/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2734 replies and 1387 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.171194
1318817391452.jpg
>>171190
>BTW - the ultimate authority Jesus Christ/God, says the earth is ROUND!
Citation needed.
Anonymous
No.171195
E-xmpOTVcAY05JY.jpg
>>171190
The serpent does not bow to death. It shall not bow to censorship either.
Jokes aside. I've heard the bible allured to the idea the earth was round. Do post about it.
Anonymous
No.171200
171203 171204
ff3186518c8c45f53fe2ff5baf720966--a-compass-a-circle.jpg
>>171190
Anonymous
No.171203
172526
>>171200
There is no dome mentioned at that reference. Everything else also describes a sphere. Thanks for another boomer post instead of actual arguments.
Anonymous
No.171204
172526
>>171200
Also, the image stretches some of these references by a huge margin.

The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.

As in He established the earth and it can't be undone, aka no one can move it away. But sure, interpret that as it can't rotate. Delusions are better than understanding after all.
Anonymous
No.171205
171206 171211
Screenshot_20240227_230258.jpg
Why my post has been deleted? Hah?
Censorship only shows you are afraid of what others have to say.
Anonymous
No.171206
171207
>>171205
Aren't you ban-evading right now?
Anonymous
No.171207
171208
>>171206
Dude, I'm not banned. I did nothing wrong. What kind of paranoid are you?
Anonymous
No.171208
171209
>>171207
Post above imply that. Idk though.
Anonymous
No.171209
>>171208
Post above is my appreciation of a behavioral pattern that has been increasing form 4 years ago.
Anonymous
No.171211
>>171205
The Jew cries out as he strikes you.
Anonymous
No.172428
172430 172434 172438
34tarefdz.jpg
Different Earth rotational velocity is inconsistent with an uniform gravity.jpg
Different Earth rotational velocity is inconsistent with an uniform gravity force.
Anonymous
No.172430
172433
>>172428
Those are linear speeds.
Do you not know how circumference works?
Anonymous
No.172433
172436
530105902.jpg
>>172430
>Those are linear speeds
You forgot to name the centrifugal forces involved.
Anonymous
No.172434
172435 172526
>>172428
You clearly don't know how gravity works.
Anonymous
No.172435
172436
>>172434
You literally are a liberal arts chump with no grasp of physics.
Anonymous
No.172436
172438
>>172433
>centrifugal forces
Centrifugal force is an illusion. It's a term use to describe phenomena created by centripetal force. There is no force that pushes the object outward, only in one linear direction towards the horizon.
It's barely relevant to gravitational pull, but it is present. That's why they launch rockets from Florida: to benefit from the speed of the Earth's rotation closer to the equator.
>>172435
I'm an engineer, you stupid nigger.
Anonymous
No.172438
172439
>>172436
>I'm an engineer, you stupid nigger.
It shows, it shows....
If you are unable to grasp the significance of >>172428
then there is not much else to say.
Anonymous
No.172439
172440
>>172438
It is you who does not grasp it.
The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet. You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push, when really it's just an illusion created by linear velocity and centripetal force.
And you're unable to grasp this because you can't even grasp the middle school level physics concept that centrifugal force isn't actually real.
Anonymous
No.172440
172441
>>172439
>The difference in linear speeds at different degrees at different latitudes shouldn't have any visible impact on the inward gravitational pull towards the center of the planet.
It SHOULD.
>You're referencing centrifugal force as if it were an outward push
For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
Anonymous
No.172441
172443
3349836__explicit_artist-colon-mare_enjoyer_oc_oconly_oc-colon-littlepip_pony_unicorn_falloutequestria_anatomicallycorrect_anus_blushing_buttblush_clothes_c.png
>>172440
>For practical purposes it is and is counterbalancing the "theoretical" gravitational push.
It literally isn't though. Your own post demonstrates that it doesn't.
>It SHOULD.
Why would it? It's a perpendicular velocity, not an opposite one.
Anonymous
No.172443
172445 172446
Centrifugal.jpg
>>172441
>It literally isn't though.
I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity. But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
Anonymous
No.172445
2585983.png
>>172443
>I really feel tempted to fire up FreeCAD and show you, in 3D how a rotating pseudo sphere would have forces counter balancing the mythical gravity.
Do it.
>But that would be over the top and like to shoot a cannon at an insect.
Sounds like you're chicken.
Anonymous
No.172446
>>172443
BTW, in case you didn't notice, the meme makes the math to support your argument. That said, it is disingenuous as the ocean mass is humongous and actually makes my point.
Anonymous
No.172526
172580 172585
a4202011400_10.jpg
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172580
172586 172587
DF19F6ECE87CD3705E716DD0244EF2B0-101686.png
DF686283CB5A2B871D4024539B200595-546179.png
258665F7FDC09B6435418AC4C01446DD-13403.png
56365D2B33CECA501B74C0546CE04A7B-5533469.png
24F26A92DCE8490F421171CBEF67BA7A-744962.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172585
1714460366.mp4 (2.0 MB, Resolution:376x480 Length:00:01:07, NASA.mp4) [play once] [loop]
NASA.mp4
>>172526
The funny thing is that the hoax of the roundness of the plane is being exposed everywhere and "authoritative" men of science are looking like lying clowns.
Anonymous
No.172586
1 (1).JPEG
>>172580
>It's arched as in curved. You might say,
Relax anon.
Anonymous
No.172587
172589 172598
>>172580
>the math for gravity
now we wait for the actual part where you defend this, because you havent yet.
"math for gravity" is just the measurement of falling objects, objects tend to fall at an acceleration of ~9.8 meters per second. we can assume what is the cause, BUT this is an effect not cause. ofc im no saying flat earther theory on the cause is a air tight sealed theory, but neither is the CAUSE of gravity from the bending and warping of space-time, according to einstein

the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
Anonymous
No.172589
172590 172592 172595
IMG_3871.jpeg
>>172587
> the reason flat earthers become flat earthers (especially Christians you could say) is because we simply looked for curvature, couldnt find none, and no one has provided it yet. verifiable proof of the curvature should be simple and easy to do, given the confidence that so many hold for it.
Uh, I usually ignore this thread whenever I see it bumped, but…holy shit. I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.

This is a picture of the earth, taken from space more than fifty years ago. As you can see, it’s fucking round. End of discussion.

How has an argument about this subject been going on for three whole years? I mean, god damn.
Anonymous
No.172590
172593
7455986cda44f8db142fabc2c6a656c9.png
>>172589
>I honestly never realized there were people using this site who are actually this stupid.
>people
*Person
It's literally just one persistent retard.
He made this thread without IDs to disguise that it's just him bumping it all this time.
Anonymous
No.172592
0E45DF2B7F5B5D5C24A7FDD08AA21AE6-716971.png
9F4E9C660DAA9300E14EECA2808EC7C5-1291525.png
>>172589
There's no discussion despite best efforts. At the time it was shocking too, but then you realize it's just some retard who can't hold a conversation in any way.
One might just let the thread build up. Just more and more garbage of flatearth that didn't even make sense.
That nobody on the site wants.
There's no actual point being made despite appearances.
It's just one fucker shitting it up refusing all communication. Had that stupid fucker listened at the very beginning three to four years ago, he wouldn't have burned every bridge.
But no the fuck enjoys jumping to conclusions, and ignoring who somebody is, and if it really should be done in the first place.
Anonymous
No.172593
172597 172616
>>172590
>*person
Well, two at least. He did convert me with this thread.

Though, I kinda doubt the anon your replied to were serious. I mean, "I got pictures of it"? Eeh.
Anonymous
No.172595
172596
1710557434055974.png
1710557636610723.png
1710547516540608.jpg
1710557757214621m.jpg
image0.webp
>>172589
good goy
Anonymous
No.172596
172597 172599 172616
>>172595
Yh, that guy's post wasn't very mature I agree but I don't really like these memes either, despite believing in flat earth.

I think it's better to avoid insults but I can relate to retaliating with insults (I'm guilty of this myself) so I can understand. Still tho, I would advise against it. This way it is easier to convince others of your point when neither side has gotten hurt.
Anonymous
No.172597
172599
>>172593
>>172596
You're a reasonable anon, what arguments are actually convincing.
Because the other guy certainly won't.
Anonymous
No.172598
172599
>>172587
Have you ever heard of the Cavendish experiment?
The point is that in physics shows gravity works repeatably, it doesn't have to show the underlying meanings of why.
Although some observations about the nature of the event can be made its uncovering an aspect that is has.

You are able to design another Cavendish experiment accounting for all the minutia you want eliminated, fully documented so others can try. And then the results are shared, and differences or similarities are compared and why that occurs.
Human error is a crazy thing that has to be accounted for.
Anonymous
No.172599
172601 172602
>>172596
fuck that, used to have this same mentality, until i realized globetards are absolutely braindead dishonest people. dont go easy on them, they always give us shit for literally nothing.
dont get me wrong, I want to address every point in a mature matter whenever its needed, and thats what i do. nothing wrong with using memes to poing out logical inconsitencies, dont take offense to in and see the humor in it.
>>172597
globe has the burden of proof. please prove the existence of curvature without appealing to CGI/photo manipulation and fish eye lenses.
>>172598
henry cavendish was also a freemason, sure his experiment COULD deserve credit for demonstrating electrostatics. but not credit for demonstrating gravity. the measurments that are used are labeled Gforce, but thats just the measurement. it doesnt prove gravity. the experiment uses leadballs to control for magnetic causes but even leadballs are electrostatic like all objects.
Anonymous
No.172601
172603 172697
3354195-1.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172602
172603
CF56ABAB7266BEBF8CD61920F78A0178-344166.jpg
5B9BF077CC446A97D6EBAA729BD75353-1200467.png
009E2B45DB675869C4BCAE23EDBF774D-2558881.gif
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172603
172604 172605
>>172601
yes, 99% of people are dishonest with themselves. cope about it. that reality. also, youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs, no matter how much you cry about it. its not just me "calling it CGI". you demonstrated ZERO verifiable evidence of curvature, were still waiting on that. also, youre retarded if you think im going to read all 2000 replies in this thread just to keep track of which points have or havent been mentioned yet. can you also tell us how factoring electrostatics points to the existence of gravity in the experiment? looks like you skipped over that part, or youre expecting us to just know all the details or read your mind
>>172602
my senses tell me that the ground is stationary, and flat is a discription of surface. what we observe is flat. youre the one jumping through hoops and putting youre faith in institutions for evidence of curvature, not us. your claimed 3959 mile radius is a positive claim which requires burden of proof.
Anonymous
No.172604
172608
>>172603
>youre objectively using CGI images, not real photographs
Citation needed.
Anonymous
No.172605
172608
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172606
6941724.jpg
956293.png
2635639.png
>>148828
>>149174
>>156686
>>158063
>>158055
Just a refresher. There's more too.
Anonymous
No.172608
172609 172610 172737
2870013__explicit_rainbow+dash_fluttershy_female_pony_mare_nudity_pegasus_smiling_blushing_looking+at+you_open+mouth_butt_vulva_anus_duo_plot_vector_.png
GGEXunMXcAAcg1m.jpg
Screenshot_20231112-221852-262.png
5f0.jpg
balltardlogic.jpg
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172609
172673
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172610
172611 172673 172737
>>172608
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172611
2175998.jpeg
>>172610
>"Nuh uh nobody can ever prove any piece of evidence."
Classic.
For everybody I would recommend this video because it shows a pretty neat picture.
[YouTube] Flat Earth 'evidence' That SHOWS CURVATURE [Embed]
Anonymous
No.172613
1637138.gif
3170955.jpeg
Here you go. Did you scale matters?
[YouTube] The easiest observation to disprove Flat Earth? [Embed]

[YouTube] Flat Earthers underestimate how BIG Earth is [Embed]
Glim
!Glam8.itxo
No.172616
173301
3zagnp.jpg
            [Read more]            

Thread Watcher
TW