/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824 172841
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2671 replies and 1374 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.172673
172677 172678 172695 172696
>>172609
lmao this entire wall of text you made instead of admitting you cant verify your CGI photo and restating your argument. narcisissm involves selfishness, thats what it take to believe the cartoon globe. also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water? so yeah trip to ice wall isnt likely
>>172610
yes
Anonymous
No.172674
172676 172677
0cc7151eb8a8dfd6.jpg
Oof. The nerve of these globers.
Anonymous
No.172675
172676
031d4d8cba12ee70.jpeg
51acf8d1ae8ff6ae.jpeg
263d645bef5f882e.jpg
721adb949d1fc136.jpg
eda84089c5ec355d.png

Anonymous
No.172676
172677
>>172674
>>172675
I apologize for disturb (you) with memes but eloquence is not my strength.
Anonymous
No.172677
172678 172680 172737
>>172673
>>172674
>>172676
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172678
172679
>>172677
I'm OP and I just saw activity in this bread. The post >>172673 is not mine.
Anonymous
No.172679
172737
File (hide): B9DBDB510DB4AA12E11C1F3B87B6F69E-3834729.webm (3.7 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:53, 6506897.webm) [play once] [loop]
6506897.webm
>>172678
Don't care, image spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172680
172681
>>172677
>did you verify the meme yourself?
There are more than 2K posts above documenting the plane. What else is needed?
Anonymous
No.172681
172682 172737
File (hide): AE762B83A4278A851D4E1B706054781C-14340478.webm (13.7 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:18, 6950687.webm) [play once] [loop]
6950687.webm
>>172680
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172682
172683
>>172681
>CGI
According to the own words of a NASA employee, which was already posted in some post above, all pictures from space are CGI.
Anonymous
No.172683
172684
File (hide): BCA72E69AE3E183711D15038FA9C4A46-7801907.webm (7.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:22, 6923502.webm) [play once] [loop]
6923502.webm
>>172682
Your memes are too, spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172684
172685
6e55d9d0a08e2b7a.jpeg
>>172683
Chillax anon.
Anonymous
No.172685
172737
File (hide): 5EB066EBC647DC7787C802E7E2EAB9ED-3322069.webm (3.2 MB, Resolution:1440x1080 Length:00:01:26, 6848523.webm) [play once] [loop]
6848523.webm
>>172684
Spam for spam. A fair trade.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172687
172689
Screenshot_20240501_081951_Gallery.jpg
um anon, i think your computer is broken
Anonymous
No.172688
172694
043.jpg
>obviously appealing to your own authority
yes, faggot
Anonymous
No.172689
>>172687
Why do you post screenshots of things we can all clearly see?
He's repeating himself as a meme.
Anonymous
No.172694
>>172688
>Know Your Meme filename
Anonymous
No.172695
172719
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172696
>>172673
>also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
It's not a militarized border, and according to you it's a 49747.75 mile circumference. You think they have armed guards on every mile of it? People go there for illegal fishing/whaling all of the time. People go there for legal science/leisure all of the time. There's permanent settlement cabins there. You can go on vacation there too. Cruiselines pass by it. You can sign up for a trip to Antarctica today.
Anonymous
No.172697
>>172601
>You realize that "globetards" are ~99% of people, right?
Mmmmmm...
Anonymous
No.172698
172699
353546_galaxies-42159-3840x2160-jpg_3840x2160_h.jpg
cosmos164_01.jpg
m106.jpg
File (hide): D184D0C27DED5410DCB95D9808E6D34A-13922654.mp4 (13.3 MB, Resolution:1058x1096 Length:00:02:13, cf48048e4a184bdf.mp4) [play once] [loop]
cf48048e4a184bdf.mp4
>Star through telescope
How good it is that the normals can have technology and look for themselves.
The three first pics are what the freemasons say above is (pretty CGI to me) versus 4th video what we actually see.
Anonymous
No.172699
172700
>>172698
What is the 4th even from?
Anonymous
No.172700
172701
>>172699
The sky.
Anonymous
No.172701
172702
>>172700
Who took the video? What star is it aimed at?
Anonymous
No.172702
172703 172710 172716
>>172701
There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.
Anonymous
No.172703
172704 172737
>>172702
How am I supposed to verify this video if I can't even see where it comes from? Did you verify it? What relation does it have to the NASA stills you posted (which show three completely different pictures)? What am I looking at?
You are such a s hypocrite, it's unreal.
Anonymous
No.172704
172705
4852.png
>>172703
>Did you verify it?
How can anypony verify you are not a bot? Huh?
Even further, how you can be sure you are not some subroutine in the Matrix?
Anonymous
No.172705
172706 172707 172719
>>172704
It was you who brought up verification. You talked about others being unable to verify pictures of earth, and yet now you're posting videos that you yourself haven't verified.
You are a hypocrite.

Are you sure pic 2 even from NASA? I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.
Anonymous
No.172706
172709
>>172705
https://yandex.com/images/search?img_url=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-hel3-1.cdninstagram.com%2Fv%2Ft51.2885-15%2F275087950_3051916061740029_6129808300424805426_n.jpg%3Fstp%3Ddst-jpg_e35_s1080x1080%26_nc_ht%3Dscontent-hel3-1.cdninstagram.com%26_nc_cat%3D109%26_nc_ohc%3DhF3jo-jUhCgAX-vX7RJ%26edm%3DABfd0MgBAAAA%26ccb%3D7-4%26oh%3D00_AT-EHgG5LVPmr6woh7SDsACczBImF64pldV6MhYVWaau4w%26oe%3D6229AE67%26_nc_sid%3D7bff83&lr=202&p=1&pos=24&rpt=simage&text=star%20space%20nasa%20picture
Anonymous
No.172707
172708
>>172705
>I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.
Dude, why you don't get a proper and decent job instead of taking money from zog to oversee some austists?
Anonymous
No.172708
>>172707
>hurr durr ur a glowie
I have a job, nigger. And I got all of my work done early, so still have the spare time to call out your faggotry that's been polluting the board I use every day.
You posted three unrelated images, and then compared them to a video depicting an unrelated astrological sight that you can't even name. What were you trying to prove with that?
Anonymous
No.172709
172711
>>172706
I know how to use Yandex, you absolute troglodyte.
Anonymous
No.172710
172711
>>172702
>There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.
I'm talking about this video in particular. What is it from? Where did you get it? Who posted it?
Anonymous
No.172711
87456.jpg
>>172709
>>172710
Anonymous
No.172712
172713
2a3.png
>172711
>being this btfo over a lost argument
Anonymous
No.172713
172714 172717
>>172712
>lost argument
There is none. That cunt has a stuck neural path and insist on information she needs to fill her report. So her request is denied.
Anonymous
No.172714
>>172713
What report?
The argument is that your post didn't make any sense and doesn't prove anything because you're comparing completely unrelated images apples to oranges. You should at least be able to say what the video is from, if you expect anyone to learn anything from it.
Anonymous
No.172715
172718 172719
mundo.jpg
How could the earth be flat if it's hollow?
Why isn't this facebook simulator deleted yet?
Anonymous
No.172716
172737
File (hide): 26C497C9390DDD7CDD817E9654B007BD-12390813.webm (11.8 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:28, 6464828.webm) [play once] [loop]
6464828.webm
>>172702
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172717
172737
File (hide): 5366B034D17828994962E511D5EC6DF8-7657295.webm (7.3 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:19, 6654595.webm) [play once] [loop]
6654595.webm
>>172713
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172718
>>172715
Based Hollow Earth schizo. Far more interesting than flat earth.
Anonymous
No.172719
172720 172722
DDF4076D0212C08B98E4B3919FDF5995-81890.jpg
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172720
172721 172737
File (hide): 24AED54BDF366E567A345704DB9CEC8F-1721040.webm (1.6 MB, Resolution:720x720 Length:00:00:23, 6686134.webm) [play once] [loop]
6686134.webm
>>172719
>video evidence
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172721
172723
>>172720
i asked my question first, so are you gonna verify your obvious CGI cartoon or nah?
Anonymous
No.172722
172725
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172723
172724 172737
File (hide): E717AFBE4B83EEFA5F303744D511343E-13081098.webm (12.5 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:00, 6704674.webm) [play once] [loop]
6704674.webm
>>172721
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172724
>>172723
Remember to sage
Anonymous
No.172725
172726
>>172722
your definition of narcissism is one definiton, there are mutliple definitions for words. in saying that narcisissism equates to selfishness, there is nothing incorrect about that. its just you coping and being autistic

never did i say you CANT verify thats its CGI, just saying its not needed. your job is to verify the photo, not for flat earthers to un-verify it. everything else you just said is a total lie and full of semantics, starting to wonder if you have jewish DNA
Anonymous
No.172726
172727 172737
File (hide): D5A5A7F1A8C86843815DB2177B12DA9F-675931.webm (660.1 KB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:05, 6862762.webm) [play once] [loop]
6862762.webm
>>172725
>your job to verify
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172727
172728
>>172726
so you cant verify the curvature to exist yourself? thats all i needed to know. thanks for playing
Anonymous
No.172728
172729 172737
File (hide): 60406EE8CD89DB662430E000CDE6E587-51363475.webm (49.0 MB, Resolution:1238x720 Length:00:03:46, 6659405.webm) [play once] [loop]
6659405.webm
>>172727
>can't verify the plane to exist yourself?
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172729
172730
dLtSzUFN8o9unJa5rRKBL7.jpg
IMG_3591.png
>>172728
>verify
yes. you can verify it yourself like this. altitude baloon camera with different focal points and lense models
Anonymous
No.172730
172731 172737
File (hide): 5E39896608878CEB2C81CD0934FE2A62-2125102.mp4 (2.0 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:36, loadsamoney.mp4) [play once] [loop]
loadsamoney.mp4
>>172729
>more memes
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172731
172732 172734
>>172730
technically one of them is a diagram not a meme. but you want ignore the observation within the meme and just discard it as a meme
Anonymous
No.172732
172737
File (hide): 9D567F805D364060D4C79D7F7BF78121-1205792.mp4 (1.1 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:27, Its time.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Its time.mp4
>>172731
>disregarding things because I want to
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.172734
172736
>>172731
Why don't you reply to all of the arguments you've been ignoring? Like how you failed to explain how all of those antipodal flights take the same amount of time, no matter what direction the plane leaves from?
Diamond
!Tiara/Ut6s
No.172735
172740
2227184.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172736
>>172734
you might be replying to the wrong person, but i claimed that all international flights start off going northbound, never south or over antarctica. anyways, you still got more to explain here with your vague argument. what about flights times proves the globe?
Anonymous
No.172737
172738 172741
845.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172738
172739 172741
>>172737
i guess he is crying about memes because he cant replicate his CGI photo using his own tools and equipment. if someone can verify and replicate the cartoon to be real then ill stop being a flat earther today
Anonymous
No.172739
172741 172812
84659845.jpg
>>172738
>i guess he is crying about memes
I suspect this is the same bot crying fool about political memes as well. If you think about it, who are the beings complaining about memes? Who are the beings tracking down memes, memelords, and sources? Who are the beings screaming loud about "misinformation"? Yup, the jews and the SJW crowd. I believe we have a mole among us.
Anonymous
No.172740
172742
745.png
>>172735
>I'm totally writing a dissertation about, we really have to consider extra dimensions and their implications.
And the charlatan pops up.
Anon, theoretical math on a blackboard cannot replace the Scientific Method. If you cannot reproduce it in a lab, it is pseudo science.
Anonymous
No.172741
172743 172810
6496843.png
3177705.jpeg
6916756.gif
>>172737
It's a copy pasta you literal mental midget.
>>172739
>>172738
No, your content just sucks.
You said every piece of evidence had to be verified for CGI and verified or it doesn't count.
Lo' and behold you become salty when confronted by your own standards.
Like clockwork instead of owning up to anything, it's because the users of this site are bad.
Wow.
What a high IQ move.
Anonymous
No.172742
>>172740
A theory has some data to substantiate its possibility as factual.

The term you should be using is: hypothesis. Which is usually someone coming up with a pigshit eXpLaNaTiOn and looking for both the cause and solution at the same time. Basically Hegelian dialectic, in short.
Anonymous
No.172743
172744
main-simmon-lg.jpg
>>172741
>You said every piece of evidence had to be verified for CGI and verified or it doesn't count.
You are pretty dishonest. The CGI stuff has been confirmed by NASA's employee Robert Simmon, AKA Mr. Blue Marbleand.
Anonymous
No.172744
(13+) Racist Barn - A Parody Song of Raise This Barn from My Little Pony_ Friendship is Magic.mp4
>>172743
>a selfie
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Diamond
!Tiara/Ut6s
No.172808
172810 172821 172831
governemntal troling.png
3654765.PNG
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172810
172811
>>172741
incorrect. what i said is they have to be verified to be real, meaning you have to be able to reproduce the photo, and everyone must have the ability to do so. otherwise its unfalsifiable evidence aka not evidence.
>>172808
starting to wonder if you should seek help. your tangents are just misinformed complaints, this is the adult table here. our discussion is relevant to mainly the scientific method. can you tell us when and where you can see detectable curvature of our ground?
Anonymous
No.172811
172813
>>172810
>everyone must have the ability to do so.
Anyone who operates the telescope can do that.
>reproduce the photo
Which photo? If you mean multiple photographs of the same stellar body, they've done that.
>your tangents are just misinformed complaints
His complaints are relevant to the conversation and your inability to argue in good faith.
Anonymous
No.172812
>>172739
>who are the beings complaining about memes?
Complaining about memes is the modus operandum on chansites, you stupid newfag. Go look at any chansite on any board, and that 40-60% of what they do on any given day.
>Who are the beings tracking down memes, memelords, and sources?
Anons.
>misinformation
Nobody uses that term here.
>I believe we have a mole among us.
>implying everyone every other active user on the site is a mole
Anonymous
No.172813
172814 172815
>>172811
telescopes point at the sky, not the ground. try again
>which photo?
thats been my question the entire time. waiting for which photo is going to show the evidence for curve
Anonymous
No.172814
172816
>>172813
>telescopes point at the sky, not the ground. try again
Which photo are you referring to then? You posted several.
Anonymous
No.172815
172816
>>172813
>waiting for which photo is going to show the evidence for curve
How about a picture of the earth from space, run through the best digital forensics software to confirm no CGI artifacts?
Anonymous
No.172816
172817
>>172814
i already told you, im asking the same question about "which photo". i didnt post any curvature photos
>>172815
space has never been proven to exist, just another presumption you expect me to buy. and please go over every possible method that exists for finding CGI artifacts, that must take quite a while. but surely you have the patience. but because thats too silly and dumb to do, we can just cut to the chase and say unreplicable, call it a day. what can be asserted without backing can be dismissedd without backing
Anonymous
No.172817
172818
>>172816
>i didnt post any curvature photos
Then why did you bring up CGI, in the contest of posting images of galaxies and nebula, if it wasn't relevant to your point?
>please go over every possible method that exists for finding CGI artifacts, that must take quite a while. but surely you have the patience.
If I did that, would you accept the result?
>but because thats too silly and dumb to do
You asked for verification of the images. Is that not what you want?
>we can just cut to the chase and say unreplicable, call it a day
No. I could verify it. It would take me a few hours, but I could do that. Is that what you're asking me to do?
Anonymous
No.172818
172819 172820
>>172817
i meant CGIs of cartoon globe earth, not CGIs of space and galaxies. you dont see stars in the globe earth cartoon, just pitch black. which should really raise an eyebrow, but not for you for some reason, you find some excuse even though there are no excuses for it with modern photo/video technology.
>would you accept the results?
not the discussion worth having here, im more curious to know why you dont care to verify it through replication
Anonymous
No.172819
172823 172830
sample_af9c0aa5363f5a3fb8fbe6016ff49ebd.jpg
>>172818
>you dont see stars in the globe earth cartoon, just pitch black. which should really raise an eyebrow, but not for you for some reason
We already discussed this. Scroll up.
>not the discussion worth having here
A simple yes or no would suffice.
I'm asking you, because I want to know if it's worth it for me to do all of that work, or if you'll just ignore it, like you did after I did all of that math demonstrating that all of the antipodal flights between Jakarta and Bogota taking the same amount of time no matter what direction they leave from could not be possible on a flat earth and are in themselves evidence that the earth is round.
>im more curious to know why you dont care to verify it through replication
What, by flying to space? People do that all of the time, and they take photos of the experience every time. Of course, you dismiss them all as CGI (without even attempting to analyze them for it).
Anonymous
No.172820
>>172818
What moment in your life did you decide to become a retard?
Anonymous
No.172821
172822
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172822
172825
sample_5c08c93b48c61317ed1bfd2cce556beb.jpg
>>172821
>I told you if you paid attention, Shape of Earth isn't about absolute truth, it's about questioning what you have learned and believe as the reality they forced you to grow up with.
Are you implying it doesn't matter if it's true or not? We've been debating the truth all this time.

Also, lets revisit the topic of flights from Jakarta and Bogota. No CGI, no pictures, not expert testimony. Just independently verifiable flight arrivals/departures, paths, and math.
Anonymous
No.172823
172826 172828 172833 172837
>>172819
Why're you making such a big fuss defending your worldview? We're just trying to open your eyes to reality here and break through the bullshit you were taught. when you call us manipulated and indoctrinated, but maybe I've got better values than those telling you to buy into their version of things. Did you verify this? research that! I mean, come on now, can't you at least consider the other side and have a more neutral thinking cause there's plenty of counter evidence out there if you'd take a moment to look at them. but oh no, you're too smart for that, right? It ain't about who's right or wrong its about being willing to see beyond what they want you to see, give it a shot. I give you unlike the frenchie you don't wish to exterminate people who think differently.
Anonymous
No.172825
172827 172837
>>172822
first off why do learning the sahpe of earth really matters? I get how you try hard to bring proof of your opinion. It's not just about the shape of the Earth that really matters, it's the reality they've shoved down our throats I want to help you all questioning in this thread. now, when it comes to those flights from Jakarta to Bogota sure we can talk about paths but let's not forget something deeper here even if I don't know a lot of planes who really travels there. A counterargument like I said in Islam and other cultures they've got their own beliefs about the shape of the Earth. It's all about perspective, why do you stick with the specific one that was broguht up by freemasons, jews and jesuits? It's about breaking free from the constraints of what they want us to think. Who's to say their version of truth is the only one, you can bring any authority and scientists you want with proofs you want, it's about being string and not being influenced by anyone's narrative or worldview. I want you tlo keep questioning! who knows what we might uncover if we dare to step outside that box they've put us in. It's all about seeking truth, even if it's a bit unconventional. So, let's keep the conversation going and not attack anyone's status ok? We're on the same boat here, I am trying to help, others here are trying to make you think and not repeat what you learn or what you see.
Anonymous
No.172826
172834
sample_dbc7c99efc2b66bfb63c6073f5ae352d.jpg
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172827
172834
c0c79b72a987cc66b4c6873879d69212.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172828
>>172823
>maybe I've got better values than those telling you to buy into their version of things
You have not demonstrated those values this far.
>if you'd take a moment to look at them
What do you think we've been doing in this thread all this time?
Anonymous
No.172829
3219930.png
>gets asked to defend himself
>Switches gears to "it actually doesn't matter what's true"
Holy fuck, is this nigger serious?
Anonymous
No.172830
172831 172832 172834 172867
>>172819
you went to space? hooknose detected
Anonymous
No.172831
172834
sample_515b8b00e8d4cb203152ce35585b9794.jpg
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172832
172835 173069
sample_acd94624acbd2336d30a47c742cce4d0.jpg
>>172830
Respond to the point about the antipodal flights.
It starts around here >>169460 to >>169499
It seems as though a flattie came to the conclusion that the world was shaped like an orange in >>169491 , except, what are oranges shaped like? They're not flat disks; they're spheres.
Anonymous
No.172833
3355666-1.png
>>172823
>bumps thread with bait memes
>calls people who disagree with him shills
>ignores sound arguments and conveniently forgets previous points
>"Why're you making such a big fuss"
The audacity of this nigger.
Anonymous
No.172834
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172835
172838 172840
>>172832
>flatearth.ws infograph that strawmans the flat earth position using a model we dont claim
wow, not my first time seeing that
Anonymous
No.172836
172840 172841
Screenshot_20230814_234811_Chrome.jpg
>psyop: the website
waiting for them to walk me through on verifying curvature via repeatable experiment
Anonymous
No.172837
172860 172868
051BB61FBD5F224E4D35C5787B596EFD-522757.png
>>172823
>>172825
>It's just about opening your mind dude.
>Objective reality? No dude this is all about psychological stuff about questioning what might be true is it really true?
>What do you mean philosophy wouldn't be as retarded as all we're doing.
>Duuude this isn't about proving what we say is true, it's just yah know questioning shit.
>Cause how do you even know what is true duuude?
>Just change what you know because how could you even know bro? Just show a curve.
>No, no, no that doesn't count as a curve.
Oh my God. You're all just doing shitty philosophy and deliberately trying to murder how anybody tries to find anything out.
Anonymous
No.172838
172842 173253 173258
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172840
172843
3355545__explicit_artist-colon-dinoalpaka_bright+mac_pear+butter_earth+pony_pony_g4_blushing_clothes_commission_duo_duo+male+and+female_female_horsecock_jail_li.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172841
172844
>>172836
See >>148613
>This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
So do it. Debunk the psyop. Prove us wrong.
How is it that planes flying straight in four different directions from the same point can arrive at the same destination with similar travel times? How is that possible on a flat earth?
Anonymous
No.172842
172845
File (hide): 29379A626B8BB07D5C6CDF97897B9A25-2733427.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:640x366 Length:00:00:37, 29379A626B8BB07D5C6CDF97897B9A25-2733427.mp4) [play once] [loop]
29379A626B8BB07D5C6CDF97897B9A25-2733427.mp4
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
No.172843
172846 172848
>>172840
>ad hominem
you dont know what that means apparently
no planes have EVER done the bullshit like you claim. no such flight path exists of going around the full circumference of the ball. also, your flight paths argument relies on strawmanning a model, so idk why you repeated the same shit twice when i already told you the first time
Anonymous
No.172844
172846 172847 172848
>>172841
again, planes dont and never do this, there is no such flight route that goes around the entire circumference of a ball in a perfectly straight direction.