/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2720 replies and 1416 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.164062
164063
>>164061
I'm not. The circumpolar ocean current starts at the southern tip of South America.
Anonymous
No.164063
164064
>>164062
>starts
Says who?
Anonymous
No.164064
164065 164066
>>164063
Hendrik Brouwer (Dutch explorer who developed the route through the current in the early 1600s for spice trade with India)
James Cook (circumnavigated the polar region, iirc he's specifically mentioned by Dubay)
Vito Dumas did so single-handedly during WWII without any knowledge or assistance from world governments
I'll keep looking if you need more names
Anonymous
No.164065
>>164064
oh, and Jon Sanders of Australia has done it 11 times.
Anonymous
No.164066
164067
>>164064
Dude, I sailed the Drake channel 10 years ago two times, I know the place and is hell when choppy, the strong currents are normal because the waters accelerate at that point. Frequently and unexpected weather conditions are the norm, they change without warning in a matter of a couple of hours.
Anonymous
No.164067
164068
>>164066
have you circumnavigated at that latitude? All of these people mentioned (excepting Brouwer) did.
Anonymous
No.164068
164069
>>164067
>circumnavigated
Not circumnavigation, but circurm-continent voyage.
Anonymous
No.164069
164070
>>164068
so you went round Cape Horn. I'm... proud? of you? but by your reckoning you're missing about 50 thousand miles of journey.
Anonymous
No.164070
164071
>>164069
>Cape Horn
It is called Cabo the Hornos by the locals.
Anonymous
No.164071
164072 164075
>>164070
Sure. We're getting off track. I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into. Are you willing to do so, or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong?
Anonymous
No.164072
164073 164096
>>164071
>I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into
The only trusted source is your own eyes. Sailing there without interference.
Anonymous
No.164073
164074
>>164072
Then why reference all these ancient and modern sources when you haven't seen these things with your own eyes? This isn't a disputed fact. Your sources confirm it, my sources confirm it, ball earth sources confirm it, there's a current that goes steadly east to west round the world at the latitudes south of the three southern capes and north of Antarctica. Nobody disputes this that's been round the world at that latitude, including sources you yourself have put forward. Its established fact.
Anonymous
No.164074
>>164073
my apologies, steadily west to east. map dyslexia getting the better of me once again
Anonymous
No.164075
164076
>>164071
>or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong
Enough derailing, the chart is already established and clear faggot >>149243
By the way, that map is super accurate when using a sextant.
Anonymous
No.164076
164077
>>164075
okay, I'm not disputing the map, the shape of the earth, or any other point you've brought up. I simply want to know what your explanation is for an established, fairly stable circumpolar current (and I suppose the winds that go with it, but that's very likely explainable in your model by the motion of the water)
Anonymous
No.164077
164078 164097
>>164076
Again, independent research is needed.
Anonymous
No.164078
164079
>>164077
Independent research has been done and matches the facts I've presented. If its not independent enough for you, I'm terribly sorry, but if someone who is actively hiding from world governments (Vito Dumas) makes the claim, I'm going to call them independent
Anonymous
No.164079
164080 164097
8495.gif
>>164078
>Independent research has been done and matches the facts
Sure.
Anonymous
No.164080
164081
south-edged-equal-azimuth.jpg
>>164079
I accept your concession.

By the way, if you'd just said "it matches up when you view the whole oceanic current map in context of the flat earth" I would have probably taken you at face value, but you're so tied to the very few sources you have that you can't do independent research yourself.

I still don't know if your theory has any merit, but I'm 100% sure now that you, personally, do not.
Anonymous
No.164081
164082 164085
>>164080
In fact, I'm going to go absolutely top tier schizophrenic here and note a few things.
In this diagram, the redder a current, the warmer its water, and per established science, these are the surface currents, whilst cold blue currents are usually much deeper. IF your polar gyre exists, you could explain these currents as warm water being sucked into the pole from the surface, and cold water being pushed back down through the deep ocean. This removes the need for a "breathing" gyre and allows a much more plausible forceful, periodic underswell, possibly because this supposed northern polar whirlpool exists inland on the aforementioned 4 islands, and it "runs out" of water because its recycling effect exceeds the inflow of surface water. Since the land surface, per Dubay, rests ON the ocean, not on underlying crust, this allows for a massive inflow of water to the central reservoir, a relatively quick emptying of the reservoir _under_ the land surface, and a repeat.

There, I just answered your question for you, since you're completely incapable of independent thought.
Anonymous
No.164082
229.png
>>164081
Anonymous
No.164083
164086 164087
How remiss of me
https://youtu.be/7u61hzEG82s
Anonymous
No.164085
164090
>>164055
>>164081
Welcome to the flat earth thread
Anonymous
No.164086
164089 164095 164098
>>164083
>Sci-Fi Dan
A prominent NASA paid shill.
Anonymous
No.164087
164089 164093 164094
>>164083
C'mon, it is obvious that it is about to make fun of a dumbass that can barely articulate his thoughts.
The NASA ballers can rapidly extinguish the Flat Earth discoveries if debate is arranged, but, like the jews they won't do that and pick on low hanging fruits instead while claiming to be on the right.
Imagine if the negro tyson would debate Dubay, but... NASA knows that will be PR disaster.
Anonymous
No.164089
164091
>It hurts to Change your world view: The Thread
Flatters will cope forever.
>>164087
>>164086
>NASA
Nasa has no power you retards.
Anonymous
No.164090
>>164085
Thanks. The problem here seems to be that Dubay has an extremely compelling and calming voice. I watched his history of flat earth and I was honesty a little hooked until he went on his autistic tard rage about the flat earth society
Anonymous
No.164091
164092 164095
>>164089
>Nasa has no power you retards.
I disagree.
You believe all their lies, right?
Anonymous
No.164092
>>164091
Nigger what lies do they even tell?
Anonymous
No.164093
>>164087
>Tyson wont argue rhetoric with a virtual child cuz NASA is scared of the blowback
Imagine unironically thinking this
Anonymous
No.164094
>>164087
yes, acknowledging Dubay as worth debating would be a PR disaster
Anonymous
No.164095
164369
>>164086
>>164091
NASA had to sell all its infrastructure to Elon Musk and outsource its rocks to Russia to stay afloat, and it still can't get congress to fund any of its projects (gotta send that tax money to Israel for their space program instead). Wtf do you think they have the funding to do that?
Anonymous
No.164096
>>164072
>this much goalpost moving
So, you'll only accept direct, personal empirical evidence for ideas that challege your worldview, but you're willing to cite sketchy youtube videos for ones that reinforce it?
Talk about hypocrisy.
Anonymous
No.164097
164369
>>164077
>>164079
Define "independent research".
Anonymous
No.164098
164100 164369
>>164086
>NASA paid shill
Citation unironically needed. I wasted an hour looking for any real evidence of this.
Anonymous
No.164099
0b0fbfa14ac00ef11a6354bebaacd4d1--you-ve.jpg
OP is a retarded faggot.
Anonymous
No.164100
>>164098
welcome to the Flat Earth thread, where "paid shill" means "disagrees with my retarded ideology"
Anonymous
No.164117
164118 164121
bs.jpeg
I think this may fit here:

>Russian space chief speaks out on UFOs
https://www.sott.net/article/468677-Russian-space-chief-speaks-out-on-UFOs
Anonymous
No.164118
164119
>>164117
Well, in the last months the UFO psyop went into overdrive in the States, now the Russians join. Is any doubt left that they are together in the space deception?
Anonymous
No.164119
164120
image.png
>>164118
Anonymous
No.164120
fluffle-puff-gif-20.gif
>>164119
Anonymous
No.164121
img3487.jpeg
>>164117
Anonymous
No.164123
XVA3TlB_AzM.jpeg
>V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946) - (2:02 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVA3TlB_AzM
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/v-2-rocket-films-(flat)-earth-in-(1946):a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2XEoiKjE4kAJ/
Anonymous
No.164124
iiIpOs4FgwY.jpg
File (hide): D18735052A2F0A6F941188E72C6DEE14-5067431.mp4 (4.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:00, Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4
>Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.
Good music.
Anonymous
No.164125
164126 164127
>>148614
rate of rotation is not measured in mph.
The earth rotates at 7.29x10^-5 rads/s. Of course you can't feel it spinning. If you were on a roundabout that was spinning at that rate, you would not even be able to see it moving let alone feel anything.
Anonymous
No.164126
>>164125
>rate of rotation is not measured in mph
And yet on the surface and according to the freemasons we are moving at incredible speeds.
Anonymous
No.164127
164129
>>164125
You tried, but OP feels the best defense is a solid ignorance
Anonymous
No.164129
164145 164146
0a.jpg
>>164127
>You tried
Nope, that faggot is trying to obfuscate when bringing angular speeds which are supposedly constant.
Anonymous
No.164141
>>163908
Dark matter has exactly zero relavence to flat earth. Yes the models are incomplete this is known. But they are more than sufficient to describe our solar system. Even classic newtonian gravity is good enough for the most part.
Anonymous
No.164145
>>164129
Wait till he gets to the lack of comprehension that a sphereoid object has a dissimilar sloping curve depending on what longitude one observes the planet at, and that there is no 'single calculation' for the distance to the horizon