>>332546>Last picWhoever she is, she is partially correct. If you don't agree with the direction your respective politicians are steering your territories, your job is to vote them out.
HOWEVER, that's also dependent upon the voting process being developed in such a matter respective towards the country's population and size.
The U.S. and Canada are resptively similar in such a hurdle, however we handle our national elections far differently. From what I have been told, Canada's elections are almost entirely controlled by five cities: Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Ottowa, and Edmonton; with elections decided by popular vote. Meanwhile, in the U.S., that isn't the case. As much as we like to bitch and moan about NYC and LA, they cannot effect the voting process on a national level. Even if California and New York go full one direction, that loss can be made up by winning Texas, Florida, Minnesota, and Kentucky. In fact, when you get down to it, our national elections almost require majority of the state's (In other words,
26 states, excuse me, 25 states, as Maine and Nebrska are proportional) to have vote for our president. Now that's not necassrily always the case, as was with 2020, humouring that it was legit, and JFK back in 1960, but it's a good rule to go by.
Now, I'm not saying that the election process in the U.S. is perfect (*cough*
2020 was a sham*cough*), however it does appear that we are superior when it comes to representation of our nation's populace and size.