This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
Merry Christmas and Happy Hearth's Warming Everyone and Everypony!
[YouTube] The True Gift of GiftingIf you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg
(859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif
(6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2720 replies and 1415 files omitted.
File (): B8496A9CC715A9F681B0E70E89315BD9-79686.jpg
(77.8 KB, 1280x720, Rarity_thinking_S4E13.jpeg)
>>164831
People cross the pole of the time. The main reason why they don't do it often is because it's dangerous and not always necessary.
Also, international law is laughably impotent, especially when it comes to restricting access to areas. They can't even stop Japs from hunting whales to extinction.
The Arctic circle is expected to become contested between the US and Russia in the near future, since recent ice melts have eased travel and unearthed precious mineral deposits.
People cross the pole of the time. The main reason why they don't do it often is because it's dangerous and not always necessary.
Also, international law is laughably impotent, especially when it comes to restricting access to areas. They can't even stop Japs from hunting whales to extinction.
The Arctic circle is expected to become contested between the US and Russia in the near future, since recent ice melts have eased travel and unearthed precious mineral deposits.
>>164831
the Arctic is a lot more accessible than Antarctica, companies will even take you on a tour there for "request a quote" levels of money and the Russians have sailed a nuclear icebreaker all the way there and back
the Arctic is a lot more accessible than Antarctica, companies will even take you on a tour there for "request a quote" levels of money and the Russians have sailed a nuclear icebreaker all the way there and back
>>164826
>international community
It's really just absurd that people imply that the "international community", many of which are sworn enemies of eachother, could have or would have coordinated a massive intercontinental conspiracy to keep the shape of the earth flat, when they've fallen flat on enforcing virtually any other kind of international law.
We've had two world wars, and a cold war thereafter where countries were fighting tooth and nail for influence. Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
>inb4 Jews
Jews can't even get half of Muslims to stop hating them on a national level. They are not all powerful when it comes to international media influence, especially not in non-western countries.
>international community
It's really just absurd that people imply that the "international community", many of which are sworn enemies of eachother, could have or would have coordinated a massive intercontinental conspiracy to keep the shape of the earth flat, when they've fallen flat on enforcing virtually any other kind of international law.
We've had two world wars, and a cold war thereafter where countries were fighting tooth and nail for influence. Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
>inb4 Jews
Jews can't even get half of Muslims to stop hating them on a national level. They are not all powerful when it comes to international media influence, especially not in non-western countries.
>>164835
I brought something like this up earlier in the thread, some guy actively evading both sides in WWII sailed all the way around the world below the capes and OP in his infinite wisdom said he was a globalist masonic shill
see: Vito Dumas
I brought something like this up earlier in the thread, some guy actively evading both sides in WWII sailed all the way around the world below the capes and OP in his infinite wisdom said he was a globalist masonic shill
see: Vito Dumas
File (): 26F698E3E6DC3B6A3919869350EDC411-1502952.png
(1.4 MB, 859x1196, unknown_54_13.png)
>>164841
he's laying low until we all forget that he's got questions to answer, don't let him forget.
he's laying low until we all forget that he's got questions to answer, don't let him forget.
>>164835
Yeah, while I'm not saying that the earth is flat, I do want to point out that there's nothing absurd about conspiracies across the world.
The cold war was an illusion and if muslims were a threat they'd stop them from entering countries were they live but they don't. Jews aren't afraid of muslims.
>Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
Because they aren't nationalist, why would they care what happens to their country?
>>164844
Honestly, I wouldn't respond either. It's a waste of time speaking to people who clearly don't listen to you. The idea of wining debates to further one's ideology's position is a monkey on your back. There's no winning from there. On that note, he has been active in defending his position earlier in thread.
Regardless, winning a debate is not proof that one's position is the correct one.
Yeah, while I'm not saying that the earth is flat, I do want to point out that there's nothing absurd about conspiracies across the world.
The cold war was an illusion and if muslims were a threat they'd stop them from entering countries were they live but they don't. Jews aren't afraid of muslims.
>Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
Because they aren't nationalist, why would they care what happens to their country?
>>164844
Honestly, I wouldn't respond either. It's a waste of time speaking to people who clearly don't listen to you. The idea of wining debates to further one's ideology's position is a monkey on your back. There's no winning from there. On that note, he has been active in defending his position earlier in thread.
Regardless, winning a debate is not proof that one's position is the correct one.
>>164845
>people who clearly don't listen to yo
Like, you do in fact do not believe ijn this, right? I'm not trying to say you're too arrogant or anything but it's very clear that you strongly disbelieve.
>people who clearly don't listen to yo
Like, you do in fact do not believe ijn this, right? I'm not trying to say you're too arrogant or anything but it's very clear that you strongly disbelieve.
>>164845
>Jews aren't afraid of Muslims
>Muslims aren't a threat
these aren't mutually exclusive, my friend. They let them into your country because they're not a threat to Jews specifically, but they are a threat to you when they're in your country, like any ethnic minority that refuses to assimilate into your culture.
you know.... like Jews
>Jews aren't afraid of Muslims
>Muslims aren't a threat
these aren't mutually exclusive, my friend. They let them into your country because they're not a threat to Jews specifically, but they are a threat to you when they're in your country, like any ethnic minority that refuses to assimilate into your culture.
you know.... like Jews
>>164844
>it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.
OP come with facts, but all you have is character assassination and debunked NASA shills. If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
>it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.
OP come with facts, but all you have is character assassination and debunked NASA shills. If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
File (): 212E9A08C34AA0D497E006B7DB739368-402234.png
(392.8 KB, 600x575, 131942468137.png)
File (): EE1968821D0D6850BFC725B336CE9557-136378.png
(133.2 KB, 939x821, 51BC5EAC-01F9-4493-A6C0-5748A1812B51.png)
I don’t believe in Flat Earthers
File (): 0DF21723A232C85982A10802E5B97066-266926.jpg
(260.7 KB, 1500x1125, 87655994.jpg)
File (): 3936BA23C05F83E1F69661597609FA80-121371.jpg
(118.5 KB, 1080x1080, e1b6a7366b2ec8bd0c75be58354c0bdc.jpg)
>>164856
It literally has been. You just dismiss anybody who doesn't reaffirm your existing beliefs as a "NASA/Freemason shill".
I'm beginning to suspect that you wouldn't even accept direct empirical evidence seeing the earth from space.
Also, answer all the earlier questions/refutations, you conniving coward.
It literally has been. You just dismiss anybody who doesn't reaffirm your existing beliefs as a "NASA/Freemason shill".
I'm beginning to suspect that you wouldn't even accept direct empirical evidence seeing the earth from space.
Also, answer all the earlier questions/refutations, you conniving coward.
>>164859
"my eyes themselves are freemasonic, jesuit shills" - OP, seconds before blinding himself after his ride to space
"my eyes themselves are freemasonic, jesuit shills" - OP, seconds before blinding himself after his ride to space
>>164849
That's a map.
Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, and the proof of that was that he sent an expedition to the north pole to investigate the Hollow Earth theory.
That's a map.
Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, and the proof of that was that he sent an expedition to the north pole to investigate the Hollow Earth theory.
>>164857
This is simple. The craft was moving with the earth on its axis, just like anything else that moves straight upwards. It's geostationary.
On an unrelated note Baumgartner is a retard for thinking it was possible somehow to break the sound barrier by falling from great height. Terminal velocity is a thing.
This is simple. The craft was moving with the earth on its axis, just like anything else that moves straight upwards. It's geostationary.
On an unrelated note Baumgartner is a retard for thinking it was possible somehow to break the sound barrier by falling from great height. Terminal velocity is a thing.
>>164862
>he was a retard for thinking he could break the sound barrier by falling
he.... did though?
>reaching an estimated top speed of 1,357.64 km/h (843.6 mph), or Mach 1.25
>he was a retard for thinking he could break the sound barrier by falling
he.... did though?
>reaching an estimated top speed of 1,357.64 km/h (843.6 mph), or Mach 1.25
>>164852
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
Oh, come on, Anon. That's never stopped any /pol/ack or other imageboard user before.
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
Oh, come on, Anon. That's never stopped any /pol/ack or other imageboard user before.
>>164852
Are you saying there hasn't been a single debate in which the person who was wrong won?
It's a waste of time. In the end it's both for the sake of pride but also for political appeal to others. Both of these don't serve you. Pride gets in the way of intellectual development of ones ideas and influencing others is best done by playing on your homefield, as in books or something. Some sort of focused push than endlessly debating people on the internet.
Are you saying there hasn't been a single debate in which the person who was wrong won?
It's a waste of time. In the end it's both for the sake of pride but also for political appeal to others. Both of these don't serve you. Pride gets in the way of intellectual development of ones ideas and influencing others is best done by playing on your homefield, as in books or something. Some sort of focused push than endlessly debating people on the internet.
>>164865
look man I just like checking in here every few days and curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs, don't look any further into it. I'm here for my entertainment, if the rest of you get a chuckle out of it I win even more
look man I just like checking in here every few days and curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs, don't look any further into it. I'm here for my entertainment, if the rest of you get a chuckle out of it I win even more
>>164850
You repeatedly calling people "NASA shills" without substantial evidence is the definition of character assassination and ad hominem.
>If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
Said the pot to the kettle.
You repeatedly calling people "NASA shills" without substantial evidence is the definition of character assassination and ad hominem.
>If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
Said the pot to the kettle.
>>164865
>It's a waste of time.
This, tbh. It's not exactly the most productive or interesting use of energy.
>>164866
The beliefs really don't need to be curbstomped. You've already made your point to all 4-5 guys who even bother to read this thread, and OP certainly isn't changing his mind.
Couldn't you find something more substantial to argue about? That argument energy would be better invested making politics threads, or arguing about which mare is cutest.
>It's a waste of time.
This, tbh. It's not exactly the most productive or interesting use of energy.
>>164866
The beliefs really don't need to be curbstomped. You've already made your point to all 4-5 guys who even bother to read this thread, and OP certainly isn't changing his mind.
Couldn't you find something more substantial to argue about? That argument energy would be better invested making politics threads, or arguing about which mare is cutest.
Outstanding, the shilling is off the chart today.
>>164871
why does the land float on the ocean if gravity isn't real and density determines where things go on the planet? (both claims of your Mr. Dubay)
why does the land float on the ocean if gravity isn't real and density determines where things go on the planet? (both claims of your Mr. Dubay)
>>164872
by the way, my friend, you CAN experimentally prove this one yourself, go outside (hard, I know)
find a rock
drop it in water
by the way, my friend, you CAN experimentally prove this one yourself, go outside (hard, I know)
find a rock
drop it in water
>>164870
I didn't say that. I said you're just wasting your time in this particular thread. It would be better spent elsewhere.
I didn't say that. I said you're just wasting your time in this particular thread. It would be better spent elsewhere.
>>164874
I don't understand why people think it takes some massive time and effort to bang out 3 sentences or less dunking on a retard. I have a triple digit IQ, this isn't some massive use of my time. Most of the time I do it between work tasks or lift sets
I don't understand why people think it takes some massive time and effort to bang out 3 sentences or less dunking on a retard. I have a triple digit IQ, this isn't some massive use of my time. Most of the time I do it between work tasks or lift sets
File (): A478E9DF3DAC97EA4BC7DDED1310F86F-60293.jpg
(58.9 KB, 800x800, 6ee2291c20f79622afd8c3a53fcf3936.jpg)
Not sure who is trolling and baiting who.
>>163383
If we're gonna go on about assertions unresponded to, I'd like for OP to respond to NASAs assertion that its a pone
If we're gonna go on about assertions unresponded to, I'd like for OP to respond to NASAs assertion that its a pone
File (): 661AB9E0CDCE85F646D9710F1F52244B-59152.png
(57.8 KB, 500x503, hehehe.png)
[Reply]
[Last 50 Posts]
[Last 100 Posts]
[Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1950] [1951-2000] [2001-2050] [2051-2100] [2101-2150] [2151-2200] [2201-2250] [2251-2300] [2301-2350] [2351-2400] [2401-2450] [2451-2500] [2501-2550] [2551-2600] [2601-2650] [2651-2700] [2701-2750] [2751-2770] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
2770 replies |
1431 files |
277 UUIDs |
Page 5