/qa/ - Questions and Answers

>>8252
Good luck and may you not repeat the same arc as with me. Maybe try to be nice to Elway so you don't end up back here and begging people to allow your spam.

>>8254
>Good luck and may you not repeat the same arc as with me.
I'm the oppressed here in case you forgot. I tried before to move aside and all my threads in /1ntr/ were nuked, even when I have permission to post them. I never receive any apologies and reparations for the affront.

>>8255
>I'm the oppressed here
Nigger, you can fuck off with your delusions of persecution. Go run back to your Facebook feed if you feel so bullied here.
>apologies and reparations
Kill yourself.

>>8255
Your threads do not belong in /1ntr/. You just don't get it all these months later. Your threads are spam. Your threads break the rules. You were asked to leave /1ntr/ by the users because it didn't fit.

Surprising, I know, but you don't get to just do whatever. You were asked to change or compromise your style, you told me to fuck myself. I will never apologize to you and your shit content you copy from others on the internet that do the actual work. You take this deal and be at the mercy of Elway, or I will deal with you here. Your pick.

>>8255
>oy vey stop oppressing meeeeee
You're off to a great start already. I look forward to working with you.

>>8257
>You take this deal and be at the mercy of Elway, or I will deal with you here. Your pick.
>>8258
>I look forward to working with you.
Great. It's a conspiracy now.

>>8259
Oh no! The site is set up against you!
I guess you have no choice but to pack up and search for greener pastures. Perhaps a new Facebook group, or a subreddit will do.

>>8259
>oy vey it's a conspeeeeeeeeracy
lol, why not just chillax my dude?

>>8260
Dream on.

>>8261
>chillax
I'm chill. I'm going to order something for dinner. See ya all later.

>>8262
>claims to be oppressed
>stays anyway
Wow, you sound like a battered wife.

>this stupid drama
Don’t mind me, just moving files from my phone to my laptop

I'm the anon that was complaining about family a while back. The township's Democrat party sent out a newsletter last week (my dad is a dem), and it was listing a bunch of complaints of corruption from a particular GOP councilman. I think this is the same man that we ran afoul with in 2017; long story short, he started some big fiasco that lasted an entire year over the terrible state of our home, after possibly illegally trespassing into it, and that probably happened without the township's knowledge since he was apparently doing all sorts of other stuff under their noses. The incident is the big reason why my family has been so messed up (I think I only mentioned it in passing once, there's too much stuff to go over). They didn't want to seek legal action because they're still retards in the end. I wasn't physically present for most of it since I was working at the time, so I doubt there was much I could do.

I had the thought of telling my story to the dems so I could open up some sort of avenue for legal action or at least receive some sort of guidance on how to proceed with this. However, it's very possible that their accusations are full of shit and getting them involved might make a big mess. Incidentally, one of the dem councilmen running for these upcoming elections is my former science teacher from high school, who got fired in my senior year for allegedly sharing answers on standardized tests or something; I don't think I ever got the full story, only rumors. Acting without seeking any advice in a situation like this sounds immensely retarded even for the son of anon's family.

>>8459
I wish I could help, but I am not qualified to give advice on families, let alone political struggles of an entire town involving corruption and legal action. All I can say is that it sounds like your best action is to try to leave one day to somewhere less insane. I hope you will do well in the meantime.

This Mongolian Karaoke was down without warning. What happened?

>>8532
Sorry ya'll when the buck broke it dun tripped into the digitahl an' ya'll know a buck runnin' around makes a mess of things.
Had to use some ol' bloodline Buck Breaking techniques an' the silly-cons just broke.
Then just had to go even further to break the breaking.
Ya'll know how buck breaking gets when it's serious.

>>8533
>obfuscation
So cute.

>>8534
No I was shit posting, I'm just an anonymous shitposter and I have nothing to do with the server in anyway shape or form.
Besides the whole buck breaking incident.
So stop making assumptions.

>>8535
>Besides the whole buck breaking incident.
Huh? I wanna know moar.

>>8536
No can do Hoss. You're a Buck Breaker or you're not.
Yah could be a buck.
Every Buck Breaker knows the twenty seven Buck Breaking incidents. Not even counting the extended editions, encoded editions and bloodline editions.
It's ain't easy. No it ain't.
Unless you got ties to a Buck Breaker by the tenth break, I'm not allowed to read yah in.
An' a Buck Breaker got the ties already. Unless your mentorship ended by events of death or tragedy or the rare case one-one is out of my hands.
The most I can give is the public version of events.
I'll see if those can't be snagged from the Breaker shelf.
Can't promise anything concrete.
It's a stretch might try altering parts of director's cut.

>>8536
Bucks were broken. I'll spare you the details.

>>8537
>Unless you got ties to a Buck Breaker by the tenth break, I'm not allowed to read yah in.
>>8538
>Bucks were broken. I'll spare you the details.
Well, I guess I'm not asking any moar.

How do you justify being zoophiles and pedophiles when claiming to espouse white nationalism?
frenschan tier honeypot

>>8544
>Zoophiles
Horses are white.
>pedo
Lies and slander.

>>8545
>ponies are huwhite
Not that I care. But even if it were true, it goes well beyond ponies. I've seen gryphon lovers here.

>>8546
I haven't seen griffon posters in a while. They're marginal.

>>8547
That's not all. It was high profile. Also a DnD dood.

>>8548
When?

>>8548
I haven't seen any of that in a long time, and I frequent the overboard on this site every day. Little griffon posting in the past several years. You must be thinking of something a LONG time ago. If it were prevalent, I would have seen it. Moreover, the d&d posters barely post any images, so for you to say that there was a prevalent griffon poster in those threads implies that you either closely lurked those threads and/or were a member of them...
Are you Zald?

>>8544
LOL

>>8550
Who said anything about prevalence? I said it was high profile, meaning the user in question is a regular. It was an admin.
>Are you Zald?
Nope. But what an odd question to make.

>>8552
Tell me how I know your IQ, your history and the depths of brain cancer you're trying to spread.

>>8553
Why are you so defensive anon? Are you the degenerate admin?

>>8552
How do you know that? Can you point it out?

>>8555
Is that what you want? I personally don't care. Nothing could taint my opinion of him, more than it already is. But if you want, I can put some time to it. /vx/ threads are messy.

>>8556
I just haven't seen any griffons posted anywhere in a long time, so I find it hard to believe your assertion that it's a pervasive issue, as you implied in >>8544 >>8546
And you said "griffon lovers" plural, when it's questionable if there's even a single one still around.
And to relate it to your question, griffon posters hardly imply zoophiles, because griffons are fictional creatures and posting about them has very little basis in reality.
Not sure what your point is here.

>>8556
>Is that what you want?
>I can put some time to it
Well, you did raise the issue and start the discussion, so you may as well elaborate on it.

>>8557
>so I find it hard to believe your assertion that it's a pervasive issue, as you implied in
I see what's going on now. I'm not the same anon. I never said anything about zoophiles. My ID did change here tho. [This post is mine >>8556]
>And you said "griffon lovers" plural
True, it might have only been the admin.
>>8558
Okay. I'll see if I can find it later today. I don't think it's a big issue, but some poners may differ. The guy got called out for it and his response was something along the lines of:
>"If you haven't tasted the pie, you can't judge it's flavor."

>>8559
If it has nothing to do with zoophiles, why did you bring it up in response to that?
It's only normal to have a handful of posters posting about griffons on a pony forum.

>>8560
He called you zoophiles because you liked ponies in a sexual way. You said ponies are white. Well, this guy liked gryphons in a sexual way too.
Chillax dude.

>>8561
>not liking gryphons in a sexual way
Now that's just antisemitic.

>>8562
A cat-bird is fine too.

>>8562
It's fine if you do. I don't really care. There's all sorts of kinks and sexual fetishes out there. We mustn't judge people over it.
I'm only mentioning the incident because it might be useful for Anon. We're all seeking the truth in the end.

>>8565
My ID changed again.

>>8565
So you're just shitting up the place for no reason then?
Yoy haven't to pointed to anything.
You haven't made the board better by any of your posts.
You haven't raised any thought engaging posts.
You're just saying shit.
What the fuck is your major malfunction.
So Why did you bring it up?

>>8567
>What the fuck is your major malfunction.
My pony senses are pointing at an individual, very likely a woman, doing a pseudo research for gibs.

>>8567
I already explained why I brought it up.
>Yoy haven't to pointed to anything.
Are you having a seizure just now?
>You haven't made the board better by any of your posts.
>You haven't raised any thought engaging posts.
>(you)
>(you)
>(you)
This is an anonymous board, anon.
>What the fuck is your major malfunction.
Knowing how to type coherent posts. Sorry bro, but it's not contagious. ^^
>>8569
Your pony senses are far too paranoid.

>>8570
>Your pony senses are far too paranoid
Pony senses are exquisite to detect the femoid stench.

>>8572
>Pony senses are exquisite to detect the femoid stench.
It drives women away. That's for sure.

>>8569
What research?

>>8572
Tbh, it doesn't look like that to me.

>>8565
>it might be useful for Anon
Useful for what? I don't get it.

Around 10 fags at Movie Night, just one cared to post at /mlpol/
Curiously, there are always a couple ready to jump at regular posters to bully them into silence...
You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.

>>8578
Wow it's almost like watching stuff is the core engagement and not just shit posting.

>>8578
>You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.
What are you even talking about?
>bully them
>them
>implying
I (and other posters) bully (You), singular, because your posts fucking suck, and then (You) play the victim in threads like this when people show any resistance to your sewage because (You) can't handle the bantz. (You) know why I can tell it's always (You)? Because your posting style hasn't improved since the day (You) arrived here; if anything, your posts have gotten worse as (You) let your ego get to (You).
And for the record, I make tons of posts on this site. I also regularly make new threads, unlike (You) who only bumps your shitty generals with crap nopony asked for. I have 25 threads on the catalog, only one of which could be considered a "general", so your bullshit claim about posters who dislike your posts not posting themselves is completely moot. Since the beginning of this site I've made it my duty to make sure mlpol.net had content even on months where the number of posters dropped to single digits in the early days of this site before recovering. I used all kinds of tactics, from fetching better-quality threads from 8chan, to fishing for posters, to reaching out to artists on discord to do art dumps, to sockpuppeting conversations when I got desperate; but I never, ever resorted to flooding it with crappy boomer-tier sewage posts for the sake of posting. I try to make my threads quality, although it pains me when I see my threads devolve into garbage as (You) treat them like generals and bump them with vaguely-related news posts instead of making your own goddamn threads.
I'm also one of 2-3 posters who even bothers to reply to your crappy generals on /sp/ and start conversations; and (You) get bent out of shape every time just because I dared to sage them (I don't bump generals. (You) can bump them yourself if (You) want), because apparently that makes a difference.

And for the record, I don't usually attend movie night. I do keep contact with the off-site community though, and I know no less than 3 posters who've said they don't bother to post to this site anymore because they're tired of your sewage all over the board; I can't really blame them, because when I look at the recent posts on this site it looks worse than 4chan on some days because of your garbage. And yet (You) go "woe is me, I don't have anyone left to play with", after years of covering the board with liquid shit and relentlessly antagonizing posters that have been here since the beginning of the site; and now (You) ironically tell the rest of the site to lie in the bed they made. Top zozzle.

But go ahead and continue feeling sorry for yourself and blaming everyone else who uses the site.

>>8578
>You dumbasses made the bed, now own it.
You say that like it's only our problem, when it's only you who's complaining about it.
But let me guess, you're going to continue posting anyway on the site you claim is dead?

>>8580
>deflecting and gaslighting
(You) are not righteous sir.

>>8581
>But let me guess, you're going to continue posting anyway on the site you claim is dead?
It is not about me, but (you).
(YOU) and frens are not posting enough.

>>8582
You don't even know what gaslighting means. What part of that is gaslighting? I'm just calling out your niggerdry and scoffing at your attention-hungry calls for sympathy.
>>8583
>26 threads on the catalog
Oh yeah, I'm totally not posting enough.
I guess i'll just make a shitty meme dump thread and bump it every couple hours with Facebook sewage instead.

>>8584
>26 threads on the catalog
What about your entitled frens, huh?

>8585
They make their own threads at a steady rate, unlike you who only bumps your awful generals.
>(You) meme
That's rich coming from the nigger who's complaining about lack of activity.

>>8586
I've got work to do. See ya later.
Have another (you).

@8583
@8585
>cropping the same reaction image twice
What a quality poster you are.

>>8589
>@8583
>@8585
>@
>@
Ew, a phonefag.

>8587
>loses argument
>conveniently has to go to work
Topkek. This is the at least the third time you've done this.
>8590
I thought you were at work?

@8590
>implying

>>8580
(You) are righteous sir.
>>8583
It is about you because you disregard everyone else making every board on this website more like a garbage dump.
>just make more good things so I can cover it all with my trash
How about you stop making trash so we can just have nice things.
>But muh 50k posts a minute
Fuck you and your grabage spewing bullshit. Stop it.
<Here's a Poll Reply to this post
Show of Posts who enjoys your stuff post in green "I Enjoy Those Posts".
Why specifically you like it would be appreciated because there is no reasons at the moment.
Show of Posts who enjoys your stuff post in red "I Don't Enjoy Those Posts".

Why? Because if there's anybody who really fucking likes your stuff I'd like to know why.
Don't Same Fag.

>>8593
Relax faget. You barely use this site.

>>8591
>conveniently has to go to work
>Topkek. This is the at least the third time you've done this.
You know, mom is no giving me any hay, so I have to work for it. I know, work is an alien thought to (you).

>8595
Then maybe manage your time better before entering internet arguments.

>8594
>You barely use this site.
I recognize his posting style. He posts here plenty. Maybe you didn't notice it because it wasn't a discussion-free meme dump.

>>8599
>I recognize his posting style.
So? There is barely shitposting around. If there is a style, it cannot be seen.

>8600
>cannot be seen
You must be blind then, because I see it clearly.
There are dozens of Anons who post to this board. Just because they don't bump your generals every day doesn't mean they're not present. You complain about them not posting enough while you actively discourage content creators by flooding the board with whatever garbage Zuckerberg permits you to consume.
You don't even post ponies for real. You just take pics out a reaction image folder you downloaded from somewhere on the net (which I can tell because of lack of 4chan filenames) and smugpost with them, without ever actually talking about ponies. I don't believe you ever even used /mlp/ before this board.

>>8601
>the serial sagger
Save your contempt, it is getting too far and is affecting (you).

>8602
That post wasn't even saged, you nitwit.

Also, when did saging become a problem? It's essential on /pol/.
This fucking insolent newfag has no idea how chan culture works.

>8605
Oh, what, did I hit a nerve?
You've been here for less than 4 years, and probably never even used 4chan before that. This board has declined in quality since you started posting because you refused to lurk and instead just went right away to dumping your garbage en-mass.

>8607
Lol, butthurt

>>8608
>Cactus Filly
Reeeeeeeeeeeee.

Merry Christmas everypony.
/mlpol/'s interface had a snowy revamp for Christmas and is awesome. However it may in some systems to use excessive CPU cycles to render it, the solution is a check mark away to disable it.
Have a comfy hoer Christmas.

>>8610
Unless you're still running a core 2 duo, I doubt you can even notice any performance issues.

>>8611
>core 2 duo
I'm not sure how well my AMD performs against the Intel one, but the performance hit is noticeable.

>>8623
It does seem comparable to most core2duo CPU's in single core performance. But it is still a quad-core. I run an old Celeron, but I didn't expected anyone to be running shit hardware too.
But hey, maybe it doesn't have amd's PSP. If you know, you know.

>>8624
>but I didn't expected anyone to be running shit hardware too.
Wait to see my still working 14 years-old flip-phone.

>>8625
You browse /mlpol/ on a 14 year old flip phone? Why?

>>8628
My point: I am NOT a phonefag by any means.
Phones are devices to teletalk, that's it.

>>8630
Okay, but what's that to do with running shit hardware?
>Phones are devices to teletalk
Eh, I beg to differ. Phones are useful for a lot of things.
I still prefer to browse /mlpol/ on my desktop though.
That's a topic for another thread though.

>>8631
>but what's that to do with running shit hardware?
Everything. Antiques have their place too.

>>8631
>Phones are useful for a lot of things.
Only if you buy into the not requested "exciting new functionalities".

>>8634
>not requested "exciting new functionalities"
Pretty sure people requested computers that they could carry with them.

>>8635
>fake portable computers
Do not confuse them with electronic leashes larping as "computers".

>>8636
A computer is a computer.
This is a topic for >>>/cyb/

>>8637
Agree.