This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2720 replies and 1408 files omitted.
>Proving the Sun Rotates Over a Flat Earth - Must See Evidence by Corey Kell>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfesthttps://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
>>166098>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
>>166127Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
>>166129>They're not illegal.In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
>>166134Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
>>166133Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
>>166128Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
>>166133No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
>>166154Is this a reference to an actual thing?
This bread is getting slow. Let's have some good old fashioned
plane facts.
>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earthhttps://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:cMirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY>>166155Given that space is a hoax, it has to be a satire.
>>166158Prove that your cock isn't microscopic.
>>166162>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
>>166163He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
Let us rattle this circus a bit.
Debunking a globe believer on travels to Antarctica.
>>166243Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
>>166244Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
>>166243He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.
As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
>>166246>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidenceThat's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
>>166247It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
>>166248I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
>>166249Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
>>166250The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
>>166251So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.
So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
>>166252>It must be flat because you can't get thereNope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
>>166253Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
>>166254>possible alien crash siteThink about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
>>166255You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
>>166256>You aren't understanding meYes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
>>166257If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.
Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
>>166258>If you understand, answer me.Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
>>166259Maybe you will "bite" aka respond to my actual problem with your model now?
>>166260>pulling rankNope. I will stay on my track. Sorry.
>>166261Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
>>166262>lashing outOkay so.
I wait for my punishment as I am not willing to comply.
As you wish. Rule #7 Maybe OP could have been more approachable when it came to the subject. Well, it was intresting as long as it lasted, thanks OP for the thread.
>>166262Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much>even too much for the values that position founds>not even an iota of effortImpressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful.
Only difference is predicting what they will do next. So as a violation of rule 7 what will happen to the thread? Will it be deleted/closed?
>>166273Nothing, he just got cockblocked by lotuz
>>166263>>166273It's not just rule 7, it's also rule 9, tbh.
Odd, I seem to recall getting shouted down to the point of censure for trying to apply the site rules to this thread, and illustrating OP's bad-faith.
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it