/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2161 replies and 1099 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.165779
>>165775
>debunked
Citation needed
Anonymous
No.165780
>>165775
Where was that debunked?
Anonymous
No.165781
165807
>>165778
Begging your pardon, but I just spent an hour trying to sift through this whole fucking thread, just to find the video, and I still havent, so no I cant give a more comprehensive answer tha. To refer3nce these stills, which are clearly at the sameleve of zoom.
>>164572
Anonymous
No.165790
165807
>>165778
Found it!
>>163405
So. In this video, we watch the slow and painstaking process of supertanker making a right turn while descending over the horizon. Yes, the videographer zooms out and back in on occasion, however the zoom out and in occurs very fast, and couldn't cause the viewer to think that the slow, gradual dissapearance over the horizon has anything to do with the zoom.
Unless you're a flat earth glownigger like OP, that is
Anonymous
No.165794
165795
>>165777
>If our Earth plane is covered by a crystalline translucent dome firmament"
It is very different to:
>>165774
>firmament is solid glass

Would you mind to take some English comprehension classes?
Anonymous
No.165795
165797
>>165794
The effect was produced by a solid prism.
Unless this is crystal magic where a crystal dome produces the same effect as a prism, you're full of shit and you know it, glownigger.
Anonymous
No.165796
>inb4 some mlp image from the crystal empire against sombra n shit
Anonymous
No.165797
165798
>>165795
>The effect was produced by a solid prism
Actually a solid semi-sphere, then Dubay introduces the gas ionization phenomena and the difference between sunlight and day light.
Don't be a faggot a stop lying.
Anonymous
No.165798
165800
>>165797
So for the record, are you staking the claim that ionized gas produces a prismic effect?
Yes, it's a hemisphere but its still prismic (as in, effect), by your insistence.
Anonymous
No.165800
165801
1pcs-Prism-Laser-Beam-Combine-Cube-Prism-for-405nm-450nm-Blue-Laser-Diode-5W-for-Optical.jpg
sneha-b-volume-of-triangular-prism-07-1606298603.png
>>165798
>prismic effect?
Anon, it is obvious that gasses don't meet the prism definition. You are confusing the term perhaps with light diffusion (Physics 101).
Anonymous
No.165801
>>165800
However you did insist on a transparent mysterious solid dome which does fall on as prismatic effect, not only that the speed of light through the various mediums should be calculatable as with the energy required.
Some fuckery is going on.
Not only that but everything that goes on everywhere has to be described in detail and all the stuff has to match up.
I mean this should be a trifle really, in a solid dome the fuck is space rocks that land.
Anonymous
No.165802
165803
dRBDrCrnHQrNyOwH32sl8Kpn.jpg
>Flat Earth - Meteors, Comets and Craters
>Meteors, meteorites, asteroids, comets, and shooting stars are not what you have been led to believe.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/FlatEarth-MeteorsCometsandCraters:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ZogXzFn5Vqw/
Anonymous
No.165803
165804
>>165802
>"Space junk don't exist dumbass."
- Eric "Sphereroids? More like hemorrhoids." Dubay
Anonymous
No.165804
4700.png
>>165803
There's another interesting theory about objects falling from the dome. Not substantiated but it gives food for thought.
>Meteors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3TVlW8PXkw
Anonymous
No.165807
165808
>>165781
>>165790
Thanks for your reply.
I was actually thinking of these videos, reposting them here for the ease of access.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX_eBzCdBTk&ab_channel=EricDubay
6:37
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow2MoLQXJsQ
3:14
What do you think about them? The timestamps are the ones that discuss ship's hulls going over the horizon first.
Anonymous
No.165808
165810
>>165807
But again, that's horseshit.
When we're talking about ladies walking, or cars driving, the relative area where the distortive visual effect is at MAX 2', which is acceptable given the threshold of the distortion.

In the video I provided, we're talking about watching AN ENTIRE SUPERTANKER, OVER 100' TALL, SLOWLY CROSS THE VISUAL THRESHOLD OF THE HORIZON.

We are not the same.
Anonymous
No.165809
R.jpg

Anonymous
No.165810
>>165808
To further clarify this point.
According to Eric Bidet, the proportion of the distorted object (ship) that is obscured is relative to the distance and pverall volume. Meaning, as something becomes more distant and miniscule, the more of it's body becomes obscured, at least if the earth was flat. Which it is not.
You can tell using the ship video, because the overwhelming width of the ship is quite prominent right up until the point that it disappears over the horizon.
Again to Bidet's assertion, the proportion of the vehicle that is distorted should be relative to the overall volume. Thats observably not the case. The entire height of the ship dsappears over the horizon WELL before the width does so. Unless they sailed into a sea of piranha solution, and that supertanker got dissolved from the base up, it is impossible for the flat earth model to account for the ship's disappearance, no matter HOW many straws of 'perspective' and 'zoom' one grasps at.
Simply put, when one comprehends physics, math, proportion, etc. - regardless of what their opinion of round/flat earth - that ONE video conclusively proves that the earth is not flat.
Which is also why OP won't touch that video with a 10 foot pole.
That he persists with this flat earth nonsense while knowing that his position is literally impossible - no matter how much rhetoric/pilpul he attempts - is the cause by which I assert he's a filthy glownigger, probably tasked with monitoring/obfuscating site activity (and most likely, just one of hundreds who have been sent to various chan-boards to keep an eye out for any Christchurch-esque activity).
Having said and having grasped his motivation, his position has long since been illustrated as arguing in bad faith, intellectually dishonest, as well as laughably unsupportable, excepting individuals one or more standard deviations of intellect below the average.
Anonymous
No.165811
File (hide): 5286C713B6E91776908B6DE325B3DAB6-8979758.mp4 (8.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:47, FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4) [play once] [loop]
FLAT EARTH MAP.mp4
>FLAT EARTH MOON MAP WITH AMAZING DETAILS
Neither the source or content can be proven. Take it with two grains of salt and healthy skepticism.
Anonymous
No.165812
>Im just gonna ignore the elephant in the room, the thread
Anonymous
No.165814
165815
I'm still right about flat eattherism.
Anonymous
No.165815
165818
>>165814
Yes, but you'll never get an admission from OP. It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
>inb4 hurr, it shows a flat earth
>inb4 your words not mine
Anonymous
No.165818
165819
feStEGTcxW.jpg
>>165815
>It's not literal narcissism, but the behavior pattern is the same; you're wrong and he's right, nevermind what the evidence shows
What a coincidence, because the same may apply to (you).
Anonymous
No.165819
165820
>>165818
>n... no u!
Factually and evidently incorrect.
My assessment of (you) is based on observation and your displayed behavior. I'm perfectly open to theories that have evidential merit, and I am on record with a 'whackjob' theory of my own. And yet, I manage to avoid patronizing anons, dismissing their positions without merit (I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless) and outright ignoring evidence I can't contest.

No no, again, that's just (you)
Anonymous
No.165820
165831 165832
2134215__safe_screencap_trixie_pony_unicorn_a+horse+shoe-dash-in_cropped_disbelief_faic_female_frown_mare_reaction+image_solo_trixie+is+not+amused_unamused.png
>>165819
>(I read/watch/reply-to all of your posts, regardless)
... Why? Why are you entertaining this retard with your attention?
You seem to have already understood that he can't be convinced, so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him? What are you trying to prove?
Anonymous
No.165830
File (hide): E9B10644C5078B588E86B263C2F39F60-12152650.mp4 (11.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:03, WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
WW2 and Flat Earth.mp4
Psalms+19 1+The+heavens+declare+the+glory+of+God;+and+the+firmament+sheweth+his+handywork..jpg
WW2 and Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.165831
165832
>>165820
>so why are you still arguing with him? Why not just ignore him?
Wise advise.
Anonymous
No.165832
165833 165834 165838
>>165820
>>165831
A. Because ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
B. Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
C. Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
... to name a few
Anonymous
No.165833
facehoof.png
>>165832
(you) cannot please everyponer.
Anonymous
No.165834
165835
c'mon.png
>>165832
>tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
>largesse
I'm impressed.
>faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
A bit over the top. Don't (you) think?
Anonymous
No.165835
165836
>>165834
>over the top
Not at all. If he was posing the question/ideas to have a discussion, discuss the merits admit/acknowledge the flaws, and engage in GOOD faith dialogue/exchange, then yes, that would be over the top. IF that's what he was doing.
Anonymous
No.165836
165837
>>165835
>IF that's what he was doing.
He said it in the OP, it is about to debunking the globe.
Anonymous
No.165837
>>165836
Reiterating, if he was doing so in good faith, there would be no contest.
Anonymous
No.165838
165839
>>165832
>ignorong him could be construed as tacit acceptance and/or user largesse
No it isn't. You can't go arguing with every retard on a chansite.
>Because more naïve and/or impressionable users might fall for his bullshit othwrise
That's none of your business; and no, they wouldn't.
>Because faggots like him should be made to feel unwelcome
Over the past year+ of arguing, you have not succeeded in making him leave. This isn't worth your attention.
Anonymous
No.165839
165840
>>165838
>tries to conflate Mlpol with all other chansites, including 4chan
Get fucked, our demographics are way different than other chans, the circumstances are entirely different and so the strategy must also be proprietary. Additionally, I don't argue with every asshole on the site because A. Most assholes dont persist for literal years with a conclusively fallacious premise and B. Because for some reason, people tend to leave the flatty alone.
>none of your business
Get fucked, this site IS my business. Its called TAKING responsibility. If (you) knew the first thing about it, we wouldnt be having this cpnversation/issue.
>he hasnt left, not worth your attention
Oh, so now you're concerned with how I value my time? Get fucked thrice. The intent is not to make him leave, (tho it would be nice) the intent is to cement in his and other eager flatties looking for a beachhead of sorts that these ideas and the pilpul methods of asserting then will NOT go unopposed, and will be readily destroyed at leisure, often casually.
Anonymous
No.165840
165842
>>165839
Okay, fine. Argue with him all you want, but for the love of god, sage your posts so the rest of us don't have to see this thread at the top of the overboard/catalog every day.
Anonymous
No.165842
165843
>>165840
>Im the reason its on the overboard
Glad you mentioned it.
Why are /vx/ threads on perma-bump? Is it cuz the /vx/ threads are of such quality that exceeds even mainboard threads? Or is there something else to it?
Anonymous
No.165843
165845
>>165842
Sounds like an interesting discussion for /qa/. No idea why the /vx/ catalog is like this.

In the meantime, remember to sage. You're not the only one who argues with OP. I do it too on occasion, but I sage the thread so as to not give it extra attention. Just because OP bumps it doesn't mean you have to.
Anonymous
No.165845
165846
>>165843
>sage
Respectfully declined
>I dont know why
I do, and were it not for this thread it wouldnt be an issue. Unfortunately, this thread enjoys the fruits of the otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/, which stymies the natural user rejection of such threads as these, if it was to either hit bump limit and be remade or be bumplocked and still be remade.
>/qa/
Riiiiiiiiiight. I'll add it to my letter to Santa while I'm at it.
Anonymous
No.165846
165848
>>165845
>otherwise utility of the perma bump on /vx/
What utility?
Anonymous
No.165847
Flat eartherism is a jewish psyop
Anonymous
No.165848
165849
>>165846
Why, for the rp games, of course that is, the ones other than dick strangler's, who insists on posting to the mainboard cuz... reasons
Anonymous
No.165849
165851
>>165848
I don't think perma-bumping threads necessarily help games. Making new threads isn't that hard.
Anonymous
No.165851
>>165849
Well, when I was running a game, I insisted that my threads be immediately bump locked, but I had a hard on for AVOIDING the main page and then later, the overboard.
But current GMs,... ahem insist that it is too troublesome for players to check the thread(s), and further that lol the audience see when there's activity.
spoiler alert: it ain't gonna change
Anonymous
No.165852
165853 165855 165856 165877
Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it.
Anonymous
No.165853
165854
>>165852
Consider saging in the meantime if you don't want it to bump.
It's not hard.
Anonymous
No.165854
>>165853
Thats true, it isnt. But neither is the problem going to be properly addressed if I do so again, respectfully declined.
Anonymous
No.165855
165856 165861 165863
disgusting.png
>>165852
>Imo, bump locking this thread is the correct course of action, but staff is notorious for refusing my seggestions simply because it's me making it
One thing is your non-stop screeching because you would have to admit you were living a lie. But to sabotage a thread with bump-locking is totally a different league and shows how far, and low, you are willing to go to silence the opinions and facts you don't like.
Very commie of you.
Anonymous
No.165856
165861
rgeb39n8s.png
>>165855
>non-stop screeching
>to silence the opinions and facts you don't like
>Very commie of you.
I wonder if >>165852 is circumcised.
Anonymous
No.165861
>>165855
>>165856
Theres the intellectual honesty this thread is known for
Anonymous
No.165862
Who am I kidding, thats the intellectual honesty the site has been known for, these days.
Anonymous
No.165863
165864
>>165855
>sabotage
This right here. OP considers it sabotage to NOT be able to bump this shit in perpetuity
Anonymous
No.165864
165869
pinkie pie ---haters---.gif
>>165863
Imagine the haters if this thread crosses the 10,000 posts milestone.
Anonymous
No.165866
Nigger.
Anonymous
No.165869
>>165864
Imagine being so narcissistic to think that not always being on the overboard is censorship
Anonymous
No.165870
silly.jpg

Pupper
## Admin
No.165871
165892
Due to technical concerns brought up by users, bump limit on /vx/ has been lowered to 2,147,483,647. We apologize for any problems that the overly high bump limit has caused.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165874
165892
derpytech5.gif
I want to thank all of our concerned users for pointing out the critical flaw in our bump system that has been with us for years.
https://mlpol.net/vx/50370
https://mlpol.net/vx/51841
https://mlpol.net/vx/53728
https://mlpol.net/vx/55271
https://mlpol.net/vx/58626
https://mlpol.net/vx/60316

Look at those pathetic reply numbers that effectively organizes a campaign of such a scale. The need for a patch to the number of replies was long overdue. We have now solved this issue effective immediately.
Anonymous
No.165875
165876
Tbh, the bump limits on all of the boards are too high.
But the fact that /vx/ has no bump limit and no archive makes it stand out.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165876
165878
>>165875
There was a bump limit of a ridiculous 2000. Far too small to be of use as the examples on the board show. We have now patched this. To think we almost got to that number naturally if we didn't get alerted to the problem.
Anonymous
No.165877
>>165852
There is no reason to single this thread out among any of the others on /vx/.
I think bump limits should be fixed, but not in a way that targets any particular thread.
Anonymous
No.165878
165880
>>165876
What's the bump limit now?
Imo, it shouldn't be higher than 500, which is the highest it ever was back on 4chan (for faster boards like /a/ and /v/). I really don't think there's any reason for them to be higher than that.
Anonymous
No.165879
165880
Even a bump limit of 300 would be large, considering the speed of this board.
Fasces
## Mod
No.165880
165881
>>165878
>>165879
Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647. The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread. We have now fixed this short-sighted stance.
Anonymous
No.165881
165882
add.gif
>>165880
>The old bump limit was put in place for roleplay as multiple people each post for a turn which eats up the normal size of a thread.
I remember this. Imo, that was a mistake...
Imo, its why I care about this issue, because I feel like I contributed to the problem by selfishly requesting that the bump limits be increased for those RP threads back in the day, without consideration for the long-term damage it would do to the site. I've since realized that that was probably a bad idea.
>Bump limit now is 2,147,483,647.
Oh, I see this is a shitpost.
Shitposting aside, could we maybe talk about this in /qa/? There's already a thread up on the topic: >>>/qa/5974 → I don't want to shit-up this thread, even if some other Anons would rather discuss their meta grievances here for some reason...
Bump limits have been an issue I've been trying to raise awareness of for a while, and I think it's worth some more serious discussion.
Anonymous
No.165882
165884
>>165881
>probably a bad idea
You could have listened
Anonymous
No.165884
>>165882
I don't recall you making a big scene when the decision was made either. It's not like we don't have an entire board for meta issues.
Anonymous
No.165891
234r.jpg
>Eric Dubay
>Why isn't Polaris Visible from Australia?
>Globe Earthers are taught the reason that the North Pole Star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular Earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, they claim these boats and the Pole Star are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the Earth was truly a stationary plane that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris.
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/Why-isn't-Polaris-Visible-from-Australia-:d
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cULQxgB1pmK/
Anonymous
No.165892
>>165871
>>165874
Lmao, this feud with Samurais is getting old.
Anonymous
No.165894
165895 165974
b202f525cc93423f.png

Anonymous
No.165895
>>165894
To make it more accurate, make the CIA glownigger look like less of a chad and make the flat earther retard on a leash also babble about magic and psychic powers and History Channel-tier ancient alien nonsense to distract people from the jews in banks and government.
Anonymous
No.165941
File (hide): A472CB788F6E9748749B91A39ACDAEF4-2591708.mp4 (2.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:59, the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
the lie is CRACKING_EDIT.mp4
Cracking the ball lie.
Anonymous
No.165942
165943
>>165578
but the moon is demonstrably at least 20,000 kilometers away, big think
Anonymous
No.165943
>>165942
>demonstrably
How?
Anonymous
No.165952
File (hide): 093FACE42C03B13A524CF83E453D0745-12010054.mp4 (11.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:06:42, Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals.mp4
>Black Sun Model Explained - With Visuals
Just a theory.
Anonymous
No.165956
facebook_1663288789495_6976338822936040640.jpg

Anonymous
No.165957
165958
Hey, Pettan niggers.
If the earth is flat why does centrifugal force let slings work?
Anonymous
No.165958
165965
mocking.png
>>165957
Anonymous
No.165965
165968
>>165958
pettan means flat in asian
Anonymous
No.165968
haters gonna hate.gif
>>165965
Anonymous
No.165972
165973
File (hide): 18D0EB81F9E167F51ED805668BEBCFCB-2553600.mp4 (2.4 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:53, Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Truth in plain site on a Flat Earth.mp4

Anonymous
No.165973
>>165972
Now you're just being silly.
Anonymous
No.165974
165977
>>165894
It is wrong to assume that retards are glownigger plants just because they make a community look bad. Dealing with retards is, sadly, a consequence of being a haven of free speech.
That being said, I have no doubt that glowies plant bullshit on altchans and other free speech forums to discredit places like this.
Anonymous
No.165977
165978
map.jpg
>>165974
Glowniggers do indeed promote the controlled opposition "Flat Earth Society" website. Plenty of politicians and NASA propagandists mention it over and over again for character assassination purposes. That said, experiments don't find any curvature, so the whole ball shaped scam does go down in flames.
Anonymous
No.165978
165979
>>165977
>experiments don't find any curvature
You mean the experiments that you've accepted.
Anonymous
No.165979
165980
>>165978
Actually they are experiments that most people can reproduce, which is the very definition of science sticking to the Scientific Method.
Anonymous
No.165980
165982
>>165979
As opposed to the ones that showed the opposite and could still be reproduced?
Anonymous
No.165981
ball shaped earth - why lie.jpg
>Why Would They Lie About Flat Earth? - (6:37 long)
>When confronted with blatant NASA lies and obvious globe inconsistencies, the #1 most common frequently asked question is undoubtedly: but why would anyone lie about the shape of the Earth!? For what purpose would there be a multi-generational worldwide conspiracy to cover up the truth of our home? Why would NASA spend billions of dollars building rockets just to prank the population about outer space? What on Earth would be the point of hiding the flat Earth?
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/WhyWouldTheyLieAboutFlatEarth:3
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKOj2zORvKUo/
Anonymous
No.165982
165983
>>165980
>the ones that showed the opposite
Glad you brought it. The very definition of science is that it is not fixed or settled, never ever. Independent experiments unraveled the conspiracy wide open and the scam is undeniable.
Anonymous
No.165983
165985
>>165982
>it is not fixed or settled, never ever
>the scam is undeniable.
How can you say that it's not fixed or settled, and then immediately say that it's "undeniable"? Are you even listening to yourself?
Anonymous
No.165985
165986
>>165983
You are confusing physical phenomena with an agreement among conspirators to lie about the former.
Anonymous
No.165986
165989
>>165985
See, that's what I'm talking about. You just dimiss any experiments that disprove your worldview on the basis that they're conspiring against you. Anyone who comes up with a result that indicates curvature of the earth must be lying.
That's the purest form of ad homenim.
Anonymous
No.165989
165990 165991
>>165986
Not quite. Given that experiments paid and promoted by masons and their proxies are done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them, and therefore not suitable for replication, their claims are highly in doubt.
Think about it, people are not able to build an airship, like a zeppelin, and go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation.
Anonymous
No.165990
165992
>>165989
That's just attacking the character of the scientist, and not refuting the substance of the experiment themselves.
>done with equipment and circumstances only controlled by them
Have you considered just attacking a camera to a high altitude balloon and letting it fly up into the atmosphere? Even schools can do that; and they do so all the time. Try it yourself.
Or just putting sticks in the sand at different locations and measuring the shadows of their angles. Even the ancient Greeks could do that.
There are so, so, so many sources unaffiliated with NASA or masons or whatever you want to call them that can be independently verified. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you just dismiss all of them because they didn't come to the conclusion that you wanted them to.
Anonymous
No.165991
165993
>>165989
>go to Antarctica to explore without mason's soldiers threatening violence and confiscation
Japanese fishermen go to Antarctica to poach endangered whales all of the time. It's not that hard.
Anonymous
No.165992
165994
>>165990
Ahem.
If it cannot be replicated and then when taking a different approach to confirm the mason experiments you find out that it is all rubbish... Then what else you can say?
Anonymous
No.165993
165996
>>165991
Do they cross the 60th south parallel? I don't think so.
Anonymous
No.165994
165995
>>165992
>Then what else you can say?
Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake, and check to see if the researchers didn't account for variables.
Then you peer review the experiments and over time continue to reevaluate them until a contemporary understanding is reached.
>mason experiments
Or teenagers with a weather balloon.
Anonymous
No.165995
165996
>>165994
>Then you have to look at the substance of the experiments and analyze each step to see if there were mistake
This whole bread is about that, and the mounting evidence against the ball hoax is overwhelming.
Anonymous
No.165996
165997 165999
>>165995
I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>overwhelming
And at that point you're just exaggerating. It's easy to make odds look like that if you dismiss any opposing viewpoint as a shill.
Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
>>165993
Yes. Hungry Japs will go anywhere.