/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>6579
>it seems by your candor that I need to refine my estimates.
What exactly did you mean by this?

>>6582
what did he mean by this
> it seems by your candor that I need to refine my estimates.

>>6583
>>6588
Maybe I'm missing irony or sarcasm in your posts, but the meaning is pretty clear. GM was planning on having more sessions, or perhaps very late at night, and was surprised to find that in post 6578 o.tb ("Tracy") very bluntly stated "please don't [have a session tonight], I need sleep." This is surprising not so much because of what is actually said, but because the wording is blunt, whereas we'd expect the normal desire to be polite to people we don't really know to soften any requests not to have a session that night. It means o.tb/Tracy was more unwilling to proceed with a late night session than GM had anticipated; even though he was not planning a session that night, he must have thought general willingness was higher. Now he must consider whether midweek sessions are too burdensome. I think it's also worth note that GM's reply is somewhat cryptic. To me, that suggests that GM intentionally obfuscated his message by use of overly formal diction, probably because he thought his post would be accusing Tracy of being rude, which is unpleasant.

>>6589
tl;dr GM was planning on having other midweek sessions, Tracy said not just no but hell no, and GM was made to rethink session times because of how blunt Tracy was.

>>6589
>>6590
I will rise to any challenge, should the need come. The wording was only short and blunt blunt because I was lazily mobilefagging with one hand after already having tucked myself in, under the impression that there probably wasn't going to be a session that night (I just thought that it would've started half an hour ago if it were going to happen, although I guess I just didn't want to be caught by surpriseand find out my character had been >raped to death by the fucking unicorn...)

>>6593
I apologize if I sounded selfish there. I didn't think there was a game planned, but I would not have objected to going on anyway.

Whoa, there's been a misunderstanding. I'll fill you in in a bit, but I'm on a schedule. No offense was taken, nor intended

>>6596
>I cannot into human communication
I tried

>>6596
Ah, that's a relief.

>>6597
>>6598
Don't sweat it. I was not intending to run a game last night at all.

The irritated anonfilly was cuz I thought I was smarter than I actually am, and made a miscalculation about the situation I was responding to. Basically I thought someone was playing a joke on me, and that Tracy's faggot might be involved. I apologize.

>>6375
>Previous bread is lagging my browser
When this happens, I usually just click the "Last 50 Posts" button, and that takes care of it.

We didn't have anything planned tonight though, right?

>>6600
I would love to play tonight if he did.

>>6601
I could do it too, if that's what's convenient.

Uh, kinda busy desu

>>6603
That's fine.

GM I have to ask the real questions here...

Who is which nut?

>>6605
How would we decide such things?

>>6606
Idk
Class?
Whether or not the character is a homicidal pony?
Whether or not a character is the poster child for an energy drink?
inb4 bad "left nut" joke

>>6607
Which nut represents what though?

>is confused
>>6605
U mean namefagging?
>I have no name Xp
Wut do you want to call me? I could make suggestions, but one doesn't name themselves on anon-boards.
As for the others, I have a fair guess of who's-who, but there's one or two I'm unsure of at this point. Just sayin'

>>6609
>one doesn't name themselves on anon-boards
I name me

(Staff Edit) I TAKE YOUR DUBS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5d9BrLN5K4
\r

>>6612
Refresh your browser

>>6609
>thread is called mixed nuts
>>6608
Idk, do I look like fucking Einstien?
>>6611
>distant foog noises

>>6611
U can has milkshake ;_;
>cucked

Let the record show that the GET was returned to His Denver Broncos.
Praise be to the Broncos
\r

>>6616
>Almonds, Cashews, Macadamias, Hazels, Pistachios, Walnuts
who out of our party is which type of nut.

>>6616
To His glory, and His Denver Broncos. Have I told you of the Denver Broncos? Let me tell you of Him, and indeed His Denver Broncos. Once, there was not Glory unto Him, without which the Denver Broncos were indeed (indeed!) in woe. Their woe was that there were those - Still! - And in spite of Him - that Football should reign.
This could not be permitted, nor abided. Whence-forth came the man who is and would be known alwasys and Frever as Football
and forever as John Elway, and unto him were granted Footballs. Not the footballs of the mind and soccer, but the one TRUE Football which upon His name did rest.
With great diligence and fortitude did He sign that Footballl to be passed effortlessly unto those fans in whomn dwelt that/(those) Footballs. And so he did smile upon Football, for neither was it offsides, nor participated in/with Eli Manning, who is a fag.
>tfw I wrote this before sleep but never posted.

>>6621
Praise Football. Praise American.

Btw, GM, congrats on mastering the game this well so far. It's been really creative, original and fun, and the allusions were great. Casting Soros as a Balor and making him get all cocky after Rockefeller disappeared was a great touch, and the suggestion that "Lady Glimmer" had multiple levels to herself in the Abyss (even in the Abyss, Glimmerniggers still spam their horseshit) was funny in a spooky way.
I'm looking forward to the next play. It's been fun.

>>6623
Agreed
Props to you GM
and I guess all you other faggots who have stuck around this long

>>6624
>>6623
>>6622
i know you faggots are new to this, this might help you out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhkYSLOMmTs&list=PLUd6XtD1PA7Yf-FSzj79MQmxXabhX_9Tb

>>6622
>>6623
>>6624
>>6626
>>6631
D'awww,.... This has been orders of magnitude more enjoyable, gratifying, and successful than I ever imagined. At first I was skeptical it would even work over an anonboard, and its all thanks to you guys.
\r

>>6631
MY BAD! Can I get a mod edit?
also, which one are you?

>>6633
Modified now to link to post >>6631, which clearly was made after >>6630, so now the post paradoxically links to a post made after it was.
>which one are you
I'm a keep that a secret

>>6634
I KNOW

If that's Lee, you got some splainin' ta do.

>>6636
its not lee.

>>6638
i know,nony

>>6636
>>6635
>>6638
I'm'a never tell

>>6641
Reeee! It's because I'm on a phone.