/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>158101
>lol globers amirite?
To this point, no. 95% of the comments are vapid "I believe!" posts, often displaying a fundamental lack of comprehension of how evidence, physics, and the scientific method works. But as I indicated, there are occasional posts showing these theories fornthe hogwash they are.

>>158103
>Ex-Flat Earther
I really doubt it. Once redpilled there's not going back.
>SciManDan
Nothing else to add.

>>158105
Wow, rejection without investigation. How very consistent of you. Its no wonder you can unironocally believe/tout this horseshit

>>158106
>rejection without investigation
Projecting much? Huh?

>>158107
>n.. no u!
Lol, what else do you call this but ignorance (as in, ignoring)?
>I really doubt it. Once redpilled there's not going back.

>>158063
I mean ffs, you wont even look at the photos. Because you know, those photos are impossible on a flat earth. I will reiterate, Im not saying the earth is a perfect sphere and Ive made that case earlier ITT. I agree, there are plenty of questions to be asked.

But these pics are impossible on a flat earth, which is why you wont look. Its a pity I cant A. repost the images, and B. delete the post (so I can repost the pics), since I know that even with Mlpol's way-better-than-4chan linked-post-view you wont even slick the link.
But just in case.
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
>>158063
For the record, Im being petulent because that seems to be the only thing that somehow gets through your skulls

For those of you who come to this thread to argue with those who made it, you should really learn to sage.

>>158110
Why, cuz its gonna slide off the board if done so? Have you seen the /vx/ catalog?

>>158111
How new to chansites are you? You don't bump stuff if you don't want to see it, because that perpetuates it. This is the same behavior that ruined /pol/, because the /ptg/ newfags don't know how to avoid bumping shill threads.

>>158113
Whoever said I didnt want people to see it? Sunlight is the best disinfectant anon.

If (you) dont want to see it, apply filters. Shill threads are going nowhere cuz policy. This is about conditioning.

>>158114
No it fucking isn't. This is the internet, and anonymous to boot. Don't spread shitty memes.

>>158116
>no it isnt
Youre entitled to your opinion, but this really doesnt pertain to the thread. Your objections have been noted and summarily dismissed as immaterial. Anything else?

>>158117
Just stop bumping it if you don't like it.

>>158120
Just learn to sage.

>>158122
Then just keep being a nigger I guess.

>>158123
Can we get back to the topic now? Much as I appreciate the attention, its not pertinent to the thread.

>>158123
This.

>globers gonna globe
WOW! I left for a few hours and all these new posts.

Everything is perspective on flat earth.

>>158137
Do they offer any proof or evidence to suggest this visualization, or is it pure speculation in an attempt to fit the theory? I mean, if flat earth were true as depicted, it could be confirmed by 5 people on a conference call, each operating cameras and surveying the sun.
Why hasnt that happened. It would be far easier than tbose hobby rockets and retardedly flawed laser experiments

>>158138
*from separate continents

Also OP, would you be a dear and specify which version of the flat earth mind virus theory you orescribe to? Is it the firmament dome? Plasma disk moon and sun? Are they on the dome, or are they way behind the dome?
At what point do the observable laws pf physics cease to function, and/or what causes their appearance of function.

And the big question:
How long before a predictive model, in which the observable phenomena can be explained using a flat earth, that is cohesive with all the other observable phenomena?

>Space is Scientifically Impossible!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avsCM5lrfN4
More redpills.

>>158144
Jesus Christ,....
>cherry-picked 10-sec clip
Im sure the revised explanation was ommitted because you're so committed to science, right?
>We put a beakur under a glass shroud and tha water escaped!
It doest appear to escape, it appears to diffuse throughout the glass chamber, in fact you can see the point it forms a 4th phasic seal
Oh you dont know what the 4th phase is?
Unsurprising. When water molecules reach a sufficiently excited state - such as when being pulled in one direction by gravity and pulled in the other by vaccuum, they change their configuration from H20 and reforms as H3O2.
H3O2 is orders of magnitude more dense per volume, and is part of the active process that constitutes the Ozone layer that makes a pressurized atmosphere possible, however the water would need to remain in a constantly excited state. Like, if it was at the border of an atmosphere and a vaccuum.
<back to our example
Atmospheric pressure is what enables gravity to operate as a force. Thats why outside the atmosphere (you could liken the atmosphere as an 'event horizon', though not an onerous one as is proposed borders a black hole) is a vaccuum.
>Sea level pressure- 1013.25
>Space pressure- .0000000000000000133
Golly, its almost like the greater dual-force applied on the molecular structure of h3o2 causes a magnification to the structural density of the water due to magnified excitation.
>The water escaped the beaker!
Uh huh, its a vaccuum. Thats what vaccuums do, they distribute molecular material throughout the space until reaching molecular equilibrium. Try adding enough water to the point that the water vapor saturates and starts to condense (read: try FILLING the beaker).
The rest is a series of fallacious conclusions based on the initial fallacious claim.

Still waiting for you to rationalize those boat pics!

>>158145
Correction, the last few minutes actually argues my point funny enough. Thanks for that.

>>158145
>bringing forward rare molecules to obfuscate
>all based on the mythical gravity
And yet, gas masses and fictitious space vacuum cannot co-exist, it is an Impossibility.

>>158147
>I dont know about a thing so its invalid, so gravity is fake
Textbook ignorance

>>158149
>textbook blind faith
Gravity cannot be proven to exist. It is a theory, not a fact.

>>158152
That is a true statement only in subjective perception.
(read: belief =/= truth)

Ill rephrase. Your conviction to flat earth speculation does not make it true, nor does it invalidate the testable, conclusive evidence that such speculation is false.
But of course you can plug you ears and 'la la la' all you want, Ive got plenty more evidince to produce for every laughable insinuated and poorly controlled experiment/video you produce.

>>158153
>That is a true statement only in subjective perception
You were saying?

>>158155
Whoa there, those are some awfully mainstream science sources. You said theyre all a bunch of masons, in on the deception! I guess they arent when it helps your argument?
>You were saying?
Read the articles fgt
>pic related

>>158156
>general relativity
>Eistein pseudo science
Let's go to the root of relativity and derived branches of "theoretical physics", it is nothing more than stunts with numbers that can't be demonstrated in a lab. It is also called charlatanry.
See >>152559

>>158157
Gravity only has the 'title' of theiry becausr they havent yet composed a model that accounts for gravity in quantum-physocal framework. Beyond that there are precise and thoroughly vetted (read: no one can disprove in spite of trying to make a name for themselves by disproving) their models.
Which brings me to the most glaring issue witb flat earthers.
Ego. Everyone wants to be 'the guy' or 'group' that has special knowledge and gets the crediy (or assumes the credit by identifying with the group) unique and better understanding. The problem is, it takes more than watching youtube videos to reach that point even if that was even possible in context.

Any day now, a pr3dictive model would be good. While I wait, address the boats.

>Beyond that, there are precise and thoroughly vetted mathematical models that conform to observed experimental phenomena. Meaning, the data matches the hypothesis, except when getting into quantum physics
Apologies, thats what I meant to say. I get all excited grtting to continually beat a person who wants more. I imagine thats what happend with Tyson in the beginning of that video, and why the clarification was ommitted.

>>158159
>Meaning, the data matches the hypothesis,
I beg to disagree. The methodology used by these hacks is to create mathematical models, not data, to match the hypothesis.

>>158160
Its literally the opposite, and thats literally what flatties do

>>158162
Ahem.
I remind you of >>158157

>>158163
Yes, its theoretical mathematics because it operates at an infinitesimal level that it cant be effectivrly measured with ones eyes. Its not like you can hold a ruler up to it.
And yet the same video that attempts to cstigate modern science by presenting previous credible - by the video's own admission - scientists [i]all of whom had directly cohesive solar and astronomical charts, only varying with the increased precision of the medium. Copernucus for example, determined the orbits of the planets, but he couldnt get it quite right becausr he thought that the orbit was a c8rcle rather than an oblate. Same goes for pre/post Newton, in determining the shape of the planet.

You cant say its all bullshit, and then cite past scientists with contemporary ones, claiming the previous ones were doing it right. Thats a logical fallacy.
Either 1. The earth is flat and its all wrong OR
2. The earth is not flat, and there are elements to the equation that we cant yet account for, given the limited capacity of humans and the amount of time its taken to get as precise as it is.

>oblate
Elipse*
Okay fine, Ill sage my addendums and corrections. Im not unreasonable XP

>>158164
>Yes, its theoretical mathematics because it operates at an infinitesimal level that it cant be effectivrly measured with ones eyes. Its not like you can hold a ruler up to it.
Isn't an overused example is the "Double Slit" experiment, where they keep having the results change every time the experiment is performed, prompting the logical conclusion that more tests need to be performed in under to understand it's intricacies.

And, retards foam at the mouth as an example of how "Quantum Physics is MAGIC".

>>158171
Are you seriously trying to imply theres no validity to the double slit experiment?

>>158164
>You cant say its all bullshit, and then cite past scientists with contemporary ones, claiming the previous ones were doing it right.
You can in your particular case because, while Copernucus and Newton were raving about their flowed understanding of the universe, there was the Greek Antikythera device from 150 BC that was rotting at the bottom of the Aegean sea that perfectly calculates the movement of the planets, the sun, and the stars down to a T.

>>158172
No, I was implying that the double slit experiment is an example of where more data is require to understand the phenominon, but that doesn't stop your average idiot from trying to use it as am example of how science is "magic".

>>158173
So glad you mentioned it
>ancient greek device that accurately charts the planets n stars n shit
Almost like theyre in orbit around the planet that isnt flat, without negating the possibikity of orbits and shit
>THEY were precise tho, and we arent today
I of all people will not contest that ancient cultures were more advanced than modern day, thats one of the salient points of the History is a Lie thread. That you dont realize how that supports my argument is baffling.
>>158174
>magic
Wow strawman
Expectations of the observer that has an observable effect on the experiment, are you denying that?

>>158175
Wait, who are you arguing with?

>>158176
Im arguing with the assertion that theres a firmament dome on a flat earth and that space is a fabrication, when there exost anc8ent devices by which that can be proven false.

Dear Flat Earthers

if the earth is not round why are Radio Towers and Trebuchets designed with the curvature of the earth in mind?

>>158207
That's what we are told.

>>158252
>they faked that too?
In absence of space, that is the most plausible explanation.

>>158253
Imagine unironically saying this

>50 Scientific Facts for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy (Videobook)
>In the interest of preserving for posterity the wealth of flat Earth knowledge and research done during the late 19th and early 20th century, I am continuing a series of audiobook and PDF downloads to make them more easily and widely available. Today's selection is Ebenezer Breach's 1896 booklet "50 Scientific Facts for the Downfall of Modern Astronomy." You can download the free PDF here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/haj0ft8pllkitsy/ebenezer_breach-the_downfall_of_modern_astronomy.pdf?dl=0
>Please Note: Ebenezer Breach was a literalist Christian and makes a few points in this booklet which are clearly not scientific, and potentially not even facts. He also made his own astronomical measurements and had his own figures for the diameter and distance of the Sun, Moon and stars which differed from other 19th century flat Earthers, who themselves didn't have a consensus, other than to always be working with tens, hundreds and thousands, rather than the heliocentrist's millions, billions and trillions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk8hwjceGLo
Mirrors:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/50-scientific-facts-for-the-downfall-of-modern-astronomy-videobook_x4FmCMlheQbd3qY.html
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/50-Scientific-Facts-for-the-Downfall-of-Modern-Astronomy-(Videobook):8
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N9xpGEDH2hFA/

>>158048
Little girls truly are the best

I post this for the globers. I truly doubt they will grasp the concept.

>Black Sun and Moon Phases Explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpj1kha4Ug

>>158414
By the way, I understand that access to the north pole is also forbidden as men with guns are guarding it.

>>158416
>men with guns are guarding it
You talking about the Russians securing their oil reserves?

>How the moon happens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qo7uKmtA3Y
Another one on the Black Sun and the Moon.

>>158414
So, a model that consiats of more than basic sketches should be forthcoming right? I mean, if that actually worked, it should be a simple matter to make a predictive model right? Nevermind the
>the sun and the moon are holograms
assertion, lets see a model.
>158557
>gets the compass and square backward
>look guise, its totally the same! These arre the sekretz obs da maysons
This is why most people need guidance and direction in their initiation. Its very easy to misinterpret and misappropriate meaning from occult symbols

>>158558
>This is why most people need guidance and direction in their initiation. Its very easy to misinterpret and misappropriate meaning from occult symbols
Yeah. It is not what it seems. It is all product of imagination. /s

>>158559
No, it definitely requires a Cypher to properly decode it all. Without that cypher however, one does tend to get blown away on flights of fancy, as evidenced in this video

>>158560
>Cypher
If for cypher you mean Gematria, then all is already set. Freemasonry is Kabbalism for the goyim and its sorcery is almost public.

>>158561
Again, if that were the case, a model would be easily concocted, with easily established values.

Bump

To both remind flaggits which thread IS the flat earth thread, AND to propose a challenge which would give credit to the theory

We know gubmints wont allow entry to antarctica without authorization, whatever that REALLY means (again, no contest, its spoopy).
Why then doesnt someone sail around the perimeter of antarctica - in whatever way you want to visualize - and plot their trajectory? It would make very clear very fast which way the boat was steering, as well as the distances travelled.

>>158740
>Why then doesnt someone sail around the perimeter of antarctica
Read the thread and search it for Captain Cook.
>>149114
>>149115
>>149629

>>158743
Yes! Cook's account is valid, but inconclusive! But I know someone somewhere has the means to livestream the shit, in current year. It will take me a couple decades to manage on my own, but if it hasn't happened by then I absolutely will. Indpendently manned and heavily vetted and doxed for transparency. Like, everyone subject to the third degree oh shit, that was a masonic reference! It literally was, where do you think the term 'giving the 3rd degree comes from? and made public.
And by made public, I mean in a convenient file attached to video records, not citations.

And for clarity, I mean sail at least once, with overlapped cameras cycling their video times ensuring all equipment maintenance is likewise filmed, with live location, compass, etc coordinates visible

Twilight knows. Equestria is flat.

>>158804
Twilight is too smart to believe in a flat equestria

>>158816
Ahem.
See >>149265

>>158816
Equestria is not Earth. It could easily be flat.
At the very least, the sun and moon are smaller that the world.

>>158836
Oh my God! Discord used a turn of phrase and the ponies are looking at a map, It Must be Flat!
>>158840
Its Not Flat, And twilight is too High IQ to believe that it is.

>>158844
It's not necessarily round either though.
Equestria is a fantasy world. It could be shaped like anything. The fact that the Equestria doesn't orbit its sun leaves the door open to completely different cosmologies.

>Dear Spinning Ball Earth Believer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkjjsvgdsZ8
Mirrors:
https://odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/DearSpinningBallEarthBeliever:9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RoARro8TsSf7/

>>159481
>>159482
Bullshit.
With a telescope can be brought it into a full view as shown over and over in this thread.
You are a deceiver.

>>159485
>your photograph evidence of landmarks viewed over planetary curvature are BULLSHIT! cuz I SAY SO!

Reiterating. Pic related displays curvature. Curvature is impossible on a flat earth.
Ergo, there cant be a flat earth.

>>159468
>>159481
>>159482
>>159485
>>159486
For posterity

>>159488
Still waiting
>>158063

>>159488
Also, to clarify:
If one operates off the premise of this linked post, and the subsequently linked posts then OP alleges:
Ita circular reasoning(logic) to refute rhetorical/spurious posturing (see >>159468) especially with unarguable photographic (read: not subject to interpretation) evidence or else it's 'bullshit' for reasons that you're not allowed to know cuz (you) are in on the NASA-masonic conspiracy

Thank you for coming to my TEDtalk

>>159490
>Still waiting
If you believe Earth is round because a local optical effect on perspective, then you have a loooooooong way before to come to your senses.
The pile of evidence disproving the ball and cementing the plane is overwhelming.

>>159492
>wont respond to literal still-frames that refute entire premise
>claims others wont come to their senses
Still waiting on the refutation of Calculus, while we're at it, which wouldnt work if the earth was flat

>>159488
It's spherical logic actually, you are just to dumb to understand it.

>>159842
Both of these retards

>>150294
https://youtube.com/shorts/TVV4TSi9A6k?feature=share
https://www.space220fla.com/
Oh look, Disney made a 220 mile-high elevator, with a restaurant at the top.
Let me guess, its fake?