/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

445179cb7e0162b822f72d5519a2063f.jpg
Conspiratard Purity Spiralling
Anonymous
f643d15
?
No.390847
390850 390858 390868 390869 390933 390952 391005 391213 391257 391272 392012 392358
            [Read more]            
736 replies and 161 files omitted.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392059
>>392054
You didn't even address his argument.
>character assassination
You called him an anti-white shill first, you absolute hypocrite. That's character assassination.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392060
392061 392064
>>392024
He just listed six different reasons for why he hates Jews. See >>392021 He is clearly not pro-Jew.
This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling. You meet another guy who hates Jews, but you ostracize him for not believing 100% of the conspiracies that you do. The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392061
392062 392065
4772941.png
>>392060
>This is exactly what OP meant by purity spiralling.
OP is beyond salvation and calling him out is a community service.
If You See Something, Say Something.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392062
>>392061
Do you have an actual counter argument?
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392064
>>392060
>The result of that is a number of allies against the Jews
*dwindling number
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392065
392070 392072
>>392061
How is a person who hates Jews for six different reasons a "Jew apologist", just because they're skeptical of one additional reason? Explain that logic.
Anonymous
295ff93
?
No.392070
392074
large.png
>>392065
It shows that they actually need reasons and not just vibes and desire for validation, and that they won't drink koolaid with the rest of the bandwagon when it's time to get raptured by aliens.
Anonymous
f42328b
?
No.392072
392073
>>392065
For the record there are more than only six reasons I hate jews.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392073
>>392072
True, there are dozens, if not hundreds of reasons to hate Jews.
That doesn't mean that an Anon is pro-Jew for not believing one particular reason.
Anonymous
00957eb
?
No.392074
>>392070
This is loss, you cant fool me
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392358
392359
x.jpg
m.jpg
o.jpg
>>390847
>you think jews are nepotistic and spiteful to their hosts?
>well I think jews are actually a cult of satanic baby eaters you deradicalization, shill!
From the kikes' mouth, Israel’s Satanic Elite Revealed.
B-but that's schizo stuff.
https://voxday.net/2025/06/13/israels-satanic-elite-revealed/
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/04/23/bottom-of-darkness-children-raped-in-ritual-ceremonies-expose-the-horrors/
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-856407
Anonymous
81e9d18
?
No.392359
392372 392379
>>392358
These articles do prove that there are some fucked up people in the halls of power, but they don't exactly show that jews are satanic baby eaters. Ritual abuse is horrific, but it isn't a uniquely jewish phenomenon. Christian priests notably catholics and Muslims have been known to do similar shit. These kinds of people use their positions of power to hide what they are doing and network with other fucked up people. In the halls of power intelligence agencies find these sick fucks easy to blackmail and therefore useful so the problem doesn't get fixed. I will acknowledge that fucked up networks of human trafficking exist, but I do not think they control the world or are representative of all of the elites or even kikes for that matter. And think about this, why would jpost even post an article about this if those kinds of people were controlling the world?
Anonymous
153f31a
?
No.392372
392374
>>392359
>argument from incredulity
>#notalljews
Really? No shit, it isn't all jews, just like all muslims aren't involved in rape/grooming gangs.
It's always 'just' the ones who can get away with it
Anonymous
04cae92
?
No.392374
392375
>>392372
Again I'm not saying child abuse doesn't happen, but I don't think a satanic child abuse cult runs the planet. That is what I am getting at here. This thread is about how people not believing the most hyperbolic schizophrenic takes are often viewed as disloyal.
Anonymous
cff9c27
?
No.392375
392377 392378 392487
>>392374
No one has presently suggested disloyalty, what's being alleged is naivete. You haven't even made an argument, all you have done is display disbelief.
Lets try and put this another way.
What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
>are you suggesting that little old jewish ladies will commit satanic child sacrifice
No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
Anonymous
04cae92
?
No.392377
>>392375
>What percentage of pedophiles commit crimes against children? Is it all of them all the time, or do they wait until they think they can get away with it?
Of course they wait until they get away with it.

>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
I agree with this 100% and this is why I don't want these people anywhere near my country.
Anonymous
04cae92
?
No.392378
392487
>>392375
>No, but like muslims and their rape gangs, they WILL support the ones who DO, either openly or tacitly, turning a blind eye.
And this is true of anything with kikes. Especially bad business practices and their nepotism makes the problem orders of magnitude worse than other ethnic groups. Again look at the original post.
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.392379
392384 392394 392487 392499
world.png
>>392359
People that downplay JEWS have 0 grasp on todays politics.
Jews/judaism are not just random people that get in to positions of power.
It is basically oldest running criminal/evil organization in the world.
Anonymous
aae5ab6
?
No.392384
>>392379
This anon knows
Anonymous
8da7036
?
No.392392
>you tricked me
Not for the first time ^_~
Anonymous
2e5e8fe
?
No.392394
392395 392402 392487
>>392379
I do not downplay the jew. I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon, but a biological phenomenon similar to slave making ants. When social structures get large enough there is an incentive for social parasitism and culture of the jew is adapted to social parasitism. The slave making ants do not enslave and destroy host colonies because they do so out of malice or allegiances to dark ant gods they do so because they are social parasites who can only survive by taking the resources of working ants. Similarly the jew is adapted to take the resources of other groups of people who do real work. Their culture and religion bind them together and give them license to behave like shit to their hosts and they do then the host has an "immune response" where they are removed and then they adapt new methods to evade the immune system. If the immune system does clear out an infection the host dies.
Anonymous
2e5e8fe
?
No.392395
392396
>>392394
I know some people here do not like Wikipedia, but these are worth reading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave-making_ant
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host%E2%80%93parasite_coevolution
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitism#Social_parasitism
Anonymous
2e5e8fe
?
No.392396
>>392395
Forgot one. This one is very important.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emery%27s_rule
Anonymous
8b3e7b1
?
No.392402
392403
>>392394
>I believe they are not a "evil spiritual" phenomenon
I do.
Anonymous
2e5e8fe
?
No.392403
392481 392486 392487
>>392402
I am not religious, but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint and still view them as a civilization ending threat? Nothing I said downplays the severity of the enemy.
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392481
>>392403
>but you see how someone could view them from a non-religious standpoint
Given how religious thinking works I'm pretty sure they can't or don't want to. Like their continued ability to remain othered from their ideals and keep them instead on the object of their religion necessarily requires they don't think about how someone not under such bondage might instead think of something. Doing so would risk reclaiming those ideals as their own, being creative with them and destroying that religious understanding.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-art-and-religion
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392486
>>392403
It's quite apt to compare Jews to parasitic insects
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392487
392488
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392488
392489
>>392487
And niggers. Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc., or is this ordinary anon-board faire?
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392489
392490
>>392488
>Do you think that anyone is actually accusing people of being jews, niggers, faggots, etc
Actually, yes. I've been here long enough to know that there are retards here who think that anyone who disagrees with them is a shill.
Whether or not they wholeheartedly believe it is an open question, but the purity spiral persists either way.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392490
392491 392496
>>392489
Then you haven't been here for long enough, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I'll suffice to say
>lol, can't handle the bantz
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392491
>>392490
I've been here since the site was made.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392496
392497 392498
>>392490
It isn't so much "can't handle the bantz" so much as it is there was once a lot more actual political discussion and over time that discussion became shut down when intellectual midgets started shouting "shill shill shill" at any disagreement to avoid having a real discussion or challenging their views.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392497
>>392496
I mean if just wanted to be called heretic all day I could just start posting my spiciest takes on reddit until I get banned and make new accounts.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392498
392501
>>392496
This
It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392499
392502
>>392379
To up-play the problem, that organization includes every abrahamic religion. Go to any christian church and they'll pass around the offering plate and tell you to your face that it's for "defending" Israel and politicians that support israel and various islamic princes with oil rigs and gold mines. Never been to a mosque, but wouldn't be surprised if it's the same deal or similar. And since church attendance is required, you either see the problem and leave the religion entirely, or you stay and that becomes normal to you.

Abrahamism is the organization you're referring to, and limiting it to only jews downplays that. Jews cannot do what they do without christians and islamists, christians can't do what they do without jews, satanists (which is really just a type of christian) and islamists, and islamists can't do what they do without christians and jews. Recognising this is full scope doesn't downplay the role of any trirant composing it, but in fact adds to the list of reasons all three are reprehensible.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392501
392502
>>392498
>It's 2017 /pol/ all over again. Except instead of redditors from /ptg/ (r/The_Donald) it's boomers from Facebook.
Holyshit it is and many of the rtd posters were just as retarded as the facebook boomers so they became facebook boomers.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392502
392504 392505
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392504
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392505
392507
>>392502
In one way I am glad that ethnonationalism has become adopted by normies but it seems to have been adopted by some of the most retarded normies and I suspect that is because low IQ Whites are especially disenfranchised.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392507
392511 392526
>>392505
Oldfag /pol/ users in 2017 described this as the devil's bargain: they won the election in 2016, but the result of that was being flooded with redditors.
Similarly, in 2021 the push to get people to shake off their blind trust in government, media and academic institutions largely succeeded in the aftermath of 2020 lockdowns, but the result was Q-tier boomers inviting themselves into right wing online spaces and shitting up the place.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392511
392512
>>392507
I remember this. I first started using /pol/ back in 2013. It has really gone down hill since then. They fall of 8chan was really devastating for discussion on the far right too. It's crazy to think about but /mlpol/ is probably the longest surviving alt-/pol/. The rest all got taken down due to shooters or drama.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392512
>>392511
And newer ones get shit up by retards.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392526
392528
>>392507
This was among several of the - let's not call them errors, let's call them 'consequences' - that 4/mlpol/ made glaringly obvious, and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Anonymous
2c8a60a
?
No.392528
392536
>>392526
>and is part-and-parcel to why we're here now and why there's a "here" to be 'now'
Exactly we left /pol/ because it had become shit. Let's try to prevent this place sharing the same fate.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392536
392572
>>392528
Haaa, you don't know. This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/, in that you can take heart
Anonymous
6f7a9b1
?
No.392539
392569
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
Some depopulation stuff.
Anonymous
2c8a60a
?
No.392569
392571 392613
>>392539
None of these prove anything. Image one is some random on twitter. The second one is just Pfizer pitching about their product. And even the third one doesn't show that there is some secret plant to depopulate the planet. If you were an elite and the fertility crisis was ongoing and your immigration solution didn't work would you not bring that up at a meeting?
Anonymous
3425e2a
?
No.392571
392572 392573 392595
>>392569
>this doesn't PROVE anything!
This again? Nigger stfu
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392572
392577
>>392536
>This place will have it's own struggles, but it is in no danger of turning out like /pol/
You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems.
/mlpol/ may be too obscure to be completely overrun by bots and redditors, but a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes who are not deterred by the horse porn can shit the place up all the same, drive away contentfags, and generally make the board unpleasant and unproductive to use. It's important to be aware of that and not take site quality for granted.
>>392571
Do you have an actual counterargument?
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392573
392574 392577 392615
>>392571
Post something more convincing then social media screencaps if you want people to believe you.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392574
392577
>>392573
This.
It's not a lot to ask.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392577
392579 392580
>>392572
>You should not assume that /mlpol/ is immune to /pol/'s problems
Who's assuming? Maybe you haven't had the pleasure, but this site is operated and maintained by some of the most stalwart, right, and proper niggers I've ever had the chance to piss off and fuck with. If you think
>a handful of reddit/Facebook phenotypes
have any chance of degrading the site (other than shitting it up occasionally with gay-ass flat earth memes) then you are very silly.
>>392573
>>392574
>convince me
This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392579
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392580
392581 392585
>>392577
>This mentality will avail you nothing. If you need 'convincing' at THIS stage in the game, maybe you're not ready for the 501 class? Maybe you should have studied?

IT'S NOT MY JOB TO EDUCATE YOU, CHUD!
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392581
392582 392585
>>392580
It is in fact not his job, but he shouldn't expect us to all agree with him if he's not willing to support his position.
Idk why he'd even post his position if he's not interested in persuading people.
Anonymous
2c8a60a
?
No.392582
392583 392585
>>392581
Oh was making fun of him. Shitlibs speak like that when they can't defend their positions.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392583
392585
>>392582
Yes, I know. It's a classic midwit deflection. It's not exclusive to liberals though, as we can see here.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392585
392586 392597
>>392581
You think I expect agreement? LOL
>>392580
Yes, petulance has clearly worked, keep at it
>>392582
You presumed to be making fun, but you were actually illustrating how debased your mentality is. Good luck with that.
>>392583
You lot seem to think that throwing a tantrum will get you what you desire. Throwing a tantrum CAN work, but it's a very specific set of circumstances, and should not be considered the 'go-to' method.
Anonymous
2c8a60a
?
No.392586
392587
>>392585
You can't defend your positions. You're a brainlet and you aren't fooling anyone.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392587
392588 392597
>>392586
If you want to be worth the effort, you'll need to do better than posture like a flat-earther
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392588
>>392587
You're the one posturing. You have yet to back up your positions with anything better than social media screencaps. If you want to post twitter screencaps might I suggest 4chan?
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392595
>>392571
>Stop questioning the anti-vaxx doctrine.
see the article >>391370 linked to. You have the uphill battle of people being skeptical of you as you push rhetoric that feds have used as a bioweapon in other counties and likely here. You are in agreement with many neoliberal conservative politicians with Heritage Foundation and Epstein file member ties. You are not the skeptic in this scenario.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392597
392611
>>392585
If you're not trying to have a discussion/argument, why even post at all?
>throwing a tantrum
Nobody is throwing a tantrum. Projecting much?
>>392587
It was you who posted the Facebook memes without backing up your points. Same behavior as the flat earther.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392611
392612 392618
>>392597
You wanna try that again? I'll link which posts ITT are mine, but its none of the ones you're talking about. Hint: Pinkie clown and the boop
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392612
>>392611
Then why were you replying to us when we were talking to the other guy?
You're wasting our time.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392613
392614
d26041.jpg
>>392569
Your below provincial mindset is astonishing. Would you like to post in New York Times' comments section instead?
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392614
392616
>>392613
Do you have an actual counterargument?
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392615
392616 392617 392618
>>392573
>if you want people to believe you
Your entitled to disbelief and it is up to you what to do about it.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392616
>>392614
See >>392615
Also applies to you.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392617
392619
>>392615
Why would you post at all, if not to make arguments?
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392618
392622 392627
>>392611
Yeah I had a feeling this was ninjaz.
>>392615
Notice how one side of the debate provides academic sources and tells the other side "you are wrong" when others disagree and the side of the debate the post social media screencaps and shout "YOU'RE A SHILL!" when others disagree. This is a political discussion forum only one of those sides is trying to have good faith discussion .
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392619
>>392617
It's simple; to try to make the opposing viewpoint stop talking. They don't want to be challenged.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392621
>>392620
Wrong post.

Also, those sources are still more substantial than random social media screencaps, and instead of dismissing the sources outright you should read them and point out their mistakes and flaws.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392622
392623 392624 392632
>>392618
>academic sources
Those have to be taken with a extra grain of salt. Fake science is widespread.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392623
maxresdefault (1).jpg
>>392622
And facebook posts and random blogs don't need to be taken with a grain of salt?
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392624
MV5BYWUyMGQxZjUtMzM3Yy00MDg5LWE2YWEtZWUwNGFlY2I2NzgzXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg
>>392622
And you don't seem to get the point. The point is only one side of the debate is trying to have a discussion the other side is trying to make those having the discussion shut up.
Anonymous
7f4eb90
?
No.392627
392629
>>392618
>I had a feeling it was
Uh huh, that explains why you lied
>It was you who posted the Facebook memes without backing up your points
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392629
392630
>>392627
That's a separate poster, you retard.
Anonymous
7f4eb90
?
No.392630
392631
>>392629
I hope some of you catch my subtlety
Anonymous
d99e60c
?
No.392631
392639
>>392630
Tell us more about your mother.
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392632
392633
>>392622
All sources require "salt," you have to read all things critically, and it's an insult to both yourself and the subject not to. Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them so they can be further refined.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392633
392634 392651
>>392632
>Academic sources *want* you to be critical of them
Not quite. The establishment already refused scrutiny with slogans like "the science is settled" and outright fleeing debate.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392634
392635 392731
>>392633
Only faggots in the media say that. Peer review is essential to the process.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392635
392637 392640
source.jpg
1750039595_2.mp4 (2.3 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:10, pusy.mp4) [play once] [loop]
pusy.mp4
>>392634
>Peer review
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392637
392638
>>392635
It seems you have no arguments.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392638
392641 392646
Scre143.jpg
>>392637
The argument might be you are incredible naive.
Anonymous
b38edc7
?
No.392639
BalthazarBG3-634302586.jpg
>>392631
She's right over there, on the table, but that hardly seems relevant
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392640
392646
>>392635
But it is strange to me how much you seem to hate academic sources, but you have absolutely zero problem with social media screenshots or blogs. It is certainly possible to put your thumb on the scale in academia, but it takes even less effort to make shit up on a blog or social media.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392641
392642
>>392638
You are literally getting upset because people are asking for better sources than social media posts and blogs.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392642
392643 392644 392646
>>392641
>people are asking for better sources
Peer reviewed, settled science, consensus, are all buzzterms meaning TRUST US, we know and are better than you and you should have faith on us. Like a religion.
Anonymous
5fcb5f6
?
No.392643
392645
>>392642
I can trust science if things based off of the science work. You act as if something posted in an academic journal must 100% be a lie. That's just silly. I act as if random blogs and social media are unreliable because they are. At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit even if that process is not perfect. There is no bullshit filter on blogs or social media.
Anonymous
2c8a60a
?
No.392644
392649
>>392642
And on top of that people are right to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet" I have a big family and several coworkers who took it. Most of them are shitlibs so they got several boosters too. No one I know had problems and I still have to deal with traffic every day. I don't see bodies on the streets. So yeah the claim that a shot from years ago is causing the world to end is going to require better evidence then "some dickhead on social media/random blog said so"
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392645
392646 392653
>>392643
>At least the academic sources have some prosses to filter out bullshit
Sure, I don't argue that. However, academics are reliant on funding, that means that any meaningful deviation from mainstream science will be quickly squashed. Blogs are independent, take mainstream science and rip it apart. If that is deconstruction just for the sake of it, the blog will go into oblivion, otherwise, the new thesis will be reblogged and refined to reach the experimental phase.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392646
392648
>>392638
It's incredibly convincing when you screencap your own posts from 5 minutes ago. Quality content.
>>392640
This.
>>392642
Anything is better than a handful of random social media screencaps.
>>392645
Being "independent" does not make them correct. Judge the source by its evidence and substance.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392648
392650
>>392646
>Being "independent" does not make them correct.
Far less when you are "dependent" so.
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392649
392654 392655
>>392644
>to ask for evidence of huge claims like "a shot from almost 5 years ago is depopulating the planet
The fact is the one of the main manufacturers and promoters was Bill Gates, who has generously talked about depopulation together with his billionaires pals.
Anonymous
8f89ef7
?
No.392650
392652
>>392648
Again, judge a source by the evidence they present.
And also, blogs are not necessarily"independent" either. They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant, which means they'll say anything to keep your attention.
You only get to see whatever Zuckerberg and Musk's algorithms permit you to see. Notice how on Facebook you get to talk about 5G nanobots all you want, but if you deny the Holocaust you get banned immediately? It's because they permit you to talk about the former.
Anonymous
916b73c
?
No.392651
392660
1896492.png
            [Read more]            
Anonymous
afca022
?
No.392652
392660
>>392650
>They rely on sensationalism and engagement farming to stay relevant
As well with academics, as they rely on "outcomes" to get funded.

Thread Watcher
TW