/mlpol/ - /mlpolit/

Name
Email	Don't show my flag
Subject	Spoiler Image By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment	0
Select	File / Oekaki
File(s)	Oekaki drawing - Select File instead
Oekaki
Password	(For file and/or post deletion.)

>The Conspirators' Hierarchy - The Committee of 300 - (by John Coleman) (1992).
>Undoubtedly the “Bible” of conspiracy books, the completely revised and updated Fourth Edition landmark book is filled with information not previously disclosed. It names one of the contenders for the White House who is closely related to one of the oldest “300” families whose fortune was derived from opium trade with China, and no, it is not any of the Bush clan. The origin of the Committee of 300 is described; how it has evolved from an opium trading company with a Royal Charter to become the de-facto secret upper-level parallel government of the United States and the world, with only Russia and China standing in opposition to it.
>A highly organized secret society with tentacles reaching into every level of government in the United States and indeed, the world, backed by massive financing and run by men of the highest education and intelligence, with vast resources at their disposal, manages the thousands of major political and economical and contrived situations. In the FOURTH EDITION there is listed some very prominent men who came forward to support the existence of the “300.” One of them predicted twenty years ago that “The United States will be turned into a welfare state” and that “with the exception of Russia all nations would unite in a world alliance (The One World Government).” Perhaps the most startling admission of the existence of the super-secret organization came from President Wilson in the last days of his presidency:
>“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
>The “power” Wilson was talking about is the Committee of 300 and Wilson knew he did not dare to mention it by name.

>>347623
I want the books because they document the elite’s horseshit, the left’s subversive actions in pedowood, academia, the liberal media’s shenanigans in general, and of course the intelligence community. Why anybody would be interested in the one on the Bohemian Grove should be self‐evident to anybody who knows anything. The Illuminati books might be worth a read.

>conservacuck
100% fair assessment.

>e-celeb
>never named to jew
>never mentions White Genocide
These three pretty much go together. Naming the Jew or calling out white genocide by name without the cover of anonymity is a surefire way to sideline yourself in the culture war and render yourself incapable of affecting change for the foreseeable future. And with the political zeitgeist being what it is mentioning either other than in the most oblique of terms runs the very real risk of being cancelled, being singled out for both open governmental (and government‐sanctioned) harassment, and being explicitly targeted by NGOs. Demanding it of people, at this point in time, with what’s at stake?

>grifter
I singled this one out because it annoys me when people misuse it. Is he disingenuous? If he actually believes what he says then it isn’t grifting. It may be the result of cowardice, naïvety, stupidity, or cognitive dissonance, but it ain’t a grift. If you just despise his tendency to merchandise then say so and stop diluting the term. If you despise his cowardice then say so. If you think he’s naïve or stupid then say so and stop misusing grifter like a leftist does — as a cudgel rather than a meaningful descriptor. Reserve the term for actual grifters. Like Vaush, AOC, Patrisse Cullors, Al Sharpton, etc.