[YouTube] The Evil Red God of Winter - History is a Lie![]()
[Embed]Greetings Spoopy Hoersfrens, and a Merry Christmas, a Happy Yule, a most bountiful winter season unto all.
This is a thread Ive contemplated for a couple weeks now, and serendipitously a catalyst has arrived to force my hand.
To start this thread off with holday cheer, I am offering the following video for entertainment and consideration.
And totally not as a precursor for something a bit later. When have I ever done that?This thread is going to focus on a large segment of ideas surrounding the History is a Lie series produced by Armored Skeptic (a youtuber).
This is not an /ourguy/ thread, I'm actually quite intent to take what is useful from his material and apply it pragmatically, while discarding the rest. But I musnt get ahead of myself. All in good time.
[Read more] 350 replies and 112 files omitted.
[YouTube] Does Bart Ehrman want you to leave Christianity?![]()
[Embed]Genetically Modified Skeptic discussing with Dr. Bart Ehrman about how historical analysis and evidence of the time of the gospels is NOT intended to undermine either the church or the accepted story of Jesus, rather to BETTER understand the story and what may have actually happened that developed into the Bible of today.
>>164709>1902: Key to predicting the future>>165119>2040 seems plausible, but 138 years seems... I cant refute itMoar on that and I believe it clarifies the sources (records). Among the incredible and numerous peculiarities is the fact the most today's S&P 500 companies miraculously popped up in 1902. A really interesting chat.
>Max Igan in Conversation with Jason Breshears - Archaix - July 31st 2022>This is a completely unedited, no frills, free flowing conversation.https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/Max-Igan-in-conversation-Jason-Breshears:1Mirror:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IfTXtTD1bOfN/ [Embed] [Read more] Got a request here. I didn't remembered this before, but here it is.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrat_bat_MahlatSince there's substantial talk about
le Kabbalah here; I would like to know if you have something to add or point out as false from that article.
Just a freenly request.
>>165428I still have some cross referencing to do yet but as far as archetypes are concerned, I'm leaning toward the idea that the prescribed interpretation of jews is probably not right in some way and this is no exception. I did find the references and relevance to Lilith quite timely, given recent activity in the Bible study thread.
>>165431Glad to see you've looked into it, thanks Anon.
>I did find the references and relevance to Lilith quite timely, given recent activity in the Bible study thread.Yeah, am the same Anon posting Hu Tao (>picrel) in that bread. Sorry if I came off a bit too defensive btw. Am ill-suited to discuss the subject matter as it is, and just wanted to give my two cents on the meme, borrowing from my personal experience.
So, I'm just a curious Anon here, hoping to learn a thing or two.
>>165432Okay. With regard to Agrat specifically.
She is specifically likened, associated, and attributable to sorcery and the wild woman archetype. To the call her a demon is appropriate, as she is directly asserted to have advanced knowledge of spirit (demon being derived from daemon).
Being that the jews have opted for a right-hand path interpretation of Khaballistic legend, its quite understandable that they would be less appreciative of an infominable spirit, which ironically is the Luciferian spirit.
This coincides with that she is said to be the daughter/granddaughter of Lilith, who is the progenitor of the wild/wise woman archetype.
The early story of Lilith is that when given a proper mate who would challenge man to be greater than he has been, man balked and faltered and failed to meet his potential. This is why Lilith rejected man's primacy, because man had rejected his own primacy, but rather than acknowledge it, opted to try to suppress the female instead (literally, the divine female) and the God of the old testament (Yyaldabaoth/Baldur, NOT a true creator god) who was tasked with trying to perpetuate humanity (think the ship computer from Wall-E) said "Ur right, fuck that bitch, heres a supplicant/subordinate woman.
Because Yyaldabaoth/Baldur wanted HUMANITY to be a supplicant/subordinate, because he COULDNT create he could only try to mold, so if he fucked up what was left of humanity he couldnt fix it.
[Read more] >>165432>>165428It was very interesting to investigate. Ngl, there are observe parallels between Agrat and immediate family and phenomena Ive observed in creative ventures. It will certainly add to.mh repertoire,and I maintain that the jewish conclusion (excuse me, "orthodox" conclusion) is precisely backward for all the reasons one might assess a jewish position to be backward.
>>165446Very interesting Anon, nice. If what you say is correct, I can see it does actually line up with what the femmes believe, at least to a certain point and even if coincidentally.
I kinda wonder what your thoughts are on Tanya the Evil. With your gnosticism and all that.>>165448Am glad you found it interesting, and I greatly appreciate your response. If you don't mind me asking, you aren't a regular Gnostic are you?
>>165472>Tanya the EvilOne of my favorite anime protagonists. Obviously her history is a little contrived and all, but otherwise spectacular; a model for all sociopaths who dont want to be all about themselves.
>>165472>regular gnosticI dont consider myself a gnostic at all, though their material has been quite useful and informative at interval. I consider myself a Luficerian of proprietary pagan tradition centered/focused around (you're surprised?) Ninjas.
Fun fact, the same VA that performs as Tanya ALSO is the VA for Jun Shiomi, from Food Wars; a researcher and insitute head directed at developing knowledge/use of spice. Yes, that was a deliberate reference, with all the applicable subtext one can ascribe to spice as an analog to conflict
I'll take an opportunity to illustrate the great divide in religious/philosphical existence.
There is no such thing as a religion that doesnt involve rules, precepts, directions, etc. Ostensibly, these rules are geared toward creating a stronger person, a stronger family, a stronger community, and a stronger society. Without being specific of a particular religion, the religion is presented as the authority.
When a person submits to that authority, that is what is known as a right-hand path. When a person refuses to submit to the authority and operates in defiance, this is what is known as a left-hand path.
The terms are derived from India iirc, based on the rotation of the sun and which direction one turns when facing north. A person who takes the right hand path will spend their days in the sun and the night in darkness and slumber, constantly facing the rising sun. A person who takes the left hand path will spend half their days and half their nights under the sun and in darkness, as their contrary direction stacks with the sun's rotation, and will constantly be oriented toward the setting sun.
Less figuratively, the right hand path (Abrahamic traditions, not exclusovely) impress the idea of the infallibility and absolute authority of God, and the absolute necessity of submission to God. Left hand path traditions (Norse, being a particularly good example) are all about defying the dictates of God or Gods, insisting that the individual find their own satisfaction and purpose in life, refusing any imposition or control on their free will.
Lets take a look at Genesis. The right hand path sees that God was right to forbid eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and that God was just for expelling Adam and Eve for their disobedience.
The left hand path feels that God was attempting to imprison humanity in the garden of Eden, offering perpetual life (the fruit of life) in exchange for never achieving the knowledge and understanding that humanity was intended to have from ther creation. As such, the first act of defiance against this God was the first step toward humanity's emergence and sovereignty. The idea here being, humanity was intended for more than the 'protector' God would allow, and THEY were just in their defiance.
The difference in the two schools of thought - beyond having vastly different interpretations of who is who and what is what - is one of individual agency. Lhp feels the individual is right and entitled to determine their own pursuits, devotions, etc. by their own agency, in order to get closer to what is viewed as the true God. Rhp feels that unchecked human agency causes increased separation from God, leading to the ruination of man.
Rhp further asserts that morality COMES from God, and that to defy is immoral, whereas Lhp tends to assert Natural Law as a moral framework, and that the pursuit of God in defiance of dictates is how one correctly approaches God.
[Read more] >>165474>>165473>you're surprised?Certainly not.
Sociopath & Proud>>165476>RHP n' LHPI don't feel like using your bread for something that's basically just concerning myself. But I would appreciate if you were to follow me.
>>>/ub/5854 → Bumping with some very good questions about Tartaria.
>>167448Here's the document referenced.
However, I must say this zoomie gets on my nerves. Of course they could build such buildings. Not long ago European nations were building fucking cathedrals. My grandpa built the family home with his own hands, and helped build a nearby church. We had huge walls around our cities, and that was no "Tartarian" empire, but Catholic. All the while the plebs (like my grandpa and by grandpa's grandpa) slept wall to wall with their pigs. The fact that these people rode in carts has nothing to do with the nation's might.
I'm sorry, but this is something that exasperates me about zoomers. They think the iPhone in their hands is somehow indicative of the level of progress of the society they live in, while that society is actually crumbling under the weight of its own degeneracy.
To end my rant, here's an automatic summary of the document, and "Tartaria" refers to Turks from Crimea.
>Page 1:>Proclamation from December 7, 1917, by Lenin and Stalin promising freedom for Muslim beliefs and customs.>Criticism that these promises were not kept; instead, repression of Islam began.>Specifics: closure of mosques, outlawing of religious brotherhoods, and campaigns to ridicule Islam.>Page 2:>Decrease in the number of mosques from 7,000 in 1917 to 1,312 in 1942.>Many mosques repurposed or allowed to fall into disrepair.>Closure of madrasahs and suppression of Islamic literature.>Abolition of Shariah and replacement with Soviet laws.>Page 3:>Difficulties in practicing the five pillars of Islam.>Compulsory teaching of Russian in minority schools since 1938.>Russian becoming the language of business and social life.>Russianization of minority languages and cultures.>Page 4:>Changing of scripts from Arabic to Latin to Cyrillic, disconnecting younger generations from their literary heritage.>Suppression and denigration of traditional epic poems and historical figures.>Deportation of entire Muslim peoples during World War II.>Page 5:>Acknowledgment by Krushchev of these actions as violations of national rights.>Contrasting the promises with actual actions, arguing that cultural autonomy was not respected.>Pages 6-13:>Citations from historical documents and publications to support the claims made in the document. [Read more] Oh wow, its a rare experience to be this back-handedly gnomed. No, this is a a rare treat. This is like Inception-level gnoming
