/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2211 replies and 1108 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.165997
165998
>>165996
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
Anonymous
No.165998
>>165997
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
Anonymous
No.165999
166000
>>165996
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
Anonymous
No.166000
166001
>>165999
Just use a different focus then. It's not hard. The curve is visible.
Anonymous
No.166001
166003
File (hide): E3B5FDBDEB509D20579D0318DA084923-3896174.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:400x224 Length:00:03:37, 81beee.mp4) [play once] [loop]
81beee.mp4
>>166000
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.

Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
Anonymous
No.166002
405b.png

Anonymous
No.166003
166004
>>166001
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
Anonymous
No.166004
166005
what.png
>>166003
>the camera isn't turning at all
Anonymous
No.166005
166006
>>166004
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
Anonymous
No.166006
166007
>>166005
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
Anonymous
No.166007
166008
>>166006
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
Anonymous
No.166008
166009
>>166007
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
Anonymous
No.166009
166010
>>166008
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
Anonymous
No.166010
166011
>>166009
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
Anonymous
No.166011
166012 166014
>>166010
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
Anonymous
No.166012
166013
>>166011
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166013
166015
>>166012
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
Anonymous
No.166014
166016
>>166011
Search this thread for "laser", very interesting the results indeed.
Anonymous
No.166015
166018
>>166013
>Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve
Post them.
Anonymous
No.166016
166017
>>166014
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
Anonymous
No.166017
166018
>>166016
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
Anonymous
No.166018
166019 166020
>>166015
Jeran Campanella's experiment in his documentary where he did it trying to prove the earth was flat, but hit a bump when his laser showed the opposite of what he was trying to prove.
>>166017
Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Anonymous
No.166019
166021
>>166018
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
Anonymous
No.166020
166021
>>166018
>Jeran Campanella's experiment
Post it.
Anonymous
No.166021
166022
>>166020
It's in his 2018 documentary. I'm sure you've heard about it.
>>166019
So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
Anonymous
No.166022
166023
>>166021
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
Anonymous
No.166023
166024
>>166022
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
Anonymous
No.166024
166025
>>166023
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
Anonymous
No.166025
166026
>>166024
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
Anonymous
No.166026
166027
earth-curvature-scale.jpg
>>166025
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
Anonymous
No.166027
166028
>>166026
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
Anonymous
No.166028
166031
lafweawee.png
>>166027
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
Anonymous
No.166031
>>166028
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
Anonymous
No.166039
2312.png
>SHADOWS NEVER INTERSECT - (3:32 long)
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
Anonymous
No.166043
File (hide): 50767598B2A63BDCFA60B75252D06FCB-3722834.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:34, Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4
>Southern Stars Quick Take
Anonymous
No.166046
UdBKz0kw-92932349-461x1024.jpeg

Anonymous
No.166055
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).mp4
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).
Anonymous
No.166059
File (hide): 8FA1814624A5EE40E8DB4838275A2396-1328226.mp4 (1.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:42, THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4) [play once] [loop]
THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4
>THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Anonymous
No.166060
hqdefault.jpg
Scr0516.png
>The Earth Is Still Flat | Globebusters Response to Professor Dave - (3:15:07 long)
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
Anonymous
No.166075
166076
Watch till the end and then die in fire.
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
Anonymous
No.166076
166077
>>166075
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
Anonymous
No.166077
166079
>>166076
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.

You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
Anonymous
No.166079
166081
File (hide): 83A45415E59B88F652CC055761E4CFC6-5618883.mp4 (5.4 MB, Resolution:578x480 Length:00:02:48, Globeheads be like.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Globeheads be like.mp4
>>166077
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
Anonymous
No.166080
Centrifugal force

Bottom text
Anonymous
No.166081
166082
my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif
>>166079
>overwhelming evidence
Anonymous
No.166082
166083
ad95.png
>>166081
Yup, no curve then no globe.
Anonymous
No.166083
166084
546818__safe_screencap_applejack_simple+ways_animated_eyeroll_female_solo.gif
>>166082
Whatever you say, sugarcube.
Anonymous
No.166084
166085
4c9b.png
>>166083
Sorry but it is what it is, darling.
Anonymous
No.166085
dcbb7r0-6da512e9-63c9-466d-9823-12293f34e9c7.png
>>166084
Uh huh
Anonymous
No.166098
166109
1665862095321637.jpg