Previous bread is lagging my browser so I bakeded; Deal.
>Game threadThis is number 10. If you've looked at /vx/ for more than a minute, you've probably noticed a trend.
Previous:
https://mlpol.net/vx/res/5695.html#6373587 replies and 71 files omitted.
>>6805Also, what's the other half of her?
>>6660Also, following on non-weapon character items. I'd just like to clarify that Tracy only came into the game with her dog-collar and ambiguous "knife collection" (I was hoping to pass that off as a quiver of efficiency, if possible)
>>6805Drink it pretty much, its not really an effective poison, I'm just using it as a catalyst for you to go all ghost rider.
>>6806Gray dwarf/grey elf
>>6807Thats fine. Thez has one too.
>>6808Is there anything else I should know, meta-wise, if I want to go towards the ghost rider path? I want to creep towards it whilst staying in character.
I was thinking it would be just like having an Alternate Form Nightmare shape, with a couple Balor-like traits.
I'm also trying to attain the Paladin's Mount class.>>6807Does my cutie mark count as a character-item? I noticed that brands/tattoos appear to have effects in some versions.
>>6809It won't be an immediate <boom she's ghost-rider> and it'll simply be replacing character traits as she goes along.
You're serious about this? You realize he has to WANT to have you as a mount for it to happen,... also you'll need to be bigger for it to work. I'll put thought into it though.
Another good question, and another thing Thez has (indicating familiarity with the concept). If it does, I don't know that she would necessarily be aware of it, but why not?
>>6808I just think of Thez as the snake lady. Some sort of evil remnant of something older that God allows to live because of her utility in a greater purpose
>>6811Thats fitting, as a paladin you can tell (not just on sight) that she IS evil, but though she's evil she tends to kill evil things because they don't know how to act.
>>6810>You're serious about this?Tracy came into this game with one motive: she'll be on this Ride donec mors nos separaverit.
>>6812>she tends to kill evil things because they don't know how to act.So by that, you mean she's Lawful Evil, like most Pit Fiends?
>>6814Yep, though she follows the laws of power, not that of man or beast.
>>6815Can I get a redpill on alignments? How relevant are they in this game?
>>6816Normally, they're essential qualifiers that can have serious experience and roleplaying consequences for acting outside of. For example, Trump should have had negative experience for kiking the kikes that one time, but I find such rigidity to detract from gameplay.
Lawful means orderly/structured, Chaos being antithetical
Good means community-socially behavioral, evil being more individual/selfish. Neutral is always the gray area.
It also determines what cleric/mage spells are available to a player, as well as what they're weak/susceptible to, and certain items are alignment specific.
>>6817>I find such rigidity to detract from gameplay.This. I say we'd best mostly ignore it, except for instances of meme-tier consensus. Setting in stone differences between good and evil would just generate bullshit on a politics board.
>>6817>killing the likes that one timeTrumpaladin pushed one out of a window, and I guess directed Tourcil to do things, but otherwise intentionally avoided harming the rats. If they are an ally - the greatest ally - of the greatest nation, how can it be acceptable to harm them?
>>6820I said 'kiking' not 'killing'. I'm talking about the check-fraud
>>6819>ignoring good and evilEvil is for killing, good is for protecting
>>6821Um... Yeah... (I swear that had at least a 50% chance of being real money though)
>>6819The only real consideration is things like circles of protection axiomatic spells (blasphemy, Football, etc.). Since infernius is chaotic, he's immune to the word of chaos, but is weak against the Law. Thez is weak against Football (if the user is powerful enough) but immune to Blasphemy, etc.
>>6822Fair point; we all pretty much understand the difference. I was mostly referring to political areas: those shouldn't have that drastic affects on stats, unless the message is clear.
>>6824Where do truncated icosahedrons fall on that scale? Lawful Evil, I assume? >>6826Symmetrical polygons are lawful, no good/evil
>>6828Oh that. Yes, lawful evil
>>6827If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, that's evil, and must be exterminated
Are we going to play today or tomorrow?
Planning on today if everyone is available, but tomorrow is the "official". I may get distracted by bovie-knide, but I've got enough shit to throw at you include
So I know Tracy is here, having just engaged in virtual divegrass after curiously (almost freudian) asking about, what was it, truncated,... god dammit,... icosahedrons. Trump is also likely here. That leaves IT, being Infernius and Torcuil,... unless.
>>6766>in the tulpa threadI believe my sides are passing neptune as we speak
>>6777Fug u
>>6836... nothing. Seriously though, thanks for the mention, I hadn't looked into that thread/archive since it happened, and it was most magical (both times)
>>6837>was>implying the ride ever endsIt's still up:
>>114 →Also, just in case Infernius's faggot doesn't show up, is he in the stables where I am?
>>6837I didn't realize mlpol had a tulpa thread
I thought you meant one on mlp
>reads >>6838Not the thread I was talking about, I was talking about
https://archive.4plebs.org/mlpol/thread/174328/ >>6840>closes threadI would like to keep waat little sanity I still have thanks
>>6843That's not ALWAYS what happens, for me its special circumstances. Though, I imagine you interpret that thread differently than I do.
>looking @ the archive for the first time since it habbened, having spent 6 mos bathing in hoers n pussy
FFS fam, I'm lit. crying. Hiro will pay in blood.
>>6844Nah, I saw the bitch that had it go wayyyyyy to far
TL;DR he had the whole mane6 "raping him">>6845Whose ready to binge?
>>6844>>6843They say it can be pretty dangerous to have one, let alone several.
I remember a greentext about one fool who got so greedy he let his tulpas outnumber him: they conspired against him, and brutally >raped him.
>>6847Depending on the individual, I could agree. If we're gauging 'a particular set of posts' I would say that 'they' have had time to determine differing circumstances. Is this rly the thread for this?
"Shut up, the only thing you've blown up is the faggot."
Tl:dr I can state w/ certainty that I only have and have ever had is Thez, the other is something else
inb4 what did he mean by this? So where's everyone at? Last chance
>>6851im in lennoses room still.
>>6851I am dead
Totally not posting, just dead
>characterTrying to figure out how to enchant