/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg
Conspiratard Purity Spiralling
Anonymous
f643d15
?
No.390847
390850 390858 390868 390869 390933 390952 391005 391213 391257 391272 392012 392358
            [Read more]            
786 replies and 165 files omitted.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391405
391407
>>391398
You don't have to say their names, but next time (cuz NO ONE believes you) you want to parade corpses for good-boi points? Do try, it will work next time, I promise
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391407
391408 391410
>>391400
>If you don't know why sewage is better than water by NOW?
I rarely even drink milk, it's too sweet. It's nice if your throat hurts but there's less expensive sources of calcium like oranges. Orange concentrate keeps better in the freezer, and while you can freeze milk it fucks with the flavor too much.
>>391405
>I didn't tell you to doxx yourself or say anyone's names, just identifiable pictures that could be tied back to you
You could've wormed your way out but instead highlighted the glow of your prior statements.
>parade corpses
When anti-vaxx shit had proven time and time again to be a method of psychological-to-biological warfare to the point where it is a maundane thing to know people that've been killed by it. Saying you don't believe me is like saying you don't believe someone from Alberquerque knows people that have died in drive-bys.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391408
>>391407
and yes I am aware oranges are sweeter than milk, but it's sweet in a plant way, not a meat way. Milk is sweeter than the image of what milk should taste like in my head and it's unpleasant. Milk chocolate is nice tho.
John Elway
## HorseWhisperer
0000000
?
No.391409
391410
>>391384
> If this OP's subversion is allowed and probably vetted by the management (I don't see any meaningful push back), then this site is a honeypot.
Oh, go fuck yourself. You have freer speech here than just about anywhere else online, and if you don’t like it you’re just as free to leave. Nobody is stopping you from spouting whatever kind of schizo retard nonsense you like. If you keep getting btfo because you have no idea what you’re talking about, though, don’t blame the management.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391410
391417
>>391407
Your disingenuity is unmistakable. Raw milk is superior on every front, ask me how I know.
Oh I won't answer, I expect you to do your due diligence (hint, it has to do with soluble proteins, active enzymes, and a whole bunch of other shit facebook didn't tell you)
>>391409
I'm genuinely curious what would happen WERE they to send their best
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391412
391413 391422
>>390859
this is just faggy whining nonsense and a complete non-issue compared to what our enemies (the left) are all STILL currently at each other's throats over (Palestine). Just literally looking for a problem lmao like who the fuck cares
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391413
391416
>>391412
>'our' enemies
>(the left)
If 'your' only enemies are the left, you should lurk moar
Anonymous
3f30f7e
?
No.391414
391422
I remain unconvinced on the topic of OP's rambling mess and the continued derailment of this thread does not help, cuz this sort of thing only happens when either:
>one person is being a nonce on purpose
>everyone else already dismissed OP as a faggot

So, get fucked faggot OP.
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391416
391418
>>391413
don't pull rank on me because there's nothing else going on today, nigger faggot. you know what I mean.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391417
391418
>>391410
>facebook
Oh that explains it. My sole response is to check out the fediverse and it's many superior FOSS alternatives to Zuckerberg's wares.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391418
391423
>>391416
Then don't be using questionable/rhetorical terms like "our" if you're going to say basic-ass shit. It's neither endearing nor appreciable, it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself, while affecting the opposite.
>>391417
For clarity, BoomBoom got his 'name' because all he tends to do is post Boomer-tier facebook memes and deflect from actual discussion.
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391421
391429
>>391418>>391418
>Then don't be using questionable/rhetorical terms like "our" if you're going to say basic-ass shit. It's neither endearing nor appreciable, it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself, while affecting the opposite.
and this post makes you sound like a complete cunt faggot, so I guess were even. What the fuck happened to this place.
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391422
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391423
391451
>>391418
>it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself
And (You) sound like an egotistical faggot.
Anonymous
fd773c8
?
No.391429
>>391421
Faggots drove people off.
Anonymous
15cb4c2
?
No.391431
391434 391442
1050110__explicit_coloratura_solo_female_pony_mare_clothes_nudity_smiling_solo+female_looking+at+you_vulva_anus_plot_bedroom+eyes_looking+back_vagina.jpeg
1220892__explicit_solo_female_pony_mare_nudity_earth+pony_blushing_solo+female_looking+at+you_nipples_vulva_anus_bedroom+eyes_vagina_ponut_ponified_v.png
1311173__explicit_pony_oc_clothes_oc+only_nudity_male_pegasus_human_straight_sex_tongue+out_anus_cum_commission_socks_penetration_underhoof_vagina_po.jpeg
1335320__explicit_solo_female_oc_clothes_oc+only_nudity_blushing_solo+female_vulva_anus_hat_socks_underhoof_vagina_ass_ponut_bed_bow_clitoris_on+back.jpeg
1354587__explicit_female_pony_oc_mare_clothes_oc+only_simple+background_nudity_earth+pony_transparent+background_blushing_looking+at+you_nipples_vulv.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
3c1f9e9
?
No.391434
>>391431
God forbid people ask for evidence of claims. Special boy is angry.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391442
391451
large.jpg
>>391431
>spoonfeeding
That's for inside jokes and (worse case) board etiquitte, not the substance of a discussion. I have the bad habit of not linking stuff too but it's absurd to assert such malpractice as just.
I'm planning to make an HTML doc to sort links to sources for my opinions as a mindfulness excersize.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391451
391452
>>391423
*curtsies*
>>391442
This IS a spoonfeeding of board etiquette.
Anonymous
5e63312
?
No.391452
391463 391464
>>391451
>if I pretend to be smarter than other people then I shouldn't have to show evidence to back up my positions.
That's you. That's what you sound like.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391463
391474
>>391452
You seem to no appreciate that the lack of compliance has more to do with your demanding attitude than anyone's unwillingness.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391464
391468 391474
>>391452
Here's what I'll do.
Go to search, at the top.
Deselect everything but Mlpol
Enter "Covid" in the search bar
Click "OP text only"
Scroll past the recent shit, and you will find that Archived threads - the ones where all you would like to know - will show up further down the list. Look for Derpy I Am Science, I recall that one being decent. There's plenty of others, leading all the way back to when it first began, depending on when the archive was implemented
Anonymous
128baa2
?
No.391468
391470
>>391464
I can see why you didn't want to link sources. That thread literally links to a blog.
https://mlpol.net/mlpol/archive/364575#364575 if I look further back I can see obvious bullshit like germ theory denial.
Anonymous
c1e47de
?
No.391470
391473
>>391468
So this means you're capable of following instructions! Now if you'll go back to the search results, KEEP SCROLLING and you will find THIS (you'll find #2 before that)
>>256683 →
Anonymous
c1e47de
?
No.391472
391474
>inb4 you could have done that to begin with
No, you had to be dragged through the process of using the search function. This has been a public service
Anonymous
79517c9
?
No.391473
391478
>>391470
You specified the "I am the science" thread as a good one and many of these threads are full of shit like germ theory denial. Why make someone wade through shit when you could make your case and give supporting evidence?
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391474
>>391463
>muh attitude
Then explain yourself to the rest of us reading it
>>391464
We all already know how to use the search function.
>>391472
>you had to be dragged through the process of using the search function
See above.
>This has been a public service
You are a clown.
Anonymous
b58dae5
?
No.391476
I zoned out of the babbling, like, a damn week ago.

But I am enthralled so keep going bro.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391478
rawp.png
>>391473
Yes. I'm Ninjaz. I use subversive tactics. I'm still the asshole, and you're still the idiot
Anonymous
7a9337a
?
No.391479
391481 391487
1695360925088599.gif
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391481
>>391479
Yes, it's very easy to be critical several years in the aftermath, but you're reading it "as it happened" where NO ONE 'knew' what the fuck.
At LEAST learn to TRY to contextualize the information you're consuming.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391482
391483
We never DID get a good explanation for the people keeling over en masse in china, did we?
Anonymous
6099429
?
No.391483
391487
>>391482
More deadly strain in the beginning. Parasites tend towards an optimal virulence to help them spread. Too deadly and they will burn themselves out. Not deadly enough and they can't penetrate the host's defenses.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_virulence
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391484
391486 391487 391518
large (73).png
large (60).png
large (22).jpg
large (21).jpg
>Wikipedia
Anonymous
6099429
?
No.391486
391488
>>391484
Would you prefer the journal evolutionary biology?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01658.x
It's from 2009. This isn't a new hypothesis.
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391487
391489
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391488
2256506__safe_solo_oc_artist+needed_ebola_oc-colon-ebola-dash-chan.png
>>391486
I remember having this discussion on /pol/ about the Ebola outbreak a decade ago. Ebola is not normally threatening enough to cause mass outbreaks, but that particular strain of Ebola has mutated to be less deadly, which meant its hosts survived long enough to spread (also ebola can spread post-mortem, which meant traditional African funerals where all family members touched the bodies became superspreader events).
Anonymous
2d6723e
?
No.391489
391490
>>391487
Nothing that isn't rhetorical and pertaining to your character, no I don't have a counter-argument
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391490
391498
>>391489
Then why even bother speaking up?
Do you disagree with the notion of Optimal Virulence?
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391498
>>391490
Because he is seeking to drive off people who want real discussion... I mean shills.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391518
391557
>>391484
>wikipedia le bad
If you have an issue with the article's contents you can open a discussion there to improve it.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391557
391559 391571
>>391518
No, Wikipedia is not a credible source
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391559
391560 391569
>>391557
Do you actually have an issue with the contents, or are you just wasting our time?
The other guy posted a 2009 study. Read that.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391560
391561
>>391559
The article didn't tell him he is a special boy.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391561
391565
>>391560
What a retard, wasting everyone's time. He's almost as bad as the boomer.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391565
391569
>>391561
Pretty sure he has received almost as many permabans too.
Anonymous
a2e0837
?
No.391569
391572
>>391559
The problem is that it's one potential explanation out of dozens, among which this one simply doesn't seem as plausible when taken in conjunction of how events transpired. Remember the 'Summer of Love' riots?
I don't have any authority on which to say that's not a possibility, I'm saying I don't buy it.
>>391565
>almost as many
Please, only Nigel can compete
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391571
>>391557
Which sources does the wikipedia article use that you have qualms with? Wikipedia is basically a manually indexed and summarised search engine, it isn't the source itself, but it is a credible source of sources.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391572
391585
>>391569
>Remember the 'Summer of Love' riots?
Why would shitlibs and niggers fucking shit up discredit optimal virulence?
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391585
391588
>>391572
They don't, in fact they kind-of make the idea somewhat ridiculous, in fact. The summer of love is when people just over THERE were dropping dead "from Covid". But apparently, Covid is less virulent when niggers are mad about a stupid nigger dying?

Thread Watcher
TW