most /mlpol/ activity happens on these threads or threads like these making them stay on the frontpage while the good pony threads fall down the catalog. ponies are being replaced by tourist non-pony lover threads. there was a healthy income of ponies and balance between pony
threads and non-pony threads but now ponies are becoming the minority.
>>344150 →
>>349126 →
>>335835 →
>>350658 →
>>352880 →
>>350009 →
>>333789 →
we must secure the existence of our board and a future for white ponies
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 0F5B00BF6E3CC72747A0ABA1CCC4F083-302419.png (295.3 KB, 3650x2500, 393221.png)
>>353661
>most /mlpol/ activity happens on these threads or threads
Because there is autism enough to keep them going, so simple like that.
If you want more pony, post more pony. Complaining about /pol/ activity is kinda zigger tier.
>most /mlpol/ activity happens on these threads or threads
Because there is autism enough to keep them going, so simple like that.
If you want more pony, post more pony. Complaining about /pol/ activity is kinda zigger tier.
>>353661
By the way, spamming pony threads to later abandon them for lack of enough autism won't help.
By the way, spamming pony threads to later abandon them for lack of enough autism won't help.
>>353661
I would like to point out that all but two of the threads mentioned in the OP lack poster IDs, and as such the quality of discussion has really deteriorated.
Poster IDs are essential for /pol/ threads. We made the option to remove them for the sake of pony threads.
I would like to point out that all but two of the threads mentioned in the OP lack poster IDs, and as such the quality of discussion has really deteriorated.
Poster IDs are essential for /pol/ threads. We made the option to remove them for the sake of pony threads.
>>353661
I think the best one could do is simply engage more with pony threads. This site is barely clinging to life and will continue dying, so I'd just try to enjoy it while it lasts.
I think the best one could do is simply engage more with pony threads. This site is barely clinging to life and will continue dying, so I'd just try to enjoy it while it lasts.
File (): D9E2B7695BB952064EA851EE097BB9A6-609522.png (595.2 KB, 691x1024, aryanneponyposts.png)
>>353672
And they insist it "levels the playing field" against shills. But I can confirm it's rather easier to shit up a thread without ID's. Not sure how it was supposed to make it any harder.
And they insist it "levels the playing field" against shills. But I can confirm it's rather easier to shit up a thread without ID's. Not sure how it was supposed to make it any harder.
>>353683
>they insist it "levels the playing field" against shills.
That's not even close to true.
>it's rather easier to shit up a thread without ID's.
Exactly. Especially when retards pull stupid double-speak, agree with themselves, or post mutually-exclusive claims.
Not only that, the "generals" made without poster IDs suck up all of the discussion related to their very broad topics, which was bad in the first place, but it's even worse now that the generals almost exclusively have no poster IDs since that means conversations go there to die. Rule 11 discourages posters from making their own threads with IDs if the thread's topic falls within one of the generals, so the overall effect is a lowering of discussion quality on the board.
Poster IDs were made for a reason. They're a staple of /pol/ discussion (one of the more unique aspects of /pol/ on 4chan). The removing option was a compromise made to encourage /mlp/ threads (although we still haven't given OPs the option to hide all flags in their threads).
There should be some unwritten policy/etiquette that discourages making /pol/ threads without IDs. ID-less threads are for ponies.
>they insist it "levels the playing field" against shills.
That's not even close to true.
>it's rather easier to shit up a thread without ID's.
Exactly. Especially when retards pull stupid double-speak, agree with themselves, or post mutually-exclusive claims.
Not only that, the "generals" made without poster IDs suck up all of the discussion related to their very broad topics, which was bad in the first place, but it's even worse now that the generals almost exclusively have no poster IDs since that means conversations go there to die. Rule 11 discourages posters from making their own threads with IDs if the thread's topic falls within one of the generals, so the overall effect is a lowering of discussion quality on the board.
Poster IDs were made for a reason. They're a staple of /pol/ discussion (one of the more unique aspects of /pol/ on 4chan). The removing option was a compromise made to encourage /mlp/ threads (although we still haven't given OPs the option to hide all flags in their threads).
There should be some unwritten policy/etiquette that discourages making /pol/ threads without IDs. ID-less threads are for ponies.
I had considered making a /qa/ thread about this, but didn't bother because it seems like every thread there in the past two years turns to shit immediately. Glad that somebody brought it up.
File (): 3F745DF80721567F3F39C2D97E56EFDF-291421.png (284.6 KB, 720x720, 3F745DF80721567F3F39C2D97E56EFDF-291421.png)
File (): 53AE21F34763F40FB267B294331157B8-2597820.png (2.5 MB, 900x1278, 53AE21F34763F40FB267B294331157B8-2597820.png)
>>353685
>>353686
I'm pretty sure since this is a community driven site and the numerous /qa/ threads, about the same topic that's been discussed multiple times, a soltuion is to just post the damn important news/thread in the first place if it's important/lots of discussion/communityfun enough.
If it dies it dies. Else it goes where is supposed to go. Doesn't shit stuff up. Ect.
>>353662
>>353663
>If you want more pony, post more pony. Complaining about /pol/ activity is kinda zigger tier.
>By the way, spamming pony threads to later abandon them for lack of enough autism won't help.
Absolutely.
Make a green text thread, a mare thread, a pony pony thread, a snowpitty thread, a thread where mares have to be posted to spell out M A R E or something. (You) can make a great thread maybe even the best.
Sometimes it flops because that's life, and sometimes it soars, and sometimes other circumstances are in play.
>>353686
I'm pretty sure since this is a community driven site and the numerous /qa/ threads, about the same topic that's been discussed multiple times, a soltuion is to just post the damn important news/thread in the first place if it's important/lots of discussion/communityfun enough.
If it dies it dies. Else it goes where is supposed to go. Doesn't shit stuff up. Ect.
>>353662
>>353663
>If you want more pony, post more pony. Complaining about /pol/ activity is kinda zigger tier.
>By the way, spamming pony threads to later abandon them for lack of enough autism won't help.
Absolutely.
Make a green text thread, a mare thread, a pony pony thread, a snowpitty thread, a thread where mares have to be posted to spell out M A R E or something. (You) can make a great thread maybe even the best.
Sometimes it flops because that's life, and sometimes it soars, and sometimes other circumstances are in play.
>>353694
>Make a green text thread, a mare thread, a pony pony thread, a snowpitty thread, a thread where mares have to be posted to spell out M A R E or something
Yup. They post some pony thread and let it die. At least "general /pol/ threads" are consistent and continuous. It is not /pol/'s fault that /mlp/ fags are low energy.
>Make a green text thread, a mare thread, a pony pony thread, a snowpitty thread, a thread where mares have to be posted to spell out M A R E or something
Yup. They post some pony thread and let it die. At least "general /pol/ threads" are consistent and continuous. It is not /pol/'s fault that /mlp/ fags are low energy.
The solution is simple
sage the non-pony threads
make the non-pony threads into pony threads
flood board with pony threads, reply to all pony threads
declare pony ethnostate
sage the non-pony threads
make the non-pony threads into pony threads
flood board with pony threads, reply to all pony threads
declare pony ethnostate
>>353703
It sounds a good idea. But I have one even better. Why instead of focusing and blaming /pol/ threads, put all that energy and frustration on /mlp/ threads to making them more active and more autistic?
It sounds a good idea. But I have one even better. Why instead of focusing and blaming /pol/ threads, put all that energy and frustration on /mlp/ threads to making them more active and more autistic?
>>353706
I do both indeed. When I've got bored of shitposting /pol/, I usually finish my journey by bumping an abandoned "general" pony bread, because the lazy poners won't do it. See: Epona, Leslie, Cute Poners, Rarity.
I do both indeed. When I've got bored of shitposting /pol/, I usually finish my journey by bumping an abandoned "general" pony bread, because the lazy poners won't do it. See: Epona, Leslie, Cute Poners, Rarity.
>>353696
I'm a /pol/fag. I'm just tired of the low-quality /pol/ generals without IDs smothering discussion.
I'm a /pol/fag. I'm just tired of the low-quality /pol/ generals without IDs smothering discussion.
>>353717
>coup
/mlp/ is slow enough already. Remove the gay tranny threads and it's even slower. Though I'm sure each of us Nazi horsefuckers possess a potent degree of autism as individuals, we're too few in number to sustain enough quality pony to keep things moving.
/mlpol/ can't remain solvent without both /mlp/ and /pol/, no matter how hard shit-flinging spergs might try to fracture our glorious and harmonious union.
We a need a mare renaissance more than infighting. You should step up and be our Marist Mussolini.
>coup
/mlp/ is slow enough already. Remove the gay tranny threads and it's even slower. Though I'm sure each of us Nazi horsefuckers possess a potent degree of autism as individuals, we're too few in number to sustain enough quality pony to keep things moving.
/mlpol/ can't remain solvent without both /mlp/ and /pol/, no matter how hard shit-flinging spergs might try to fracture our glorious and harmonious union.
We a need a mare renaissance more than infighting. You should step up and be our Marist Mussolini.
File (): D5D6579D6C88CCFD2AEB709D646CF21D-292576.png (285.7 KB, 634x428, D5D6579D6C88CCFD2AEB709D646CF21D-292576.png)
>>353727
The Hi Anon posting was limp. Quick shots don't please mares as much as skilled, long ride, redpilled, kekking, shitposts.
It left the mares wanting a real Anon, thats why they went to the Football himself.
You can do it, it takes some practice maybe an effort post or five, but I believe it's possible.
The Hi Anon posting was limp. Quick shots don't please mares as much as skilled, long ride, redpilled, kekking, shitposts.
It left the mares wanting a real Anon, thats why they went to the Football himself.
You can do it, it takes some practice maybe an effort post or five, but I believe it's possible.
>>353731
Just one user posting repeatable content isn't much more than artificial post count. You are correct, it isn't against any rule. However, suppose I reply to this 20 times with a pony picture each time? Is that content? This is why the majority were moved, as it is allowed, but it isn't anything but empty content if you don't make something that is engaged with.
Just one user posting repeatable content isn't much more than artificial post count. You are correct, it isn't against any rule. However, suppose I reply to this 20 times with a pony picture each time? Is that content? This is why the majority were moved, as it is allowed, but it isn't anything but empty content if you don't make something that is engaged with.
>>353733
>artificial
Post count is post count. There is no artificial unless bots are involved.
>suppose I reply to this 20 times with a pony picture each time? Is that content?
Yes. Mares are content. Post mares.
>artificial
Post count is post count. There is no artificial unless bots are involved.
>suppose I reply to this 20 times with a pony picture each time? Is that content?
Yes. Mares are content. Post mares.
>>353733
>but it isn't anything but empty content if you don't make something that is engaged with.
>not something that is engaged with.
To be fair, there are quite a bunch of threads on the catalog that fit the description.
>but it isn't anything but empty content if you don't make something that is engaged with.
>not something that is engaged with.
To be fair, there are quite a bunch of threads on the catalog that fit the description.
>>353737
Yeah, at least with the Hi Anon threads we got pictures of mares.
They're no harm. Sliding months-old threads off the catalog is an improvement overall.
Yeah, at least with the Hi Anon threads we got pictures of mares.
They're no harm. Sliding months-old threads off the catalog is an improvement overall.
File (): E6EC1E6956538C19B82817D91A4552E7-824010.gif (804.7 KB, 600x334, ub5d4a8fa07.gif)
The uprising of the jealous poners.
Just checking in to say that threads like these are demoralizing for people like me who actually create pony content. How about you give me some (you)s and reflective responses with your time instead.
Nothing will come of these threads anyway.
On that note, the mantra that the site is "dying" won't make things better.
What does it matter if it dies, if there is no "content" anyway?
Nothing will come of these threads anyway.
On that note, the mantra that the site is "dying" won't make things better.
What does it matter if it dies, if there is no "content" anyway?
>>353746
It appears that a single, lone shill might have motivated this reaction.
Tho it seems like an unintended consequence.
>>353462 →
>>>/sp/20445 →
It appears that a single, lone shill might have motivated this reaction.
Tho it seems like an unintended consequence.
>>353462 →
>>>/sp/20445 →
>>353746
Yes. Every time this complaint popped up, the post count went to the sewer. What OP is saying is that /pol/ posting is undesirable and hurts pony threads.
So, in my case, I'm stepping aside.
Yes. Every time this complaint popped up, the post count went to the sewer. What OP is saying is that /pol/ posting is undesirable and hurts pony threads.
So, in my case, I'm stepping aside.
Competitions and collaborative projects might help increase the amount of content.
Post count this week seems the same as usual. Maybe slightly higher.
>>353761
>What OP is saying is that /pol/ posting is undesirable and hurts pony threads
Where did he say that? All he said is that there's a notable disparity between /pol/ posts and pony posts, and it's worth everyone's attention to try harder to fix that, because ponies are equally important to what defines is as a board.
>What OP is saying is that /pol/ posting is undesirable and hurts pony threads
Where did he say that? All he said is that there's a notable disparity between /pol/ posts and pony posts, and it's worth everyone's attention to try harder to fix that, because ponies are equally important to what defines is as a board.
This could be useful if you want to make more pony content. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02zg7F6pH30
File (): 0A15C982F4518B43303FE24EE439B8B1-22995.png (22.5 KB, 937x501, Sc350.png)
What a bunch a ziggers.
It was all a lie, isn't?
It was all a lie, isn't?
>>353847
>only two weeks to compare
Thursday just started, and we're only a couple posts behind last week. Post numbers fluctuate.
>only two weeks to compare
Thursday just started, and we're only a couple posts behind last week. Post numbers fluctuate.
Also, that post only shows numbers that began after Monday: once the discussion was basically over.
File (): 987D3EC32A5E40E52F5EEFB33C658FA3-172611.png (168.6 KB, 1103x1024, enyr9efxhoi.png)
>>353847
I'm not sure if OP and frens are low IQ or /leftypol/ faggots larping like horsefuckers. In any case by kicking /polacks/ out this board is on its way to extinction. And this is not their first attempt to run /mlpol/ to the ground, but they might be successful this time.
I'm not sure if OP and frens are low IQ or /leftypol/ faggots larping like horsefuckers. In any case by kicking /polacks/ out this board is on its way to extinction. And this is not their first attempt to run /mlpol/ to the ground, but they might be successful this time.
>>353853
>Where does he ever mention kicking /pol/acks out?
No need, but I saw the trend in the last months about berating polack's threads while they never did anything even close about pone threads. I agree that some threads are not good, but also pony threads.
>You're jumping to conclusions.
You are damn right, if there are almost no /pol/ posting, then this board already lost at least half of its regular traffic.
>Where does he ever mention kicking /pol/acks out?
No need, but I saw the trend in the last months about berating polack's threads while they never did anything even close about pone threads. I agree that some threads are not good, but also pony threads.
>You're jumping to conclusions.
You are damn right, if there are almost no /pol/ posting, then this board already lost at least half of its regular traffic.
>>353855
Well, I can't really speak for OP, because he only made one post, but wanting to increase proportional pony content (or being disappointed by lack of results) doesn't mean reducing /pol/, because it's not zero sum. I think everyone could benefit from more pony content.
Well, I can't really speak for OP, because he only made one post, but wanting to increase proportional pony content (or being disappointed by lack of results) doesn't mean reducing /pol/, because it's not zero sum. I think everyone could benefit from more pony content.
File (): F4BB68AC464D707FC2042451E279BB1F-44104.jpg (43.1 KB, 384x408, 1665328061748184.jpg)
>>353856
I don't especially want to reduce /pol/ content, but I will say that I wish the /pol/ content here was a little better. I complained a while back about how /pol/ content has devolved into low-effort dumping of memes and news articles with little to no actual discussion. The threads OP highlights are examples of that sort of thing. I was mostly blown off, but I still think we could do a little better on the political side than just recycling low-effort Facebook memes. In any event, I think more ponies is something we can all agree on.
I don't especially want to reduce /pol/ content, but I will say that I wish the /pol/ content here was a little better. I complained a while back about how /pol/ content has devolved into low-effort dumping of memes and news articles with little to no actual discussion. The threads OP highlights are examples of that sort of thing. I was mostly blown off, but I still think we could do a little better on the political side than just recycling low-effort Facebook memes. In any event, I think more ponies is something we can all agree on.
>>353860
>I will say that I wish the /pol/ content here was a little better. I complained a while back about how /pol/ content has devolved into low-effort dumping of memes and news articles with little to no actual discussion.
>I still think we could do a little better on the political side than just recycling low-effort Facebook memes.
I think we could do better too, tbh. It wasn't always like this.
/mlpol/ has always been about quality over quantity, but if we keep going down this path we'll have neither.
That's not to discourage anybody from posting or having fun, but think a bit about overall quality. Low-effort meme-dumping in generals doesn't really contribute to a great board.
>I will say that I wish the /pol/ content here was a little better. I complained a while back about how /pol/ content has devolved into low-effort dumping of memes and news articles with little to no actual discussion.
>I still think we could do a little better on the political side than just recycling low-effort Facebook memes.
I think we could do better too, tbh. It wasn't always like this.
/mlpol/ has always been about quality over quantity, but if we keep going down this path we'll have neither.
That's not to discourage anybody from posting or having fun, but think a bit about overall quality. Low-effort meme-dumping in generals doesn't really contribute to a great board.
File (): 0A17715EB1F423CC97D0C3722387C78C-1373401.png (1.3 MB, 3000x1860, cmc30522.png)
having a coup on the board would work the best, more ponies would post if the shit non-pony threads were gone so we would have a more active board without them.
these threads are also ruining /1ntr/
I would derail the the threads here but i dont want them to be bumped and i dont know how to sage here
these threads are also ruining /1ntr/
I would derail the the threads here but i dont want them to be bumped and i dont know how to sage here
KYS.
File (): 96D096D15926EDBEDEDDCDDBA21EE12B-41300.png (40.3 KB, 299x326, 1581809859684-0.png)
File (): FEAABD2154761194886CDD696A81FA33-124340.jpg (121.4 KB, 1024x1024, 8E3753E624C7799E3458DA002E4B911C-124322.jpg)
>>353860
News article aggregation is high effort stuff. Interact with the valuables time and effort dedicated Anons do if you must.
If you think a specific article is important enough make another thread and why.
Why not do what I suggested for pony threads and make them yourself. Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
>>354084
>Anons' useful effort doesn't matter to me
>I know I'll censor by playing on perceived weakness
>I'll tempt with a false equivalence because FUN is a negative sum game.
If posting content and effort means more effort posts and content is made it accumulates. That means it's enriched, more encourages more.
So take your asinine plotting shove it up your ass and go whore yourself to the fishes at the bottom of the ocean.
News article aggregation is high effort stuff. Interact with the valuables time and effort dedicated Anons do if you must.
If you think a specific article is important enough make another thread and why.
Why not do what I suggested for pony threads and make them yourself. Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
>>354084
>Anons' useful effort doesn't matter to me
>I know I'll censor by playing on perceived weakness
>I'll tempt with a false equivalence because FUN is a negative sum game.
If posting content and effort means more effort posts and content is made it accumulates. That means it's enriched, more encourages more.
So take your asinine plotting shove it up your ass and go whore yourself to the fishes at the bottom of the ocean.
>>354091
>So take your asinine plotting shove it up your ass and go whore yourself to the fishes at the bottom of the ocean.
To be fair, those fishes basically are complete sluts.
>So take your asinine plotting shove it up your ass and go whore yourself to the fishes at the bottom of the ocean.
To be fair, those fishes basically are complete sluts.
>>354091
>News article aggregation is high effort stuff.
It is indeed. Imagine to browse hundreds of addresses to cherry pick just a few in order not to bloat the board, then the job of curate the webpage by removing adds, social network links and similar begins.
It really sucks when clueless niggers say that it is low effort stuff.
>News article aggregation is high effort stuff.
It is indeed. Imagine to browse hundreds of addresses to cherry pick just a few in order not to bloat the board, then the job of curate the webpage by removing adds, social network links and similar begins.
It really sucks when clueless niggers say that it is low effort stuff.
>>354100
Bold claims newfag.
To the first as I've said before.
Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
Make the /mlp/ content you like to see.
Make the /mlpol/ content you like to see.
>Only shitty memes
Then you're missing the heart of the actual content.
Bold claims newfag.
To the first as I've said before.
Make the /pol/ content you like to see.
Make the /mlp/ content you like to see.
Make the /mlpol/ content you like to see.
>Only shitty memes
Then you're missing the heart of the actual content.
>>354100
>the threads are only shitty memes
It is no longer your concern, /1ntr/ is other board.
If /overboard/ worries you, then the solution is to shitpost moar so your threads are on top.
>the threads are only shitty memes
It is no longer your concern, /1ntr/ is other board.
If /overboard/ worries you, then the solution is to shitpost moar so your threads are on top.
>>354136
That's a silly argument, tbh. The site is one community. What goes on in the boards is all of our concerns.
That's a silly argument, tbh. The site is one community. What goes on in the boards is all of our concerns.
>>356793
Take a chill pill. Everyone has said this a hundred times before. If you want more posts, make them. Stop blaming everyone else for not feeding you.
Take a chill pill. Everyone has said this a hundred times before. If you want more posts, make them. Stop blaming everyone else for not feeding you.
>>356795
this. I know that I haven't posted anything here in a while and I'm not complaining because I know that it's just the same for other people. Sometimes you just don't have anything to say, and that's alright.
this. I know that I haven't posted anything here in a while and I'm not complaining because I know that it's just the same for other people. Sometimes you just don't have anything to say, and that's alright.
>>356793
Really nigger? You just had to necro-bump this thread again? If you want to stir the pot, at least make a new thread.
Really nigger? You just had to necro-bump this thread again? If you want to stir the pot, at least make a new thread.
>>356793
Also, it's freak Christmas-to-newyears. Some of us have families to spend time with, and can't devote it to shitposting. Give us a fucking break.
Also, it's freak Christmas-to-newyears. Some of us have families to spend time with, and can't devote it to shitposting. Give us a fucking break.
>>356810
We achieved in crippling /mlpol/ from the inside out and we would've gotten away with it undetected if it wasn't for you!
Operation "Disrupt Anon's Obscure Hugbox" has been a raving success and left the greatest enemy of Israel, /mlpol/, in ruins.
Cry about it, goy.
We achieved in crippling /mlpol/ from the inside out and we would've gotten away with it undetected if it wasn't for you!
Operation "Disrupt Anon's Obscure Hugbox" has been a raving success and left the greatest enemy of Israel, /mlpol/, in ruins.
Cry about it, goy.
Ugh.
Please don't give this any attention. The way to create and maintain a comfy community is by just being comfy and being present obviously.
Please don't give this any attention. The way to create and maintain a comfy community is by just being comfy and being present obviously.
>>356812
>We achieved in crippling /mlpol/ from the inside out
Sarcasm aside, facts speak for themselves. OP begun the fiasco and Pupper finished it in an out of touch fashion. Well done, now I wonder if the later did it for money, blackmail, or just because he was high on OP's cum.
>We achieved in crippling /mlpol/ from the inside out
Sarcasm aside, facts speak for themselves. OP begun the fiasco and Pupper finished it in an out of touch fashion. Well done, now I wonder if the later did it for money, blackmail, or just because he was high on OP's cum.
File (): BC38FE38AA8CA3881C755EC4BB2F75D4-1057022.gif (1.0 MB, 400x400, 1625161857565.gif)
>>356815
Maybe our venerated admin would sell the site to you someday and you could be the supreme lord of autistic and racist horsefuckers. Just think of the power.
Maybe our venerated admin would sell the site to you someday and you could be the supreme lord of autistic and racist horsefuckers. Just think of the power.
Please help them. https://mlpol.net/mlpol/355939@50
I wonder if /mlpol/ rarely talks about politics now due to things being so shit in the world.
I don't even see a thread about (((FTX))).
I don't even see a thread about (((FTX))).
File (): A3806E51C42B107AB53A5F505F42707C-62264.png (60.8 KB, 943x912, 131094333135.png)
>>356838
>I wonder if /mlpol/ rarely talks about politics now due to things being so shit in the world.
The admin kicked out the last standing polacks.
>I wonder if /mlpol/ rarely talks about politics now due to things being so shit in the world.
The admin kicked out the last standing polacks.
File (): 09361762DA7E07F269734BEC42C58D5D-23511.png (23.0 KB, 712x217, 2022-12-29.png)
>>356847
>samefagging
btw what are you even still doing here? Didn't you announce that you were leaving for good?
>samefagging
btw what are you even still doing here? Didn't you announce that you were leaving for good?
>>356844
>Source: my ass
Ahem.
No source is needed, all anons saw the harassment boomer anon , the flat earth fag and perhaps other anons endured from the staff and frens.
OP >>353661 made it pretty clear, polacks are not any longer considered part of the "community" and were tossed aside by the staff. Denying that is gaslighting 101.
Sadly no only polacks left, but an important number of ponyfags as it looks like the lack of shitposting is making /mlpol/ boring and irrelevant.
F
>Source: my ass
Ahem.
No source is needed, all anons saw the harassment boomer anon , the flat earth fag and perhaps other anons endured from the staff and frens.
OP >>353661 made it pretty clear, polacks are not any longer considered part of the "community" and were tossed aside by the staff. Denying that is gaslighting 101.
Sadly no only polacks left, but an important number of ponyfags as it looks like the lack of shitposting is making /mlpol/ boring and irrelevant.
F
>>356838
>I wonder if /mlpol/ rarely talks about politics now due to things being so shit in the world.
No, it's because of the generals rule (understandably) being enforced and the fact that the few of us left clearly don't want to put the effort into making a comprehensive thread on whatever happenings are going on.
Why bother with researching and making a decent thread that only two or three anons will reply to, especially when other sites similar enough to /pol/ boards already have them?
/mlpol/ just doesn't have the numbers any more. It's probably not going to change and it's best to just enjoy what's left of the place.
>I wonder if /mlpol/ rarely talks about politics now due to things being so shit in the world.
No, it's because of the generals rule (understandably) being enforced and the fact that the few of us left clearly don't want to put the effort into making a comprehensive thread on whatever happenings are going on.
Why bother with researching and making a decent thread that only two or three anons will reply to, especially when other sites similar enough to /pol/ boards already have them?
/mlpol/ just doesn't have the numbers any more. It's probably not going to change and it's best to just enjoy what's left of the place.
>>356810
Blow it out your ass. I've been here since day one.
And if it's so dead, why are you still here anyway?
Blow it out your ass. I've been here since day one.
And if it's so dead, why are you still here anyway?
>>356852
>No /pol/acks left
I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. I haven't gone anywhere.
>>356853
>Why bother with researching and making a decent thread that only two or three anons will reply to
Tbh, this has been one of the biggest discouraging factors for me. There was a time when I made about 5 new threads every day, but eventually they just stopped getting replies. I could always just make a bunch of new threads, but it feels like a moot point.
>No /pol/acks left
I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. I haven't gone anywhere.
>>356853
>Why bother with researching and making a decent thread that only two or three anons will reply to
Tbh, this has been one of the biggest discouraging factors for me. There was a time when I made about 5 new threads every day, but eventually they just stopped getting replies. I could always just make a bunch of new threads, but it feels like a moot point.
>>356858
>but eventually they just stopped getting replies
WTF, so you are baking breads just for, kinda the Likes.
Go figures, the anons who left, or were banned, were shitposting on their own threads for years without expecting any replies. So, they kept their autism steady and were punished for that. It is fucking surreal.
>but eventually they just stopped getting replies
WTF, so you are baking breads just for, kinda the Likes.
Go figures, the anons who left, or were banned, were shitposting on their own threads for years without expecting any replies. So, they kept their autism steady and were punished for that. It is fucking surreal.
>>356859
>you are baking breads just for, kinda the Likes
No one wants to waste time making a thread for nothing when you'll only get two replies and one of them will be Nigel. It's not about "likes" or (You)s, it's about kick-starting content. You probably already know that, but are just butthurt.
Are you the flat Earth fag or something? Lmao
>the anons who left, or were banned
I seriously doubt many anons have been perma b&t. The staff here are extremely relaxed. As for anons leaving, /mlpol/ is a niche community that spawned from an April Fool's joke - It's not surprising that a lot of oldfags moved on over the years.
>you are baking breads just for, kinda the Likes
No one wants to waste time making a thread for nothing when you'll only get two replies and one of them will be Nigel. It's not about "likes" or (You)s, it's about kick-starting content. You probably already know that, but are just butthurt.
Are you the flat Earth fag or something? Lmao
>the anons who left, or were banned
I seriously doubt many anons have been perma b&t. The staff here are extremely relaxed. As for anons leaving, /mlpol/ is a niche community that spawned from an April Fool's joke - It's not surprising that a lot of oldfags moved on over the years.
>>356861
>but are just butthurt.
Hell I am.
My board has been sabotaged by a bunch of griphons and I don't see any repentance or desire to fix the damage.
>but are just butthurt.
Hell I am.
My board has been sabotaged by a bunch of griphons and I don't see any repentance or desire to fix the damage.
>>356852
>Denying that is gaslighting 101
No, gaslighting is (You) dropping by every couple of months or so to make insinuations that there is some kind of internal conspiracy of staff against users, when in reality the only issue is (You) being pissy because (You) chose to quit staff, which (You) only did because (You) were pissy about things not being run exactly the way (You) wanted.
I have no idea if anyone on this site still pays attention to your schizo nonsense, but fortunately I don't care all that much. If doing this fills the void in your empty life, knock yourself out I guess.
Also, nice job switching proxies. I totally believed you were two different users.
>Denying that is gaslighting 101
No, gaslighting is (You) dropping by every couple of months or so to make insinuations that there is some kind of internal conspiracy of staff against users, when in reality the only issue is (You) being pissy because (You) chose to quit staff, which (You) only did because (You) were pissy about things not being run exactly the way (You) wanted.
I have no idea if anyone on this site still pays attention to your schizo nonsense, but fortunately I don't care all that much. If doing this fills the void in your empty life, knock yourself out I guess.
Also, nice job switching proxies. I totally believed you were two different users.
File (): 61CB30B4BE2E91035A6A20FB86BAC1EF-631668.png (616.9 KB, 2322x2322, 1809491.png)
>>356864
(You)'ve probably been told before, but why not channel your ass pain in a more constructive manner, buddy? I know you can do it and I believe in you. Plus, the site needs quality autism anyway.
If you're worried about your potential thread(s) getting jannied, why not ask the jannies themselves? They'll do it for free, but they might rightfully call you a faggot in the process.
Also,
>My board
lol. lmao, even.
(You)'ve probably been told before, but why not channel your ass pain in a more constructive manner, buddy? I know you can do it and I believe in you. Plus, the site needs quality autism anyway.
If you're worried about your potential thread(s) getting jannied, why not ask the jannies themselves? They'll do it for free, but they might rightfully call you a faggot in the process.
Also,
>My board
lol. lmao, even.
>>356865
>in reality the only issue is (You) being pissy because (You) chose to quit staff
Sorry but nope. I'm not that anon.
That said, I want my site back. Before there was plenty of shit to browse, now there is nothing.
>in reality the only issue is (You) being pissy because (You) chose to quit staff
Sorry but nope. I'm not that anon.
That said, I want my site back. Before there was plenty of shit to browse, now there is nothing.
File (): 0767DA862FE3B2A59B4D79EA57C32A9B-1906031.png (1.8 MB, 3840x2149, 0767DA862FE3B2A59B4D79EA57C32A9B-1906031.png)
I get a shitty ass cold missing the crap.
>Boomer Anon
Having threads without IDs was a downside, having faceberg memes was... trauling through splinters.
The news articles though. I want the articles back damnit.
>FlatEarth Fag
Just stone walls everything, completely frustrating. That fag had nothing to giving besides regurgitation and then went down being a fuckwit not even trying.
>>356852
>>356853
Fuck off. I still have a lit ember over this idiocy by the biggest faggot of all OP and well meaning bubbling sentiment being directed like some fucking river dam simulator.
>>356858
A new thread for every single news article is going to flood /mlpol/ with single threads like that fucking low energy spam.
And yeah the issue is Generals, and originally to keep shit from flowing out everywhere all the time.
The JQ threads had it all, even the wandering shills and that fucking cocksucker being a proxy hopping self aggrandizing bullshit 'debater'.
That 'incident' had all the posts anyone would want, but it burns people out who are trying to have any fun.
Boy did it burn down. The anon posting Yet Another Thing For Reasons and shitposting, I don't know where he's at. He spent a fuck ton of time burning himself at both ends with the gathering stuff and bullshit.
Fuckinf miss Magic Canada anon.
>>353661
This infuriated me to no end. Just remove the literally everything else that'll fix everything!
Then other Anons came it with legitimate concerns, by incident or accident propping up this this trojan horse point.
Boomer Anon beign a bizarre semi-empathetic boomer anon decided to go fix it himself by moving it away to the confusion and concern of many. In a thought pattern only known to boomer anon himself.
>>356853
>Why bother with researching and making adecent thread News happing psyop of the day.
It'll run into the general format given time, because modern politics is just one more shit droplet occurring.
Nearly all of it is shit colored. It blurs into one.
Leaving each individual happening iota just floating. One anon could do all the research all the summarizing all the whatever the fuck, or the slam out a bit of hot shit fast then go about doing that maybe or a volunteering interested anon would look deeper.
<quote by whoever wrote this
>suck up all of the discussion related to their very broad topics,
The thing is those threads had all the supporting underlying information.
An anon could make that singular information post, but then also hunt down all the minutia regurgitate it back have a take on it making research content scrap shit if it's wrong then do it again for another similar one.
But frankly shit's hitting the fan. Day to day is manageable politics is a dumpster fire.
One way or another 2023 is going to be brutal whether or not that includes related threads (the only thing you need in a good thread is waifu, horspussy and whatever the fuck it's about) for minimum effort or time. It'd beat seeing the constant single image single sentence stuff by a mile. Hell if that had a couple different articles or something they wouldn't be tiresome.
But then again I'm a tiresome person.
Enjoy a couple thousand character post with much ado about nothing.
>Boomer Anon
Having threads without IDs was a downside, having faceberg memes was... trauling through splinters.
The news articles though. I want the articles back damnit.
>FlatEarth Fag
Just stone walls everything, completely frustrating. That fag had nothing to giving besides regurgitation and then went down being a fuckwit not even trying.
>>356852
>>356853
Fuck off. I still have a lit ember over this idiocy by the biggest faggot of all OP and well meaning bubbling sentiment being directed like some fucking river dam simulator.
>>356858
A new thread for every single news article is going to flood /mlpol/ with single threads like that fucking low energy spam.
And yeah the issue is Generals, and originally to keep shit from flowing out everywhere all the time.
The JQ threads had it all, even the wandering shills and that fucking cocksucker being a proxy hopping self aggrandizing bullshit 'debater'.
That 'incident' had all the posts anyone would want, but it burns people out who are trying to have any fun.
Boy did it burn down. The anon posting Yet Another Thing For Reasons and shitposting, I don't know where he's at. He spent a fuck ton of time burning himself at both ends with the gathering stuff and bullshit.
Fuckinf miss Magic Canada anon.
>>353661
This infuriated me to no end. Just remove the literally everything else that'll fix everything!
Then other Anons came it with legitimate concerns, by incident or accident propping up this this trojan horse point.
Boomer Anon beign a bizarre semi-empathetic boomer anon decided to go fix it himself by moving it away to the confusion and concern of many. In a thought pattern only known to boomer anon himself.
>>356853
>Why bother with researching and making a
It'll run into the general format given time, because modern politics is just one more shit droplet occurring.
Nearly all of it is shit colored. It blurs into one.
Leaving each individual happening iota just floating. One anon could do all the research all the summarizing all the whatever the fuck, or the slam out a bit of hot shit fast then go about doing that maybe or a volunteering interested anon would look deeper.
<quote by whoever wrote this
>suck up all of the discussion related to their very broad topics,
The thing is those threads had all the supporting underlying information.
An anon could make that singular information post, but then also hunt down all the minutia regurgitate it back have a take on it making research content scrap shit if it's wrong then do it again for another similar one.
But frankly shit's hitting the fan. Day to day is manageable politics is a dumpster fire.
One way or another 2023 is going to be brutal whether or not that includes related threads (the only thing you need in a good thread is waifu, horspussy and whatever the fuck it's about) for minimum effort or time. It'd beat seeing the constant single image single sentence stuff by a mile. Hell if that had a couple different articles or something they wouldn't be tiresome.
But then again I'm a tiresome person.
Enjoy a couple thousand character post with much ado about nothing.
File (): 20C20CACDC9B4337C0A96E14074ED709-206212.png (201.4 KB, 724x719, 1868124.png)
It's kinda funny but I have stopped reading stuff like this completely. I don't even know what's written above me but I have a feeling it won't change anything so I won't bother.
>>356848
Careful, seems an awful lot like you're abusing staff privileges to identify and target posters.
But since you asked, word of this thread reached me so I came to amuse myself.
>>356865
Uhm, wrong poster. All Ive posted to this is to suggest samefagging. The inaccuracy of your other assertions has been thoroughly and exhaustively illustrated previously, and needs no revisiting here.
Careful, seems an awful lot like you're abusing staff privileges to identify and target posters.
But since you asked, word of this thread reached me so I came to amuse myself.
>>356865
Uhm, wrong poster. All Ive posted to this is to suggest samefagging. The inaccuracy of your other assertions has been thoroughly and exhaustively illustrated previously, and needs no revisiting here.
>>356891
>Careful, seems an awful lot like you're abusing staff privileges to identify and target posters.
Not really. You're pretty easy to spot most of the time, staff powers aren't needed and weren't used.
>>356891
>Uhm, wrong poster.
Honest mistake, hence the qualifier "most of the time." Substance of the comment is still accurate, even if it was directed at the wrong anon.
>The inaccuracy of your other assertions has been thoroughly and exhaustively illustrated previously, and needs no revisiting here.
Whatever you say, chief.
>Careful, seems an awful lot like you're abusing staff privileges to identify and target posters.
Not really. You're pretty easy to spot most of the time, staff powers aren't needed and weren't used.
>>356891
>Uhm, wrong poster.
Honest mistake, hence the qualifier "most of the time." Substance of the comment is still accurate, even if it was directed at the wrong anon.
>The inaccuracy of your other assertions has been thoroughly and exhaustively illustrated previously, and needs no revisiting here.
Whatever you say, chief.
>>356859
>were banned
Who was banned?
>kinda the Likes.
I make threads for topics that people want to hear/talk about.
>>356861
>No one wants to waste time making a thread for nothing when you'll only get two replies and one of them will be Nigel. It's not about "likes" or (You)s, it's about kick-starting content. You probably already know that, but are just butthurt.
Basically this.
>>356864
>My board
>Implying
>were banned
Who was banned?
>kinda the Likes.
I make threads for topics that people want to hear/talk about.
>>356861
>No one wants to waste time making a thread for nothing when you'll only get two replies and one of them will be Nigel. It's not about "likes" or (You)s, it's about kick-starting content. You probably already know that, but are just butthurt.
Basically this.
>>356864
>My board
>Implying
>>356891
>word of this thread reached me
Through what? Does anyone talk about the ongoings of this board?
>word of this thread reached me
Through what? Does anyone talk about the ongoings of this board?
>>356852
>>356852
>polacks are not any longer considered part of the "community" and were tossed aside by the staff
This isn't even close to true.
>Denying that is gaslighting 101
I don't believe you even know what that word means.
People can disagree with you without trying to psyop you into thinking you're crazy.
>>356852
>polacks are not any longer considered part of the "community" and were tossed aside by the staff
This isn't even close to true.
>Denying that is gaslighting 101
I don't believe you even know what that word means.
People can disagree with you without trying to psyop you into thinking you're crazy.
File (): DFC8B6AC0BBCA6E33B454466A3189211-6627753.m4a (6.3 MB, , Ram Ranch.m4a)
>>356918
What is NHNB?
I didn't think we were even interesting/disruptive enough for iFunny to still be talking about us either.
What is NHNB?
I didn't think we were even interesting/disruptive enough for iFunny to still be talking about us either.
File (): B7E9FFC91109F44C3A53D947F2C4BC7E-141344.jpg (138.0 KB, 680x680, img_8158.jpg)
>>356914
>This isn't even close to true.
Sure. /s
OP made the repudiation clear and the mod Faces said to boomer anon that it is the will of the community, like the community is about pony supremacy and pol shitposting is not wanted. It gets worst; boomer anon asked the janny if he was allowed to post in /1ntr/ to avoid to upset the ponyfags, and it was granted; but after a few weeks the staff hit him with the book and deleted his threads. In the case of the flatearther is even more gross, the mod tried to bulling him but he didn't bend, so I believe he was banned for it.
The end result is that the post counting went dramatically down, content is almost non-existent and low quality pony posting is widespread. No wonder many ponies pushed the ejection button.
It is also eyecatching the detail that the admin is a fag who writes code but his actions are so illogical and counterproductive, when not destructive; like he is not sane.
>This isn't even close to true.
Sure. /s
OP made the repudiation clear and the mod Faces said to boomer anon that it is the will of the community, like the community is about pony supremacy and pol shitposting is not wanted. It gets worst; boomer anon asked the janny if he was allowed to post in /1ntr/ to avoid to upset the ponyfags, and it was granted; but after a few weeks the staff hit him with the book and deleted his threads. In the case of the flatearther is even more gross, the mod tried to bulling him but he didn't bend, so I believe he was banned for it.
The end result is that the post counting went dramatically down, content is almost non-existent and low quality pony posting is widespread. No wonder many ponies pushed the ejection button.
It is also eyecatching the detail that the admin is a fag who writes code but his actions are so illogical and counterproductive, when not destructive; like he is not sane.
File (): DFE97A6713E500DDF558D81B0B217892-730932.gif (713.8 KB, 1280x720, j8xPJJK.gif)
File (): A99ACE485143187DD34EBAF844252BDF-133453.png (130.3 KB, 706x600, Happy_Appy.png)
Aryanne is lonely? Well in that case, maybe I'll start posting here for a while. Applejack and Aryanne are my favourite ponies, they're both so pure and down to earth and both love dogs as well. Plus I suspect the board's owner may be an actual wolf too, which is nice.
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.
Here's to a productive and just 2023!
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.
Here's to a productive and just 2023!
>>356922
>OP made the repudiation clear
One person saying something does not speak for the entire board.
Also, I don't think OP has even posted to this thread in months. Someone else necrobumped it.
>the mod Faces said to boomer anon that it is the will of the community
Where did he say that?
>pol shitposting is not wanted
Nobody said that.
>boomer anon asked the janny if he was allowed to post in /1ntr/ to avoid to upset the ponyfags, and it was granted; but after a few weeks the staff hit him with the book and deleted his threads.
Those threads didn't belong in /1ntr/ in the first place.
>post counting went dramatically down
It is not dramatically down. It's the holidays, people have been spending time with their families, including me.
>admin is a fag
Yes, lol.
>OP made the repudiation clear
One person saying something does not speak for the entire board.
Also, I don't think OP has even posted to this thread in months. Someone else necrobumped it.
>the mod Faces said to boomer anon that it is the will of the community
Where did he say that?
>pol shitposting is not wanted
Nobody said that.
>boomer anon asked the janny if he was allowed to post in /1ntr/ to avoid to upset the ponyfags, and it was granted; but after a few weeks the staff hit him with the book and deleted his threads.
Those threads didn't belong in /1ntr/ in the first place.
>post counting went dramatically down
It is not dramatically down. It's the holidays, people have been spending time with their families, including me.
>admin is a fag
Yes, lol.
This thread is so full of dickheads on both sides of the aisle who spend more time complaining about their dissatisfaction with the state of the board than actually posting real content.
Wtf is this shitty thread from October still up? Discussion about the site should be on >>>/qa/ anyway.
Wtf is this shitty thread from October still up? Discussion about the site should be on >>>/qa/ anyway.
114 replies | 30 files | 53 UUIDs | Archived