This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
2684 replies and 1356 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.172845
>>172842
Meant to post this video, but the point is the same.
Earth is a very special and beautiful place. It is unique among planets, a paradise.
Meant to post this video, but the point is the same.
Earth is a very special and beautiful place. It is unique among planets, a paradise.
>>172843
>no planes have EVER done the bullshit like you claim. no such flight path exists of going around the full circumference of the ball
They go halfway around, which is always the same distance. That's what an antipodal flight is.
Scroll up and see the list of flights: they all take the same amount of time, no matter what direction they leave from. How is this possible on a flat earth?
>look how they're trying hard
Elaborate. The map should be simple.
>when i already told you the first time
You never actually answered how it's possible.
>>172844
That's not what I said. They only go halfway around the earth. You'd know this if you bothered to research it before replying.
And regardless, how is it possible for flights to leave in four different directions and arrive at the same location in the same amount of time, unless the world is round? On a flat earth, they would take wildly different amounts of time. We even calculated the amount of time it would take earlier in the thread.
>no planes have EVER done the bullshit like you claim. no such flight path exists of going around the full circumference of the ball
They go halfway around, which is always the same distance. That's what an antipodal flight is.
Scroll up and see the list of flights: they all take the same amount of time, no matter what direction they leave from. How is this possible on a flat earth?
>look how they're trying hard
Elaborate. The map should be simple.
>when i already told you the first time
You never actually answered how it's possible.
>>172844
That's not what I said. They only go halfway around the earth. You'd know this if you bothered to research it before replying.
And regardless, how is it possible for flights to leave in four different directions and arrive at the same location in the same amount of time, unless the world is round? On a flat earth, they would take wildly different amounts of time. We even calculated the amount of time it would take earlier in the thread.
Anonymous
No.172847
>>172844
There is no flight route that goes around the circumference of the earth, because nobody has any reason to spend a ton of fuel to arrive at the same location they left from.
Antipodal flights go halfway around the world, and they can leave from any direction and arrive at the same location in similar amounts of time.
There is no flight route that goes around the circumference of the earth, because nobody has any reason to spend a ton of fuel to arrive at the same location they left from.
Antipodal flights go halfway around the world, and they can leave from any direction and arrive at the same location in similar amounts of time.
>>172846
>they take the same amount of time
this doesnt support your case argument in anyway. you can find many large flight routes that have similar flight times, and no, they arent exactly the same times, and even if you can find 2 of the same flight path times that work on a globe model it STILL doesnt support your case. there cant be such thing as anti podal flights, because theres no south pole. theyre just large different flight paths that happen to have relatively similar times
>they take the same amount of time
this doesnt support your case argument in anyway. you can find many large flight routes that have similar flight times, and no, they arent exactly the same times, and even if you can find 2 of the same flight path times that work on a globe model it STILL doesnt support your case. there cant be such thing as anti podal flights, because theres no south pole. theyre just large different flight paths that happen to have relatively similar times
>>172848
antipodal flights dont exist retard, because south pole and curvature doesnt exist. take your meds
antipodal flights dont exist retard, because south pole and curvature doesnt exist. take your meds
Anonymous
No.172851
>>172849
>you can find many large flight routes that have similar flight times
Yes. Most of those are antipodal flights, because they're all half the circumference of the earth.
Regardless, on a disk earth, those four flights should take wildly different amounts of time, as demonstrated in >>169477
If you can map those routes on a flat, circular map and have them be similar lengths, go ahead and show us.
>they arent exactly the same times
See >>169495
They are similar times, averaging about ~26 hours, despite leaving from completely different directions. How is this possible on a flat earth?
>there cant be such thing as anti podal flights
On a flat earth.
Nevertheless, the four flights from those two locations take the same amount of time no matter what direction they leave from. How are they doing that?
>it STILL doesnt support your case
It does, because four planes flying off in completely different directions and arriving within an hour of eachother isn't feasible on a flat earth.
>theyre just large different flight paths that happen to have relatively similar times
They are flight paths from and two the same location. On a flat earth, they should vary wildly
Go ahead and try to draw the lines with crayola crayons, and see how you can't make four planes leave in different directions and arrive at the same point by flying the same distance.
>you can find many large flight routes that have similar flight times
Yes. Most of those are antipodal flights, because they're all half the circumference of the earth.
Regardless, on a disk earth, those four flights should take wildly different amounts of time, as demonstrated in >>169477
If you can map those routes on a flat, circular map and have them be similar lengths, go ahead and show us.
>they arent exactly the same times
See >>169495
They are similar times, averaging about ~26 hours, despite leaving from completely different directions. How is this possible on a flat earth?
>there cant be such thing as anti podal flights
On a flat earth.
Nevertheless, the four flights from those two locations take the same amount of time no matter what direction they leave from. How are they doing that?
>it STILL doesnt support your case
It does, because four planes flying off in completely different directions and arriving within an hour of eachother isn't feasible on a flat earth.
>theyre just large different flight paths that happen to have relatively similar times
They are flight paths from and two the same location. On a flat earth, they should vary wildly
Go ahead and try to draw the lines with crayola crayons, and see how you can't make four planes leave in different directions and arrive at the same point by flying the same distance.
>>172850
I don't care what you call them. Fact of the matter is that you can fly in four different directions from Jakarta and arrive in Bogota in the same amount of time every flight, because it's the same distance. They can't be done on a flat earth.
I don't care what you call them. Fact of the matter is that you can fly in four different directions from Jakarta and arrive in Bogota in the same amount of time every flight, because it's the same distance. They can't be done on a flat earth.
>>172850
>take your meds
>implying
Lmao, the flat earther calling 99% of people schizos for disagreeing with him. That's rich.
>take your meds
>implying
Lmao, the flat earther calling 99% of people schizos for disagreeing with him. That's rich.
>>172849
>that happen to have relatively similar times
How is that possible on a flat earth? The the southernmost flight should be over three times as long as the northernmost, if the world were flat.
>that happen to have relatively similar times
How is that possible on a flat earth? The the southernmost flight should be over three times as long as the northernmost, if the world were flat.
>>172850
The flight themselves, which are very real and can be independently verified by the thousands of people who take them every year, are evidence of the earth being round. The flight that passed over Sydney would be 2-3 times as long on flat earth, but it's a negligible difference irl.
If they're not, map then out and show how they could possibly be the same distance on a flat earth. Draw the lines to show us all and prove it.
The flight themselves, which are very real and can be independently verified by the thousands of people who take them every year, are evidence of the earth being round. The flight that passed over Sydney would be 2-3 times as long on flat earth, but it's a negligible difference irl.
If they're not, map then out and show how they could possibly be the same distance on a flat earth. Draw the lines to show us all and prove it.
>>172852
This is basic geometry, there is no antipodal flight.
Let's have another approach to this problem, since you have to push your science I will push mine.
You don't contradict science fact. there's facts, go outside, look at what you see, look at the distance.
There are mountains there should not be visible on round Earth that are visible. There are cities visible from miles away that should not be visible, all of the things you see in distance are hidden with atmosphere's thickness.
I'm explaining facts, I expect you to listen or leave this thread. Go back to SP, or whatever place more suitable for you, if you're here you're coming to seek truth.
Other people provided enough evidence in the thread, instead of being stubborn please learn, read, study and think like an adult.
Flat Earth should just be called "world" to begin with, there is a LOT of things WE need to reveal to you but it requires an intellect ready to accept the cold truth. That you live in a lie and need to quit believing in it.
>>172853
Take meds. Not the Rx crap they give you for depression and for making you like they want you to be, I have been there, we have been there, refuse their meds. There's meds that will help you opening your mind. shrooms, weed, ask any open minded person and try not to call the cops. You need help, we need to help.
This is basic geometry, there is no antipodal flight.
Let's have another approach to this problem, since you have to push your science I will push mine.
You don't contradict science fact. there's facts, go outside, look at what you see, look at the distance.
There are mountains there should not be visible on round Earth that are visible. There are cities visible from miles away that should not be visible, all of the things you see in distance are hidden with atmosphere's thickness.
I'm explaining facts, I expect you to listen or leave this thread. Go back to SP, or whatever place more suitable for you, if you're here you're coming to seek truth.
Other people provided enough evidence in the thread, instead of being stubborn please learn, read, study and think like an adult.
Flat Earth should just be called "world" to begin with, there is a LOT of things WE need to reveal to you but it requires an intellect ready to accept the cold truth. That you live in a lie and need to quit believing in it.
>>172853
Take meds. Not the Rx crap they give you for depression and for making you like they want you to be, I have been there, we have been there, refuse their meds. There's meds that will help you opening your mind. shrooms, weed, ask any open minded person and try not to call the cops. You need help, we need to help.
>>172855
Pardon, the pic didn't show the flight over Sydney.
How is it possible that this flight takes ~27 hours, like the rest of them?
>>172856
I don't care if you call them antipodal or not. How can you have four different direction flights from Jakarta to Bogota take the same amount of time on a flat earth?
>Subject changing
Stop avoiding the question. These flights are real. How do they work on flat earth?
Pardon, the pic didn't show the flight over Sydney.
How is it possible that this flight takes ~27 hours, like the rest of them?
>>172856
I don't care if you call them antipodal or not. How can you have four different direction flights from Jakarta to Bogota take the same amount of time on a flat earth?
>Subject changing
Stop avoiding the question. These flights are real. How do they work on flat earth?
Anonymous
No.172858
Anonymous
No.172859
>>172856
>There are mountains there should not be visible on round Earth that are visible. There are cities visible from miles away that should not be visible, all of the things you see in distance are hidden with atmosphere's thickness.
Which mountains and cities, and from what focal point? You're going to have to be more specific. Horizon distance matters, as does elevation.
>I'm explaining facts
Then explain the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
>I expect you to listen
I am listening. I await a response to my various unanswered questions. Start with the flights.
>leave this thread
Lol, this is coming from the faggot who's shit on nearly every political thread I've made for the past 3 years.
>Other people provided enough evidence in the thread
And I've been engaging and refuting the arguments the whole time.
>instead of being stubborn please learn, read, study and think like an adult.
I could say the same for you.
>but it requires an intellect ready to accept the cold truth. That you live in a lie and need to quit believing in it.
Ditto.
>there is a LOT of things WE need to reveal
Reveal how the Jakarta-Bogota flight that passes over Sydney arrives within an hour of the other three flights, despite going in a completely different direction. Enlighten me.
>There are mountains there should not be visible on round Earth that are visible. There are cities visible from miles away that should not be visible, all of the things you see in distance are hidden with atmosphere's thickness.
Which mountains and cities, and from what focal point? You're going to have to be more specific. Horizon distance matters, as does elevation.
>I'm explaining facts
Then explain the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
>I expect you to listen
I am listening. I await a response to my various unanswered questions. Start with the flights.
>leave this thread
Lol, this is coming from the faggot who's shit on nearly every political thread I've made for the past 3 years.
>Other people provided enough evidence in the thread
And I've been engaging and refuting the arguments the whole time.
>instead of being stubborn please learn, read, study and think like an adult.
I could say the same for you.
>but it requires an intellect ready to accept the cold truth. That you live in a lie and need to quit believing in it.
Ditto.
>there is a LOT of things WE need to reveal
Reveal how the Jakarta-Bogota flight that passes over Sydney arrives within an hour of the other three flights, despite going in a completely different direction. Enlighten me.
Anonymous
No.172860
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGjcTypR1GI
Pilot says it's flat.
Atmosphere is the limit, space is fake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPBVGXdsR0I
"space" technology when it hits earth reveals being balloons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjP3wV7bEoM
>>172857
Pilots lies to you, you need a military training to pilot a jet plane. All airliners are freemasons.
>>170713
It is impossible for boats being visible in this distance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8DQSM-b2cc
Scientist says it's not impossible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs
He makes good points, I like his videos, and there's a message they want to pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0gd3Qc6S5Y
No, it's not about the bible, I'm not religious, only a few are and gets all things mixed up, round earth, space, and science are religion, if we are atheist we trust what we see as reality and not bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfZ2HZH5CkA
"greek with a stick" it hasn't changed since, we have powerfull cameras, lasers and more things to debunk curvature but they retort you can prove earth is curved with poles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he-7vs0BkLE
All they can do as arguments are humiliating and ad hominem attacks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lBpuBqxDVA
No it's not just a white guy's thing, there's more and more people across the world who knows and always knew.
Pilot says it's flat.
Atmosphere is the limit, space is fake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPBVGXdsR0I
"space" technology when it hits earth reveals being balloons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjP3wV7bEoM
>>172857
Pilots lies to you, you need a military training to pilot a jet plane. All airliners are freemasons.
>>170713
It is impossible for boats being visible in this distance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8DQSM-b2cc
Scientist says it's not impossible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqNnUJVcVs
He makes good points, I like his videos, and there's a message they want to pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0gd3Qc6S5Y
No, it's not about the bible, I'm not religious, only a few are and gets all things mixed up, round earth, space, and science are religion, if we are atheist we trust what we see as reality and not bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfZ2HZH5CkA
"greek with a stick" it hasn't changed since, we have powerfull cameras, lasers and more things to debunk curvature but they retort you can prove earth is curved with poles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he-7vs0BkLE
All they can do as arguments are humiliating and ad hominem attacks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lBpuBqxDVA
No it's not just a white guy's thing, there's more and more people across the world who knows and always knew.
Anonymous
No.172862
>>172856
Why do you keep avoiding the questions? You're taking us for fools, thinking we don't notice how you dodge the questions.
You don't deny the existence of a flight from Jakarta to Bogota that passes over Sunday, do you? There's ways to verify that.
There's another flight that passes over Istanbul: it leaves in a completely different direction, almost opposite direction, and yet it still arrives at the same destination in the same time.
How is that possible on a flat earth? Without curvature of the world, it should be possible to fly in two different directions and arrive at the same destination at the same time.
Why do you keep avoiding the questions? You're taking us for fools, thinking we don't notice how you dodge the questions.
You don't deny the existence of a flight from Jakarta to Bogota that passes over Sunday, do you? There's ways to verify that.
There's another flight that passes over Istanbul: it leaves in a completely different direction, almost opposite direction, and yet it still arrives at the same destination in the same time.
How is that possible on a flat earth? Without curvature of the world, it should be possible to fly in two different directions and arrive at the same destination at the same time.
>>172861
>All airliners are freemasons
Bold claim.
You can still independently verify when the planes land. The airlines can't triple the speed of a commercial airliner beyond its maximum velocity, or send it to a completely different location.
>Pilots lies to you
It doesn't matter what the pilots say. The time and place the planes arrive at is confirmed in real time. The thousands of people who take the flights can't all be paid actors.
>It is impossible for boats being visible in this distance
We already addressed this.
>Scientist
>Pilot
Appeals to authority, which is rich coming from you.
These are both individual anecdotes who happen to contradict thousands of others. They offer no good evidence.
>if we are atheist we trust what we see as reality and not bullshit
That's nothing more than John Locke style empiricism. Air, radio waves, etc, there are things in this world that you can't see.
The curve isn't visible from the surface of the earth because the earth is so immensely large. The earth is larger than you can imagine.
>ad hominem attacks
That's rich coming from the faggot who said "all airliners are masons" to avoid having to respond to the antipodal flights argument.
Still waiting for you to explain how those flights being the same distance is possible.
>No it's not just a white guy's thing, there's more and more people across the world who knows
So because niggers think the world is flat, it must be true? How niggerbrained of you.
>All airliners are freemasons
Bold claim.
You can still independently verify when the planes land. The airlines can't triple the speed of a commercial airliner beyond its maximum velocity, or send it to a completely different location.
>Pilots lies to you
It doesn't matter what the pilots say. The time and place the planes arrive at is confirmed in real time. The thousands of people who take the flights can't all be paid actors.
>It is impossible for boats being visible in this distance
We already addressed this.
>Scientist
>Pilot
Appeals to authority, which is rich coming from you.
These are both individual anecdotes who happen to contradict thousands of others. They offer no good evidence.
>if we are atheist we trust what we see as reality and not bullshit
That's nothing more than John Locke style empiricism. Air, radio waves, etc, there are things in this world that you can't see.
The curve isn't visible from the surface of the earth because the earth is so immensely large. The earth is larger than you can imagine.
>ad hominem attacks
That's rich coming from the faggot who said "all airliners are masons" to avoid having to respond to the antipodal flights argument.
Still waiting for you to explain how those flights being the same distance is possible.
>No it's not just a white guy's thing, there's more and more people across the world who knows
So because niggers think the world is flat, it must be true? How niggerbrained of you.
1714686305_1.jpg (167.4 KB, 520x793, oh fuck not again please nnooooooo.jpg)
1714686305_3.jpg (643.9 KB, 1040x1558, NOAA19_02-05-2024_20.16.38_rad.jpg)
1714686305_4.jpg (478.8 KB, 1375x1134, NOAA19_02-05-2024_20.16.38.jpg)
>>172837
The guy literally admits he's on drug, expect some poor, uneducated bloke, who identifies as white without being one.
Now have some more decent shots of >(You) freshly taken from space, twice the alti of the ISS (850Km) and really the camera is decent and can be art photo.
The guy literally admits he's on drug, expect some poor, uneducated bloke, who identifies as white without being one.
Now have some more decent shots of >(You) freshly taken from space, twice the alti of the ISS (850Km) and really the camera is decent and can be art photo.
>>172854
some airline tickets give times that dont include layovers. please explain whats wrong with flight paths being southernmost or northernmost departure or landing, youre making zero sense
>>172855
here this goes a 3rd time, WHO THE FUCK CLAIMS THIS MODEL? because no one here ever claimed that model in your infograph. your ENTIRE ARGUMENT with posting this pic falls flat on its face for that reason
>>172868
can you replicate this photo for us? weve been asking this forever now but you keep ignoring it
some airline tickets give times that dont include layovers. please explain whats wrong with flight paths being southernmost or northernmost departure or landing, youre making zero sense
>>172855
here this goes a 3rd time, WHO THE FUCK CLAIMS THIS MODEL? because no one here ever claimed that model in your infograph. your ENTIRE ARGUMENT with posting this pic falls flat on its face for that reason
>>172868
can you replicate this photo for us? weve been asking this forever now but you keep ignoring it
>>172870
point your antenna and set your receiver at 137.9125 MHz. yes it's VHF it's shit but don't requires a dish.
https://www.dk3wn.info/wp/wetter/die-wettersatelliten/noaa-18/
where are they now? look!
https://www.n2yo.com/?s=28654
voilà, you're now using one more space thing.
point your antenna and set your receiver at 137.9125 MHz. yes it's VHF it's shit but don't requires a dish.
https://www.dk3wn.info/wp/wetter/die-wettersatelliten/noaa-18/
where are they now? look!
https://www.n2yo.com/?s=28654
voilà, you're now using one more space thing.
1714691620.mp4 (21.3 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:04:10, BGM - Highest Level Unicorn.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>172870
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172875
>did you verify the meme yourself?
I'm thinking if I should make a thread in /ga/ about this nigger.
>did you verify the meme yourself?
I'm thinking if I should make a thread in /ga/ about this nigger.
Anonymous
No.172987
1714708692.mp4 (1.9 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:07, sorry are you sitting here [Antithology 2023].mp4) [play once] [loop]
![sorry are you sitting here [Antithology 2023].mp4](/images/thumb/656AC74B997BCEB89F4F18F05BEA84EA-2034438.png)
>>172917
>proof
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172941
>too afraid of the poster turning your own words against you
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>proof
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>172941
>too afraid of the poster turning your own words against you
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
1714714410.webm (4.5 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:04:15, 83905BB4D41144D0AE4B1CB00059F382-4679187.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172917
>you're asking me to explain how multiple planes go zoom.
>it just can't be done.
>it's impossible.
>what do you mean explain how planes get from point A to point B in similar amounts of time and distance?
>planes are just a m o d e l, it's against my beliefs to say planes are real.
Fucking incredible.
It's just about how the fuck planes get from point A to point B is the just about the same time and distance.
Put forth something that works.
>but things are work just don't exist
>you just have to have an e x p e r i e n c e dude.
>you have to radically isolate yourself, but i get to like not do that
>"no i cannot replicate the photo myself, im putting blind faith institutions"
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>you're asking me to explain how multiple planes go zoom.
>it just can't be done.
>it's impossible.
>what do you mean explain how planes get from point A to point B in similar amounts of time and distance?
>planes are just a m o d e l, it's against my beliefs to say planes are real.
Fucking incredible.
It's just about how the fuck planes get from point A to point B is the just about the same time and distance.
Put forth something that works.
>but things are work just don't exist
>you just have to have an e x p e r i e n c e dude.
>you have to radically isolate yourself, but i get to like not do that
>"no i cannot replicate the photo myself, im putting blind faith institutions"
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
1714714797.webm (30.9 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:11:16, AFAB9816FA30F18307BFA7AF1228BD6C-32429554.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>172941
>Too shocked that enough is enough means something.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>Too shocked that enough is enough means something.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
This is the guy they sent in to debunk and do the propaganda job posting obvious CGI and call it a victory.
>>172917
What always baffles me is the determination and energy they spend in forever replies, I've discussed flat earth with all kind of people, many other places so far resulting in rather constructive polite and educated commentaries thanks to some having arguments in good faith and open mindedness, accepting different views but this place sounds different like they're organizing to be stubborn and deciding what answers should be posted, what direction, who should intervene and shout their ha, got em! Some people took that facts and logic so hard with nothing holding them back or limiting them to the point of having pride instead. And that’s one of the seven deadly sins. For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
>>172917
What always baffles me is the determination and energy they spend in forever replies, I've discussed flat earth with all kind of people, many other places so far resulting in rather constructive polite and educated commentaries thanks to some having arguments in good faith and open mindedness, accepting different views but this place sounds different like they're organizing to be stubborn and deciding what answers should be posted, what direction, who should intervene and shout their ha, got em! Some people took that facts and logic so hard with nothing holding them back or limiting them to the point of having pride instead. And that’s one of the seven deadly sins. For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
>>172863
>The thousands of people who take the flights can't all be paid actors.
You're only scratching the surface awaiting to find out how much effort the propaganda machine is pushing for supporting their narrative and fiction. There's planes flying circles over the ocean to pretend people travel for hours across the globe. Why do airports have security so high they scan you, file you and make sure to check your background when traveling? Why do planes have windows so small so we can't see if it's curved or not?
No one can NOT "cross the Antarctica".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtMc5-hmZhA
Moon reflects earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJTPZf-3bN0
Many official science-oriented channels gives you hints
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klpDHn8viX8
And they try to pass a message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzC92VJJnvg
Muslims tries to redpill us on the consensus and they're the "bad guys"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbyytwO4U9Q
The elite knows and tries to give you a hint right there in plain sight, Noble prizes tells you the big lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txlCvCSefYQ
Horizon is infinite, all objects in the distance fades into blue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaeNEyLrgDM
Hollywood debunking space itself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjQx9wI4y9w
Again, no, Flat Earth isn't a religion and not linked to any.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=289cGJ7hOkM
Orbs are not "stars"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R897t8GSYQ
All of the images are CGI and are not evidence this is hilarious if not ridiculing their own narratives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdprRT_X62E
NASA is in trouble, Musk is the successor as minds are changing. It isn't a political debate either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ1S62QxxWM
Healing will be necessary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrbySLw5PJU
>The thousands of people who take the flights can't all be paid actors.
You're only scratching the surface awaiting to find out how much effort the propaganda machine is pushing for supporting their narrative and fiction. There's planes flying circles over the ocean to pretend people travel for hours across the globe. Why do airports have security so high they scan you, file you and make sure to check your background when traveling? Why do planes have windows so small so we can't see if it's curved or not?
No one can NOT "cross the Antarctica".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtMc5-hmZhA
Moon reflects earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJTPZf-3bN0
Many official science-oriented channels gives you hints
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klpDHn8viX8
And they try to pass a message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzC92VJJnvg
Muslims tries to redpill us on the consensus and they're the "bad guys"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbyytwO4U9Q
The elite knows and tries to give you a hint right there in plain sight, Noble prizes tells you the big lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txlCvCSefYQ
Horizon is infinite, all objects in the distance fades into blue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaeNEyLrgDM
Hollywood debunking space itself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjQx9wI4y9w
Again, no, Flat Earth isn't a religion and not linked to any.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=289cGJ7hOkM
Orbs are not "stars"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9R897t8GSYQ
All of the images are CGI and are not evidence this is hilarious if not ridiculing their own narratives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdprRT_X62E
NASA is in trouble, Musk is the successor as minds are changing. It isn't a political debate either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ1S62QxxWM
Healing will be necessary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrbySLw5PJU
>>173046
planes cruise at about 30,000ft altitude. the highest we cant go is about 125,000ft with altitude balloons. youre not serious are you nigger? no airplanes going to catch any curvature of the earth, let alone no curvature is detected at the 125k height. so why are you going off on a tangent about airplanes exactly? please do explain
>>173062
that is the curse of pride and sadly very few will break from it. the saddest part is some of the most intelligent anons I know post on /mlpol/, so i would think minds attract like minds. They take such a fast dive into political information, and do a good job at extrapolating what is true from it all. But in doing so they are just working with what has been given to them, and their priorities arent exactly serving their own interests. their intentions are very good.
both sides here want to make redpilled horsepussy posts, but were both at contention at how much we can attract waves of newfags to our cause. they believe were repelling the newfags, because flat earthers are fighting the machine itself. both the globers and newfags that come here are still defending and serving the machine, because its all theyve ever know to work with for the cause
planes cruise at about 30,000ft altitude. the highest we cant go is about 125,000ft with altitude balloons. youre not serious are you nigger? no airplanes going to catch any curvature of the earth, let alone no curvature is detected at the 125k height. so why are you going off on a tangent about airplanes exactly? please do explain
>>173062
that is the curse of pride and sadly very few will break from it. the saddest part is some of the most intelligent anons I know post on /mlpol/, so i would think minds attract like minds. They take such a fast dive into political information, and do a good job at extrapolating what is true from it all. But in doing so they are just working with what has been given to them, and their priorities arent exactly serving their own interests. their intentions are very good.
both sides here want to make redpilled horsepussy posts, but were both at contention at how much we can attract waves of newfags to our cause. they believe were repelling the newfags, because flat earthers are fighting the machine itself. both the globers and newfags that come here are still defending and serving the machine, because its all theyve ever know to work with for the cause
>>173066
It's not about whatever other stuff you've said, that's mudding the water.
Planes from Jakarta can take multiple different routes to reach the same end destination of Bogota at the same time and vis-versa.
Here's the post for good measure >>172832
Show how that's possible on any flatearth model.
If it's real that flatearth model can do it.
It's not about whatever other stuff you've said, that's mudding the water.
Planes from Jakarta can take multiple different routes to reach the same end destination of Bogota at the same time and vis-versa.
Here's the post for good measure >>172832
Show how that's possible on any flatearth model.
If it's real that flatearth model can do it.
1714750679.mp4 (3.1 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:01:47, 9D3960AA4ECD161632D4F4492475E23C-3231056.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>173063
>I'll start projecting that'll show them!
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173062
>Why aren't they rolling over and rejecting what's true for what I say?
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173064
>It's all propaganda! Everything is propaganda! Trust everything I say.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173066
>Why are smart people not submitting to what we say? Obviously we're correct because we say it enough times.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>I'll start projecting that'll show them!
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173062
>Why aren't they rolling over and rejecting what's true for what I say?
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173064
>It's all propaganda! Everything is propaganda! Trust everything I say.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173066
>Why are smart people not submitting to what we say? Obviously we're correct because we say it enough times.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173071
>no they can't
So the only explanation is that it's a globe. Good Game, maybe try a bit more next time.
>no they can't
So the only explanation is that it's a globe. Good Game, maybe try a bit more next time.
Anonymous
No.173073
1714752011.webm (5.1 MB, Resolution:888x500 Length:00:00:07, E28CC87FE89E35ACD36117E54079CB7F-5372571.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>173071
>stooopp. please stop. i can't take it anymore.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173061
> F U C K
> Y O U
>
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>stooopp. please stop. i can't take it anymore.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173061
> F U C K
> Y O U
>
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>>173072
you claimed you can fly in both directions and end up in the same spot, not me retard. what you said is false
you claimed you can fly in both directions and end up in the same spot, not me retard. what you said is false
>>172917
>something on a model i dont claim
You claim that the earth is flat and surrounded by an ice ring, right? That's the model presented.
>irrelevant
No, it is relevant. It's proof of curvature.
>focused on topic
The debate is the topic.
>>172941
>I'm thinking if I should make a thread in /ga/ about this nigger.
If you meant /qa/, I dare you to. I'm not him, but I know how it will go.
>>173062
>This is the guy they sent in to debunk
DT has been a member of this site community for five times as long as you have, newfag.
>but this place sounds different like they're organizing to be stubborn
You're free to leave if you don't like it here.
>deciding what answers should be posted, what direction, who should intervene and shout their ha, got em!
We are a close-knit community built up over years of pony fandom comradery and /pol/ memes. We are skilled debaters and shitposters because we were raised on 4chan. I wouldn't expect a newfag Facebook boomer to understand.
>For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
This is the nigger calling the kettle black.
>>173063
There you go posting redundant images again. And you wonder why everyone on this site hates you, when you refuse to adopt chansite culture or basic poster etiquette.
Lurk moar, faggot.
>>173064
>For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
This should be pretty easy to prove in that case. Have flat earthers tried? Have you tried taking those flights and recording them? That should be within your budget range if you want to disprove it.
All of those flight logs are public. You could stand outside the airport and watch the planes take off, without even being inside them. You could track where they go, because they're observable from the ground.
Fabricating those flights is logistically impossible to conceal, and no flat earther has ever tried to disprove it. You just go screeching about Masons and demand John Locke tier empirical evidence by denying anything that you don't personally see, without even attempting to go see it for yourself, even though it's in reach.
>Why do airports have security so high they scan you, file you and make sure to check your background when traveling?
A product of the war on terror.
Those flights still existed in the 90s before airport security increased.
>Why do planes have windows so small so we can't see if it's curved or not?
Commercial airliners don't fly high enough to see the curve of the earth anyway.
The windows are small to save money and ensure safety on a pressurized aircraft, and also to give every aisle a window.
>>173071
>theres only one line flying from one place to the other in a straight direction.
[citation needed]
There are four different flight paths. They pass over populated and tens of thousands of people participate. You could take all four of those flights yourself. In the link provided you can even see when the planes are taking off and schedule flights.
>take meds
More projection.
>its just immature
You're on a chansite dedicated to discussing the viscosity of Pinkie Pie's vaginal fluids. Idk what you expect.
>>173074
I claimed that. I proved it with independently verifiable evidence from multiple sources. You did not even try to disprove the existence of the flights, which you now claim are completely fabricated for no reason other than that they contradict your worldview.
I challenged you on an intellectual debate thinking that you would produce good faith arguments and intelligent counters, but all you have done is delay, deny, and and dodge the questions.
>something on a model i dont claim
You claim that the earth is flat and surrounded by an ice ring, right? That's the model presented.
>irrelevant
No, it is relevant. It's proof of curvature.
>focused on topic
The debate is the topic.
>>172941
>I'm thinking if I should make a thread in /ga/ about this nigger.
If you meant /qa/, I dare you to. I'm not him, but I know how it will go.
>>173062
>This is the guy they sent in to debunk
DT has been a member of this site community for five times as long as you have, newfag.
>but this place sounds different like they're organizing to be stubborn
You're free to leave if you don't like it here.
>deciding what answers should be posted, what direction, who should intervene and shout their ha, got em!
We are a close-knit community built up over years of pony fandom comradery and /pol/ memes. We are skilled debaters and shitposters because we were raised on 4chan. I wouldn't expect a newfag Facebook boomer to understand.
>For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
This is the nigger calling the kettle black.
>>173063
There you go posting redundant images again. And you wonder why everyone on this site hates you, when you refuse to adopt chansite culture or basic poster etiquette.
Lurk moar, faggot.
>>173064
>For pride always blinds. Like it figuratively gouges your eyes out that you can no longer open them to see.
This should be pretty easy to prove in that case. Have flat earthers tried? Have you tried taking those flights and recording them? That should be within your budget range if you want to disprove it.
All of those flight logs are public. You could stand outside the airport and watch the planes take off, without even being inside them. You could track where they go, because they're observable from the ground.
Fabricating those flights is logistically impossible to conceal, and no flat earther has ever tried to disprove it. You just go screeching about Masons and demand John Locke tier empirical evidence by denying anything that you don't personally see, without even attempting to go see it for yourself, even though it's in reach.
>Why do airports have security so high they scan you, file you and make sure to check your background when traveling?
A product of the war on terror.
Those flights still existed in the 90s before airport security increased.
>Why do planes have windows so small so we can't see if it's curved or not?
Commercial airliners don't fly high enough to see the curve of the earth anyway.
The windows are small to save money and ensure safety on a pressurized aircraft, and also to give every aisle a window.
>>173071
>theres only one line flying from one place to the other in a straight direction.
[citation needed]
There are four different flight paths. They pass over populated and tens of thousands of people participate. You could take all four of those flights yourself. In the link provided you can even see when the planes are taking off and schedule flights.
>take meds
More projection.
>its just immature
You're on a chansite dedicated to discussing the viscosity of Pinkie Pie's vaginal fluids. Idk what you expect.
>>173074
I claimed that. I proved it with independently verifiable evidence from multiple sources. You did not even try to disprove the existence of the flights, which you now claim are completely fabricated for no reason other than that they contradict your worldview.
I challenged you on an intellectual debate thinking that you would produce good faith arguments and intelligent counters, but all you have done is delay, deny, and and dodge the questions.
>>173075
dont ask me how to explain your flatearth.ws meme
>>173077
you showed a model that just assumes what we claim about continental placement and size. thats called a strawman. you showed zero sources for antipodal flights besides the meme website psyop flatearth.ws. there are international flights and then there are layovers. cope about it.
still waiting for the part where you conduct your own experiment to find curvature. STILL not done yet
dont ask me how to explain your flatearth.ws meme
>>173077
you showed a model that just assumes what we claim about continental placement and size. thats called a strawman. you showed zero sources for antipodal flights besides the meme website psyop flatearth.ws. there are international flights and then there are layovers. cope about it.
still waiting for the part where you conduct your own experiment to find curvature. STILL not done yet
1714761540_1.png (21.3 MB, 3609x3753, flight route - amelia earhart flight around the flat earth.png)
1714761540_2.png (14.7 MB, 3609x3753, flight route - perth to buenos aires have to cross the equator twice.png)
Some more flight routes.
>>173078
>you showed a model that just assumes what we claim about continental placement and size
The model I posted was consistent with the picture in the OP, as well as several of the flat, circular maps that flat earthers in this thread have posted. If this is not consistent with your worldview, explain what your worldview actually is so that we can have this debate. Surely, you have at least one map or picture that demonstrates the world as you believe it to be. If you don't have a picture, do your best to put it in words.
>you showed zero sources for antipodal flights besides the meme website psyop flatearth.ws
Scroll up and look again. I posted flight paths from the airlines themselves using airline trackers, and I can post even more sources if that's what you're challenging me to do.
And regardless of the "model", it should not be possible for four different planes to leave im different directions, passing over different continents, and arrive at the same location with near identical travel times on ANY fat, disk-shaped world that has Antarctica as it's surrounding ice wall and the north pole st it's center. Try drawing the lines yourself on a map that represents your worldview.
>you showed a model that just assumes what we claim about continental placement and size
The model I posted was consistent with the picture in the OP, as well as several of the flat, circular maps that flat earthers in this thread have posted. If this is not consistent with your worldview, explain what your worldview actually is so that we can have this debate. Surely, you have at least one map or picture that demonstrates the world as you believe it to be. If you don't have a picture, do your best to put it in words.
>you showed zero sources for antipodal flights besides the meme website psyop flatearth.ws
Scroll up and look again. I posted flight paths from the airlines themselves using airline trackers, and I can post even more sources if that's what you're challenging me to do.
And regardless of the "model", it should not be possible for four different planes to leave im different directions, passing over different continents, and arrive at the same location with near identical travel times on ANY fat, disk-shaped world that has Antarctica as it's surrounding ice wall and the north pole st it's center. Try drawing the lines yourself on a map that represents your worldview.
>>173079
These maps are almost identical to the maps that showed the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
That's fine though. Now we have a consensus on what your worldview is. Now, using one of those maps, show how those flight paths can be drawn over the map, passing over the relevant cities and continents, and still have the same distance overall. It should take you only a few minutes on gimp/photoshop to draw the lines.
These maps are almost identical to the maps that showed the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
That's fine though. Now we have a consensus on what your worldview is. Now, using one of those maps, show how those flight paths can be drawn over the map, passing over the relevant cities and continents, and still have the same distance overall. It should take you only a few minutes on gimp/photoshop to draw the lines.
1714767157_2.jpg (300.4 KB, 1500x1039, antarctica-flight-routes.jpg)
1714767157_3.jpg (934.8 KB, 1600x1273, F9B1ABA9-0DDD-4218-A9C9-E8A0D221CDD4.jpg)
>>173080
>using airline trackers
this isnt evidence in your case. you can track airlines and place the lines on any map you like. this doesnt make your globe reality. try again
>And regardless of the "model", it should not be possible for four different planes to leave im different directions, passing over different continents, and arrive at the same location with near identical travel times on ANY fat, disk-shaped world that has Antarctica as it's surrounding ice wall and the north pole st it's center. Try drawing the lines yourself on a map that represents your worldview.
explain the pics. you only care about using the flat earth model when you find an inconsistence with it, even though it still works better than your fake cartoon globe
>>173081
>using airline trackers
this isnt evidence in your case. you can track airlines and place the lines on any map you like. this doesnt make your globe reality. try again
>And regardless of the "model", it should not be possible for four different planes to leave im different directions, passing over different continents, and arrive at the same location with near identical travel times on ANY fat, disk-shaped world that has Antarctica as it's surrounding ice wall and the north pole st it's center. Try drawing the lines yourself on a map that represents your worldview.
explain the pics. you only care about using the flat earth model when you find an inconsistence with it, even though it still works better than your fake cartoon globe
>>173081
Anonymous
No.173086
>>173080
also, models are presentations. you can present and use a model without knowing its full certainty. all maps are scale models of reality, yours just lacks prediciton power the most
also, models are presentations. you can present and use a model without knowing its full certainty. all maps are scale models of reality, yours just lacks prediciton power the most
>>173085
>this isnt evidence in your case. you can track airlines and place the lines on any map you like
You've missed the point. The only thing that matters is what direction the planes leave in, what cities they pass, and when they arrive. All of these variables are independently verifiable.
Also, those pics don't depict the Jakarta-Bogota flights. Show what the Jakarta-Bogota flights would look like in your worldview.
>you only care about using the flat earth model when you find an inconsistence with it
And you don't care about inconsistencies? Inconsistencies that demonstrate impossible events on flat earth should be proof that the earth are not flat.
>even though it still works better than your fake cartoon globe
Then prove it. Draw the Jakarta-Bogota lines with similar distances on your flat map. It works fine on a globe map. If it works better on your flat map it should be easy to prove.
>you can present and use a model without knowing its full certainty.
It doesn't need to be certain, it just needs to be addressed. This would be the case on any flat/circular map, because all circles have the same geometry. The models in the pics I posted all gave similar geography to the pics you've been posting now, so it should be easy to draw the lines.
>yours just lacks prediciton power the most
My (global) map predicts that these planes that fly over different continents from the same point arrive at the same location within an hour of each other.
I am giving you the opportunity to do the same with your own map. Does it have the same predicting power?
>this isnt evidence in your case. you can track airlines and place the lines on any map you like
You've missed the point. The only thing that matters is what direction the planes leave in, what cities they pass, and when they arrive. All of these variables are independently verifiable.
Also, those pics don't depict the Jakarta-Bogota flights. Show what the Jakarta-Bogota flights would look like in your worldview.
>you only care about using the flat earth model when you find an inconsistence with it
And you don't care about inconsistencies? Inconsistencies that demonstrate impossible events on flat earth should be proof that the earth are not flat.
>even though it still works better than your fake cartoon globe
Then prove it. Draw the Jakarta-Bogota lines with similar distances on your flat map. It works fine on a globe map. If it works better on your flat map it should be easy to prove.
>you can present and use a model without knowing its full certainty.
It doesn't need to be certain, it just needs to be addressed. This would be the case on any flat/circular map, because all circles have the same geometry. The models in the pics I posted all gave similar geography to the pics you've been posting now, so it should be easy to draw the lines.
>yours just lacks prediciton power the most
My (global) map predicts that these planes that fly over different continents from the same point arrive at the same location within an hour of each other.
I am giving you the opportunity to do the same with your own map. Does it have the same predicting power?
>>173087
planes have stops and can go any direction to get to stops. not sure what youre getting at. youre the one not caring about inconsistencies with all international flight paths, the thing you keep ignoring.
>My (global) map predicts that these planes that fly over different continents from the same point arrive at the same location within an hour of each other.
I am giving you the opportunity to do the same with your own map. Does it have the same predicting power?
you can make paths on a flat surface and they can meet up. why do you think all 4 bases on a baseball field are connected?
planes have stops and can go any direction to get to stops. not sure what youre getting at. youre the one not caring about inconsistencies with all international flight paths, the thing you keep ignoring.
>My (global) map predicts that these planes that fly over different continents from the same point arrive at the same location within an hour of each other.
I am giving you the opportunity to do the same with your own map. Does it have the same predicting power?
you can make paths on a flat surface and they can meet up. why do you think all 4 bases on a baseball field are connected?
>>173088
>planes have stops and can go any direction to get to stops.
So how do these planes arrive within an hour of eachother, for what according to a disc model would be significantly different distance?
>not sure what youre getting at
Holy shit, I've said it 20+ times at this point.
>youre the one not caring about inconsistencies with all international flight paths, the thing you keep ignoring.
Answer the questions about the Jakarta-Bogota flights, and then we'll move onto the others.
>you can make paths on a flat surface
Do it.
>and they can meet up.
With the same/similar distance? Prove it. Draw the lines and measure them.
>why do you think all 4 bases on a baseball field are connected?
Completely different shape, and not relevant to the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
>planes have stops and can go any direction to get to stops.
So how do these planes arrive within an hour of eachother, for what according to a disc model would be significantly different distance?
>not sure what youre getting at
Holy shit, I've said it 20+ times at this point.
>youre the one not caring about inconsistencies with all international flight paths, the thing you keep ignoring.
Answer the questions about the Jakarta-Bogota flights, and then we'll move onto the others.
>you can make paths on a flat surface
Do it.
>and they can meet up.
With the same/similar distance? Prove it. Draw the lines and measure them.
>why do you think all 4 bases on a baseball field are connected?
Completely different shape, and not relevant to the Jakarta-Bogota flights.
>>173089
already answered the question, you cant read obviously. tell us when and where there is detectable curvature of the ground, you havent done so. nothing you said proves anything about flight paths forming around a curvature. you just keep screaming "SaMe DiStAnCE" which means nothing, thats why i brought up the baseball field anology but you completely missed the point on what the anaology meant. why are all lines on the 4 bases the same distance?
already answered the question, you cant read obviously. tell us when and where there is detectable curvature of the ground, you havent done so. nothing you said proves anything about flight paths forming around a curvature. you just keep screaming "SaMe DiStAnCE" which means nothing, thats why i brought up the baseball field anology but you completely missed the point on what the anaology meant. why are all lines on the 4 bases the same distance?
>>173091
>already answered the question
Point to the post where you answer the questions (plural).
>you havent done so
Yes we did, lol.
>nothing you said proves anything about flight paths forming around a curvature
I demonstrated an observable phenomena that is only possible on round earth, and challenged you to come up with an alternative explanation/map for it. You did not produce an explanation/map.
>"SaMe DiStAnCE" which means nothing
It does, for the reasons stated above.
>baseball field anology
Apples to oranges. Draw lines on the map and show how they work on flat earth.
Also, for the record, if you leave along the any of the lines of a baseball field, you'll get there slower than if you just cut across the middle of the field, because you moved at a 45° angle different. Your own example demonstrates the flaw in your logic.
>the anaology
Use a map, not an analogy.
>already answered the question
Point to the post where you answer the questions (plural).
>you havent done so
Yes we did, lol.
>nothing you said proves anything about flight paths forming around a curvature
I demonstrated an observable phenomena that is only possible on round earth, and challenged you to come up with an alternative explanation/map for it. You did not produce an explanation/map.
>"SaMe DiStAnCE" which means nothing
It does, for the reasons stated above.
>baseball field anology
Apples to oranges. Draw lines on the map and show how they work on flat earth.
Also, for the record, if you leave along the any of the lines of a baseball field, you'll get there slower than if you just cut across the middle of the field, because you moved at a 45° angle different. Your own example demonstrates the flaw in your logic.
>the anaology
Use a map, not an analogy.
>>173093
scroll up to read the replies, not going to go in circles for you. you keep ignoring the answers like a fucking troll, just like how right now you avoid the answer of WHERE THE FUCK detectable curvature is. no phenomenon you points to says anything about the ground curving.
why the fuck did you bring up cutting across the field? total retard non sequitur. all the lines are the same distance. stop going off track
scroll up to read the replies, not going to go in circles for you. you keep ignoring the answers like a fucking troll, just like how right now you avoid the answer of WHERE THE FUCK detectable curvature is. no phenomenon you points to says anything about the ground curving.
why the fuck did you bring up cutting across the field? total retard non sequitur. all the lines are the same distance. stop going off track
>>173094
>scroll up to read the replies, not going to go in circles for you. you keep ignoring the answers like a fucking troll
None of those replies have a chart with the flight paths for the Jakarta-Bogota flights on a flat earth map. You are evading the point at hand.
>answer of WHERE THE FUCK detectable curvature is
I just gave you an example.
>stop going off track
>why the fuck did you bring up cutting across the field?
Because planes can fly in any direction, so obviously the diagonal distance, which is significantly shorter than the others, is a viable path to take.
Why
>scroll up to read the replies, not going to go in circles for you. you keep ignoring the answers like a fucking troll
None of those replies have a chart with the flight paths for the Jakarta-Bogota flights on a flat earth map. You are evading the point at hand.
>answer of WHERE THE FUCK detectable curvature is
I just gave you an example.
>stop going off track
>why the fuck did you bring up cutting across the field?
Because planes can fly in any direction, so obviously the diagonal distance, which is significantly shorter than the others, is a viable path to take.
Why
>>173095
none of us ever claimed a model, we claim the discription of the grounds surface which is appears non curving around a 3959 mile radius, water seeks it level.
please give me a number, an experiment ANYONE can conduct themselves WITHOUT relying on institutions blindly. at what height can you detect curvature of the earth? news flash: ZERO GLOBERS HAVE ANSWERED THIS CORRECTLY
>Because planes can fly in any direction, so obviously the diagonal distance, which is significantly shorter than the others, is a viable path to take.
what "diagonal distance"? diagnonal relative to what? no one ever said shit about diagonal
none of us ever claimed a model, we claim the discription of the grounds surface which is appears non curving around a 3959 mile radius, water seeks it level.
please give me a number, an experiment ANYONE can conduct themselves WITHOUT relying on institutions blindly. at what height can you detect curvature of the earth? news flash: ZERO GLOBERS HAVE ANSWERED THIS CORRECTLY
>Because planes can fly in any direction, so obviously the diagonal distance, which is significantly shorter than the others, is a viable path to take.
what "diagonal distance"? diagnonal relative to what? no one ever said shit about diagonal
>>173096
>none of us ever claimed a model, we claim the discription of the grounds surface which is appears non curving around a 3959 mile radius, water seeks it level.
You just described a model.
>at what height can you detect curvature of the earth?
Surface level. Medieval trebuchet users factored it into calculations.
>diagonal distance
The distance cutting across the field.
>none of us ever claimed a model, we claim the discription of the grounds surface which is appears non curving around a 3959 mile radius, water seeks it level.
You just described a model.
>at what height can you detect curvature of the earth?
Surface level. Medieval trebuchet users factored it into calculations.
>diagonal distance
The distance cutting across the field.
Anonymous
No.173098
>>173097
flat = discription of surface, not model
>Surface level. Medieval trebuchet users factored it into calculations.
no they didnt liar. that calculation would require a presumption for no good reason. theres no experiment that proves this and you will not show it cause it doesnt exist.
>The distance cutting across the field.
okay what about a diamond shape? perhaps theres reasons why we cant fly directly over the north pole? too much electric distrubance near the north pole for planes to handle
flat = discription of surface, not model
>Surface level. Medieval trebuchet users factored it into calculations.
no they didnt liar. that calculation would require a presumption for no good reason. theres no experiment that proves this and you will not show it cause it doesnt exist.
>The distance cutting across the field.
okay what about a diamond shape? perhaps theres reasons why we cant fly directly over the north pole? too much electric distrubance near the north pole for planes to handle
This place is a honeypot or infiltrated by big gov shills. No one defends the globe this hard.
>>173101
I would say commie infiltrators. They are the same ones denying that virology is a fraud and getting hyper-triggered by the covid saga.
I would say commie infiltrators. They are the same ones denying that virology is a fraud and getting hyper-triggered by the covid saga.
>>173101
>>173103
I have hardly ever encountered a community who's this narrow-minded and skeptic and this aint even the worst thread on a so-called esoteric chan. I even held more civil conversation with atheist and science lovers when discussing the paradigm of truth being what we perceive and there's no objective reality beyond our reference point which makes sensorial perception valid. I don't know to engage. The anon who keeps saying " do you verify the meme" must have driven their teachers insane in school.
>>173103
I have hardly ever encountered a community who's this narrow-minded and skeptic and this aint even the worst thread on a so-called esoteric chan. I even held more civil conversation with atheist and science lovers when discussing the paradigm of truth being what we perceive and there's no objective reality beyond our reference point which makes sensorial perception valid. I don't know to engage. The anon who keeps saying " do you verify the meme" must have driven their teachers insane in school.
>>173104
>The anon who keeps saying " do you verify the meme" must have driven their teachers insane in school.
I don't know that but I positively know he feels entitled to shit on this tread because he and a couple of frens hate OP. So petty as that.
>The anon who keeps saying " do you verify the meme" must have driven their teachers insane in school.
I don't know that but I positively know he feels entitled to shit on this tread because he and a couple of frens hate OP. So petty as that.
>>173101
Oh yeah, it's totally a glownigger nest. The jannies disable IP hashing just for you.
You should leave as soon as possible, for your own safety.
Oh yeah, it's totally a glownigger nest. The jannies disable IP hashing just for you.
You should leave as soon as possible, for your own safety.
1714839375_2.png (207.9 KB, 713x541, 0EF0F2FDA4392494D3E98CD8FDA55035-212851.png)
1714839375_3.png (125.1 KB, 1405x800, 5FC6C9538BAEFFF2FC43F906E5C987EA-128093.png)
>>173104
>narrow-minded and skeptic
You can thank OP for burning goodwill.
>paradigm of truth being what we perceive and there's no objective reality beyond our reference point
Truth is immutable nobody fucking has the whole picture except God. As in there is objective Truth.
There's also personal perception which is a description of experience, which is true that experience did happen not the validity in full everywhere.
You're trying to assert that perception is enough that subjective truth wins over objective truth.
That's false, and that is why leaving you to peddle the subjective truth is the only real true thing is damaging.
Why?
Because nobody would be able to do anything that just requires knowledge that can only be gained that our senses as is can't deal with.
>Oh but Nikon camera
Accepting a tool to expand what is seen, but how do you know what it sees and what you see is in fact reality.
This whole thing is the thought experiment of Maxwell's Daemon, its just some other being feesing you experience after experience how could you even know the difference between it and reality.
What Maxwell came to, is a Trust in God that reality and you being you is true.
>I don't know to engage
You can start with answering the plethora of questions about how shit works in flatearth.
Because alot of everyday stuff simply doesn't work in flatearth all together.
The question is how useful is it?
So far it's actively harmful, there are no positives that it brings that work.
Because all the shit everyone does occurs flatearth can't be true. Nothing on large scales would function.
>Why won't you accept our cult like fascination?
I considered it long ago as an experiment and verified how the world works.
Pony shaped planet is still more accurate than flatearth.
>But you can't trust anybody else except us!
I considered that too and frankly it's just doing the whole Maxwell's Daemon again.
>Why do holololo memes work, but flatearth doesn't?
Flatearth just isn't true. Maybe it's fun to briefly think of that as one possible interpretation of reality, but it doesn't work. It can't be proven true.
In the objective search for truth, the objective truth, flatearth fails so does every member in trying to find the objective truth.
The objective truth doesn't care about feelings or if that answer is disagreeable. It can be continually tested and still show what it shows.
Flatearth doesn't withstand the vicious and vigorous testing.
The 9 Gorillion, has obvious strange and dumb things that contest what is known about how objective reality functions.
It's been tested, viciously, vigorously, relentlessly, everywhere and every defense utterly destructed.
Why the fuck haven't you all been trying?
If this is what trying for flatearth is, please stop. Your lackadaisical methodology is anti-persuasive to anybody forged in the fires of truth.
>I don't get why our memes are considered bad to everyone else?
They don't have the harder, hotter, sharper, awe inspiring truth in it.
You have some surface level swill at best.
>Why are you so interested in pushing back?
I don't want this stronghold of truth to be compromised.
You're subjective wishy washy methodology can't forge the deep, vital truths of this life. It can't embed hard impenetrable truth into your being.
It can't withstand in the arena of truth.
It fails, the Truth confirmed by God almighty doesn't.
People might not ever get to what is fundamentally True, but we can try. That methodology you bring will hinder that.
If you all played by the Truth Finding rules of debate we wouldn't be here. But it would mean that you'd see exactly how well flatearth withstands.
Or you all could have gone the fun posting route expanding the creativity and odd-ball mimd expanding thinking.
Or you all could have embraced pony.
Neither was taken, so this thread stands as to the shallow level of advertisement vs the combined methodical penetrative Truth Finding of hoerse fuckers.
So spam for spam our spam is categorically better than yours.
>>173107
>Didn't even try debating.
>Just spammed shit tier images.
>I won because I don't care about anybody else in this community
Why the fuck are you here?
>narrow-minded and skeptic
You can thank OP for burning goodwill.
>paradigm of truth being what we perceive and there's no objective reality beyond our reference point
Truth is immutable nobody fucking has the whole picture except God. As in there is objective Truth.
There's also personal perception which is a description of experience, which is true that experience did happen not the validity in full everywhere.
You're trying to assert that perception is enough that subjective truth wins over objective truth.
That's false, and that is why leaving you to peddle the subjective truth is the only real true thing is damaging.
Why?
Because nobody would be able to do anything that just requires knowledge that can only be gained that our senses as is can't deal with.
>Oh but Nikon camera
Accepting a tool to expand what is seen, but how do you know what it sees and what you see is in fact reality.
This whole thing is the thought experiment of Maxwell's Daemon, its just some other being feesing you experience after experience how could you even know the difference between it and reality.
What Maxwell came to, is a Trust in God that reality and you being you is true.
>I don't know to engage
You can start with answering the plethora of questions about how shit works in flatearth.
Because alot of everyday stuff simply doesn't work in flatearth all together.
The question is how useful is it?
So far it's actively harmful, there are no positives that it brings that work.
Because all the shit everyone does occurs flatearth can't be true. Nothing on large scales would function.
>Why won't you accept our cult like fascination?
I considered it long ago as an experiment and verified how the world works.
Pony shaped planet is still more accurate than flatearth.
>But you can't trust anybody else except us!
I considered that too and frankly it's just doing the whole Maxwell's Daemon again.
>Why do holololo memes work, but flatearth doesn't?
Flatearth just isn't true. Maybe it's fun to briefly think of that as one possible interpretation of reality, but it doesn't work. It can't be proven true.
In the objective search for truth, the objective truth, flatearth fails so does every member in trying to find the objective truth.
The objective truth doesn't care about feelings or if that answer is disagreeable. It can be continually tested and still show what it shows.
Flatearth doesn't withstand the vicious and vigorous testing.
The 9 Gorillion, has obvious strange and dumb things that contest what is known about how objective reality functions.
It's been tested, viciously, vigorously, relentlessly, everywhere and every defense utterly destructed.
Why the fuck haven't you all been trying?
If this is what trying for flatearth is, please stop. Your lackadaisical methodology is anti-persuasive to anybody forged in the fires of truth.
>I don't get why our memes are considered bad to everyone else?
They don't have the harder, hotter, sharper, awe inspiring truth in it.
You have some surface level swill at best.
>Why are you so interested in pushing back?
I don't want this stronghold of truth to be compromised.
You're subjective wishy washy methodology can't forge the deep, vital truths of this life. It can't embed hard impenetrable truth into your being.
It can't withstand in the arena of truth.
It fails, the Truth confirmed by God almighty doesn't.
People might not ever get to what is fundamentally True, but we can try. That methodology you bring will hinder that.
If you all played by the Truth Finding rules of debate we wouldn't be here. But it would mean that you'd see exactly how well flatearth withstands.
Or you all could have gone the fun posting route expanding the creativity and odd-ball mimd expanding thinking.
Or you all could have embraced pony.
Neither was taken, so this thread stands as to the shallow level of advertisement vs the combined methodical penetrative Truth Finding of hoerse fuckers.
So spam for spam our spam is categorically better than yours.
>>173107
>Didn't even try debating.
>Just spammed shit tier images.
>I won because I don't care about anybody else in this community
Why the fuck are you here?
1714848576.jpg (75.4 KB, 700x434, source - elaborate - explain - debate me.jpg)
Anonymous
No.173112
1714849990.mp4 (1.1 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:35, B7E261F3D49BBE6A374BB0A951C8B8F2-1156307.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>173111
>I'm going to project what I do to you, it's what the R.F.R. says to do.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
>I'm going to project what I do to you, it's what the R.F.R. says to do.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI
Anonymous
No.173113
>>173111
You've never debated in good faith either.
Answer his fucking questions. All the unanswered questions make you look like a total hack. If you addressed all of the arguments and questions eloquently and completely, maybe people would take you more seriously.
You've never debated in good faith either.
Answer his fucking questions. All the unanswered questions make you look like a total hack. If you addressed all of the arguments and questions eloquently and completely, maybe people would take you more seriously.
Anonymous
No.173114
1714851157.mp4 (875.3 KB, Resolution:602x360 Length:00:00:15, Mare Goodman 3d [The mlp Antithology 2].mp4) [play once] [loop]
![Mare Goodman 3d [The mlp Antithology 2].mp4](/images/thumb/F6CC6508946DAAD6BF8B91E9467EA2B9-896284.png)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW6hgOc3wuI
Wow WOW AGAIN Not even 24 hours ago I was looking for content and this scientist came on my first search results and now that video just came out
You're going to assume me it's all a coincidence (not) This place _is_ monitored.
Wow WOW AGAIN Not even 24 hours ago I was looking for content and this scientist came on my first search results and now that video just came out
You're going to assume me it's all a coincidence (not) This place _is_ monitored.
>>173115
Horse fuckers are always ahead of the curve. Just like the origin donors.
Which may look like /mlpol/ is the actual zeitgeist of world culture.
But it's statistics and search reinforcement. Look for more stuff and it'll keep on trying to feed more of that stuff.
Anyway.
If you know the large scale patterns and genuine reasons why they appear you won't ever be extremely surprised. Maybe shocked, but it's all rather mundane at this point.
I can't see the future, but I have some estimations.
God always blows what I expect out of the water.
I know what they know, but they don't know what God knows.
It's all fuzzy logic and rational (if flawed) logical chains. Remove ethics from the consideration and you too can predict what the movers and shakers want to try to do too.
Horse fuckers are always ahead of the curve. Just like the origin donors.
Which may look like /mlpol/ is the actual zeitgeist of world culture.
But it's statistics and search reinforcement. Look for more stuff and it'll keep on trying to feed more of that stuff.
Anyway.
If you know the large scale patterns and genuine reasons why they appear you won't ever be extremely surprised. Maybe shocked, but it's all rather mundane at this point.
I can't see the future, but I have some estimations.
God always blows what I expect out of the water.
I know what they know, but they don't know what God knows.
It's all fuzzy logic and rational (if flawed) logical chains. Remove ethics from the consideration and you too can predict what the movers and shakers want to try to do too.
Anonymous
No.173117
>>173115
The hell are you smoking? Someone posts a video on youtube during the same week people have an argument on the Internet, and you think they're connected?
>This place _is_ monitored.
Then leave.
The hell are you smoking? Someone posts a video on youtube during the same week people have an argument on the Internet, and you think they're connected?
>This place _is_ monitored.
Then leave.
Anonymous
No.173118
1714871769.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:34, Antithology Submission TD In Equestria.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>173115
>another one of thousands of videos on flat earth
>must be spies
You never debated in good faith, dishonesty is you brand.
>another one of thousands of videos on flat earth
>must be spies
You never debated in good faith, dishonesty is you brand.
>>173115
>Flat Earthers lack scientific education
What a fat liar. Flat Earthers are the most read on sciene, on the oher hoof, her audience, the normies, have no clue about physics and take her baloney as authoritative.
>Flat Earthers lack scientific education
What a fat liar. Flat Earthers are the most read on sciene, on the oher hoof, her audience, the normies, have no clue about physics and take her baloney as authoritative.
Anonymous
No.173120
Anonymous
No.173121
Anonymous
No.173123
1714873904.webm (627.0 KB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:02, 1697057__safe_screencap_pinkie+pie_twilight+sparkle_g4_the+maud+couple_animated_book_female_floating+head_hallucination_i+never+learned+to+read_illiteracy_lip+b.webm) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.173215
>>173213
>I don't even think these mongs come here for ponies
The boomer doesn't post ponies in any context other than to dump the reaction image folder that he downloaded from somewhere.
>I don't even think these mongs come here for ponies
The boomer doesn't post ponies in any context other than to dump the reaction image folder that he downloaded from somewhere.
>>173116
Fuck off. (((You))) have reached the second lowest stage of uselessness: willfully becoming a dipshit bandwagoning goy. Pack up your pigshit retardation, then go back to plebbit, soycialpol, or whatever intellectual cesspool cucked you into losing all logic and reason.
Fuck off. (((You))) have reached the second lowest stage of uselessness: willfully becoming a dipshit bandwagoning goy. Pack up your pigshit retardation, then go back to plebbit, soycialpol, or whatever intellectual cesspool cucked you into losing all logic and reason.
>>163904
>>166137
DM is more than disputed, it must stop, it was not detected on expected, possible forms. I think, and I'm certain for studying the question very seriously, that it's literally a mirage. The billions spent on it could have been distributed on various other projects, it deserves a whole topic about why people no longer trust science, I wrote a thing about it or two.
General relativity works on every scale. A JEW
Newton's law works on our scale, could be different in bigger scales. A long time ago Mordecai Milgrom OH NO ANOTHER JEW came with an idea, to adjust a little bit Newton's F=ma formula.
>>163905
>>163908
Gravity works as is, wanna try? You will never be RainbowDash, if you test it it will punish you by deadly force or proportional pain to your idiocy - but there is a small detail to be added or completed that fixes the thing at say, 98%.
The rest? Can be explained by general relativity, on a huge scale the density of stars, gas, matter in the center of galaxies curves space and time itself.
That's going to sound crazy but time doesn't elapse the same in a constellation in the center of the milky way as it does on the outer arms, the same way you have a few microseconds lag between satellites and earth's stations.
About string theory, nah. Higgs field buried any possibility to string theory to be realistic. Go check THAT JEW who came up with Modified Newtonian Dynamics. it's not a huge modification but will explain a few things in space. Again it's theory but Jonathan Oppenheim, OH NO ANOTHER JEW would agree to stop with the quantum bullshit other than in femto scales.
I mean, come on, I read things associated with quantum mechanics that would makes Paul Dirac A FRENCH HON HON spin in his grave.
Last thing would rather be the age of the universe itself, I'd say it tends to an infinity, but not 13,7 to 14 billion years, but that's because of George Lemaitre A CHRISTIAN who came up with the idea of a big bang.
Guess that's it, if I'm not clear feel free to ask. Flatters should just be ignored, plain and simple but this topic is funny anyways.
>>166807
chatGPT just aggregates the bullshit it finds to make more bullshit, just like every AI, it's just a lazy way to research and an amplifier of bullshit. also fine tuned by the company to push the agenda they want.
>>173219
He's right you know. Also,
>goes to Derpibooru
You don't belong here.
>>166137
DM is more than disputed, it must stop, it was not detected on expected, possible forms. I think, and I'm certain for studying the question very seriously, that it's literally a mirage. The billions spent on it could have been distributed on various other projects, it deserves a whole topic about why people no longer trust science, I wrote a thing about it or two.
General relativity works on every scale. A JEW
Newton's law works on our scale, could be different in bigger scales. A long time ago Mordecai Milgrom OH NO ANOTHER JEW came with an idea, to adjust a little bit Newton's F=ma formula.
>>163905
>>163908
Gravity works as is, wanna try? You will never be RainbowDash, if you test it it will punish you by deadly force or proportional pain to your idiocy - but there is a small detail to be added or completed that fixes the thing at say, 98%.
The rest? Can be explained by general relativity, on a huge scale the density of stars, gas, matter in the center of galaxies curves space and time itself.
That's going to sound crazy but time doesn't elapse the same in a constellation in the center of the milky way as it does on the outer arms, the same way you have a few microseconds lag between satellites and earth's stations.
About string theory, nah. Higgs field buried any possibility to string theory to be realistic. Go check THAT JEW who came up with Modified Newtonian Dynamics. it's not a huge modification but will explain a few things in space. Again it's theory but Jonathan Oppenheim, OH NO ANOTHER JEW would agree to stop with the quantum bullshit other than in femto scales.
I mean, come on, I read things associated with quantum mechanics that would makes Paul Dirac A FRENCH HON HON spin in his grave.
Last thing would rather be the age of the universe itself, I'd say it tends to an infinity, but not 13,7 to 14 billion years, but that's because of George Lemaitre A CHRISTIAN who came up with the idea of a big bang.
Guess that's it, if I'm not clear feel free to ask. Flatters should just be ignored, plain and simple but this topic is funny anyways.
>>166807
chatGPT just aggregates the bullshit it finds to make more bullshit, just like every AI, it's just a lazy way to research and an amplifier of bullshit. also fine tuned by the company to push the agenda they want.
>>173219
He's right you know. Also,
>goes to Derpibooru
You don't belong here.
>>173220
>revisionist apologetics
lmao you cant make this up. yep mlpol is definitely on glownigger watch.
remember anons, always demand tangible evidence for the 3959 mile radius. watch how they try squirm and dodge this
>revisionist apologetics
lmao you cant make this up. yep mlpol is definitely on glownigger watch.
remember anons, always demand tangible evidence for the 3959 mile radius. watch how they try squirm and dodge this
Anonymous
No.173222
>>173221
>mlpol is definitely on glownigger watch.
Oh no! We've been spotted! Now we will lose valuable posters and this thread will die!
>mlpol is definitely on glownigger watch.
Oh no! We've been spotted! Now we will lose valuable posters and this thread will die!
Anonymous
No.173223
Anonymous
No.173224
>>173220
>>Guess that's it, if I'm not clear feel free to ask.
Yes I do have several questions and I have no idea which one to start with.
>>Guess that's it, if I'm not clear feel free to ask.
Yes I do have several questions and I have no idea which one to start with.
>>173219
I honestly unsure what is the thing with you, or you are getting paid, or you suffer from the fluoride/vaccination combo.
I honestly unsure what is the thing with you, or you are getting paid, or you suffer from the fluoride/vaccination combo.
1714947757.jpg (110.7 KB, 509x457, 8586238bc5289800b1aa29655503a1d4.webp.jpg)
Anonymous
No.173234
1714948714.mp4 (1.1 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:04, mlp_silverstream_brown_isnt_an_element_of_harmony_kek_real.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Anonymous
No.173235
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-300] [301-400] [401-500] [501-600] [601-700] [701-800] [801-900] [901-1000] [1001-1100] [1101-1200] [1201-1300] [1301-1400] [1401-1500] [1501-1600] [1601-1700] [1701-1800] [1801-1900] [1901-2000] [2001-2100] [2101-2200] [2201-2300] [2301-2400] [2401-2500] [2501-2600] [2601-2700] [2701-2784] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
2784 replies | 1433 files | 282 UUIDs | Page 8