/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>247559
8channel has that 7chan kind of vibe, where everything just kind of looks wrong and feels wrong. I can't really imagine ever getting comfortable there. Plus it seems like the kind of place the FBI is going to either shut down or take over fairly quickly.

>>247695
>where everything just kind of looks wrong and feels wrong. I can't really imagine ever getting comfortable there.
That's basically all lynxchan sites. I fucking hate the stupid web 3.0 aesthetic that comes with the engine, but faggots keep on choosing it over engines that are tinyboard-derived because they generally have poor installation instructions on their githubs.

>>247559
And it's dead. This is what happens when you tolerate pedos.

I have to admit this place looks interesting. I accidentally got back on the horse ride recently due to how bad and pozzed the show got. The politics are nice too. I used to be active on Twitter mostly before the big shutdowns of 2017. I didn't had much time to lurk here (big mistake, I know), but I wanted to post something.

>>248129
Welcome to the party, pal

>>248137
Thanks! The ride truly never ends.

You guys have a good sense of humor and considering where things have been going, it's greatly appreciated. Oh, and anyone else coming here from /pone/ I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to say goodbye.

Kek, I've been getting into the tales of a Minecraft server steeped in Chan culture (THE OLDEST ANARCHY SERVER IN MINECRAFT) and I happened to see /mlpol/ in the chat (from around 5:16 on):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyHku5duVvw

Granted it was in 2017 but it's always heartening to see nor/mlpol/ice around. Dunno if the faggot still uses this board. Also, there was at least one well-respected player there who made pony map art.

Why canadian faggots hates bronies so much?

>>249072
It is mostly just 1 Canadian faggot, Leaf Goldstein.

Anyone still have a link to MLPOL discord server?

>>249724
Discord is a pox on the internet, luring activity into closed-off faggy circlejerking furry RP chatrooms
There is no official MLPOL discord server and there will never be one.
Discord isn't even good for use when coordinating raids, as Discord's faggot admins love leaking your private info to Antifa.

>>249724
Here we go again
>>250141
Fake news. There is one and most everyone knows it, don't be buttmad because (you) got banned for being insufferable. Having said
>>250084
This nigga gets it

>>250273
Get over yourself. This happened years ago. I wasn't banned, I left after being muted.

>>250289
>Get over yourself
No u

>>250327
Do you really want the users looking at this site for the first time to see us fighting over some petty bullshit that happened years ago? Hasbro is a shit, and it made shit choices(Alicorn, Glimmer, EQG). Let's both get over ourselves on the count of three, alright?
One…
Two…
Three.
Say, what would you like to say to any new users looking at this site for the first time?
Perhaps you could advertise /ub/, our self-improvement board for physical and mental fitness!
Or /vx/, our board for gaming and spooky shit, but mostly gaming.
Or /1ntr/ and /sp/, which are also there!

>>250337
That's a bit rich coming from (you), all things considered. Maybe you could try not mis-characterizing everything you don't like? Maybe if you allowed room for other people to have differing opinions without denigrating them and their positions? This thread went off the rails a long time ago.
>what would you say to any new users
Find and read the policy page, and then lurk moar. This is a board of peace and friendship, but its not the board you're coming from so don't expect special treatment.

>>250367

>Maybe if you allowed room for other people to have differing opinions without denigrating them and their positions?
I probably shouldn't reply to you, but oh well, is this fucking reddit now?

>>250568
And there was i, thinking cal-art ponies couldn't get any worse.

>>250686
If only you knew the irony of that question

>spicscord drama
You two wanna get a room or something?

Just aheads up

>>251086
Have you been in hibernation? They've already come here and although there was some attempt at discussion spergs managed to destroy the thread before anything could come of it.

>>251090
They deserve to have their threads completely ruined tbh. They are disingenuous, compromised fraudsters that will do or say anything to win people over to their slave ideology no matter how they need to twist the truth or misrepresent themselves to suit this purpose. You can't "attempt at [honest] discussion" with people who aren't interested in it to begin with; their sole intent is to separate a few weak-willed, low-information individuals from the herd and win them over through further misinformation until they're just as fanatic about submission to the will of the centrally-planned Discord Tranny soy state as they are.

>>251090
Fuck their thread and fuck them. They didn't come here to participate in our board culture or to have an exchange of ideas, they came here as part of their asinine "outreach" program which basically amounts to trying to propagandize people. They literally admitted in the above screencap that they have been shellacking /pol/ with their bullshit. To be fair there are a lot of groups shellacking /pol/ with bullshit and these guys are basically just pissing in an ocean of piss, but still. They're a part of the problem in more ways than one. Any commie "outreach" shit shows up here again it should be an instant horsepussy thread.

>>251112
this.

>>251086
>>251090

What are you talking about? The leftypol thread was not ruined.

Communism is not welcome on MLPOL and the majority of the community expressed rightfully its explicit dissatisfaction with this thread. This includes staff members of the site who wanted to shut down the thread, but were forbidden to.
I see no reason why we should platform subhumans who want to deplatform and murder us while spreading their mindpoison into our community we only had to make because we were deplatformed elsewhere in the first place
I for one do not associate with /leftypol/ /leftymlpol/, /leftymlp/ or whatever these animals name themselves. for all i care they could be starving on my doorstep and i would not let them in.

>>251090
Sorry, I haven’t been here in a long time and just thought I should warn you guys sorry

>>251112
>>251113
>>251115
Yeah, no. It's not particularly hard to debunk commie myths, but although a few anons were doing so, some glaringly couldn't argue to save their lives and others were actively sabotaging engagement. For the most part more open-minded (read: able to be deconverted) lefties were coming here and were looking for answers, whether they were genuine or not. /leftypol/ calls itself a "bunker" because it insulates itself from truthful ideas (redpills) in favor of fantasy, and an open portal leading them here was always going to be far more threatening to them than to us (particularly as they were limited to one thread). Of course, you didn't see this and the spergs proved the commies right by showing us to be as incompetent, petty and small-minded as they believe us to be.

That you well and truly believe /leftypol/ to be an intellectual threat means you believe /mlpol/ to be starved of discourse, understanding and moral rigor to the point that members may flip-flop if they just so hear a different opinion. As that thread showed, you might actually be right.

>>251182
They aren't an intellectual threat. They are an anti-intellectual threat to the purity of our commie-free bunker.
Communists aren't entitled to a spoon-feeding session by a patient and kind white man willing to spend weeks undoing years of lefty programming.
It is good when this happens, but even the Buddha loses patience when insulted enough (meanwhile Jesus only loses his patience about Jews, suck my cock indian voodoo religion) and commies can't be helped unless they're willing to help themselves.
Perhaps if a new /cc/ Communist Conversion board was made, there would be a place for Communists to have the Jewishness debated out of them away from our far more important discussions.
We could also call it /ask/ or /logos/ or /hp/ for horsepill or something.
I took the idea from how r/the_donald has r/askthe_donald. It ensures TD can be a neverending Trump rally, a feedback loop where Neocons have the cuckishness slowly shamed out of them and rare truly redpilled memes gain 80k upvotes, while AskTD is a place of intellectual debate where the incurable lefties go to embarass themselves and the curables go to ask questions. These things helped attract normies and make them redpilled "enough" so those who considered Trump an extremist in 2016 think he's too soft on the left now.

>>251193
>Communists aren't entitled to a spoon-feeding session by a patient and kind white man willing to spend weeks undoing years of lefty programming.
I and some others don't think of this as a chore, actually. Rather, deprogramming progressivism and other ideological maladies can be enjoying so long as you approach it from different angles. I like to wade into Youtube comment sections, even ones on lefty videos, and battle various false assumptions. Like with anything else, you recognize patterns and become better at it and therefore capable of doing more good in the world. That's what was so great about /pol/, because it was a continuous open-ended discussion about anything without the group pressure of most forums (or Reddit); it threw together a mishmash of different people and everyone grew from it. /mlpol/ is sadly lacking that nowadays as there's minimal earnest discussion and in-depth threads are scarce (I ought to contribute more but real-life responsibilities need to be completed first). As a result it feels more like a bubble whereas two years ago there was lots of discussion.

>It is good when this happens, but even the Buddha loses patience when insulted enough
From my own observation it was our own side doing most of the insulting.

>Perhaps if a new /cc/ Communist Conversion board was made, there would be a place for Communists to have the Jewishness debated out of them away from our far more important discussions.
>We could also call it /ask/ or /logos/ or /hp/ for horsepill or something.
I'd like that, except the problem is we don't get a lot of outside influx that makes it worthwhile and it would be a dead board. Our best chance was that thread but it's gone now.

Perhaps the best of both worlds, wanting more engagement and removing communists, would be to do some outreach of our own.

The communist thread was in no way a bad thing on its own as it was something to mix things up. Let’s be honest, a communist doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell here. Between anons with shill sensors going off and ready to strike any form of kikery, and anons with great argumentative skills and the experience of having been reformed from communism itself, we can easily contain any threat that comes our way. However, we do need some engagement of even hostile nature to keep ourselves invested in participating instead of lurking all the time. If anything gets out of control, our mods will handle it.

The communist thread was very tame from what I expected. Some anons protested its existence, but you know what? That’s fine. If the communists couldn’t take a few pictures mocking OP, then they weren’t exactly the most invested in actual debate with us. They said several times in the thread that they really had no interest in us but were spreading their message. They gave up not because we did anything to them, but because they didn’t see weakness in anyone that engaged with them.

We probably should take the next step and begin some small outreach to engage with more people. At least that’s how I feel. This place having one communist thread isn’t going to hurt the overall site quality, especially how easily they were defeated. It just goes to show that we can handle whatever comes our way.

>>251214
They aren't foolish enough to let us reach out to them, they simply take advantage of the fact people like us allow the reverse. I've experienced this multiple times myself, as has a close associate of mine-as has likely anyone that's gone over to any one of their enclaves with the earnest desire to argue in good faith with them: they will ban you before long, no matter how "nice" and diplomatic you think you're being. When you get right down to it on some level they probably know that what they've invested so much time, effort and emotion into doesn't hold up to scrutiny, so what happens is libertarians and "state-capitalists" (which includes everything from paleocons to self-professed NATSOCS) allow them to form ideological bulkheads in their own territory, ceding ground in the Info Wars while being strategically denied any kind of measured response.

I'm not telling mlpol how to run its site mind you, I only came here recently-and pretty much just to ask the staff here to help me with my own site-but personally I would exercise caution when it comes to engaging with communists because there's no amount of information they're willing to disregard or time of yours they're willing to waste in their conversion efforts. If you debate with them, just keep in mind you're debating for the audience's sake, not theirs. You'll see them saying the same shit tomorrow or even within hours, this is why it's preferable to engage them on a more open forum.

>>251221
A Paleocon? What's that, a TradCon only Digivolved?
Redpill me on Paleocons, are they faggots?

>>251221
Point taken. However, my idea of an outreach is not towards communists as they will come to us to ree as they will, and we will counter them on arrival, whether the correct approach is debate or driving them away, depending on the situation. I think we should focus efforts towards people disillusioned with the current state of the world and are more open to at least checking us out. There is a growing popularity towards more right wing entertainment and doing a little fishing on services such as bitchute might be worth trying. What do you think?

>>251238
paleocons are generally fiscally conservative, moderate socially, heavily capitalistic, and rather libertarian governmentally. specific interest in antiglobalism and isolationism. Pat Buchanan is a great example of a paleocon.

>>251238
Right-wing conservatives who actually value nationalism and traditionalism and oppose neocon warmongering and globalhomo degeneracy. Pat Buchanan and Paul (((Gottfried))) (based) are two of the biggest paleocon names I can think of. I think Robert A Taft is popular with them too. They also generally get along with right-libertarians like Ron Paul, although they tend to differ on trade.

>>251238

Basically what >>251253 and >>251251 said

A paleocon is a little more pragmatic about the use of the state to guide economic matters than a libertarian is, this intervention is primarily-if not exclusively-reserved for our arrangements with foreign governments (tit-for-tat tariffs, subsidies, counter-subsidies and/or other measures as deemed appropriate reacting to both market realities and hostilities). At the same time, they put a bit less emphasis on the "esoteric" than tradcons do. Paleocons were the people that lost the Republican party to the now discredited (((neocon))) shills, the RINO Republicans who'd paid lip service to smaller federal government, strong borders, limited migration and non-interventionist foreign policy-while simultaneously allotting 8 trillion dollars for endless forever-wars to protect oil bound for state-owned energy firms across Eurasia, subsidizing the employers of illegal immigrants and doing nothing to stop the unchecked rise in college tuition rates facilitated by the federal government.

Look up "Patrick James Buchanan" if you're not familiar, he's probably the most famous example of a sincere American paleocon.

>>251182

>'intellectual threat'

I've been arguing with these kinds of people since /pol/ was called /new/, close to a decade. I've never felt threatened by them in the slightest. In contrast, starting from the very moment 8ddit provided them with their own platform they were always the ones banning me and anyone else that stepped out of the lines they had painstakingly drawn up. They know that they have everything to lose and little to gain by letting genuine opposition interact freely with their community. Allowing even a small number of strong contrarians post freely means their best "true believer" rhetoricians (basically the nastiest, most rat-like and intellectually dishonest among them) are wasted being put on a largely futile defense and it's their stray grugs who are the only ones left with enough time on their hands to wander away and play missionary, which ultimately leads to them getting dabbed on relentlessly and wololo'd within a week. The only reason any of the very few people among them with a triple digit IQ will ever be found astray from the safety of their home boards to begin with is to play the numbers game. They're here to take advantage of the opportunities they themselves would deny any one of us for any reason were they in charge and they do that because they rightly know that we'd be hypocrites to stop them. It's the same way they completely took over the higher education system over the past 50 years with predictable results (https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/6/liberal-professors-outnumber-conservatives-12-1/)

I'm not suggesting any particular policy against them-I certainly don't have any on my website-but I'm putting them in the context I feel they deserve after dealing with them for as long as I have. Yes, they absolutely deserve to be met with a veritable horsepussy storm of the century every time they rear their ugly heads openly, but as fun as such childish antics are it doesn't really do much but help them drum up sympathy for themselves, both through pretending they came here for a sincere dialog to begin with as well as further pretending they then feel oppressed when they don't get it. Ultimately civil discourse really is the only route to a moral victory, but "thanks, I hate it" and I hope now you at least understand why.

>an open portal leading them here was always going to be far more threatening to them than to us

Agreed in principle

>>251244
A woman I know has a 7 year old son who spends his time modding Minecraft for the Xbox. He uses youtube tutorials to help him sometimes, but he's memorized most of the necessary shit and he's made one shockingly beautiful Minecraft House. Future architect right here. I've seen better on youtube made by adults, but this is modless and made by a literal child. For Christmas, he wants a PC with Minecraft because it has better mods and will allow him to make his own ones.
For christmas I'm going to give the kid a USB full of books and guides on real coding and how to use Game Maker. You're never too old to learn to code, after all.
Anyway, there are some smart kids out there and they're being betrayed by their Boomer parents and Socialist schools. Left adrift with no real value system or goals that seem possible.
Maybe spreading subtly redpilled memes/videos in the minecraft community would help? Minecraft is an all-ages product loved by many kids and adults who look down on Fortnite. Plus that community already loves Pewdiepie, who's been slandered by the media many times.
Making videos on Bitchute is the best option, but being a redpilled voice in Minecraft communities would be an excellent side benefit to the future.

>>251301
>how to use Game Maker
That's all well and good, but if he's really a future architect I think books on that would be better suited. Not everyone's cut out for coding (I tried it before switching to economics and never looked back), and architecture is a discipline that will always be in demand and probably not as cutthroat as coding.

>Left adrift with no real value system or goals that seem possible.
Hence why being homeschooled with a Christian program is the best possible thing, but unfortunately homeschooling is heavily restricted in Europe.

>Maybe spreading subtly redpilled memes/videos in the minecraft community would help?
Not a bad idea, and the MC community is already fairly impervious to bluepilling due to the game cultivating a positive culture. I'd like to mention that 2b2t is a server originally from /v/ and celebrates maintaining its culture while becoming increasingly popular.

>>251238
here's a paleocon writer and thinker Thomas Fleming discussing it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPvVamEno1M

this is Fleming discussing it in 2019
https://fleming.foundation/2019/10/paleoconservatism-part-six-three-cheers-for-free-markets-zero-for-capitalism

>>251305
I never read anything on Architecture, all I know is old shit made by Whites looks good and Brutalism and Modernism are for faggots. What books would be good redpills for me and him? I should probably stay on the safe side with books I give him(slightly edgy ones would be fine mixed in with safe ones), but I can handle all the redpills.

>>251486
Well, all I know is that E. Michael Jones has a good book on architecture, but that's too heavy reading and probably not appropriate for that age. Get a glossy picture book showing different architectural styles from Gothic to Neoclassical. I'd recommend something that has cutaways and cross-sections, because that was the sort of thing I read when I was seven.

i wasn't sure where to post this but it's an interesting lecture by a cuckservative from the Heritage Foundation. it's about American Balkanization being an "unintended" consequence of Civil Rights Act, while simultaneously praising it. it's a little boring however quite revealing about the racial caste system in the US.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkMkTQnurgQ

Trump to his credit seem to be letting it die on the vine
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/civil-rights-commission-critical-of-agency-efforts-under-trump

>>251494
I know of Michael but do you know of any other christian authors that also are redpilled essentially.
Even recomandations made by somewhat bluepilled christians that you find intresting would be nice. I mean if you have someone, you wouldn't call redpilled but still intresting to read for other reasons. That would nice.

>>251720
I'd recommend GK Chesterton. He was an English Catholic who wrote his works after WWI. Already, a lot of the cancer we have to deal with today was taking root in academia, and Chesterton shat on all of it with great wit. He never specifically names the jew, but he does casually drop the nigger-word a few times, and more importantly he offers some good criticisms of both (((capitalism))) and (((socialism))). I would start with What's Wrong With the World, then Heretics, then Orthodoxy, then The Ball and Cross.

>>251967
Thanks, a lot man.

>>251720
Jean Raspail, well-known for The Camp of the Saints, is a traditional Catholic. I was pleasantly surprised to find out he's still alive.
Tom Woods, probably one of the most popular real libertarians out there, is an ardent Catholic and has written a book called "The Church and the Market."
Jörg Guido Hülsmann has written about how fiat inflation creates a materialistic society.
Gary North is a Christian economist I recommend heavily.
Vox Day wrote a book called "The Irrational Atheist" which I can share if you ask nicely.

>>252260
I'd recommend the book "The Plot Against the Church" by Maurice Pinay.

>>174798
mlpol good