/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg
Conspiratard Purity Spiralling
Anonymous
f643d15
?
No.390847
390850 390858 390868 390869 390933 390952 391005 391213 391257 391272 392012 392358
            [Read more]            
736 replies and 147 files omitted.
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391297
62c7a1fb2db04eeece57b1361ce9a087.gif
>>391288
Chillax anon.
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391298
391299 391382
og_og_1500526581294889192.jpg
>>391278
>Yeah I'm sure looking up proof that the world is flat
Do not abuse the subject. My silence is because I'm gagged by the management, not because I lack conviction.
>>391282
>Who is going to believe the random schizo blogs 3 pages into the search over the .gov and .edu sources
Me.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391299
>>391298
>gagged by mgmt
Horseshit, proof or stfu
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391301
>waaaaah, I can't, I'm too scared
Because you have reason. I've probably ate more perma-bans than anyone (except Nigel, when he went on his "McDonald's hotspot" venture).
If you think staff are actual nazis, then it's likely you don't know how to act appropriately on the internet.
Let me give you an example:
Presenting the idea that the world is flat, but then ignoring all proof it isn't, and then calling those proof-presenting anons as "Nasa-Masonic shills"
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391314
391318 391347 391382
This whole shitstorm is proving why anonymous imageboards are not so great as a platform. You never know who you are talking to and the same person can sock puppet and that is to say nothing of the bots that are destroying other imageboards. Maybe going back to forums is the answers. Or a forum with anon section in addition to the rest of the forum.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391318
391320 391347 391382
>>391314
What a bitch-ass take. I hope you aren't "that" Sven.
The solution is to suck it up and take responsibility for what you consume online, and be ready to speak to/for it. Thats it, grow a pair
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391320
391321
>>391318
I mean yeah, but years on these platforms especially with the rise in bots is going to fuck with people's heads.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391321
391329
>>391320
>bots
Oh! You have no idea! Credit where due, it has 'gotten' bad previously, but strap-in your seatbelts.
We don't KNOW where it's gonna go with AI, which is why authenticity is to become prime real estate
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391329
391331 391332 391382
>>391321
It's already getting bad. Not only are the bots learning from the imageboard communities, but the communities are "learning" from the bots too. We are literally being programmed.
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391331
>>391329
Even if we aren't using 4chan directly we all exist in an imageboard ecosystem and we are all being influenced by it. I don't know if there is another way to fight it aside from a forum type website or namefagging.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391332
391335
>>391329
Son, we were being prgrammed long before AI or even the internet.
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391335
391337
>>391332
True, but it has gotten a lot worse with the bots.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391337
391338 391382
>>391335
And individuals will have to rise to the occasion/discernment
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391338
391339
>>391337
Agreed, but what I am saying is that rising above anonymous imageboards as a communication medium might be part of that. A forum could still allow people to use VPNs or have an anonymous section for members to discuss social taboos while providing a layer of trust and defense against shills and bots.
Anonymous
66bf82b
?
No.391339
>>391338
Or hell just requiring a sign in for an imageboard might fix it.
Anonymous
e32c9ac
?
No.391340
391382
The only disinfo they try that they seem to think works now days is flooding with garbage, the content doesn't matter just making sure the flow rate is higher than successful 'searches'.
What they don't get is that they're irritating people who will one day solve the slop to real relationship search pipeline.
They would love to get their grubby hands on it, but they fucked up.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391346
1211247.png
The latter are liberals that need all things to be the result of sin--and be of apocalyptic levels of severity--or they don't care. They ultimately live comfortable, middle class or higher lives and only really give a shit about politics if it's bacon-wrapped in culture war slop. If you even attempt to have a serious conversation about the economics / logistics around the thing they are discontent with--and could very well find valid reasons to--with potential community organization they could engage in to counter that, you just put them in a conversation where they can't navigate through vibes, abrahamic religion and soyjaks. It's much easier to conclude you must be le ebil glowjoo the TV man told them about than to try reactivating the ivermectinated can of spam they call a skull. They will likely die of raw milk diseases before getting a reality check, and there'll be plenty of goons just like them--both human and AI--ready to take their place and keep shouting over the sensible people.
Anonymous
8fc16da
?
No.391347
391349
>>391314
>>391318
Well, I think I'm 'that' Sven you're referring to. I'm the guy who has been the most engaged in writefagging during the years here.
I suppose that we can identify each other through flags means this board isn't as anonymous as one without them, or that I really should post with an American vpn to make it so, if I felt like it. Idk. Just some food for thought.
Anonymous
fbf2171
?
No.391349
391350
>>391347
You're missing the joke. There's no 'that' sven, it was a social-engineering sort of question geared to see what information would furnish it's self, you silly goose. There never was a 'that' Nigel, until one in particular became so.
Recently it became impressed on me the usefulness and versitility of having a hashed tripcode (cross-platform) so one may consider getting one of those, beyond whatever user names one may have incorporated in their social medias.
Having said, it was most effectively impressed upon me many moons ago by 32 million (the guy who killed this board one time because he was strong enough). What was it, endchan/sp/? The gets-ball lads. Anyway, his point was that especially with off-chans (if they prevail) you'll always have a core that maintains/perpetuates/ensures the perpetuity of the thing. In such cases, you can either pick a name, or you'll be given one when you distinguish yourself.
This is actually why anonymity is important, because outside the ability to convey authority, sincerety, honesty, etc. through your words, the words of Anonymous should never be taken seriously.
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391350
391351 391367
79598011cb869c69.jpg
>>391349
>the words of Anonymous should never be taken seriously
Yes, but not.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391351
391352
>>391350
Well yes, one's ability to not die is also relevant
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391352
391353 391382
3edPaf.jpg
>>391351
>one's ability to not die is also relevant
It depends of the personal worldview, then as OP stated, fully redpilled anons are diametrically at odds with the bluepilled ones, and vice-versa; and these differences are irreversible and irreconcilable.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391353
391354
>>391352
Speaking of Hitler, didn't he abscond to Argentina alongside a bunch of the nazis, and die of old age in his 70's, in spite of the official narrative?
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391354
391355 391359
>>391353
There is not proof of it. Just rumors.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391355
391356
>>391354
Ergo, more words of Anonymous not to be taken seriously.
That doesn't mean "unentertaining"
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.391356
391358
>>391355
>Ergo, more words of Anonymous not to be taken seriously.
Interesting. When and where anonymous said that?
Anonymous
66eb383
?
No.391358
>>391356
Hey guys, anonymous here. I confirm
Anonymous
835125a
?
No.391359
391362
>>391354
frequently repeated rumors. Like how Biden was executed and the guy in the movie-set of the oval office was a body double who just happened to have dementia too.

We all have heard that someone earnestly believes. Is the truth actually out there? I retain hope, but not faith for its appearance.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391362
>>391359
He doesn't necessarily have to have dementia, he just has to act convincingly, which he has, whether actually true or not
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391367
391368
>>391350
>frogposter
>asserting what is and isn't a psyop
Thank the Heritage Foundation for bringing about Total FrogPoster Death (TFPD) with the anti-vaxx shit.
Anonymous
505bedd
?
No.391368
391370
15184848.jpg
>>391367
>Total FrogPoster Death (TFPD) with the anti-vaxx shit
The faggot drops his mask.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391370
391371 391372 391382 392595
consoom-ze-sewage.png
>>391368
>Oh nose the goim are seeing through the self-select mass suicide program, call them an antifa so they have to affirm their loyalty to the consensus.
>Meanwhile the pentagon got caught using the same shit as biowarfare against china.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-covid-propaganda/
I watched several of my friends drown to death because they bought the narrative that they should catch it on purpose to build immunity, and several more that caught it anyway. Literally the only people I can recall being friends with that are still alive are vaxxed.
Meanwhile the orange israelite's goons are trying to shill terpintine and raw milk, the latter most recently where they pretended to actually drink some (it's pasturized, obviously) in order to get their followers to die out faster. Honestly, good, the reasonable of the right will remain and overthrow. I'm not going to help make a pipeline to bring kids that could potentially grow up to contribute into the meat grinder, you are already getting paid for that, afterall.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391371
391373
1746343062381762.jpg
>>391370
Pics or they didn't die
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391372
391373
Learn The Types of White Traitors.jpg
>>391370
>call them an antifa so they have to affirm their loyalty to the consensus
They have many names, but they are all harmful.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391373
391374 391400
>>391371
>doxx yourself, goim
lol no
>>391372
>drink the raw milk or you're a white traitor
affirming my point, smith
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391374
391375
572be0.jpg
>>391373
>drink the raw milk
The only thing you can drink is raw cum.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391375
7110111.jpg
>>391374
Can't post horse pussy from your chromebook, can ya?
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391376
391382
784526.jpg
This has been arguably the most successful anti-White psyop of all time. Managed to wipe out entire generations of bloodlines with nothing but words.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391377
391380 391382 392676
7845485.jpg
>mRNA Vaccines Linked to Catastrophic Ovarian Damage
>New study shows this fertility collapse may be permanent.
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-linked-to-catastrophic
The study: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031016/
B-but depopulation is a conspiracy theory.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391380
391381
Screenshot 2025-06-01 at 19-57-22 World Council for Health - Wikipedia.png
Screenshot 2025-06-01 at 20-01-43 Children's Health Defense - Wikipedia.png
>>391377
>[official sounding thing] for [thing]
>thinktank naming convention
>wikipedia's it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Council_for_Health
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children%27s_Health_Defense
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391381
391398
ac4fe7.jpg
>>391380
You are pointing at the messenger (a blog) instead of the damning study bankrolled by the tax payers. If this is not a lame shilling and gaslighting I don't know what it is.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391382
391384 391395 391398
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.391384
391386 391388 391409
>>391382
>If that were true, you wouldn't be here.
This is a very good point. If this OP's subversion is allowed and probably vetted by the management (I don't see any meaningful push back), then this site is a honeypot.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391386
>>391384
>then this site is a honeypot.
Then leave.
Anonymous
bb71f0f
?
No.391388
>>391384
>then this site is a honeypot.
Maybe you should try ourchan. I hear it is a safe space for schizo retards.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391391
391398
2564863__safe_artist-colon-ponerino_applejack_oc_oc-colon-filly+anon_earth+pony_pony_g4_apple_apple+tree_boop_colored_day_dialogue_digital+art_female_filly_foal (2).png
This thread has gone to shit. We were having an interesting conversation about the decline of online forums on the right until it was derailed by:
>If you drink raw milk, you're a lefty/shill/sheeple/glowie/bot!
>If you DON'T drink raw milk, you're a lefty/shill/sheeple/glowie/bot!
This is exactly what OP meant about purity spiralling conspiritards who cannot have a civil conversation about real substantial political issues because they can't stand the idea that others might not indulge their conspiracy theories. Surely, if someone does/doesn't drink raw milk, then that totally proves that they completely buy into the corrupt globohomo corpos controlling their health, amirite my fellow Qpedes?
It's all so tiresome.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391395
391397
>>391382
>That's not a solution at all. That doesn't solve the problem
Because (you) expect others to take responsibility for you, ergo you ARE the problem. And you're right, I don't have a good solution for (you)
>Have you seen /pol/
Why would I? I abdicated years ago. Have you checked the url?
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391397
>>391395
>Because (you) expect others to take responsibility for you, ergo you ARE the problem. And you're right, I don't have a good solution for (you)
It's not a question of personal behavior. Even if I don't engage with bots and retards, that doesn't prevent them from shitting up the board.
>Why would I? I abdicated years ago.
So then you don't know how bad it can be, and how bad this place could be if it were popular enough to draw attention.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391398
391400 391405
7106698.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391400
391407
>>391398
Lots to unpack, and ngl I stopped reading halfway.
If you don't know why raw milk is better by NOW?
Keep drinking pasteurized. It's mostly fine
>>391373
>doxx yourself
Who asked? You said people died, and expected anyone to care, so go on and make them ("us" but you'll get nowhere with me) *ahem* relevant.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391405
391407
>>391398
You don't have to say their names, but next time (cuz NO ONE believes you) you want to parade corpses for good-boi points? Do try, it will work next time, I promise
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391407
391408 391410
>>391400
>If you don't know why sewage is better than water by NOW?
I rarely even drink milk, it's too sweet. It's nice if your throat hurts but there's less expensive sources of calcium like oranges. Orange concentrate keeps better in the freezer, and while you can freeze milk it fucks with the flavor too much.
>>391405
>I didn't tell you to doxx yourself or say anyone's names, just identifiable pictures that could be tied back to you
You could've wormed your way out but instead highlighted the glow of your prior statements.
>parade corpses
When anti-vaxx shit had proven time and time again to be a method of psychological-to-biological warfare to the point where it is a maundane thing to know people that've been killed by it. Saying you don't believe me is like saying you don't believe someone from Alberquerque knows people that have died in drive-bys.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391408
>>391407
and yes I am aware oranges are sweeter than milk, but it's sweet in a plant way, not a meat way. Milk is sweeter than the image of what milk should taste like in my head and it's unpleasant. Milk chocolate is nice tho.
John Elway
## HorseWhisperer
0000000
?
No.391409
391410
>>391384
> If this OP's subversion is allowed and probably vetted by the management (I don't see any meaningful push back), then this site is a honeypot.
Oh, go fuck yourself. You have freer speech here than just about anywhere else online, and if you don’t like it you’re just as free to leave. Nobody is stopping you from spouting whatever kind of schizo retard nonsense you like. If you keep getting btfo because you have no idea what you’re talking about, though, don’t blame the management.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391410
391417
>>391407
Your disingenuity is unmistakable. Raw milk is superior on every front, ask me how I know.
Oh I won't answer, I expect you to do your due diligence (hint, it has to do with soluble proteins, active enzymes, and a whole bunch of other shit facebook didn't tell you)
>>391409
I'm genuinely curious what would happen WERE they to send their best
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391412
391413 391422
>>390859
this is just faggy whining nonsense and a complete non-issue compared to what our enemies (the left) are all STILL currently at each other's throats over (Palestine). Just literally looking for a problem lmao like who the fuck cares
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391413
391416
>>391412
>'our' enemies
>(the left)
If 'your' only enemies are the left, you should lurk moar
Anonymous
3f30f7e
?
No.391414
391422
I remain unconvinced on the topic of OP's rambling mess and the continued derailment of this thread does not help, cuz this sort of thing only happens when either:
>one person is being a nonce on purpose
>everyone else already dismissed OP as a faggot

So, get fucked faggot OP.
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391416
391418
>>391413
don't pull rank on me because there's nothing else going on today, nigger faggot. you know what I mean.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391417
391418
>>391410
>facebook
Oh that explains it. My sole response is to check out the fediverse and it's many superior FOSS alternatives to Zuckerberg's wares.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391418
391423
>>391416
Then don't be using questionable/rhetorical terms like "our" if you're going to say basic-ass shit. It's neither endearing nor appreciable, it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself, while affecting the opposite.
>>391417
For clarity, BoomBoom got his 'name' because all he tends to do is post Boomer-tier facebook memes and deflect from actual discussion.
Anonymous
48edc65
?
No.391421
391429
>>391418>>391418
>Then don't be using questionable/rhetorical terms like "our" if you're going to say basic-ass shit. It's neither endearing nor appreciable, it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself, while affecting the opposite.
and this post makes you sound like a complete cunt faggot, so I guess were even. What the fuck happened to this place.
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391422
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391423
391451
>>391418
>it makes you sound like you're trying to ingratiate yourself
And (You) sound like an egotistical faggot.
Anonymous
fd773c8
?
No.391429
>>391421
Faggots drove people off.
Anonymous
15cb4c2
?
No.391431
391434 391442
1050110__explicit_coloratura_solo_female_pony_mare_clothes_nudity_smiling_solo+female_looking+at+you_vulva_anus_plot_bedroom+eyes_looking+back_vagina.jpeg
1220892__explicit_solo_female_pony_mare_nudity_earth+pony_blushing_solo+female_looking+at+you_nipples_vulva_anus_bedroom+eyes_vagina_ponut_ponified_v.png
1311173__explicit_pony_oc_clothes_oc+only_nudity_male_pegasus_human_straight_sex_tongue+out_anus_cum_commission_socks_penetration_underhoof_vagina_po.jpeg
1335320__explicit_solo_female_oc_clothes_oc+only_nudity_blushing_solo+female_vulva_anus_hat_socks_underhoof_vagina_ass_ponut_bed_bow_clitoris_on+back.jpeg
1354587__explicit_female_pony_oc_mare_clothes_oc+only_simple+background_nudity_earth+pony_transparent+background_blushing_looking+at+you_nipples_vulv.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
3c1f9e9
?
No.391434
>>391431
God forbid people ask for evidence of claims. Special boy is angry.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391442
391451
large.jpg
>>391431
>spoonfeeding
That's for inside jokes and (worse case) board etiquitte, not the substance of a discussion. I have the bad habit of not linking stuff too but it's absurd to assert such malpractice as just.
I'm planning to make an HTML doc to sort links to sources for my opinions as a mindfulness excersize.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391451
391452
>>391423
*curtsies*
>>391442
This IS a spoonfeeding of board etiquette.
Anonymous
5e63312
?
No.391452
391463 391464
>>391451
>if I pretend to be smarter than other people then I shouldn't have to show evidence to back up my positions.
That's you. That's what you sound like.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391463
391474
>>391452
You seem to no appreciate that the lack of compliance has more to do with your demanding attitude than anyone's unwillingness.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391464
391468 391474
>>391452
Here's what I'll do.
Go to search, at the top.
Deselect everything but Mlpol
Enter "Covid" in the search bar
Click "OP text only"
Scroll past the recent shit, and you will find that Archived threads - the ones where all you would like to know - will show up further down the list. Look for Derpy I Am Science, I recall that one being decent. There's plenty of others, leading all the way back to when it first began, depending on when the archive was implemented
Anonymous
128baa2
?
No.391468
391470
>>391464
I can see why you didn't want to link sources. That thread literally links to a blog.
https://mlpol.net/mlpol/archive/364575#364575 if I look further back I can see obvious bullshit like germ theory denial.
Anonymous
c1e47de
?
No.391470
391473
>>391468
So this means you're capable of following instructions! Now if you'll go back to the search results, KEEP SCROLLING and you will find THIS (you'll find #2 before that)
>>256683 →
Anonymous
c1e47de
?
No.391472
391474
>inb4 you could have done that to begin with
No, you had to be dragged through the process of using the search function. This has been a public service
Anonymous
79517c9
?
No.391473
391478
>>391470
You specified the "I am the science" thread as a good one and many of these threads are full of shit like germ theory denial. Why make someone wade through shit when you could make your case and give supporting evidence?
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391474
>>391463
>muh attitude
Then explain yourself to the rest of us reading it
>>391464
We all already know how to use the search function.
>>391472
>you had to be dragged through the process of using the search function
See above.
>This has been a public service
You are a clown.
Anonymous
b58dae5
?
No.391476
I zoned out of the babbling, like, a damn week ago.

But I am enthralled so keep going bro.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391478
rawp.png
>>391473
Yes. I'm Ninjaz. I use subversive tactics. I'm still the asshole, and you're still the idiot
Anonymous
7a9337a
?
No.391479
391481 391487
1695360925088599.gif
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391481
>>391479
Yes, it's very easy to be critical several years in the aftermath, but you're reading it "as it happened" where NO ONE 'knew' what the fuck.
At LEAST learn to TRY to contextualize the information you're consuming.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391482
391483
We never DID get a good explanation for the people keeling over en masse in china, did we?
Anonymous
6099429
?
No.391483
391487
>>391482
More deadly strain in the beginning. Parasites tend towards an optimal virulence to help them spread. Too deadly and they will burn themselves out. Not deadly enough and they can't penetrate the host's defenses.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_virulence
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391484
391486 391487 391518
large (73).png
large (60).png
large (22).jpg
large (21).jpg
>Wikipedia
Anonymous
6099429
?
No.391486
391488
>>391484
Would you prefer the journal evolutionary biology?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01658.x
It's from 2009. This isn't a new hypothesis.
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391487
391489
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391488
2256506__safe_solo_oc_artist+needed_ebola_oc-colon-ebola-dash-chan.png
>>391486
I remember having this discussion on /pol/ about the Ebola outbreak a decade ago. Ebola is not normally threatening enough to cause mass outbreaks, but that particular strain of Ebola has mutated to be less deadly, which meant its hosts survived long enough to spread (also ebola can spread post-mortem, which meant traditional African funerals where all family members touched the bodies became superspreader events).
Anonymous
2d6723e
?
No.391489
391490
>>391487
Nothing that isn't rhetorical and pertaining to your character, no I don't have a counter-argument
Anonymous
0b5a017
?
No.391490
391498
>>391489
Then why even bother speaking up?
Do you disagree with the notion of Optimal Virulence?
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391498
>>391490
Because he is seeking to drive off people who want real discussion... I mean shills.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391518
391557
>>391484
>wikipedia le bad
If you have an issue with the article's contents you can open a discussion there to improve it.
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391557
391559 391571
>>391518
No, Wikipedia is not a credible source
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391559
391560 391569
>>391557
Do you actually have an issue with the contents, or are you just wasting our time?
The other guy posted a 2009 study. Read that.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391560
391561
>>391559
The article didn't tell him he is a special boy.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.391561
391565
>>391560
What a retard, wasting everyone's time. He's almost as bad as the boomer.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391565
391569
>>391561
Pretty sure he has received almost as many permabans too.
Anonymous
a2e0837
?
No.391569
391572
>>391559
The problem is that it's one potential explanation out of dozens, among which this one simply doesn't seem as plausible when taken in conjunction of how events transpired. Remember the 'Summer of Love' riots?
I don't have any authority on which to say that's not a possibility, I'm saying I don't buy it.
>>391565
>almost as many
Please, only Nigel can compete
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.391571
>>391557
Which sources does the wikipedia article use that you have qualms with? Wikipedia is basically a manually indexed and summarised search engine, it isn't the source itself, but it is a credible source of sources.
Anonymous
1a084eb
?
No.391572
391585
>>391569
>Remember the 'Summer of Love' riots?
Why would shitlibs and niggers fucking shit up discredit optimal virulence?
Anonymous
2828f0f
?
No.391585
391588
>>391572
They don't, in fact they kind-of make the idea somewhat ridiculous, in fact. The summer of love is when people just over THERE were dropping dead "from Covid". But apparently, Covid is less virulent when niggers are mad about a stupid nigger dying?

Thread Watcher
TW