A purity spiral trend on the right has been emerging for a while now but it has only gotten worse in recent years. Disbelief in the whackiest conspiracy is taken as a sign of disloyalty and anything other then the most retarded take makes you a shill. Examples include:
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
>you think the pharmaceutical companies are greedy assholes who pray on the despairation of sick people?
>Well I think everything the pharmaceutical companies sell is poison and I'm taking wormwood extract to cure my cancer, you cuck!
>you think mega companies moved jobs overseas because the CEOs are amoral pieces of shit who care more about money than the future of their country?
>Well I think its all part of a plan to weaken the West and install communism, FED!
>you are worried about 5G because you think it will greatly enhance digital surveillance?
>well I think 5G will cause cancer and mass death, fag!
>you think the covid vaccine was bad because lockdowns were used as an excuse to attack political enemies and side effects were ultimately worse than the disease?
>well I think its all a part of the NWO depopulation agenda, pharmakike!
>you are worried about AI because of job loss, propaganda bots, and surveillance concerns?
>well I think AI is actually a demonic force in computer form, fag!
>you hate Hollywood movies because they are controlled by a few studios who push stale liberal trash?
>well I think Hollywood is putting secret symbols and predictive programming in their films to control the population, tranny!
Ect
It isn't enough to distrust the failing institutions, you need to believe they are part of a satanic plot as well. This has only gotten worse over time and I suspect it will only continue get worse over time. Is there any way this can be stopped before it collapses under the weight of its own bullshit into a flat earth singularity?
And I know many of you will claim that some of the crazier claims are pushed by bad actors, and you are probably right to some extent, but silly shit like germ theory denial and flat earth are becoming more common especially on the right. Is there a way to stop this?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
1748184081.jpg (62.5 KB, 612x612, 445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg)
800 replies and 176 files omitted.
1750126086.jpg (365.0 KB, 1080x1001, Screenshot_20250616_200657_Chrome.jpg)
>>392783
Asking me why they would quarantine TB patients is begging the question
Also, pic rel we know you're trolling at this point
Asking me why they would quarantine TB patients is begging the question
Also, pic rel we know you're trolling at this point
>>392785
I can believe a kebab can be trained to be a pilot well enough to fly into a building. That doesn't take a lot of belief. If niggers can fly so can kebabs.
I'm asking you why TB patients are quarantined because you seem to believe hospitals are just doing it for funzies. You can't answer the question because you know that it would mean regular jack offs are in on it or that you are full of crap.
I can believe a kebab can be trained to be a pilot well enough to fly into a building. That doesn't take a lot of belief. If niggers can fly so can kebabs.
I'm asking you why TB patients are quarantined because you seem to believe hospitals are just doing it for funzies. You can't answer the question because you know that it would mean regular jack offs are in on it or that you are full of crap.
>>392786
You believe that a kebab has the audacity to train to become a pilot just so he can suicide himself for his religion. That quite the extraordinary belief
Again, begging the question is begging the question
You believe that a kebab has the audacity to train to become a pilot just so he can suicide himself for his religion. That quite the extraordinary belief
Again, begging the question is begging the question
>>392795
Kebabs blow themselves up and drive cars into people all the time. It really isn't a stretch.
Kebabs blow themselves up and drive cars into people all the time. It really isn't a stretch.
>>392786
>>392807
Ostensibly, the planes were already well in the air and at cruising altitude when the hijacking occurred. It's alot easier to glide a plane toward a target - especially one you don't intend to survive the encounter with - than it is to take off. Yes, actual piloting involves all manner of skills and training, but "aim for the buildings" doesn't have as high of a learning curve
>>392807
Ostensibly, the planes were already well in the air and at cruising altitude when the hijacking occurred. It's alot easier to glide a plane toward a target - especially one you don't intend to survive the encounter with - than it is to take off. Yes, actual piloting involves all manner of skills and training, but "aim for the buildings" doesn't have as high of a learning curve
>>392814
Go check the news in Europe, Africa, or the middle east. There doesn't seem to be a week when a muzzie doesn't massacre others and itself. Muslims are basically just retarded jews that learn self destruct at level 30.
Go check the news in Europe, Africa, or the middle east. There doesn't seem to be a week when a muzzie doesn't massacre others and itself. Muslims are basically just retarded jews that learn self destruct at level 30.
>>392814
You really haven't heard of suicide bombers? I mean come on dude. You are reaching so hard here and you know it.
You really haven't heard of suicide bombers? I mean come on dude. You are reaching so hard here and you know it.
>>392817
>trust the news goy
>>392818
I have, strapping a bomb on your chest and running into a building is much more simple than training as a pilot then killing yourself through an airplane crash. Premeditated homicide doesn't work that way. Usually suicide bombers know their life is already on the line because someone else is after them, thus they end themselves with a final blow while killing their enemy. A Muslims hijacker entering the US via passport isn't that same situation
>trust the news goy
>>392818
I have, strapping a bomb on your chest and running into a building is much more simple than training as a pilot then killing yourself through an airplane crash. Premeditated homicide doesn't work that way. Usually suicide bombers know their life is already on the line because someone else is after them, thus they end themselves with a final blow while killing their enemy. A Muslims hijacker entering the US via passport isn't that same situation
>>392823
The news is lying about suicide bombers now? I'm sure the media just wants me to hate kebabs and end diversity.
No suicide bombers think they will get rewarded with virgins and will deal significant damage to the enemy. If you thought you would get 42 waifus and could cripple zog by giving your life would you not do it? That is the thinking.
The news is lying about suicide bombers now? I'm sure the media just wants me to hate kebabs and end diversity.
No suicide bombers think they will get rewarded with virgins and will deal significant damage to the enemy. If you thought you would get 42 waifus and could cripple zog by giving your life would you not do it? That is the thinking.
>>392825
>the media would never lie about x
You might as well just post on reddit at this point why are you even here
Where exactly did you learn that suicide bombers think this way? And why would any sane person accept that over CGI footage that's been proven to be CGI? Seems pretty braindead
>the media would never lie about x
You might as well just post on reddit at this point why are you even here
Where exactly did you learn that suicide bombers think this way? And why would any sane person accept that over CGI footage that's been proven to be CGI? Seems pretty braindead
>>392914
So 100% of the news is a lie then? All information from authoritative sources is just a big lie then? Sounds like Descartes' demon levels of deception. How would you even know 9/11 happened at all. How do you know the validity of your schizo boomer blogs? For example I know the validity of germ theory because technology I have personally worked with used those principles. So I can assume that the information is at least a useful model of reality that can be used to solve real world problems. How do you know the schizo boomer blogs are valid and not part of this satanic conspiracy you have yet to offer proof for beyond handshakes and boomers worried about over population.
So 100% of the news is a lie then? All information from authoritative sources is just a big lie then? Sounds like Descartes' demon levels of deception. How would you even know 9/11 happened at all. How do you know the validity of your schizo boomer blogs? For example I know the validity of germ theory because technology I have personally worked with used those principles. So I can assume that the information is at least a useful model of reality that can be used to solve real world problems. How do you know the schizo boomer blogs are valid and not part of this satanic conspiracy you have yet to offer proof for beyond handshakes and boomers worried about over population.
>>392915
You are really good at pulling strawmans out of your ass that have zero relation to anything I ever said. No one actually thinks the media lies about 100% of everything, you're just claiming they *would never lie* about a certain thing, they lie about things all the time. Please work on your reading comprehension.
>For example I know the validity of germ theory because technology I have personally worked with used those principles.
Lived experience doesn't equal evidence. Affirming the consequence by saying you worked in a certain field. Germ theory is bullshit because of the methodology that goes into claiming viruses and germs are contagious. No virus or germ has ever been isolated and shown to cause disease.
The proper job in your argument is to demonstrate a methodology that proves germ theory, not go on a rant about "look at me I worked a job". No serious person cares about expertise or credentials
You are really good at pulling strawmans out of your ass that have zero relation to anything I ever said. No one actually thinks the media lies about 100% of everything, you're just claiming they *would never lie* about a certain thing, they lie about things all the time. Please work on your reading comprehension.
>For example I know the validity of germ theory because technology I have personally worked with used those principles.
Lived experience doesn't equal evidence. Affirming the consequence by saying you worked in a certain field. Germ theory is bullshit because of the methodology that goes into claiming viruses and germs are contagious. No virus or germ has ever been isolated and shown to cause disease.
The proper job in your argument is to demonstrate a methodology that proves germ theory, not go on a rant about "look at me I worked a job". No serious person cares about expertise or credentials
>>392916
So 100% of the media isn't lying. Only the media that dispells your narrative. They even lie about random kebabs self destruction just to get the goyim to believe 9/11. All the documented cases of TB and HIV being transmissable and microscope pics are a lie so people will use medicine instead of prayer.
So 100% of the media isn't lying. Only the media that dispells your narrative. They even lie about random kebabs self destruction just to get the goyim to believe 9/11. All the documented cases of TB and HIV being transmissable and microscope pics are a lie so people will use medicine instead of prayer.
>>392917
>I put my trust in the media
We know you're a good goy you don't have to mention it twice
What documented cases? It can't be a case if there isn't a methodology to support those cases being true. Seems like you're evading a methodology
>I put my trust in the media
We know you're a good goy you don't have to mention it twice
What documented cases? It can't be a case if there isn't a methodology to support those cases being true. Seems like you're evading a methodology
>>392919
Can you tell me what you think is wrong with Robert Koch's work or the work of John Snow or John Lister? Or the work of Ernest Goodpasture, Helmet Ruska, and John Enders?
And I don't 100% trust the media, but I certainly trust the media more than dipshits who believe in talking snakes or that boomers with secret handshakes is proof the world is being depopulated.
Can you tell me what you think is wrong with Robert Koch's work or the work of John Snow or John Lister? Or the work of Ernest Goodpasture, Helmet Ruska, and John Enders?
And I don't 100% trust the media, but I certainly trust the media more than dipshits who believe in talking snakes or that boomers with secret handshakes is proof the world is being depopulated.
>>392920
Not sure why you're dropping people's names. What was the methodology they used? That matters more than the person
Usually "talking snakes" is an attack on the bible talking point and a context error, so I would just point and laugh by saying you deny objective morality. No wonder why you have terrible world views, they're built on a shitty foundation.
Also, secret handshakes are learned in secret societies. I'm sure secret societies and their actions are all coincidental?
Not sure why you're dropping people's names. What was the methodology they used? That matters more than the person
Usually "talking snakes" is an attack on the bible talking point and a context error, so I would just point and laugh by saying you deny objective morality. No wonder why you have terrible world views, they're built on a shitty foundation.
Also, secret handshakes are learned in secret societies. I'm sure secret societies and their actions are all coincidental?
>>392921
>people's names
These people were foundational in germ theory and virology. The fact that you don't recognize the names is telling. Robert Koch isolated anthrax and infected mice with anthrax proving it to be a disease causing agent. John Lister was the first to use antiseptics to prevent disease in surgery. John Snow traced cholera outbreaks to dirty water. John Enders isolated polio in human cell cultures. Ruska photographed tobacco mosaic virus. Ernest Goodpasture found how to isolate and cultivate viruses.
Die Ätiologie der Milzbrand-Krankheit, begründet auf die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Bacillus anthracis
https://annas-archive.org/md5/0b8362703b5fe07bfddb4bd18a44ca7e
On the Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2310614/
On the Mode of Communication of Cholera
https://annas-archive.org/md5/196f69733f7d2e90166eb901bd130037
Cultivation of the Lansing Strain of Poliomyelitis Virus in Cultures of Various Human Embryonic Tissues
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17794160/
Die Sichtbarmachung von pflanzlichem Virus im Übermikroskop
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1939NW.....27..292K/abstract
The Susceptibility of the Chorio-Allantoic Membrane of Chick Embryos to Infection with the Fowl-Pox Virus
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2062632/
This is over a century of established work based on this. You not only need to tell why these are wrong, but why all the technologies and protocols based on these principles works.
[Read more] >people's names
These people were foundational in germ theory and virology. The fact that you don't recognize the names is telling. Robert Koch isolated anthrax and infected mice with anthrax proving it to be a disease causing agent. John Lister was the first to use antiseptics to prevent disease in surgery. John Snow traced cholera outbreaks to dirty water. John Enders isolated polio in human cell cultures. Ruska photographed tobacco mosaic virus. Ernest Goodpasture found how to isolate and cultivate viruses.
Die Ätiologie der Milzbrand-Krankheit, begründet auf die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Bacillus anthracis
https://annas-archive.org/md5/0b8362703b5fe07bfddb4bd18a44ca7e
On the Antiseptic Principle in the Practice of Surgery
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2310614/
On the Mode of Communication of Cholera
https://annas-archive.org/md5/196f69733f7d2e90166eb901bd130037
Cultivation of the Lansing Strain of Poliomyelitis Virus in Cultures of Various Human Embryonic Tissues
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17794160/
Die Sichtbarmachung von pflanzlichem Virus im Übermikroskop
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1939NW.....27..292K/abstract
The Susceptibility of the Chorio-Allantoic Membrane of Chick Embryos to Infection with the Fowl-Pox Virus
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2062632/
This is over a century of established work based on this. You not only need to tell why these are wrong, but why all the technologies and protocols based on these principles works.
>>392923
Like I said, bad reading comprehension. You wanted to keep on discussing the people rather than their methodologies
Like I said, bad reading comprehension. You wanted to keep on discussing the people rather than their methodologies
>>392925
There methods are in the papers linked. I know you will jump up my ass if I get so much as make a small mistake so there they are in their entirety. Surely you can tell me what is wrong with these fundamental expirements.
There methods are in the papers linked. I know you will jump up my ass if I get so much as make a small mistake so there they are in their entirety. Surely you can tell me what is wrong with these fundamental expirements.
>>392932
Well I know in Robert Koch's method he used a streak plate and was able to make a slide proving it was anthrax and I'm pretty familiar with the streak plate method. So why don't we start there. Why do you think streak plate is insufficient to isolate a bacteria?
Well I know in Robert Koch's method he used a streak plate and was able to make a slide proving it was anthrax and I'm pretty familiar with the streak plate method. So why don't we start there. Why do you think streak plate is insufficient to isolate a bacteria?
>>392934
Well you start by cultivating a plate full of different bacteria then you take the bacteria from that plate to a new plate the you streak the nrw plate in a zigzag pattern until there is less and less of the original bactria and you can observe colonies with distinct morphology. You take a sample and use a stain then you can view bacteria that under a microscope and observe. If the bacteria is the same shape, arrangement, and all stains the same you have been successful. Surely you have heard of this method, right boomboom? It was taught to me freshmen year.
Well you start by cultivating a plate full of different bacteria then you take the bacteria from that plate to a new plate the you streak the nrw plate in a zigzag pattern until there is less and less of the original bactria and you can observe colonies with distinct morphology. You take a sample and use a stain then you can view bacteria that under a microscope and observe. If the bacteria is the same shape, arrangement, and all stains the same you have been successful. Surely you have heard of this method, right boomboom? It was taught to me freshmen year.
>>392935
Key word "cultivation"
You know what kinds of chemicals are used in cultivation? Disinfectants, alcohols, detergents, oxidizing agents, formaldehyde, Ortho-phthalaldehyde, Dimethyl sulfoxide, acids, bases, dyes, and stains. After using all these chemicals for your cultivation your going to say that it's the virus or germ that caused the disease.
Key word "cultivation"
You know what kinds of chemicals are used in cultivation? Disinfectants, alcohols, detergents, oxidizing agents, formaldehyde, Ortho-phthalaldehyde, Dimethyl sulfoxide, acids, bases, dyes, and stains. After using all these chemicals for your cultivation your going to say that it's the virus or germ that caused the disease.
>>392937
You clearly did not read any of the methods. Nor do you have any experience in a lab, even a highschool biolohy student would know what agar is. The only thing used to grow the bacteria is agar and in the case of koch beaf broth fortified agar. The agar is sterilized with heat and pressure before use. The dye is only used to help confirm the species. It is not put into the organism.
You clearly did not read any of the methods. Nor do you have any experience in a lab, even a highschool biolohy student would know what agar is. The only thing used to grow the bacteria is agar and in the case of koch beaf broth fortified agar. The agar is sterilized with heat and pressure before use. The dye is only used to help confirm the species. It is not put into the organism.
>>392938
Koch also used gelatin, tuberculin, staining dyes, and potentially other chemicals too. You left those out, almost as if you did not read any of the methods
Koch also used gelatin, tuberculin, staining dyes, and potentially other chemicals too. You left those out, almost as if you did not read any of the methods
>>392939
He did not inject the mice with those in the anthrax experiment we are discussing nor did he use any of those in culturing the bacteria. Drop the charade you haven't into any of this. You read some dipshit's blog. You don't even have to take my word for it. You could do this fucking expirement at home with a $200 microscope, immersion oil, agar, polypropylene plates, broth (real broth no salt), a microwave, and a pressure cooker.
He did not inject the mice with those in the anthrax experiment we are discussing nor did he use any of those in culturing the bacteria. Drop the charade you haven't into any of this. You read some dipshit's blog. You don't even have to take my word for it. You could do this fucking expirement at home with a $200 microscope, immersion oil, agar, polypropylene plates, broth (real broth no salt), a microwave, and a pressure cooker.
>>392940
Don't be silly, good boomer goy that puts his faith in the media and science authorities. I didn't even read a blog about koch I actually did AI searches fyi. Besides, a blog is capable of demonstrating a methodology, just like a science paper can, or a YouTube video can. It doesn't matter the source that would be a genetic fallacy, what matters are demonstrating results.
If something that doesnt usually belong into a host is inserted into a host, then it can be a problem for that Host. It doesn't matter if it's oil, agar, or any chemical for that matter
Don't be silly, good boomer goy that puts his faith in the media and science authorities. I didn't even read a blog about koch I actually did AI searches fyi. Besides, a blog is capable of demonstrating a methodology, just like a science paper can, or a YouTube video can. It doesn't matter the source that would be a genetic fallacy, what matters are demonstrating results.
If something that doesnt usually belong into a host is inserted into a host, then it can be a problem for that Host. It doesn't matter if it's oil, agar, or any chemical for that matter
>>392943
The agar is not injected into the host. The bacteria after being purified is then grown in beef culture and the bacteria is further diluted into water and injected into the mice.
The agar is not injected into the host. The bacteria after being purified is then grown in beef culture and the bacteria is further diluted into water and injected into the mice.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-300] [301-400] [401-500] [501-600] [601-700] [701-800] [801-836] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
836 replies | 179 files | 130 UUIDs | Page 4
[Add to Thread Watcher]