/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

thtfx.jpeg
900px-SunAnimation.gif
748.png
Flat Earth.
Anonymous
No.148613
148618 148626 148828 149171 150423 157834 163824
This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
2161 replies and 1090 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.163874
cb7.png
>>163872
>Welcome to the flat earth thread, where feelings dont care about your facts.
Anonymous
No.163875
>>163873
Do you? Do you think 'if I post a pony, theres legitimacy to my post'? Do you think 'if I post a pony, then my illegitimate post is somehow legitimate'?
Post all the ponies you want, you're STILL never gonna have a leg to stand on, intellectually.
Anonymous
No.163876
163877 163879 163880
you'd think someone would just fly over antarctica and shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Anonymous
No.163877
163880
>>163876
>shut down this whole conspiracy by now
Actually it will blow it out.
Anonymous
No.163878
d7ifcrl1dvw81.png

Anonymous
No.163879
>>163876
Your argument assumes that the flat earth hasnt been exhaustively debunked previously, except it has. All that remains are flat earthers who can't comprehend the evidence, which unsurprisingly is a gradually increasing number, as the standard of education likewise gradually decreases.
Show people a picture of Earth, its dismissed as CGI. Cite that the picture predates computer generated imagery, its dismissed as Nasa/masonic shilling.
The proof is already there. Its BEEN there since BEFORE any of us were even BORN. Theres more proof than there are technical analysts to explain its VALIDITY as proof.
Which leads one inexorably to the conclusion that Flat Earth has never been about truth. Hence why I say:
Flat Earth is an INcompetence hierarchy
Anonymous
No.163880
>>163876
>>163877
Apologies, I only touched on Antarctica. Funny you propose this, because there is an experienced pilot who is organizing just that.
The thing about a flight over the southern pole is, it takes a particular setup to accomplish. Being as though there arent commercial airstrips on Antarctica, not just ANY plane will do. It requires a plane with the logistical capacity to make the entire trip WITHOUT refueling. Remember when I said 1.5 million chartered? Thats because thats what it is going to cost to charter a provate plane capable of making the flight (and that is WITH the pilot doing the flying for no charge).
Now, flatties LOVE to point to Antarctica because of their certainty of an ice wall. At least, thats the NOT-disingenuous flatties.
Meanwhile, there are the flatty grifters who realize that its bullshit, but their name and livelihood is tied to the flat earth theory (DITRH, etc.) and so they are dug in at 'Antartica' because "no one could possibly expend that much time/resources/effort to fly over Antartica". Meaning, as long as no one DOES, they can continue to posture and act, regardless of the level of intellectual dishonesty they are operating from.
Recall, I already told you whats on Antarctica, and why the international treaty became a thing; its evidence of a megalithic human civilization/technology that defies the historical record to such a degree that the control systems would implode if readily known.
Spoiler alert, its not the masons nor NASA at the heart of it, its the CHURCH.
Anonymous
No.163881
163882
I wrote a long post but happened ot deleteed it. Oh, well. I might rewrite it but the gist of it is that I don't see why we should be fighting. Let us just discuss this impersonal and on topic that goes for both sides to different extents perhaps but still.
Anonymous
No.163882
>>163881
I'll come back and rewrite this. I have reasons for what I'm saying and I don't really know if this short post gives enough context.
Anonymous
No.163884
163886
6aa7892f727325f7.png

Anonymous
No.163886
163887 163890
>>163884
Fake NASA shill, the sun doesnt go behind the earth, it rotates above it. This is clearly intended to undermine flat earth progress in the worldview.
Im false flagging as a/the flatty, if it doesnt come across
Anonymous
No.163887
163888 163889
File (hide): 02D93F38DF2456EE5C3E33B1761BC0B0-11303627.mp4 (10.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:47, Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Red Pill 415 - (fake moon landing)_EDIT.mp4
>>163886
>NASA
Well, zog told everybody but normies can't help themselves.
Anonymous
No.163888
163890
>>163887
Fake and shilling. Clearly, since the earth is flat, that any claims of curvature are false.
Cuz the earth is flat.
Checkmate globies.
The earth is FLAT
Anonymous
No.163889
163890
>>163887
Zog convinced everyone that the flat earth is ROUND cuz they're Satanists, and who u gonna believe, satanists or ME who says what god says cuz I say that god says what I say = flat earth, checkmate atheists.
Anonymous
No.163890
163891 163892
>>163888
>>163889
>>163886
Wow, this is just what OP has said throughout this entire thread and not butchered at all. You guys are comedy geniuses.
Anonymous
No.163891
163892 163895
Premiere_063.jpeg
>>163890
>Shills
They (or it?) are applying textbook masonic tactics for gaslighting.
They state exactly what the opposite side says with a tone of incredulity and sometimes mixed with sarcasm in an attempt to discredit and to diminish validity. That said, they will avoid to draw attention to the fact that utterly demolish the whole heliocentric model: the curve can't be found.
Anonymous
No.163892
>>163890
Experience
>>163891
Except for the pics I posted months ago, which you wont touch,... cuz totaly not btfo, couldnt be that...
And my posts aside, you're about 24 citations behind, asfar
as 'refuting' a spherical earth or 'asserting' a flat one
Anonymous
No.163893
163896
fe 1.png
fe 2.png
fe 3.png
fe 4.png
fe 5.png

Anonymous
No.163894
fe 6.png
fe 7.png
fe 8.png
fe 9.png
fe 10.png

Anonymous
No.163895
>>163891
>Shills
>Implying
You sound like /ptg/ calling everyone a 'shill' for disagreeing with you in a flat earth thread on this tiny board.
Anonymous
No.163896
163897
>>163893
Nobody calls flat earthers hateful. They just call them dumb.
Anonymous
No.163897
163898
>>163896
I suppose so but people do call nazis dumb as well so I wouldn't put much stock in what people say.
Anonymous
No.163898
163899
>>163897
Yeah, although I feel like it's a false equivalency. People call Nazis dumb sometimes, but I seldom hear anyone call flat earthers hateful, unless they want to associate them with another group.
Anonymous
No.163899
>>163898
Yeah, we agree on this. I never heard anyone call flat earthers hateful and I don't see how one would argue that they are.
>it's a false equivalency
I think you misunderstood. I meant that people say that everyone that disagrees with consensus is dumb so if you meant, which isn't clear from your post, to appeal to their authority then I disagree that they have one.
This post got a bit overwritten but you get me.
Anonymous
No.163901
163902
Was the post about catapults deleted?
Anonymous
No.163902
>>163901
>catapults
Here >>163824
Anonymous
No.163903
163904
42.png
>Coach Redpill
>2022.06.06 Physics and Epistemic Viciousness
>Dark Matter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHI_eSsgTF4
This is a commentary on the science "experts" who make shit up and sustain lies in order to keep their jobs.
Anonymous
No.163904
163905
>>163903
Dark matter is just a theory, a disputed theory.
Anonymous
No.163905
163908
>>163904
Same than gravity.
Anonymous
No.163908
163940 164141
tn1a6s1y3qd41.jpg
>>163905
Well, I guess you could say that.
In truth, a group of scientists came up with Dark Matter because they considered it to be the only explanation for why gravity seems to function differently at the far edges of the galaxy, as if some extra invisible mass were weighing things down and holding stars together. It's not a theory without merit, as there could be plenty of things beyond this world that we're not able to perceive, but an alternative mode of thought would be that perhaps the laws of physics simply aren't consistent throughout all of the vastness of space.
There are of course other theories to explain this. I think String Theory gives an alternative to it.
Anonymous
No.163940
>>163908
>meme
It sums it all.
Anonymous
No.164025
905.jpg
t7qUo9u.jpeg

Anonymous
No.164027
164028 164029
Imagine being ruled by shitty memes
Seriously, imagine you couldnt think for yourself and had to rely on Facebook to do your thinking for you.
Now i.agine your FB-tier wtfe got btfo and you LITERALLY had no lrg to stand on, but had to pretend cuz 'shame is bad'.
How's that whole 'being a nonce' thing working for you, OP? Learned to differentiate between,.. oh Im kidding. OP doesnt want to actually THINK, he just wants to pretend so that the audience THINKS he's thinking.
But yes I am bad/evil/wtfe ur scripture says is 'bad'.
Keep not doing what you're told is bad. Thats 'healthy', Im told.
Anonymous
No.164028
164029 164030
>>164027
Imagine failing to sage shitty threads.
Anonymous
No.164029
vvvtc34.png
>>164027
>>164028
Ah, (you).
Anonymous
No.164030
164031
>>164028
Imagine thinking that a neglecting of sage was happenstance
Anonymous
No.164031
164032 164033
>>164030
Imagine bumping threads that shit up the board.
Anonymous
No.164032
478.jpg
>>164031
Anonymous
No.164033
>>164031
Imagine wanting the board clean for all the..............

............
nothing
Anonymous
No.164034
If the earth isn't flat why do flights from USA to Japan take time?
Anonymous
No.164035
164036 164037
maxresdefault.jpg
20.png
>PhD Proves Globe Model False (4:34 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6J7WDjXouc
Mirror:
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/phd-proves-globe-model-false-re-uploaded:1
Anonymous
No.164036
164354
Screenshot_20220609-033336_DuckDuckGo.jpg
>>164035
Whoops, thats's embarrassing
Anonymous
No.164037
>>164035
Let me guess, you calculate Pi as 3.14, don't you?
Anonymous
No.164055
164056 164085
cpc.jpg
Hey OP, I was just in another one of my random information on the internet comas and I have a genuine question:
What causes the circumpolar current around the latitude of Drake's Passage (pic related on ball Earth)
Since there's no rotation, nor is there gravity, what would push this much water around?
Anonymous
No.164056
164057
>>164055
See >>163033
Anonymous
No.164057
164058 164059
>>164056
well, not quite. This explains the tides (kinda, I'm not entirely happy with "well, we don't know but its not the moon") but it doesn't explain the uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude. If tides were caused by the bobbing of the earth's surface in the ocean, as explained by Mr. Dubay, there would be a uniform reaction towards the ice wall, not round it. Think ripples in a pond.
Anonymous
No.164058
>>164057
I suppose I spoke too soon because I didn't finish the video, but even the second explanation of the world mountain and the whirlpool doesn't explain uniform motion around the poles. If this were the case, you'd see almost no circumpolar current, or a circumpolar current that reverses with the tides.
Anonymous
No.164059
164060
>>164057
>uniform west>east movement of the entire ocean at that latitude
I guess we have to wait for access for independent researchers.
The freemason's "just trust us" is not cutting it any longer.
Anonymous
No.164060
164061
>>164059
Independent researchers are allowed to sail the Drake Passage and the circumpolar open ocean. In fact, Dubay references quite a few of them in his videos. Are you saying Dubay is referencing Masons?
Anonymous
No.164061
164062
>>164060
Don't play dumb, you perfectly know that I'm referring to the area under the 60th parallel, specifically Antarctica.
Anonymous
No.164062
164063
>>164061
I'm not. The circumpolar ocean current starts at the southern tip of South America.
Anonymous
No.164063
164064
>>164062
>starts
Says who?
Anonymous
No.164064
164065 164066
>>164063
Hendrik Brouwer (Dutch explorer who developed the route through the current in the early 1600s for spice trade with India)
James Cook (circumnavigated the polar region, iirc he's specifically mentioned by Dubay)
Vito Dumas did so single-handedly during WWII without any knowledge or assistance from world governments
I'll keep looking if you need more names
Anonymous
No.164065
>>164064
oh, and Jon Sanders of Australia has done it 11 times.
Anonymous
No.164066
164067
>>164064
Dude, I sailed the Drake channel 10 years ago two times, I know the place and is hell when choppy, the strong currents are normal because the waters accelerate at that point. Frequently and unexpected weather conditions are the norm, they change without warning in a matter of a couple of hours.
Anonymous
No.164067
164068
>>164066
have you circumnavigated at that latitude? All of these people mentioned (excepting Brouwer) did.
Anonymous
No.164068
164069
>>164067
>circumnavigated
Not circumnavigation, but circurm-continent voyage.
Anonymous
No.164069
164070
>>164068
so you went round Cape Horn. I'm... proud? of you? but by your reckoning you're missing about 50 thousand miles of journey.
Anonymous
No.164070
164071
>>164069
>Cape Horn
It is called Cabo the Hornos by the locals.
Anonymous
No.164071
164072 164075
>>164070
Sure. We're getting off track. I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into. Are you willing to do so, or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong?
Anonymous
No.164072
164073 164096
>>164071
>I've provided plenty of sources for you to look into
The only trusted source is your own eyes. Sailing there without interference.
Anonymous
No.164073
164074
>>164072
Then why reference all these ancient and modern sources when you haven't seen these things with your own eyes? This isn't a disputed fact. Your sources confirm it, my sources confirm it, ball earth sources confirm it, there's a current that goes steadly east to west round the world at the latitudes south of the three southern capes and north of Antarctica. Nobody disputes this that's been round the world at that latitude, including sources you yourself have put forward. Its established fact.
Anonymous
No.164074
>>164073
my apologies, steadily west to east. map dyslexia getting the better of me once again
Anonymous
No.164075
164076
>>164071
>or are we discounting every circumpolar expedition to ever happen as wrong
Enough derailing, the chart is already established and clear faggot >>149243
By the way, that map is super accurate when using a sextant.
Anonymous
No.164076
164077
>>164075
okay, I'm not disputing the map, the shape of the earth, or any other point you've brought up. I simply want to know what your explanation is for an established, fairly stable circumpolar current (and I suppose the winds that go with it, but that's very likely explainable in your model by the motion of the water)
Anonymous
No.164077
164078 164097
>>164076
Again, independent research is needed.
Anonymous
No.164078
164079
>>164077
Independent research has been done and matches the facts I've presented. If its not independent enough for you, I'm terribly sorry, but if someone who is actively hiding from world governments (Vito Dumas) makes the claim, I'm going to call them independent
Anonymous
No.164079
164080 164097
8495.gif
>>164078
>Independent research has been done and matches the facts
Sure.
Anonymous
No.164080
164081
south-edged-equal-azimuth.jpg
>>164079
I accept your concession.

By the way, if you'd just said "it matches up when you view the whole oceanic current map in context of the flat earth" I would have probably taken you at face value, but you're so tied to the very few sources you have that you can't do independent research yourself.

I still don't know if your theory has any merit, but I'm 100% sure now that you, personally, do not.
Anonymous
No.164081
164082 164085
>>164080
In fact, I'm going to go absolutely top tier schizophrenic here and note a few things.
In this diagram, the redder a current, the warmer its water, and per established science, these are the surface currents, whilst cold blue currents are usually much deeper. IF your polar gyre exists, you could explain these currents as warm water being sucked into the pole from the surface, and cold water being pushed back down through the deep ocean. This removes the need for a "breathing" gyre and allows a much more plausible forceful, periodic underswell, possibly because this supposed northern polar whirlpool exists inland on the aforementioned 4 islands, and it "runs out" of water because its recycling effect exceeds the inflow of surface water. Since the land surface, per Dubay, rests ON the ocean, not on underlying crust, this allows for a massive inflow of water to the central reservoir, a relatively quick emptying of the reservoir _under_ the land surface, and a repeat.

There, I just answered your question for you, since you're completely incapable of independent thought.
Anonymous
No.164082
229.png
>>164081
Anonymous
No.164083
164086 164087
How remiss of me
https://youtu.be/7u61hzEG82s
Anonymous
No.164085
164090
>>164055
>>164081
Welcome to the flat earth thread
Anonymous
No.164086
164089 164095 164098
>>164083
>Sci-Fi Dan
A prominent NASA paid shill.
Anonymous
No.164087
164089 164093 164094
>>164083
C'mon, it is obvious that it is about to make fun of a dumbass that can barely articulate his thoughts.
The NASA ballers can rapidly extinguish the Flat Earth discoveries if debate is arranged, but, like the jews they won't do that and pick on low hanging fruits instead while claiming to be on the right.
Imagine if the negro tyson would debate Dubay, but... NASA knows that will be PR disaster.
Anonymous
No.164089
164091
>It hurts to Change your world view: The Thread
Flatters will cope forever.
>>164087
>>164086
>NASA
Nasa has no power you retards.
Anonymous
No.164090
>>164085
Thanks. The problem here seems to be that Dubay has an extremely compelling and calming voice. I watched his history of flat earth and I was honesty a little hooked until he went on his autistic tard rage about the flat earth society
Anonymous
No.164091
164092 164095
>>164089
>Nasa has no power you retards.
I disagree.
You believe all their lies, right?
Anonymous
No.164092
>>164091
Nigger what lies do they even tell?
Anonymous
No.164093
>>164087
>Tyson wont argue rhetoric with a virtual child cuz NASA is scared of the blowback
Imagine unironically thinking this
Anonymous
No.164094
>>164087
yes, acknowledging Dubay as worth debating would be a PR disaster
Anonymous
No.164095
164369
>>164086
>>164091
NASA had to sell all its infrastructure to Elon Musk and outsource its rocks to Russia to stay afloat, and it still can't get congress to fund any of its projects (gotta send that tax money to Israel for their space program instead). Wtf do you think they have the funding to do that?
Anonymous
No.164096
>>164072
>this much goalpost moving
So, you'll only accept direct, personal empirical evidence for ideas that challege your worldview, but you're willing to cite sketchy youtube videos for ones that reinforce it?
Talk about hypocrisy.
Anonymous
No.164097
164369
>>164077
>>164079
Define "independent research".
Anonymous
No.164098
164100 164369
>>164086
>NASA paid shill
Citation unironically needed. I wasted an hour looking for any real evidence of this.
Anonymous
No.164099
0b0fbfa14ac00ef11a6354bebaacd4d1--you-ve.jpg
OP is a retarded faggot.
Anonymous
No.164100
>>164098
welcome to the Flat Earth thread, where "paid shill" means "disagrees with my retarded ideology"
Anonymous
No.164117
164118 164121
bs.jpeg
I think this may fit here:

>Russian space chief speaks out on UFOs
https://www.sott.net/article/468677-Russian-space-chief-speaks-out-on-UFOs
Anonymous
No.164118
164119
>>164117
Well, in the last months the UFO psyop went into overdrive in the States, now the Russians join. Is any doubt left that they are together in the space deception?
Anonymous
No.164119
164120
image.png
>>164118
Anonymous
No.164120
fluffle-puff-gif-20.gif
>>164119
Anonymous
No.164121
img3487.jpeg
>>164117
Anonymous
No.164123
XVA3TlB_AzM.jpeg
>V-2 Rocket Films (FLAT) Earth in (1946) - (2:02 long)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVA3TlB_AzM
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@DITRH:f/v-2-rocket-films-(flat)-earth-in-(1946):a
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2XEoiKjE4kAJ/
Anonymous
No.164124
iiIpOs4FgwY.jpg
File (hide): D18735052A2F0A6F941188E72C6DEE14-5067431.mp4 (4.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:00, Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.mp4
>Van Halen - FLAT EARTH.
Good music.
Anonymous
No.164125
164126 164127
>>148614
rate of rotation is not measured in mph.
The earth rotates at 7.29x10^-5 rads/s. Of course you can't feel it spinning. If you were on a roundabout that was spinning at that rate, you would not even be able to see it moving let alone feel anything.
Anonymous
No.164126
>>164125
>rate of rotation is not measured in mph
And yet on the surface and according to the freemasons we are moving at incredible speeds.
Anonymous
No.164127
164129
>>164125
You tried, but OP feels the best defense is a solid ignorance
Anonymous
No.164129
164145 164146
0a.jpg
>>164127
>You tried
Nope, that faggot is trying to obfuscate when bringing angular speeds which are supposedly constant.
Anonymous
No.164141
>>163908
Dark matter has exactly zero relavence to flat earth. Yes the models are incomplete this is known. But they are more than sufficient to describe our solar system. Even classic newtonian gravity is good enough for the most part.
Anonymous
No.164145
>>164129
Wait till he gets to the lack of comprehension that a sphereoid object has a dissimilar sloping curve depending on what longitude one observes the planet at, and that there is no 'single calculation' for the distance to the horizon