A purity spiral trend on the right has been emerging for a while now but it has only gotten worse in recent years. Disbelief in the whackiest conspiracy is taken as a sign of disloyalty and anything other then the most retarded take makes you a shill. Examples include:
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
>you think the pharmaceutical companies are greedy assholes who pray on the despairation of sick people?
>Well I think everything the pharmaceutical companies sell is poison and I'm taking wormwood extract to cure my cancer, you cuck!
>you think mega companies moved jobs overseas because the CEOs are amoral pieces of shit who care more about money than the future of their country?
>Well I think its all part of a plan to weaken the West and install communism, FED!
>you are worried about 5G because you think it will greatly enhance digital surveillance?
>well I think 5G will cause cancer and mass death, fag!
>you think the covid vaccine was bad because lockdowns were used as an excuse to attack political enemies and side effects were ultimately worse than the disease?
>well I think its all a part of the NWO depopulation agenda, pharmakike!
>you are worried about AI because of job loss, propaganda bots, and surveillance concerns?
>well I think AI is actually a demonic force in computer form, fag!
>you hate Hollywood movies because they are controlled by a few studios who push stale liberal trash?
>well I think Hollywood is putting secret symbols and predictive programming in their films to control the population, tranny!
Ect
It isn't enough to distrust the failing institutions, you need to believe they are part of a satanic plot as well. This has only gotten worse over time and I suspect it will only continue get worse over time. Is there any way this can be stopped before it collapses under the weight of its own bullshit into a flat earth singularity?
And I know many of you will claim that some of the crazier claims are pushed by bad actors, and you are probably right to some extent, but silly shit like germ theory denial and flat earth are becoming more common especially on the right. Is there a way to stop this?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
1748184081.jpg (62.5 KB, 612x612, 445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg)
786 replies and 169 files omitted.
>>392054
You didn't even address his argument.
>character assassination
You called him an anti-white shill first, you absolute hypocrite. That's character assassination.
You didn't even address his argument.
>character assassination
You called him an anti-white shill first, you absolute hypocrite. That's character assassination.
>>392024
He just listed six different reasons for why he hates Jews. See >>392021 He is clearly not pro-Jew.
This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling. You meet another guy who hates Jews, but you ostracize him for not believing 100% of the conspiracies that you do. The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews.
He just listed six different reasons for why he hates Jews. See >>392021 He is clearly not pro-Jew.
This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling. You meet another guy who hates Jews, but you ostracize him for not believing 100% of the conspiracies that you do. The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews.
>>392060
>This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling.
OP is beyond salvation and calling him out is a community service.
If You See Something, Say Something.
>This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling.
OP is beyond salvation and calling him out is a community service.
If You See Something, Say Something.
>>392061
How is a person who hates Jews for six different reasons a "Jew apologist", just because they're skeptical of one additional reason? Explain that logic.
How is a person who hates Jews for six different reasons a "Jew apologist", just because they're skeptical of one additional reason? Explain that logic.
>>392065
It shows that they actually need reasons and not just vibes and desire for validation, and that they won't drink koolaid with the rest of the bandwagon when it's time to get raptured by aliens.
It shows that they actually need reasons and not just vibes and desire for validation, and that they won't drink koolaid with the rest of the bandwagon when it's time to get raptured by aliens.
>>392072
True, there are dozens, if not hundreds of reasons to hate Jews.
That doesn't mean that an Anon is pro-Jew for not believing one particular reason.
True, there are dozens, if not hundreds of reasons to hate Jews.
That doesn't mean that an Anon is pro-Jew for not believing one particular reason.
>>390847
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
From the kikes' mouth, Israel’s Satanic Elite Revealed.
B-but that's schizo stuff.
https://voxday.net/2025/06/13/israels-satanic-elite-revealed/
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/04/23/bottom-of-darkness-children-raped-in-ritual-ceremonies-expose-the-horrors/
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-856407
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
From the kikes' mouth, Israel’s Satanic Elite Revealed.
B-but that's schizo stuff.
https://voxday.net/2025/06/13/israels-satanic-elite-revealed/
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/04/23/bottom-of-darkness-children-raped-in-ritual-ceremonies-expose-the-horrors/
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-856407
>>392358
These articles do prove that there are some fucked up people in the halls of power, but they don't exactly show that jews are satanic baby eaters. Ritual abuse is horrific, but it isn't a uniquely jewish phenomenon. Christian priests notably catholics and Muslims have been known to do similar shit. These kinds of people use their positions of power to hide what they are doing and network with other fucked up people. In the halls of power intelligence agencies find these sick fucks easy to blackmail and therefore useful so the problem doesn't get fixed. I will acknowledge that fucked up networks of human trafficking exist, but I do not think they control the world or are representative of all of the elites or even kikes for that matter. And think about this, why would jpost even post an article about this if those kinds of people were controlling the world?
These articles do prove that there are some fucked up people in the halls of power, but they don't exactly show that jews are satanic baby eaters. Ritual abuse is horrific, but it isn't a uniquely jewish phenomenon. Christian priests notably catholics and Muslims have been known to do similar shit. These kinds of people use their positions of power to hide what they are doing and network with other fucked up people. In the halls of power intelligence agencies find these sick fucks easy to blackmail and therefore useful so the problem doesn't get fixed. I will acknowledge that fucked up networks of human trafficking exist, but I do not think they control the world or are representative of all of the elites or even kikes for that matter. And think about this, why would jpost even post an article about this if those kinds of people were controlling the world?
>>392359
>argument from incredulity
>#notalljews
Really? No shit, it isn't all jews, just like all muslims aren't involved in rape/grooming gangs.
It's always 'just' the ones who can get away with it
>argument from incredulity
>#notalljews
Really? No shit, it isn't all jews, just like all muslims aren't involved in rape/grooming gangs.
It's always 'just' the ones who can get away with it
>>392372
Again I'm not saying child abuse doesn't happen, but I don't think a satanic child abuse cult runs the planet. That is what I am getting at here. This thread is about how people not believing the most hyperbolic schizophrenic takes are often viewed as disloyal.
Again I'm not saying child abuse doesn't happen, but I don't think a satanic child abuse cult runs the planet. That is what I am getting at here. This thread is about how people not believing the most hyperbolic schizophrenic takes are often viewed as disloyal.
>>392374
No one has presently suggested disloyalty, what's being alleged is naivete. You haven't even made an argument, all you have done is display disbelief.
Lets try and put this another way.
What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
>are you suggesting that little old jewish ladies will commit satanic child sacrifice
No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
No one has presently suggested disloyalty, what's being alleged is naivete. You haven't even made an argument, all you have done is display disbelief.
Lets try and put this another way.
What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
>are you suggesting that little old jewish ladies will commit satanic child sacrifice
No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
>>392375
>What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
Of course they wait until they get away with it.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
I agree with this 100% and this is why I don't want these people anywhere near my country.
>What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
Of course they wait until they get away with it.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
I agree with this 100% and this is why I don't want these people anywhere near my country.
>>392375
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
And this is true of anything with kikes. Especially bad business practices and their nepotism makes the problem orders of magnitude worse than other ethnic groups. Again look at the original post.
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
And this is true of anything with kikes. Especially bad business practices and their nepotism makes the problem orders of magnitude worse than other ethnic groups. Again look at the original post.
>>392359
People that downplay JEWS have 0 grasp on todays politics.
Jews/judaism are not just random people that get in to positions of power.
It is basically oldest running criminal/evil organization in the world.
People that downplay JEWS have 0 grasp on todays politics.
Jews/judaism are not just random people that get in to positions of power.
It is basically oldest running criminal/evil organization in the world.
>you tricked me
Not for the first time ^_~
Not for the first time ^_~
>>392379
I do not downplay the jew. I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon, but a biological phenomenon similar to slave making ants. When social structures get large enough there is an incentive for social parasitism and culture of the jew is adapted to social parasitism. The slave making ants do not enslave and destroy host colonies because they do so out of malice or allegiances to dark ant gods they do so because they are social parasites who can only survive by taking the resources of working ants. Similarly the jew is adapted to take the resources of other groups of people who do real work. Their culture and religion bind them together and give them license to behave like shit to their hosts and they do then the host has an "immune response" where they are removed and then they adapt new methods to evade the immune system. If the immune system does clear out an infection the host dies.
I do not downplay the jew. I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon, but a biological phenomenon similar to slave making ants. When social structures get large enough there is an incentive for social parasitism and culture of the jew is adapted to social parasitism. The slave making ants do not enslave and destroy host colonies because they do so out of malice or allegiances to dark ant gods they do so because they are social parasites who can only survive by taking the resources of working ants. Similarly the jew is adapted to take the resources of other groups of people who do real work. Their culture and religion bind them together and give them license to behave like shit to their hosts and they do then the host has an "immune response" where they are removed and then they adapt new methods to evade the immune system. If the immune system does clear out an infection the host dies.
>>392394
I know some people here do not like Wikipedia, but these are worth reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave-making_ant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host%E2%80%93parasite_coevolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism#Social_parasitism
I know some people here do not like Wikipedia, but these are worth reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave-making_ant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host%E2%80%93parasite_coevolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism#Social_parasitism
>>392402
I am not religious, but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint and still view them as a civilization ending threat? Nothing I said downplays the severity of the enemy.
I am not religious, but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint and still view them as a civilization ending threat? Nothing I said downplays the severity of the enemy.
>>392403
>but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint
Given how religious thinking works I'm pretty sure they can't or don't want to. Like their continued ability to remain othered from their ideals and keep them instead on the object of their religion necessarily requires they don't think about how someone not under such bondage might instead think of something. Doing so would risk reclaiming those ideals as their own, being creative with them and destroying that religious understanding.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-art-and-religion
>but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint
Given how religious thinking works I'm pretty sure they can't or don't want to. Like their continued ability to remain othered from their ideals and keep them instead on the object of their religion necessarily requires they don't think about how someone not under such bondage might instead think of something. Doing so would risk reclaiming those ideals as their own, being creative with them and destroying that religious understanding.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-art-and-religion
>>392375
>No one has presently suggested disloyalty
People have been calling eachother Jews and shills throughout this entire thread.
>>392378
This.
>>392379
>People that downplay JEWS
Nobody is downplaying Jews.
>>392394
Interesting take. I largely agree.
>>392403
This.
[Read more] >No one has presently suggested disloyalty
People have been calling eachother Jews and shills throughout this entire thread.
>>392378
This.
>>392379
>People that downplay JEWS
Nobody is downplaying Jews.
>>392394
Interesting take. I largely agree.
>>392403
This.
>>392487
And niggers. Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc., or is this ordinary anon-board faire?
And niggers. Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc., or is this ordinary anon-board faire?
>>392488
>Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc
Actually, yes. I've been here long enough to know that there are retards here who think that anyone who disagrees with them is a shill.
Whether or not they wholeheartedly believe it is an open question, but the purity spiral persists either way.
>Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc
Actually, yes. I've been here long enough to know that there are retards here who think that anyone who disagrees with them is a shill.
Whether or not they wholeheartedly believe it is an open question, but the purity spiral persists either way.
>>392489
Then you haven't been here for long enough, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I'll suffice to say
>lol, can't handle the bantz
Then you haven't been here for long enough, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I'll suffice to say
>lol, can't handle the bantz
>>392490
It isn't so much "can't handle the bantz" so much as it is there was once a lot more actual political discussion and over time that discussion became shut down when intellectual midgets started shouting "shill shill shill" at any disagreement to avoid having a real discussion or challenging their views.
It isn't so much "can't handle the bantz" so much as it is there was once a lot more actual political discussion and over time that discussion became shut down when intellectual midgets started shouting "shill shill shill" at any disagreement to avoid having a real discussion or challenging their views.
>>392496
I mean if just wanted to be called heretic all day I could just start posting my spiciest takes on reddit until I get banned and make new accounts.
I mean if just wanted to be called heretic all day I could just start posting my spiciest takes on reddit until I get banned and make new accounts.
>>392496
This
It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
This
It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
>>392379
To up-play the problem, that organization includes every abrahamic religion. Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel and politicians that support israel and various islamic princes with oil rigs and gold mines. Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar. And since church attendance is required, you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you.
Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to, and limiting it to only jews downplays that. Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists, christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian) and islamists, and islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews. Recognising this is full scope doesn't downplay the role of any trirant composing it, but in fact adds to the list of reasons all three are reprehensible.
To up-play the problem, that organization includes every abrahamic religion. Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel and politicians that support israel and various islamic princes with oil rigs and gold mines. Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar. And since church attendance is required, you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you.
Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to, and limiting it to only jews downplays that. Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists, christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian) and islamists, and islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews. Recognising this is full scope doesn't downplay the role of any trirant composing it, but in fact adds to the list of reasons all three are reprehensible.
>>392498
>It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Holyshit it is and many of the rtd posters were just as retarded as the facebook boomers so they became facebook boomers.
>It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Holyshit it is and many of the rtd posters were just as retarded as the facebook boomers so they became facebook boomers.
>>392499
>Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel
This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
And that only really became a thing in the second half of the 20th century: it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
>Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar.
Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>church attendance is required
Not true.
>you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you
Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
>Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to
"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
>Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists
Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose.
They thrive in modern secular society too.
>christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian)
How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims or "Satanists" for thousands of years.
>islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews
Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
>>392501
Ikr
[Read more] >Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel
This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
And that only really became a thing in the second half of the 20th century: it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
>Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar.
Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>church attendance is required
Not true.
>you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you
Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
>Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to
"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
>Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists
Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose.
They thrive in modern secular society too.
>christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian)
How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims or "Satanists" for thousands of years.
>islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews
Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
>>392501
Ikr
>>392502
>This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
>it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
Oh definitely, they glow as bright as a gun show. There's a good essay I read about that, in fact, if I find it I'll link.
>Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
Well I'll look into that. I've sorta skipped over looking into what muslims are about since they're like, sand bandits with oil. Surely there's not much to them other than being in a nice spot geographically.
>church attendance is required
Well that's what the churches I attended said, is that an evangelical thing?
>Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
My christianity phase was a cycle of going to every church on the map in my city and ecountering the same shit. If it's a matter of pozzed and unpozzed then the latter is geographically unavailable to me.
>"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
All three will stab ya if you're pagan, and pagan is just anything non-abrahamic. If not an institution or ideology proper, they still cooperate when it comes to anti-paganism.
>Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose. They thrive in modern secular society too.
>How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims [...] for thousands of years.
Mostly talking about the modern institutions of these two.
>or "Satanists"
Is it a mainly evangelical thing to point at everything as satanic and conspiracies of authorities doing awful shit because of satanism (rather than economics)? Seems like christians need actual satanists around to keep the hype up.
[Read more] >This is mostly just American Evangelicals, a sect that has been so transparently subverted by Mossad it's unreal.
>it was a recently-manufactured cultural shift orchestrated by glowniggers.
Oh definitely, they glow as bright as a gun show. There's a good essay I read about that, in fact, if I find it I'll link.
>Muslims openly hate Jews, and they double-hate Israel.
>Most Muslim countries have no Christians or Jews at all. They get a long just fine with their barbaric sandnigger lives without Christians or Jews.
Well I'll look into that. I've sorta skipped over looking into what muslims are about since they're like, sand bandits with oil. Surely there's not much to them other than being in a nice spot geographically.
>church attendance is required
Well that's what the churches I attended said, is that an evangelical thing?
>Or you go to another church that isn't as pozzed.
My christianity phase was a cycle of going to every church on the map in my city and ecountering the same shit. If it's a matter of pozzed and unpozzed then the latter is geographically unavailable to me.
>"Abrahamism" is not an organization. It's not even one ideology.
All three will stab ya if you're pagan, and pagan is just anything non-abrahamic. If not an institution or ideology proper, they still cooperate when it comes to anti-paganism.
>Jews have been doing what they do in the Egyptian, Roman and Persian empires, long before those religions rose. They thrive in modern secular society too.
>How? Christians survived in Europe without contact with Jews, Muslims [...] for thousands of years.
Mostly talking about the modern institutions of these two.
>or "Satanists"
Is it a mainly evangelical thing to point at everything as satanic and conspiracies of authorities doing awful shit because of satanism (rather than economics)? Seems like christians need actual satanists around to keep the hype up.
>>392502
In one way I am glad that ethnonationalism has become adopted by normies but it seems to have been adopted by some of the most retarded normies and I suspect that is because low IQ Whites are especially disenfranchised.
In one way I am glad that ethnonationalism has become adopted by normies but it seems to have been adopted by some of the most retarded normies and I suspect that is because low IQ Whites are especially disenfranchised.
>>392505
Oldfag /pol/ users in 2017 described this as the devil's bargain: they won the election in 2016, but the result of that was being flooded with redditors.
Similarly, in 2021 the push to get people to shake off their blind trust in government, media and academic institutions largely succeeded in the aftermath of 2020 lockdowns, but the result was Q-tier boomers inviting themselves into right wing online spaces and shitting up the place.
Oldfag /pol/ users in 2017 described this as the devil's bargain: they won the election in 2016, but the result of that was being flooded with redditors.
Similarly, in 2021 the push to get people to shake off their blind trust in government, media and academic institutions largely succeeded in the aftermath of 2020 lockdowns, but the result was Q-tier boomers inviting themselves into right wing online spaces and shitting up the place.
>>392507
I remember this. I first started using /pol/ back in 2013. It has really gone down hill since then. They fall of 8chan was really devastating for discussion on the far right too. It's crazy to think about but /mlpol/ is probably the longest surviving alt-/pol/. The rest all got taken down due to shooters or drama.
I remember this. I first started using /pol/ back in 2013. It has really gone down hill since then. They fall of 8chan was really devastating for discussion on the far right too. It's crazy to think about but /mlpol/ is probably the longest surviving alt-/pol/. The rest all got taken down due to shooters or drama.
>>392507
This was among several of the - let's not call them errors, let's call them 'consequences' - that 4/mlpol/ made glaringly obvious, and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
This was among several of the - let's not call them errors, let's call them 'consequences' - that 4/mlpol/ made glaringly obvious, and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
>>392526
>and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Exactly we left /pol/ because it had become shit. Let's try to prevent this place sharing the same fate.
>and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Exactly we left /pol/ because it had become shit. Let's try to prevent this place sharing the same fate.
>>392528
Haaa, you don't know. This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/, in that you can take heart
Haaa, you don't know. This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/, in that you can take heart
Some depopulation stuff.
>>392539
None of these prove anything. Image one is some random on twitter. The second one is just Pfizer pitching about their product. And even the third one doesn't show that there is some secret plant to depopulate the planet. If you were an elite and the fertility crisis was ongoing and your immigration solution didn't work would you not bring that up at a meeting?
None of these prove anything. Image one is some random on twitter. The second one is just Pfizer pitching about their product. And even the third one doesn't show that there is some secret plant to depopulate the planet. If you were an elite and the fertility crisis was ongoing and your immigration solution didn't work would you not bring that up at a meeting?
>>392536
>This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/
You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems.
/mlpol/ may be too obscure to be completely overrun by bots and redditors, but a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes who are not deterred by the horse porn can shit the place up all the same, drive away contentfags, and generally make the board unpleasant and unproductive to use. It's important to be aware of that and not take site quality for granted.
>>392571
Do you have an actual counterargument?
>This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/
You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems.
/mlpol/ may be too obscure to be completely overrun by bots and redditors, but a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes who are not deterred by the horse porn can shit the place up all the same, drive away contentfags, and generally make the board unpleasant and unproductive to use. It's important to be aware of that and not take site quality for granted.
>>392571
Do you have an actual counterargument?
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-836] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
836 replies | 179 files | 130 UUIDs | Page 5
[Add to Thread Watcher]