>>391272>Some facts, properly sourced.Oh, cool, I love properly sourced facts. I'm going to use a sophisticated, high-tech tool called "google" to look into these, hope you don't mind.
>pic 1This letter is about a bill in Texas currently going back and forth between the House and Senate. One of the provisions of the House version would require packaged food manufacturers to add warning labels to food containing "artificial colors, food additives, or other ingredients banned by Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom." Here is the complete bill if you want to dig through it:
https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB25/id/3133136If this were to pass, all it would mean is that packaged foods containing these ingredients would have to have a warning label affixed to the package. It's worth noting that companies are already required to list ingredients on packaging, and anyone who wants to know what is in their food can just look. The only thing this would affect is whether or not there is a giant, obnoxious warning label on the front of the package.
My guess is that food companies are lobbying against this because these kinds of laws are a pain in the ass to comply with, and in the grand scheme of things they don't really do anything for public health. California already has a ton of similar laws in place, which should already tell you something. What this law would basically mean is that if Frito Lay wants to sell Doritos in Texas, then they need to redesign all their packaging to include a big, silly label informing people that there is Red Dye #5 or whatever the fuck inside. Best case scenario, it just adds extra cost to the process of manufacturing and packaging Doritos, and odds are that cost just will be passed on to the consumer through a price increase. But yeah, I guess if you live in Texas and having giant stupid labels on food is really important to you for whatever the fuck reason, by all means call your representative and let them know you support HB-25.
>pic 2I don't even need to google anything here. This warning label simply informs the reader that 5G towers emit radiation that can cause problems if you stand within 100 ft of the tower for too long. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of 5G I guess, but it's straightforward enough. However, you go on to say:
>The roll out of 5G radiation was simultaneous with the covid psyop and flu like symptoms, exactly the same than covid.You seem to be implying that, because 5G towers can cause "flu-like symptoms" and the towers started going up around the time of the pandemic, that symptoms attributed to COVID-19 were actually caused by 5G radiation. That's a pretty huge leap. This is another issue I have with conspiratards: they seem to draw a lot of their conclusions by connecting dots that don't necessarily connect. At the very least, it seems like if the government actually went to all the trouble of inventing a fake disease to cover up symptoms caused by 5G radiation, then they wouldn't also put warning labels about those very symptoms on the 5G towers; that would sort of defeat the whole point. Unless, of course, the whole point was just to scatter enough breadcrumbs to convince some terminally online retard to waste his life looking into stuff like this.
>pic 3This one is bizarre enough that I felt some serious digging was warranted. Here's what I found:
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6023Here is the description:
>CDC has a fun new way of teaching the importance of emergency preparedness. Our new graphic novel, "Preparedness 101: Zombie Pandemic" demonstrates the importance of being prepared in an entertaining way that people of all ages will enjoy. Readers follow Todd, Julie, and their dog Max as a strange new disease begins spreading, turning ordinary people into zombies. Stick around to the end for a surprising twist that will drive home the importance of being prepared for any emergency. Included in the novel is a Preparedness Checklist so that readers can get their family, workplace, or school ready before disaster strikes.So, in other words,
this is a joke. The CDC is not providing serious instructions about preparing for a literal zombie apocalypse, the CDC published a
comic book which uses a
fictional story about a zombie pandemic as an instruction tool. In fact, if you look closely at
your own screen shot, you will clearly see that the words
"zombie graphic novel" appear directly under "Zombie Preparedness."
Also worth noting is that the listed publication date for this is 2011, when The Walking Dead would have been at the height of its popularity. Basically, this is the CDC piggybacking off of a pop culture phenomenon in order to teach disaster preparedness. That is
all this is. Anyone who isn't a terminally online, gullible retard would be able to see this almost immediately.
In the 1930s, Orson Welles broadcast a radio play based on HG Wells's The War of the Worlds. It was obviously fiction, and presumably the producers thought that most people would realize this without being explicitly told, so they framed the story as a fake news broadcast. However, apparently some people heard the broadcast and thought it was actual news, so they packed up their belongings and fled into the hills to hide from the alien invaders. I remember reading about it in High School and wondering how on earth anyone could possibly be that fucking dumb. Now, having spent roughly a decade on the dumbest corners of the internet, listening to morons babble on and on about chemtrails and satanic child sacrifice cults... I no longer wonder.
>pic 4This is literally just a screenshot of the CDC's contact information. I have no idea why you saw fit to include this here.