This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
Merry Christmas and Happy Hearth's Warming Everyone and Everypony!
[YouTube] The True Gift of GiftingIf you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg
(859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif
(6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2720 replies and 1398 files omitted.
File (): 11CC9CB02E40AE933D65DED238B003D7-201848.png
(197.1 KB, 540x580, Tumblr_l_147815391118923.png)
File (): 0E2F3A204FA481D471F4B879113CCAD9-69277.png
(67.7 KB, 720x378, coincidence .png)
>>167099
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VtJFb_P2j48&pp=ygURQmlsbCBueWUgc2V4IGp1bms%3D
Remember when Bill Nye had some show that featured this Jewish gem.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VtJFb_P2j48&pp=ygURQmlsbCBueWUgc2V4IGp1bms%3D
Remember when Bill Nye had some show that featured this Jewish gem.
>>167099
Okay, but what does that have to do with flat earth?
Neither of them believe in flat earth, including the one you said was more qualified.
Bill Nye is a hack and a showman, more of a TV personality than a scientist, but it's not like he invented the concept, nor is he a particularly vocal proponent of it. You won't have to look far here to find people who think he's full of shit, but how is that relevant to the conversation?
Okay, but what does that have to do with flat earth?
Neither of them believe in flat earth, including the one you said was more qualified.
Bill Nye is a hack and a showman, more of a TV personality than a scientist, but it's not like he invented the concept, nor is he a particularly vocal proponent of it. You won't have to look far here to find people who think he's full of shit, but how is that relevant to the conversation?
>>167111
It's still a decent question though, because the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie, if supposedly the shape were of little actual consequence.
It's still a decent question though, because the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie, if supposedly the shape were of little actual consequence.
>>167113
>the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie
1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
>the implicit followup is what is the incentive for such an elaborate lie
1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
>>167116
>1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there? Heck, it would make more sense for them to commercialize it with "edge of the world" resorts and whatnot.
>2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
There are easier ways to do this. Most people believe the earth is round, and most people are still religious. Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious. Also, not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat.
>1) To discourage the idea of going beyond the Antarctic perimeter because supposedly there is nothing to see there
Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there? Heck, it would make more sense for them to commercialize it with "edge of the world" resorts and whatnot.
>2) To discredit ancient civilizations' knowledge and also The Bible.
There are easier ways to do this. Most people believe the earth is round, and most people are still religious. Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious. Also, not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat.
File (): EF7DF457A2EB147F203A9B49AFE89C8B-2660368.png
(2.5 MB, 2500x1435, 16825187581546684868983825623526.png)
File (): 2F452EB43C38B0A29A4F76E87B4E9276-55642.jpg
(54.3 KB, 960x569, hqdefault.jpg)
>The Inverse Square Law Proves Local Sun
>This video demonstrates how the Inverse Square Law proves the sun is local, and disproves the heliocentric model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIjFkdbBe-8
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/the-inverse-square-law-proves-local-sun:5
>This video demonstrates how the Inverse Square Law proves the sun is local, and disproves the heliocentric model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIjFkdbBe-8
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/the-inverse-square-law-proves-local-sun:5
>>167117
>Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there?
There is nothing according to the masons.
>Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious
Round earth is a deceptive statement claiming that The Bible is wrong.
>not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat
Really? Would you mind to provide citations?
>Why would they want people to not go there if there's nothing there?
There is nothing according to the masons.
>Round earth does not notably prevent people from being religious
Round earth is a deceptive statement claiming that The Bible is wrong.
>not all ancient civilizations said the world was flat
Really? Would you mind to provide citations?
>>167127
>There is nothing according to the masons.
What is there according to non-masons then? Conventional science says there's outer space and a vast cosmos. What do you think is there?
>>167127
>deceptive statement
It has not notably prevented people from being religious or Christian, so it's a rather impotent method. This isn't really a decent motive for fabricating and maintaining such an elaborate lie that would take tons of resources to keep secret.
>citations
Greeks philosophers 5th century BC:
https://archive.org/details/earlygreekastron0000dick/page/n5/mode/1up
And that's just one example.
>There is nothing according to the masons.
What is there according to non-masons then? Conventional science says there's outer space and a vast cosmos. What do you think is there?
>>167127
>deceptive statement
It has not notably prevented people from being religious or Christian, so it's a rather impotent method. This isn't really a decent motive for fabricating and maintaining such an elaborate lie that would take tons of resources to keep secret.
>citations
Greeks philosophers 5th century BC:
https://archive.org/details/earlygreekastron0000dick/page/n5/mode/1up
And that's just one example.
File (): 448B740690E39411AF6790287BBC2F45-82207.jpg
(80.3 KB, 1280x720, Twilight_looking_angry_S4E26.jpg)
File (): BC5AEF7BAE5689BFDB3798F66F5771B0-10760949.gif
(10.3 MB, 600x338, 1956637.gif)
>>167146
If you want to bump the thread, bump it yourself.
I sage 1/5 posts I make to this board, and I did on 4chan too. I only bump the highest quality threads.
If you want to bump the thread, bump it yourself.
I sage 1/5 posts I make to this board, and I did on 4chan too. I only bump the highest quality threads.
File (): 50BDC1EC3489F8F0C7ADC234588F3606-139960.jpg
(136.7 KB, 1280x720, E0g2jPuN2Kg.jpg)
>"We haven't been to space." U.S.S.R. Cosmonaut Igor Volk (Confirmed)
>Does the fact that former U.S.S.R. cosmonaut Igor Volk admitting in 2014 that no one has been to space prove the earth is flat? Well, not necessarily, but it certainly evinces that all claims related to space are fake and it demolishes the number one proof of the globe. Furthermore, it proves that BIG lies are not only possible but are happening right now.
>The space deception is everywhere and permeates all major institutions including academia, enforcement agencies, governments, media, and religious institutions.
>This information from a brave whistleblower should be shared everywhere! Everyone should know the name Igor Volk.
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/we-haven't-been-to-space.-u.s.s.r.:8
Mirrors:
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YB3AW9BNNM42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0g2jPuN2Kg
>Does the fact that former U.S.S.R. cosmonaut Igor Volk admitting in 2014 that no one has been to space prove the earth is flat? Well, not necessarily, but it certainly evinces that all claims related to space are fake and it demolishes the number one proof of the globe. Furthermore, it proves that BIG lies are not only possible but are happening right now.
>The space deception is everywhere and permeates all major institutions including academia, enforcement agencies, governments, media, and religious institutions.
>This information from a brave whistleblower should be shared everywhere! Everyone should know the name Igor Volk.
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/we-haven't-been-to-space.-u.s.s.r.:8
Mirrors:
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=YB3AW9BNNM42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0g2jPuN2Kg
>>167172
>number one proof of the globe
People knew the earth was round even before we ever got to space.
>number one proof of the globe
People knew the earth was round even before we ever got to space.
>>167175
People were actually told that this realm is not a plane.
To believe that lie doesn't change reality.
People were actually told that this realm is not a plane.
To believe that lie doesn't change reality.
File (): 7C4CB3BF77B5416500E06D1CDFA0A0CD-172133.jpg
(168.1 KB, 758x1466, hoax.jpeg)
>The Russians Call Out NASA
>The former head of Russia’s Roscosmos space agency, Dmitry Rogozin, has expressed doubt that the US Apollo 11 mission really landed on the Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive proof.
https://voxday.net/2023/05/08/the-russians-call-out-nasa/
https://www.rt.com/russia/575937-roscosmos-rogozin-us-moon-landing-proof/
>The former head of Russia’s Roscosmos space agency, Dmitry Rogozin, has expressed doubt that the US Apollo 11 mission really landed on the Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive proof.
https://voxday.net/2023/05/08/the-russians-call-out-nasa/
https://www.rt.com/russia/575937-roscosmos-rogozin-us-moon-landing-proof/
>>167182
no, you can do the experiments for yourself. unfortunately, it does require leaving your mom's house
no, you can do the experiments for yourself. unfortunately, it does require leaving your mom's house
File (): C3F0F74337B072A0BD9E704E06687838-131593.png
(128.5 KB, 724x611, wojak - smug.png)
>>167309
how far is the moon from the Earth? (I already know what your answer will be but I want you to say it)
how far is the moon from the Earth? (I already know what your answer will be but I want you to say it)
>>167310
>how far is the moon from the Earth?
What a disappointment. I was expecting you to describe the experiments.
>how far is the moon from the Earth?
What a disappointment. I was expecting you to describe the experiments.
File (): 3A5E98696276DEEC3D84A24D68966D0C-930613.png
(908.8 KB, 1356x742, Sc3035.png)
>The Flat Earth Metabunk Debunk - Eric Dubay vs Joe Rogan
>The famous UFC commentator believes that people believe the flat earth theory for the fun of it. He said, “Cos’ it’s fun. It’s fun to think you know things that other people don’t know.” He added, “It’s fun to think that everybody else is a sheep and that you understand the firmament that there is this glass cover. The stars are just light in the sky [and] earth is the center of everything, God’s in control of the whole ride.”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/haDW701NxHFb/
>The famous UFC commentator believes that people believe the flat earth theory for the fun of it. He said, “Cos’ it’s fun. It’s fun to think you know things that other people don’t know.” He added, “It’s fun to think that everybody else is a sheep and that you understand the firmament that there is this glass cover. The stars are just light in the sky [and] earth is the center of everything, God’s in control of the whole ride.”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/haDW701NxHFb/
File (): 8EDD03F48FF0F12F3578F017A1039E65-27963.jpg
(27.3 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg)
>Joe Rogan's Moon Hoax Mystery
>Many years ago Joe Rogan was a passionate and outspoken critic of NASA in general and the Apollo moon landing hoax in particular. He exposed the hoax on Mancow, debated and schooled "Bad Astronomer" Phil Plait and "Bullshit's" Penn Jillette. Then suddenly, with no explanation, shortly after getting his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show on Sci-Fi, Joe did a complete 180 and changed from unequivocally saying "there is no way people landed on the Moon," to saying "there is no way it was a hoax!" In the following video, his best friend Eddie Bravo calls Joe out on this clear, unexpected and mysterious change of heart, saying, "Joe, you used to be the Moon hoax crusader, then something happened. What happened, Joe? What happened?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AfT4saCiRg
>Many years ago Joe Rogan was a passionate and outspoken critic of NASA in general and the Apollo moon landing hoax in particular. He exposed the hoax on Mancow, debated and schooled "Bad Astronomer" Phil Plait and "Bullshit's" Penn Jillette. Then suddenly, with no explanation, shortly after getting his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show on Sci-Fi, Joe did a complete 180 and changed from unequivocally saying "there is no way people landed on the Moon," to saying "there is no way it was a hoax!" In the following video, his best friend Eddie Bravo calls Joe out on this clear, unexpected and mysterious change of heart, saying, "Joe, you used to be the Moon hoax crusader, then something happened. What happened, Joe? What happened?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AfT4saCiRg
File (): 13966F807ED2914F41A76F41CB4E9E9B-24879.jpg
(24.3 KB, 640x360, UjLe5cKrZ2hg_640x360.jpg)
>Joe Rogan and Neil DeGrasse Tyson vs. Eric Dubay and Eddie Bravo
>Many years ago before having his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show and before JRE was the world's biggest podcast, Joe Rogan was a vocal proponent exposing NASA's Moon landing hoax. He debated Penn Gillette, Phil Plait, Mancow, and many others brilliantly explaining the problems and inconsistencies with NASA's supposed Moon landings. Then one day, around Joe's Sci-Fi channel show premier, he had NASA spokesman Neil Degrasse Tyson on his podcast, praised him to a sycophantic degree, and back-peddled 180 degrees on his Moon hoax stance from stating unequivocally that (and I quote) "there is no way we went to the Moon," to stating equally unequivocally that, "there is no way that it was a hoax." Since this hypocritical 180, Joe has continued to have Neil Tyson and other establishment shills on his show, while simultaneously silencing and condemning people with anti-establishment views like his best friend Eddie Bravo. In the following video you will see Joe arrogantly, aggressively, and disrespectfully ridiculing and attempting to silence Eddie from speaking his mind about NASA, Flat Earth, Dinosaurs, Chemtrails, and other topics which Joe has clearly become a gate-keeper for.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UjLe5cKrZ2hg/
>Many years ago before having his own "Joe Rogan Questions Everything" TV show and before JRE was the world's biggest podcast, Joe Rogan was a vocal proponent exposing NASA's Moon landing hoax. He debated Penn Gillette, Phil Plait, Mancow, and many others brilliantly explaining the problems and inconsistencies with NASA's supposed Moon landings. Then one day, around Joe's Sci-Fi channel show premier, he had NASA spokesman Neil Degrasse Tyson on his podcast, praised him to a sycophantic degree, and back-peddled 180 degrees on his Moon hoax stance from stating unequivocally that (and I quote) "there is no way we went to the Moon," to stating equally unequivocally that, "there is no way that it was a hoax." Since this hypocritical 180, Joe has continued to have Neil Tyson and other establishment shills on his show, while simultaneously silencing and condemning people with anti-establishment views like his best friend Eddie Bravo. In the following video you will see Joe arrogantly, aggressively, and disrespectfully ridiculing and attempting to silence Eddie from speaking his mind about NASA, Flat Earth, Dinosaurs, Chemtrails, and other topics which Joe has clearly become a gate-keeper for.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UjLe5cKrZ2hg/
File (): 3508A563A401A7702EBF83BB5A2E4839-135114.jpg
(131.9 KB, 1280x720, v maxresdefault.jpg)
File (): 6070E6F6068DBA121059BDD219C2649B-1205925.png
(1.2 MB, 1366x716, vScreenshot_20230523_232156.png)
File (): 25760314A8BE671E6D329AAEB3C8F862-850234.png
(830.3 KB, 1290x562, vScreenshot_20230523_232434.png)
File (): B94D23BC499EF22EBC5BA882C6AAE341-56245.jpg
(54.9 KB, 1280x720, vv maxresdefault.jpg)
>Night Sky - When Lasers hit the Firmament [ 4K ]
>Scientists claim that they are using the most powerful lasers in the world to project an artificial star in the mesosphere for telescopes.
>They claim that a very thin layer of sodium is excited to glow.
>The problem here, the laser stops abruptly at a barrier. This is not possible, no matter with which wavelength.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maBf0H3UNJI
Mirrors (no 4K):
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/night-sky-when-lasers-hit-the-firmament:8
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tLrZ7GtYXK8M/
Beautiful night sky and music.
-----
The scientific lecture from 2010 explaining the physics of lasers. Then the NASA's claim of what they are doing is bullshit.
>Lene Hau: "Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Lecture, fall 2010
>Lene Hau, Harvard University
>Professor of Physics and Applied Physics :
>"Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Light pulses are slowed in ultra-cold atom clouds to bicycle speed: 24 km/hour, which is 50 million times lower than the light speed in vacuum. In the process the pulses spatially compress by the same large factor, from 1 km to only 0.02 mm at which point they fit entirely within the atom cloud. A light pulse can then be completely stopped for several milliseconds. In our more recent experiments, we take matters further: We stop and extinguish a light pulse in one part of space and revive it in a completely different location. The experiments create a new paradigm for control and inter-conversion of light and matter.... and the secret behind the trick will be revealed in the talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFx8m41QWM
>Scientists claim that they are using the most powerful lasers in the world to project an artificial star in the mesosphere for telescopes.
>They claim that a very thin layer of sodium is excited to glow.
>The problem here, the laser stops abruptly at a barrier. This is not possible, no matter with which wavelength.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maBf0H3UNJI
Mirrors (no 4K):
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/night-sky-when-lasers-hit-the-firmament:8
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tLrZ7GtYXK8M/
Beautiful night sky and music.
-----
The scientific lecture from 2010 explaining the physics of lasers. Then the NASA's claim of what they are doing is bullshit.
>Lene Hau: "Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Lecture, fall 2010
>Lene Hau, Harvard University
>Professor of Physics and Applied Physics :
>"Quantum control of light and matter - from the macroscopic to the nanoscale"
>Light pulses are slowed in ultra-cold atom clouds to bicycle speed: 24 km/hour, which is 50 million times lower than the light speed in vacuum. In the process the pulses spatially compress by the same large factor, from 1 km to only 0.02 mm at which point they fit entirely within the atom cloud. A light pulse can then be completely stopped for several milliseconds. In our more recent experiments, we take matters further: We stop and extinguish a light pulse in one part of space and revive it in a completely different location. The experiments create a new paradigm for control and inter-conversion of light and matter.... and the secret behind the trick will be revealed in the talk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFx8m41QWM
File (): AC867880D22231784B5E21A896045A53-70557.jpg
(68.9 KB, 1280x720, bullshit.jpg)
File (): FD81DE245561DFFDAA9755B9649C3F1D-12599.jpg
(12.3 KB, 300x168, lab-rats-science.jpg)
The "Official™" "Experts™" and "Scientists™" claim that stallions can get pregnant, while some claim that only mares can get pregnant - that alone proves that if you truly want or need to know something, it's better to go on the (possibly years long) journey to find out for yourself.
The bigger question is this: are you getting genuine value for your limited and dwindling time and energy spent, by trying to figure out which "scientist™" or "expert™" to trust, and would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
The bigger question is this: are you getting genuine value for your limited and dwindling time and energy spent, by trying to figure out which "scientist™" or "expert™" to trust, and would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
File (): B814998EBB959B8A7BFBA1C5BEFF8E97-140280.jpg
(137.0 KB, 750x750, 7d4d03348f.jpg)
>>167443
>would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
It is not only the lie, but what lies behind it.
>would you be getting genuine value in working out beyond any doubt what shape or size the Earth truly is?
It is not only the lie, but what lies behind it.
File (): 3ED450CF99FD7A0FED9C49A84B738AF6-582756.jpg
(569.1 KB, 1656x1500, Happy_Siblings.jpg)
>>167444
My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc. who would otherwise have more time and energy to find out exactly who the enemies actually are, and what other tricks they use.
Also, these "bones" for the goyim to chew on and fight over help fine-tune the enemy's tactics and help them find out the identities of any actual threats who they feel need to be "dealt with" specifically.
I realise that not everyone can stare the monster in the eye directly and needs to use less intimidating subjects and battles to sharpen their skills, but at least be aware that you're choosing to fight inside the terrarium/pen/cage that was set up for you, by the enemy you're trying to outsmart.
The world has existed every day for at least 6000 years - it's not that important to know what shape it is, and arguing over it won't reveal all that much of those who set up the subject for people/stallions/etc. to argue over. That's what I'm Saiyan here. Sorry to be a killjoy, no fun allowed etc., feel free to ignore if need be.
Nevertheless, this argument isn't much different to the "infinite genders" deception: First there were two sexes (easy-peasy so far), then a "jew" came along and changed that to "genders" and people started accepting the new term, so now there are two genders, well since "gender" can now mean what those "jews" who introduced the term want it to mean they can then introduce additional genders and even change the original meaning of that word - further removing people from the actual reality that there still are and always only were two sexes! What's the point of arguing how many genders there are, when there are only two sexes and everything else is a work of "jewish" fiction? (Besides sharpening skills without directly confronting the monster, which could be done in all kinds of other ways.)
Just be aware of the artificially-created cage one enters by taking part in these arguments. One of the first steps of introducing (((communism))) is to remove the "goyim" from a benevolent higher power so they become confused and lost, and then have them fighting/killing each other over artificially-introduced belief-systems.
My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc. who would otherwise have more time and energy to find out exactly who the enemies actually are, and what other tricks they use.
Also, these "bones" for the goyim to chew on and fight over help fine-tune the enemy's tactics and help them find out the identities of any actual threats who they feel need to be "dealt with" specifically.
I realise that not everyone can stare the monster in the eye directly and needs to use less intimidating subjects and battles to sharpen their skills, but at least be aware that you're choosing to fight inside the terrarium/pen/cage that was set up for you, by the enemy you're trying to outsmart.
The world has existed every day for at least 6000 years - it's not that important to know what shape it is, and arguing over it won't reveal all that much of those who set up the subject for people/stallions/etc. to argue over. That's what I'm Saiyan here. Sorry to be a killjoy, no fun allowed etc., feel free to ignore if need be.
Nevertheless, this argument isn't much different to the "infinite genders" deception: First there were two sexes (easy-peasy so far), then a "jew" came along and changed that to "genders" and people started accepting the new term, so now there are two genders, well since "gender" can now mean what those "jews" who introduced the term want it to mean they can then introduce additional genders and even change the original meaning of that word - further removing people from the actual reality that there still are and always only were two sexes! What's the point of arguing how many genders there are, when there are only two sexes and everything else is a work of "jewish" fiction? (Besides sharpening skills without directly confronting the monster, which could be done in all kinds of other ways.)
Just be aware of the artificially-created cage one enters by taking part in these arguments. One of the first steps of introducing (((communism))) is to remove the "goyim" from a benevolent higher power so they become confused and lost, and then have them fighting/killing each other over artificially-introduced belief-systems.
>>167443
>The "Official™" "Experts™" and "Scientists™" claim that stallions can get pregnant
Source? This doesn't sound like a settled topic.
>The "Official™" "Experts™" and "Scientists™" claim that stallions can get pregnant
Source? This doesn't sound like a settled topic.
>>167450
Oh, sorry I don't have a source on that statement right now, but the Science is Settled™ regardless. :3
Oh, sorry I don't have a source on that statement right now, but the Science is Settled™ regardless. :3
File (): DBCF0AC489554BCF00FF072344EEDA25-272695.png
(266.3 KB, 890x897, eldX3QE.png)
>>167447
>My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc.
Rebuking heliocentrism is not new and hadn't been introduced by any enemy. It is all the contrary, heliocentrism is a hoax pushed by masons and jesuits.
Also it shouldn't be any infighting if the fags would had any STEM knowledge to follow science and understand that have been duped. This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.
>My point is that this particular lie/psyop/subject was introduced by the enemy specifically to cause confusion and infighting among people/stallions/etc.
Rebuking heliocentrism is not new and hadn't been introduced by any enemy. It is all the contrary, heliocentrism is a hoax pushed by masons and jesuits.
Also it shouldn't be any infighting if the fags would had any STEM knowledge to follow science and understand that have been duped. This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.
>>167452
>This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.
If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road. Therefore, they'd rather just get a quick dopamine fix by making a half-hearted post and going elsewhere. It's a possible explanation.
Learning which battles to pick is pretty important as time grows shorter.
Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth, with everything else that's going on? All that energy would be far better spent on exposing the Holocaust™ lie worldwide, for example. That would wake up far more people to some harsh truths and might inspire them into more productive and positive community-action than to hear that the Earth is different to what was always assumed. Whether round or flat or big or small, it's still going to be the same as yesterday or thousands of years ago, and knowing for certain won't stop the whitey-genocide and (((chicom-style))) prison system being built around us. Just Saiyan.
I guess each side of this argument/topic is frustrated for their own reasons, and that's too bad, especially since the discussion's been going on and being kept alive for so long.
>This thread contains tons of invaluable scientific data but it looks that cannot be understood by the regular anon, worst yet, they ignore the data and keep repeating propaganda.
If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road. Therefore, they'd rather just get a quick dopamine fix by making a half-hearted post and going elsewhere. It's a possible explanation.
Learning which battles to pick is pretty important as time grows shorter.
Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth, with everything else that's going on? All that energy would be far better spent on exposing the Holocaust™ lie worldwide, for example. That would wake up far more people to some harsh truths and might inspire them into more productive and positive community-action than to hear that the Earth is different to what was always assumed. Whether round or flat or big or small, it's still going to be the same as yesterday or thousands of years ago, and knowing for certain won't stop the whitey-genocide and (((chicom-style))) prison system being built around us. Just Saiyan.
I guess each side of this argument/topic is frustrated for their own reasons, and that's too bad, especially since the discussion's been going on and being kept alive for so long.
>>167453
>If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road.
Okay, now you make sense. You are in the wrong thread anon.
>If that's the case, then perhaps most people/stallions/etc. know on some level that there are bigger things to worry about, and that investing real time and energy into this discussion is going to hurt them down the road.
Okay, now you make sense. You are in the wrong thread anon.
>>167453
I disagree that this is such a time sink. No one has an optimized schedule anyway.
Could you indulge in thought experiment for just a moment? Imagine that the earth actually is flat; and you look out at the horizon and think how it doesn't bend but continue on forever, you look up at the sun see that it's close so that's why it's rays spreads across the world, and you ponder what the stars can be if they aren't suns lightyears away; do you think this would not change you?
I disagree that this is such a time sink. No one has an optimized schedule anyway.
Could you indulge in thought experiment for just a moment? Imagine that the earth actually is flat; and you look out at the horizon and think how it doesn't bend but continue on forever, you look up at the sun see that it's close so that's why it's rays spreads across the world, and you ponder what the stars can be if they aren't suns lightyears away; do you think this would not change you?
>>167453
>Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth
>to get consensus
To hell with consensus, that is anti-science and revolting to the truth.
>Yes this is a dedicated Flat Earth thread, but is it really THAT important to get consensus on the shape and size of the Earth
>to get consensus
To hell with consensus, that is anti-science and revolting to the truth.
[Reply]
[Last 50 Posts]
[Last 100 Posts]
[Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1950] [1951-2000] [2001-2050] [2051-2100] [2101-2150] [2151-2200] [2201-2250] [2251-2300] [2301-2350] [2351-2400] [2401-2450] [2451-2500] [2501-2550] [2551-2600] [2601-2650] [2651-2700] [2701-2750] [2751-2770] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
2770 replies |
1431 files |
277 UUIDs |
Page 5