A purity spiral trend on the right has been emerging for a while now but it has only gotten worse in recent years. Disbelief in the whackiest conspiracy is taken as a sign of disloyalty and anything other then the most retarded take makes you a shill. Examples include:
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
>you think the pharmaceutical companies are greedy assholes who pray on the despairation of sick people?
>Well I think everything the pharmaceutical companies sell is poison and I'm taking wormwood extract to cure my cancer, you cuck!
>you think mega companies moved jobs overseas because the CEOs are amoral pieces of shit who care more about money than the future of their country?
>Well I think its all part of a plan to weaken the West and install communism, FED!
>you are worried about 5G because you think it will greatly enhance digital surveillance?
>well I think 5G will cause cancer and mass death, fag!
>you think the covid vaccine was bad because lockdowns were used as an excuse to attack political enemies and side effects were ultimately worse than the disease?
>well I think its all a part of the NWO depopulation agenda, pharmakike!
>you are worried about AI because of job loss, propaganda bots, and surveillance concerns?
>well I think AI is actually a demonic force in computer form, fag!
>you hate Hollywood movies because they are controlled by a few studios who push stale liberal trash?
>well I think Hollywood is putting secret symbols and predictive programming in their films to control the population, tranny!
Ect
It isn't enough to distrust the failing institutions, you need to believe they are part of a satanic plot as well. This has only gotten worse over time and I suspect it will only continue get worse over time. Is there any way this can be stopped before it collapses under the weight of its own bullshit into a flat earth singularity?
And I know many of you will claim that some of the crazier claims are pushed by bad actors, and you are probably right to some extent, but silly shit like germ theory denial and flat earth are becoming more common especially on the right. Is there a way to stop this?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
1748184081.jpg (62.5 KB, 612x612, 445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg)
786 replies and 161 files omitted.
>it IS Boom Boom
Dammit, I'm too good at this. Please disregard Batman as he takes a victory lap
Dammit, I'm too good at this. Please disregard Batman as he takes a victory lap
It's funny how the boomer always outs himself by juxtaposing his abhorrent takes with his abysmal-quality Facebook memes.
>>391193
>appropriate the Nigel-cycle meme for BoomBoom
I know that's not what you posted, but somehow that's what I read
>appropriate the Nigel-cycle meme for BoomBoom
I know that's not what you posted, but somehow that's what I read
>>391193
The most obvious way he outs himself is accusing others of derailing or deflecting when they point out it is. Why shouldn't they point it out? He made it obvious a long time ago he has no interest in honest discussions.
The most obvious way he outs himself is accusing others of derailing or deflecting when they point out it is. Why shouldn't they point it out? He made it obvious a long time ago he has no interest in honest discussions.
I think allot of the hyper extreme conspiracy theories are mostly false flags made by commies, troons, and glowies, augmented by true believing useful idiots. its very easy to de-legitimize a political movement if you can cause the conversation to be hyper centralized on the schizophrenic, retarded excesses. even having to talk about shit like "5g" and "satanism" as a someone in the right wing is effectively a win for leftists.
Think of like like being caked in shit. it doesn't matter if you explain that someone caked you in it so you should really be upset at them, or you rolled around in it yourself. you still smell like shit, people are going to want you to go away.
The only way to really beat it is to force the left to talk about their own excesses instead, lol. if you can keep them addressing the "transing the kids" issue, while playing clips of delusional leftist tik tok cretins screaming about it, you can make their normies leave.
Think of like like being caked in shit. it doesn't matter if you explain that someone caked you in it so you should really be upset at them, or you rolled around in it yourself. you still smell like shit, people are going to want you to go away.
The only way to really beat it is to force the left to talk about their own excesses instead, lol. if you can keep them addressing the "transing the kids" issue, while playing clips of delusional leftist tik tok cretins screaming about it, you can make their normies leave.
Come back Boom Boom. I want to witness what other facets of your schizophrenic swiss cheese of a brain you got.
>>391198
I think you are right that it is pushed by feds, but many of the people pushing it are grifters trying to make money off of bullshit like crystal healing and even more are just schizos/retards who fell for it and those people need to be shunned the same way we shun other mentally ill freaks like troons.
I think you are right that it is pushed by feds, but many of the people pushing it are grifters trying to make money off of bullshit like crystal healing and even more are just schizos/retards who fell for it and those people need to be shunned the same way we shun other mentally ill freaks like troons.
>>391200
If you want him to be gone for good simply make banners mocking flat earth or baby eating cabals. He'll have a melt down every time he visits.
If you want him to be gone for good simply make banners mocking flat earth or baby eating cabals. He'll have a melt down every time he visits.
>>391206
Who wants him gone? Do you know where we are? It's ALWAYS fun when old frens stop by to visit!
Who wants him gone? Do you know where we are? It's ALWAYS fun when old frens stop by to visit!
>>391207
The dude contributes to an attitude of paranoia and tries to shut down discussion. That shit almost killed the site in the past. We should encourage users who will have real discussions not people who will shut discussion down.
The dude contributes to an attitude of paranoia and tries to shut down discussion. That shit almost killed the site in the past. We should encourage users who will have real discussions not people who will shut discussion down.
>>391208
No, your inability to not read through posts contributes to an attitude of paranoia. If I can tell weeks out that it's Boom Boom WITHOUT staff privileges, AND he's "a problem" then he wasn't my problem to fix.
I agree, BoomBoom can be obnoxious as shit, but no one is allowed to abdicate their own reason and critical analysis
No, your inability to not read through posts contributes to an attitude of paranoia. If I can tell weeks out that it's Boom Boom WITHOUT staff privileges, AND he's "a problem" then he wasn't my problem to fix.
I agree, BoomBoom can be obnoxious as shit, but no one is allowed to abdicate their own reason and critical analysis
>>391154
>Your aim is to make anons waste time and effort to prove to you what you refused to see for many years.
Actually, my aim is just to have Anon clarify wtf he's talking about, as opposed to just making vague blanket statements about the truth being out there, and how everyone who disagrees with him on the internet is automatically ZOG. I thought my post made that clear enough, but maybe I was wrong.
>If you are really interested in the covid psy-op, /mlpol/ archive has plenty of documented info in thousands of posts, documents, testimonies, and of course facts.
More evasion. All I did was ask a very simple question. Anon claims that:
>covid-19 was the common flu relabeled. The virus genotype (molecular sequence) was just a computer simulation, yup, because the virus was never isolated, then to concoct a "vaccine" the hoaxers used the simulation to get a recipe.
Bear in mind that I am not even trying to argue that he's wrong about any of this; all I'm doing is asking him to furnish proof. Anon does not elaborate on how he reached any of these conclusions, nor does he offer links to any sources that would corroborate his claims. Now, I have (You) essentially telling me to waste hours of my life trawling through hundreds of thousands of posts in the archive, most of which have nothing to do with the question I'm asking, in the hopes that eventually I will stumble across something resembling an answer. Obviously I'm not going to do this. If the claims Anon is making really are established, verified facts, then there ought to be an abundance of information readily available that will prove it. I feel like it shouldn't be that hard for someone as knowledgeable as yourself to point a poor, uninformed nitwit like myself in the right direction. Why are you being so evasive?
>>391181
>Fraudshi ordered bats to be infected in secret US built and funded labs throughout chinkland to find out which would act as carriers without dying.
>hundreds of US-chink biowarfare labs in Ukraine were seized by Russia
>the CIA controls >99% of """news""" in the US
Naturally. I'm sure any reasonable person would agree that all of this is perfectly self-evident, and thus requires no proof or corroboration. You sound like a perfectly sane person whose words can be taken at face value.
*sigh*. I'm going to restate my original complaint, because I feel like this is relevant to both of the posters I've responded to:
>The kind of person who is drawn to the screwiest aspects of a conspiracy theory tends paradoxically to be both skeptical and gullible. He distrusts all authority and categorically rejects anything coming from an "official" source, but will accept sketchy theories from the internet without a shred of proof. This kind of person is not so much driven by a quest for truth or even an interest in politics, it's just an ego-driven desire to see themselves as privy to secret knowledge that the normies can't grasp. That this kind of person is actually much, much dumber and far easier to dupe than the average normie is a fact that is usually lost on them.
[Read more] >Your aim is to make anons waste time and effort to prove to you what you refused to see for many years.
Actually, my aim is just to have Anon clarify wtf he's talking about, as opposed to just making vague blanket statements about the truth being out there, and how everyone who disagrees with him on the internet is automatically ZOG. I thought my post made that clear enough, but maybe I was wrong.
>If you are really interested in the covid psy-op, /mlpol/ archive has plenty of documented info in thousands of posts, documents, testimonies, and of course facts.
More evasion. All I did was ask a very simple question. Anon claims that:
>covid-19 was the common flu relabeled. The virus genotype (molecular sequence) was just a computer simulation, yup, because the virus was never isolated, then to concoct a "vaccine" the hoaxers used the simulation to get a recipe.
Bear in mind that I am not even trying to argue that he's wrong about any of this; all I'm doing is asking him to furnish proof. Anon does not elaborate on how he reached any of these conclusions, nor does he offer links to any sources that would corroborate his claims. Now, I have (You) essentially telling me to waste hours of my life trawling through hundreds of thousands of posts in the archive, most of which have nothing to do with the question I'm asking, in the hopes that eventually I will stumble across something resembling an answer. Obviously I'm not going to do this. If the claims Anon is making really are established, verified facts, then there ought to be an abundance of information readily available that will prove it. I feel like it shouldn't be that hard for someone as knowledgeable as yourself to point a poor, uninformed nitwit like myself in the right direction. Why are you being so evasive?
>>391181
>Fraudshi ordered bats to be infected in secret US built and funded labs throughout chinkland to find out which would act as carriers without dying.
>hundreds of US-chink biowarfare labs in Ukraine were seized by Russia
>the CIA controls >99% of """news""" in the US
Naturally. I'm sure any reasonable person would agree that all of this is perfectly self-evident, and thus requires no proof or corroboration. You sound like a perfectly sane person whose words can be taken at face value.
*sigh*. I'm going to restate my original complaint, because I feel like this is relevant to both of the posters I've responded to:
>The kind of person who is drawn to the screwiest aspects of a conspiracy theory tends paradoxically to be both skeptical and gullible. He distrusts all authority and categorically rejects anything coming from an "official" source, but will accept sketchy theories from the internet without a shred of proof. This kind of person is not so much driven by a quest for truth or even an interest in politics, it's just an ego-driven desire to see themselves as privy to secret knowledge that the normies can't grasp. That this kind of person is actually much, much dumber and far easier to dupe than the average normie is a fact that is usually lost on them.
>>391224
>Anon does not elaborate on how he reached any of these conclusions, nor does he offer links to any sources that would corroborate his claims.
As you can imagine, I won't research again just to satisfy you with links. I did the digging and covid is bogus.
>Anon does not elaborate on how he reached any of these conclusions, nor does he offer links to any sources that would corroborate his claims.
As you can imagine, I won't research again just to satisfy you with links. I did the digging and covid is bogus.
>>391224
>He distrusts all authority and categorically rejects anything coming from an "official" source,
And why that would be? Only a very special kind of idiot would believe the same liar, not once, not twice, not thrice, but uncounted times.
>He distrusts all authority and categorically rejects anything coming from an "official" source,
And why that would be? Only a very special kind of idiot would believe the same liar, not once, not twice, not thrice, but uncounted times.
>>391224
Great job exposing your indoctrination AND showing pure, unfiltered sheeple's ignorance! You jumped through all those hoops simply to say "n-n-no U!!!!"? Wow.
Any one REALLY want to see how the start of realpolitik puritan spiraling is going? Let us start with Texas:
[YouTube] BREAKING: The Most OUTLANDISH Political Law EVER in 105 Years![]()
Eat your words. Immediately.
Great job exposing your indoctrination AND showing pure, unfiltered sheeple's ignorance! You jumped through all those hoops simply to say "n-n-no U!!!!"? Wow.
Any one REALLY want to see how the start of realpolitik puritan spiraling is going? Let us start with Texas:
[YouTube] BREAKING: The Most OUTLANDISH Political Law EVER in 105 Years
Eat your words. Immediately.
>>391226
I can understand not trusting authority but why trust sole random blog or social media users?
I can understand not trusting authority but why trust sole random blog or social media users?
1748607837.jpg (334.1 KB, 1258x720, Pinkie_Pie_suspicious_again.jpg)
>>391233
>again aiming to the interlocutor's character instead of the facts
Let us flip the mirror and answer why you trust or even listen to liars and evil doers. Or you suffer from a severe case of Stockholm Syndrome, or your cognitive abilities are gravely impaired, or you are getting paid. Which one is it?
>again aiming to the interlocutor's character instead of the facts
Let us flip the mirror and answer why you trust or even listen to liars and evil doers. Or you suffer from a severe case of Stockholm Syndrome, or your cognitive abilities are gravely impaired, or you are getting paid. Which one is it?
>>391233
>>391234
Show of hands, who trusts ANY source at face value? Being 'distrustful' of a source WITHOUT your OWN due diligence is as retarded as expecting your opposition to vet their own sources to 'your precious' satisfaction. Want a source vetted? Do it your fucking self, or stand there with your dickin hand looking at Facebook 'political' memes
>>391234
Show of hands, who trusts ANY source at face value? Being 'distrustful' of a source WITHOUT your OWN due diligence is as retarded as expecting your opposition to vet their own sources to 'your precious' satisfaction. Want a source vetted? Do it your fucking self, or stand there with your dickin hand looking at Facebook 'political' memes
>>391237
NTA, but you havent displayed any justification for having your question answered.
Who thinks "You have to justify your ideas and opinions to me"? If your attitude isn't "let me see for myself", then kindly lurk moar
NTA, but you havent displayed any justification for having your question answered.
Who thinks "You have to justify your ideas and opinions to me"? If your attitude isn't "let me see for myself", then kindly lurk moar
>>391238
It wasn't even my question. I'm just appalled by your horrible etiquette that lowers the quality of the entire site.
Converse like a normal person.
It wasn't even my question. I'm just appalled by your horrible etiquette that lowers the quality of the entire site.
Converse like a normal person.
>>391240
The user assumes a certain onus when approaching information. If you want to understand something, you're better off investigating the topic yourself, so that if you have unanswered questions you can present them in discussion, rather than expecting a spoon-feeding.
The user assumes a certain onus when approaching information. If you want to understand something, you're better off investigating the topic yourself, so that if you have unanswered questions you can present them in discussion, rather than expecting a spoon-feeding.
>391241
You have completely missed the point.
They're not asking to be "spoon-fed", they are asking (You) how (You) came to your own conclusion.
When you make a statement, people are going to ask you to support that statement, and refute it with their own. That's how civilized arguments work.
You have completely missed the point.
They're not asking to be "spoon-fed", they are asking (You) how (You) came to your own conclusion.
When you make a statement, people are going to ask you to support that statement, and refute it with their own. That's how civilized arguments work.
I lost all respect for faggot OP's intelligence the moment he supported his "vibes felt on a bender"-ass musings with fucking 4chan.
There are no words to describe my increduity. Just LOL.
There are no words to describe my increduity. Just LOL.
>>391242
No, you have missed the point that other poster is actually going to provide. NTA, but I couldn't be arsed to even find the source material that goes into all kinds of otherwise well-known shit, including covid, or building 7, or any number of additional cases of otherwise "unproven" (but proven) shenanigens and government actions. Maybe it's cuz when covid was happening, all the info-dumps here were not obfuscated, slid, derailed, etc. like on /pol/, but that shit is old news
No, you have missed the point that other poster is actually going to provide. NTA, but I couldn't be arsed to even find the source material that goes into all kinds of otherwise well-known shit, including covid, or building 7, or any number of additional cases of otherwise "unproven" (but proven) shenanigens and government actions. Maybe it's cuz when covid was happening, all the info-dumps here were not obfuscated, slid, derailed, etc. like on /pol/, but that shit is old news
Or unless you want 'proof'/evidence that flat earth is a psyop/conspiratart purity spiral? If that isn't self-evident, then you're either ignorant of flat-earth theory (commendable) or you're very silly
1748650553.png (556.8 KB, 800x547, D308545B808284ECC40ED15AFC68CF97-570120.png)
>>391232
More evasion, more buzzwords, zero substance, as expected. Once again, we see evidence that the internet conspiratard schizo is not interested in discussing or even learning about the topics he claims to have super-sekrit esoteric knowledge of. The whole thing is just about staking out a position as an edgy contrarian, in order to feel superior to the "sheeple."
>video
Welp, that's 22 minutes of my life I'll never get back. Was this the video you meant to post? Maybe you copied the wrong tab? Because this is nothing but some YouTuber ranting about a THC ban in Texas; it has nothing the fuck to do with anything being presently discussed.
>391225
>391226
I'm not even going to bother giving Boom Boom a (You) this time.
[Read more] More evasion, more buzzwords, zero substance, as expected. Once again, we see evidence that the internet conspiratard schizo is not interested in discussing or even learning about the topics he claims to have super-sekrit esoteric knowledge of. The whole thing is just about staking out a position as an edgy contrarian, in order to feel superior to the "sheeple."
>video
Welp, that's 22 minutes of my life I'll never get back. Was this the video you meant to post? Maybe you copied the wrong tab? Because this is nothing but some YouTuber ranting about a THC ban in Texas; it has nothing the fuck to do with anything being presently discussed.
>391225
>391226
I'm not even going to bother giving Boom Boom a (You) this time.
>>390847
Just reading this post anypony understands how bizarre it is.
Not much to add except to call OP out.
Just reading this post anypony understands how bizarre it is.
Not much to add except to call OP out.
>>391257
Since 4chan went down, the Establishment confirmed potential bunkers. Since then they've been running various campaigns of a similar theme to drive engagement and correct 'wrongthink'
Since 4chan went down, the Establishment confirmed potential bunkers. Since then they've been running various campaigns of a similar theme to drive engagement and correct 'wrongthink'
>>390847
Some facts, properly sourced.
Pic 1 - American corporations lobbying for stonewalling the American people on the poisons they add to the food.
Pic 2 - Warning sign on a 5G tower mentioning "flu like symptoms". The roll out of 5G radiation was simultaneous with the covid psyop and flu like symptoms, exactly the same than covid.
Pic 3 and 4 - The zombie page of the CDC. You can't make this shit up. By the way OP, you might want to call the CDC to complain about their crazy conspiracy theory about "zombies".
Some facts, properly sourced.
Pic 1 - American corporations lobbying for stonewalling the American people on the poisons they add to the food.
Pic 2 - Warning sign on a 5G tower mentioning "flu like symptoms". The roll out of 5G radiation was simultaneous with the covid psyop and flu like symptoms, exactly the same than covid.
Pic 3 and 4 - The zombie page of the CDC. You can't make this shit up. By the way OP, you might want to call the CDC to complain about their crazy conspiracy theory about "zombies".
We know boom boom is using a VPN. Is he also pretending to be multiple people?
>>391241
It's like the schizo code or something to never give a direct answer to a question or to link sources.
It's like the schizo code or something to never give a direct answer to a question or to link sources.
>>391275
When the questions are so basic that any search engine, or more precisely any free-to-use AI can provide more contemporaneous sources and examples, no, you DON'T get to be a petulant shit on the internet without backlash
When the questions are so basic that any search engine, or more precisely any free-to-use AI can provide more contemporaneous sources and examples, no, you DON'T get to be a petulant shit on the internet without backlash
>>391276
Yeah I'm sure looking up proof that the world is flat or that every died 2 weeks ago from covid is going to be easy and obvious information to find.
Yeah I'm sure looking up proof that the world is flat or that every died 2 weeks ago from covid is going to be easy and obvious information to find.
>>391280
Who is going to believe the random schizo blogs 3 pages into the search over the .gov and .edu sources at the top and why should they? At least the people from the .edu and .gov sources are making technology that works off those same principles.
Who is going to believe the random schizo blogs 3 pages into the search over the .gov and .edu sources at the top and why should they? At least the people from the .edu and .gov sources are making technology that works off those same principles.
>>391282
You've been told. You can check the Mlpol archives if you want actual information. Suggested prompt: Covid.
You've been told. You can check the Mlpol archives if you want actual information. Suggested prompt: Covid.
Or, if you're THAT asshole, there's 2761 posts in the flat earth thread on /vx/
>>391285
What timing
>15 active users
On a GOOD day. But here's the fun part, most of them aren't the same user. MOST 'users' lurk.
You don't HAVE to post to be 'active' on Mlpol, because we don't have shills, slide threads, or other shit.
It's kinda like what /pol/ COULD look like if it wasn't pozzed by tranny jannies and shills.
We realized this years ago, you're just NOW getting the memo
What timing
>15 active users
On a GOOD day. But here's the fun part, most of them aren't the same user. MOST 'users' lurk.
You don't HAVE to post to be 'active' on Mlpol, because we don't have shills, slide threads, or other shit.
It's kinda like what /pol/ COULD look like if it wasn't pozzed by tranny jannies and shills.
We realized this years ago, you're just NOW getting the memo
>>391287
>We realized this years ago, you're just NOW getting the memo
Nigger, I knew this 8 years ago. Fuck off with your lecturing the obvious.
>We realized this years ago, you're just NOW getting the memo
Nigger, I knew this 8 years ago. Fuck off with your lecturing the obvious.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-836] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
836 replies | 179 files | 130 UUIDs | Page 5
[Add to Thread Watcher]