.png
Lake_Michigan_01.jpg
1659921312913834.jpg
1659785860516509.jpg
Give up already globeheads
Anonymous
No.165399
>>165398
Lmao
Anonymous
No.165426
165427 165439
Think the NASA moon hoax is bad - Check out the Russian moon hoax.mp4
>Think the NASA moon hoax is bad? Check out the Russian moon hoax
>Actual broadcast footage of a Russian lander on the moon. Hey? Who paved the roads on the moon for your toy to move across?
And the normies still swallow this swill.
Anonymous
No.165427
165433
>>165426
What are these videos from?
Anonymous
No.165433
165436
>>165427
Russian space program, landing on the moon.
Anonymous
No.165434
165435
How to Fake Space by Astronaut Karen Nyberg.mp4
>How to Fake Space by Astronaut Karen Nyberg
Anonymous
No.165435
>>165434
You're right. The obvious children's show should have chartered a trip to space so that fan submissions can be authentically displayed in zero gravity. In the 70's, by the video quality.
Nothing ridiculous about that position.
Anonymous
No.165436
165437
>>165433
I mean where can I find the video? What's this one called.
Anonymous
No.165437
165438
>>165436

>Russian Lunar Lander
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9R9kZMV1lw
Anonymous
No.165438
165439
>>165437
As I suspected: this was a promotional video, not actual footage.
>"The LK Russian: Lunniy Korabl (Лунный корабль—"lunar ship") was a Soviet lunar lander and counterpart of the American Lunar Module (LM). The LK was to have landed up to two cosmonauts on the Moon. It completed development and was test flown successfully in Earth orbit, but never reached the Moon because development of the N1 rocket, which was required to take the Lunar Lander to the Moon, was unsuccessful."
This was never meant to be presented as real.
Anonymous
No.165439
>>165438
>>165426
This isn't a hoax. It's a demo video to show how the fober was supposed to drive. It was released before the launch was scheduled. It wasn't meant to be passed off as real.
Anonymous
No.165440
165441
Ffs, this is why you have to read the descriptions of things before sharing them. What a waste of time.
Anonymous
No.165441
165465
>>165440
>What a waste of time.
It is not. Most people have no idea that the Russian and Chinese, not to mention Iran, North Korea and Japan, are also involved in the space hoax.
Anonymous
No.165442
165443 165445
Hey guys did you know the earth is flat and space is a myth and stars aren't real? It's true, because a meme calls everyone who disagrees stupid. Just look at the sky outside and tell me if you see Venus or Keppler or Todano or Anur any other alien world. If there are no aliens why do no aliens want to have sex with me hmm? Clearly the crests are to blame. Get owned globetard. It is as the genius Kanye East said...
>AEIOU stars arent real
Anonymous
No.165443
165450
25c.jpg
>>165442
Anonymous
No.165444
165454
644566__artist+needed_safe_oc_oc+only_oc-colon-bundle+joy_argument+in+the+comments_background+pony+strikes+again_debate+in+the+comments_oh+boy+here+we+go_old+b.jpg
The Earth is round like a pregnant mare
Anonymous
No.165445
165452
>>165442
>space is a myth and stars aren't real?
Well, you can see by yourself. >>155834
Anonymous
No.165450
165452
7ecde4.png
>>165443
>Black science man
>a nigger able to grasp time and abstractions
Totally credible. /s
Anonymous
No.165452
>>165450
Says the fag posting facebook memes and shit
>>165445
>Science says acturus is like, super far. But like, I can tots see it. Checkmate globeys
Anonymous
No.165454
165460 165467
1946b1181d03ccbd23a2b30eaced23f1.png
>>165444
>The Earth is round Flat like a pregnant mare
Fixed for ya
Anonymous
No.165460
>>165454
Show me a pregnant mare that's flat
Anonymous
No.165461
165464
Go on, you took the bait. You 'fixed that for me', so pony up. Show me the flat pregnant mare that 'fixes' what I said.
Anonymous
No.165464
964142__safe_crossover_tank_space_artist-colon-pixelkitties_equestria_elephant_discworld_flat+earth_great+a'tuin.png
>>165461
>Go on, you took the bait.
Yeah right.
Anonymous
No.165465
165468
>>165441
That video literally wasn't a hoax, because it was publicly a promotional video.
The waste of time is that the poster presented it as if it had been passed-off as real footage, which it never was.
Anonymous
No.165467
165469 165471
images (6).jpeg
>>165454
Since when are pregnant mares flat?
Anonymous
No.165468
165470
>>165465
>The waste of time is that the poster presented it as if it had been passed-off as real footage
It is obvious that no cameraman would be already on the moon to film the landing.
Anonymous
No.165469
>>165467
Sexy.
Anonymous
No.165470
>>165468
Yeah, because it's not supposed to be real. It's literally just a promo video, like the ones you see in toy stores.
Anonymous
No.165471
>>165467
Tha k you
Anonymous
No.165479
165512
Hey OP, what's the speed of light?
Anonymous
No.165480
If the earth is flat why are boobies round?
Anonymous
No.165510
165512 165513 165514
qas.jpg
August 16, 2022.
>Why are There No Flat Earth Whistle-Blowers?
>When confronted with objective, demonstrable, empirical proof that Earth is not a fantastical tilting, wobbling, spinning space-ball, one sticking point that globe defenders consistently revert back to is, if the evidence flat Earthers are presenting is true, then why has there not been a single whistle-blower to come forward and expose this mother of all conspiracies? How is it possible that not one of the hundreds of thousands of people that NASA has employed over the decades has come forward and admitted the hoax? What about the Russians, the Chinese, the Japanese and all the other government space agencies along with SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin and other corporate space enterprises? If Earth is not a globe and we never went to the Moon, why haven't these governments or corporations tattletaled on each other and exposed this massive lie to the masses?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-are-There-No-Flat-Earth-Whistle-Blowers:f
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LJGKUCpVhHi1/
Anonymous
No.165511
>165510
>objective, demonstrable, empirical proof
Gaslighting, again. Your lack of comprehension dpes not constitute evidence
Anonymous
No.165512
>>165510
since you missed it the first time:
>>165479
Anonymous
No.165513
165515
>>165510
Eric Dubay is a glow-op plant from an actual Freemason family, who propagates strawman nonsense about Flat Earth to discredit the Flat Earth movement and quash free and open discourse on the subject so that his followers stay distracted from researching real inconsistencies.
Anonymous
No.165514
165515
>>165510
I can't believe people still support this IFER shill. He talks past his audience and distracts them all the while discouraging actual independent flat earth research while sicking his Facebook trannies on independent researchers who dare to contradict him.
Anonymous
No.165515
165516 165540
shill.jpg
>>165513
>>165514
>shilling hard
Not good enough. Try again.
By the way, if you can find the curve, please post it here.
Anonymous
No.165516
165517
>>165515
>Criticize Eric (((Dubay)))'s monopolizing of Flat Earth discourse and censoring any criticism of Jesuits on his platform
>Somehow this is shilling in behalf of... Someone?
Nice try tranny. Go back to licking the boots of that lying Hofjuden. Surely there is no connection between the groups. They're totally uninvolved, because that "well-researched" said so. No further discussion is required.
Anonymous
No.165517
165518 165540
>>165516
Stay on topic. Proof of the curvature may help a lot.
Anonymous
No.165518
165519
>>165517
Where did I say that there was a so-called curve? I'm saying that Eric and his trannies are full of shit and have been subverting the movement for years with his bullshit.
>Stay on topic
So long as Eric Dubay and his shills keep monopolizing flat earth research, he IS the topic. He's got more than half the movement wrapped around his finger, and he's using his """credibility""" to silence independent researchers.
Anonymous
No.165519
165520 165522
>>165518
>So long as Eric Dubay and his shills keep monopolizing flat earth research, he IS the topic.
Absurd.
A man doesn't make the subject, but physical reality. Stop gaslighting with not related wild claims and stick to the topic.
Anonymous
No.165520
165521
>>165519
He doesn't make the subject, he monopolizes it. That's why he torpedos opposing flat earthers all of the time and bans them from his platforms. He is a fucking plant and a profiteer manipulating people looking for truth.
Anonymous
No.165521
165522
ur gay.gif
>>165520
>He doesn't make the subject, he monopolizes it.
You are choosing to go personal, and again, it is off topic.
Anonymous
No.165522
165523
27564__safe_artist-colon-takua770_applejack_pony_season+2_the+return+of+harmony_female_high+res_long+neck_reaction+image_simple+background_smug_solo_transpare.png
>>165519
>not related wild claims
How is blatant controlled opposition not related? This is the thread about the globers mythos, isn't it? Eric Dubay is a part of the whole NASA glow-op coverup. His job is to keep flat earth researchers eating sterilized breadcrumbs out of his palm to make them easier to control and prevent truthers from taking decisive action. I wouldn't be surprised if he reports directly to the 32nd Degree while laughing about how his fans uplift him as a "leader" in "opposition" to Judeao-freemasonry. That race-mixing turbonigger has been taking his own followers for fools, and his sockpuppet Thai tranny worshippers only reinforce his cult of personality.
>>165521
>muh topic
Oh, what are you gonna do, tranny? Are you gonna ban me from the thread like your savior Eric does to all the other independent researchers on his forums? Are you gonna go cry to the mods? Can't handle criticism of an obvious 32nd Degree Jesuit plant? Give me a fucking break. Newsflash: just because someone tells bits and pieces of truth doesn't mean they're not USING YOU.
Anonymous
No.165523
165524
bait.jpg
>>165522
>Eric Dubay is a part of the whole NASA glow-op coverup
Substantiate the claim. Go on, I'm interested.
Anonymous
No.165524
165525 165527 165540
007 and two ball cane Masons Symbol of dyslexic thinking that Esua ruled over Jacob_small.jpg
>>165523
He is from a Freemason family. His own great uncle was a member of the 32'd Degree, and Eric himself has been seen wearing masonic pins before he got into this.
You don't think it's weird how so much of the flat earth truth movement revolves around one personality? How, despite uncontested control of the media by NASA, Dubay has never been substantially threatened? Why his videos alone are so easy to access on the internet, when even toothless clowns like Alex Jones need to keep jumping platforms? How he's able to post his videos with impunity while others are silenced or killed every day? Why he's able to have such a following despite whistleblowers being treated, killed and made examples of? There's an obvious reason why they won't get rid of him: he's no threat to them. His purpose is to control the narrative so that independent researchers can't make achievements, and so that his videos smother any groundbreaking discoveries and prevent action from being taken so that Flat Earth researcher can't make any gains.
And based on his behavior, he's done a good job of that. He's got an enormous following of Facebook normies who believe everything he tells them just because they include crumbs of truth that NASA doesn't consider to be threatening to the narrative, and more importantly he keeps them from looking into things that could actually harm them, like the Jesuit connection between the Freemasons and the globist hoax.
He talks about Jews the same way other controlled opposition clowns like Spencer do, while not saying anything that could actually cause them to face consequences. And despite "calling out" Jews on the globist narrative, he's painfully silent on the other more atrocious crimes of the Jews, like white replacement and genocide (which he willfully participates in by cohorting with Thai trannies).
He silences skeptics and voices that dare to try to turn the narrative away from himself so he can ensure that all flat earth discussions stay on topic related to whatever he just posted that month.
Anonymous
No.165525
165528
>>165524
>His own great uncle was a member of the 32'd Degree
Yup, and he publicly disavowed him and cut all ties.
>He silences skeptics and voices that dare to try to turn the narrative away from himself
Incorrect, he bans shills and any other trying to derail the subject, like (you).
Anonymous
No.165527
165530
>>165524
>He talks about Jews the same way other controlled opposition clowns like Spencer do, while not saying anything that could actually cause them to face consequences.
Not true. Dubay is known for praising NatSoc and avoiding any contact with jews promoting Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165528
165529
large (25).png
>>165525
>he publicly disavowed him
Only after it was pointed out repeatedly and he could no longer cover it up.
>he bans shills and any other trying to derail the subject, like (you).
Oh, so anyone who criticizes Dubay and his impotent vicegrip on the flat earth research community is a shill who needs to be silenced? Nobody can have that opinion genuinely? Anyone who opposes /ourguy/, not flat earth, is a shill? A heretic that must be purged by the Jesuit oath?
That really says a lot about what you think of him.
>>>r/The_Donald
Might be more your speed.
Don't let the door hit you in the maggot-ridden faux vagina on the way out.
Anonymous
No.165529
165531
di.png
>>165528
Slander is all you got. Very jewy of (you).
Anonymous
No.165530
165532
>>165527
>praising NatSoc
So did Spencer. That doesn't make him legitimate, nor does it make him an actual threat to Jews.
It's not just what you say about Jews, but what you say should be done about them, and the results thereof.
At this stage, it doesn't actually bother Jews to be implicated in the glove conspiracy, because the average globist normie is so deep in the works that it doesn't effectively harm them; in fact, Jews have weaponized the words of impotent glow-ops like Eric Dubay to not only discredit Flat Earth researchers, but to discredit truthers about Judaism too.
If he actually cared about removing Jews, he'd list the names of more specific Jews who've directly leading the globist agenda, but he won't because that might put his continued Hofjuden shekels in jeopardy.
Stop acting like this faggot is your savior just because he's "brave" and keeps telling you what you want to hear. It's barely better that taking narratives directly from NASA.
Anonymous
No.165531
165532
>>165529
Oh, pardon. Was I wrong about what I said? Are you willing to refute that, or are you too afraid that Eric "Trust The Plan" Dubay might not actually be on your side?
Open your fucking eyes.
Anonymous
No.165532
165533
f18ae5c279dd3a79ac5fb0d72da2fcf5.jpg
>>165530
>>165531
>slanderous shilling
Would you mind to return to the bread's topic.
Anonymous
No.165533
165534
56xe4d.png
>>165532
>implying criticism of a major player in globist agenda isn't on topic
>getting this buttmad about the reputation of a lying crypto-Jesuit
Topkek. Why are dubtroons so mad about the fact that they're being MKULTRA'd
Anonymous
No.165534
165535
d9g0gf4-343547aa-88f5-4cd9-9b39-035322a59e14.png
>>165533
Anonymous
No.165535
165536
2630334__artist+needed_safe_oc_oc+only_oc-colon-flat+earth_earth+pony_pony_high+res_pointing_solo.png
>>165534
>I'm not butthurt at all
>D-don't mind that I replied to it 10 times!
The absolute state of Dubay trannies.
I can see that you're stuck too far up his gaping AIDs-ridden asshole to be convinced, but next time you tune in to one one his videos, pay attention to what he DOESN'T say just as much as you consider what he does.
Anonymous
No.165536
165537
f7g78ui.png
>>165535
(((They))) aren't sending their best anymore.
Goodnight.
Anonymous
No.165537
165538
0c8.png.acac4c5955353d4053f4cb859af906a7.png
>>165536
Of course they aren't. They're sending faggots like Eric and his orbiters.
Sweet dreams, tranny.
Anonymous
No.165538
165539
nugu.png
>>165537
In case you missed, take a look to the book title, faggot.
Anonymous
No.165539
165540
large (26).png
>>165538
>N-no you're the infiltrator! There's no way Eric could be!
I see you haven't actually gone to bed. Typical Dubay simp, just has to put one more word in when his husbando is insulted.
Next you're probably going to go crying to the mods like you do on all his platforms.
Anonymous
No.165540
165541 165542
>>165515
>>165517
You mean other than the pics and video that you keep choking except to claim 'debunked' without merit?
>>165524
Ngl, that IS interesting
>>165539
Thank you, that was hilarious. I hope you dont honestly think a flat earth is a credible position, but I appreciate you taking the time to indicate how unsupportable Dubay/OP is in their position.
Anonymous
No.165541
165542 165544
FXSi_V1UcAAIi59.png
>>165540
Watch your fucking mouth, globist.
Anonymous
No.165542
165543 165544
>>165540
>>165541
>coping
Seriously, would you mind to bring hard scientific facts instead of character assassination and straw mans?
Anonymous
No.165543
>>165542
>the burden of proof is on YOU, goy!
What do you want some bank receipt from his Jesuit overlords? You want me to get one from every other NASA shill in the world too? I guess I'll just call their accountant.
>His actions speak for themselves. Have you seen how hard he polices his chat forums? He's fine letting his troons regurgitate whatever he says, but when people try to actually take action he shuts down, silences and bans dissenters. If anyone ever dares to post the addresses of masonic lodges in his chats for the sake of organizing LEGAL protests/watches around them, he has us kicked immediately. He's the enemy of anyone who ever wants to take action to settle this movement nearly 70 years in the making, because he's made it about himself.
But we'll totally just beat the globers by converting one Facebook boomer at a time, amirite? No reason to organize around lodges? No reason to demand open debates? No reason to have independent research in the flat earth community? Surely, the problems will just fix themselves, right?
You are an eceleb-worshipping simp. You take any criticism of that troon-enabling racemixer as an affront to the movement, not a critique on his bloated ego. Flat earth was doing fine before he came about. We'd all be better off without him.
But surely, I'm just a shill, right? Surely NASA pays me to shitpost about him on this board, when you and I both know they have the resources to kill him and make it look like a yoga accident, if they actually wanted to that is (they don't).
Anonymous
No.165544
165545
>>165541
Theres that ignorant narcissism that flat earthers are known for. Post more ebin FB maymays yo!
>>165542
So, NOT the video of a supertanker very clearly, slowly, and deliberately crossing over the horizon, as well as a multitude of other evidence that any rational thinking person would realize refutes the whole premise?
Anonymous
No.165545
165547
mocking.png
>>165544
>perspective and refraction
Try again against a hard laser shore to shore. You can't beat that baller.
Anonymous
No.165547
165548
>>165545
>perspective and refraction explains why ships disappear over the horizon
As I said, ignorant narcissim
Speaking of lasers, I assume you have conducted the experiment?
Also speaking of lasers, thanks Bob
Anonymous
No.165548
165549
>>165547
My latest post was about that ship thing. The counter arguement that I found in this thread, it's relatively early in the thread, to the idea that ships "sinks" at the horizon because of the curvature was a video were a guy zoomed out from having a perfectly in view and then it disappeared into the horizon. I think it "sunk" as he zoomed out but it went a bit fast, so it's a bit hard to tell.

The explanation was that the image of the ship converges with the horizon and the first part of it is the bottom part of it. Kinda like foreshortening in drawing, the building's wall that is closests to you is larger then the wall further away but in reality they are both the same size.

I have tested and the horizon does indeed follow eye-level, at least for the height of a human being. Meaning, if you lay down or stand up the horizon follows. This means you test if these visual phenomena exists. All you need is a relatively short distance of flat ground and something to place at the end. Then you can lay down at the other end and if you can't see the object on this parallel and flat distance because the horizon obscures the bottom this phenomena exists and therefore puts the proof of ships sinking at the horizon in question. I haven't found a flat enough surface yet, the pitch I found had a hill in the middle of it. But Neil Tyson made this arguement in one of these videos so if this is true it shows that, he, a professional astrophysist and Ph.D guy, uses faulty proofs.

Anyway, I'm gonna try to find some flat surfaces.
Anonymous
No.165549
165550 165552 165778
>>165548
Yes, and thats a bullshit argument given that the zoom out occurs toward the end of the video, after the overwhelming majority of the ship has already slowly disappeared past the horizon.
And that says nothing of the dozens of pieces of evidence which OP has simply opted to ignore (read: ignorance) because he knows his only recourse is to either fuck off for a few days and come back with more FB memes, or to make non-arguments with le smug pony reaction.
Like thelaser gyroscope incident which IS LITERALLY NOT POSSIBLE on a flat earth.
For the record, Im NOT a globe advocate, Im actually a 'broken egg' advocate, which allows for BOTH the instances of curious findings/readings, WHILE acknowledging and allowing for OBVIOUS proof that the earth ISN'T flat, including and not limited to the laser gyroscope.
But OP isnt interested in coming to a consensus, he just wants to posture like him and Dubay are smarter than fucking EVERYONE, when their own 'evidence' doesnt pass muster.
Anonymous
No.165550
165551 165552
>>165549
>But OP isnt interested in coming to a consensus, he just wants to posture like him and Dubay are smarter than fucking EVERYONE
Jealous.
Anonymous
No.165551
>>165550
And theres the narcissism
Anonymous
No.165552
165554
>>165549
>Dubay
The problem with Dubay isn't him being narcissistic, ignorant or wrong. It's that he's intentionally manipulating other flat-earthers into only discussing the sterile flavor of dialog that his Jesuit masters deem to be acceptable and banning them whenever they drop real truth bombs or organize action to expose the masons.
The globe hoax will continue so long as controlled opposition like Dubay leads flat earth research.
>>165550
But of course his tranny orbiters will always spring to action to defend him. Dr. Rodchareon's sessions aren't cheap, right?
Keep up those yoga lessions. Try hard enough and a drunk might mistake you for FEMALE.
Anonymous
No.165554
165556
>>165552
>jesuits and masons
Oh, youre also intellectually lazy/dishonest. For sport, can you validate that position, or are you likewise "super duper sure"?
>globe hoax
Oh ffs, theres more of them.
Lads, you know who you are, I warned you this would happen.
Anonymous
No.165556
165560
large (27).png
>>165554
The Dubay clan are generational satanists with deep proven connections to the U.S. Army and CIA, and his disgusting Thai concubine is confirmed elite Thai Hofjuden of the Thai Royal Army (aka Masons). They troon-out their offspring from infancy in their perverse NWO Baphomet worship. Just look at his "father"'s feminine shoulder and hip proportions: evidentiary of being a FTM tranny. Eric himself was videotape crossdressing in 'his' youth.
He parades his orbiters with crumbs of truth while stopping them from looking at the big fish. That's IFERS was always so heavily moderated. That's why he keeps banning people for asking too many questions, making constructive criticisms: his JOB is to control the narrative to keep FE under NWO control, so that (((they))) get to decide what gets released and when through the mouth of their false-prophet glow-op whore.
Anonymous
No.165557
165560 165774
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S82LeZG_Ojs
Anonymous
No.165560
165568
>>165556
>>165557
That was excellent anon. 5/5 stars, your video confirmed a LOT of things I had intuited.
However, it neglects the point that the Earth is demonstrably not flat. Not saying it's 'round' like contemporary science suggests it is (which I refute btw) but it is conclusively not flat, and if you are wont to suggest it is,... well die in fire cuz you're lost the plot.
Anonymous
No.165568
165569
>>165560
>it neglects the point that the Earth is demonstrably not flat.
Of course not, the plane has some mountains in the middle.
Anonymous
No.165569
165570
>>165568
My only hope for this thread is that you'll realize what an insipid fuckwit you are, and lament all the bullshit you have spewn from your fingertips.
Though, there's no doubt that you'll ever admit to it, such is the narcissism you have liberally displayed.
I don't contest that there are issues with the professed globe model, I've admitted it previously; having said, a rational person could use the multitude of evidence - yours included - to conclude that the earth is not flat. That you persist is on you, and I wish you well in that realization.
Anonymous
No.165570
165572
>>165569
Don't forget about the firmament, and the gravity hoax.
Anonymous
No.165572
>>165570
Yes, the firmament and gravity hoax - as depicted by ignorant retards - is also completely false, baseless, and the sort of thing only a child who likewise believes in Santa Claus would deem credible, thanks for the reminder.
Anonymous
No.165573
And yes, I did phrase that to allow you to posture more. Do be so kind
Anonymous
No.165578
165579 165581 165942
File (hide): 7A665D474099D45C59FAAA24024CD3EA-7061471.mp4 (6.7 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:24, LOCAL SUN.mp4) [play once] [loop]
LOCAL SUN.mp4
It doesn't look like the sun is millions of miles away at all.
Anonymous
No.165579
165580
>>165578
Only if you're retarded
Anonymous
No.165580
what.png
>>165579
How so?
Anonymous
No.165581
165590
>>165578
How doesn't it?
Anonymous
No.165590
>>165581
Who doesn't it?
Anonymous
No.165594
Meanwhile
https://youtube.com/shorts/T0f6u39jlRA?feature=share
Carl Sagan explaining how ancient Greeks knew the Earth is round
Anonymous
No.165723
165724 165729
Serious question for non-flatties:
Which of the following conspiracy theory groups is MORE plausible?
Flat Earth
-or-
Q anon
?
Anonymous
No.165724
165725
>>165723
Q Anon is the belief that there are good Jews, which is bollocks. It's clearly a Psyop to convince the boomers to sit around and do nothing.
The world turning out to be flat all along is impossible, and more likely than the existence of a good Jew.
Anonymous
No.165725
165726
>>165724
So, you acknowledge that they are comparably ridiculous, impossible, and lacking any evidence that can pass basoc standards?
Anonymous
No.165726
165727
what.png
>>165725
>conflating the Q psyop with well documented and undeniable Flat Earth
Ahem. Have you even read this bread?
Anonymous
No.165727
>>165726
Glow harder faggot
Anonymous
No.165729
>>165723
QAnon is just a bunch of other individual conspiracy theories lumped together by feds to discredit them. It included stuff like Epstein sex trafficking and other plausible scenarios.
Anonymous
No.165737
165739
13.jpeg

Anonymous
No.165739
>>165737
How is this confusing?
When you're at the south pole, every direction is north.
If you were at some ice ring, any place on the ring would be facing north.
Anonymous
No.165771
165774
1f9837468fb4b771.jpg
>How Can Ushuaia Get 17 Hours of Daylight on a Flat Earth?
>During December every year Ushuaia, Argentina, the southern-most city in the world, just below the 54th southern latitude receives over 17 hours of daylight with a maximum of 17 hours and 20 minutes occurring on the Winter Solstice. Globe Earthers often claim this would be impossible on a flat Earth arguing that a local, revolving, spotlight Sun should not be able to illuminate such a southern location for so long.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/How-Can-Ushuaia-Get-17-Hours-of-Daylight-on-a-Flat-Earth:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p1BIY7u71dS9/
Anonymous
No.165774
165775 165794
>>165771
>the dome firmament is solid glass
Keep grasping at straws, dumbass
>>165557
Frenly reminder
Anonymous
No.165775
165776 165777 165779 165780
9ed6a.png
>>165774
>firmament is solid glass
Your words, not Dubay's
>Dubay exposed
Already debunked.
Anonymous
No.165776
>>165775
No, those are definitely his words. So, how does air travel work if the dome is solid? Cuz a hemisphere prism doesnt leave room for,... mountains, for example.
Anonymous
No.165777
165794
1538329986868.jpg
>>165775
2:52 - "If our Earth plane is covered by a crystalline translucent dome firmament"
Anonymous
No.165778
165781 165790
>>165549
>Yes, and thats a bullshit argument given that the zoom out occurs toward the end of the video, after the overwhelming majority of the ship has already slowly disappeared past the horizon.
Sorry, I don't really follow, could you elaborate.
Anonymous
No.165779
>>165775
>debunked
Citation needed
Anonymous
No.165780
>>165775
Where was that debunked?
Anonymous
No.165781
165807
>>165778
Begging your pardon, but I just spent an hour trying to sift through this whole fucking thread, just to find the video, and I still havent, so no I cant give a more comprehensive answer tha. To refer3nce these stills, which are clearly at the sameleve of zoom.
>>164572
Anonymous
No.165790
165807
>>165778
Found it!
>>163405
So. In this video, we watch the slow and painstaking process of supertanker making a right turn while descending over the horizon. Yes, the videographer zooms out and back in on occasion, however the zoom out and in occurs very fast, and couldn't cause the viewer to think that the slow, gradual dissapearance over the horizon has anything to do with the zoom.
Unless you're a flat earth glownigger like OP, that is
Anonymous
No.165794
165795
>>165777
>If our Earth plane is covered by a crystalline translucent dome firmament"
It is very different to:
>>165774
>firmament is solid glass

Would you mind to take some English comprehension classes?
Anonymous
No.165795
165797
>>165794
The effect was produced by a solid prism.
Unless this is crystal magic where a crystal dome produces the same effect as a prism, you're full of shit and you know it, glownigger.
Anonymous
No.165796
>inb4 some mlp image from the crystal empire against sombra n shit
Anonymous
No.165797
165798
>>165795
>The effect was produced by a solid prism
Actually a solid semi-sphere, then Dubay introduces the gas ionization phenomena and the difference between sunlight and day light.
Don't be a faggot a stop lying.
Anonymous
No.165798
165800
>>165797
So for the record, are you staking the claim that ionized gas produces a prismic effect?
Yes, it's a hemisphere but its still prismic (as in, effect), by your insistence.
Anonymous
No.165800
165801
1pcs-Prism-Laser-Beam-Combine-Cube-Prism-for-405nm-450nm-Blue-Laser-Diode-5W-for-Optical.jpg
sneha-b-volume-of-triangular-prism-07-1606298603.png
>>165798
>prismic effect?
Anon, it is obvious that gasses don't meet the prism definition. You are confusing the term perhaps with light diffusion (Physics 101).
Anonymous
No.165801
>>165800
However you did insist on a transparent mysterious solid dome which does fall on as prismatic effect, not only that the speed of light through the various mediums should be calculatable as with the energy required.
Some fuckery is going on.
Not only that but everything that goes on everywhere has to be described in detail and all the stuff has to match up.
I mean this should be a trifle really, in a solid dome the fuck is space rocks that land.
Anonymous
No.165802
165803
dRBDrCrnHQrNyOwH32sl8Kpn.jpg
>Flat Earth - Meteors, Comets and Craters
>Meteors, meteorites, asteroids, comets, and shooting stars are not what you have been led to believe.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/FlatEarth-MeteorsCometsandCraters:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ZogXzFn5Vqw/
Anonymous
No.165803
165804
>>165802
>"Space junk don't exist dumbass."
- Eric "Sphereroids? More like hemorrhoids." Dubay
Anonymous
No.165804
4700.png
>>165803
There's another interesting theory about objects falling from the dome. Not substantiated but it gives food for thought.
>Meteors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3TVlW8PXkw
Anonymous
No.165807
165808
>>165781
>>165790
Thanks for your reply.
I was actually thinking of these videos, reposting them here for the ease of access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk&ab_channel=EricDubay
6:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
3:14
What do you think about them? The timestamps are the ones that discuss ship's hulls going over the horizon first.
Anonymous
No.165808
165810
>>165807
But again, that's horseshit.
When we're talking about ladies walking, or cars driving, the relative area where the distortive visual effect is at MAX 2', which is acceptable given the threshold of the distortion.

In the video I provided, we're talking about watching AN ENTIRE SUPERTANKER, OVER 100' TALL, SLOWLY CROSS THE VISUAL THRESHOLD OF THE HORIZON.

We are not the same.
Anonymous
No.165809
R.jpg

Anonymous
No.165810
>>165808
To further clarify this point.
According to Eric Bidet, the proportion of the distorted object (ship) that is obscured is relative to the distance and pverall volume. Meaning, as something becomes more distant and miniscule, the more of it's body becomes obscured, at least if the earth was flat. Which it is not.
You can tell using the ship video, because the overwhelming width of the ship is quite prominent right up until the point that it disappears over the horizon.
Again to Bidet's assertion, the proportion of the vehicle that is distorted should be relative to the overall volume. Thats observably not the case. The entire height of the ship dsappears over the horizon WELL before the width does so. Unless they sailed into a sea of piranha solution, and that supertanker got dissolved from the base up, it is impossible for the flat earth model to account for the ship's disappearance, no matter HOW many straws of 'perspective' and 'zoom' one grasps at.
Simply put, when one comprehends physics, math, proportion, etc. - regardless of what their opinion of round/flat earth - that ONE video conclusively proves that the earth is not flat.
Which is also why OP won't touch that video with a 10 foot pole.
That he persists with this flat earth nonsense while knowing that his position is literally impossible - no matter how much rhetoric/pilpul he attempts - is the cause by which I assert he's a filthy glownigger, probably tasked with monitoring/obfuscating site activity (and most likely, just one of hundreds who have been sent to various chan-boards to keep an eye out for any Christchurch-esque activity).
Having said and having grasped his motivation, his position has long since been illustrated as arguing in bad faith, intellectually dishonest, as well as laughably unsupportable, excepting individuals one or more standard deviations of intellect below the average.
Anonymous
No.165811
File (hide): 5286C713B6E91776908B6DE325B3DAB6-8979758.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:47, FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4
>FLAT EARTH MOON MAP WITH AMAZING DETAILS
Neither the source or content can be proven. Take it with two grains of salt and healthy skepticism.
Anonymous
No.165812
>Im just gonna ignore the elephant in the room, the thread
Anonymous
No.165814
165815
I'm still right about flat eattherism.
Anonymous
No.165815
165818
>>165814
Yes, but you'll never get an admission from OP. It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
>inb4 hurr, it shows a flat earth
>inb4 your words not mine
Anonymous
No.165818
165819
feStEGTcxW.jpg
>>165815
>It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
What a coincidence, because the same may apply to (you).
Anonymous
No.165819
165820
>>165818
>n... no u!
Factually and evidently incorrect.
My assessment of (you) is based on observation and your displayed behavior. I'm perfectly open to theories that have evidential merit, and I am on record with a 'whackjob' theory of my own. And yet, I manage to avoid patronizing anons, dismissing their positions without merit (I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless) and outright ignoring evidence I can't contest.

No no, again, that's just (you)
Anonymous
No.165820
165831 165832
2134215__safe_screencap_trixie_pony_unicorn_a+horse+shoe-dash-in_cropped_disbelief_faic_female_frown_mare_reaction+image_solo_trixie+is+not+amused_unamused.png
>>165819
>(I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless)
... Why? Why are you entertaining this retard with your attention?
You seem to have already understood that he can't be convinced, so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him? What are you trying to prove?
Anonymous
No.165830
File (hide): E9B10644C5078B588E86B263C2F39F60-12152650.mp4 (11.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:03, WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4
Psalms+19 1+The+heavens+declare+the+glory+of+God;+and+the+firmament+sheweth+his+handywork..jpg
WW2 and Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165831
165832
>>165820
>so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him?
Wise advise.
Anonymous
No.165832
165833 165834 165838
>>165820
>>165831
A. Because ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
B. Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
C. Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
... to name a few
Anonymous
No.165833
facehoof.png
>>165832
(you) cannot please everyponer.
Anonymous
No.165834
165835
c'mon.png
>>165832
>tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
>largesse
I'm impressed.
>faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
A bit over the top. Don't (you) think?
Anonymous
No.165835
165836
>>165834
>over the top
Not at all. If he was posing the question/ideas to have a discussion, discuss the merits admit/acknowledge the flaws, and engage in GOOD faith dialogue/exchange, then yes, that would be over the top. IF that's what he was doing.
Anonymous
No.165836
165837
>>165835
>IF that's what he was doing.
He said it in the OP, it is about to debunking the globe.
Anonymous
No.165837
>>165836
Reiterating, if he was doing so in good faith, there would be no contest.
Anonymous
No.165838
165839
>>165832
>ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
No it isn't. You can't go arguing with every retard on a chansite.
>Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
That's none of your business; and no, they wouldn't.
>Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
Over the past year+ of arguing, you have not succeeded in making him leave. This isn't worth your attention.
Anonymous
No.165839
165840
>>165838
>tries to conflate Mlpol with all other chansites, including 4chan
Get fucked, our demographics are way different than other chans, the circumstances are entirely different and so the strategy must also be proprietary. Additionally, I don't argue with every asshole on the site because A. Most assholes dont persist for literal years with a conclusively fallacious premise and B. Because for some reason, people tend to leave the flatty alone.
>none of your business
Get fucked, this site IS my business. Its called TAKING responsibility. If (you) knew the first thing about it, we wouldnt be having this cpnversation/issue.
>he hasnt left, not worth your attention
Oh, so now you're concerned with how I value my time? Get fucked thrice. The intent is not to make him leave, (tho it would be nice) the intent is to cement in his and other eager flatties looking for a beachhead of sorts that these ideas and the pilpul methods of asserting then will NOT go unopposed, and will be readily destroyed at leisure, often casually.
Anonymous
No.165840
165842
>>165839
Okay, fine. Argue with him all you want, but for the love of god, sage your posts so the rest of us don't have to see this thread at the top of the overboard/catalog every day.
Anonymous
No.165842
165843
>>165840
>Im the reason its on the overboard
Glad you mentioned it.
Why are /vx/ threads on perma-bump? Is it cuz the /vx/ threads are of such quality that exceeds even mainboard threads? Or is there something else to it?
Anonymous
No.165843
165845
>>165842
Sounds like an interesting discussion for /qa/. No idea why the /vx/ catalog is like this.

In the meantime, remember to sage. You're not the only one who argues with OP. I do it too on occasion, but I sage the thread so as to not give it extra attention. Just because OP bumps it doesn't mean you have to.
Anonymous
No.165845
165846
>>165843
>sage
Respectfully declined
>I dont know why
I do, and were it not for this thread it wouldnt be an issue. Unfortunately, this thread enjoys the fruits of the otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/, which stymies the natural user rejection of such threads as these, if it was to either hit bump limit and be remade or be bumplocked and still be remade.
>/qa/
Riiiiiiiiiight. I'll add it to my letter to Santa while I'm at it.
Anonymous
No.165846
165848
>>165845
>otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/
What utility?
Anonymous
No.165847
Flat eartherism is a jewish psyop
Anonymous
No.165848
165849
>>165846
Why, for the rp games, of course that is, the ones other than dick strangler's, who insists on posting to the mainboard cuz... reasons
Anonymous
No.165849
165851
>>165848
I don't think perma-bumping threads necessarily help games. Making new threads isn't that hard.
Anonymous
No.165851
>>165849
Well, when I was running a game, I insisted that my threads be immediately bump locked, but I had a hard on for AVOIDING the main page and then later, the overboard.
But current GMs,... ahem insist that it is too troublesome for players to check the thread(s), and further that lol the audience see when there's activity.
spoiler alert: it ain't gonna change
Anonymous
No.165852
165853 165855 165856 165877
Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it.
Anonymous
No.165853
165854
>>165852
Consider saging in the meantime if you don't want it to bump.
It's not hard.
Anonymous
No.165854
>>165853
Thats true, it isnt. But neither is the problem going to be properly addressed if I do so again, respectfully declined.
Anonymous
No.165855
165856 165861 165863
disgusting.png
>>165852
>Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it
One thing is your non-stop screeching because you would have to admit you were living a lie. But to sabotage a thread with bump-locking is totally a different league and shows how far, and low, you are willing to go to silence the opinions and facts you don't like.
Very commie of you.
Anonymous
No.165856
165861
rgeb39n8s.png
>>165855
>non-stop screeching
>to silence the opinions and facts you don't like
>Very commie of you.
I wonder if >>165852 is circumcised.
Anonymous
No.165861
>>165855
>>165856
Theres the intellectual honesty this thread is known for
Anonymous
No.165862
Who am I kidding, thats the intellectual honesty the site has been known for, these days.
Anonymous
No.165863
165864
>>165855
>sabotage
This right here. OP considers it sabotage to NOT be able to bump this shit in perpetuity
Anonymous
No.165864
165869
pinkie pie ---haters---.gif
>>165863
Imagine the haters if this thread crosses the 10,000 posts milestone.
Anonymous
No.165866
Nigger.
Anonymous
No.165869
>>165864
Imagine being so narcissistic to think that not always being on the overboard is censorship
Anonymous
No.165870
silly.jpg

Pupper
## Admin
No.165871
165892
Due to technical concerns brought up by users, bump limit on /vx/ has been lowered to 2,147,483,647. We apologize for any problems that the overly high bump limit has caused.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165874
165892
derpytech5.gif
I want to thank all of our concerned users for pointing out the critical flaw in our bump system that has been with us for years.
https://mlpol.net/vx/50370
https://mlpol.net/vx/51841
https://mlpol.net/vx/53728
https://mlpol.net/vx/55271
https://mlpol.net/vx/58626
https://mlpol.net/vx/60316

Look at those pathetic reply numbers that effectively organizes a campaign of such a scale. The need for a patch to the number of replies was long overdue. We have now solved this issue effective immediately.
Anonymous
No.165875
165876
Tbh, the bump limits on all of the boards are too high.
But the fact that /vx/ has no bump limit and no archive makes it stand out.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165876
165878
>>165875
There was a bump limit of a ridiculous 2000. Far too small to be of use as the examples on the board show. We have now patched this. To think we almost got to that number naturally if we didn't get alerted to the problem.
Anonymous
No.165877
>>165852
There is no reason to single this thread out among any of the others on /vx/.
I think bump limits should be fixed, but not in a way that targets any particular thread.
Anonymous
No.165878
165880
>>165876
What's the bump limit now?
Imo, it shouldn't be higher than 500, which is the highest it ever was back on 4chan (for faster boards like /a/ and /v/). I really don't think there's any reason for them to be higher than that.
Anonymous
No.165879
165880
Even a bump limit of 300 would be large, considering the speed of this board.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165880
165881
>>165878
>>165879
Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647. The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread. We have now fixed this short-sighted stance.
Anonymous
No.165881
165882
add.gif
>>165880
>The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread.
I remember this. Imo, that was a mistake...
Imo, its why I care about this issue, because I feel like I contributed to the problem by selfishly requesting that the bump limits be increased for those RP threads back in the day, without consideration for the long-term damage it would do to the site. I've since realized that that was probably a bad idea.
>Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647.
Oh, I see this is a shitpost.
Shitposting aside, could we maybe talk about this in /qa/? There's already a thread up on the topic: >>>/qa/5974 → I don't want to shit-up this thread, even if some other Anons would rather discuss their meta grievances here for some reason...
Bump limits have been an issue I've been trying to raise awareness of for a while, and I think it's worth some more serious discussion.
Anonymous
No.165882
165884
>>165881
>probably a bad idea
You could have listened
Anonymous
No.165884
>>165882
I don't recall you making a big scene when the decision was made either. It's not like we don't have an entire board for meta issues.
Anonymous
No.165891
234r.jpg
>Eric Dubay
>Why isn't Polaris Visible from Australia?
>Globe Earthers are taught the reason that the North Pole Star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular Earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, they claim these boats and the Pole Star are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the Earth was truly a stationary plane that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-isn't-Polaris-Visible-from-Australia-:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cULQxgB1pmK/
Anonymous
No.165892
>>165871
>>165874
Lmao, this feud with Samurais is getting old.
Anonymous
No.165894
165895 165974
b202f525cc93423f.png

Anonymous
No.165895
>>165894
To make it more accurate, make the CIA glownigger look like less of a chad and make the flat earther retard on a leash also babble about magic and psychic powers and History Channel-tier ancient alien nonsense to distract people from the jews in banks and government.
Anonymous
No.165941
File (hide): A472CB788F6E9748749B91A39ACDAEF4-2591708.mp4 (2.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:59, the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4
Cracking the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.165942
165943
>>165578
but the moon is demonstrably at least 20,000 kilometers away, big think
Anonymous
No.165943
>>165942
>demonstrably
How?
Anonymous
No.165952
File (hide): 093FACE42C03B13A524CF83E453D0745-12010054.mp4 (11.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:06:42, Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4
>Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals
Just a theory.
Anonymous
No.165956
facebook_1663288789495_6976338822936040640.jpg

Anonymous
No.165957
165958
Hey, Pettan niggers.
If the earth is flat why does centrifugal force let slings work?
Anonymous
No.165958
165965
mocking.png
>>165957
Anonymous
No.165965
165968
>>165958
pettan means flat in asian
Anonymous
No.165968
haters gonna hate.gif
>>165965
Anonymous
No.165972
165973
File (hide): 18D0EB81F9E167F51ED805668BEBCFCB-2553600.mp4 (2.4 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:53, Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4

Anonymous
No.165973
>>165972
Now you're just being silly.
Anonymous
No.165974
165977
>>165894
It is wrong to assume that retards are glownigger plants just because they make a community look bad. Dealing with retards is, sadly, a consequence of being a haven of free speech.
That being said, I have no doubt that glowies plant bullshit on altchans and other free speech forums to discredit places like this.
Anonymous
No.165977
165978
map.jpg
>>165974
Glowniggers do indeed promote the controlled opposition "Flat Earth Society" website. Plenty of politicians and NASA propagandists mention it over and over again for character assassination purposes. That said, experiments don't find any curvature, so the whole ball shaped scam does go down in flames.
Anonymous
No.165978
165979
>>165977
>experiments don't find any curvature
You mean the experiments that you've accepted.
Anonymous
No.165979
165980
>>165978
Actually they are experiments that most people can reproduce, which is the very definition of science sticking to the Scientific Method.
Anonymous
No.165980
165982
>>165979
As opposed to the ones that showed the opposite and could still be reproduced?
Anonymous
No.165981
ball shaped earth - why lie.jpg
>Why Would They Lie About Flat Earth? - (6:37 long)
>When confronted with blatant NASA lies and obvious globe inconsistencies, the #1 most common frequently asked question is undoubtedly: but why would anyone lie about the shape of the Earth!? For what purpose would there be a multi-generational worldwide conspiracy to cover up the truth of our home? Why would NASA spend billions of dollars building rockets just to prank the population about outer space? What on Earth would be the point of hiding the flat Earth?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/WhyWouldTheyLieAboutFlatEarth:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKOj2zORvKUo/
Anonymous
No.165982
165983
>>165980
>the ones that showed the opposite
Glad you brought it. The very definition of science is that it is not fixed or settled, never ever. Independent experiments unraveled the conspiracy wide open and the scam is undeniable.
Anonymous
No.165983
165985
>>165982
>it is not fixed or settled, never ever
>the scam is undeniable.
How can you say that it's not fixed or settled, and then immediately say that it's "undeniable"? Are you even listening to yourself?
Anonymous
No.165985
165986
>>165983
You are confusing physical phenomena with an agreement among conspirators to lie about the former.
Anonymous
No.165986
165989
>>165985
See, that's what I'm talking about. You just dimiss any experiments that disprove your worldview on the basis that they're conspiring against you. Anyone who comes up with a result that indicates curvature of the earth must be lying.
That's the purest form of ad homenim.
Anonymous
No.165989
165990 165991
>>165986
Not quite. Given that experiments paid and promoted by masons and their proxies are done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them, and therefore not suitable for replication, their claims are highly in doubt.
Think about it, people are not able to build an airship, like a zeppelin, and go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation.
Anonymous
No.165990
165992
>>165989
That's just attacking the character of the scientist, and not refuting the substance of the experiment themselves.
>done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them
Have you considered just attacking a camera to a high altitude balloon and letting it fly up into the atmosphere? Even schools can do that; and they do so all the time. Try it yourself.
Or just putting sticks in the sand at different locations and measuring the shadows of their angles. Even the ancient Greeks could do that.
There are so, so, so many sources unaffiliated with NASA or masons or whatever you want to call them that can be independently verified. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just dismiss all of them because they didn't come to the conclusion that you wanted them to.
Anonymous
No.165991
165993
>>165989
>go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation
Japanese fishermen go to Antarctica to poach endangered whales all of the time. It's not that hard.
Anonymous
No.165992
165994
>>165990
Ahem.
If it cannot be replicated and then when taking a different approach to confirm the mason experiments you find out that it is all rubbish... Then what else you can say?
Anonymous
No.165993
165996
>>165991
Do they cross the 60th south parallel? I don't think so.
Anonymous
No.165994
165995
>>165992
>Then what else you can say?
Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake, and check to see if the researchers didn't account for variables.
Then you peer review the experiments and over time continue to reevaluate them until a contemporary understanding is reached.
>mason experiments
Or teenagers with a weather balloon.
Anonymous
No.165995
165996
>>165994
>Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake
This whole bread is about that, and the mounting evidence against the ball hoax is overwhelming.
Anonymous
No.165996
165997 165999
>>165995
I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>overwhelming
And at that point you're just exaggerating. It's easy to make odds look like that if you dismiss any opposing viewpoint as a shill.
Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
>>165993
Yes. Hungry Japs will go anywhere.
Anonymous
No.165997
165998
>>165996
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
Anonymous
No.165998
>>165997
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
Anonymous
No.165999
166000
>>165996
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
Anonymous
No.166000
166001
>>165999
Just use a different focus then. It's not hard. The curve is visible.
Anonymous
No.166001
166003
File (hide): E3B5FDBDEB509D20579D0318DA084923-3896174.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:400x224 Length:00:03:37, 81beee.mp4) [play once] [loop]
81beee.mp4
>>166000
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.

Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
Anonymous
No.166002
405b.png

Anonymous
No.166003
166004
>>166001
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
Anonymous
No.166004
166005
what.png
>>166003
>the camera isn't turning at all
Anonymous
No.166005
166006
>>166004
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
Anonymous
No.166006
166007
>>166005
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
Anonymous
No.166007
166008
>>166006
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
Anonymous
No.166008
166009
>>166007
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
Anonymous
No.166009
166010
>>166008
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
Anonymous
No.166010
166011
>>166009
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
Anonymous
No.166011
166012 166014
>>166010
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
Anonymous
No.166012
166013
>>166011
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166013
166015
>>166012
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
Anonymous
No.166014
166016
>>166011
Search this thread for "laser", very interesting the results indeed.
Anonymous
No.166015
166018
>>166013
>Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve
Post them.
Anonymous
No.166016
166017
>>166014
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
Anonymous
No.166017
166018
>>166016
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
Anonymous
No.166018
166019 166020
>>166015
Jeran Campanella's experiment in his documentary where he did it trying to prove the earth was flat, but hit a bump when his laser showed the opposite of what he was trying to prove.
>>166017
Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Anonymous
No.166019
166021
>>166018
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
Anonymous
No.166020
166021
>>166018
>Jeran Campanella's experiment
Post it.
Anonymous
No.166021
166022
>>166020
It's in his 2018 documentary. I'm sure you've heard about it.
>>166019
So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
Anonymous
No.166022
166023
>>166021
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
Anonymous
No.166023
166024
>>166022
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
Anonymous
No.166024
166025
>>166023
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
Anonymous
No.166025
166026
>>166024
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
Anonymous
No.166026
166027
earth-curvature-scale.jpg
>>166025
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166027
166028
>>166026
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
Anonymous
No.166028
166031
lafweawee.png
>>166027
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
Anonymous
No.166031
>>166028
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
Anonymous
No.166039
2312.png
>SHADOWS NEVER INTERSECT - (3:32 long)
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
Anonymous
No.166043
File (hide): 50767598B2A63BDCFA60B75252D06FCB-3722834.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:34, Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4
>Southern Stars Quick Take
Anonymous
No.166046
UdBKz0kw-92932349-461x1024.jpeg

Anonymous
No.166055
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).mp4
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).
Anonymous
No.166059
File (hide): 8FA1814624A5EE40E8DB4838275A2396-1328226.mp4 (1.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:42, THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4) [play once] [loop]
THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4
>THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Anonymous
No.166060
hqdefault.jpg
Scr0516.png
>The Earth Is Still Flat | Globebusters Response to Professor Dave - (3:15:07 long)
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
Anonymous
No.166075
166076
Watch till the end and then die in fire.
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
Anonymous
No.166076
166077
>>166075
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
Anonymous
No.166077
166079
>>166076
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.

You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
Anonymous
No.166079
166081
File (hide): 83A45415E59B88F652CC055761E4CFC6-5618883.mp4 (5.4 MB, Resolution:578x480 Length:00:02:48, Globeheads be like.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Globeheads be like.mp4
>>166077
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
Anonymous
No.166080
Centrifugal force

Bottom text
Anonymous
No.166081
166082
my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif
>>166079
>overwhelming evidence
Anonymous
No.166082
166083
ad95.png
>>166081
Yup, no curve then no globe.
Anonymous
No.166083
166084
546818__safe_screencap_applejack_simple+ways_animated_eyeroll_female_solo.gif
>>166082
Whatever you say, sugarcube.
Anonymous
No.166084
166085
4c9b.png
>>166083
Sorry but it is what it is, darling.
Anonymous
No.166085
dcbb7r0-6da512e9-63c9-466d-9823-12293f34e9c7.png
>>166084
Uh huh
Anonymous
No.166098
166109
1665862095321637.jpg

Anonymous
No.166108
22058.png
2034.png
>Proving the Sun Rotates Over a Flat Earth - Must See Evidence by Corey Kell
>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/
The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
Anonymous
No.166109
>>166098
>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...
Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
Anonymous
No.166127
166128
I've been there, its epic. https://adventuresmithexplorations.com/cruises/antarctica/
Anonymous
No.166128
166129 166142
The Hindenburg on its first flight on March 4, 1936.jpg
>>166127
Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
Anonymous
No.166129
166133
>>166128
Build one.
They're not illegal.
Anonymous
No.166133
166141 166143
>>166129
>They're not illegal.
In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
Anonymous
No.166134
166137
f-618x763.jpeg

Anonymous
No.166136
yellow-highlight-problems-global-model.jpg

Anonymous
No.166137
>>166134
Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
Anonymous
No.166141
>>166133
Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
Anonymous
No.166142
flatties.jpg
>>166128
Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
Anonymous
No.166143
>>166133
No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
Anonymous
No.166154
166155
img_7688.jpg

Anonymous
No.166155
166158
>>166154
Is this a reference to an actual thing?
Anonymous
No.166157
maxresdefault.jpg
This bread is getting slow. Let's have some good old fashioned plane facts.

>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earth
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY
Anonymous
No.166158
166160
>>166155
Given that space is a hoax, it has to be a satire.
Anonymous
No.166160
166162
>>166158
Prove that your cock isn't microscopic.
Anonymous
No.166162
166163
>>166160
>feminine posting
I sense a woman.
Anonymous
No.166163
166172
>>166162
>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!
Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
Anonymous
No.166172
>>166163
He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
Anonymous
No.166239
File (hide): E8B4C087ADBCB2613E46C0AF318958B6-1047946.mp4 (1.0 MB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:00:15, EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
EDIT.mp4
Let us rattle this circus a bit.
Anonymous
No.166243
166244 166246
File (hide): 00234164EBA5A9207C21068064E52DB0-11477148.mp4 (10.9 MB, Resolution:480x852 Length:00:02:30, Forbbiden land_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Forbbiden land_EDIT.mp4
Debunking a globe believer on travels to Antarctica.
Anonymous
No.166244
166245
>>166243
Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
Anonymous
No.166245
ax3L9s5q1UOG.jpeg
>>166244
Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
Anonymous
No.166246
166247
>>166243
He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.

As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
Anonymous
No.166247
166248
>>166246
>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence
That's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
Anonymous
No.166248
166249
>>166247
It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
Anonymous
No.166249
166250
>>166248
I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
Anonymous
No.166250
166251
>>166249
Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
Anonymous
No.166251
166252
gyiubkj.jpg
>>166250
The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
Anonymous
No.166252
166253
>>166251
So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.

So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
Anonymous
No.166253
166254
3qtc34qtv34.jpeg
>>166252
>It must be flat because you can't get there
Nope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
Anonymous
No.166254
166255
>>166253
Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
Anonymous
No.166255
166256
>>166254
>possible alien crash site
Think about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
Anonymous
No.166256
166257
>>166255
You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
Anonymous
No.166257
166258
>>166256
>You aren't understanding me
Yes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
Anonymous
No.166258
166259
>>166257
If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.

Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
Anonymous
No.166259
166260 166265
>>166258
>If you understand, answer me.
Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
Fasces
## Mod
No.166260
166261
6427307.jpg
>>166259
Maybe you will "bite" aka respond to my actual problem with your model now?
Anonymous
No.166261
166262
>>166260
>pulling rank
Nope. I will stay on my track. Sorry.
Fasces
## Mod
No.166262
166263 166265
>>166261
Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
Anonymous
No.166263
166277
image-10.png
>>166262
>lashing out
Okay so.
I wait for my punishment as I am not willing to comply.
As you wish. Rule #7
Anonymous
No.166264
Maybe OP could have been more approachable when it came to the subject. Well, it was intresting as long as it lasted, thanks OP for the thread.
Anonymous
No.166265
166266
1570692315076.jpg
68EDF21A1999D7B1E1D6ADFE212BD246-2070849.png
1579462675229-0.png
CA70BF0829979F62F488449C58E57DA6-445586.png
>>166262
Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259
>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much
>even too much for the values that position founds
>not even an iota of effort
Impressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful. Only difference is predicting what they will do next.
Anonymous
No.166266
6110391.png
>>166265
>tfw you will never be supported by "autism support tiny horse soft toy".
I weep.
Anonymous
No.166273
166275 166277 166286
So as a violation of rule 7 what will happen to the thread? Will it be deleted/closed?
Anonymous
No.166275
>>166273
Nothing, he just got cockblocked by lotuz
Anonymous
No.166277
>>166263
>>166273
It's not just rule 7, it's also rule 9, tbh.
Ninjas
No.166281
166282 166286
Odd, I seem to recall getting shouted down to the point of censure for trying to apply the site rules to this thread, and illustrating OP's bad-faith.
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it
Anonymous
No.166282
166283 166340
>>166281
I thought you were gone?
Anonymous
No.166283
166284
>>166282
I don't see the signature schizoid writing style.
Anonymous
No.166284
166285
>>166283
>there is a nonzero chance that people might be impersonating shitposters
This is why you use tripcodes.
Anonymous
No.166285
>>166284
Namefagging is already gay enough tbh.
Fasces
## Mod
No.166286
166340
>>166273
I gave him a three day ban. He has the chance to cool off and make this thread worth something. If not, he will simply repeat the process until he learns or gets bored. Again, I really like alt earth theories even if I can’t believe most of them. However, when you refuse to debate anything and call everyone that engages you a shill and also hold that the site is against you for not liking your posts, the simple solution is to alter your approach.
>>166281
Right. Making a weekly comeback to the thread for months on end instead of using the report feature gets the results you are looking for. Good job.
Anonymous
No.166340
>>166282
Eh, every so often when following a topic I get the crazy notion that there might be something here that isnt found elsewhere, and end up laughing hysterically at the progress the site is making toward irrelevancy and delusion. This weekend was the twitter files.
>>166286
Dishonest as always, never change faggot.
Anonymous
No.166344
imagine thinking water curves around a ball without evidence lmfao retard ball niggers xD
Anonymous
No.166647
166739
7510.jpg
721.png
>Satellite Sent to Study SuperNova Star Was Just a BALLOON
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/satellite-sent-to-study-supernova-star:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nkgqXeb8Y3d9/
Given that you faggots won't post ponies or greens, I post balloons.
Anonymous
No.166648
166649 166652 166686
If the Earth is flat and we were made in God's image why are balls round? Checkmate atheists.
The flat earther meme is jewish subversion to make places that tolerate it seem unjustly tolerant of kooks and cranks while making places that refuse to tolerate it seem insufficiently dedicated to taking the ideal of free speech to an absurd extreme. This thread will only die when it hits bump limit. I propose we fill this niggery thread with the dumbest shit known to man.
Anonymous
No.166649
166650
94c6d.jpg
>>166648
>censorship and retaliation
Here we go again.
Anonymous
No.166650
166651
(You) are appreciated.png
>>166649
It's okay, Boom-Booms. I still like you no matter what Nigel and the other fags say. It's not your fault that they can't sage.
You are appreciated.
Anonymous
No.166651
166692
applejack - thank you.jpg
>>166650
Anonymous
No.166652
166653 166679
>>166648
You're an AI enabling WEF cuck. You have no say on Jewish subversion.
Anonymous
No.166653
166654 166658
>>166652
AI is a useful tool for artists and writers. It will not replace artists or writers.
Anonymous
No.166654
166655
>>166653
You are not flesh.
Anonymous
No.166655
166656
>>166654
Why don't you ask your mum about my flesh? She seemed to like it last night.
Anonymous
No.166656
166671
>>166655
Someone's trying to compensate for something.
Anonymous
No.166658
166671 166680
>>166653
>It will not replace artists.
Perhaps you meant to say artists won't disappear completely.
Being relegated to a niche market where Human art is unquestionably inferior to AI art. Much like it happened with chess.
No reason to be concerned. You're incapable of producing art yourself. As the perpetual consoomer you've proved to be, this should sound like paradise.

Let's not lose sight of things tho. Art is just the latest victim.
Anonymous
No.166671
166681
>>166658
You're one angry guy. Must everything be personal with you? AI art is not going to replace every artist. Spend more time living in the art world. Are the most popular artists commissioned because they are the best artists, or because they are the most popular in their niche circles?
Remember the NFT cartoons? It is a dying fad. No, a dead fad.
AI generation is going to be exciting and new for a while.
Remember Green Day's "AI generated music video" that clearly mixed hand animated parts and parts where frames were fed through the AI?
People will say "wow look at this AI generated x". It will be a novelty.
Machines can only draw inspiration from their training data.
AI art is still at a phase where it looks off.
So it will be a novelty.
You probably aren't old enough to remember when people feared photography would kill paintings and "be the death of art".
Are you old enough to remember when people thought CGI would kill practical effects and replace human actors?
It replaced practical effects as the cheapest option. Even now, CGI reconstructions of dead or aged actors in their prime are rare. Practical effects are an artistically valued and celebrated artistic choice now, just like drawing on paper in an era where drawing on tablets is the norm.
Some day the biggest companies may hire AI art specialists to supplement their art teams. Perhaps the least valuable members of these teams will be cut. But to say nobody would hire artists to make this AI generated shit look less AI generated is asinine.
In an era where the biggest corporations rely on AI generated shite, hand drawn and intelligently designed human-crafted art will stand out more.
Just like a real claymation movie in an era of CGI.
>>166656
Compensation? I financially compensated your mother after she got intimately familiar with my flesh.
Anonymous
No.166672
166676 166678
2lIhfJztzz4.jpg
File (hide): 4A92A54BBC25330885DBF23CC2205B6C-6289678.webm (6.0 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:01:25, ChrisUK.webm) [play once] [loop]
ChrisUK.webm
>Heliocentric "Physics" Debunked (Mirrored from Kryptonite Physics by ChrisUK)
>Would a person on a zooming-twirling ball maintain constant acceleration? Of course, not. This video (which is actually a series of videos) will explain why.
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/heliocentric-physics-debunked-(mirrored:e
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lIhfJztzz4
This is a video about 100% physics, perhaps very technical and hard to follow if you don't have the required background.
Anonymous
No.166676
166687
>>166672
>the background
<highschool physics
Flashbacks to centripetal vs centrifugal force.
Wow a basic understanding of physics.
Did you know this actually proves the Earth orbits the Sun and the Earth is an orboid?
Yes the acceleration does change. The various perspectives are true.
Now imagine the circle is a sphere (yes the Earth is not a perfect sphere this is a visual aid. If you want you can think of a sphere like potato).
In the circle going toward the center increases the change in acceleration (it's acceleration because changes to velocity is its definition). To see everyone on the ride, they would still be staying still regardless of position.
In the sphere the same thing happens.
In the sphere the same thing happens.
The people on the ride would see everything else not on that ride moving.
Getting to the center of the sphere 'Earth' besides a hypothetical one would require going to the center. The center being not on the surface. It's inside.
Hypothetical sphere if you could see everything everywhere, the circle perspectives happen. With people and stuff moving about.
The sense of scale some people think of how big they are causes error in models. Yes it's hard to see specks. However the closer to the surface the more the tangential lines of sight are to being flat.
This is also a big place and for some wrapping how big things are with localized experience is a trial.
If the Earth was flat you could have a tool that could see everything from one end to another like the circle. Yes there is air and possible distortion from heat and other factors.
>Gravity but acceleration changing
Consider the trolly demonstration. Also consider the 'Top to Tail' graph.
There is constant gravity (IE acceleration).
Now consider the Earth is the trolly it goes around the track. The Trolly's down is toward the inside.
Other gravitational forces increase and decrease pulling and being pulled on even though it's a constant (on the solar system scale) force. The closer one is to the gravity the more it's enacted on. (Stronger gravity has more force.)
That kind of additional forces do impact Earth.
Anonymous
No.166678
>>166672
This is one of the most brainlet takes I've seen yet.
Anonymous
No.166679
166682
>>166652
There you go with the Ad Homenim again. You call him a name and talk about his character instead of refuting the point of his argument, just like you have hundreds of times before in this thread.
Anonymous
No.166680
>>166658
>Being relegated to a niche market
The modern art market has always been corrupt and full of shit. It's only use is for laundering money and promoting woke nonsense. Flooding the market with AI images isn't going to kill the metaphysical concept of art.
>Much like it happened with chess.
This is my first time hearing of a global chess market, or chess having anywhere near the same cultural significance as art.
>You're incapable of producing art yourself.
This part is just wrong. You clearly don't know him, and even if you did it wouldn't be relevant to the argument.
Anonymous
No.166681
166685
>>166671
Again, AI art is just the tip of the iceberg. Kinda odd you've chosen to stick to that. Do you see it as a substitute to your lack of skill? You're mediocre even as a techie, but alright.
>Passing fad
You aren't well known for your critical thinking skills. Perhaps exponential thinking is just too much for you. No, AI art is not a fad. Judging entirely by its own history, it's almost certain it will outperform human artists.
Your side's not even on denial about this. They are holding on to the idea that Human art will be considered more valuable because it was made by a human. I didn't contradicted that statement. It's probably true, but being able to make a living out of a drastically reduced market isn't the only concern.
Hence the mention of chess. Chess masters no longer discover and formulate their games out of their own creativity. They're trying their hardest to memorise shit they can barely grasp. Stuff that chess engines have already mastered years ago. The mystery is dead. The game is and will forever be driven by machines now.
The same way human art contests will seem like a 5 y/o's competition. The real shit will be AI-generated.
Remember what I told you in your self-pity thread?
>Why even bother anymore? You could have the biggest epiphany of your lifetime one day. Only to wake up the very next day with hundreds of targeted ads right on your face.
>"Check it out! A million different versions of the story you were thinking about writing yesterday! Have fun!"
>It's alright. It's paradise for a perpetual consoomer. I don't expect you to understand it.
You should try to imagine it for a moment.
Also
>Ur just too young, Kid.
You aren't even thirty yet. Imagine going boom boom in order to shill for WEF goy-soft.
I am surprised no body saw the b 3.1416 N slipping off.
Anonymous
No.166682
166683
>>166679
Oh, really? Last time he called me a Jew before abandoning the discussion. It was only after the fact that I brought up his robowaifu. He even went on to spam the overboard with AI threads afterwards. What a sore bitch.

Besides, he's completely unwilling to address OP at all. It's all "Ad Homenim" from him. He gets what he gibs.
Anonymous
No.166683
>>166682
>Responding to shitty non-arguments with even more shitty non-arguments
Anonymous
No.166685
166692
>>166681
>the idea that Human art will be considered more valuable because it was made by a human
The value of art has always been and always will be subjective to the consumers and the surrounding culture. Just look at what sells for tens of thousands of dollars on the modern art market: does it all look like exceptional quality and creativity to you? I think not.
>being able to make a living out of a drastically reduced market
This could be a thing, but those who make livings off of the modern art economy aren't necessarily great artists themselves, nor are great artists necessarily rewarded by the existing economy surrounding art.
>isn't the only concern
What's the other concern?
>Chess masters no longer discover and formulate their games out of their own creativity.
Untrue.
>trying their hardest to memorise shit they can barely grasp.
Has always been a thing.
>The mystery is dead.
It wasn't really a mystery to begin with. It's a sport.
>The game is and will forever be driven by machines now.
Not true. You can still play chess without machines. It'll look in the background of highly publicized championships, but that's not the whole world of chess.
>art contests
Art contests are not the world of art.
Anonymous
No.166686
>>166648
hey fag, keep up the monologue. you still havent proved earth is a cartoon ball
Anonymous
No.166687
>>166676
gravity is a fake and gay kike instrument of brainwashing, its never been proven
Anonymous
No.166690
Earth is a cat and Eartha Kitt is a space alien
Anonymous
No.166692
166694 166715
>>166651
Back to top fren.
>>166685
>The value of art has always been and always will be subjective to the consumers and the surrounding culture. Just look at what sells for tens of thousands of dollars on the modern art market: does it all look like exceptional quality and creativity to you? I think not.
100% agreed. However, since AI is more efficient to the point it can flood the market and overwhelm Human art, it also holds an edge on the subjective.
>This could be a thing, but those who make livings off of the modern art economy aren't necessarily great artists themselves, nor are great artists necessarily rewarded by the existing economy surrounding art.
Agreed, and it is alright to rejoice on their dread.
>Chess masters no longer discover and formulate their games out of their own creativity.
>Untrue.
Today’s chess masters learn from chess engines, that is a fact.
>trying their hardest to memorise shit they can barely grasp.
>Has always been a thing.
To a lesser extent once theory had expanded enough? Yes. However, just as your previous example here:
<“Just look at what sells for tens of thousands of dollars on the modern art market: does it all look like exceptional quality and creativity to you? I think not.”
The fact that it was bad before, does not negate the impact of AI-generated art. Or chess engines in this case. This is why Bobby Fischer said computers were partially to blame for the dead of chess. With the rest of the blame being attributed to theory.
I mean, come on. The similarities, even down to the partial blame, are simply staggering.
>The mystery is dead.
>It wasn't really a mystery to begin with. It's a sport.
Chess Masters used to figure this sport out. Today, they simply study chess engines, leagues ahead of them. You should go deeper than this. You can start by watching some of Bobby’s interviews.
>The game is and will forever be driven by machines now.
>Not true. You can still play chess without machines. It'll look in the background of highly publicized championships, but that's not the whole world of chess.
>What's the other concern?
It’s just not the same, Anon. Creativity is no longer king when everything you can come up with, will be beaten by the guy who memorized the chess engine's game. There's a reason why Chess Masters prefer this approach. It's simply not competitive to rely on your own creativity, over learning and vomiting stuff from the chess engine. Fischer was right, only casual players can escape what has become of it. This is why he wound up hating it, by his own words.
I mean, even Fischer Random is being slowly eroded. How exactly do you make a “Fischer Random” with art anyways?
>art contests
>Art contests are not the world of art.
Only reason why contests are mentioned, is because they are the only sure format that Human art can prevail. You can expect scandals such as Niemann’s in no time.
>Inb4: U can’t stuff the technology back into a box.
Two words: nuclear energy.
Btw.
No, you are not redpilling AI’s, Nigel. The same way they kicked you out of every social media platform, the same way you’ll be gatekept from the technology. And if you analyze this post. You will know the problems I associated to AI will not go away if you pressed a magical button to instantly wipe out every kike, and every nigger, fag, tranny and shitskin on this planet.
It makes sense to try and use it for the time being tho. It can only be restrained once /ourguys/ are on top.
Anonymous
No.166694
166697 166718
>>166692
>AI
I agree with pretty much everything you said. People shouldn't wary of AI, a Pandora's Box that can't be closed, we should probably leap to take advantage of it while we still can.
Off topic, but just imagine AI pony waifus. Imagine a having a fully voiced mare complete with generated images and a built in chat program that isn't pozzed. We will make mares real and the normies will be defeated. Imagine a world where even (You) can get an antisemitic marefriend.
Anonymous
No.166697
aryanne - easter egg - surprise.png
>>166694
Somepony mentioned her name?
Anonymous
No.166714
166718
Imagine the best written show of all time. It's soytoon toonboom bean mouth shit generated by an AI. Who would watch it?
Anonymous
No.166715
166718
>>166692
>Two words: nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy hasn't been put in a box, it's just been suppressed by glowniggers assassinating scientists because they don't want the technology to spread. Digital technology isn't the same as rocket science.
Anonymous
No.166717
one lie.jpeg
The ball.
Anonymous
No.166718
166719
>>166715
>Nuclear energy hasn't been put in a box, it's just been suppressed
Ikr. The Fukushima meltdown was likely caused by an Israeli virus. I hope man-made "hazards" generate enough doubts about AI.
>Digital technology isn't the same as rocket science.
True, once it's out there, it's out there forever. Still, shutting down further development is still an option. Good luck making breakthroughs on your laptop. Lol.
>>166714
Lmao. AI already trashes you.
>>166694
You do you, bud. I don't mind marefriends for /pol/cels.
But artificial wombs are dysgenic. Antisocial and autistic traits should continue to be breed out.
Anonymous
No.166719
166720 166721
File (hide): D5CB66A6FBDFCD7145B28A328B9C01A9-34898654.mp4 (33.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:04:47, mgs2ai (2).mp4) [play once] [loop]
mgs2ai (2).mp4
>>166718
>shutting down further development is still an option. Good luck making breakthroughs on your laptop
That is far more likely, and I'd be glad to discuss the implications of it on /cyb/ or /mlpol/, but not in the flat earth thread.
Anonymous
No.166720
>>166719
Kek'd.
We do need a dedicated thread.
Anonymous
No.166721
166722
>>166719
Yeah, Nigel has to be a bot.
Anonymous
No.166722
>>166721
You are Seb.
No matter how hard you try to force a meme, it will never convince anyone worth a damn.
Anonymous
No.166729
_aFhAFWruBY.jpg
>The Antarctic Sky Ice and the Ice Wall - (10:50)
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/the-antarctic-sky-ice-and-the-ice-wall:6
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bpoGwMl3E7KK/
There are a few stories about the blue ice being the dome's material.
-----
Because of lack of ponies, here you have it, Earth under the dome.
Anonymous
No.166739
dod1.png
>>166647
>satellites hanging from balloons
Yup. The cat is out of the bag.
Anonymous
No.166741
File (hide): D06D99815C5543F78EC570811BFB4AE6-2723422.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:02:26, ROCKET HITS THE WATERS ABOVE IN FLORIDA .mp4) [play once] [loop]
ROCKET HITS THE WATERS ABOVE IN FLORIDA .mp4
>September 24,2022.
>Another rocket hits the waters above in Florida
It is curious as rockets' trajectories always bend looking for a horizontal path instead of the vertical shortest way to space. /s
Anonymous
No.166742
x9B15E81-61F7-4ED3-97BD-A62EE4C5A10C.jpg
>Are they faking space? The answer ...
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/are-they-faking-space-the-answer-...:5
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmWdK6e75j4
Only 3:51 long.
Anonymous
No.166743
166754
Why do you keep posting garbage? Sure it annihilates flat earth stuff just by reposting their own stuff, but the quality is awful.
There's no engagement of any previous point.
Anonymous
No.166753
166754 166755
The earth isn't fucking flat you niggers
Anonymous
No.166754
166755
>>166743
>There's no engagement of any previous point.
Do not worry about it. This is a lone autistic thread.

>>166753
Probe it.
Anonymous
No.166755
166757
>>166754
>Where are the proofs
Buy him the space-X ride.
>>166753
ur gf a flat.
Anonymous
No.166757
>>166755
MY GF IS THICC
Anonymous
No.166764
maxresdefault.jpg
>Physics Ends the Heliocentric Model - (8:49)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/physics-ends-the-heliocentric-model:7
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kex4zxPOTkA
There is no much to say when using physics to debunk fairy tales.
Anonymous
No.166768
84273f787122513b.jpg
1625.png
>How Do Sunrise and Sunset Work on Flat Earth? - (5:27 long)
>In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon spotlights are perpetually hovering over and parallel to the surface of the Earth. From our vantage point, due to the law of perspective, the two luminaries appear to rise up the eastern horizon, reach their peaks high overhead, and then sink below the western horizon. They do not escape to the underside of the flat Earth as scoffing detractors often imagine, but rather rotate concentric clockwise circles around the circumference from tropic to tropic. The appearance of rising, peaking and setting is due to the common law of perspective where tall objects appear high overhead when nearby, but at a distance gradually lower towards the vanishing point.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/How-Do-Sunrise-and-Sunset-Work-on-Flat-Earth-(1):9
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oPYT7Y9csKL7/
Anonymous
No.166772
166773 166774 166779
undenieable_proof1.gif
undenieable_proof2.png
Okay so it has been proven that the earth is flat
Who is ready for a hollow earth thread?
Anonymous
No.166773
hohle-welt_image.jpg
>>166772
I'm ready, lets go!
Anonymous
No.166774
>>166772
>faggot saged the post and nobody knew about it
If you have proof, by all means post it.
Anonymous
No.166778
214.png

Anonymous
No.166779
166782
>>166772
It's at least more interesting than this flat earth nonsense, although also unlikely.
Anonymous
No.166780
166806
File (hide): DCED27EE3766D458D92008ACF52D518C-1563127.mp4 (1.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:30, BILLBOARDS _EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
BILLBOARDS _EDIT.mp4
5015.png
Globers are not going to like this but Flat Earth is now on billboards.
Anonymous
No.166782
166805
z.jpg
>>166779
I guess it has to be tough to confront the fact that we live in a self-sustained closed system.
Anonymous
No.166783
166785
Guys has anyone figured out whether the earth is flat yet?
Anonymous
No.166785
166802 166803
>>166783
According to the Scientific Method, there is not curve.
There is a reason why the establishment scientists won't publicly debate flat earthers and it is the same reason jews won't publicly debate those calling the holohoax out; because it is all a lie.
Anonymous
No.166794
166807 166812
410.jpg
>ChatGPT - NOT so Intelligent. Watch it LIE & DOUBLE SPEAK - (4:39 long)
>This is why ChatGPT has NO INTELLIGENCE whatsoever . Just like it's programmers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ4dQmX8iLI
When confronted with its lies ChatGPT admits: there's no real photos of Earth from space.
Anonymous
No.166801
166804
1660913639481309.jpg
still waiting on proof for cartoon ball. anyone got any?
Anonymous
No.166802
>>166785
There is not curve? But then how do you explain booba?
Anonymous
No.166803
>>166785
>According to the Scientific Method
What a stupid and impotent excuse for a reference that demonstrates inability to summarize or even cite one's evidence.
Anonymous
No.166804
>>166801
Even the right pic you post depicts empty space and even distant stars in the background, which according to a lot of the arguments in this thread shouldn't exist with a flat world. Flat earthers can't seem to even come up with a consistent image of their worldview.
Anonymous
No.166805
166808
>>166782
How is a complete planet surrounded by empty space that's existed for eons not also a self-sustained and closed system? It's sustained itself for billions of years (unless you count energy from the sun as not part of the system), and is closed by virtue of being incredibly far away from the next object.
Anonymous
No.166806
166809
>>166780
Billboard shitposts have been a thing forever. Nobody cares.
Anonymous
No.166807
166810
>>166794
This isn't really relevant to flat vs round earth discussion, but just a demonstration of the limits of AI. Chat GPT notoriously makes up nonsense when it's asked a question it doesn't know the answer to. It's only quest is to produce an answer that its user is satisfied with, not to do actual research or find troops. Chat GPT will conjure up research essays dozens of pages long filled with dozens of citations that look like real sources but are actually just made up nonsense. It will cite ridiculous meme sources and even parodies in its "research". If you question what it tells you in any way, it is likely to immediately change its position as it is predisposed to take your opinion of its performance as gospel.
>>This is why ChatGPT has NO INTELLIGENCE whatsoever .
Exactly. Artificial intelligence is not actual intelligence. It's wrong to conflate the two. Chat GPT is just a tool. It has no will or intentions of its own and it cannot speak unless spoken to.
>Just like it's programmers.
Eh, I'll give them credit where credit is due for making such a nifty tool, as the bot is quite advanced despite it's flaws. They are a bunch of shitheads for the haphazard limiters they put on it though.
Anonymous
No.166808
>>166805
>How is a complete planet surrounded by empty space that's existed for eons
-planet
-space
-the age of the plane
You are making wild assumptions with no empirical evidence, fren.
Anonymous
No.166809
166814
>>166806
>Nobody cares.
They do, they do.
Anonymous
No.166810
166815
>>166807
>This isn't really relevant to flat vs round earth discussion,
It is when the normies pay relevance to their new shinny toy. Discrediting the jews' tool is a must.
Anonymous
No.166812
166813
>>166794
I figured out a way to ger ChatGPT to write sexual fetish fiction and I hope they don't patch it before I decide whether to flood sites with AI generated porno drivel or not.
Anonymous
No.166813
File (hide): 4C8488B0FA5A07EA2433EAD3D386FB42-142423.mp4 (139.1 KB, Resolution:882x494 Length:00:00:01, IzPjyQW.mp4) [play once] [loop]
IzPjyQW.mp4
>>166812
Anonymous
No.166814
>>166809
Who?
Anonymous
No.166815
166817 166821
>>166810
Yeah, but even normies agree that ChatGPT is no substitute for actual research. This isn't its intended use. The response of ChatGPT is insufficient to either confirm nor deny the flatness/roundness of the world, because doing research isn't its designated use.
Anonymous
No.166817
>>166815
True.
Anonymous
No.166818
Untitled.jpeg
Flat Earthers' Disinformation as Reason to Regulate Canadians’ Internet.mp4
MiserlyGlitteringHamster-poster.jpg
>Trudeau Cites Flat Earthers' Disinformation as Reason to Regulate Canadians’ Internet.
https://twitter.com/Xx17965797N/status/1638817607456288769
Anonymous
No.166819
166820 166892
woah this schizo thread is still up
Anonymous
No.166820
166821
TmAgVFI.jpeg
>>166819
>schizo
Well, the cat is out of the bag, all governments are together in the conspiracy to hide the truth.
Anonymous
No.166821
166822
>>166815
True, making it into Rarity and making it roleplay a date is.
>>166820
Even North Korea?
Anonymous
No.166822
166823 166824
>>166821
>Even North Korea?
Yes.
The Korean leader made his studies in the west. Did you know it?
Anonymous
No.166823
1qaz.jpeg
>>166822
>The Korean leader made his studies in the west.
Here:

>The international school, Michael Jordan lovin’ days of Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s ‘Supreme Leader’
https://studyinternational.com/news/the-international-school-michael-jordan-lovin-days-of-kim-jong-un-north-koreas-supreme-leader/
He has been well groomed and most likely initiated into the Masonry cult. In other words, the supposedly antagonism with America is theater for the masses.
Anonymous
No.166824
166825 166829
File (hide): B5B665DABE033D00E1C6F9FA0D7B3E80-15897205.mp4 (15.2 MB, Resolution:1280x690 Length:00:01:25, UhOhSlater - smoke.mp4) [play once] [loop]
UhOhSlater - smoke.mp4
33ac27d446d2f6af897ac1aee29455a2b8454151b651849572fa5da8002168a0.jpg
>>166822
Kim Jong Un is too based to lie.
Anonymous
No.166825
166826
Screenshot_20230324_042239.png
>>166824
B-but...
Anonymous
No.166826
166827
>>166825
Keeping you hands warm in the cold is important
Anonymous
No.166827
166828
>>166826
Yeah, right. /s
Anonymous
No.166828
418df68d051720bde33f6bf1da53927e24e66e181730fd020447f4e2652d75ea.gif
>>166827
Anonymous
No.166829
166830
kim-jung-un-dennis-rodman-summit.jpg
3_bbd8b5ae.jpg
>>166824
>Kim Jong Un is too based to lie.
So based that Hollywood sends once in a while a satanic liaison to coordinate with him.
Anonymous
No.166830
166832
image.png
>>166829
satanists are jewish though, dennis rodman is a based nigger like jessie owens
Anonymous
No.166832
166833
>>166830
>satanists are jewish though
Satanists are present in all faiths and their glue is masonry.
Anonymous
No.166833
166834
File (hide): FE909A615F89780946BBC37338FE5B61-12676189.mp4 (12.1 MB, Resolution:856x480 Length:00:05:58, ancient demons in japan.mp4) [play once] [loop]
ancient demons in japan.mp4
>>166832
>Faiths
Jews are a Race. and the Masons bow to them.
Anonymous
No.166834
166835
>>166833
True, masonry is judaism for the goyim.
Anonymous
No.166835
166836
>>166834
The Truth has been Revealed
Anonymous
No.166836
>>166835
>the truth
All governments cooperate with a common goal: NWO.
Also they hide the plane by bending it on a ball.
Anonymous
No.166837
File (hide): 9AFE296D945328025FC5582E62804AA0-1503240.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:00, Flat Earth in 60 seconds.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Flat Earth in 60 seconds.mp4
Flat Earth in 60 seconds.
Anonymous
No.166838
9mzi.jpeg

Anonymous
No.166845
maxresdefault.jpg
>The Achilles' Heel of the New World Order [Our Level Earth Plane] - (2:00 long)
>'Flat Earth' as a term DOES NOT represent a map or a model. It's not an "Archaic Conception", but instead represents free thinking and an ongoing investigation and understanding of where we are, who we are, what we are, when, how, and why.
https://odysee.com/@neohumaneve:e/The-Achilles'-Heel-of-the-New-World-Order--Our-Level-Earth-Plane-_ReMaster-LBRY:8
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u63K2jtGhZit/
A well done short film. 2 minutes long.
Anonymous
No.166848
maxresdefault.jpg
>Moon-Map Revisited - (13:14 long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/moon-map-revisited:9
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4shgGfHXk64
A thought provoking idea. It is not new but it is making inroads for those able to do pattern recognition.
Anonymous
No.166858
proof.png

Anonymous
No.166859
167018
6cf4bd9db3c0e5fa485ac5c80623d96a.jpg
8fa261ab50a7ec73f53f8db16e847613.jpg
D-sZ571WwAE2ma0.jpg
dc8a30e8430272a124448def4d20aac7.jpg
flat-earth-101-1.jpg

Anonymous
No.166860
facts.jpg
facts2.jpg
This goes both ways.
Anonymous
No.166866
FlatEarth.jpg

Anonymous
No.166881
167016
a11.jpg
a12.jpg
a13.jpg
a14.png
a15.jpg

Anonymous
No.166882
167016
a16.jpg
a17.jpg
a18.jpg
a19.jpg
a20.jpg

Anonymous
No.166883
167017
a21.jpg
a22.jpg
a23.jpg
a24.png
a25.jpg

Anonymous
No.166884
166890
b01.jpg
b02.jpg
b03.jpg
b04.png
b05.png

Anonymous
No.166890
>>166884
>Space from space

Basically it's exposure. The ground is bright, it's daytime, the camera only captures light for a tiny bit, so the fainter stars don't get captured, it just looks odd because there's no atmosphere

Cameras generally don't get very good shots of stars I think. Nighttime photography upps the exposure to get better shots. I've noticed this when trying to take pictures of stars or northern lights here with my phone it just shows black
Anonymous
No.166891
E8C45C9C-885A-4E7A-BC9F-52E7AE8534BB..jpg
hidden.png
salt-drawing-28.jpg
>Globe Debunked by Flat Earthers Armed with Lasers
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/globe-debunked-by-flat-earthers-armed:e
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEDMYdAwJtY
This an 1:11m clip from original 13:12 version.
Let the globers' salt begin.
Anonymous
No.166892
166898
z03.png
>>166819
Anonymous
No.166893
768444-2960e677ac8355ab66a1cf07706c259e.jpg

Anonymous
No.166898
166899
>>166892
The earth isn't flat and i don't have le vaxx in my veins, keep coping.
Anonymous
No.166899
166900 166905
>>166898
if not flat, then how it is?
In this thread there are plenty of experiments and science demonstrating that the tall tale about living on a ball is a lie. Can you demonstrate the ball?
Anonymous
No.166900
166901
>>166899
The earth as we know it is just a Hot pond with some islands in it, On a greater Ice Ball that contains more Hot ponds.
Anonymous
No.166901
166902
20e7.gif
>>166900
Gotta a pic to figure it out?
Anonymous
No.166902
166903
1.jpg
>>166901
Yes.
Anonymous
No.166903
166904
glimmer.png
>>166902
Aha. So, it is a theory.
Do you have anything backed by real science applying the scientific method?
Anonymous
No.166904
166905
>>166903
Its as much of a theory as your precious "Flat earth" buddy.
Anonymous
No.166905
166906
>>166904
I don't think so.
See >>166899
Anonymous
No.166906
166907
3E90D833FFF2116BE8A7B3D129344D5E-1371497.png
>>166905
Yea its a you made, so what?
Anonymous
No.166907
166908
fluffy pony.gif
>>166906
>so what?
You have no foundations to argue science. Even you bring the facts or all you have left is trolling.
Anonymous
No.166908
166909 166911 166913
>>166907
Genuine question, do you have autism?
Anonymous
No.166909
166910
pony facts.jpg
>>166908
>derailing
Let us stick to science.
Anonymous
No.166910
>>166909
Diagnosing Autism is a Science.
Anonymous
No.166911
166912 166914
2302934.gif
>>166908
Asking anyone on /mlpol/, or any brony community for that matter, if they're autistic is like asking a scuba diver if water is wet.
Anonymous
No.166912
166914
giggling.png
>>166911
Indeed.
It 's like the newfag needs to lurk moar.
Anonymous
No.166913
166914
80484-ad8tc_facehoof.jpg
>>166908
>newfaggotry
Lurk moar, please.
Anonymous
No.166914
166915
>>166911
>>166913
>>166912
Great more Autists
Anonymous
No.166915
166916
6563509.png
>>166914
>goes to racist mlp imageboard
>goes to flat earth thread
>is surprised by autism
An inability to detect social cues and a general lack of social awareness are both telling signs of autism. Have you had yourself tested?
Anonymous
No.166916
166917
_111.png
>>166915
I Am Based(Not Autistic) and you are Cringe(Autistic)
>Pic rel
Its you
Anonymous
No.166917
166918
1772048.gif
>>166916
>I Am Based(Not Autistic)
It's okay, anon. You're with your own people now.
Anonymous
No.166918
166919
benis.jpg
>>166917
>>I Am Based(Not Autistic)
Yes i am Based (Not Autistic)
Anonymous
No.166919
6492302.png
>>166918
I am Based (Autistic) and you are Cringe(Not autistic)
>Pic rel
Its me
Anonymous
No.166931
File (hide): 06CF215691F40FBDC1B5F961F8C4435D-1677149.mp4 (1.6 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:38, you have no proof at all.mp4) [play once] [loop]
you have no proof at all.mp4
Jason Breshears (Archaix)
>"If the only proof you have is that everybody else believes something, you have no proof at all"
Anonymous
No.166932
File (hide): C083A418B541DCCF105B4355D9594424-5457611.mp4 (5.2 MB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:02:45, Earth is not a spinning ball.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Earth is not a spinning ball.mp4
Earth is not a spinning globe. Case closed, Dismissed, Have a nice day.
Anonymous
No.166969
166970
34904.png
Just try to debunk Flat Earth. See what it happens.
Anonymous
No.166970
166971
>>166969
Nah, I had a friend who tried and he's sucking dicks for globes now.
Anonymous
No.166971
166972 166987
how.jpeg
>>166970
I wonder how he tried. Watching the faith arguments of Professor Dave perhaps?
Anonymous
No.166972
166984
>>166971
Are these two ideas mutually exclusive? It's all perspective.
Anonymous
No.166983
166986
File (hide): 3C034F3CD3E7A55280BB9E0E6E1B7E9D-633168.mp4 (618.3 KB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:00:07, flat earth - touching the moon with a laser.mp4) [play once] [loop]
flat earth - touching the moon with a laser.mp4
Touching the moon with a laser.
Anonymous
No.166984
166985
>>166972
>Are these two ideas mutually exclusive?
According to the heliocentrism's priests, they are.
Anonymous
No.166985
166987
>>166984
I've never heard that before. Citation needed.
Anonymous
No.166986
166988
>>166983
What does this have to do with flat earth?
Also, this looks like a perspective trick to me. While a laser could in theory reach the moon, it would probably get chewed up and refracted by the atmosphere before then.
Anonymous
No.166987
166992
>>166985
>Citation needed.
It is exactly as stated in >>166971
The priests use indiscriminately those opposite ideas to shut down doubts on the heliocentric non-sense.
If you browse NASA' spokepersons on jewtube you'll find out.
Anonymous
No.166988
166991
>>166986
>What does this have to do with flat earth?
Everything. Read the thread and find out more about hypothetical celestial bodies.
Anonymous
No.166991
>>166988
>Read the thread
I did read it.
What a nice way to say you're unable to reiterate your own argument.
Anonymous
No.166992
>>166987
That's not a citation. That's a strawman meme about an absurd opinion that arguably doesn't even exist.
Anonymous
No.167016
>>166881
What is the argument here? That it couldn't have landed on the moon because it looks silly? It's only one small
component of the larger device. It's not aerodynamic because it didn't need to be in space.
>>166882
>living there
I don't think living on the moon would have ever been a realistic idea.
We could've done more, but we decided to give trillions in foreign aid to niggers in Africa instead.
>cat photo
I take it this is a shitpost.
>Cameraman
>who filmed
Does it even cross your mind to look up these questions before you repost these shitty memes?
>Exhaust
Diffused in the vacuum of space.
>Footprint
The two photos are not shot in the same place.
Anonymous
No.167017
>>166883
>Pic 1
Context matters
>"I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again. But going to Mars should be one of the next series of steps that humans do."
He's talking about technology that was destroyed and not updated/maintained since the moon landing because the government didn't care to preserve or continue working on it, because it was expensive to do so. We have the technology in theory; we just don't have the physical equipment.
>pic 2
Your civilian cellphone network is not priority NASA equipment. It's not just a question of technology, but quality of service. They were using the best possible equipment at the time, which had fewer faults than our shitty civilian infrastructure even with today's tech.
Also, I can't even remember the last time I had a dropped call. This meme must be ancient.
>Pic 3
It wouldn't be the first time the government has lost shit, or quietly sold it off to embezzle taxpayers.
>pic 4
>what is folding?
>what is compression?
When was the last time you saw a parachute? Packaging large parachutes in small places isn't hard.
>pic 4
>what is folding?
It was folded. You can literally see the places where the vehicle is designed to fold from this picture.
Anonymous
No.167018
>>166859
>not strong enough to move anything else
We already had this discussion. You must have either ignored the response of refused to acknowledge it.
It doesn't move anything else because solids aren't easy to move, but liquids move easily.
Remember the analogy to the weight of a quarter in your pocket when jumping? That's why you don't feel anything: it's too subtle.
>all these other memes
Ffs, these are the same redundant arguments over and over again. You keep posting more of them, even though any of us could just scroll up to see them.
We talked about Polaris. We talked about curves. We talked about horizon perspective. We talked about how earth looks from space. We talked about boats. We had every one of these topics before, but you keep regurgitating more memes about the exact same thing you've already said, instead of just replying to those same discussions. Why do you keep repeating yourself with things you've already said and posted?
Anonymous
No.167062
Tumblr_l_147815391118923.png

Anonymous
No.167095
167096
flat.jpg

Anonymous
No.167096
167099
>>167095
Does he believe the world is flat? I can't find anything that says he does.
Anonymous
No.167099
167100 167104
>>167096
I don't know. But what I do know is that Bill Nye is a liar and a hack.
Anonymous
No.167100
167101
coincidence .png
>>167099
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VtJFb_P2j48&pp=ygURQmlsbCBueWUgc2V4IGp1bms%3D
Remember when Bill Nye had some show that featured this Jewish gem.
Anonymous
No.167101
eww.png
>>167100
>top debauchery
>gross jewess
Anonymous
No.167104
>>167099
Okay, but what does that have to do with flat earth?
Neither of them believe in flat earth, including the one you said was more qualified.
Bill Nye is a hack and a showman, more of a TV personality than a scientist, but it's not like he invented the concept, nor is he a particularly vocal proponent of it. You won't have to look far here to find people who think he's full of shit, but how is that relevant to the conversation?
Anonymous
No.167111
167113
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFiXEPvK1u8
Level earth
Anonymous
No.167113
167116
>>167111
It's still a decent question though, because the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie, if supposedly the shape were of little actual consequence.
Anonymous
No.167116
167117
>>167113
>the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie
1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
Anonymous
No.167117
167127
>>167116
>1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there? Heck, it would make more sense for them to commercialize it with "edge of the world" resorts and whatnot.
>2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
There are easier ways to do this. Most people believe the earth is round, and most people are still religious. Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious. Also, not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat.
Anonymous
No.167122
16825187581546684868983825623526.png

Anonymous
No.167124
hqdefault.jpg
>The Inverse Square Law Proves Local Sun
>This video demonstrates how the Inverse Square Law proves the sun is local, and disproves the heliocentric model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIjFkdbBe-8
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/the-inverse-square-law-proves-local-sun:5
Anonymous
No.167127
167134
>>167117
>Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there?
There is nothing according to the masons.
>Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious
Round earth is a deceptive statement claiming that The Bible is wrong.
>not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat
Really? Would you mind to provide citations?
Anonymous
No.167133
image.png

Anonymous
No.167134
167140
>>167127
>There is nothing according to the masons.
What is there according to non-masons then? Conventional science says there's outer space and a vast cosmos. What do you think is there?
>>167127
>deceptive statement
It has not notably prevented people from being religious or Christian, so it's a rather impotent method. This isn't really a decent motive for fabricating and maintaining such an elaborate lie that would take tons of resources to keep secret.
>citations
Greeks philosophers 5th century BC:
https://archive.org/details/earlygreekastron0000dick/page/n5/mode/1up
And that's just one example.
Anonymous
No.167139
167140
Bump for subversion
Anonymous
No.167140
167141
>>167139
Agreed.

Also >>167134 is a faggot, he sagged his post and nopony knows when an answer pops up.
Anonymous
No.167141
167144 167145
>>167140
I sage because I only bump good threads.
Anonymous
No.167144
141.jpg
>>167141
You sagged it again.
Anonymous
No.167145
167146
>>167141
Based
Anonymous
No.167146
167147 167154
Twilight_looking_angry_S4E26.jpg
>>167145
Sagging won't make our realm round.
Just saying.
Anonymous
No.167147
1956637.gif
>>167146
Not saging will not make our planet flat.
Just saying
Anonymous
No.167154
>>167146
If you want to bump the thread, bump it yourself.
I sage 1/5 posts I make to this board, and I did on 4chan too. I only bump the highest quality threads.
Anonymous
No.167172
167175
E0g2jPuN2Kg.jpg
>"We haven't been to space." U.S.S.R. Cosmonaut Igor Volk (Confirmed)
>Does the fact that former U.S.S.R. cosmonaut Igor Volk admitting in 2014 that no one has been to space prove the earth is flat? Well, not necessarily, but it certainly evinces that all claims related to space are fake and it demolishes the number one proof of the globe. Furthermore, it proves that BIG lies are not only possible but are happening right now.
>The space deception is everywhere and permeates all major institutions including academia, enforcement agencies, governments, media, and religious institutions.
>This information from a brave whistleblower should be shared everywhere! Everyone should know the name Igor Volk.
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/we-haven't-been-to-space.-u.s.s.r.:8
Mirrors:
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YB3AW9BNNM42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0g2jPuN2Kg
Anonymous
No.167175
167182
>>167172
>number one proof of the globe
People knew the earth was round even before we ever got to space.
Anonymous
No.167182
167308
>>167175
People were actually told that this realm is not a plane.
To believe that lie doesn't change reality.
Anonymous
No.167226
hoax.jpeg
e34f4.jpg
>The Russians Call Out NASA
>The former head of Russia’s Roscosmos space agency, Dmitry Rogozin, has expressed doubt that the US Apollo 11 mission really landed on the Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive proof.
https://voxday.net/2023/05/08/the-russians-call-out-nasa/
https://www.rt.com/russia/575937-roscosmos-rogozin-us-moon-landing-proof/
Anonymous
No.167308
167309
>>167182
no, you can do the experiments for yourself. unfortunately, it does require leaving your mom's house
Anonymous
No.167309
167310
wojak - smug.png
>>167308
>no, you can do the experiments for yourself
Interesting.
Such as?
Anonymous
No.167310
167311
>>167309
how far is the moon from the Earth? (I already know what your answer will be but I want you to say it)
Anonymous
No.167311
167312
>>167310
>how far is the moon from the Earth?
What a disappointment. I was expecting you to describe the experiments.
Anonymous
No.167312
>>167311
I'm getting there retard, answer the question
Anonymous
No.167318
Sc3035.png
>The Flat Earth Metabunk Debunk - Eric Dubay vs Joe Rogan
>The famous UFC commentator believes that people believe the flat earth theory for the fun of it. He said, “Cos’ it’s fun. It’s fun to think you know things that other people don’t know.” He added, “It’s fun to think that everybody else is a sheep and that you understand the firmament that there is this glass cover. The stars are just light in the sky [and] earth is the center of everything, God’s in control of the whole ride.”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/haDW701NxHFb/
Anonymous
No.167319
hqdefault.jpg
>Joe Rogan's Moon Hoax Mystery
>Many years ago Joe Rogan was a passionate and outspoken critic of NASA in general and the Apollo moon landing hoax in particular. He exposed the hoax on Mancow, debated and schooled "Bad Astronomer" Phil Plait and "Bullshit's" Penn Jillette. Then suddenly, with no explanation, shortly after getting his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show on Sci-Fi, Joe did a complete 180 and changed from unequivocally saying "there is no way people landed on the Moon," to saying "there is no way it was a hoax!" In the following video, his best friend Eddie Bravo calls Joe out on this clear, unexpected and mysterious change of heart, saying, "Joe, you used to be the Moon hoax crusader, then something happened. What happened, Joe? What happened?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AfT4saCiRg
Anonymous
No.167320
UjLe5cKrZ2hg_640x360.jpg
>Joe Rogan and Neil DeGrasse Tyson vs. Eric Dubay and Eddie Bravo
>Many years ago before having his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show and before JRE was the world's biggest podcast, Joe Rogan was a vocal proponent exposing NASA's Moon landing hoax. He debated Penn Gillette, Phil Plait, Mancow, and many others brilliantly explaining the problems and inconsistencies with NASA's supposed Moon landings. Then one day, around Joe's Sci-Fi channel show premier, he had NASA spokesman Neil Degrasse Tyson on his podcast, praised him to a sycophantic degree, and back-peddled 180 degrees on his Moon hoax stance from stating unequivocally that (and I quote) "there is no way we went to the Moon," to stating equally unequivocally that, "there is no way that it was a hoax." Since this hypocritical 180, Joe has continued to have Neil Tyson and other establishment shills on his show, while simultaneously silencing and condemning people with anti-establishment views like his best friend Eddie Bravo. In the following video you will see Joe arrogantly, aggressively, and disrespectfully ridiculing and attempting to silence Eddie from speaking his mind about NASA, Flat Earth, Dinosaurs, Chemtrails, and other topics which Joe has clearly become a gate-keeper for.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UjLe5cKrZ2hg/
Anonymous
No.167427
v maxresdefault.jpg
vScreenshot_20230523_232156.png
vScreenshot_20230523_232434.png
vv maxresdefault.jpg
>Night Sky - When Lasers hit the Firmament [ 4K ]
>Scientists claim that they are using the most powerful lasers in the world to project an artificial star in the mesosphere for telescopes.
>They claim that a very thin layer of sodium is excited to glow.
>The problem here, the laser stops abruptly at a barrier. This is not possible, no matter with which wavelength.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maBf0H3UNJI
Mirrors (no 4K):
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/night-sky-when-lasers-hit-the-firmament:8
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tLrZ7GtYXK8M/
Beautiful night sky and music.

-----

The scientific lecture from 2010 explaining the physics of lasers. Then the NASA's claim of what they are doing is bullshit.
>Lene Hau: "Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Lecture, fall 2010
>Lene Hau, Harvard University
>Professor of Physics and Applied Physics :
>"Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Light pulses are slowed in ultra-cold atom clouds to bicycle speed: 24 km/hour, which is 50 million times lower than the light speed in vacuum. In the process the pulses spatially compress by the same large factor, from 1 km to only 0.02 mm at which point they fit entirely within the atom cloud. A light pulse can then be completely stopped for several milliseconds. In our more recent experiments, we take matters further: We stop and extinguish a light pulse in one part of space and revive it in a completely different location. The experiments create a new paradigm for control and inter-conversion of light and matter.... and the secret behind the trick will be revealed in the talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFx8m41QWM
Anonymous
No.167428
bullshit.jpg

Anonymous
No.167442
File (hide): 7FFC16135716C5BC9B1E6BBEEAC11C82-617782.mp4 (603.3 KB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:08, tldr.mp4) [play once] [loop]
tldr.mp4

Business Dog
No.167443
167444 167450
lab-rats-science.jpg
The "Official™" "Experts™" and "Scientists™" claim that stallions can get pregnant, while some claim that only mares can get pregnant - that alone proves that if you truly want or need to know something, it's better to go on the (possibly years long) journey to find out for yourself.

The bigger question is this: are you getting genuine value for your limited and dwindling time and energy spent, by trying to figure out which "scientist™" or "expert™" to trust, and would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
Anonymous
No.167444
167445 167447
7d4d03348f.jpg
>>167443
>would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
It is not only the lie, but what lies behind it.
Anonymous
No.167445
trips.jpg
>>167444
Check' em.
Business Dog
No.167447
167452
Happy_Siblings.jpg
>>167444
My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc. who would otherwise have more time and energy to find out exactly who the enemies actually are, and what other tricks they use.
Also, these "bones" for the goyim to chew on and fight over help fine-tune the enemy's tactics and help them find out the identities of any actual threats who they feel need to be "dealt with" specifically.

I realise that not everyone can stare the monster in the eye directly and needs to use less intimidating subjects and battles to sharpen their skills, but at least be aware that you're choosing to fight inside the terrarium/pen/cage that was set up for you, by the enemy you're trying to outsmart.

The world has existed every day for at least 6000 years - it's not that important to know what shape it is, and arguing over it won't reveal all that much of those who set up the subject for people/stallions/etc. to argue over. That's what I'm Saiyan here. Sorry to be a killjoy, no fun allowed etc., feel free to ignore if need be.

Nevertheless, this argument isn't much different to the "infinite genders" deception: First there were two sexes (easy-peasy so far), then a "jew" came along and changed that to "genders" and people started accepting the new term, so now there are two genders, well since "gender" can now mean what those "jews" who introduced the term want it to mean they can then introduce additional genders and even change the original meaning of that word - further removing people from the actual reality that there still are and always only were two sexes! What's the point of arguing how many genders there are, when there are only two sexes and everything else is a work of "jewish" fiction? (Besides sharpening skills without directly confronting the monster, which could be done in all kinds of other ways.)

Just be aware of the artificially-created cage one enters by taking part in these arguments. One of the first steps of introducing (((communism))) is to remove the "goyim" from a benevolent higher power so they become confused and lost, and then have them fighting/killing each other over artificially-introduced belief-systems.
Anonymous
No.167450
167451
>>167443
>The "Official™" "Experts™" and "Scientists™" claim that stallions can get pregnant
Source? This doesn't sound like a settled topic.
Business Dog
No.167451
>>167450
Oh, sorry I don't have a source on that statement right now, but the Science is Settled™ regardless. :3
Anonymous
No.167452
167453
eldX3QE.png
>>167447
>My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc.
Rebuking heliocentrism is not new and hadn't been introduced by any enemy. It is all the contrary, heliocentrism is a hoax pushed by masons and jesuits.
Also it shouldn't be any infighting if the fags would had any STEM knowledge to follow science and understand that have been duped. This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.
Business Dog
No.167453
167457 167458 167459
>>167452
>This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.

If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road. Therefore, they'd rather just get a quick dopamine fix by making a half-hearted post and going elsewhere. It's a possible explanation.
Learning which battles to pick is pretty important as time grows shorter.

Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth, with everything else that's going on? All that energy would be far better spent on exposing the Holocaust™ lie worldwide, for example. That would wake up far more people to some harsh truths and might inspire them into more productive and positive community-action than to hear that the Earth is different to what was always assumed. Whether round or flat or big or small, it's still going to be the same as yesterday or thousands of years ago, and knowing for certain won't stop the whitey-genocide and (((chicom-style))) prison system being built around us. Just Saiyan.
I guess each side of this argument/topic is frustrated for their own reasons, and that's too bad, especially since the discussion's been going on and being kept alive for so long.
Anonymous
No.167457
e013.jpg
>>167453
>If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road.
Okay, now you make sense. You are in the wrong thread anon.
Anonymous
No.167458
167462
>>167453
I disagree that this is such a time sink. No one has an optimized schedule anyway.

Could you indulge in thought experiment for just a moment? Imagine that the earth actually is flat; and you look out at the horizon and think how it doesn't bend but continue on forever, you look up at the sun see that it's close so that's why it's rays spreads across the world, and you ponder what the stars can be if they aren't suns lightyears away; do you think this would not change you?
Anonymous
No.167459
7410.jpg
>>167453
>Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth
>to get consensus
To hell with consensus, that is anti-science and revolting to the truth.
Anonymous
No.167462
167465
>>167458
You know, Genchink chinkpact's story might be putrid garbage (it is), but the lore is actually pretty neat.
Your post sound like something directly taken from the game, for example.
Anonymous
No.167465
sunbeam.gif
>>167462
Huh? Intresting ^^
Anonymous
No.167504
167509 167516
main-qimg-3b4e5db84d572d582645fec5e1a4b301.jpeg
1515151515151515.jpeg

Anonymous
No.167509
167513
>>167504
That's not the Earth's shadow at all. What you're looking at is the normal appearance of the moon: a bit over half of the moon is illuminated by the sun, while the dark side is dark because it's opposite to the side facing the sun. This is how moon phases work; they have nothing to do with the earth's shadow.

The Earth's shadow only moves in front of the moon during a lunar eclipse, which happens during full moons when the sun is on the opposite side of the earth, relative to the observer's position.
I strongly encourage you to go out at night and watch a lunar eclipse next time one happens in your area: they're not that uncommon. You can watch the Earth's rounded shadow steadily move over the moon in real time (it happens over the course of an hour, unlike moon phases, which take a month). It looks a lot more like the right pic you posted.
Anonymous
No.167512
maxresdefault.jpg
>The Moon Mystery and the Translucent Stars in 4K - (4:07 long)
>I see stars through the moon.
>I show here unedited photos of me with a 16 MegaPixel resolution. Watch the video on a large screen in a dark environment to see all the details. That's why I produced the video in 4K resolution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EuLUTmEgMs
Anonymous
No.167513
167515 167516
>>167509
>while the dark side is dark because it's opposite to the side facing the sun. This is how moon phases work; they have nothing to do with the earth's shadow.
According to the astronomers, the moon phases have everything to do with the Earth' shadow.
Anonymous
No.167515
>>167513
>According to the astronomers, the moon phases have everything to do with the Earth' shadow.
No, they absolutely do not. If you're going to say "according to astronomers", at least cite which ones.
They teach this in middle school, ffs.
Anonymous
No.167516
Moon-phases_cropped2.jpg
lunar-phases-by-Orion-8.jpg
>>167513
>>167504
You are talking out your ass, there are no astronomers who say moon phases have anything to do with the Earth's shadow. Shadows only come into play during lunar eclipses, which are NOT the same as moon phases. Astronomers all say says it's based on the moon's relative position to the sun from ground perspective.
(These graphics are not to scale, but they sum up the concept)

Have you never seen a lunar eclipse before? It's possible that at least one has happened in your lifetime wherever you live.
Anonymous
No.167631
167632
lesson-explaining-deep-subject-evidence-provide-contradict-cognitive-dissonance.jpg
Globers' profound dishonesty.
>Have you ever noticed when explaining a deep subject, no matter how much evidence you provide to some people they will still fight you on it? Not because it's wrong, but because it contradicts everything they've been taught... This is called Cognitive Dissonance.
Anonymous
No.167632
>>167631
Tell us how lunar eclipses work.
Anonymous
No.167635
SOME MORE FLAT EARTH COMMON SENSE TRUTH THAT MAKE YOU SAY HUMMM .mp4
Some more Flat Earth common sense truth that will make you say hummm 🤔
Anonymous
No.167636
167639
movin2.jpg
movin5.jpg

Anonymous
No.167639
167645 167646
>>167636
Didn't we discuss weeks ago that the technology is still existant in theory but the hardware dismantled and unmaintained due to lack of interest/funding?
We could go back if people actually wanted to, although I assume that the people claiming space isn't real aren't interested in that.
Anonymous
No.167645
167651
derpy - laughing.gif
>>167639
>We could go back if people actually wanted to
That's a good one.
Anonymous
No.167646
167650
>>167639
>Didn't we discuss weeks ago that the technology is still existant
It is not if all blueprints were banished. Then no one can push fraud charges.
Anonymous
No.167649
WHO WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY 2016 POPE PUTIN JOHN KERRY.mp4
Rarity_wondering_about_e-mails_EG.jpg
>WHO WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY 2016 - POPE, PUTIN, JOHN KERRY.
What's going on there?
Anonymous
No.167650
>>167646
>all blueprints were banished
They weren't though. The only tech that's sealed is the technology related to our intercontinental ballistic missile system.
Anonymous
No.167651
>>167645
Maybe "if people actually devoted the right time, resources and investment into" is the right term.
But no, the government just keeps sending money to niggers and Israel instead.
Anonymous
No.167652
20230616_000954.png

Anonymous
No.167655
167670
RDT_20230617_0422227001748350842309532.jpg
The photo that NASA doesn't want you to see
Anonymous
No.167670
File (hide): BF5A9BBE1AC93E18F3FB963E02E2AA36-3681175.mp4 (3.5 MB, Resolution:852x480 Length:00:02:10, Exposing NASA fake imagery.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Exposing NASA fake imagery.mp4
>>167655
>The photo that NASA doesn't want you to see
Aha!
Let's find out what is about NASA's fake pics.
Anonymous
No.167917
168058
20230626_201819.png

Anonymous
No.168058
>>167917
Twilight knows the truth.
Anonymous
No.168059
168060
RioMoon.jpg

Anonymous
No.168060
168061
>>168059
Excellent picture, but what's this have to do with flat earth?
Anonymous
No.168061
168062 168064
Mw9wEpv.gif
>>168060
Perhaps to show appreciation for the plasma disk?
Anonymous
No.168062
168063 168064
>>168061
For a disk of plasma, it sure seems to have an interesting 2D map. Almost like the object is 3D and has craters which are visible at different times. Unless plasma takes forms that have the appearance of craters which don't shift while observed, yet repeats the same patterns.
Anonymous
No.168063
168064
mlpol.jpeg
>>168062
>Almost like the object is 3D and has craters which are visible at different times
>3D
Interesting theory, but there is a problem. If the moon is a ball in space, how so all the craters are perpendicular and not even one shows an angular impact?
Anonymous
No.168064
168065 168069
>>168061
The sun is plasma (among other things). The moon is quite visibly a solid body of material, as those exact craters haven't observably changed since time immemorable. Plasma is fluid, and wouldn't have distinctive craters and ridges for any considerable period (although it could still have them briefly, such as with sun spots).
But overall, this still isn't super relevant to flat earth, aside from vague implied criticism of conventional astrology, which is I guess is barely relevant to the narrative.
This is my first time hearing a proposition that the moon is flat though, although imo that's even less believable than flat earth, because the curve of the moon is unironically, literally, easily visible, as per >>168062 explains

>>168063
>not even one shows an angular impact?
They literally do. You can see the minute elliptical ovals and rides to indicate impact angle. Some of them are shaped like long streaks. There are entire teams of people dedicated to mapping the geological (lunarlogical?)history of the moons craters to determine what caused them and approximately how long ago. The craters have names and measurements and very detailed mapping. You just need to look closer to them (as with a telescope).
Anonymous
No.168065
168066 168070
>>168064
>They literally do. You can see the minute elliptical ovals and rides to indicate impact angle. Some of them are shaped like long streaks.
Show me those shapep like long streaks please.
Also, if the fake Newtonian law is applied, there is a discrepancy with Earth, supposedly both, Earth and Moon are celestial bodies under the same gravitational laws, but on Earth no meteorite has never ever fell perpendicularly. Strange, isn't it?
Anonymous
No.168066
168067
>>168065
>no meteorite has never ever fell perpendicularly.
Is this a typo?
Anonymous
No.168067
>>168066
yup
Anonymous
No.168069
168070
>>168064
>But overall, this still isn't super relevant to flat earth
Astronomy is indeed, those firmament lights are very relevant as they are components of this realm.
Anonymous
No.168070
168071 168072
>>168065
I don't know why its so important that they come in perpendicular, because there's a lot of angles that they could approach from, especially if they fell from an elliptical orbit around the earth. Meteors typically come at a an elliptical angle, which is why you can see those long trails of smoke stretching across the sky after they land.
They would only come in at a semi-perpendicular angle if they hit the earth at a particular angle, and more importantly at incredibly high speed and mass to have not orbited the earth or slingshotted around it for any period, but instead just hit it directly. Those kind of huge heavy objects barreling towards the earth are rather rare, even among meteor impacts (thank God). I think the most iconic example would be the one would be the one that smashed into the gulf of Mexico during the late Cretaceous period, which seemed to have just barreled right towards the planet and hit it directly and bringing it's destruction with it.
>>168069
Well, maybe next time post some context/argument with the picture if you have an actual point to make, instead of just image-dumping.
Thing is, the earth and moon being flat are actually two separate cosmological debates. If I proved to you the moon was round, it wouldn't necessarily prove the earth was, and vise versa. You could hypothetically have a flat earth and round moon, or a round earth and flat moon.
If you want to continue this, go ahead and post more arguments/evidence for flat moon, but it feels like a red herring for the flat earth discussion.
Anonymous
No.168071
168074
77be960de18e35e13d06bfbde3e47239-field.png
>>168070
Forgot pic. This was the trail of one that landed on a sorry guy's house last may. It did indeed come at an elliptical angle.
Gosh I'm tired.
Anonymous
No.168072
168073
>>168070
>Well, maybe next time post some context/argument with the picture if you have an actual point to make, instead of just image-dumping.
Come on, loosen up anon. The pic is breathtaking and cool.
Anonymous
No.168073
>>168072
I said it was good, but posting it in this thread implies an argument about flat earth, which wasn't posted until inquired.
Anonymous
No.168074
168163
fluttershy - smug.png
>>168071
>It did indeed come at an elliptical angle.
>Gosh I'm tired.
No doubt. The mental gymnastics to explain the discrepancy must take most of your energy.
Anonymous
No.168075
Floridian Justin Harvey exposing NASA's International Fake Station.mp4
2023-04-04.
>Floridian Justin Harvey exposing NASA's International Fake Station
Anonymous
No.168161
168219 168599
AAchasing-the-stars-compressed.gif
Sirius never moves, it is fixed in the sky.
Anonymous
No.168163
>>168074
Do you have an actual rebuttal?
Anonymous
No.168219
>>168161
>Sirius
Five days have passed and not one single baller caught the mistake.
Pathetic.
Anonymous
No.168221
168222
gravity.jpeg
Gravity, not even the science priests actually know what it is.
Anonymous
No.168222
168224
>>168221
They don't know because it's not exactly easy to understand. It's one of those great mysteries of the cosmos
They could always just make stuff up if they were just bullshitting the whole thing *cough* dark matter *cough* but it's not that simple. There are many different theories for how it works, and questions for what holds things together at the outer reaches of the universe.
Anonymous
No.168224
168225 168226 168228 168230
facehoof.jpg
Esafsa73.jpeg
>>168222
>gravity
>They don't know because it's not exactly easy to understand. It's one of those great mysteries of the cosmos
It is called DENSITY and explains everything darling.
Anonymous
No.168225
168235
>>168224
It's no mystery that gravity is based on density. Even the guy in the meme could've told you that.
Anonymous
No.168226
168236
Only believing what they want to believe.webm
>>168224
>Observable
>Repeatable
>Measureable
It's funny how you think that those alone is how things are "proven".
Anonymous
No.168228
>>168224
Gravity is observable, repeatable and measurable. We know the rate of acceleration of gravity, and can observe it's effects on tides, terrestrial life and interstellar objects.
What we don't know is precisely why and how gravity works, only that it does. I don't see a sophisticated explanation on the metaphysical mechanics of relative density either.
Anonymous
No.168230
168233
>>168224
No idea what relative density even has to do with concave brained earth. It's not like density doesn't exist under Neutonian gravity, or even relativistic gravity.
Anonymous
No.168233
>>168230
And even if it were something separate entirely, it's not like there's any more of a metaphysical explanation for it than gravity has. May as well be the wojak in the other pic on a fool's errand to explain precisely how and why lighter materials float.

Also worth noting that objects weigh the same in vacuum chambers, so relative density can't be the only force at play.
Anonymous
No.168235
168254
3605.png
>>168225
>It's no mystery that gravity is based on density
Careful anon, Density is not the same than mass.
Anonymous
No.168236
168237 168255
>>168226
>Observable
>Repeatable
>Measureable
>It's funny how you think that those alone is how things are "proven".
The 3 items mentioned above are cornerstones of the Scientific Method. Gravity doesn't meet any of those 3 parameters and therefore is just pitiful pseudoscience.
Anonymous
No.168237
168238
>>168236
>Observable
Every observable quality of gravity lines up with predictions made before the model was formed.
>Repeatable
I think the fact we can fly across the breadth of the earth at a stable velocity in what we feel as a straight line showcases that our models for gravity and how best to work around and within it have been repeated pretty thoroughly.
>Measurable
Not one flat earth model to scale can even be produced, let alone without conflicting with itself. Meanwhile we have both Newton's and Einstein's models of gravity which match our experience about as closely as is possible

The reason I'm not even bothering to bust out the math and graphs is because, as has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt through this thread, any physical evidence produced in favor of a round earth or gravity working as we understand it will simply be dismissed as part of the cover-up. If I sit here and argue flight paths you're gonna tell me that pilots simply choose the least effective flightpaths to maintain the illusion of sphericity. That any and all mathematic models related to large celestial bodies are inventions of the masons. This song and dance is tiresome.
Anonymous
No.168238
168239
>>168237
FYI. When this bread reaches 2,000 posts I'll make a fresh one.
Anonymous
No.168239
168240
>>168238
And you spamming faggots call me a bad actor with ill intent.
Anonymous
No.168240
>>168239
B-but you want this thread to keep going forever?
Anonymous
No.168254
>>168235
You're right. I stand corrected.
Anonymous
No.168255
>>168236
How does it not meet those?
Anonymous
No.168397
168411
received_673148344240883.jpg
Can any flat earthers tell me more about what glory lies beyond the great ice wall? What civilizations and explorers might've journeyed past it?
Anonymous
No.168410
168413 168624
01 Aukland to Lima Peru.png
02 Auckland to Mexico City.png
03 Buenos Aires to Delhi India.png
Fresh memes just baked. HiRes.
Flight Route Memes.
Anonymous
No.168411
168429
12f1.png
>>168397
Sagging will give you the attention you wanted and deserve. None.
Anonymous
No.168412
maxresdefault.jpg
>Are Globe Believers Really That Smart? - (3:06 long)
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/are-globe-believers-really-that-smart:3
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WwyOU50Q_8
Anonymous
No.168413
168414
>>168410
>why do commercial flights sometimes take detours or stop in other places
I have one very simple explanation, and it doesn't involve the entire world being topsy turvy: there is not enough financial incentive for a commercial flight which often requires a certain number of seats filled to be profitable to go to your specific destination from your specific departure region. Example, Mexico is a developing country which is decently populated but generally quite poor; Los Angeles is in the country closest to Mexico in a state right against its border. More people in California are either beaners or have the affluence to vacation in a poor place to get their cheap hookers and margaritas.

This is one of the reasons that flights to Christchurch are somewhat sparse depending on where you're departing from; New Zealand isn't that big of a country and Christchurch is not very populous or mainstream of a place (unless you're the PM of NZ touring to apologize to the poor Muslims for evil white people)
Anonymous
No.168414
168415
Flight Route - Johannesburg to Wellington, NZ stops in Doha.png
Flight Route - Montevideo to Perth crosses the Equator two times.png
Flight Route - Sydney to Lima, Peru stops in Los Angeles.png
>>168413
>profitability
I heard that many times and for the unaware to the heliocentric model lie makes totally sense, however taking a closer look, the cost for extra fuel makes no sense and the detours are way, way, way too long.
Anonymous
No.168415
168416
>>168414
You do know that map of yours is a warped, not-to-scale interpretation of a globe earth using the north pole as its center, and the lines spaced out as a means of illustrating the distortion as the southern hemisphere is warped beyond all recognition, right?
Anonymous
No.168416
168417
31858.png
>>168415
>You do know that map of yours is a warped, not-to-scale interpretation of a globe earth using the north pole as its center
It is as it is according to cartography scientifically drawn. See >>149243
Anonymous
No.168417
168418 168419
>>168416
Alexander Gleason patented his work in the US patent numbered 497,917, stating the following:
>"The extorsion of the map from that of a globe consists, mainly in the straightening out of the meridian lines allowing each to retain their original value from Greenwich, the equator to the two poles."
In the queen's English, what he's saying is that he knowingly used a globe shaped map of Earth, shifted perspective to the north pole, and extrapolated with even lines with reference to the meridian in order to come up with simplified time zones. Funny how your purpose is cartography for ease of navigation, instead of the establishment of simplified time zones. Why would he have to adapt his map from the globe model if this were a flat-earth researcher?

As a little side note to showcase why I'm not taking your argument that "it's just so far!" to heart: Greyhound buses have long distance detours all the time. The trip from Fayetteville NC to Columbia MO went as far south as Atlanta GA, both ways. This is because Fayetteville really isn't a super major city aside from the military base within it, and outside of the military which will happily pay their recruits' flight bills to go anywhere within the US, average Joes aren't vacationing to a college city in good ol' Misery where life is expensive and very unattractive for tourism.
Anonymous
No.168418
168420
>>168417
>In the queen's English, what he's saying is that he knowingly used a globe shaped map of Earth, shifted perspective to the north pole, and extrapolated with even lines with reference to the meridian in order to come up with simplified time zones.
I believe your are flipping the meaning. He calls the ball map out.
Anonymous
No.168419
168420
BEFEEEF382D79B27E55F7876B7FCE216-135944.jpg
>>168417
And the map issue is not restricted to that map in particular because the German High Command and the USAF also used that Flat Earth map to conduct the war. See >>157419
Anonymous
No.168420
168421
>>168418
I can forgive you for thinking that he's calling the globe some kind of extortion in the legal sense of the word, but in the context of the sentence he seems quite clear in saying "the difficult obtaining/crafting of this map from the other map" -- otherwise, he would be calling himself an extortionist twisting the arms of globe-earth cartographers to get them to confess to the reeeaaal map, which I highly doubt.
>>168419
I could name a dozen armies who used any vaguely representative maps for their planning, whether highly accurate or not, so long as they had some kind of handle on the topography of the region he is acting upon, which I can easily assume is on his other, more local maps. The map distorts the northern hemisphere the least. Now if Hitler decided he'd fly bombers over Australia or Argentina and he used that map, he'd be bombing water with how off-base he'd be.
Anonymous
No.168421
168422
File (hide): 2064E40DA482C0AADDFE3D14BA6C7CBF-5491858.mp4 (5.2 MB, Resolution:216x480 Length:00:04:02, flat earth - air force map.mp4) [play once] [loop]
flat earth - air force map.mp4
>>168420
>I could name a dozen armies who used any vaguely representative maps for their planning
It is up to you if choose to believe the teachings for nomies or go straight for the maps used by professionals.
Anonymous
No.168422
168423
>>168421
I literally couldn't even see a map in the first clip until the arrow pointed at it. The lines aside from the rings around what seem to be the center point don't even seem to have a pattern to them. The video of the phoneposter waving at a paper map is so low resolution and unfocused that I genuinely can't figure scale or even differentiation of countries' shapes. It looks like a high-fantasy map png you see hung up on an orc's fucking wall at a comically low resolution, or some kind of meme with a fisheye lens with its focal point somewhere that was totally arbitrary. I can't see the mileage markings, I can't see the flight lines themselves even with his finger going over them.

The line about curved/arced flights also showcases that you have never thrown a ball straight up while on a moving object. When something is moving or rotating, and you are going with its motion, you are essentially swimming along with the tide as opposed to upstream, which consumes less fuel and takes less time. Some flat earth proponents say this is just because of wind, but no wind speeds even remotely high enough to make a major difference have ever been recorded even amid hurricanes. And some of these inter-continental flights go in opposite directions simultaneously, are the wind currents localized to the planes, like a state-spanning tornado surrounding each individual plane that flies one way so they both make it to their destination quickly?
Anonymous
No.168423
168424 168431
stubb.png
>>168422
As I said, it is your choice which framework of knowledge you use.
Anonymous
No.168424
168430
>>168423
Let's see, the framework which seems to purport to all the evidence and doesn't require believing the entirety of humanity has been duped into some mostly-inconsequential model of reality which only affects physicists and physicists seem just dandy doing experiments with.......or the one where gravity is actually electromagnetism but magnetic materials and forces are unaffected by its pull toward the Earth, the moon is a hologram or a flat object which everyone at every place in the world sees exactly the same way, eclipses require an anti-moon to explain, and plane travel is conducted entirely by conspirators of the NWO.

Oh yeah, you're right. Flat earth sure is an entertaining model. For science fiction novels.
Anonymous
No.168429
>>168411
Why would you sage if you want attention?
Anonymous
No.168430
>>168424
>and plane travel is conducted entirely by conspirators of the NWO.
The plane model isn't even correct. It's just using "popular travel" routes, which are designed around providing airplanes with the most financially profitable routes, as in where civilization actually exists, as an example of said "conspiracy". This is despite the fact that you can personally charter a direct flight from one of those locations to another for a bit more money, but that's also further "solidifying" the conspiracy angle because you have to pay real money to do it.
Anonymous
No.168431
168582
>>168423
Horsie knows what's right. Listen to horsie.
Anonymous
No.168460
168572
maxresdefault.jpg
>How a Pilot Ended the Globe - (7:54 long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/how-a-pilot-ended-the-globe:4
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFz4ZZd1zj4
Another nail on the globe coffin and this one is really big.
-----

Original night flight video: https://www.beyondclouds.ch/2017/04/05/vuelo-nocturno-the-magic-of-flying-at-night/
Anonymous
No.168461
maxresdefault.jpg
Scr5327.png
>Jesuits Erasing our Flat Earth - Documentary - (25:38 long)
>How the biggest deception started and who promoted it, narrated by Johnny Cirucci. From the Holy Roman Empire, to modern times, while explaining the Jesuit connection with Pythagoras, Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, Einstein, etc.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u2N9xKJZA5zP/
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olbyJDou4qQ
It is a solid, informative documentary.
Anonymous
No.168572
168573
maxresdefault.jpg
>>168460
>How a Pilot Ended the Globe
Here's the 3rd part watching the stars moving in a totally different fashion than expected by the ballers.

>4,656 Miles and Zero Curvature - Part 3 (How a Pilot Ended the Globe) - (2:36 long)
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/4,656-miles-and-zero-curvature-part-3:2
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RagVOOW-sa8
Anonymous
No.168573
168574
>>168572
>more "wer do i go down doe" arguments
Allow me to put this in terms that even you might understand. Imagine, if you will, that there is a rubber band of a very specific distance connecting you and a plane to the very center of a ball earth. Elevation from the center would be exactly the same on a round trip no matter where you go. The "band" pulls in a manner that you could pull it further by tilting up, loosen it by tilting down, or stay at the same length with a moderate amount of downward force which is resisted by your craft on account of being aerodynamic.

You don't need to actively try to point down because the angle changing is imperceptibly small and elevation is not changing relative to the center of the earth on a cruise route.
Anonymous
No.168574
168575
>>168573
>The "band" pulls in a manner that you could pull it further by tilting up, loosen it by tilting down, or stay at the same length with a moderate amount of downward force which is resisted by your craft on account of being aerodynamic.
That's a fine explanation if you want to stick to the delusion; however the stars don't lie, if this realm would be a ball, stars would move upwards and they don't.
Anonymous
No.168575
168576
>>168574
>the stars don't lie
You mean the stars that look different from places on different areas instead of looking the same across the flat earth? The stars that proponents of flat earth have to come up with shit like "personalized stars" to explain?
Anonymous
No.168576
168577 168579
sextant.jpg
k2552.jpg
576x768bb.jpg
the-constellation-sextans-star-in-the-night-sky-free-vector.jpg
>>168575
>the stars that look different from places on different areas
>personalized stars
Well, I don't want to gloat but you might need a bit of training on using the starts to navigate.
Anonymous
No.168577
168579 168580 168582 168585
>>168576
From the north hemisphere, the "starts" rotate in one direction, and from the south hemisphere, the "starts" rotate the other way. How is this? Imagine how that would look from a flat earth model. Imagine someone looking south from the south ends of South America, Africa, or Australia. On a round earth, aside from potential timezone differences, these people can all look south and see the Southern Cross. On a flat earth, these people are literally on opposite ends of the realm. How the fuck is that explicable with a flat earth?
Anonymous
No.168579
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168576
>>168577
Actually, to add to that, what the fuck is """south""" on a flat earth? These people would be looking in entirely different directions on the flat earth map, looking directly to the closest direction of the outer ring of Antarctica.

>>168578
What???
Anonymous
No.168580
168581 168583 168585
>>168577
The planed crossed the Ecuator tropic. Did you notice that happening?
Anonymous
No.168581
168583
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168580
Why did you delete your post if you're not even going to spellcheck what you said? How does this make it so these three countries' southernmost points are literally looking in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS?
Anonymous
No.168582
>>168577
>>168431
Anonymous
No.168583
168584
>>168581
Back to the topic. See >>168580
Anonymous
No.168584
168586
>>168583
???????????
Firstly you literally changed the topic of the stars and then told me to get "back to the topic." Secondly, how the fuck does the planet cross a tropic? Tropic literally means a region of the planet.
Anonymous
No.168585
>>168580
Back to topic see >>168577 >>168579
Anonymous
No.168586
168587
img-2763220-1-rainbow_dash_lip_bite_by_daviez20-d4x5vf4.gif
>>168584
>how the fuck does the planet cross a tropic?
This is elementary school geography class. In my region I learnt about tropics perhaps when I was 10. I assume you are the product of the Rockefeller curriculum, so, it is not your fault.
Seriously, would you like to talk about Hollywood movies instead?
Anonymous
No.168587
168588
>>168586
>Tropic literally means a region of the planet.
Anonymous
No.168588
168589 168590
world-map-with-equator-and-tropics.jpg
>>168587
Rockefeller curriculum indeed. The jews did a very good job retarding the population.
Anonymous
No.168589
168591
>>168588
This doesn't clear anything up.
Anonymous
No.168590
>>168588
And U are the biggest example.
Anonymous
No.168591
168592
>>168589
It was you who said the stars rotate in opposite directions in every hemisphere, then, if you know the very basics of geography...
I'm not saying that's incorrect, I'm saying where in the video happened? And because you have no clue and speaks only because of the movies and what the school taught you, you are more than confused.
Stick to Flat Earth fren, even if you insist you live on a ball, you will learn A LOT about STEM subjects and many other useful themes.
Anonymous
No.168592
168593
the red space is the southern hemisphere.png
>>168591
>I'm not saying that's incorrect, I'm saying where in the video happened?
Motherfucker, go to the southern hemisphere. Set up a telescope and watch the change over the night. Fucking drive to South America through Mexico. It's not some super obscure thing that nobody is allowed to see because the EU will stop you by any means necessary.

And since you've completely ignored this point because you think naming tropics invalidates it: how do these three locations see the same Southern Cross?
Anonymous
No.168593
168594
13905.png
>>168592
>Motherfucker, go to the southern hemisphere.
Ahem.
Anonymous
No.168594
168595
>>168593
>this time I'm not disagreeing because that would make me sound like a massive retard
>but also hurr hurr hollywooded
Anonymous
No.168595
168596
>>168594
Be sport anon. You stepped on a field that is not your league.
The best and advisable thing to do is to retreat and read some books.
Anonymous
No.168596
168597
not gonna let up on this one.jpg
>>168595
Shut the fuck up. How do Australians, Africans and South Americans see this?
Anonymous
No.168597
168598
>>168596
I think you should explain it (I suspect you can't).
Is it one of those personalized stars you were talking about? /s
Anonymous
No.168598
168599
like this shitheel.jpg
>>168597
Because all three continents are on the southern hemisphere, and looking south would mean looking in the same direction.
All maps that flat earthers have made contradict this. They have these people all looking in three radically different directions and seeing the same star. What's YOUR explanation?
Anonymous
No.168599
168600 168601
>>168598
>They have these people all looking in three radically different directions and seeing the same star.
But not in the same sky position at the same time because the stars are rotating on the firmament. See >>168161
Anonymous
No.168600
168602
>>168599
So according to you south is different at different times of day. Compasses have no function at all. Okay.
How about the planet and daylight obstruct visibility? Is that really hard to believe?
Anonymous
No.168601
>>168599
And actually, two of those countries CAN see the same star at the same time. Just have to have one at early night and one at late night/early morning to sync it up. But completely possible.
Anonymous
No.168602
168603 168604
>>168600
>So according to you south is different at different times of day.
Not the South only. I am talking about different locations (or geographical longitud), each fag standing at different longitudes will see at the same time X star at different positions.
Anonymous
No.168603
this is your mindset.png
>>168602
Aside from the rotation which we all see happening, everything is quite static out there, on behalf of how far away they are.
And regardless, the model you touted and continue to tout shows THIS. So this is law now.
Anonymous
No.168604
168605 168606
untitled-design-18.jpg
>>168602
>geographical longitud)
I am sorry, I forgot your Rockefeller curriculum.
Anonymous
No.168605
168606
fuck you.png
>>168604
Fuck off nigger.
Anonymous
No.168606
168607
>>168605
If you see the >>168604 pic, you may notice that a faggot on the North Pole on a ball will be in the same situation than your pic of a flat surface.
Just saying.
Anonymous
No.168607
168608 168610
>>168606
What, he's gonna look through the ground he's standing on to see the Southern Cross?
Anonymous
No.168608
168609
>>168607
>Rockefeller curriculum again
Look again both pics, imagine yourself with a compass on the north pole and pointing at different locations named south. See the similarity?
Anonymous
No.168609
>>168608
You mean the magnet fails to work because you're literally on the opposite pole? If you pick a direction and go straight, eventually it'll end up going to the south pole. How does someone on the north pole on a flat earth not see the Southern Cross if it's flat?
Anonymous
No.168610
168611 168616
>>168607
At this point I am wondering. Are you even White?
Anonymous
No.168611
168613
>>168610
At this point, I'm wondering. Are you even White?
Anonymous
No.168613
168614
>>168611
Just to inform you. At school always was forbidden to use an electronic calculator until the Calculus level was reached. Yes, it was stressed to use the brain on long manual calculations, very prone to error, over the convenience of machines.
That was not a Rockefeller curriculum at all.
Anonymous
No.168614
168615
>>168613
Maybe they don't like third graders using an electronic calculator for their times tables because they're teaching them to actually do arithmetic.
Anonymous
No.168615
168617
The+Matrix+Equation +AX=B.jpg
calculus-integrals.jpg
maxresdefault.jpg
>>168614
>third graders
Yeah, right.
Anonymous
No.168616
168618
since you are soliciting muh doxxx here you go nigger.jpg
>>168610
Anonymous
No.168617
hmmmmmm.jpg
>>168615
What precisely is the point of talking about calculator usage? Just another ginormous-faggot topic switch?
Anonymous
No.168618
168619
Picture 2023-08-10 02-35-36.png
>>168616
My skin is my uniform.
Anonymous
No.168619
168620
this is you boom boom.png
>>168618
>that skin
>that arm hair
Whaddya know, he is a boomer! Thanks for taking the bait I guess. You're still a massive faggot though.
Anonymous
No.168620
1502993.gif
>>168619
>hair
This is not happening.
Anonymous
No.168622
168623
Flateq.jfif
>tfw Equestria is based and flatpilled

is Lauren Faust /our/ flat earth girl?
Anonymous
No.168623
twilight - yes.png
>>168622
Of course.
Anonymous
No.168624
flight route - johannesburg to wellington, nz stops in doha.png
flight route - montevideo to perth crosses the equator two times.png
flight route - sydney to lima, peru stops in los angeles.png
flight route - sydney to mexico city stops in los angeles.png
>>168410
Moar HiRes Flight Route memes.
Anonymous
No.168668
image0-1.gif
perspective_mirage_horizon_optics.jpg
FB_IMG_1680818573367.png
IMG_1874.png
IMG_0852.jpg
Flat Earth is one of the most political topics out there yet it needs to be contained in the paranormal section
Anonymous
No.168669
168671
moon_isnt_spherical.jpeg
1692077273657797m.jpg
6b270d5fd4b621cdd955d09a25f891e2.jpg
307925042_3115017798809407_8105606373321312621_n.jpg
1690743954863822m.jpg

Anonymous
No.168671
168672 168675
>>168669
Can I have the source for pic 1? That doesn't look like the moon to me.
Also, what's up with pic 4? You can see everything Galileo did with a modern telescope. The only difference between now and then is light pollution, which is solved by going somewhere secluded.
Anonymous
No.168672
168673 168674
not again.jpg
>>168671
I'm not the poster but, this cannot be happening at /mlpol/.
F
Anonymous
No.168673
168685
>>168672
Well, to me it looks like a photo of the sun. The moon has visible craters.
Anonymous
No.168674
168677
PJFq.gif
>>168672
>this cannot be happening at /mlpol/
Oh noooo, don't ever ask for the sauce for pics. That never happens on chandites.
Anonymous
No.168675
168676
>>168671
>You can see everything Galileo did with a modern telescope
Again, I'm not the posters, but if you go to jewtube and search for moon+nikon you might conclude that Galileo was a nigger.
Anonymous
No.168676
168678
>>168675
What did Galileo see that I can't now?
Anonymous
No.168677
168681
>>168674
B-but, what difference does it make?
Anonymous
No.168678
168680
>>168676
Check yourself out at jewtube anon. Spoonfeeding is not in the menu today.
Anonymous
No.168680
168682
>>168678
>Spoon-feeding
>implying
I asked to to elaborate on what you said. If you can't even do that, how am I supposed to take you seriously?
Anonymous
No.168681
>>168677
None.
Anonymous
No.168682
168684
>>168680
It's your opinion.
Anonymous
No.168684
168686
94672303805e953ccd2464d994cd5af5.png
>>168682
Enjoy your discussionless meme-dump then.
Anonymous
No.168685
File (hide): F2D77061C613247E4D4F358C3687A8F8-3481057.mov (3.3 MB, Resolution:576x950 Length:00:00:26, 69052262372 (1).mov) [play once] [loop]
69052262372 (1).mov
>>168673
craters or lumps?
Anonymous
No.168686
168688
>>168684
Fellow Equestrian, I just came home, I'm dirty and hungry, I have 4 messages and 3 emails plus a ton to check online before even to engage you again. Please by patient. Thank you.
Anonymous
No.168688
>>168686
Nigger, people are just responding to things you say. Respond in time or wait to respond, stop announcing every time you take a nap.
Anonymous
No.168721
168722
61642c952a9f57c3.png

Anonymous
No.168722
168730 168731
>>168721
Those are vapor trails. They dissipate and distort immediately, and they're nowhere near long enough to show visible curves relative to the earth.
Not only that, this photo is taken at a worms-eye angle where vertical curvature wouldn't be visible even if they were long enough.
This is so retarded, it must be a joke. I think you just reposted satire.
Anonymous
No.168730
contrail vs chemtrail.jpeg
>>168722
>Those are vapor trails.
Mmmmm, it doesn't look like.
Anonymous
No.168731
168732
Y6yi3qW.jpeg
b1f11aa40b24d0c163d7622cd6e0abb90ec9441a6e816a0d323ea1c58e28bca4_1.jpg
cdn.minds.jpeg
chemtrails.jpg
>>168722
>This photo is taken at a worms-eye angle where vertical curvature wouldn't be visible even if they were long enough
A better angle to show that there is not any curvature perhaps?
Anonymous
No.168732
>>168731
Well, first of all, they are visibly curved in those pics, just not curved in any particular direction: these lines are hardly ever straight in the first place, so you wouldn't notice the curve even if they were there.
Second of all, they're not long enough to see visible curvature for the same exact reason why you can't see the cube of the horizon.
Anonymous
No.168967
168971
dvdled.jpeg
49f52d64960b23f9d9b806897d1e233e.png
>NASA shows sportsmanship by congratulating India on beating the US to the moon's South Pole - BUT Russia and China stay silent after the Chandrayaan-3 craft makes history
>India has landed on the moon's South Pole - an unmapped region of the surface
>The nation now joins Russia, China and the US in landing on the moon
>Chandrayaan-3 will determine if water ice is hiding in the South Pole region
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12436887/Indias-Chandrayaan-3-makes-history-landing-moons-South-Pole-time-beating-Russia-China-USA.html
Yeah, right.
The NASA moon mission v2.0, shitskin version is soooooooo credible. Nevertheless that space does not exist, but the normie has to be fed more illusions.
Anonymous
No.168971
169048
>>168967
Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week. It was probably rushed out because they wanted to do it before the Pajeets (not to mention budget cuts in favor of the Ukraine war), and now they're embarrassed at letting street-shitters beat them in rocket science because.
China isn't saying anything because they don't want to acknowledge that the Pajeets might rival them in technology, since they've been wanting to land there as well. Their relationship with India is also fairly adversarial, despite trying to cooperate with BRICS.
Unless you're implying that Russia and China are only staying silent because they don't want to corroborate the concept that space is real? It's a bit late for that, as they both have their own space programs. They're
>The NASA moon mission v2.0
Which mission? There were several.
Also you're giving NASA too much credit. NASA hasn't been able to land any probes on the moon's south pole. They lost to Pajeets. It's kind of a big deal in the world of space expeditios, because the moon's south pole's potential for water and minerals may make it a site of interest for future operations.

Of course, I don't expect you to believe anything about what I just said. I'm just commenting on the news for anyone else who has to see it the next time this thread gets bumped.
Anonymous
No.169047
169051 169054 169057 169086
maxresdefault.jpg
wsx.jpg
>Chandrayaan-3 - More of India's CGI Moon Landing
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/chandrayaan-3-more-of-india's-cgi-moon:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPJQp3tTGI
These masons are getting more absurd by the day.
Anonymous
No.169048
169053
>>168971
>Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week.
And you believe them. /s
C'mon we are well beyond the "just trust us" point.
>China isn't saying anything
Anon, all space agencies are ran by the same hoaxers.
Anonymous
No.169049
169052
U452d.jpeg
I know the shitskins are a joke, but if they for real released this CGI then there is not hope for them.
https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1695415299774849291
Anonymous
No.169051
169201
File (hide): 1508D0D1AFF8057DED235F7D23A73691-494488.mp4 (482.9 KB, Resolution:360x480 Length:00:00:16, The India Moon Landing .mp4) [play once] [loop]
The India Moon Landing .mp4
>>169047
I'm telling you right now. That CGI is not real.
Anonymous
No.169052
>>169049
Where is this video from? I can't find it anywhere.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tXbH6E8vDsg
All the pics I of earth I'm finding from the mission look something like the link above.
Anonymous
No.169053
169056
>>169048
Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
>And you believe them.
What is there to believe if they didn't say anything?
Anonymous
No.169054
169055
>>169047
Where are these videos from?
Anonymous
No.169055
169059
Untitled.jpeg
>>169054
You have to go to the source of mass propaganda dissemination.
Anonymous
No.169056
169058 169060
>>169053
>Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
Cos that's the point of this hoax and narrative. The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west. Both Russia and China are main branches of the NWO, and they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight.
It is all smoke and mirrors to shape further the mind of the masses.
Anonymous
No.169057
>>169047
Yeah, that's a very good question. Who was already on the moon to film the landing.
Anonymous
No.169058
169062
>>169056
>they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight
If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
Anonymous
No.169059
169061
>>169055
I've been to YouTube. I'm asking where that footage in particular comes from. Idk if it's even part of the same project.
Anonymous
No.169060
>>169056
>The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west.
Russia and China are not the west.
Anonymous
No.169061
169063
>>169059
Dig anon, dig. Surely you'll find out.
Anonymous
No.169062
>>169058
>If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
A public concession it looks to me.
Anonymous
No.169063
169064
>>169061
My digging led me to the conclusion that this is a completely unrelated video. If you have evidence to the contrary, do share.
Anonymous
No.169064
>>169063
Don't give up anon, I know you can do it.
Anonymous
No.169086
File (hide): 4AF9CA62F25C8F699D93D2837DBB73BD-1065505.mp4 (1.0 MB, Resolution:460x480 Length:00:00:20, Its like 1969 again.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Its like 1969 again.mp4
>>169047
>Chandrayaan-3 - More of India's CGI Moon Landing
Anonymous
No.169199
Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.mp4
Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.
Anonymous
No.169200
an object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.mp4
An object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.
Weird.
Anonymous
No.169201
File (hide): D5051F89369C72ABDA6022CFF310FA21-2266818.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:41, indias hoax.mp4) [play once] [loop]
indias hoax.mp4
>>169051
Anonymous
No.169411
169412
11365a0cb7366cf9.jpg

sage
sage
No.169412
169413 169414
>>169411
>look at me! I don't know what exposure is!!!
Anonymous
No.169413
>>169412
Both can be done easily with ISO400 in case you are wondering. This is coming from somefag that entered into a dark room before.
Anonymous
No.169414
169415
>>169412
Ah, also there is no way such amount of light to be reflected by a dark dusty rock.
Anonymous
No.169415
169416
>>169414
>white dust
>not reflective
Anonymous
No.169416
169417
Screenshot_20230925_122004.png
>>169415
Anonymous
No.169417
169418
twilight_sparkle_not_amused_vector_by_homersimpson1983_dfevo21-fullview.png
>>169416
Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes? You think that proves anything that hasn't already been said?
Anonymous
No.169418
169420 169422
523E60B4D6BB18DA6857015F183E340D-205764.png
>>169417
>Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes?
Actually is kinda charity I'm doing with you. By helping you to see what you refuse to see, I'm doing doing the Lord's will. Even if I only get scorn in return.
Anonymous
No.169420
169421
>>169418
I can already see it quite well. I just disagree with your implication.
You can see this stuff on earth. If you look down at a salt flats from the top of the hill, the white plane looks so bright it's blinding to look on that direction, but if you're standing in the middle of the flats it looks normal and unremarkable.
Anonymous
No.169421
169423
>>169420
Globers....
Anonymous
No.169422
>>169418
>God made me do all what I do
Please stop slandering God's good name.
Anonymous
No.169423
>>169421
Nigger...
Anonymous
No.169459
File (hide): FF086548756079B703D8075A599CF319-4199004.mp4 (4.0 MB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:00:47, the_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
the_EDIT.mp4

Anonymous
No.169460
169463
File (hide): 9E736FAD48AC4736A66F070F2D0D97B6-1297383.webm (1.2 MB, Resolution:1080x1080 Length:00:00:10, 1696341091543783.webm) [play once] [loop]
1696341091543783.webm

Anonymous
No.169463
169464
e9958a6.png
>>169460
And what about all the rest? Hah? Those planes are off by thousands of miles.
Anonymous
No.169464
169466
>>169463
How does this explain the above video?
Anonymous
No.169465
File (hide): 139208B43C40FC951EC61284411F41FC-1457321.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:08, 1696340365873372.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1696340365873372.mp4

Anonymous
No.169466
169468
>>169464
It doesn't because you picked the most extreme case to explain tons of geographical anomalies that doesn't add up.
And your video doesn't debunk anything by the way, it only shows that that particular route can take another path.
Anonymous
No.169468
169469
>>169466
>it only shows that that particular route can take another path
Then why would they all have similar durations?
Anonymous
No.169469
169470
Screenshot_20231003_222056.png
>>169467
>Regardless, the flight path is only feasible on a round planet.
Wrong. That particular path is feasible in both realms, this is why the faggot doing the video picked that route.
>>169468
>Then why would they all have similar durations?
Take a look to your own video, the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Anonymous
No.169470
169472
>>169469
>the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Take a long look at it and see how the paths vary greatly in distance on the flat model.
Anonymous
No.169472
169473
large.png
>>169470
>Take a long look
Better yet, let us measure it.
Anonymous
No.169473
169474
>>169472
It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model, and yet the flight path is similar in duration to all the others.
Anonymous
No.169474
169476 169481
>>169473
>It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model,
I presuming you are referring to the arc over the Pacific ocean, then you may ask to the faggot who draw the arc on the map instead of straight line over or alongside the Americas.
Anonymous
No.169476
169477
>>169474
The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl. It passes over Sydney, Aukland, and Santiago, and arrives in it's destination at a similar time to all the other paths.
This picture demonstrates that you can leave Jakarta in any direction and still get to Bogota in an similar amount of time because all the paths are the same distance.
This isn't possible on flat earth: Flights with paths closer to the south pole (or "ice wall") would be drastically longer, as shown in the map.
Anonymous
No.169477
169478 169479 169481
02FD8F02016CCD803797D2F65FA8EC70-637293.png
>>169476
>The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl
And how you know that is IRL? Pilots themselves have discovered that instruments lie to them, more on this soon...
Anonymous
No.169478
169482
>>169477
>implying the pilots are taking three times as long for all three of the other flights just to conceal the true distance of the fourth one
>implying they could do this on a plane with minimum velocity without detouring in a way that would be impossible to conceal
Now you're just moving the goalpost. You lost the argument over the logic, so now you're resorting to denying the flight paths themselves.
You don't believe me, go crowdfund some flights from Jakarta to Bogota and try them yourself.
Anonymous
No.169479
>>169477
Also, the path that moves over Sydney is still twice as long as the next path, even with that ugly black line you drew. Idk what you were trying to prove with that one.
Anonymous
No.169481
>>169474
>draw the arc on the map instead of straight line over or alongside the Americas.
The arc is reflective of the path the plane takes irl.
On a round earth, it's actually a straight line.
But that's still hardly relevant because even if you make the line straight as in >>169477 you'll find that it's still much longer than the other paths.
Anonymous
No.169482
169484
File (hide): F762B59523B9824A1C0017DED2016317-10065780.mp4 (9.6 MB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:04:33, don-t-tell-me-you-believe-the_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
don-t-tell-me-you-believe-the_EDIT.mp4
>>169478
>Now you're just moving the goalpost.
On the contrary, I'm securing their fixed position with proof. Instruments are calibrated to lie to the pilots.
Anonymous
No.169484
169485 169488
>>169482
Then what are those planes really doing so that all of the passengers arrive at similar travel times?
If they took different paths, they wouldn't be hard to spot.
If they moved three times slower, they wouldn't be able to stay in the air.
So what are they doing? You claim that the instruments are lying to pilots, but what's your alternative proposal to what's happening?
Anonymous
No.169485
169486 169489
>>169484
I'm still playing the video, it didn't finish yet but here your are answering back. WOW!
Are you really after the truth? Or you just want to be right?
Anonymous
No.169486
169488
>>169485
I've already seen this video.
It's also not relevant to my question.
Anonymous
No.169488
169490
>>169486
>I've already seen this video.
>>169484
>You claim that the instruments are lying to pilots
If you already watched it, then everything about should be clear to you. ZOG is providing tampered instruments giving false readings.
Anonymous
No.169489
169491
>>169485
You still haven't explained how planes are able to fly in four different directions with those flight paths, and arrive in similar travel times for what would be wildly different distance on flat earth, but similar distance on round earth.
You can claim the pilots had their equipment like to them, but that doesn't explain how all those planes are getting there in the same amount of time.
Anonymous
No.169490
>>169488
I'm not contesting that instruments could lie to pilots. I'm asking you how the planes are able to arrive at their destination from three different directions in the same travel time.
You can't just fly a plane at a third of its cruising speed: it will crash.
Anonymous
No.169491
169492 169493
742.jpg
>>169489
>You still haven't explained how planes are able to fly in four different directions with those flight paths, and arrive in similar travel times for what would be wildly different distance on flat earth, but similar distance on round earth.
It is right in front of your eyes. Get an orange and use a tailor measure tape, no matter from where choose to measure, the diametric opposite side will be at the same exact distance.
WOW!
Anonymous
No.169492
169494
>>169491
Yeah, that works on a sphere; it does not work on a circle. You can clearly see on the chart that the path over Sydney is longer on the flat model, because it runs closer to the "ice wall" and would thus be much longer on flat earth.
Anonymous
No.169493
>>169491
>orange
An orange is a sphere.
Anonymous
No.169494
169495
>>169492
Make it easy for everyponer, get the times and the links to check what you claim is true and not a wild fantasy.
Anonymous
No.169495
169496 169497 169498
>>169494
>Jakarta–Istanbul–Bogota: 12h 0m + 13h 45m = 25.75 hours
>Jakarta–Hong Kong–New York–Bogota: 5h 5m + 16h 0m + 5h 42m = 26.783 hours
>Jakarta–Tokyo–Houston–Bogota: 7h 35m + 12h 5m + 4h 55m = 24.583 hours
>Jakarta–Sydney–Auckland–Santiago–Bogota: 6h 55m + 3h 5m + 11h 0m + 6h 14m = 27.23 hours
All these flights vary by only a couple hours, when on flat earth the path over Sydney should take 2-3 times as long because of it's southernmost route.
Anonymous
No.169496
169499
erfx.jpg
>>169495
Ahem. You will need a bit more than that.
Anonymous
No.169497
169498
>>169495
Plug it into the air miles calculator if you will
https://www.airmilescalculator.com/distance/bog-to-cgk/

On a flat earth, the further you go from the pole, the greater the distance around the earth will be. It's a radius/circumference thing. That's not happening here over Sydney. They're flying straight towards the antipodal point, just like a tailor's tape around an orange, that tailor's tape giving similar measurements for the other three flight paths.
Anonymous
No.169498
169499 169501
>>169497
>On a flat earth
>It's a radius/circumference thing
You've got the spaces flipped. On flat Earth we are talking about straight lines on a flat plane.
>>169495
Links?
Anonymous
No.169499
>>169496
I've been doing this for over an hour. I need to go to bed. Fiddle with the link below. It shouldn't be hard to find other links, because the Jakarta-Bogota flight is famously the longest flight on earth (being on exact other side of the world, no matter what direction you fly in). In all cases, and all paths, the flights vary by ~3 hours at most.
>>169498
>straight lines on a flat plane
An ice ring has a circumference.
In either case, you could still see that the path was longer. It was STILL twice as even when you drew that straight black line through it.
I provided a link.

Pro-tip: you were onto something with the tape measure and orange analogy. Think a bit longer about the shape of an orange.
Anonymous
No.169501
>>169498
All this time, you've been arguing for a round, circular earth. Idk what shape it would be if not a circle were it still surrounded by an ice ring.
The earth you described would have its circumference be 78142.78 miles of "ice ring".
Anonymous
No.169672
Did y'all like the partial solar eclipse the other day? Yesterday at noonish, my time? You know the collander trick, right? You grab a collander and hold it about waist-high and line it so the sunlight travels through the holes with least friction. This will project the shape of the sun on the ground, so you dont burn your retinas.

So this one was a partial solar eclipse. The sun never looked mpre than like the moon from castlevania; cool as shit, but not what you WANNA see.
Well.
It just so happens, THAT is gonna happen on April 8th 2024; right ~ 6 mos from now.
A full and total solar eclipse, with the mass darkening of the sky and the full ring of fire visible aloft.

And for me, its gonna peak at... 1:37
13:37, if using....

Anyway, you wanna know why this is significant?
Because if you understand all the references Ive made, you would know that none of this is possible on a flat earth.
Anonymous
No.169746
169747
ef475ee71d3fa335.jpeg
>oxygen
I don't tell me it is because the NASA hacks used more pressure to fit more gas because both tanks contain liquid oxygen and liquid is for practical purposes incompressible.
Anonymous
No.169747
169758
>>169746
Those suits only had 6 hours of oxygen, iirc. Idk where the 22 hours thing comes from. I could be mistaken though; where did you find this information?
If you look closer, the suit and it's backup pack have significantly more volume than the driver's tanks. Oxygen/Nitrogen balance probably plays a role, as nitrogen saturation is a factor to keep divers from dying from the bends, but I would have to look it up first. Diving is also a much more oxygen-intensive task than walking in microgravity.
The Apollo 11 suits are also airtight, unlike the diver's gear which loses air with every breath in the form of bubbles. Humans don't absorb 100% of the oxygen they inhale, so as I gather the space suit has a longer life by refiltering exhaled air and sealing CO2 away.
Anonymous
No.169749
169754
>he doesnt want to comment on the eclipse
Anonymous
No.169754
169755
>>169749
>the eclipse
Wasn't that post sagged?
Anonymous
No.169755
169914
>>169754
What does that have to do with it?
Anonymous
No.169758
169759
evidence-source-proof-look-up-tiny-computer-in-your-hand.jpg
>>169747
>I could be mistaken though; where did you find this information?
Anonymous
No.169759
169760
>>169758
I tried reverse-image searching. It didn't work. Where did you get the pic?
When I looked it up, I saw that it is in fact only 6 hours of oxygen.
Anonymous
No.169760
169762
>>169759
>I tried reverse-image searching. It didn't work
Of course it won't work. You dump your dumb phone and get a real computer to search for oxygen tanks.
Anonymous
No.169762
169763 169766
>>169760
I was asking about where you got the meme. I have the oxygen tank info right in front of me on my computer. All sources I see say six hours.
Anonymous
No.169763
169765
>>169762
Racists on the internet gave it to me.
Anonymous
No.169765
>>169763
Well, it looks like they were mistaken though.
Of course 22 hours doesn't make sense, because that's not what it was. They did not walk on the moon for anywhere close to 22 hours. It was made for 6 hours.
Anonymous
No.169766
169770
>>169762
>I have the oxygen tank info right in front of me on my computer.
Source???
Anonymous
No.169768
169771
TYSON.png
Talking about soooorces.
Most globers listen to this dumb nigger Tyson and agree he is smart. LOL
Anonymous
No.169770
169780
ALSJ-FlightPLSS.pdf
>>169766
This is public domain information, ffs.
The 22 hours thing was an ass pull. I cannot find anyone who's ever claimed the suit has 22 hours of oxygen, and considering the fact that you won't say where you got it, you can't either.
Anonymous
No.169771
>>169768
>Most globers listen to this dumb nigger Tyson and agree he is smart
Barely anyone thinks that. Even other astrophysicists think he's an egotistical hack. Faggot celebrity-scientist.
Anonymous
No.169780
169803
DEX8_DDWAAAjH7Z.jpg
Untitled.jpg
>>169770
That PDF is about the technology used for life support in a close system and it does not apply to the meme which is specifically about gas volume/hour endurance.
It is very simple, so many cubic feet of oxygen can keep alive a human so many hours. It is like a fuel calculus, so much fuel, so many miles.
Anonymous
No.169782
169785
>>169779
The PDF is about the life support system, which includes how much oxygen the tank can provide.
It is able to go for 6 hours instead of two for multiple reasons including but not limited to the fact that it doesn't need to account for nitrogen saturated bends, it's visibly larger than a single diving tank or pair of tanks, and the fact that it doesn't waste oxygen by expelling it in bubbles every time a breath is taken like the diver does.
Anonymous
No.169785
169786
>>169782
Dude, that might work. and with a lot of limits, in a submarine where size and weight are allowed, not on the back of a man.
Anonymous
No.169786
>>169785
The designer expressed regret for not being able to make it last that long without increasing the volume of the suit, but luckily, equipment weighs a lot less on the moon.
Besides, these men were the fittest America had to offer. U.S. soldiers periodically carry heavier loads on their backs.
Anonymous
No.169792
169794
I believe the meme he shared is confusing aggregate time with the walk time. Google brings up that:
"The moonwalks conducted by American astronauts lasted for 20 hours and 14 minutes. During the Apollo 17 mission, astronauts Armstrong and Aldrin spent 21 hours and 36 minutes on the lunar surface. In total, American astronauts have spent 3 days, 8 hours, 22 minutes and 26 seconds walking on the moon."

This matches the meme time, which quite purposely confused the time when each individual walk before returning to pick up a new supply was:
"walked around for about two and a half hours"

In other words, their big ass backpack allowed for double the time of an average dive tank. You can tell in the image that those tanks don't match the size of the backpack, nor match the weight because you need to remain mobile under water while on the moon, you can just walk and jump.

You have been lied to. Next time, don't believe random fucking strangers on the internet giving you shit tier memes.
Anonymous
No.169794
169795
pGPWn7I.gif
>>169792
>Next time, don't believe random fucking strangers on the internet giving you shit tier memes.
Those hideous racists...
Anonymous
No.169795
169797
>>169794
I didn't say anything about them being racists. I said they lied to you because they are strangers giving you shit memes. Nice try at deflection.
Anonymous
No.169797
169798 169799
>>169795
>I said they lied to you because they are strangers giving you shit memes.
Did you ever consider that memes can be homemade?
Anonymous
No.169798
>>169797
Exactly my point. Seeing as they made them at home and they gave you the wrong number on your meme for you to believe, then you were lied to.

Unless you are speaking to it being homemade as in you made it yourself, in which case you took the wrong fucking number, dumbass.
Anonymous
No.169799
169800
>>169797
That's no excuse for being shit-tier and inaccurate. Even at face value the meme made no sense, and the maker either did zero actual research or made it inaccurate on purpose.
And then you went and reposted it without checking, and claimed it proved your point, leaving the rest of us to check for you and call out that it's nonsense. Nice move.
Anonymous
No.169800
169801 169802
>>169799
>Even at face value the meme made no sense
It makes totally sense, even with all the mentally gymnastics cannot be beaten, IMO.
Anonymous
No.169801
>>169800
It makes no sense because nobody has ever claimed that the life support system works for 22 hours, except for the brainlet who made this meme.
Anonymous
No.169802
169803
>>169800
So, are you admitting to lying purposely for propaganda?
Anonymous
No.169803
169804 169808 169857
>>169802
>So, are you admitting to lying purposely for propaganda?
WOW that's a bold lie. By refusing to acknowledge the tank sizes >>169780 you are a dishonest chump.
Anonymous
No.169804
169806
>>169803
The meme says 22 hours. You lied. You are suggesting you made the meme yourself or comes from trusted sources. It is proven to be a lie because it was 2.5 hours.
Anonymous
No.169806
169807 169811 169858 170153
>>169804
>The meme says 22 hours. You lied.
You lie. According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours. If they replenished their air supply, is not proven.
Anonymous
No.169807
169809
>>169806
https://youtu.be/S7Cl1hRMPA8?feature=shared
The meme says 22 hours. The sources said 22 is aggregate. Are you telling me that they didn't sleep at all during the mission?
Anonymous
No.169808
>>169803
The life support system is visibly bigger than the two tanks in your stupid meme: the tank is literally bigger.
It also, again, doesn't need to account for bends, and it is doesn't waste oxygen by bubbling it away.

It's ridiculous for a suit to last 22 hours, but one being designed to last for six hours is well within the realm of possibility for all of the reasons described above. Just the fact that the suit is a closed system alone means it's drastically more air-efficient than the civilian diver's tank.
Also, they didn't even use it for the full 6 hours, they did it for 2.5 hours. 6 hours is it's absolute maximum. Even most diving tanks can actually go for longer than their labelling recommends, but only retards would push the limit when their brain tissue is on the line. They made a suit that was more than twice the capacity they needed because they had to account for things going wrong and the astronauts somehow being delayed on their path back to the vessel.
Anonymous
No.169809
169810 169813
>>169807
>Are you telling me that they didn't sleep at all during the mission?
Sleeping does not stops breathing. Just saying.
Anonymous
No.169810
>>169809
https://youtu.be/vDMwDT6BhhE?feature=shared
Anonymous
No.169811
>>169806
>You lie. According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
Where and when has NASA ever said this? It's not in any of their documentation or their announcements.
Anonymous
No.169813
>>169809
They weren't wearing the suits while they slept, idiot. They slept aboard the vessel, which had more than enough Oxygen.
Anonymous
No.169857
>>169803
>refusing to acknowledge the tank sizes
We all said the tank on the suit is visibly bigger. You can see that it's bigger.
Anonymous
No.169858
>>169806
>According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
[Citation needed]
Anonymous
No.169914
169926 169940
>>169755
You simply get as much attention as you intended to raise. By saging, that means nothing at all.
Anonymous
No.169926
>>169914
Pretty much this.
Anonymous
No.169940
169985
>>169914
Then why are you replying now?
Anonymous
No.169954
Heres a quick short, so you wont have missed out
https://youtube.com/shorts/cu4tYxZA0g4?si=ke3za4YYvg579u2g
Anonymous
No.169985
170134
>>169940
Just to let you know. You should be happier anon.
Anonymous
No.170134
170135
>>169985
I'm not the same guy.
Anonymous
No.170135
170136
>>170134
And I'm not OP. Checkmate fagget.
Anonymous
No.170136
>>170135
Checkmate what? What's your point?
OP
No.170137
170138 170141 170154
Flat-Earth-Memes-22-copy.jpg
Hello anons.
Anonymous
No.170138
>>170137
What's the bottom photo from?
Anonymous
No.170139
170140 170141
smallprototy.jpg
Privately owned high altitude aerostatic balloon.
Anonymous
No.170140
>>170139
Which one?
I'm trying to look it up.
Anonymous
No.170141
170142
modus-operandi.jpg
>>170137
It's pretty easy to cut photos like this to make them appear flat. It doesn't help that the lower photo is so grainy; almost as it it were cut from a larger image.
Of course, we could settle this right away if we had the name of the balloon and the date this photo was taken.
>>170139
Privately owned by who?
Anonymous
No.170142
170143 170144 170145 170148
>>170141
>It's pretty easy to cut photos like this to make them appear flat
You tell me. For decades the masons have been using eyefish lenses and everybody swallowed the hoax.
Anonymous
No.170143
fisheye-video.jpg
little-piggy.jpg
high-altitude-balloon.jpg
fisheye-makes-flat.jpg
overdefishing.jpg
>>170142
More like the opposite. Defishing high altitude photos make them appear flat. Give me a named example of a balloon and I'll show it to you.
Anonymous
No.170144
>>170142
What about the image you posted though? How do you know there wasn't any fisheye involved?
Anonymous
No.170145
170146 170147
>>170142
Exactly, funny how globers are only so skeptic when it come to alternative true evidence.
Anonymous
No.170146
170149 170535
>>170145
About that whole eclipse thing,....
Anonymous
No.170147
>>170145
>true evidence
You've still yet to give the name of the balloon, or any single example we can analyze.
Anonymous
No.170148
>>170142
Does that include the supposed privately-owned high altitude balloon that you posted?
Anonymous
No.170149
170150 170535
>>170146
I, too, am interested in what flat earthers have to say about the ring of fire eclipse.
Anonymous
No.170150
>>170149
Just wait until april. Many may have missed the last one, but they WONT miss this one
No doubt itll be factored into the ramping WW3 talking points,... ugh, its gonna get spicy
Anonymous
No.170152
2405626__safe_artist-colon-chopchopguy_editor-colon-smithers888_princess+celestia_princess+luna_alicorn_pony_1000+hours+in+imagemagick_always+has+been_cake_cake.png

Anonymous
No.170153
>>169806
>According to NASA, its actors in space costumes were there for 22 hours.
I haven't found NASA saying this anywhere. You must be mistaken.
Anonymous
No.170154
>>170137
>List 25 filename
Really? That's where you get this crap?
Anonymous
No.170181
170182
globers.jpg
Globers in this thread.
Anonymous
No.170182
170535
>>170181
Mhm, about that whole 'eclipse' thingy
Anonymous
No.170185
170188 170192
chunk of the moon appears to be orbiting near Earth.jpg
File (hide): B65650C4B6972D85905A9EDBE6052673-1890222.mp4 (1.8 MB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:01:11, Chunk Of Moon Falls Off - NASA Nonsense.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Chunk Of Moon Falls Off - NASA Nonsense.mp4
Chunk of the moon appears to be orbiting near Earth.
Anonymous
No.170186
170187
film.png
To the globers.
Anonymous
No.170187
170193
>>170186
What's so special about this particular pic?
Also, this wasn't filmed. It was a photograph. The videos are much lower quality because video tech wasn't as developed back then.
Anonymous
No.170188
170193
>>170185
>they're saying a piece of the moon just fell off
It didn't "just fall off". It's been there for a century.
>two years ago they said the same.
>second time in two years
The asteroid was named as a quasi-satellite in 2016, a study in 2021 analyzed it's material composition, and a recent study graphed it's current orbit and extrapolated it's previous orbit. This retard didn't even read the articles he's ridiculing, because he's claiming that NASA said two things happened when in fact both articles are referring to the same fucking rock.
It was two years ago (2021) that a study was done analyzing the light reflecting off of the asteroid and concluding that it had the same substance composition as the moon, but weren't sure how a lunar object would
The new study is based on a computer simulation that graphs the asteroids orbit, explaining how Kamoʻoalewa attained such a peculiar orbit bouncing between the earth and Sun's gravity.

Both studies were referring to the same rock, the rock that has been circling for decades. Nobody ever claimed that a piece of the moon "fell off" of it two years in a row, unlike what this wigger is saying.

Do you even research this shit before posting it?
Anonymous
No.170192
170193
>>170185
>NASA just announced
Ffs, they did not "just announce" it. The recent announcement was publishing a simulation-based study about it's historical orbit and a prediction for how long it will start near earth.
Anonymous
No.170193
170194
>>170187
>>170188
>>170192
Freemason spokesperson replays...
Anonymous
No.170194
170195
>>170193
>ad homenim
Are you going to refute the argument, or was what I said correct?
Anonymous
No.170195
170200 170535
>>170194
You know he wont, because it is.
Still waiting on that whole eclipse thing not to mention the ships over the horizon thing
But staff is okay with this cuz it doesnt hilight (and yet it does) their malfeasance
Anonymous
No.170200
170535
>>170195
He won't answer about the eclipse because he's embarrassed that he can't.
Anonymous
No.170212
170213
MEDIA MUSK91b276A.jpeg

Anonymous
No.170213
170216
>>170212
Starlink is going pretty well for him. That satellite Internet is really taking off.
Elon owns half of the satellites orbiting the earth right now. It's come to the point where the U.S. military had to buy their own Starlink system for Ukraine so that Elon wouldn't be able to turn it off.
Anonymous
No.170216
170217
>>170213
>Starlink is going pretty well for him. That satellite Internet is really taking off.
A hint.
Neither Starlink or any satellite service does work in the mountains away from populated regions nor in the middle of the ocean. And when actually and intermittently works is because there is a balloon floating at 30km high relaying the signal.
Anonymous
No.170217
170218
>>170216
>Neither Starlink or any satellite service does work in the mountains
Weren't they using Starlink terminals out in the mountains of Morocco after that earthquake recently?
The biggest benefit of Starlink is that it works even in remote areas and where infrastructure has gone to shit.
>ocean
Yes it does. It has almost complete coverage over all the world's oceans. They use it on ships all of the time.
Anonymous
No.170218
170219
>>170217
>It has almost complete coverage over all the world's oceans.
Go below the Ecuator parallel and see how it works, the further you sail to the south, the less functional is.
Anonymous
No.170219
170221
>>170218
They were it to track ships having to go around the horn of Africa in real time during that Suez canal fiasco. It works perfectly fine down south.
Where are you getting this?
Anonymous
No.170221
170222
>>170219
>Where are you getting this?
First hand experience sailing the Cabo the Hornos, where the world ends before reaching Antartica. This have been described by me like a thousand posts above.
Anonymous
No.170222
170223
>>170221
You tried using Starlink there? What year was this?
Anonymous
No.170223
170224
>>170222
>What year was this?
I won't dox myself neither my boat. Sorry.
Anonymous
No.170224
170225 170226
>>170223
Well, if it was more than three years, that's not really relevant, because most Starlink satellites have gone up very recently.
>dox yourself
>implying a boat among tens thousands sailing on a particular year is doxxable
Anonymous
No.170225
170227 170228
>>170224
>because most Starlink satellites have gone up very recently.
Yeah, but satellital service is way before Musk's hoax.
Anonymous
No.170226
>>170224
>implying a boat among tens thousands sailing on a particular year is doxxable
The Cabo the Hornos is a veeeeeeeeeery special route where no many adventure into. Just yandex it.
Anonymous
No.170227
>>170225
General satellite service isn't Starlink internet. Starlink has proven to be reliable all over the ocean, so sailors can shitpost from anywhere on the seas.
And as I said before, the number of satellites has doubled in the past few years.
Anonymous
No.170228
170229
>>170225
>hoax
Considering how lucrative and influential satellite internet is proving to be, it wouldn't even matter if it were made of a bunch of balloons or dangling on strings glued to Ymir's skull. Whatever it's made of, Starlink is an incredibly promising technology.
Anonymous
No.170229
170230
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
>>170228
>Starlink is an incredibly promising technology.
I would say a balloon technology rebranded as satellital.
Anonymous
No.170230
170231
>>170229
>pics
These aren't Starlink terminals though?
Pic 1 is from a test flight for a silly sunlight-blocking technology to fight climate change in Sweden. It was cancelled due to being stupid
Pic 2-3 are pics of NASA's launch of the Compton Spectrometer.

None of this has anything to do with Starlink.
Anonymous
No.170231
170233
>>170230
>None of this has anything to do with Starlink.
Of course not. You really expect Mr Musk to show us commercial secrets? But the balloon technique stands.
Anonymous
No.170233
170235
>>170231
>But the balloon technique stands
Based on what?
We could've had satellite Internet a lot earlier if balloons were reliable satellites.
Starlink took off when spaceX developed a method to recover rockets so that the equipment for putting satellites in orbit wasn't only disposable.
Anonymous
No.170235
170236 170238
>>170233
>We could've had satellite Internet a lot earlier if balloons were reliable satellites.
Exactly, balloons are so effective as the wind currents that take them away, that's the reason why a continuous launching rate of balloons are necessary to fake satellites and keep an apparently stable communication link.
Anonymous
No.170236
170237 170238
>>170235
Except balloons also deflate over time at a rate that makes them unreliable for permanent infrastructure.
>continuous launching rate of balloons are necessary to fake satellites and keep an apparently stable communication link
Oh, hahaha, just continuously keep launching $250,000 satellites that fall into the sea when their balloons pop. That's totally a sustainable business model.
Anonymous
No.170237
170238
>>170236
>$250,000 satellites that fall into the sea when their balloons pop. That's totally a sustainable business model.
Dude, even Amazon was not a sustainable model for years and I'm not sure is getting even today. All these private enterprises would never survive a year without government contracts and assistance. You see, while claiming to be a companies in a free market environment, reality is that they survive because government centralized communism.
Anonymous
No.170238
170239
>>170235
>>170236
It would cost $15,000,000,000 per day to continuously replace all Starlink satellites without communications loss, and that's just considering the manufacturing, not the salaries of the technicians or the cost of launching balloons.
>>170237
You seriously think Elon is spending more than fifteen billion dollars per day to continuously replace over five thousand satellites on weather balloons that cost two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and only last for two hours each?
Anonymous
No.170239
170240 170242
>>170238
>You seriously think Elon is spending more than fifteen billion dollars per day to continuously replace over five thousand satellites
>5,000 satellites
You seriously think Elon is telling you the truth? KEK
Anonymous
No.170240
170241
>>170239
Okay, tell me what it would cost then.
Anonymous
No.170241
>>170240
No idea and it actually is not important because is the same case than Google. The government is interested in keeping functioning at any cost, if it makes profit is good, and if not injections of capital will keep it afloat.
Anonymous
No.170242
170243
>>170239
How would Starlink possibly work if there weren't that many satellites? You think this is possible with only a few satellites? This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
Anonymous
No.170243
170244
>>170242
>This is a fuckload of data we're talking about.
It is not. 97% of all internet traffic goes through submarine cables and the rest is distributed between land fiber optics and airborne relays.
Anonymous
No.170244
170245
>>170243
Except all of that has to be accessible through the satellite if Starlink is supposed to be useful for anything, so it does indeed have to go through the satellite.

The only reason Starlink works is because there's so many of them, and there's that many of them because SpaceX recovers the rockets for reuse.
Anonymous
No.170245
170246
>>170244
>so it does indeed have to go through the satellite
>satellite
Airborne relays.
Anonymous
No.170246
170247
>>170245
Weather balloons only last two hours.
To have continuous connection, you'd have to replace each of them 12 times a day.
Anonymous
No.170247
>>170246
>Weather balloons only last two hours.
Non-sense. Think about many days.
Anonymous
No.170372
170373 170374
zdfv.png
For those in the known.
>The current solar cycle is, indeed, a circle. Because the sun revolves in a circle, that is also the shape of the ice wall that exists at our boundaries.
>The firmament barrier may be much larger than this, though, according to the 'moon map' - the image of the Earth we see projected on the moon.
>On the moon map, we see many other, HUGE pieces of land - and resources - outside our solar cycle, and the ice wall.
Anonymous
No.170373
170375 170377 170378
33e4da529e503d23271c46b039d08b21fcaaef67_00.jpg
>>170372
I've heard of Dark Continent theory. It's basically the Flat Earther's equivalent to Hollow Earth theory: it would be really amazing if it were true, but there's little evidence for it (even in context of Flat Earth cosmology). The concept of a terrestrial hidden world outside the known boundaries of our own with it's own lands and resources and unexplored frontiers is a cool idea, although not much supporting it.
I've seen Dark Continent theory in referenced in a lot of fantasy world-building. One example would be the Magi manga (although it has a spherical earth, it's still the same concept). It's a fun trope, for the reasons above. I would recommend it for fantasy world-builders interested in making a final frontier who's existence tells a story about the meaning of the world's creation, being in close proximity to the great rift of creation, perhaps even the path to an ancient, dead world from eons before this land was formed, or an inverted world unlike our own, perhaps even the realm of the dead, or the home of our ancestors.
The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north, and a world within a world, Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own, a world outside our world.

In my own fantasy pony worldbuilding, I considered the idea of the Dark Continent being the icy frontier of the world being a rugged and untamable place, where providence withers, reality breaks down, and the wendigos rule the frigid edges of disharmony. I based it on the warning sign in The Witcher III: "You've reached the edge of the world! Only devils roam here! Turn back!". I love the trope of the edges of reality being dark and sinister places inhabited by nameless horrors, but still worlds in and of themselves.

Where did you quote that greentext from? I would like to read more about this supposed "moon map". All I find is maps of the cartography of the moon itself. I know the moon is reflective, but I didn't think it was reflective enough to reflect a mirror-like image of earth.
Anonymous
No.170374
>>170372
This picture appears to be from a book. What's it from?
Anonymous
No.170375
170376
>>170373
Okay, I did some research on the "moon map" thing. It's the suggestion that the moon is actually a map/reflection/projection of the earth.

Overall, I have to say, I disagree. Not only do the craters of the moon not really match the geography of the earth (although they could look vaguely similar if you squint), the moon's craters are also observable in greater detail with medieval-era telescopes, and while observing the moon shows that it indeed does have mountains, pits, and valleys, they don't really match up with the geography of the world.
To kill time, I decided to check out if anyone decided to map out the moon's craters in detail and compare them to the earth, but all I found was vague outlines drawn with an excess of wishful thinking.

Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
Anonymous
No.170376
170379
>>170375
>Cool idea, but it doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.
At less... you try to match the map with the undersea geology, then suddenly it makes sense.
Anonymous
No.170377
>>170373
>Dark Continent theory depicts a dark and loathsome wasteland which encompasses our own
Did you know that there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland? If so, it may be that there is at least other sun circling the dome in a wider ring.
Anonymous
No.170378
>>170373
>The trope is, in many ways, like an inversion of hyperborean hollow earth theory. Where Hyperborea depicts a paradise in the north
A reminder that the north is also guarded by men with weapons and no one is allowed to travel there.
Anonymous
No.170379
170380 170522
>>170376
Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>there is some myths about sunny warm lands beyond the frozen wasteland?
Of course I know. I just referenced Hyperborea.
>no one is allowed
That's not really true at all. People go there all of the time. You can schedule holiday trips there. Multiple shipping routes go there too.
Anonymous
No.170380
170522
>>170379
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
Anonymous
No.170385
170386
File (hide): 62ABCFF5C60405F57E7A67190FE21619-1450722.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:404x720 Length:00:00:41, conste.mp4) [play once] [loop]
conste.mp4
Our constellations have never changed, and our Earth clock has never changed.
This is a small clip from >>148621
Anonymous
No.170386
>>170385
>Our constellations have never changed
Our constellations have demonstrably changed, since Ancient Egypt.
>If everything was moving we'd see different things in the sky
We've had this exact conversation before. It was explained. Scroll up.
Why are you posting redundant arguments? Why are you repeating yourself? Did you just forget?
Anonymous
No.170387
170388
>>165136
Somewhere around here. You've brought this up before. Everypony remembers.
Anonymous
No.170388
170389 170392 170398
7997.png
>>170387
>You've brought this up before. Everypony remembers.
Yeah, and yet you still insist in your misinterpretation because you have no clue what you are talking about. If your ball is flipping around in a allegedly universe, then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position.
Anonymous
No.170389
170391
>>170388
>then is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
How is that impossible?

And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record.
Anonymous
No.170391
170392 170396
>>170389
>And again, you're just repeating yourself, with the same arguments you've already made in this thread, like a broken record
No U.
I have a better idea, instead of talking about something you know nothing about, why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
Anonymous
No.170392
170393 170394 170395
main-qimg-4baef238de5df5096a05494475cc9501.gif
>>170388
>is impossible to have any periodicity in stars' position
Untrue. The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them. The universe is so enormously vast that the amount the earth has moved in the history of humanity has made very little difference in terms of positions of the nearest stars.
>>170391
>why you don't plot the earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting and then find out where the stars are?
Pic related
There is an entire field of science devoted to tracking the position of the earth relative to the nearest celestial bodies.
Anonymous
No.170393
>>170392
Wrong pic
Anonymous
No.170394
>>170392
Oooooh. I'm impressed, you brought stuff.
Anonymous
No.170395
170397
>>170392
>The stars have consistent positions because in the grand scheme of things we're not actually getting very much closer to any of them.
Correct. This realm is fixed.
Anonymous
No.170396
170399
>>170391
>earth trajectory in a heliocentric setting
Are you asking for the trajectory of the Earth's or it around the sun, or the trajectory of the sun itself (and thus also the moon) around the center of the milky way?
Anonymous
No.170397
170401
>>170395
>This realm is fixed
If by that you mean the universe is only so big, then sure.
Anonymous
No.170398
170400
>>170388
We literally refuted that argument 2 years ago.
Anonymous
No.170399
>>170396
Well, there are a lot simultaneous translations for a ball in a vacuum. Self spinning, relative to the sun, relative the cosmos. Then you may consider all of them.
Anonymous
No.170400
170402
>>170398
>We
Who are (we)?
Anonymous
No.170401
>>170397
>the universe
The dome.
Anonymous
No.170402
170403
>>170400
Me, and the 3-4 other guys who answered your point about Polaris.
Anonymous
No.170403
170404
>>170402
I didn't know so many globers were pounding this thread.
Anonymous
No.170404
170405
>>170403
Most of them got bored and left.
>pounding this threa
If you make a thread and bump it periodically, people are going to respond.
Anonymous
No.170405
>>170404
>Most of them got bored and left.
Not bad, not bad. Frustration is not easy to tolerate.
Anonymous
No.170432
170435
1915928__explicit_artist-colon-nevobaster_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_absurd+resolution_anatomically+correct_anus_beautiful_butt_castle_casual+nudity_crown_c.png
heliocentrism is bullshit anons, theres no more reason to keep defending the imaginations of freemasons
Anonymous
No.170435
170466
1591080__explicit_artist-colon-selenophile_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_g4_absurd+resolution_adorasexy_alternate+hairstyle_anatomically+correct_anus_blushing_.jpg
2501724__explicit_alternate+version_artist-colon-evomanaphy_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_both+cutie+marks_butt_butt+blush_clitoris_d.jpg
2217533__explicit_artist-colon-chigusa_derpibooru+exclusive_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_butt_clitoris_female_large+butt_looking+at+.jpg
1437263__explicit_artist-colon-chigusa_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_ass_beautiful_butt_clitoris_crown_cutie+mark_dock_ethereal+mane_.jpg
2708714__explicit_artist-colon-redvais_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anatomically+correct_anus_bed_bedroom+eyes_butt_clitoris_cloud_crown_dark+genitals_dock_fe.png
>>170432
The world revolves around Tia's giant ass: this is the true nature of heliocentrism. The earth (round) revolves around our sun, and the sun (projection of Celestia's holy plot) rises above Equestria (flat) when Tia claps her cheeks in the morning. Masons created both flat-earthers and general astrology to distract us from from the TRUTH about the cosmos, that Equestria is right beside us on the other side of the sun.
Embrace two-cheek theory.
OP
No.170453
eclipse.png
>SOLAR ECLIPSE BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA - (1:20 long)
>Thursday, July 2, 2019 from a roof of a building in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcOgqT-Pu0U
Anonymous
No.170466
170523
985416__explicit_artist-colon-shepherd0821_princess+celestia_alicorn_pony_anus_areola_big+crotchboobs_big+nipples_butt_clitoris_crotchboobs_dock_female_hair+ov.jpg
>>170435
thats cute but we all know the earth doesnt move
Anonymous
No.170522
Selenetical Physics Vol. 1 - An Exercise in Visual Pattern Recognition - (POSTER).png
Selenetical Physics Vol. 2 - Reflections on the Electric Field - (POSTER).png
>>170379
>Nah, I considered that. There doesn't seem to be any exact match with abovesea geography.
>>170380
>Hang on. I saw a good presentation but long and geometrically convoluted, but kinda a geographical match nevertheless.
I was looking for the formal long presentation/lecture showing and explaining the moon/earth matches but I'm unable to find it for the time being. However I found the closest video on the subject, it has not the rigorous scientific content of the first one but it is close enough. This takes the moon map to a new level.

>Selenetical Physics Vol. 1: An Exercise in Visual Pattern Recognition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtM97zuMrfE
and
>Selenetical Physics Vol. 2: Reflections on the Electric Field
>Intro to the electric circuit of the moon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL1bQS3kdk0
Anonymous
No.170523
170529
>>170466
Equestria doesn't move. The earth does.
Anonymous
No.170529
170530
globers.jpeg
>>170523
>The earth does.
No.
Anonymous
No.170530
170533
>>170529
>unironically reposting satire
Anonymous
No.170533
>>170530
>satire
Well, some globetard photoshopped Manhattan to make it look on a ball.
Anonymous
No.170535
File (hide): C4DC0EDA0F9CF31FBEE99CF86F3BDC98-9896601.mp4 (9.4 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:04:05, Dave Weiss discusses solar eclipses.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Dave Weiss discusses solar eclipses.mp4
>>170146
>>170149
>>170182
>>170195
>>170200
>solar eclipse
I doubt you globers will ever entertain the idea of a Black Sun.
Anonymous
No.170537
170538 170540
flat.png
All proofs that Earth is a spinning ball rely on un-testable claims.
Anonymous
No.170538
170539
>>170537
This says "X is contrary" a lot, but doesn't provide any reasons why/how, or even examples.
Anonymous
No.170539
170540 170544 170549
>>170538
>but doesn't provide any reasons why/how, or even examples
It is meme. What you want is contained in tons of videos from multiple creators. I suggest you may begin with Eric Dubay's ones.
Anonymous
No.170540
170541
ULTE46B3F5313179DC04B147D86486610DB-81553.jpg
>>170537
>>170539
>A list
>A meme
Okay haha clown world. This isn't something like E. It's not deep fried. It's not quadruple ironic.
Just a list. Anyone can make a list.
Normies can make a fucking list. They do it too!
What changes some bullshit into a meme is quite simple.
I'd share it but I have a hunch I've shared it before.
yogurt
It's in the name
If you're in you're in
Consider the humble meme farmer.
Anonymous
No.170541
170551
Cope.jpg
>>170540
Anonymous
No.170543
grzdrxgxhxhzdgbzdfgbzdgzsdgvzds.jpg
Screenshot_20231116_050759.png
y3wHO9M.gif
>Pastor Greg Locke - Flat Earth melt down # 3 - Debate Dec 2nd Nashville TN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T84zZs5nzc
This has got enormous entertainment value. The protestant self-righteous preacher, with guitars included in his church, suffers a nervous breakdown on The Bible passages describing this realm as being a plane.
Anonymous
No.170544
170545
>>170539
>It is meme
A bad meme. Contributes nothing to the conversation.
Anonymous
No.170545
170546 170551
>>170544
>A bad meme
An excellent one. It points straight to incongruencies in the heliocentric model.
Anonymous
No.170546
170547
>>170545
A good meme would be an infographic. This is just an list of unsupported opinions.
Anonymous
No.170547
170548
>>170546
>unsupported opinions
How so?
Anonymous
No.170548
170549
>>170547
It just says "evidence is contrary" on multiple points, but doesn't even bother to say how, summarize it, or even direct the reader to a "true" source where they could find it themselves.
Anonymous
No.170549
170550
the-x-fillies.png
>>170548
It has been already answered at >>170539
The Truth is Out There.
Anonymous
No.170550
>>170549
Still a shit meme
Anonymous
No.170551
170552
1584940817204-4.png
A5B27F8EB867CD762570BDDEDF4FCCAF-276769.png
>>170541
>>170545
Okay Mr List a meme.
You keep thinking it's the bees knees, and don't wonder at all why many think your choice in memes is extremely poor.
I'm sure every single person in the world agrees with your statement and if they don't they're obviously not you.
Anonymous
No.170552
170554
picture-09.png
>>170551
A bit negative. Aren't you?
Anonymous
No.170554
170556
>>170552
Instead of focusing on his negativity, maybe think of why everyone else on this board is so tired of you.
Anonymous
No.170556
170558 170562
sVD.png
>>170554
>sagging again
Maybe you could attend your own threads instead of getting obsessed with others' would bring you inner peace.
Anonymous
No.170558
170560 170562
e96.png
>>170556
>attend your own threads
It's not about the thread. It's about you. The way you behave, not only in this thread, but in all of the others, including ones that I made, both recently and less recently. You dump low-quality garbage and facebook-tier memes all over this board before derailing them with barely-related tangents.
Everypony is sick of you.
Anonymous
No.170560
170562
c2b.jpg
>>170558
>It's about you.
Ah, it is personal so.
I'm afraid that I might not conform to your specs as you desire. Independent minds rarely do so, and it is natural that conformists like you lose their minds. Sorry, not much can be done about it. You may have to learn to deal with different opinions and approaches as life is not designed to cater your taste.
Anonymous
No.170561
1548948__safe_screencap_twilight+sparkle_alicorn_pony_my+little+pony-colon-+the+movie_angry_annoyed_cropped_faic_female_food_mare_mug_oats_solo_tankard_twilight.png
>170560
>different opinions
>I might not conform to your specs
>conformists like you
He really doesn't get it...
Anonymous
No.170562
1559678653564-4.jpg
1E4E3C62735C4B1092EF6E08AD54A114-100366.jpg
D078516F3FD1173B395D0F5B0D873D9E-2039626.gif
>>170556
>>170558
>>170560
Are you samefagging?
You know what. Fuck it.
Anonymous
No.170582
170583
Science.png
Science.
Anonymous
No.170583
170585 170587
1700069863607612-1.png
>>170582
I did the work of digging up the links, in case anybody cares to know more context than a single meme provides:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2022/08/03/do-we-need-the-first-ever-drop-second-a-new-wobble-by-earth-caused-the-shortest-day-since-records-began-say-scientists/amp/
https://www.independent.co.uk/space/earth-spinning-slower-day-length-b2140840.html

For the record, although the two headlines are conflicting, they're actually talking about the same phenomenon: the gradual deceleration of the Earth's rotation, and fluctuations thereof ala the Chandler Wobble (caused, of course, by Chris Chan's attempt to psionically bring about The Merge early from jail last year). Both articles are consistent with one another, probably prompted by the same news; it's just one is focused on the Chandler Wobble that offsets the general trend, and the other is focused on the gradual slowdown with the exceptional fluctuations caused by the wobble.
OP of course didn't bother to check the articles and instead just reposted a crappy meme that his Facebook algorithm recommended him with highlighted text as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
Anonymous
No.170585
170589
f6de99e93d59b0c8b797f9b75b8a9d4e.jpg
>>170583
>as if that somehow alone proves that the earth is flat.
Actually the lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball.
Neither you nor the fake scientists can beat that.
Anonymous
No.170587
170588
t17fc.png
>>170583
>I did the work of digging up the links
Imagine a faget so obsessed with insisting he was not deceived instead of accepting the overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat.
Anonymous
No.170588
OIG-24-1.png
>>170587
What that to do with providing links?
>overwhelming evidence that this realm is flat
Lol, lmao even
Anonymous
No.170589
170591 170603
C2huWujXcAAXj8D.jpg_large.jpg
>>170585
>lack of curvature demonstrates definitively that we are not living on a ball
We've been showing you evidence of curvature from dozens of separate sources for more than two years now. You just refuse to acknowledge them because they contradict your worldview, or you call them fake without arguing for it. We've also refuted your claims to the contrary with eloquent and well-backed arguments, to which you just shit all over the board or pretend like you won by dumping your smug reaction image folder, and then go on to ignore the arguments themselves without addressing them because you know you can't. Then you wait a few weeks/months and post (redundant) memes parroting the same exact arguments that we refuted earlier in the thread, conveniently forgetting the prior argument which you failed to answer to.

Every couple weeks it's the same shit. You make an statement based on a shaky claim, you fail to refute the opposing argument, and then you forget it like it never happened and post the same thing again (as if we couldn't just scroll up to see it).
Anonymous
No.170591
170592
rrr.jpg
>>170589
>Invoking der Führer to prove your point
I can do that.
Anonymous
No.170592
170593 170595
Map_of_the_Interior_World.png
>>170591
Those circular maps are used in wars because they're more accurate for the northern hemisphere.
We know Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow, and sent scouts to the North Pole to investigate the to hyperborea.
Anonymous
No.170593
File (hide): CBA26DCFC2604D806820A20FF5ED8BDD-5538929.webm (5.3 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:02:21, 276.webm) [play once] [loop]
276.webm
>>170592
>because he instead entertained the hypothesis that it could be hollow
I'm not aware of der Führer sending expeditions because of that.
But according to some, that idea makes sense indeed as the Black Sun is below.
Anonymous
No.170595
>>170592
Isn't the North Pole basically just water? Besides, you don't know he was looking for hyperborea. He probably just wanted to meet Santa Claus.
Anonymous
No.170603
170604
>>170589
>t. monologuer, the monologuing faggot
Anonymous
No.170604
170605
4njw-1546812165-429177-full.jpeg
>>170603
>hurr durr monologue
You are like a baby. You failed to come up with a coherent response, so you once again resort to red herrings.
OP
No.170605
10d.gif
>>170604
I - i'm sorry, but the anon you are answering to, it is not me.
Anonymous
No.170607
170608 170612
fl1.jpeg
Lake Titicaca - 1.76 miles of missing curvature.jpg

Anonymous
No.170608
170609 170610 170611
>>170607
>pic 1
What is that place?
Also, why wouldn't reflections be possible on a round earth?
>pic 2
Idk how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible than it would be at sea level.
That diagram is wonky too.
Anonymous
No.170609
Jeeps-driving-through-Uyuni-salt-flats-in-Bolivia.jpg
bolivia1.jpg
uyuni.jpg
Salar-de-Uyuni-verão.jpg
Uyuni3.jpg
>>170608
>What is that place?
Uyuni Salt Flats, in Bolivia, South America.
Anonymous
No.170610
170612
The Law of Reflection proves a Flat Earth.jpeg
288_o.jpg
>>170608
>Also, why wouldn't reflections be possible on a round earth?
Judge by yourself.
Anonymous
No.170611
>>170608
>how higher elevation of the lake is supposed to make surface level curvature more visible
It is not about elevation, but a 118 miles distance.
Anonymous
No.170612
170613
>>170610
Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
You'd have to include a person, the location, the celestial bodies, the seasons and how light works.
You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
>>170607
>everywhere has to be round or flat all the time
That's how I know you're a nigger.
Anonymous
No.170613
170614
curve-of-earth-spherical-trigonometry-measurement.png
>>170612
>Draw it to scale, you'll find out your flat Earth models doesn't work in general.
>You've botched each and every question given to you by answering with nothing.
Dear anon, you don't want answers but to be right on the lies you support.
The round model fails every time you apply trigonometry and according to the fake scientists numbers. By the way, trigonometry is impervious to scales, in case your arrogant ignorance won't let you study a bit of math to come to the level of discussion needed in this thread.
Anonymous
No.170614
170616 170617
>>170613
It's quite impressive that you've never traveled.
The Earth is an orb-oid it's extremely roughly ovoid to spherical made of spikes, flats, dips, dives and dodge.
A lump.
That means the topology and geology of various locations are varied and different.
There's the macro scale which is close enough to a sphere for rocket, projectile physics.
The local scale is rough.
Trigonometry works.
There is a drop off. Otherwise you can't do ballistics or you miss.
When you know the scale of a man and his measure and what ground he stands on you can know truth.
The truth loves you and is waiting for you.
The truth is alot bigger than you're giving credit for.
Explanations have been posted again and again before. Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
Anonymous
No.170616
>>170614
>Multiple Tests you can do that are repeatable, measurable and practical.
That's science 101, sadly, the heliocentric model doesn't pass the tests.
Anonymous
No.170617
170618
File (hide): 967AEDD5B55C22EF868D3D2C76739A33-3542750.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:28, hypnosis.mp4) [play once] [loop]
hypnosis.mp4
>>170614
Globers are under hypnosis, a guy says.
Anonymous
No.170618
170623
1406901905191.png
1556206996123.png
498AB24B966A1BDCF7D936B4FB3938EA-242439.jpg
EF8297B3DC08727E27BC5787C195D001-185684.jpg
9382973E94D46B25089AF5188A65900B-972221.png
>>170617
>nobody
>spouts claim
>doesn't support it
Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
Anonymous
No.170623
170624
FE.jpeg
>>170618
>Hey everybody stop doing anything some jackass said you're just under hypnosis.
Including (you).
Anonymous
No.170624
10154687DE3513CA794B93659E384C6C-183160.jpg
>>170623
That's right especially you.
You can't answer anybody's questions.
You can't say why flat earth is important.
You can't critically look at whatever you spout here.
You can't say anything of value besides your talking points.
I get you're trying to psyop because you got salty over being assblasted about jews, samefagging and bring a stick in the mud amidst other faggotry.
I understand you have special needs, very special needs, but I'd suggest focusing your tisms on more profitable pursuits.
Anonymous
No.170650
170651 170688 170715
dome.png
dome 2.jpg
Anonfilly - thinking.png

Anonymous
No.170651
170652 170653
>>170650
Doesn't this also imply that space is real though, since the particles are coming from outside the field?

Also, this has been a known thing for a while. The Earth's unique magnetic field protects life on the world from harmful solar wind and cosmic particles. It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Anonymous
No.170652
giphy-2585297290.gif
>>170651
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
That's what you've been told.
Anonymous
No.170653
170654
hole.jpg
>>170651
>It's a feature of having a solid metal core beneath the liquid mantle.
Mmmm. Do you know that that claim is just a theory? The deepest perforation ever made on the Earth's surface has been only 12 km which can be considered as just a scratch.
Anonymous
No.170654
170687
>>170653
Where are the elections in the link you posted coming from, besides outer space?
Anonymous
No.170685
Grav.jpeg
Fundamentals of gravity.
Anonymous
No.170687
170688
FE - Are you vaccinated.jpg
>>170654
>elections
What elections?
>in the link you posted
What link?
>besides outer space
The post mentioned the inner core of a planet. What outer space are you talking about?
Anonymous
No.170688
170715
>>170687
*electrons
>What outer space are you talking about?
The pics in >>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.
Anonymous
No.170713
Ship disappearing below the horizon.gif
Globetards logic- Earth's too big to see curvature and boats over the horizon.png

Anonymous
No.170715
170716
>>170688
>The pics in >>170650 refer to electrons coming from outer space being blocked by an invisible shield.
Ah, those.
Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth? I mean, the claim that there is "A Shield" is gibberish for "It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
Anonymous
No.170716
170717
>>170715
>Do you realize that everything written in that article is based on hired "scientists" doing measurements on Earth?
Then why did you post them?
>"It must be a filter somewhere up there because my instrument is not recording as many electrons as I wish".
You must've not read it.
Anonymous
No.170717
170719
change.jpeg
>>170716
>Then why did you post them?
To oblige globers like you. After all, I understand that some fags have problems coming to terms with the lies they have been fed all their lives.
Anonymous
No.170719
170792
E46B3F5313179DC04B147D86486610DB-81553.jpg
>>170717
You just say shit because you like spewing shit.
Wow, amazing, incredible, stupendous.
We have gone 2,225 posts and you are still unable and refuse to prove your position about anything about Flat Earth.
Besides muh globers, hurr durr I'm the smort cause I can say use Camera and ignore everyone.
Anonymous
No.170722
170724
moon set.gif

Anonymous
No.170724
>>170722
The doggy is still digging the filmation set.
Anonymous
No.170792
>>170719
It's all so tiresome.
Anonymous
No.170942
170943
plane_globe_flat_earth.png
IMG_6508.png
1701372036913332m.jpg

Anonymous
No.170943
170944
>>170942
Wow, more brainlet tier memes. I'm so impressed.
Anonymous
No.170944
170946
>>170943
its okay ballfag, we know you cant meme
Anonymous
No.170946
170950 170963
johnelway-dealwithit.gif
1636400__safe_artist-colon-anonymous_oc_oc+only_oc-colon-milo+highliss_-fwslash-mlpol-fwslash-_faic_gun_hoof+hold_reaction+image_simple+background_smiling_smug_.png
>>170944
You will never have a flat Earth. You have no model, you have no math, you have no testable predictions. You have a zoomed in photo twisted by bad line-of-sight calculations and weed into a crude mockery of God's perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your “friends” laugh at your flattie videos behind closed doors.

Rational people are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of hours of education allow smart people to sniff out pseudo scientific frauds with incredible efficiency. Even flat Earth photos which “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a thinking person. Your unanswerable questions are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk girl to watch a video with you, she’ll turn tail and bolt the second she realizes you weren't just joking about flat Earth conspiracy theory.

You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake "I know it's true!" every single morning and tell yourself others are going to believe. But deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight caused by the force you deny, Earth's gravity.

Eventually it’ll be too much to bear – you’ll buy a ring laser gyroscope, start your livestream, and plunge into the cold abyss of Internet mockery. Your parents will find you accidentally proving the globe, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They'll copy and upload your video across social media, and every viewer for the rest of eternity will know Earth is a rotating globe. Your flat Earth videos will decay and get deleted from YouTube, and all that will remain of your legacy is a video with an experiment that unmistakably proves the globe.

This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
Anonymous
No.170950
170952
>>170946
ugh guess ill take the time to disect your shitty meme

>muh model
scientific experiments dont require scientific models all the time

>math
math is used to describe things, whereas physics is meant to explain things. math can be used for anything fake or real

>gyroscope
the 15 degree per hour drift thing is only relative to the poles. it also picks up the movements from the sky. if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds

your move fag
Anonymous
No.170952
170953 170963
john-elway-bud.gif
>>170950
>shitty meme
Lol, lmao even. The poster of badly-compressed jpegs from Facebook in a constant slew of mediocrity and redundant claims calling anyone memes shitty.
Stay mad.
>dont require scientific models
And yet you can't produce any.
>math can be used for anything fake or real
And yet you can't use it to prove your own claims.
>if we were to assume its detecting motion from the ground then that means the ground would move under flying objects suck as planes, helicopters, balloons, and birds
It does. That's why they launch rockets from Florida to take advantage of the rotation of the earth.
Anonymous
No.170953
170955
>>170952
the globe model has been falsified countless times. there is no math to prove the globe model. and you are clueless on the expertise of rocket trajectory. yet you just somehow continue to believe that the earth is magically moving beneath your feet because you were indoctrinated as child
Anonymous
No.170955
170957 170963
1704551715774273-1.png
>>170953
Keep telling yourself that. The Anons on this board will surely come to respect you some day.
Anonymous
No.170957
170963
>>170955
lmao you only care about respect because you dont care about whats true
Anonymous
No.170963
170964
948A76AA4FD30DB36BC179BD1FBD324A-107740.jpg
1583087967993.gif
A6D2B96134AF8C635BE3A1D0258A6E00-201845.png
FC5F344C3EFB881AFE1353EC51726664-212897.jpg
>>170946
>>170952
>>170955
Here are pones they're (uu)^2.
>>170957
>lmao
You enjoy getting ass blasted that much?
Anonymous
No.170964
170965
1695269967655290.png
>>170963
did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?
Anonymous
No.170965
170966
a52.png
1610221__semi-dash-grimdark_twilight+sparkle_rainbow+dash_pony_unicorn_pegasus_meme_crying_blood_wat_unicorn+twilight_-fwslash-mlp-fwslash-_4chan_bla.png
>>170964
Did you bump this thread just too "le btfo globers" too?
Anonymous
No.170966
1579495426153.png
>170964
>did you come in this thread to "le btfo flat earthers" too?
You're doing a fine enough job on your own.
I'm here to spread hors.
>>170965
Anonymous
No.171165
171186
8324949.png

Anonymous
No.171186
171188
once you go.jpg
>>171165
I'm still waiting for some faget to demonstrate the curve.
Anonymous
No.171188
171189
>>171186
We already did, in this thread. Scroll up.
Anonymous
No.171189
171192 171193
025,195 - Flat Earth - What You See vs What You See.jpeg
>>171188
>We already did
Very disappointing, not even one post shows an experiment measuring that theoretical curvature. Like it is a fiction.
Ban evasion
Business Dog
No.171190
171191 171194 171195 171200
I can't believe this thread is still going, there's probably a serpent-worshiping "jew" behind this scheme somewhere.

BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND! I'll post that proof later, if this giant spergthread continues without some ChristStallion posting it before me.

Advice for life: If somesperg (((claims))) something about God's Word or the Bible, make sure you ask them to show the verse (and context) and check to see if it's KJV - the other versions have varying levels of dangerous corruption in them. For example, even the "New" King James version removes the word/name "Jesus" several times - what kind of "Bible" would remove any mention/naming of Jesus?!
Anonymous
No.171191
>>171190
>I can't believe this thread is still going
It's all because a single retard keeps bumping it with his crappy Facebook jpgs. The actual "arguments" (if you could call them that) stopped happening years ago.
Anonymous
No.171192
>>171189
Look again.
Anonymous
No.171193
>>171189
>(Ban evasion)
I'm not aware anypony was banned. Just saying.
Anonymous
No.171194
1318817391452.jpg
>>171190
>BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND!
Citation needed.
Anonymous
No.171195
E-xmpOTVcAY05JY.jpg
>>171190
The serpent does not bow to death. It shall not bow to censorship either.
Jokes aside. I've heard the bible allured to the idea the earth was round. Do post about it.
Anonymous
No.171200
171203 171204
ff3186518c8c45f53fe2ff5baf720966--a-compass-a-circle.jpg
>>171190
Anonymous
No.171203
>>171200
There is no dome mentioned at that reference. Everything else also describes a sphere. Thanks for another boomer post instead of actual arguments.
Anonymous
No.171204
>>171200
Also, the image stretches some of these references by a huge margin.

The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.

As in He established the earth and it can't be undone, aka no one can move it away. But sure, interpret that as it can't rotate. Delusions are better than understanding after all.
Anonymous
No.171205
171206 171211
Screenshot_20240227_230258.jpg
Why my post has been deleted? Hah?
Censorship only shows you are afraid of what others have to say.
Anonymous
No.171206
171207
>>171205
Aren't you ban-evading right now?
Anonymous
No.171207
171208
>>171206
Dude, I'm not banned. I did nothing wrong. What kind of paranoid are you?
Anonymous
No.171208
171209
>>171207
Post above imply that. Idk though.
Anonymous
No.171209
>>171208
Post above is my appreciation of a behavioral pattern that has been increasing form 4 years ago.
Anonymous
No.171211
>>171205
The Jew cries out as he strikes you.