This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg (859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif (6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2061 replies and 1060 files omitted.
>>165778
Found it!
>>163405
So. In this video, we watch the slow and painstaking process of supertanker making a right turn while descending over the horizon. Yes, the videographer zooms out and back in on occasion, however the zoom out and in occurs very fast, and couldn't cause the viewer to think that the slow, gradual dissapearance over the horizon has anything to do with the zoom.
Unless you're a flat earth glownigger like OP, that is
Found it!
>>163405
So. In this video, we watch the slow and painstaking process of supertanker making a right turn while descending over the horizon. Yes, the videographer zooms out and back in on occasion, however the zoom out and in occurs very fast, and couldn't cause the viewer to think that the slow, gradual dissapearance over the horizon has anything to do with the zoom.
Unless you're a flat earth glownigger like OP, that is
>>165794
The effect was produced by a solid prism.
Unless this is crystal magic where a crystal dome produces the same effect as a prism, you're full of shit and you know it, glownigger.
The effect was produced by a solid prism.
Unless this is crystal magic where a crystal dome produces the same effect as a prism, you're full of shit and you know it, glownigger.
Anonymous
No.165796
>inb4 some mlp image from the crystal empire against sombra n shit
>>165795
>The effect was produced by a solid prism
Actually a solid semi-sphere, then Dubay introduces the gas ionization phenomena and the difference between sunlight and day light.
Don't be a faggot a stop lying.
>The effect was produced by a solid prism
Actually a solid semi-sphere, then Dubay introduces the gas ionization phenomena and the difference between sunlight and day light.
Don't be a faggot a stop lying.
>>165797
So for the record, are you staking the claim that ionized gas produces a prismic effect?
Yes, it's a hemisphere but its still prismic (as in, effect), by your insistence.
So for the record, are you staking the claim that ionized gas produces a prismic effect?
Yes, it's a hemisphere but its still prismic (as in, effect), by your insistence.
File (): 82F48BFECA56818E75475A64F047C578-121622.jpg (118.8 KB, 1002x1002, 1pcs-Prism-Laser-Beam-Combine-Cube-Prism-for-405nm-450nm-Blue-Laser-Diode-5W-for-Optical.jpg)
File (): 9BFFBB5AB1CAD4BD1E47AA1E414C4E4C-76942.png (75.1 KB, 1699x2041, sneha-b-volume-of-triangular-prism-07-1606298603.png)
>>165798
>prismic effect?
Anon, it is obvious that gasses don't meet the prism definition. You are confusing the term perhaps with light diffusion (Physics 101).
>prismic effect?
Anon, it is obvious that gasses don't meet the prism definition. You are confusing the term perhaps with light diffusion (Physics 101).
Anonymous
No.165801
>>165800
However you did insist on a transparent mysterious solid dome which does fall on as prismatic effect, not only that the speed of light through the various mediums should be calculatable as with the energy required.
Some fuckery is going on.
Not only that but everything that goes on everywhere has to be described in detail and all the stuff has to match up.
I mean this should be a trifle really, in a solid dome the fuck is space rocks that land.
However you did insist on a transparent mysterious solid dome which does fall on as prismatic effect, not only that the speed of light through the various mediums should be calculatable as with the energy required.
Some fuckery is going on.
Not only that but everything that goes on everywhere has to be described in detail and all the stuff has to match up.
I mean this should be a trifle really, in a solid dome the fuck is space rocks that land.
File (): D0384AD1B09DD72CCEAB458A880DFEA6-129907.jpg (126.9 KB, 1280x960, dRBDrCrnHQrNyOwH32sl8Kpn.jpg)
>Flat Earth - Meteors, Comets and Craters
>Meteors, meteorites, asteroids, comets, and shooting stars are not what you have been led to believe.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/FlatEarth-MeteorsCometsandCraters:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ZogXzFn5Vqw/
>Meteors, meteorites, asteroids, comets, and shooting stars are not what you have been led to believe.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/FlatEarth-MeteorsCometsandCraters:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ZogXzFn5Vqw/
Anonymous
No.165804
>>165803
There's another interesting theory about objects falling from the dome. Not substantiated but it gives food for thought.
>Meteors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3TVlW8PXkw
There's another interesting theory about objects falling from the dome. Not substantiated but it gives food for thought.
>Meteors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3TVlW8PXkw
>>165781
>>165790
Thanks for your reply.
I was actually thinking of these videos, reposting them here for the ease of access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk&ab_channel=EricDubay
6:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
3:14
What do you think about them? The timestamps are the ones that discuss ship's hulls going over the horizon first.
>>165790
Thanks for your reply.
I was actually thinking of these videos, reposting them here for the ease of access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk&ab_channel=EricDubay
6:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
3:14
What do you think about them? The timestamps are the ones that discuss ship's hulls going over the horizon first.
>>165807
But again, that's horseshit.
When we're talking about ladies walking, or cars driving, the relative area where the distortive visual effect is at MAX 2', which is acceptable given the threshold of the distortion.
In the video I provided, we're talking about watching AN ENTIRE SUPERTANKER, OVER 100' TALL, SLOWLY CROSS THE VISUAL THRESHOLD OF THE HORIZON.
We are not the same.
But again, that's horseshit.
When we're talking about ladies walking, or cars driving, the relative area where the distortive visual effect is at MAX 2', which is acceptable given the threshold of the distortion.
In the video I provided, we're talking about watching AN ENTIRE SUPERTANKER, OVER 100' TALL, SLOWLY CROSS THE VISUAL THRESHOLD OF THE HORIZON.
We are not the same.
Anonymous
No.165810
>>165808
To further clarify this point.
According to Eric Bidet, the proportion of the distorted object (ship) that is obscured is relative to the distance and pverall volume. Meaning, as something becomes more distant and miniscule, the more of it's body becomes obscured, at least if the earth was flat. Which it is not.
You can tell using the ship video, because the overwhelming width of the ship is quite prominent right up until the point that it disappears over the horizon.
Again to Bidet's assertion, the proportion of the vehicle that is distorted should be relative to the overall volume. Thats observably not the case. The entire height of the ship dsappears over the horizon WELL before the width does so. Unless they sailed into a sea of piranha solution, and that supertanker got dissolved from the base up, it is impossible for the flat earth model to account for the ship's disappearance, no matter HOW many straws of 'perspective' and 'zoom' one grasps at.
Simply put, when one comprehends physics, math, proportion, etc. - regardless of what their opinion of round/flat earth - that ONE video conclusively proves that the earth is not flat.
Which is also why OP won't touch that video with a 10 foot pole.
That he persists with this flat earth nonsense while knowing that his position is literally impossible - no matter how much rhetoric/pilpul he attempts - is the cause by which I assert he's a filthy glownigger, probably tasked with monitoring/obfuscating site activity (and most likely, just one of hundreds who have been sent to various chan-boards to keep an eye out for any Christchurch-esque activity).
Having said and having grasped his motivation, his position has long since been illustrated as arguing in bad faith, intellectually dishonest, as well as laughably unsupportable, excepting individuals one or more standard deviations of intellect below the average.
To further clarify this point.
According to Eric Bidet, the proportion of the distorted object (ship) that is obscured is relative to the distance and pverall volume. Meaning, as something becomes more distant and miniscule, the more of it's body becomes obscured, at least if the earth was flat. Which it is not.
You can tell using the ship video, because the overwhelming width of the ship is quite prominent right up until the point that it disappears over the horizon.
Again to Bidet's assertion, the proportion of the vehicle that is distorted should be relative to the overall volume. Thats observably not the case. The entire height of the ship dsappears over the horizon WELL before the width does so. Unless they sailed into a sea of piranha solution, and that supertanker got dissolved from the base up, it is impossible for the flat earth model to account for the ship's disappearance, no matter HOW many straws of 'perspective' and 'zoom' one grasps at.
Simply put, when one comprehends physics, math, proportion, etc. - regardless of what their opinion of round/flat earth - that ONE video conclusively proves that the earth is not flat.
Which is also why OP won't touch that video with a 10 foot pole.
That he persists with this flat earth nonsense while knowing that his position is literally impossible - no matter how much rhetoric/pilpul he attempts - is the cause by which I assert he's a filthy glownigger, probably tasked with monitoring/obfuscating site activity (and most likely, just one of hundreds who have been sent to various chan-boards to keep an eye out for any Christchurch-esque activity).
Having said and having grasped his motivation, his position has long since been illustrated as arguing in bad faith, intellectually dishonest, as well as laughably unsupportable, excepting individuals one or more standard deviations of intellect below the average.
Anonymous
No.165811
File (): 5286C713B6E91776908B6DE325B3DAB6-8979758.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:47, FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>FLAT EARTH MOON MAP WITH AMAZING DETAILS
Neither the source or content can be proven. Take it with two grains of salt and healthy skepticism.
Neither the source or content can be proven. Take it with two grains of salt and healthy skepticism.
Anonymous
No.165812
>Im just gonna ignore the elephant in the room, the thread
>>165814
Yes, but you'll never get an admission from OP. It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
>inb4 hurr, it shows a flat earth
>inb4 your words not mine
Yes, but you'll never get an admission from OP. It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
>inb4 hurr, it shows a flat earth
>inb4 your words not mine
File (): CC885AC96609D91C07B350793CF18FFC-117598.jpg (114.8 KB, 736x704, feStEGTcxW.jpg)
>>165815
>It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
What a coincidence, because the same may apply to (you).
>It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
What a coincidence, because the same may apply to (you).
>>165818
>n... no u!
Factually and evidently incorrect.
My assessment of (you) is based on observation and your displayed behavior. I'm perfectly open to theories that have evidential merit, and I am on record with a 'whackjob' theory of my own. And yet, I manage to avoid patronizing anons, dismissing their positions without merit (I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless) and outright ignoring evidence I can't contest.
No no, again, that's just (you)
>n... no u!
Factually and evidently incorrect.
My assessment of (you) is based on observation and your displayed behavior. I'm perfectly open to theories that have evidential merit, and I am on record with a 'whackjob' theory of my own. And yet, I manage to avoid patronizing anons, dismissing their positions without merit (I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless) and outright ignoring evidence I can't contest.
No no, again, that's just (you)
>>165819
>(I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless)
... Why? Why are you entertaining this retard with your attention?
You seem to have already understood that he can't be convinced, so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him? What are you trying to prove?
>(I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless)
... Why? Why are you entertaining this retard with your attention?
You seem to have already understood that he can't be convinced, so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him? What are you trying to prove?
Anonymous
No.165830
File (): E9B10644C5078B588E86B263C2F39F60-12152650.mp4 (11.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:03, WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
WW2 and Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165833
File (): B7B03770BF75ED8849BF23EDA8326F40-725483.png (708.5 KB, 1280x720, facehoof.png)
>>165832
>tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
>largesse
I'm impressed.
>faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
A bit over the top. Don't (you) think?
>tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
>largesse
I'm impressed.
>faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
A bit over the top. Don't (you) think?
>>165834
>over the top
Not at all. If he was posing the question/ideas to have a discussion, discuss the merits admit/acknowledge the flaws, and engage in GOOD faith dialogue/exchange, then yes, that would be over the top. IF that's what he was doing.
>over the top
Not at all. If he was posing the question/ideas to have a discussion, discuss the merits admit/acknowledge the flaws, and engage in GOOD faith dialogue/exchange, then yes, that would be over the top. IF that's what he was doing.
Anonymous
No.165837
>>165832
>ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
No it isn't. You can't go arguing with every retard on a chansite.
>Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
That's none of your business; and no, they wouldn't.
>Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
Over the past year+ of arguing, you have not succeeded in making him leave. This isn't worth your attention.
>ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
No it isn't. You can't go arguing with every retard on a chansite.
>Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
That's none of your business; and no, they wouldn't.
>Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
Over the past year+ of arguing, you have not succeeded in making him leave. This isn't worth your attention.
>>165838
>tries to conflate Mlpol with all other chansites, including 4chan
Get fucked, our demographics are way different than other chans, the circumstances are entirely different and so the strategy must also be proprietary. Additionally, I don't argue with every asshole on the site because A. Most assholes dont persist for literal years with a conclusively fallacious premise and B. Because for some reason, people tend to leave the flatty alone.
>none of your business
Get fucked, this site IS my business. Its called TAKING responsibility. If (you) knew the first thing about it, we wouldnt be having this cpnversation/issue.
>he hasnt left, not worth your attention
Oh, so now you're concerned with how I value my time? Get fucked thrice. The intent is not to make him leave, (tho it would be nice) the intent is to cement in his and other eager flatties looking for a beachhead of sorts that these ideas and the pilpul methods of asserting then will NOT go unopposed, and will be readily destroyed at leisure, often casually.
>tries to conflate Mlpol with all other chansites, including 4chan
Get fucked, our demographics are way different than other chans, the circumstances are entirely different and so the strategy must also be proprietary. Additionally, I don't argue with every asshole on the site because A. Most assholes dont persist for literal years with a conclusively fallacious premise and B. Because for some reason, people tend to leave the flatty alone.
>none of your business
Get fucked, this site IS my business. Its called TAKING responsibility. If (you) knew the first thing about it, we wouldnt be having this cpnversation/issue.
>he hasnt left, not worth your attention
Oh, so now you're concerned with how I value my time? Get fucked thrice. The intent is not to make him leave, (tho it would be nice) the intent is to cement in his and other eager flatties looking for a beachhead of sorts that these ideas and the pilpul methods of asserting then will NOT go unopposed, and will be readily destroyed at leisure, often casually.
>>165839
Okay, fine. Argue with him all you want, but for the love of god, sage your posts so the rest of us don't have to see this thread at the top of the overboard/catalog every day.
Okay, fine. Argue with him all you want, but for the love of god, sage your posts so the rest of us don't have to see this thread at the top of the overboard/catalog every day.
>>165840
>Im the reason its on the overboard
Glad you mentioned it.
Why are /vx/ threads on perma-bump? Is it cuz the /vx/ threads are of such quality that exceeds even mainboard threads? Or is there something else to it?
>Im the reason its on the overboard
Glad you mentioned it.
Why are /vx/ threads on perma-bump? Is it cuz the /vx/ threads are of such quality that exceeds even mainboard threads? Or is there something else to it?
>>165842
Sounds like an interesting discussion for /qa/. No idea why the /vx/ catalog is like this.
In the meantime, remember to sage. You're not the only one who argues with OP. I do it too on occasion, but I sage the thread so as to not give it extra attention. Just because OP bumps it doesn't mean you have to.
Sounds like an interesting discussion for /qa/. No idea why the /vx/ catalog is like this.
In the meantime, remember to sage. You're not the only one who argues with OP. I do it too on occasion, but I sage the thread so as to not give it extra attention. Just because OP bumps it doesn't mean you have to.
>>165843
>sage
Respectfully declined
>I dont know why
I do, and were it not for this thread it wouldnt be an issue. Unfortunately, this thread enjoys the fruits of the otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/, which stymies the natural user rejection of such threads as these, if it was to either hit bump limit and be remade or be bumplocked and still be remade.
>/qa/
Riiiiiiiiiight. I'll add it to my letter to Santa while I'm at it.
>sage
Respectfully declined
>I dont know why
I do, and were it not for this thread it wouldnt be an issue. Unfortunately, this thread enjoys the fruits of the otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/, which stymies the natural user rejection of such threads as these, if it was to either hit bump limit and be remade or be bumplocked and still be remade.
>/qa/
Riiiiiiiiiight. I'll add it to my letter to Santa while I'm at it.
Anonymous
No.165847
Flat eartherism is a jewish psyop
>>165846
Why, for the rp games, of course that is, the ones other than dick strangler's, who insists on posting to the mainboard cuz... reasons
Why, for the rp games, of course that is, the ones other than dick strangler's, who insists on posting to the mainboard cuz... reasons
>>165848
I don't think perma-bumping threads necessarily help games. Making new threads isn't that hard.
I don't think perma-bumping threads necessarily help games. Making new threads isn't that hard.
Anonymous
No.165851
>>165849
Well, when I was running a game, I insisted that my threads be immediately bump locked, but I had a hard on for AVOIDING the main page and then later, the overboard.
But current GMs,... ahem insist that it is too troublesome for players to check the thread(s), and further that lol the audience see when there's activity.
spoiler alert: it ain't gonna change
Well, when I was running a game, I insisted that my threads be immediately bump locked, but I had a hard on for AVOIDING the main page and then later, the overboard.
But current GMs,... ahem insist that it is too troublesome for players to check the thread(s), and further that lol the audience see when there's activity.
spoiler alert: it ain't gonna change
Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it.
Anonymous
No.165854
>>165853
Thats true, it isnt. But neither is the problem going to be properly addressed if I do so again, respectfully declined.
Thats true, it isnt. But neither is the problem going to be properly addressed if I do so again, respectfully declined.
File (): 038FB9DA03F4D0CA6CC93E6AB62E20E4-97008.png (94.7 KB, 839x928, disgusting.png)
>>165852
>Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it
One thing is your non-stop screeching because you would have to admit you were living a lie. But to sabotage a thread with bump-locking is totally a different league and shows how far, and low, you are willing to go to silence the opinions and facts you don't like.
Very commie of you.
>Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it
One thing is your non-stop screeching because you would have to admit you were living a lie. But to sabotage a thread with bump-locking is totally a different league and shows how far, and low, you are willing to go to silence the opinions and facts you don't like.
Very commie of you.
File (): 20BE94FB5DA7EFC5180D76C15C32A02C-271151.png (264.8 KB, 1280x720, rgeb39n8s.png)
Anonymous
No.165862
Who am I kidding, thats the intellectual honesty the site has been known for, these days.
>>165855
>sabotage
This right here. OP considers it sabotage to NOT be able to bump this shit in perpetuity
>sabotage
This right here. OP considers it sabotage to NOT be able to bump this shit in perpetuity
File (): 02AF5206CC3425C085411EF49FD1C2B0-1548984.gif (1.5 MB, 680x787, pinkie pie ---haters---.gif)
Anonymous
No.165866
Nigger.
Anonymous
No.165869
Due to technical concerns brought up by users, bump limit on /vx/ has been lowered to 2,147,483,647. We apologize for any problems that the overly high bump limit has caused.
File (): 38CC88E8662340885230E36B392D6D28-12036873.gif (11.5 MB, 640x360, derpytech5.gif)
I want to thank all of our concerned users for pointing out the critical flaw in our bump system that has been with us for years.
https://mlpol.net/vx/50370
https://mlpol.net/vx/51841
https://mlpol.net/vx/53728
https://mlpol.net/vx/55271
https://mlpol.net/vx/58626
https://mlpol.net/vx/60316
Look at those pathetic reply numbers that effectively organizes a campaign of such a scale. The need for a patch to the number of replies was long overdue. We have now solved this issue effective immediately.
https://mlpol.net/vx/50370
https://mlpol.net/vx/51841
https://mlpol.net/vx/53728
https://mlpol.net/vx/55271
https://mlpol.net/vx/58626
https://mlpol.net/vx/60316
Look at those pathetic reply numbers that effectively organizes a campaign of such a scale. The need for a patch to the number of replies was long overdue. We have now solved this issue effective immediately.
Tbh, the bump limits on all of the boards are too high.
But the fact that /vx/ has no bump limit and no archive makes it stand out.
But the fact that /vx/ has no bump limit and no archive makes it stand out.
>>165875
There was a bump limit of a ridiculous 2000. Far too small to be of use as the examples on the board show. We have now patched this. To think we almost got to that number naturally if we didn't get alerted to the problem.
There was a bump limit of a ridiculous 2000. Far too small to be of use as the examples on the board show. We have now patched this. To think we almost got to that number naturally if we didn't get alerted to the problem.
Anonymous
No.165877
>>165852
There is no reason to single this thread out among any of the others on /vx/.
I think bump limits should be fixed, but not in a way that targets any particular thread.
There is no reason to single this thread out among any of the others on /vx/.
I think bump limits should be fixed, but not in a way that targets any particular thread.
>>165876
What's the bump limit now?
Imo, it shouldn't be higher than 500, which is the highest it ever was back on 4chan (for faster boards like /a/ and /v/). I really don't think there's any reason for them to be higher than that.
What's the bump limit now?
Imo, it shouldn't be higher than 500, which is the highest it ever was back on 4chan (for faster boards like /a/ and /v/). I really don't think there's any reason for them to be higher than that.
Even a bump limit of 300 would be large, considering the speed of this board.
>>165880
>The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread.
I remember this. Imo, that was a mistake...
Imo, its why I care about this issue, because I feel like I contributed to the problem by selfishly requesting that the bump limits be increased for those RP threads back in the day, without consideration for the long-term damage it would do to the site. I've since realized that that was probably a bad idea.
>Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647.
Oh, I see this is a shitpost.
Shitposting aside, could we maybe talk about this in /qa/? There's already a thread up on the topic: >>>/qa/5974 → I don't want to shit-up this thread, even if some other Anons would rather discuss their meta grievances here for some reason...
Bump limits have been an issue I've been trying to raise awareness of for a while, and I think it's worth some more serious discussion.
>The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread.
I remember this. Imo, that was a mistake...
Imo, its why I care about this issue, because I feel like I contributed to the problem by selfishly requesting that the bump limits be increased for those RP threads back in the day, without consideration for the long-term damage it would do to the site. I've since realized that that was probably a bad idea.
>Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647.
Oh, I see this is a shitpost.
Shitposting aside, could we maybe talk about this in /qa/? There's already a thread up on the topic: >>>/qa/5974 → I don't want to shit-up this thread, even if some other Anons would rather discuss their meta grievances here for some reason...
Bump limits have been an issue I've been trying to raise awareness of for a while, and I think it's worth some more serious discussion.
Anonymous
No.165884
>>165882
I don't recall you making a big scene when the decision was made either. It's not like we don't have an entire board for meta issues.
I don't recall you making a big scene when the decision was made either. It's not like we don't have an entire board for meta issues.
Anonymous
No.165891
>Eric Dubay
>Why isn't Polaris Visible from Australia?
>Globe Earthers are taught the reason that the North Pole Star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular Earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, they claim these boats and the Pole Star are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the Earth was truly a stationary plane that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-isn't-Polaris-Visible-from-Australia-:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cULQxgB1pmK/
>Why isn't Polaris Visible from Australia?
>Globe Earthers are taught the reason that the North Pole Star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular Earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, they claim these boats and the Pole Star are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the Earth was truly a stationary plane that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-isn't-Polaris-Visible-from-Australia-:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cULQxgB1pmK/
File (): A3A196519459C0B05442F82B1AF6651C-797985.png (779.3 KB, 1398x1483, b202f525cc93423f.png)
Anonymous
No.165895
>>165894
To make it more accurate, make the CIA glownigger look like less of a chad and make the flat earther retard on a leash also babble about magic and psychic powers and History Channel-tier ancient alien nonsense to distract people from the jews in banks and government.
To make it more accurate, make the CIA glownigger look like less of a chad and make the flat earther retard on a leash also babble about magic and psychic powers and History Channel-tier ancient alien nonsense to distract people from the jews in banks and government.
Anonymous
No.165941
File (): A472CB788F6E9748749B91A39ACDAEF4-2591708.mp4 (2.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:59, the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Cracking the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.165952
File (): 093FACE42C03B13A524CF83E453D0745-12010054.mp4 (11.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:06:42, Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals
Just a theory.
Just a theory.
Anonymous
No.165956
File (): 68D3D9DBDB1B87E32EFDE340B4444C30-16643.jpg (16.3 KB, 512x385, facebook_1663288789495_6976338822936040640.jpg)
Hey, Pettan niggers.
If the earth is flat why does centrifugal force let slings work?
If the earth is flat why does centrifugal force let slings work?
File (): 8ABE5301A983625CC0DA6E0C29D59B5C-463332.png (452.5 KB, 1061x1024, mocking.png)
Anonymous
No.165968
File (): A39519D73EB94C02B5968429ABC153F1-5537808.gif (5.3 MB, 1280x720, haters gonna hate.gif)
File (): 18D0EB81F9E167F51ED805668BEBCFCB-2553600.mp4 (2.4 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:53, Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>165894
It is wrong to assume that retards are glownigger plants just because they make a community look bad. Dealing with retards is, sadly, a consequence of being a haven of free speech.
That being said, I have no doubt that glowies plant bullshit on altchans and other free speech forums to discredit places like this.
It is wrong to assume that retards are glownigger plants just because they make a community look bad. Dealing with retards is, sadly, a consequence of being a haven of free speech.
That being said, I have no doubt that glowies plant bullshit on altchans and other free speech forums to discredit places like this.
>>165974
Glowniggers do indeed promote the controlled opposition "Flat Earth Society" website. Plenty of politicians and NASA propagandists mention it over and over again for character assassination purposes. That said, experiments don't find any curvature, so the whole ball shaped scam does go down in flames.
Glowniggers do indeed promote the controlled opposition "Flat Earth Society" website. Plenty of politicians and NASA propagandists mention it over and over again for character assassination purposes. That said, experiments don't find any curvature, so the whole ball shaped scam does go down in flames.
>>165978
Actually they are experiments that most people can reproduce, which is the very definition of science sticking to the Scientific Method.
Actually they are experiments that most people can reproduce, which is the very definition of science sticking to the Scientific Method.
Anonymous
No.165981
File (): E37BEE20850C9BD7F461C9D4B728B4F4-384913.jpg (375.9 KB, 1280x713, ball shaped earth - why lie.jpg)
>Why Would They Lie About Flat Earth? - (6:37 long)
>When confronted with blatant NASA lies and obvious globe inconsistencies, the #1 most common frequently asked question is undoubtedly: but why would anyone lie about the shape of the Earth!? For what purpose would there be a multi-generational worldwide conspiracy to cover up the truth of our home? Why would NASA spend billions of dollars building rockets just to prank the population about outer space? What on Earth would be the point of hiding the flat Earth?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/WhyWouldTheyLieAboutFlatEarth:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKOj2zORvKUo/
>When confronted with blatant NASA lies and obvious globe inconsistencies, the #1 most common frequently asked question is undoubtedly: but why would anyone lie about the shape of the Earth!? For what purpose would there be a multi-generational worldwide conspiracy to cover up the truth of our home? Why would NASA spend billions of dollars building rockets just to prank the population about outer space? What on Earth would be the point of hiding the flat Earth?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/WhyWouldTheyLieAboutFlatEarth:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKOj2zORvKUo/
>>165980
>the ones that showed the opposite
Glad you brought it. The very definition of science is that it is not fixed or settled, never ever. Independent experiments unraveled the conspiracy wide open and the scam is undeniable.
>the ones that showed the opposite
Glad you brought it. The very definition of science is that it is not fixed or settled, never ever. Independent experiments unraveled the conspiracy wide open and the scam is undeniable.
>>165982
>it is not fixed or settled, never ever
>the scam is undeniable.
How can you say that it's not fixed or settled, and then immediately say that it's "undeniable"? Are you even listening to yourself?
>it is not fixed or settled, never ever
>the scam is undeniable.
How can you say that it's not fixed or settled, and then immediately say that it's "undeniable"? Are you even listening to yourself?
>>165983
You are confusing physical phenomena with an agreement among conspirators to lie about the former.
You are confusing physical phenomena with an agreement among conspirators to lie about the former.
>>165985
See, that's what I'm talking about. You just dimiss any experiments that disprove your worldview on the basis that they're conspiring against you. Anyone who comes up with a result that indicates curvature of the earth must be lying.
That's the purest form of ad homenim.
See, that's what I'm talking about. You just dimiss any experiments that disprove your worldview on the basis that they're conspiring against you. Anyone who comes up with a result that indicates curvature of the earth must be lying.
That's the purest form of ad homenim.
>>165986
Not quite. Given that experiments paid and promoted by masons and their proxies are done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them, and therefore not suitable for replication, their claims are highly in doubt.
Think about it, people are not able to build an airship, like a zeppelin, and go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation.
Not quite. Given that experiments paid and promoted by masons and their proxies are done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them, and therefore not suitable for replication, their claims are highly in doubt.
Think about it, people are not able to build an airship, like a zeppelin, and go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation.
>>165989
That's just attacking the character of the scientist, and not refuting the substance of the experiment themselves.
>done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them
Have you considered just attacking a camera to a high altitude balloon and letting it fly up into the atmosphere? Even schools can do that; and they do so all the time. Try it yourself.
Or just putting sticks in the sand at different locations and measuring the shadows of their angles. Even the ancient Greeks could do that.
There are so, so, so many sources unaffiliated with NASA or masons or whatever you want to call them that can be independently verified. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just dismiss all of them because they didn't come to the conclusion that you wanted them to.
That's just attacking the character of the scientist, and not refuting the substance of the experiment themselves.
>done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them
Have you considered just attacking a camera to a high altitude balloon and letting it fly up into the atmosphere? Even schools can do that; and they do so all the time. Try it yourself.
Or just putting sticks in the sand at different locations and measuring the shadows of their angles. Even the ancient Greeks could do that.
There are so, so, so many sources unaffiliated with NASA or masons or whatever you want to call them that can be independently verified. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just dismiss all of them because they didn't come to the conclusion that you wanted them to.
>>165989
>go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation
Japanese fishermen go to Antarctica to poach endangered whales all of the time. It's not that hard.
>go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation
Japanese fishermen go to Antarctica to poach endangered whales all of the time. It's not that hard.
>>165990
Ahem.
If it cannot be replicated and then when taking a different approach to confirm the mason experiments you find out that it is all rubbish... Then what else you can say?
Ahem.
If it cannot be replicated and then when taking a different approach to confirm the mason experiments you find out that it is all rubbish... Then what else you can say?
>>165992
>Then what else you can say?
Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake, and check to see if the researchers didn't account for variables.
Then you peer review the experiments and over time continue to reevaluate them until a contemporary understanding is reached.
>mason experiments
Or teenagers with a weather balloon.
>Then what else you can say?
Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake, and check to see if the researchers didn't account for variables.
Then you peer review the experiments and over time continue to reevaluate them until a contemporary understanding is reached.
>mason experiments
Or teenagers with a weather balloon.
>>165994
>Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake
This whole bread is about that, and the mounting evidence against the ball hoax is overwhelming.
>Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake
This whole bread is about that, and the mounting evidence against the ball hoax is overwhelming.
>>165995
I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>overwhelming
And at that point you're just exaggerating. It's easy to make odds look like that if you dismiss any opposing viewpoint as a shill.
Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
>>165993
Yes. Hungry Japs will go anywhere.
I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>overwhelming
And at that point you're just exaggerating. It's easy to make odds look like that if you dismiss any opposing viewpoint as a shill.
Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
>>165993
Yes. Hungry Japs will go anywhere.
>>165996
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
Anonymous
No.165998
>>165997
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
>>165996
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
File (): E3B5FDBDEB509D20579D0318DA084923-3896174.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:400x224 Length:00:03:37, 81beee.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>166000
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.
Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.
Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
>>166001
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
>>166004
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
>>166005
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
>>166006
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
>>166007
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
>>166008
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
>>166009
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
>>166010
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
>>166011
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
>>166012
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
>>166014
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>>166016
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
>>166018
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
>>166021
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
>>166022
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
>>166023
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
>>166024
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
File (): 922478A5CEB7578A5BF60AC59F626B79-3571088.jpg (3.4 MB, 3300x2550, earth-curvature-scale.jpg)
>>166025
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
>>166026
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
File (): 95B2D544741C89DA7764A7CBFA9B7D1B-557251.png (544.2 KB, 1280x720, lafweawee.png)
>>166027
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
Anonymous
No.166031
>>166028
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
Anonymous
No.166039
>SHADOWS NEVER INTERSECT - (3:32 long)
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
Anonymous
No.166043
File (): 50767598B2A63BDCFA60B75252D06FCB-3722834.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:34, Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>Southern Stars Quick Take
Anonymous
No.166046
File (): 2C398BDE21A46FCD182DD2B3CFD90E68-66927.jpg (65.4 KB, 461x1024, UdBKz0kw-92932349-461x1024.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.166055
File (): 8B73BD935FFB40F4E72F1DC67A1B9ED7-10777306.mp4 (10.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:40, The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).mp4) [play once] [loop]
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).
Anonymous
No.166059
File (): 8FA1814624A5EE40E8DB4838275A2396-1328226.mp4 (1.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:42, THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Anonymous
No.166060
File (): C01F2ADA7EA6D99BC6FD528693B37D8C-53944.jpg (52.7 KB, 640x480, hqdefault.jpg)
File (): F4CE3DF84E9CABFEDDA95B4E62B77A31-698215.png (681.9 KB, 1337x757, Scr0516.png)
>The Earth Is Still Flat | Globebusters Response to Professor Dave - (3:15:07 long)
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
Watch till the end and then die in fire.
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
>>166075
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
>>166076
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.
You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.
You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
File (): 83A45415E59B88F652CC055761E4CFC6-5618883.mp4 (5.4 MB, Resolution:578x480 Length:00:02:48, Globeheads be like.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>166077
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
Anonymous
No.166080
Centrifugal force
Bottom text
Bottom text
File (): 621491300615B065441C049B9C14B436-2299774.gif (2.2 MB, 498x399, my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif)
Anonymous
No.166085
File (): BE3B46E04A9EC7841574944FBC587621-827478.png (808.1 KB, 3968x5528, dcbb7r0-6da512e9-63c9-466d-9823-12293f34e9c7.png)
File (): 74DFC51FFFE5D8B55566F02414494AEF-57243.jpg (55.9 KB, 1278x248, 1665862095321637.jpg)
Anonymous
No.166108
File (): 6982CB4D89B05EE76FE7E6BDD0553E8D-778820.png (760.6 KB, 1366x768, 22058.png)
>Proving the Sun Rotates Over a Flat Earth - Must See Evidence by Corey Kell
>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/
The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/
The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
Anonymous
No.166109
>>166098
>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...
Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...
Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
I've been there, its epic. https://adventuresmithexplorations.com/cruises/antarctica/
File (): CA56A28DE937FA4E86A3E99D63906C10-79175.jpg (77.3 KB, 1043x640, The Hindenburg on its first flight on March 4, 1936.jpg)
>>166127
Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
>>166129
>They're not illegal.
In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
>They're not illegal.
In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
File (): BC94069E38FE895880CB87BD8DA864C9-67643.jpg (66.1 KB, 618x763, f-618x763.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.166136
File (): 74C65D1630359E99A2DFA4CF9E4E1556-27761.jpg (27.1 KB, 480x573, yellow-highlight-problems-global-model.jpg)
Anonymous
No.166137
>>166134
Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
Anonymous
No.166141
>>166133
Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
Anonymous
No.166142
File (): EA370BAE0C6CC83643409CA4F5373837-37980.jpg (37.1 KB, 700x602, flatties.jpg)
>>166128
Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
Anonymous
No.166143
>>166133
No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
File (): BCC052A89FAFAF4240C49A4DF5E9A8AC-146393.jpg (143.0 KB, 768x859, img_7688.jpg)
Anonymous
No.166157
File (): ACF4F75D3CFE0A65DB9919F43CF7B54B-74233.jpg (72.5 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)
This bread is getting slow. Let's have some good old fashioned plane facts.
>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earth
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY
>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earth
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY
>>166162
>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!
Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!
Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
Anonymous
No.166172
>>166163
He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
File (): 00234164EBA5A9207C21068064E52DB0-11477148.mp4 (10.9 MB, Resolution:480x852 Length:00:02:30, Forbbiden land_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Debunking a globe believer on travels to Antarctica.
>>166243
Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
Anonymous
No.166245
File (): C3C8B247BFEB2E78A790007F0984D067-226695.jpg (221.4 KB, 1200x1082, ax3L9s5q1UOG.jpeg)
>>166244
Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
>>166243
He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.
As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.
As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
>>166246
>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence
That's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence
That's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
>>166247
It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
>>166248
I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
>>166249
Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
File (): FD413DA76AD5BE54C0A05977A1CC2BBC-145349.jpg (141.9 KB, 1500x939, gyiubkj.jpg)
>>166250
The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
>>166251
So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.
So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.
So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
File (): 454665A940736B9A638243D000124BA0-202433.jpg (197.7 KB, 1117x441, 3qtc34qtv34.jpeg)
>>166252
>It must be flat because you can't get there
Nope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
>It must be flat because you can't get there
Nope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
>>166253
Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
>>166254
>possible alien crash site
Think about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
>possible alien crash site
Think about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
>>166255
You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
>>166256
>You aren't understanding me
Yes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
>You aren't understanding me
Yes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
>>166257
If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.
Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.
Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
>>166258
>If you understand, answer me.
Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
>If you understand, answer me.
Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
File (): D30509D157DD3B8F4B0998A98D8EADF6-338284.jpg (330.4 KB, 1068x1529, 6427307.jpg)
>>166261
Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
File (): 34E20105858BA3D97A22BFD340042189-373347.png (364.6 KB, 512x433, image-10.png)
Anonymous
No.166264
Maybe OP could have been more approachable when it came to the subject. Well, it was intresting as long as it lasted, thanks OP for the thread.
File (): 0CF35F23DB5DE630BE78EBA522A14BC7-141265.jpg (138.0 KB, 1024x576, 1570692315076.jpg)
File (): 68EDF21A1999D7B1E1D6ADFE212BD246-2070849.png (2.0 MB, 4410x3000, 68EDF21A1999D7B1E1D6ADFE212BD246-2070849.png)
File (): 164626E06C10E40D5ADFF2CEEB518014-187950.png (183.5 KB, 700x900, 1579462675229-0.png)
File (): CA70BF0829979F62F488449C58E57DA6-445586.png (435.1 KB, 1500x1000, CA70BF0829979F62F488449C58E57DA6-445586.png)
>>166262
Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259
>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much
>even too much for the values that position founds
>not even an iota of effort
Impressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful. Only difference is predicting what they will do next.
Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259
>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much
>even too much for the values that position founds
>not even an iota of effort
Impressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful. Only difference is predicting what they will do next.
Anonymous
No.166266
File (): EBF479F8BB6C3224CC618A967AD01BF6-349160.png (341.0 KB, 1920x1080, 6110391.png)
So as a violation of rule 7 what will happen to the thread? Will it be deleted/closed?
Odd, I seem to recall getting shouted down to the point of censure for trying to apply the site rules to this thread, and illustrating OP's bad-faith.
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-400] [401-600] [601-800] [801-1000] [1001-1200] [1201-1400] [1401-1600] [1601-1800] [1801-2000] [2001-2200] [2201-2261] [Next] [Live (last 200 replies)]
2261 replies | 1130 files | 234 UUIDs | Page 1