Government is just another tool (((they))) use, and at this point in Ameri-Kwa it's become very difficult to draw a bright line of demarcation to show where the State ends and where Big Business begins. Both work for (((them))).
It's called "anarchotyranny." The enforcement mechanisms of the State are used solely against badthinkers, solely against those evil huh-WITE! men who ask all these inconvenient questions and hold everyone back by not bending the knee and tugging the forelock and obeying their (((betters))).
In the UK you can get arrested for liking a Facebook post with a joke in it about niggers or queers--you don't even have to post it yourself, just not being horrified by it is enough. Imported niggers and sandniggers go on machete rampages and truck-of-peace ram attacks against the locals on nearly a daily basis, throw acid in the faces of women who don't wear burkas, steal everything that isn't bolted down, rob and beat the indigenous British people on the streets, and the coppers shrug and smirk and say they just can't do a thing about it. But express a "bad" thought about a nigger or a pedo and the Thought Police are coming for you. It's official policy in Soviet Canuckistan and the larger cities in Ameri-Kwa. Is it Rastus and his homeboys who are enforcing Schlomo's wishes, or is it the boys in blue with the big shiny badges and the big shiny guns they forced you to buy for them? That's not an "or" question.
In the particular instance of Kiwifarms, it is illustrative to note that under 47 U.S.C. § 230, a provider of Internet services must choose to be one or the other:
a PLATFORM, that acts as a common carrier and takes no responsibility for content posted by its users, and doesn't get to pick and choose or police what can be posted
a PUBLISHER, that is legally 100% held responsible for anything and everything its users put out, including things like unauthorized copies of software, music, or movies, for which they are legally required to exercise any and all controls necessary on what can be said using their services
Cloudflare was a "platform" when it was convenient, until the SJW mob demanded that they start landing some real good body blows on badthinkers who question "the narrative." Then they said "nope! we're a 'publisher' now! PSYCH!" and pulled the plug on Stormfront. Now they switch back and forth as pleases them. They're a "platform" when it's convenient for them and they're a "publisher" when it's convenient for them. They've been doing this for years. Facebook does the same thing. They're a "platform" when BLM terrorists call for violence against Whitey, when Antifa doxes, harasses, and swats "right-wingers" using Facebook resources. When anyone says anything at all that hurts a commies fee-fees, suddenly Facebook becomes a "publisher," and here come the locks, the bans, the censorship. They've been doing it for years, Twitter has been doing it for years, Microsoft has been doing it for years, Tumblr did it for years, Amazon Web Services did it to Gab.
tl;dr "overt State policy" is just one of (((their))) many, many tentacles, don't be deceived into thinking the distinction between state power and "activists" is a significant difference.