/qa/ - Questions and Answers

Keeping the community together by giving you a voice


New Teatime planned. Join us for Teatime with Ponies this Saturday around 3-4pm CST!
* Time and place is subject to change depending on feasibility.

If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Thread, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

2311559.gif
Bugs you found, and changes I made
Pupper
## Admin
No.5911
5915
Bugs you found, and changes I made

Just thought I'd create this thread where you can post any bugs or problems with the site you encounter. And also for me to post any big changes I made.
55 replies and 16 files omitted.
Pupper
## Admin
No.6262
6263
>>6260
>>6261
Yep I see there is a bug in the dice system when it comes to displaying negative results, and that a dice roll of zero dices should not be performed. I'll look into the other portions regarding dicerolls you mention, but have to read it more thoroughly.
Thanks for doing the testing and finding the bug. I will fix and update the code so negative dice rolls also shows up.
Anonymous
No.6263
>>6262
>and that a dice roll of zero dices should not be performed
i think it should, but it should always spit zero... or perhaps to give it utility, it could spit out some random phrases based on taking the 0 as a one(so only one phrase) and taking the dn+/-N as variables(which could be "r", [0dr&r], etc etc...) and -0 could be sad/gloomy/negative phrases, this also jives well with my request of making it (008800)green, since you know:
>green
this could in turn be taken as a more useful(?) version of the fortune option of 4chan's /s4s/, although me mentioning that might have just made the idea look to you as a "definitely hard pass, if anything perhaps(P.E.R.H.A.P.S) the always 0, but no random phrases, we want zero to none spammadge, thank you very much"
or just to be silly: 0d/-0d(regardless of the other parameters on the roll)= 0 and -0 respectively, and 00d/-00d is the phrase thing(which i might add, both the green color and 0/00 thing would put them in line with an american roulette in terms of aesthetic)
ALSO: i saw that over at 8chan.moe they don't have an oekaki tool, and so after making the request here(>>6231 its me) i made an as poorly written as >>6231 request on there(https://8chan.moe/site/res/134.html#3194)
then later i wrote https://8chan.moe/site/res/134.html#q3213 a more thorough version of >>6235, you might want to check it
for among the things i requested over there is for the moe devmod to get in contact with you so that you can work together on the oekaki tool instead of ether of you having to do it by themselves, that being said he will be occupied with the 2.6 update for a while, so you should talk to him and see when he is available
oh and according to both the 8moe devmod and wolfram alpha 1d0 should give 0 as the answer(https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1+0+face+dice+roll+chance), currently does [1d0 = 1] that being said wolfram doesn't give me anything for 0d(says the number of dice should be a positive integer), i'd still say the result should be zero though because you are rolling zero sided nothing(which only different from a zero sided something by the fact that is nothing, it is still 0 sided)
[16d0 = 16] [1d1+1 = 2] [2d1 = 2] and a few tests i did on moe but not here
...and a few more things that just came to my mind:
could you add the shift JIS art font and the [aa][/aa] selector?(either with the Mona or MS PGothic(MS Pゴシック) fonts(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_(font))), and remember that the line height should be 1.1 on the css for the [aa] rule(at least that is how 8moe has it configured)
a selector [wolf][/wolf] that applies the wolfentsein font to the text with the color 4D5D53(Feldgrau) to be the counterpart of the [doom][/doom] text they have over at 8moe?, and i must say that i would not be opposed to doomtext here as well(i don't lean one way or another for the [moe][/moe] sparkle effect they have there, i mean i don't dislike it but i also wont insist on it being added here)
another selector that changes the text color to 6a1de2 AND shrinks it by the same amount as red text(what you call heading on the help menu) grows it, so reg=1.0em, redtext=1.1em and tinytext=0.9em?(its something 8kun has that here doesn't and since i suggested it on 8kun during the loli fiasco as small text, i see no problem requesting this of you) and id say [t][/t] for tiny text is a good selector
testing (((echoes))) and ///slope\\\(like ((())) but for chinese), and i must say, since you can change the color of the text here, how about also changing the color of its background?(like what those selectors do, at least on 8moe)
testing LaTeX support \LaTeX $$\LaTeX$$ [$]\LaTeX[/$] (i personally think that [$]...[/$] should be the way to go to implement it)
and i think you should link to here trough the ponerpics header(like you do from here to there), although i freely admit that this might be my dumbest request yet
thanks again for your time.
Pupper
## Admin
No.6299
>>6260
Think I got all the bugs with dice roll fixed.
I also added the option to do multiple rolls (up to three rolls).
[2d10-1d6 = (10-4) = 6]

can't post.png
Atlas
Titan
No.1247
Can't Post?
email us at [email protected]
36 replies and 10 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.5195
>>5193
Cuz I have a penis
Anonymous
No.5196
>>5193
Why are you responding to a post from July?
Anonymous
No.5383
test?

mad max.jpg
/QTDDTOT/
Anonymous
No.4126
4127 5102 5301 307546
Questions That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread.

What are the bump limits for each board?
142 replies and 38 files omitted.
Pupper
## Admin
No.6226
6227
>>6220
I assume you talk about the passwords used to create posts. As for now the password used to create posts are not hashed or salted (identical to how it was in vichan/NPFChan). But I can always look into changing that to the code.
One of the cons to doing it this way is that it will make it hard for us to protect against posts being deleted by others, by manually changing them in the database, if people accidentally post screenshots of the password used to make posts (only happened once so far). It would prevent me from changing a specific password and instead I would have to do it for all posts by IP. And the password is not something super critical security issue as it is only used by users if they want to delete the post they made.
But there are some pros to this too so I will do some pondering and discuss with other staffs on what they feel is best.

So summed up the disadvantage if hashing and seeding is that:
* hard to change a single password if accidentally posted screenshot of it
But the advantage hashing and seeding is that:
* If database is leaked no one can delete posts using the password seen in the leak

But I will do some thinking and see if there is a middle way of only doing hashing which would protect against leak and also make it possible to change single passwords (hash).
Anonymous
No.6227
6229
>>6226
>I assume you talk about the passwords used to create posts.
Yes, that's what I meant to say.

I would certainly not like to speak out of turn, and will respect any decisions made by staff, however if I may I'd like to make a brief case for salting and hashing passwords that the moderation team may use as a reference of the opinion of an anon within in the community during their deliberations.
The reason the topic of salted hashes has been brought up was due mainly to the effect, should the password file wind up in the wrong hands, not be able to ID a poster based upon their password; for those maybe not as well versed in how salts or hashing works, basically, as the original password is passed through a hash function, come out as what looks like gibberish on the other side, and any change whatsoever in the original password, be it as small as a single flipped bit, will completely change the outcome of the string on the other side of the hash, effectively scrambling the passwords such that they're not able to be compared to other posts to find someone that's been presumably using the same password to post across the site, and if they were hashed an attacker with the password file would also not be able to go and launch an attack and delete a lot of posts from all kinds of anons all at once, just for an added layer of security practice.
As for deletion of posts with a leaked password, I myself am of the opinion that I don't really mind altogether too much if someone deletes a post of mine should a password be accidentally leaked; it'd be a sacrifice that I think could be worthy, for the added bit of security as a whole.

Cheers.
Anonymous
No.6229
>>6227
>due mainly to the effect ... not be able to ID a poster based upon their password
of not being able to ID
Anonymous
No.6286
6287
903.png
aryanne - blushing.png
Well, if the porn thread won't appall the normies, this will do.
Anonymous
No.6287
>>6286
Oops.
Anonymous
No.6304
Does anyone here have the "Ponk copypasta" that takes the "Pomf pomf" song and changes the lyrics to be about Pinkie Pie?

1589933.png
Aryanne Discord Nuke
Anonymous
No.5963
6302
As you all know by now, the Aryanne Thread Discord has been nuked, and all members of that server had their accounts disabled.
From what I understand, the /mlpol/ staff communicate largely through discord. I made my account more than three years ago for the purpose of communicating with the staff.
Have any members of the staff had their staffing accounts disabled?
Does the /mlpol/ have any contingiency of communication in case discord becomes unreliable?
2 replies and 0 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.5967
5968
>>5966
Using a based encrypted service that respects free speech and privacy is the only thing that makes sense.
Anonymous
No.5968
>>5967
Alright, I'm already looking for alternatives in gaming.

I meant in context of the /mlpol/ staff though.
Anonymous
No.5969
My Little Pony - Rarity - Thinking.png
Check this post out >>>/mlpol/309572 →
May be a solution.
Anonymous
No.5970
6303
Okay, it has come to my knowledge that only one member of the staff had their discord disabled.
Anonymous
No.6302
6303
>>5963
>Going on Discord
Anonymous
No.6303
>>6302
>Responding to month old posts and bumping month old threads.
>>5970
Turns out actually a lot more staff had their accounts killed, and several of them appear to have lost contact with the rest of the staff.

Seething.png
Anonymous
ae51256
?
No.6298
Looks like the ziggers at soyjak party are planning to spam on the weekend. Will any mods online then?
Anonymous
fb6382e
?
No.6301
I doubt it'll be a problem.

20210713_212721.jpg
What Are The Rules (pt 2)
Anonymous
4d5f88a
?
No.6288
6289 6291 6294
Keep at it. It totally wont blow up in your face
4 replies and 2 files omitted.
Anonymous
8f5c1c0
?
No.6293
huey+lewi.png
_open+.png
>>6292
I'm a mental health enthusiast.
I'll be as judgemental as I damn well please because I'm not staff in any way shape or form.
If that changes somehow for some reason the answer is as an Anon that is my personal opinion of the current situation.
Nigel has issues and so do you. I wouldn't trust myself with that kind of administrative control over Anons so in any case I'd leave it be to handle clear cut actions in odd time areas.
Anonymous
9c682b8
?
No.6294
6295
9f5.jpg
>>6288
It's just a pop-up with a message/warning. Not a big deal faggot.
Just do as told and keep shitposting. It has no merit to open a thread.
Anonymous
4d5f88a
?
No.6295
6296
>>6294
So, your user-generated advise is that I disregard moderator actions and then proceed.
That seems actionable. Tks ^_^
Anonymous
9c682b8
?
No.6296
1852.png
c18.png
>>6295
Anonymous
4d5f88a
?
No.6297
>just do as told
Hard no
Anonymous
de38bc6
?
No.6300
>>6290
>opsec
Why does this term keep popping up on this board?

whatyoujustposted.png
Screenshot (161).png
Screenshot (162).png
Screenshot (163).png
/mlpol/ Policy Page and FAQ Discussion
Anonymous
No.5810
5811 5822 5829 5835 5870 5877 6254
With the revelations in these past couple days, it's become quite clear that the current /mlpol/ policy page is out of date and misleading, even intentionally so.
The most misleading statements is in the FAQ:
>What staff has administrative access to the server, and why?
>Atlas: super sexy owner of mlpol.net former /pol/lack, access because yes
This statement is untrue and misleading. Atlas is not the owner of /mlpol/ and has not been for some time now. This really should have been announced prior to the happening, but that's a separate discussion.

It is not acceptable to leave misleading information about the boards page, because it makes adequate transparency and community input impossible, so it really needs to be fixed as soon as reasonably possible. However, changing it is a very serious issue that warrants community discussion on the matter, so let's talk about what the policy board says, what anyone thinks it should say, and how it should be stated.

For starters, the topic above also relates to the staff rules, particularly rules #2:
>2. Staff will maintain a level of transparency with the community
This rule seemed clear enough when it was written, but now it seems as though it lacks specificity and is open to very liberal interpretation. The definition of transparency is easy enough to understand, but the wording "a level of transparency" is evidently vaguer than it seemed. According to recent revelations, informing the community about a change in ownership was not considered to be within that level of transparency, and leaving blatantly untrue statements on the policy page was deemed to be acceptable under said policy.

So the questions are is:
>What exactly is the staff's standard of transparency in regards to what the board deserves to know?
>What kinds of information are considered to be open to the community?
>How is the standard of transparency maintained and enforced, and what is the decision making process for revealing something or leaving it secret?
>What members of staff are responsible/accountable for making sure that the operations and issues concerning /mlpol/'s structure and community are disclosed to the public?
>On what basis is the community able to confidently trust that the staff is being honest and transparent with them, and how are users able to confirm this other than taking the policy page at face value?
>Does the /mlpol/ staff consider it necessary to inform the community about big changes in staffing, policy, ownership of the board or operations before they occur, or only after the matter?
>In the event that it occurs, do the staff have any policies concerning "sensitive" information deemed too risky to expose? (perhaps things such as personal information and doxxable data)

In addition, rule #2 outlines committments to the community made by the staff, but reveal very, very little about how the staff make decisions amongst themselves, how the staff is managed, and most importantly, how the staff policies are enforced. The Staff policy does mention some things thing in regards to rules are enforced and says in four places that staff found to break the rules face "punitive measures" up to immediate dismissal. Now, several of those lines are as-written described as zero-tolerance policies, but that is also questionable, because although rule #1 #3 and #4 serious and clear enough to call for those measures, rule #2 is, apparently, vague enough to be open to interpretation and has even be observably broken and disregarded either through premeditated intent or negligence before. Earlier discussions brought up the issue that zero tolerance policies might put persons on the defensive and potentially harm transparency. There are surely degrees of accountability between doing nothing and outright expulsion, but those degrees are not defined anywhere.

So, questions arise from that:
>How exactly does the /mlpol/ staff discipline itself?
>Are there degrees by which staff consider and account for alleged misconduct?
>Who is/are the final arbiter(s) for considering if/when actions by the staff violate the letter or spirit of the rules?
>How can the users of the board confidently trust that staff are accountable for inappropriate behavior?
>How do the staff con

The complications with rule #2 also proppose issues with rule #3:
>3. Staff will take all community suggestions into account
>As this is a community site and not a top-down dictatorship like some other sites user input is very important
Rule #3 is in essence contingent on the proper application of rule #2, because transparency is necessary for healthy site user input, and site user input is indeed very, very, very important because it distinguishes /mlpol/ from other chans where talking this stuff on /qa/ for weeks on end doesn't actually produce any long-term results. The community cannot voice it's opinions on matters if they are not punctually made aware of them, let alone if the policy page misleads them.
So, questions arise from that:
>Aside from merely using the board, how are the staff able to ensure that their decisions represent the will of the community?
>How, and through what mediums, does the staff make sure that community considerations are taken into account and fascilitate user input?
>On what matters is community consideration deemed to be necessary in decision making?
>How often does the staff seek out direct user input on matters of any kind?
179 replies and 40 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.6280
6281
HoodieShybyJustaninnocentPony1461960540112.png
Hello everyponer, I'm back.
If you poners allow me, This silly argument about the policy page is a storm in a teapot.
Just knock this caprice off and let everyponer back in business.
If you don't mind.
Anonymous
No.6281
6282
>>6280
I'm not really trying to argue here. I'm still trying to figure out what Anon is talking about.
Anonymous
No.6282
6283
>>6281
>I'm still trying to figure out what Anon is talking about.
To OP and supporters.
Anonymous
No.6283
6284
>>6282
I am OP. I don't know what you mean about "supporters" because I haven't really called for anything.
Anonymous
No.6284
6285
1624986366343.png
>>6283
>I am OP. I don't know what you mean about "supporters" because I haven't really called for anything.
Anonymous
No.6285
dac.jpg
>>6284
>I can't communicate like an grown man, so here's this meme

1625590985.jpg
Anonymous
598ce19
?
No.6237
6238 6243
Ninjas has got to go, boys. No more half measures. It's time to show some follow through. I hate to be the one to have to say this, but it's been time.

Pic unrelated.
Only post made by this user
1 replies and 0 files omitted.
Anonymous
63a56c5
?
No.6239
PicrelatedOP.png
OPmighttakethiscoltsload.png
ABC.jpg
Why?
Anonymous
1be1dea
?
No.6240
Oh right. Its totally believable that a 1 time poster just happened to name-drop and enable IDs on a /qa/ thread. It couldnt possibly be someone with an axe to grind, using a vpn.
Anonymous
5931a09
?
No.6243
7f4e9.gif
>>6237
>Ninjas has got to go
I missed this one.
John Elway
## HorseWhisperer
0000000
?
No.6244
File (hide): 5438C48830338335E4B2AB2C8A99564B-18366847.webm (17.5 MB, Resolution:320x240 Length:00:04:10, nobody k-k-k-kares.webm) [play once] [loop]
nobody k-k-k-kares.webm
>this thread
Anonymous
2528aac
?
No.6245
Ninjas hasn't been on the staff for almost a year. What even is this thread?
Anonymous
c25186c
?
No.6249
>Only post made by this user
You guys are killing me here. Really?

901072.jpg
Bump Limits
Anonymous
No.5974
5981 5987
Has anyone else had the feeling like the bump limits on this site are too high? They're much higher than those of other sites like /pol/ and /mlp/. On /mlpol/ threads stay up for years at a time, and I feel like it's broken the spirit of our old "no generals" policy. Maybe it would be healthier for discussion to have lower bump limits and simply have Anons make new threads when old ones hit their limit, to prevent stagnation.
I think they've been extended twice before since the start of this site on request by some Anons who were in certain long-standing threads, but i feel like that might have been detrimental in the long term.
28 replies and 3 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.6214
>>6210
Fair enough. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
Anonymous
No.6215
6216
>>6213
>What did we gain
What did we lost?
Anonymous
No.6216
6218
>>6215
We lost the feeling of having normal sized threads on our board.
What was the benefit though? Why did we do it in the first place.
Anonymous
No.6218
6219
>>6216
>We lost the feeling
>feeling
It's an opinion founded on a subjective wimp.
Anonymous
No.6219
>>6218
Do you not notice the difference?
Anonymous
No.6221
changellings.jpg


1519197724696.png
Anonymous
No.4080
4085 4665
How do red text?
113 replies and 6 files omitted.
Anonymous
No.6191
6192
[cycle 000]Friendship[/cycle]
[shift 000]Friendship[/shift]
Anonymous
No.6192
>>6191
[cycle #000]Friendship >>6191
[/cycle]
[shift #000]Friendship >>6191
[/shift]
Anonymous
No.6204
6205
:applejack:
howdy
Anonymous
No.6205
6206
>>6204
:jar: Sup poner.
Anonymous
No.6206
>>6205
:iwtci-aj-pussy:
Anonymous
No.6230
>>>/mlpol/310462 →

Previous  [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]  Next