This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg (859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif (6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2670 replies and 1389 files omitted.
>>165996
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
>I disagree, on the basis that of the many experiments presented in this thread, the researchers involved made key mistakes that were not accounted for in their studies.
>key mistakes
Would you mind to post the faulty ones? By the way, Sci-Fi Dan's videos don't count as there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight.
>And at that point you're just exaggerating
A fancy way to deny the mounting evidence.
>Tell me, why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
I'm not aware of it. But, teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
Anonymous
No.165998
>>165997
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
>Would you mind to post the faulty ones?
Give me an example and we can go through them one at a time.
>there are tons of them with video answers and counter video answers with no end in sight
That's a case in point that the answer is "overwhelming".
>teenagers don't sound like people with the proper Physics 101 background to be mentioned.
What about college professors then? What about weather balloon engineers? This isn't an uncommon experiment.
>>165996
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
>why do cameras mounted on balloons floated by teenagers show visible curvature?
Did you know about fish lenses?
File (): E3B5FDBDEB509D20579D0318DA084923-3896174.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:400x224 Length:00:03:37, 81beee.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>166000
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.
Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
>The curve is visible
That's hilarious. There are many posts above debunking the curve, from planes and also proper research balloons, and even rockets.
Clip:
>weather balloon at 120,000 feet with 360 degree view
>>166001
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
In all of this footage, the camera isn't turning at all. It's only showing the earth from one angle.
>There are many posts above debunking
There are also many refutations to those posts debunking those.
>>166004
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
Also, that's not an experiment or a study. It's a complication of videos with favorable views. It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
Considering that the cameras aren't turning, it's more likely that these were shit from planes rather than balloons, which makes their supposed altitude dubious.
>>166005
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
>It doesn't have any sources to verify how high the cameras were, what kind of cameras were used, who did the experiments or when they were done.
You kidding, right? Tell me how NASA and the Russian and Chinese space agencies allow to inspect their experiments, leave alone to check into their installations.
>>166006
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
I was talking about balloons set up by college students. Not NASA or any space agencies.
Give me an example that can actually be analyzed for it's parameters.
>>166007
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
>I was talking about balloons set up by college students.
>college students
C'mon, this is not serious.
>>166008
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
Why is it not serious? This is a common experiment that's been replicated many times. It does not require expensive equipment or corporate gatekeeping.
>>166009
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
College students are so dumb like a high school ass, they may have more misinformation from their (((teachers))) but they are hardly suitable for science.
>>166010
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
People besides college students do it too. I was just using schools as an example to show how simple and affordable it is.
>>166011
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
>simple and affordable
Get a laser, better if you can save a few bits and get an industrial one. The beam doesn't lie, there is no curve.
>>166012
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
Laser experiments have also shown there is a curve, but I'm sure you won't acknowledge them because they didn't get the answer you wanted.
>>166014
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
Yeah. I already did that. It's the same as usual. Undisclosed degrees of precision, miniscule sample sizes, and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>>166016
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
>and not accounting for relevant variables (atmospheric refraction, beam divergence, etc).
>deflected beam
Yeah, right. Let's talk about milliradians now. /s
>>166018
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
>Are you implying that laser beams cannot be refracted?
Don't play the fool. Milliradians have an intrinsic meaning.
>>166021
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
>So that means you shouldn't account for refraction at all when conducting light experiment?
All right, you have no concept of deviation units.
>>166022
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
I could say the same thing about you. When applied on a scale that large, a slight difference will skew the results, and to not account for it *at all* heavily impacts the accuracy of the measurement, especially when the whole experiment is based on the precision of lasers.
>>166023
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
>When applied on a scale that large,
Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature. And in the case of lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
>>166024
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
>lasers applied to this scale, the deviation is negligible.
It is not negligible. This is basically the largest scale experiment.
>Not so large, actually is enough local to appreciate the non-existent curvature.
You're measuring an incredibly huge object (which isn't even perfectly round) and you think size doesn't matter?
Experiment that take larger scales into account and require the been to pass by multiple checkpoints with markers at different distances (but the same heights) show that the beam diverges.
File (): 922478A5CEB7578A5BF60AC59F626B79-3571088.jpg (3.4 MB, 3300x2550, earth-curvature-scale.jpg)
>>166025
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
We are talking distances on the 30-40Km range. The laser deviation is negligible, but the drop in the curvature should be huge. However it doesn't happen, because the there is no curve.
>>166026
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
It is not negligible at that scale, and that becomes apparent when the laser is mounted at an elevated point, and is required to pass by *multiple* markers.
File (): 95B2D544741C89DA7764A7CBFA9B7D1B-557251.png (544.2 KB, 1280x720, lafweawee.png)
>>166027
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
>to pass by *multiple* markers
Yeah, tell how the laser will bend 66,68 feet on 10 miles just to pass through those markers. /s
Anonymous
No.166031
>>166028
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
If the world were flat, the laser should pass each marker at the exact same height. This can be accounted for by placing multiple markers separate distance apart, but at the same height.
Anonymous
No.166039
>SHADOWS NEVER INTERSECT - (3:32 long)
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
>Moon landing fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSGHKD9tQX8H/
Anonymous
No.166043
File (): 50767598B2A63BDCFA60B75252D06FCB-3722834.mp4 (3.6 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:01:34, Southern Stars Quick Take.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>Southern Stars Quick Take
Anonymous
No.166046
File (): 2C398BDE21A46FCD182DD2B3CFD90E68-66927.jpg (65.4 KB, 461x1024, UdBKz0kw-92932349-461x1024.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.166055
File (): 8B73BD935FFB40F4E72F1DC67A1B9ED7-10777306.mp4 (10.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:40, The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).mp4) [play once] [loop]
The ISS orbit visualized on the flat earth map (Azimuthal equidistant projection).
Anonymous
No.166059
File (): 8FA1814624A5EE40E8DB4838275A2396-1328226.mp4 (1.3 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:00:42, THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>THE EARTH IS FLAT says Max Igan
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Now I wait for all the brainwashed sheeple come over and deny the tons and tons of evidence, not to mention personal attacks to Igan.
Anonymous
No.166060
File (): C01F2ADA7EA6D99BC6FD528693B37D8C-53944.jpg (52.7 KB, 640x480, hqdefault.jpg)
File (): F4CE3DF84E9CABFEDDA95B4E62B77A31-698215.png (681.9 KB, 1337x757, Scr0516.png)
>The Earth Is Still Flat | Globebusters Response to Professor Dave - (3:15:07 long)
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
>10-02-22
>Today we fire back at (Not A) Professor Dave's ad-hom attacks and non-sequitur arguments. The Ball Earth community has never had a worse representative and we are going to show why..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSBikaMv9P0
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qVoGfGdw8Axs/
The video is too long but entertaining nevertheless for advocates of the Plane and I'm sure frustrating for most ballers.
Watch till the end and then die in fire.
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
https://youtu.be/wS6DB2Yo-mI?t=140
Or just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
>>166075
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
>just skip to 2:20 and die in fire more quickly
If you want to reaffirm the globe hoax, that clip won't cut it.
Good eye fish camera though.
>>166076
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.
You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
>Good fish eye
You didn't watch from the beginning then.
Cuz it's clearly a direct camera.
I know, you want to maintain your illusions, and you will, but that video alone - let alone the infamous barge-horizon vid - is unequivocable.
You have been living a lie.
And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
Cheers, mate.
File (): 83A45415E59B88F652CC055761E4CFC6-5618883.mp4 (5.4 MB, Resolution:578x480 Length:00:02:48, Globeheads be like.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>166077
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
>And you will have to live with that, whether or not you are man enough to admit it.
A thread already with 1542 posts containing overwhelming evidence that our realm is a plane and you still repeat the masons' lies.
What is it, money or sheer blindness that make you post non-sense?
Anonymous
No.166080
Centrifugal force
Bottom text
Bottom text
File (): 621491300615B065441C049B9C14B436-2299774.gif (2.2 MB, 498x399, my-little-pony-eye-roll.gif)
Anonymous
No.166085
File (): BE3B46E04A9EC7841574944FBC587621-827478.png (808.1 KB, 3968x5528, dcbb7r0-6da512e9-63c9-466d-9823-12293f34e9c7.png)
File (): 74DFC51FFFE5D8B55566F02414494AEF-57243.jpg (55.9 KB, 1278x248, 1665862095321637.jpg)
Anonymous
No.166108
File (): 6982CB4D89B05EE76FE7E6BDD0553E8D-778820.png (760.6 KB, 1366x768, 22058.png)
>Proving the Sun Rotates Over a Flat Earth - Must See Evidence by Corey Kell
>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/
The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
>Corey Kell's Oct 2021 presentation at Flatoberfest
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HInutniQrGvV/
Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8fxEMpXMFcn/
The lecturer is an artillery man and gives a technical explanation why this realm is a plane.
Anonymous
No.166109
>>166098
>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...
Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
>Youtube allows as many flat-earth and lizard people videos...
Not quite true.
The important videos have been banned and the ones with shaky foundations have been allowed to stay, for example anything mentioning the controlled-opposition group known as The Flat Earth Society; which allow the government propagandists to try to keep the globe hoax alive.
I've been there, its epic. https://adventuresmithexplorations.com/cruises/antarctica/
File (): CA56A28DE937FA4E86A3E99D63906C10-79175.jpg (77.3 KB, 1043x640, The Hindenburg on its first flight on March 4, 1936.jpg)
>>166127
Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
Spoiler alert: it is not Antarctica per se, but only the outskirts.
Only a proper airship can go inland and explore the territory, of course, those airships are not available anymore.
>>166129
>They're not illegal.
In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
>They're not illegal.
In a plantation where the inhabitants have to ask permission and pay a fee even to sell homemade lemonade, the construction of such a vehicle is highly doubtful.
File (): BC94069E38FE895880CB87BD8DA864C9-67643.jpg (66.1 KB, 618x763, f-618x763.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.166136
File (): 74C65D1630359E99A2DFA4CF9E4E1556-27761.jpg (27.1 KB, 480x573, yellow-highlight-problems-global-model.jpg)
>>166134
Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
Dark Matter isn't the only theory out there.
It's also not quite that relevant to flat earth.
Anonymous
No.166141
>>166133
Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
Now that just sounds like cope. Go build your blimp and sail to antarctica, put your money where your mouth is.
Anonymous
No.166142
File (): EA370BAE0C6CC83643409CA4F5373837-37980.jpg (37.1 KB, 700x602, flatties.jpg)
>>166128
Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
Like Chronicles of Narnia rules or something? Kek it must feel so magical living in a fantasy world like that.
Anonymous
No.166143
>>166133
No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
No it fucking isn't. People just don't use them because they're inefficient and expensive. Go build your stupid blimp.
File (): BCC052A89FAFAF4240C49A4DF5E9A8AC-146393.jpg (143.0 KB, 768x859, img_7688.jpg)
Anonymous
No.166157
File (): ACF4F75D3CFE0A65DB9919F43CF7B54B-74233.jpg (72.5 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)
This bread is getting slow. Let's have some good old fashioned plane facts.
>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earth
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY
>Refraction, Mirages, Compression and Our Flat Earth
https://odysee.com/@TabooConspiracy:c/refraction,-mirages,-compression-and-our:c
Mirror:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJ0dGLeMDY
>>166162
>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!
Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
>m-my cock isn't small! You're a woman and Earth is flat!
Earth is round and your cock, presumably like your brain, is tiny. You're welcome to disprove me, but given how miserably you've failed at proving the world is flat, I'm not holding my breath.
Anonymous
No.166172
>>166163
He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
He'll probably reply with "read the thread" or some other nonspecific nonargument.
He made this whole thread without IDs just so it wouldn't be so glaringly obvious that he's the only one on this whole site who believes this garbage.
File (): 00234164EBA5A9207C21068064E52DB0-11477148.mp4 (10.9 MB, Resolution:480x852 Length:00:02:30, Forbbiden land_EDIT.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Debunking a globe believer on travels to Antarctica.
>>166243
Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
Wow, guess the earth is flat and all evidence of the Earth's curvature can be safely ignored now.
Anonymous
No.166245
File (): C3C8B247BFEB2E78A790007F0984D067-226695.jpg (221.4 KB, 1200x1082, ax3L9s5q1UOG.jpeg)
>>166244
Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
Glad you brought it up.
The so called evidence you mention is fake and most of it doesn't pass the scientific method test.
>>166243
He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.
As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence, especially since there is a guy that went beyond that point, got fined, and isn't saying the earth is flat I find no claims that he is a flat earther, just a guy that broke a law.
As to why, it is more likely hiding hollow earth before hiding flat earth because this guy went there and is not claiming flat or extended earth.
>>166246
>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence
That's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
>He even says at the end of this video that this is not evidence
That's right. And yet, globe tricksters claim "Trust Us" this realm as we told you.
>>166247
It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
It clearly is as they said on the surface or this guy that got a fine and a month in jail who goes on all sorts of other trips around the world would have said there is uncharted stuff out there as plain as the eye can see. Again, you posted a video that has supported a globe and sooner supports hollow globe before it does any flat model.
>>166248
I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
I don't know anything about a hollow globe. Perhaps you may explain.
And going back to the video, the masons are cockblocking exploration and claiming jurisdiction over sea and land that don't belong to them. Why is that?
>>166249
Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
Clearly not to stop the truth about flat earth because we got a confirmed guy that got there and didn't see anything odd enough to report and they gave him a tiny jail sentence. You can get a similar sentence for walking into Area 51. I assume that such a light sentence is holding back the truth from getting out at each of these places?
File (): FD413DA76AD5BE54C0A05977A1CC2BBC-145349.jpg (141.9 KB, 1500x939, gyiubkj.jpg)
>>166250
The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
The sailor got punished for just to approach the Antarctica shore. For proper exploration what it is needed is an airship to go inland.
>>166251
So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.
So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
So, the data about letting people go there is useless, because no one will ever know until getting an airship.
So, what is the point again? It must be flat because you can't get there, just like Area 51 which is not a flat earth extension, you can't reach it without a plane so you can't ever see the flat earth anyway if you get there, and they must not want people there because of flat earth and no other possible reason including infinitely more logical reasons including a ludicrously big hole...
File (): 454665A940736B9A638243D000124BA0-202433.jpg (197.7 KB, 1117x441, 3qtc34qtv34.jpeg)
>>166252
>It must be flat because you can't get there
Nope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
>It must be flat because you can't get there
Nope.
It is flat because multiple experiments demonstrate that the so called curvature is a blatant lie. The implications of that are enormous and reach multiple levels of the our so called reality.
>>166253
Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
Ok, let's assume it is. What makes the no go zone of Antarctica the flat earth zone when the punishment is no worse than Area 51? I think learning about flat earth and making all lies from the government unveiled much more important than a possible alien crash site when the government is already swearing that aliens exist.
>>166254
>possible alien crash site
Think about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
>possible alien crash site
Think about it. If there is no curvature, then there is no planet, then there is no space, then there is no universe.
>>166255
You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
You aren't understanding me. It is the same level of illegal to go to Antarctica as Area 51. If there is no space and no aliens, learning what is in Area 51 does nothing because there is a lack of information. Going to Antarctica would then logically have the same level of importance which assuming there is no space and no aliens means that there is nothing to learn there either.
>>166256
>You aren't understanding me
Yes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
>You aren't understanding me
Yes, I do.
You want to steer the subject from physical fact about our reality to human jurisdictional legalese.
I'm not biting.
>>166257
If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.
Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
If you understand, answer me. What I am saying is not a distraction, it is a real problem with what you are saying. You have two places you can't go, both have the same punishment, and if there is no space, then you are punished for nothing for going to one of them.
Thus, you are punished for going to Antarctica for the same reason, no reason.
>>166258
>If you understand, answer me.
Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
>If you understand, answer me.
Again, I'm not biting, sorry.
Let's stay on the curvature and the actors cockblocking knowledge.
File (): D30509D157DD3B8F4B0998A98D8EADF6-338284.jpg (330.4 KB, 1068x1529, 6427307.jpg)
>>166261
Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
Then I will give you a formal warning based on Rule 7. You are to engage in actual debate and not use this as a dump for BTFOing actual argumentation. I actually enjoy debating and thinking through alternate earth models and I will not have you simply say you are correct anymore and dump videos you found about this subject and claim everyone is a shill that is baiting you for arguing.
File (): 34E20105858BA3D97A22BFD340042189-373347.png (364.6 KB, 512x433, image-10.png)
Anonymous
No.166264
Maybe OP could have been more approachable when it came to the subject. Well, it was intresting as long as it lasted, thanks OP for the thread.
File (): 0CF35F23DB5DE630BE78EBA522A14BC7-141265.jpg (138.0 KB, 1024x576, 1570692315076.jpg)
File (): 68EDF21A1999D7B1E1D6ADFE212BD246-2070849.png (2.0 MB, 4410x3000, 68EDF21A1999D7B1E1D6ADFE212BD246-2070849.png)
File (): 164626E06C10E40D5ADFF2CEEB518014-187950.png (183.5 KB, 700x900, 1579462675229-0.png)
File (): CA70BF0829979F62F488449C58E57DA6-445586.png (435.1 KB, 1500x1000, CA70BF0829979F62F488449C58E57DA6-445586.png)
>>166262
Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259
>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much
>even too much for the values that position founds
>not even an iota of effort
Impressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful. Only difference is predicting what they will do next.
Thanks fren.
Pics related.
>>166259
>advancing flat earth agenda by literally engaging in a relatively simple and straight foward supposition is too much
>even too much for the values that position founds
>not even an iota of effort
Impressive, the two birds and one stone for everything you stood for was inspiring.
I now know for certain again even if some actions aren't attributed to malice, but stupidity they are still harmful. Only difference is predicting what they will do next.
Anonymous
No.166266
File (): EBF479F8BB6C3224CC618A967AD01BF6-349160.png (341.0 KB, 1920x1080, 6110391.png)
So as a violation of rule 7 what will happen to the thread? Will it be deleted/closed?
Odd, I seem to recall getting shouted down to the point of censure for trying to apply the site rules to this thread, and illustrating OP's bad-faith.
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it
But as always, its okay when (((certain))) staff does it
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-300] [301-400] [401-500] [501-600] [601-700] [701-800] [801-900] [901-1000] [1001-1100] [1101-1200] [1201-1300] [1301-1400] [1401-1500] [1501-1600] [1601-1700] [1701-1800] [1801-1900] [1901-2000] [2001-2100] [2101-2200] [2201-2300] [2301-2400] [2401-2500] [2501-2600] [2601-2700] [2701-2770] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
2770 replies | 1431 files | 277 UUIDs | Page 5