/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>164757
>Did he propose that you can jump higher during an eclipse?
Ahem.
Or you understand the Gravity Theory, that by the way globers believe, or you don't.

>>164758
Are you agreeing that a person CAN jump measurably higher during an eclipse?
Cuz gravity doesnt support that premise.
And if you think it DOES,... well, you're probably a flat earther

>>164760
Not that you can be taken seriously, but Im legit not sure what you're arguing here. Are you legit thinking that 'if the earth "was" round, you could jump higher during an eclipse', or am I misinterpreting?

>>164761
>Are you legit thinking that 'if the earth "was" round, you could jump higher during an eclipse'
Yup.
The supposedly gravitational forces pulling the tides apply also during an eclipse.

>>164762
Thank you for clarifying. I wont tell you why that's retarded, you probably wouldnt listen anyway. But, I do appreciate the clarification.

>>164763
>I wont tell you why that's retarded, you probably wouldnt listen anyway.
Better try to deny the math, ball zealot.

>>164764
Uhm, the answer is as simple as the "golly, why doesnt the water stick to this tennis ball if gravity" 'argument' that flat earthers try to use to debunk gravity.
So you unironically think that "if gravity and tides, then I can jump higher cuz the moon"?
You further think that the position of the sun and moon can increase or decrease the gravitational forces that a person experiences, such that one 'could' jump higher? Or rather, your understanding of gravity is such that u assume that gravoty supports that position, where if the sun and moon are aligned, the gravitational forces somehow synergize?

>>164765
>You further think that the position of the sun and moon can increase or decrease the gravitational forces that a person experiences, such that one 'could' jump higher?
It should be exactly like that according to Sir issac Newton. But, apparently you have no clue because you just repeat what the freemason school told you.

>>164766
Those pesky freemasons, with their cohesive and basic maths, always tryin'a keep a flat earther 'down' amirite? Niggas be thinking that there be a center of gravity n sheit.
Except, gravitational forces don't stack. Its that basic.

>>164767
Just accept defeat.

To be more clear, (you) assume that 2 forces in alignment should combine. In context, you assume that two aligned gravotational forces cause a synergistic effect, whereby the total gravotational force is increased by the sum of 2 parts.
This is an easy trap to fall into, and I dont fault you for it.
But it's wrong.
Gravity doent work like that. The earth is NEVER outside f the sun's gravitational effect. Yes the tides prouce a small effect, but that effect would perist beyond eclipses. A more 'true' refutation would be to assert that JUST the moon/tides produce this effect. So then, why can't one jump higher during 'high tide'?
The answer?
They CAN.
The problem is its an unmeasurable variance, to miniscule (and contextual) to quantify.
So in summary:
>Why desnt the moon make me jump higher?
It does, infinitesimally.

>>164768
Oh? Like you did when I showed a ship disappearing over the 'nonexistent' curvature?

>>164769
*Too miniscule

>>164769
>It does, infinitesimally.
>>164772
>*Too miniscule
That force is not infinitesimal or minuscule faggots. 42 grams is an important and easily measurable magnitude.

>>164773
In case you are scratching your head with metric units, here in imperial units:

>>164773
Oh? Please display how .1lbs is not an infinitesimal amount when testing vertical leap.

>be 200 pound man
>jump expecting to notice you're only 199.9998 pounds today
>land, feeling normal
Pee pee poo poo the earth is round and so are you

>>164773
That number's bull because it's mostly the force of the sun, which is largely even. So, only a tiny fraction of that number actually changes, so obviously you don't feel a change

The moon has an effect on the ocean but not people because the ocean is much heavier than people are, and the ocean as a liquid has a larger potential to change it's shape

But the sun's effect is felt in tides too, even though it's much weaker than the moon's. When they align it's called a spring tide and when they cancel out it's called a neap tide. This is something people have known about for thousands of years and you can go out and see it yourself.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/springtide.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tide#Spring

I genuinely dare you to actually reply this time

Huh, look what thread isnt getting bumped.
It couldnt be cuz OP knows hes fcked and is hiding
Answer the question

>>164766
That's ad hominem. Get a real argument.

>>164777
>I genuinely dare you to actually reply this time
Later, busy now.

>James Webb Telescope
Let us check the last Photoshop collage out, brought to us by the freemasons.

>>164794
Theres that intellectual honesty you lot are known for. Before you get too carried away, at least TRY to focus
>>164777

>>164795
Later, busy now.

>>164785
Some of us prefer to sage this thread.

>>164792
This guy doesn't even try to prove that the pictures are fake.
He could've at least analyzed the images for noise patterns, ffs.

>>164799
*this video doesn't

>>164794
What evidence do you have that the photos are fake?

>>164773
>42 grams is an important and easily measurable magnitude.
Your normal weight fluctuates by 2-6 pounds every day from minute differences in water weight and, and you still feel the same. How could you feel a difference of less than one tenth of a pound when your body weight already fluctuates more than that every day without feeling different?

>>164773
>42 grams
To put 42 grams in perspective, the average weight of a pair of socks is 60-120 grams.

Put on a pair of socks, and then jump in the air 20 consecutive times.

Now take off those socks and do the same thing.

Note the difference in height achieved, and then take into account that 42 grams is LESS THAN THAT.

Actually, socks could create a difference of friction.
Put 4 quarters in both pockets (44.8 grams in total) and report the results with a sample size of 30 jumps. Be sure to perform the trials 15-20 minutes apart to account for the possibility of getting tired and needing a breather.

Or try doing it before and after drinking 1/5th of a cup of water.
See if you can feel the difference.

He's still busy

back again to bully OP

If, like Dubay says, if Earth were spinning we'd all fall off, why doesn't every passenger in a plane cram to the back when they're being shot forward at 500 miles per hour? I know the answer, do you?

>>164811
its Masonic wizardry bro

>>164810
>back again to bully OP
Really?

The redpilling is getting closer to critical mass by the day. A clip from:

>FEDERAL JUDGE HALTS AIR FORCE VAX REQUIREMENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtNZrvkbceA&t=515s

>>164816
>Look! I found a dumb bitch! Checkmate globeys!
While we're citing dumb bitches, mine has an argument
https://youtube.com/shorts/QsvwswQl6Vo?feature=share
>Why flat earthers believe that shit
https://youtube.com/shorts/0ZDShOguxz0?feature=share
How long has it been known that the earth is round

>>164816
Also, this is OP totally not blatantly ignoring so many of the well constructed arguments ITT. Yes, I know the rule, I'm just making sure anon sees how absurd OP is.
Meanwhile, >>164777 is still waiting

>>164815
Answer the earlier questions.

>>164815
you gonna answer any of the questions you were asked?

>>164820
Still waiting on multiple posts
>>163482 >>163311 >>162824 >>162790 >>164777

OP sure likes to spew shit without following it up

Are there any other reasons the international community/jews would spend so much money on fake researches and bribes to cover up the flat earth nature other than hiding god or aliens?

>>164826
They don't want you to go to Antarctica because of the hyperborean ruins

>>164827
There was more than enough time for them to dig them all up and grind everything into dust, why would they keep them?

>>164827
Hyperborean is the north pole.

>>164829
thats what (((they))) want you to think but there's no land at the north pole

>>164830
Does anybody went to the north pole? Is anybody even allowed to go there?

>>164830
Literally all of the mythology of hyperborea is centered around the direction "north".

>>164831
People cross the pole of the time. The main reason why they don't do it often is because it's dangerous and not always necessary.
Also, international law is laughably impotent, especially when it comes to restricting access to areas. They can't even stop Japs from hunting whales to extinction.
The Arctic circle is expected to become contested between the US and Russia in the near future, since recent ice melts have eased travel and unearthed precious mineral deposits.

>>164831
the Arctic is a lot more accessible than Antarctica, companies will even take you on a tour there for "request a quote" levels of money and the Russians have sailed a nuclear icebreaker all the way there and back

>>164826
>international community
It's really just absurd that people imply that the "international community", many of which are sworn enemies of eachother, could have or would have coordinated a massive intercontinental conspiracy to keep the shape of the earth flat, when they've fallen flat on enforcing virtually any other kind of international law.
We've had two world wars, and a cold war thereafter where countries were fighting tooth and nail for influence. Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
>inb4 Jews
Jews can't even get half of Muslims to stop hating them on a national level. They are not all powerful when it comes to international media influence, especially not in non-western countries.

>>164834
correction: the Russians have sailed at least two nuclear ice breakers to 90 degrees north

>>164835
I brought something like this up earlier in the thread, some guy actively evading both sides in WWII sailed all the way around the world below the capes and OP in his infinite wisdom said he was a globalist masonic shill
see: Vito Dumas

>>164837
Wait, did he imply that Hitler was working for Jews to keep the flat earth a secret...?

>>164838
why do you think he didn't genocide any of them anon?

>>164841
he's laying low until we all forget that he's got questions to answer, don't let him forget.

>>164842
There's only like 25 active posters to this site. He can't possibly think we'd all forget.

>>164842
>>164843
He's not gonna respond, ask me how I know. It's not about convincing him, it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.

>>164835
Yeah, while I'm not saying that the earth is flat, I do want to point out that there's nothing absurd about conspiracies across the world.
The cold war was an illusion and if muslims were a threat they'd stop them from entering countries were they live but they don't. Jews aren't afraid of muslims.
>Why would so many countries pass up the opportunity to spill the beans and embarrass their enemies for political advantage?
Because they aren't nationalist, why would they care what happens to their country?
>>164844
Honestly, I wouldn't respond either. It's a waste of time speaking to people who clearly don't listen to you. The idea of wining debates to further one's ideology's position is a monkey on your back. There's no winning from there. On that note, he has been active in defending his position earlier in thread.
Regardless, winning a debate is not proof that one's position is the correct one.

>>164845
>people who clearly don't listen to yo
Like, you do in fact do not believe ijn this, right? I'm not trying to say you're too arrogant or anything but it's very clear that you strongly disbelieve.

>>164845
>Jews aren't afraid of Muslims
>Muslims aren't a threat
these aren't mutually exclusive, my friend. They let them into your country because they're not a threat to Jews specifically, but they are a threat to you when they're in your country, like any ethnic minority that refuses to assimilate into your culture.

you know.... like Jews

>>164847
Yeah, true. And I know, that's what meant but it came wrong.

>>164838
>Wait, did he imply that Hitler was working for Jews to keep the flat earth a secret...?
WOW, the shilling is intense today.
Everybody knew that Earth is flat at that time. Uncle Adolf included. See >>157419 and >>157473

>>164844
>it's about displaying for anons how ridiculous his premise is.
OP come with facts, but all you have is character assassination and debunked NASA shills. If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).

Flat eartherism is still fucking gay

>>164845
Ngl, that's a rather cucked position to take. If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
>>164850
Ladies and gentlemen, cognitive dissonance at it's finest.

>>164853
>le smug pony response image
This is OP, Ladies and gentlemen

I don’t believe in Flat Earthers

>>164855
And yet the famous curve can't be found.

>>164857
hey OP, scroll back up, you've got a LONG backlog of explanations, faggot.

>>164856
It literally has been. You just dismiss anybody who doesn't reaffirm your existing beliefs as a "NASA/Freemason shill".
I'm beginning to suspect that you wouldn't even accept direct empirical evidence seeing the earth from space.

Also, answer all the earlier questions/refutations, you conniving coward.

>>164859
"my eyes themselves are freemasonic, jesuit shills" - OP, seconds before blinding himself after his ride to space

>>164849
That's a map.
Hitler didn't believe the earth was flat, and the proof of that was that he sent an expedition to the north pole to investigate the Hollow Earth theory.

>>164857
This is simple. The craft was moving with the earth on its axis, just like anything else that moves straight upwards. It's geostationary.
On an unrelated note Baumgartner is a retard for thinking it was possible somehow to break the sound barrier by falling from great height. Terminal velocity is a thing.

>>164862
>he was a retard for thinking he could break the sound barrier by falling
he.... did though?
>reaching an estimated top speed of 1,357.64 km/h (843.6 mph), or Mach 1.25

>>164852
>If one's ideas don't withstand opposition, one needs to bow out, not maintain.
Oh, come on, Anon. That's never stopped any /pol/ack or other imageboard user before.

>>164852
Are you saying there hasn't been a single debate in which the person who was wrong won?
It's a waste of time. In the end it's both for the sake of pride but also for political appeal to others. Both of these don't serve you. Pride gets in the way of intellectual development of ones ideas and influencing others is best done by playing on your homefield, as in books or something. Some sort of focused push than endlessly debating people on the internet.

>>164865
look man I just like checking in here every few days and curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs, don't look any further into it. I'm here for my entertainment, if the rest of you get a chuckle out of it I win even more

>>164850
You repeatedly calling people "NASA shills" without substantial evidence is the definition of character assassination and ad hominem.
>If anybody is looking ridiculous it is (you).
Said the pot to the kettle.

>>164865
>It's a waste of time.
This, tbh. It's not exactly the most productive or interesting use of energy.
>>164866
The beliefs really don't need to be curbstomped. You've already made your point to all 4-5 guys who even bother to read this thread, and OP certainly isn't changing his mind.
Couldn't you find something more substantial to argue about? That argument energy would be better invested making politics threads, or arguing about which mare is cutest.

Outstanding, the shilling is off the chart today.

>>164868
if you think this is the only place I'm shitposting you're very wrong

>>164866
>curb stomping OP's retarded beliefs
Facts are facts. This realm is flat.

>>164871
why does the land float on the ocean if gravity isn't real and density determines where things go on the planet? (both claims of your Mr. Dubay)

>>164872
by the way, my friend, you CAN experimentally prove this one yourself, go outside (hard, I know)
find a rock
drop it in water

>>164870
I didn't say that. I said you're just wasting your time in this particular thread. It would be better spent elsewhere.

>>164874
I don't understand why people think it takes some massive time and effort to bang out 3 sentences or less dunking on a retard. I have a triple digit IQ, this isn't some massive use of my time. Most of the time I do it between work tasks or lift sets

Not sure who is trolling and baiting who.

>>163383
If we're gonna go on about assertions unresponded to, I'd like for OP to respond to NASAs assertion that its a pone