This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg (859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif (6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2224 replies and 1111 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.168732
>>168731
Well, first of all, they are visibly curved in those pics, just not curved in any particular direction: these lines are hardly ever straight in the first place, so you wouldn't notice the curve even if they were there.
Second of all, they're not long enough to see visible curvature for the same exact reason why you can't see the cube of the horizon.
Well, first of all, they are visibly curved in those pics, just not curved in any particular direction: these lines are hardly ever straight in the first place, so you wouldn't notice the curve even if they were there.
Second of all, they're not long enough to see visible curvature for the same exact reason why you can't see the cube of the horizon.
File (): 7525A2CE84F66DBE0755B1A8ED11EDBB-929931.jpg (908.1 KB, 671x3453, dvdled.jpeg)
File (): C3F1CC53E5F47CD7EAAFD75B927F3356-654636.png (639.3 KB, 1280x720, 49f52d64960b23f9d9b806897d1e233e.png)
>NASA shows sportsmanship by congratulating India on beating the US to the moon's South Pole - BUT Russia and China stay silent after the Chandrayaan-3 craft makes history
>India has landed on the moon's South Pole - an unmapped region of the surface
>The nation now joins Russia, China and the US in landing on the moon
>Chandrayaan-3 will determine if water ice is hiding in the South Pole region
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12436887/Indias-Chandrayaan-3-makes-history-landing-moons-South-Pole-time-beating-Russia-China-USA.html
Yeah, right.
The NASA moon mission v2.0, shitskin version is soooooooo credible. Nevertheless that space does not exist, but the normie has to be fed more illusions.
>India has landed on the moon's South Pole - an unmapped region of the surface
>The nation now joins Russia, China and the US in landing on the moon
>Chandrayaan-3 will determine if water ice is hiding in the South Pole region
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12436887/Indias-Chandrayaan-3-makes-history-landing-moons-South-Pole-time-beating-Russia-China-USA.html
Yeah, right.
The NASA moon mission v2.0, shitskin version is soooooooo credible. Nevertheless that space does not exist, but the normie has to be fed more illusions.
>>168967
Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week. It was probably rushed out because they wanted to do it before the Pajeets (not to mention budget cuts in favor of the Ukraine war), and now they're embarrassed at letting street-shitters beat them in rocket science because.
China isn't saying anything because they don't want to acknowledge that the Pajeets might rival them in technology, since they've been wanting to land there as well. Their relationship with India is also fairly adversarial, despite trying to cooperate with BRICS.
Unless you're implying that Russia and China are only staying silent because they don't want to corroborate the concept that space is real? It's a bit late for that, as they both have their own space programs. They're
>The NASA moon mission v2.0
Which mission? There were several.
Also you're giving NASA too much credit. NASA hasn't been able to land any probes on the moon's south pole. They lost to Pajeets. It's kind of a big deal in the world of space expeditios, because the moon's south pole's potential for water and minerals may make it a site of interest for future operations.
Of course, I don't expect you to believe anything about what I just said. I'm just commenting on the news for anyone else who has to see it the next time this thread gets bumped.
Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week. It was probably rushed out because they wanted to do it before the Pajeets (not to mention budget cuts in favor of the Ukraine war), and now they're embarrassed at letting street-shitters beat them in rocket science because.
China isn't saying anything because they don't want to acknowledge that the Pajeets might rival them in technology, since they've been wanting to land there as well. Their relationship with India is also fairly adversarial, despite trying to cooperate with BRICS.
Unless you're implying that Russia and China are only staying silent because they don't want to corroborate the concept that space is real? It's a bit late for that, as they both have their own space programs. They're
>The NASA moon mission v2.0
Which mission? There were several.
Also you're giving NASA too much credit. NASA hasn't been able to land any probes on the moon's south pole. They lost to Pajeets. It's kind of a big deal in the world of space expeditios, because the moon's south pole's potential for water and minerals may make it a site of interest for future operations.
Of course, I don't expect you to believe anything about what I just said. I'm just commenting on the news for anyone else who has to see it the next time this thread gets bumped.
File (): E53F52A8E45B26745EF9F356B1C70844-151427.jpg (147.9 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)
>Chandrayaan-3 - More of India's CGI Moon Landing
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/chandrayaan-3-more-of-india's-cgi-moon:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPJQp3tTGI
These masons are getting more absurd by the day.
https://odysee.com/@EddieAlencar:a/chandrayaan-3-more-of-india's-cgi-moon:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPJQp3tTGI
These masons are getting more absurd by the day.
>>168971
>Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week.
And you believe them. /s
C'mon we are well beyond the "just trust us" point.
>China isn't saying anything
Anon, all space agencies are ran by the same hoaxers.
>Russia is "silent" because their own mission to the lunar south failed last week.
And you believe them. /s
C'mon we are well beyond the "just trust us" point.
>China isn't saying anything
Anon, all space agencies are ran by the same hoaxers.
File (): 98C6A535B5E884BC83858D51CDDA5F25-74564.jpg (72.8 KB, 596x727, U452d.jpeg)
I know the shitskins are a joke, but if they for real released this CGI then there is not hope for them.
https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1695415299774849291
https://twitter.com/TNTJohn1717/status/1695415299774849291
File (): 1508D0D1AFF8057DED235F7D23A73691-494488.mp4 (482.9 KB, Resolution:360x480 Length:00:00:16, The India Moon Landing .mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.169052
>>169049
Where is this video from? I can't find it anywhere.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tXbH6E8vDsg
All the pics I of earth I'm finding from the mission look something like the link above.
Where is this video from? I can't find it anywhere.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tXbH6E8vDsg
All the pics I of earth I'm finding from the mission look something like the link above.
>>169048
Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
>And you believe them.
What is there to believe if they didn't say anything?
Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
>And you believe them.
What is there to believe if they didn't say anything?
File (): F29C5096B57E564582BC84FF8AD519E2-1088577.jpg (1.0 MB, 1366x4262, Untitled.jpeg)
>>169053
>Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
Cos that's the point of this hoax and narrative. The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west. Both Russia and China are main branches of the NWO, and they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight.
It is all smoke and mirrors to shape further the mind of the masses.
>Why did you bring up their silence if it's not relevant?
Cos that's the point of this hoax and narrative. The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west. Both Russia and China are main branches of the NWO, and they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight.
It is all smoke and mirrors to shape further the mind of the masses.
Anonymous
No.169057
>>169056
>they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight
If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
>they are making room for a minor branch to come under the spotlight
If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
>>169055
I've been to YouTube. I'm asking where that footage in particular comes from. Idk if it's even part of the same project.
I've been to YouTube. I'm asking where that footage in particular comes from. Idk if it's even part of the same project.
Anonymous
No.169060
>>169056
>The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west.
Russia and China are not the west.
>The rise of the third world and the sinking into oblivion of the west.
Russia and China are not the west.
Anonymous
No.169062
>>169058
>If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
A public concession it looks to me.
>If they meant to make room, why wouldn't they publicly congratulate India?
A public concession it looks to me.
>>169061
My digging led me to the conclusion that this is a completely unrelated video. If you have evidence to the contrary, do share.
My digging led me to the conclusion that this is a completely unrelated video. If you have evidence to the contrary, do share.
Anonymous
No.169086
File (): 4AF9CA62F25C8F699D93D2837DBB73BD-1065505.mp4 (1.0 MB, Resolution:460x480 Length:00:00:20, Its like 1969 again.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.169199
File (): 7DB51565384633C3EA2744839CF5B003-18116673.mp4 (17.3 MB, Resolution:540x720 Length:00:03:46, Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Eric Dubay discusses the truth about the (local) moon.
Anonymous
No.169200
File (): FD4031442FFB68E2FA65BACF567C20EA-6213655.mp4 (5.9 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:01:03, an object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.mp4) [play once] [loop]
An object transiting the surface of the local, possibly-plasma, moon.
Weird.
Weird.
Anonymous
No.169201
File (): D5051F89369C72ABDA6022CFF310FA21-2266818.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:406x720 Length:00:00:41, indias hoax.mp4) [play once] [loop]
File (): 0C94CCB891BA5920BD2E5084FAA56700-42280.jpg (41.3 KB, 416x528, 11365a0cb7366cf9.jpg)
Anonymous
No.169413
>>169412
Both can be done easily with ISO400 in case you are wondering. This is coming from somefag that entered into a dark room before.
Both can be done easily with ISO400 in case you are wondering. This is coming from somefag that entered into a dark room before.
File (): 7260976CFEDDE525911A8C2F74858647-264131.png (257.9 KB, 1165x598, Screenshot_20230925_122004.png)
>>169416
Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes? You think that proves anything that hasn't already been said?
Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes? You think that proves anything that hasn't already been said?
File (): 523E60B4D6BB18DA6857015F183E340D-205764.png (200.9 KB, 1415x1630, 523E60B4D6BB18DA6857015F183E340D-205764.png)
>>169417
>Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes?
Actually is kinda charity I'm doing with you. By helping you to see what you refuse to see, I'm doing doing the Lord's will. Even if I only get scorn in return.
>Do you feel clever screenshotting the same post that I can already see in front of my own eyes?
Actually is kinda charity I'm doing with you. By helping you to see what you refuse to see, I'm doing doing the Lord's will. Even if I only get scorn in return.
>>169418
I can already see it quite well. I just disagree with your implication.
You can see this stuff on earth. If you look down at a salt flats from the top of the hill, the white plane looks so bright it's blinding to look on that direction, but if you're standing in the middle of the flats it looks normal and unremarkable.
I can already see it quite well. I just disagree with your implication.
You can see this stuff on earth. If you look down at a salt flats from the top of the hill, the white plane looks so bright it's blinding to look on that direction, but if you're standing in the middle of the flats it looks normal and unremarkable.
Anonymous
No.169459
File (): FF086548756079B703D8075A599CF319-4199004.mp4 (4.0 MB, Resolution:480x854 Length:00:00:47, the_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
File (): 9E736FAD48AC4736A66F070F2D0D97B6-1297383.webm (1.2 MB, Resolution:1080x1080 Length:00:00:10, 1696341091543783.webm) [play once] [loop]
File (): B70E8E1488BE5436ABA0A74080119D00-10144151.png (9.7 MB, 3609x3753, e9958a6.png)
Anonymous
No.169465
File (): 139208B43C40FC951EC61284411F41FC-1457321.mp4 (1.4 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:08, 1696340365873372.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>169464
It doesn't because you picked the most extreme case to explain tons of geographical anomalies that doesn't add up.
And your video doesn't debunk anything by the way, it only shows that that particular route can take another path.
It doesn't because you picked the most extreme case to explain tons of geographical anomalies that doesn't add up.
And your video doesn't debunk anything by the way, it only shows that that particular route can take another path.
>>169466
>it only shows that that particular route can take another path
Then why would they all have similar durations?
>it only shows that that particular route can take another path
Then why would they all have similar durations?
File (): 02FD8F02016CCD803797D2F65FA8EC70-637293.png (622.4 KB, 759x750, Screenshot_20231003_222056.png)
>>169467
>Regardless, the flight path is only feasible on a round planet.
Wrong. That particular path is feasible in both realms, this is why the faggot doing the video picked that route.
>>169468
>Then why would they all have similar durations?
Take a look to your own video, the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
>Regardless, the flight path is only feasible on a round planet.
Wrong. That particular path is feasible in both realms, this is why the faggot doing the video picked that route.
>>169468
>Then why would they all have similar durations?
Take a look to your own video, the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
>>169469
>the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Take a long look at it and see how the paths vary greatly in distance on the flat model.
>the answer is right in front of your eyes, fren.
Take a long look at it and see how the paths vary greatly in distance on the flat model.
>>169472
It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model, and yet the flight path is similar in duration to all the others.
It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model, and yet the flight path is similar in duration to all the others.
>>169473
>It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model,
I presuming you are referring to the arc over the Pacific ocean, then you may ask to the faggot who draw the arc on the map instead of straight line over or alongside the Americas.
>It's completely clear that the path that flies over Sydney is much longer on the flat model,
I presuming you are referring to the arc over the Pacific ocean, then you may ask to the faggot who draw the arc on the map instead of straight line over or alongside the Americas.
>>169474
The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl. It passes over Sydney, Aukland, and Santiago, and arrives in it's destination at a similar time to all the other paths.
This picture demonstrates that you can leave Jakarta in any direction and still get to Bogota in an similar amount of time because all the paths are the same distance.
This isn't possible on flat earth: Flights with paths closer to the south pole (or "ice wall") would be drastically longer, as shown in the map.
The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl. It passes over Sydney, Aukland, and Santiago, and arrives in it's destination at a similar time to all the other paths.
This picture demonstrates that you can leave Jakarta in any direction and still get to Bogota in an similar amount of time because all the paths are the same distance.
This isn't possible on flat earth: Flights with paths closer to the south pole (or "ice wall") would be drastically longer, as shown in the map.
File (): 6BF05B6B141F28B1F4DFC508967457B6-624351.png (609.7 KB, 759x750, 02FD8F02016CCD803797D2F65FA8EC70-637293.png)
>>169476
>The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl
And how you know that is IRL? Pilots themselves have discovered that instruments lie to them, more on this soon...
>The line is drawn that way because that's the path it takes irl
And how you know that is IRL? Pilots themselves have discovered that instruments lie to them, more on this soon...
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1950] [1951-2000] [2001-2050] [2051-2100] [2101-2150] [2151-2200] [2201-2250] [2251-2274] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
2274 replies | 1136 files | 235 UUIDs | Page 1