/qa/ - Questions and Answers

>>7529
Happy to oblige.

>>7528
>/1ntr/ is its own thing
How so?
It was a dead board for years and was popping up mostly because I posted in the Caturday thread.

>>7527
Kek
Another ram ranch serf has slipped out.
We'll see if the hidden flag doesn't trip you off like it has since 2019.

>>7532
Only homosexuals have cats.
>>7533
Bro, I photoshopped your daddy into gay porn so hard that he allegedly left the site.

>>7532
The users can post to it at their own speed. It is not for dumping /pol/ generals.
Heck, generals aren't even supposed to be anywhere on this site. If the management were as draconian as you imply they'd be removed entirely, but they haven't been, so quit seething.

>>7534
Hey, I was the one who trashed his NORDcisim thread. You were just slightly more autistic.

>>7534
>Only homosexuals have cats.
It is the Caturday thread, not my home faggot.

>>7536
>Hey, I was the one who trashed his NORDcisim thread.
Why do you hate your dad so much?
>>7537
Okay, but I think you should get checked for toxoplasmosis.

>>7535
>so quit seething.
Okay.

>>7538
Eww
Atleast you don't have a pic to work with

>>7540
At least no one else posted pics of themselves on a chan site while being a fag.
I'm proud of you guys.

>>7534
>Ban me nigga!
That was pretty dumb ngl

I just complained about some low quality boomer threads, but idk wtf some of this obscure interpersonal drama is. I've been here since April 2017, but idk who these people even are.

>>7543
>I just complained about some low quality boomer threads
You just might ignore them faggot.

>>7543
>I just complained about some low quality boomer threads,
Take in count that threads are not meant to please you or meet your personal standards, and might be wise if you predicate with the example and pad those "low quality threads with the content you consider adequate, otherwise you are full of shit.

>>7542
Dude, this site let's people keep foalcon/Loli up and my shit was deleted for posting an edited image he uploaded of himself. Didn't get banned, so whatever. Was still the hardest I've laughed in years.
>>7543
Go back to twitter or wherever, faggot. You also had the option just ignore them. The site is so slow anyway that you could readily visit a specific board to find whatever you want.
I made fun of the boomer memes, but I never wanted them banned altogether.

>>7546
>>7547
>>7548
I haven't been complaining all the time, mostly just in threads where it's brought up, like this one. I usually just ignore the shitty threads; they've been here for a while now.

>>7548
It was pretty funny. But I mean, it gets a bit depressing after a while.

Has anyone here ever visited a bullshit church full of unchristian nonsense like tarot cards and phony psychics?

I entered one once and it made me think "All of these motherfuckers need Jesus".
The old hag on stage pretending to be psychic pointed to me and said "Your mom loves you!"
"No," I told her.
"Your mom loves you and is bad at showing it!"
"My mom abandoned us when I was two," I lied just to see what this psychic would say. "Dad died when I was six and my grandfather raised me alone."
I'm terrible at lying. The nervous laughter kicked in and I said I'm not used to crowds looking at me.
The fucking "psychic" starts making up vague stories that probably happened to anyone raised by a granddad, but my grandfather died a long time ago and we didn't live together and none of the stories she made up are true.
I roll with it until she decides to move on and continue emotionally manipulating other fifty-something boomers who COULD have made themselves a godless support group for people still not over their dead grandmas but no, they'd rather gather in this fake church so an old hag can fuck their psychological wounds back open.

What is this a role call?
Anyway, when's the estimated time for the Equestria portal?

>>7549
If so, then why is there this pushback against boomer anon from what appears to be the community? Again, it's easy enough to ignore or ridicule, yet policy seems to have been hastily influenced. There are way worse things than boomer memes and gay porn edits of images users upload of themselves, if you want to go down that road. The double standard doesn't make much sense.
>>7550
Thanks, but I think you'd be depressed regardless. Still, I'll see about getting you access to water bottles in exchange for more pone and less eqg.
>>7552
Yes, it's a role call. No, you will never be a fully.

>>7553
>boomer anon
Fuck.

>>7553
>If so, then why is there this pushback against boomer anon from what appears to be the community?
It is not the community, but a couple of vocal anons. Take in count that boomer anon is also the community.

See the reason:
>>7506
>The root of the issue is so silly as pure jealousy because of their threads not getting the traction they think they deserve.

>>7553
U were still off-topic tho

>>7553
>ywnbaf
Good.

>>7554
>>7555
It's okay, Anon. I still appreciate your efforts and I was never opposed to them aside from making fun your boomer memes. I'm sure you're a cool guy. It would be nice if you put more effort into it, though.
>>7556
Not as off-topic as the lost and drunk Spaniards that made you by fucking monkeys.
My bullying of Niggas resulted in joy for you all and a better site overall. I stand by it, especially before him persistently namefagging and shitting up every other thread. Sorry, he's probably not your biological father. Keep looking.

There was definitely a double standard when it came to rules being applied. I'm not particularly bothered by it, but it is relevant to this discussion.
Boomer anon has been abused and I will simp for him.

>>7558
>I still appreciate your efforts and I was never opposed to them aside from making fun your boomer memes.
Thanks poner.

>>7558
Niggas was going nuts. But I don't think there was any double standard. They definately jumped in out of pity tho.
Still, boomer anon deserved the rope long ago. And no simping will save him.

>>7560
>I don't think there was any double standard. They definately jumped in out of pity tho.
You realize the irony in that statement, right? Niggas gets ridiculed and mods step in, but everything else is a free for all. I'm not trying to shit on staff and I'm not particularly bothered by it from a personal standpoint, but it's definitely relevant.
Why does boomer anon get treated differently? I understand that the constant barrage of boomer memes can be a bit much, but has he violated any rules?
In a way, it's like comparing apples to oranges: Niggas starts shit and had shit thrown back at him - mods intervene. Boomer anon posts threads and gets shit on by the site after a few fags whine about it. Definitely not the same in the minor details, but some consistency would be nice.
Honestly, I'd get it if Pupper and the staff just outright said "lol fuck you" since it's his site. Otherwise, I don't get it.

>>7558
>Joy
What brings me joy is not having him around, and you posting his face along with engaging him kind of put me in the worst spot possible of having to side with him and the consequences of keep him around longer. You just had to push it and have him encouraged to stay. Please stick to the tried and true method of ignoring and sometimes rule 10 to get an annoying poster to stop.

If anyone was to post your face, it would be met with the same actions. You are otherwise free to make whatever comments about him because heaven knows he will do the same to you. Retard thought it was great to abuse the report function to let off steam all the time.
>>7562
The staff has tried to be completely neutral on this issue. I have been the only one to directly act on it because of the users that asked for action. I simply asked boomer poster to please argue for what he was doing so I could better assess the situation. I don’t really understand the train of logic that led to the move to /1ntr/, but I didn’t do anything about it until there was significant complaints against it. The oddity of the whole situation is another reason we didn’t want to act much on it because taking the wrong stance, as you can see, will end in much controversy. Sometimes you have to sit back and see how things unfold a bit because smacking down everyone’s ideas is not fun.

If you ever have a problem with the direction staff takes things in, all it takes is some dialogue because I was looking for any reason to hear him out and I was given nothing. So to best handle the situation, I left the posts up but locked the thread so if anyone wanted to save anything or demand it be migrated, it could be done. Anon seemed to not take that well and up and left for a time. I then deleted the threads because they don’t really belong there and we’re always allowed on /mlpol/.

The only indication they weren’t welcome there was from the users that wanted more mlp. I won’t lie and say I am a fan of low effort posting Facebook memes, but it is allowed. Hence my comments about putting more effort so we don’t have a general people bitch about. You can post Facebook memes in brand new threads by simply adding your thoughts to the thread instead of someone else’s you copy/pasted. It just takes a couple minutes of thought and people will not have a problem with it anymore, providing actual opportunities to engage users. Bonus points for bot posting fucking Facebook shit too.

I hope this answers some questions. Let me know if I need to clarify anything else.

>>7553
>why is there this pushback against boomer anon from what appears to be the community?
Because other Anons don't like it either. Even you call those posts boomer tier.
If Anons didn't value quality over quantity, there would be no reason to use this site over 4chan.

>>7564
Idk though. I mostly stopped complaining about that stuff months ago. I really don't give a fuck anymore.
I'll still gladly chime in if he's gonna whine about "management intervention" though.

>>7563
>>7564
I understand. I was mostly just playing devil's advocate and having fun shitposting. I am now bored and tired. Will cease my faggotry.

>>7558
>My bullying of Niggas resulted in joy for you all and a better site overall.
I disagree. That drama was unsightly and quite frankly annoying. Just because someone is an annoying shitposter doesn't mean it needs to be reciprocated or antagonized. Countershitposting is still shitposting.
This is supposed to be an anonymous board, but die to our small user pool it's all too easy for retards to stir up drama with one another behind the veil.
>persistently namefagging and shitting up every other thread
On that, at least, we agree. He was shitting up a lot of my own threads too, especially the ones on /qa/ when I wanted to open a casual conversation about some site issues worth talking about and he derailed it with drama that put everyone on edge.

>>7562
>but everything else is a free for all.
They did the same with Nigel tho. Which was also justified, given niggas was following him around the entire site.
>I'm not particularly bothered by it from a personal standpoint
Kek
You were compelled to stay past 2 a.m. tho
>>7566
At least you've learn to pull the brakes now. Wish I could say the same about the sociopathic carpenter and his british femboy.

Question.
I have a big fresh cache of memes (around 50). Given that there has been some difficulties with meme posters, how many I would be allowed to post without to trigger a retaliatory ban?

>>7571
There is no such thing as a retaliatory ban for posting. If you expect to post that many images, you should post them on topic and with content to back up the images. For example, look at all the images in this thread.
https://mlpol.net/mlpol/357025
Or this thread.
https://mlpol.net/mlpol/348497
You see no complaints about this posting style. You can also make threads dedicated to encouraging others to post alongside yourself with all of your collected images.

This is self-explanatory. If you do go around dumping files haphazardly, you will not be banned for this action alone. What will likely happen is us asking you to stop autistically grabbing everything you possess and slapping it wherever you feel like. Thus, it is in all of our best interests that you use common sense and restraint when posting large quantities of images.

>>7572
>For example, look at all the images in this thread.
> ...........
Those threads are made by writefags for writefags. A deluge of typing only suitable for autistic literacy. Sorry but that is beyond my abilities. Collecting material and post, dump, spam, fill, pad, the related threads is my autistic ability.

>>7572
>What will likely happen is us asking you to stop autistically grabbing everything you possess and slapping it wherever you feel like.
In all fairness, there was times when I made 25/30 posts a day and posted only ~20% of everything I have that day. So, I had some restrain indeed to not overwhelm writefags.

>>7573
I'm going to explain it in a way retards can understand, and hopefully then you'll understand as well.
>Appulhors greentextc
>Applehoers.gif
Okay so far so good.
>Corona newses
>PoneSickSippingSoup.wav
Let's keep going.
>Writefag thread
>T O P I C A L P I C T U R E.png
Last one.
>PushUp Thread
>WorkingoutPone.mp4
You post STUFFS that fit into the category. It's puting the square peg into the square hole.
If you have a star shapped peg but you can't find somewhere where it fits, you make a thread that has a star shapped hole.
Then you put it in Twilight Sparkle's Star Hole.
It's storting but more fun.
This also applies for news articles, pictures and other media.
I'm just an asshole, but whole dumps irregardless of anything else may be insensitive and the stuff has less positive impact.
You could go more esoteric and have it be one level of abstraction away from on topic, or more, but then it may seem less on topic.
This is advice from an anon who shitposts.
Faceberg Boomer memes are tactically speaking less on topic because they are less enjoyable. Some may even say anti-enjoyable.
Let's put it another way.
If it enhances the area around it like for example white people then post it.
If it degrades the surroundings to a ghetto of crime and niggery reconsider.

>>7575
>and hopefully then you'll understand as well
If I understand it well, you want some context added to the pic, not to mention to make fit in the right proper bread.
I'm working on it. If I fail let me know.

>>7571
>some difficulties with meme posters
What are you talking about?

>>7573
>by writefags for writefags
They were made by writefags for everyone

>>7571
Post it as a zip file

I would like to post a thread about the Crowder/Shapiro shitshow.
There are a few doubts about where to do it.
The fags are e-celebs but the theme is Conservative Inc. and the jews.
So, where it should be posted? In /sp/ or /mlpol/?

>>7585
Should be fine on either board. There are political topics brought up to allow for discussion. The point of rule 8 is to not glorify a celebrity as the rule clarifies that the topics covered are fine. A pure feud between the two that is not over political differences might be better suited for /sp/. If there is a political point that has caused a fallout or controversy, then /mlpol/ will work. I haven't followed this story to know the context of what you are referring to as a shitshow.

>>7585
The Shapiro Shitshow is inherently political because the Jew offered Crowder a deal with the jewish devil and Crowder said no.
They're not butthurt at each other over sports opinions or any petty youtube drama.
Crowder said no to handing over everything he's built for cash and giving the jew control over how conservative he and his audience can be. Everyone's got opinions on this but nobody can deny what a blatant fraud Jewden Peterstein became after he signed up to suck israel's cock while bashing Mudbombs and Christians in equal measure.

>>7589
I'm gathering material to post it. It will take a while.

>>7590
Good luck with the thread.

how get rancid cum stink out fleshlite?

>>7593
Boil water. Let it cool until it is somewhat hot. Use it and a rag to clean it well. If it smells vile, you're eating something wrong or you're taking too long to clean it.

It looks like the spammer took the weekend off.

More pone is needed.
Post hoers faggots.

/mlpol/ pass when?

>>7637
What?

>>7644 → Why is this thread locked? I have stuff to say about it.

>Tbh, if the guy wants his posts removed for the sake of privacy, it's not a completely unfair request.
>Can't mods view posts that came from the same hashed IP? Doing that a couple times shouldn't be that difficult.

>>7708
I might make a separate thread to reply to these posts in a usable format.

>>7708
>>7708
Your questions have been answered in our previous answers to the deletion request >>7695 → >>7696 →. We’re willing to delete personally identifiable information. We’re not willing to delete multiple entire threads containing hundreds and even thousands of posts by many people on the pure allegation that there’s totally some identifiable information in there somewhere trust-me-bro-but-I-don’t-trust-you-enough-to-tell-you where-it-is. The request for deletion has to be more specific, and narrowly tailored.

We’re not deleting a minor book’s worth of posts and we are not going to read a minor book’s worth of posts to find deletion worthy material.

>>7711
>not willing to delete multiple entire threads
Why though? The threads themselves are already in the archive, and most of them were nothing special, except maybe just some cringey shitflinging; I was there for a most of them. I doubt that anyone would miss them. Nobody is going to read them unless it's to make a kiwi farms article or something. Overall, an OP should have some degree agency in deleting their own threads, but he's just unable to do so because his password has since changed.
>delete personally identifiable information
>request for deletion has to be more specific, and narrowly tailored
Wouldn't that just make it more tedious? It should be easier to just Control+F the threads that came from the same IP in a certain time periods. It could be over in a few minutes.

>>7709
Thread made: >>7710 →

>>7711
>We’re not deleting a minor book’s worth of posts
That would be a minor book that nobody would ever read in the first place. I can't imagine anybody ever digging any of Nigel's shitty threads out of the archives with good intentions for him.
>not going to read a minor book’s worth of posts to find deletion worthy material.
So just search the threads made by him (idk if this is done by IP hash or by post password) and then delete them all at once without reading them. Hardly any of the threads were /go/ material. It's a thing he would do himself if he still had the passwords. You could just think of it as assisting a site user to recover their password, in a way.
I just don't get what the point is for keeping the old threads. If the process of removing them is too difficult, then that's a fair point, but I don't see this logic of needing to keeping the threads on principle or whatever: it's basically just old garbage.

>>7713
Why not delete entire threads? First of all, these are not in the archive. They are active on the boards and have been posted in as recently as a week or so ago.

But let me answer your question directly: when you post in a public forum for all of the public to see, and then people respond to that, and then you reply, others reply, and find goes on - what you’ve said is no longer yours alone. You have forfeited, by the act of knowingly posting publicly, by the act of others replying, by the act of continuing to post public ally over a period of, in this case, three years… any kind of right to privacy. It’s no longer yours. It doesn’t belong to you any more. It belongs to the great mass of human discourse and culture now. It’s a part of that collective mass now - not yours. I could imagine exceptions like if you just posted it less than 24 hours ago, or if it’s been more than 10 years since you last posted, or if no one replied. But this isn’t that.

Chans do have passwords to delete posts. But those passwords change pretty quickly. Because you’re not meant to be able to delete your posts forever.

And let me ask you this: if I post something, then you reply to me… and this goes on for a while with both of us speaking, do I then have a right to remove your replies to me without your consent or even consultation, just because I regret my earlier posts? Because that’s what’s being asked here.

>editing posts versus deleting them
I think this would be a worthy discussion to have… if any posts containing such information had ever been reported. Instead, we only have the OP of a thread.

Again, Elway has already answered these questions in detail in >>7696 →

>>7717
>They are active on the boards and have been posted in as recently as a week or so ago.
Ah, I was mistaken then. That puts things in perspective. That actually changes my opinion a bit here.
>It doesn’t belong to you any more.
It's a fair point, although we wouldn't even be having this discussion if he hadn't lost the passwords to delete said threads: an ability that OPs have by default, and I don't think there's any real statute of limitations on that except for how long one keeps the password (which he has of course lost, and thus lost the ability). Someone else deleting a thread isn't that different from him deleting them himself.
I guess he shouldn't have lost the passwords, but threads on this board then to stay up for weeks and it's very easy to close a tab or change IPs to lose that password.
>But those passwords change pretty quickly. Because you’re not meant to be able to delete your posts forever.
I really don't think this is by-design, but you could consider it a consequence that posters have to deal with. He should have thought before he posted.
>if I post something, then you reply to me… and this goes on for a while with both of us speaking, do I then have a right to remove your replies to me without your consent or even consultation, just because I regret my earlier posts?
Lotus... I'm not sure how you want me to reply to this, but I know you've done exactly that several times before in the past. It wasn't cool at the time, but maybe it shows that sometimes things are nuanced. It's not really relevant to the principle of it, but I hope you can understand Nigel's perspective here.

Maybe I'm being overly sympathetic to Nigel here, but I can sympathize with a person having posted cringe to a site for years and simply wanting to be forgotten when he left it. I had my own problems with DeviantArt and boorus and other stuff in the past, so I can see where he's coming from.

However, now that it comes to my attention that all of the threads are still active, and not in the archives, I can't confidently say there's no harm in removing them because posters might still want to reply to them. I, for one, wouldn't miss those threads, but I cannot speak for the board, so idk.

That's just my two cents on the matter. Do as you will.

>>7708
>>7709
I've posted an answer to your question in the thread you made. >>7719 →

>>7713
>The threads themselves are already in the archive
This is actually not accurate. All four threads were in the catalog. One of them had hit bump limit, but since /ub/ is a relatively slow board it hadn't fallen out of the catalog. Despite the thread being several hundred posts past bump limit, the user in question was still replying to it as recently as last week. We're not talking about archived threads, we're talking about basically active threads that have hundreds of posts in them. I know this misunderstanding has already been cleared up, but I just want to clarify it again for emphasis.

>I doubt that anyone would miss them.
This is probably true tbh.

>Overall, an OP should have some degree agency in deleting their own threads, but he's just unable to do so because his password has since changed.
Ordinarily I'd agree, and if this were any other user making a similar request we'd likely just honor it. You have to understand though that this guy is a special case, and by "special" I do in fact mean short-bus special.

The amount of drama and bullshit generated on this site by this one guy has just been unreal. Even if you've been following the drama closely, you still have no idea just how bad things really are. Have you ever seen that old 4chan screencap of moot complaining about Australians, talking about how he wishes he could just rangeban the entire continent because 90% of the shitposts come from there? That's basically Nigel. Nigel is the entire continent of Australia distilled into the personality of one human being. Even that may be giving him too much credit. Aussies on 4chan can at least be funny. Nigel is occasionally good for laughs, but he's never been funny on his own.

I'm fairly certain we've had actual user attrition due to Nigel's nonsense. I know for a fact we've had actual staff attrition over it. Staff have quit over disagreements on how to handle this one poster's endless autism constantly flaring up. I personally have invested more time than I'd care to admit into arguing with him, giving him advice, trying to help him with his stupid god-awful writing projects, trying to explain to him why he comes across as so obnoxious to people and what he could do to improve...literally nothing ever sinks in.

>Wouldn't that just make it more tedious? It should be easier to just Control+F the threads that came from the same IP in a certain time periods. It could be over in a few minutes.
Again, if this were any other user we were talking about I'd agree with you here. However, with Nigel, it's just never going to be over. He's never going to fix himself and he's never going to go away. If we delete his threads he'll just be back in another week or two posting the same kind of garbage. There's nothing to be gained from acceding to his demands, and his demands are unreasonable for reasons that I and Lotus have already detailed.

Anyway, as an aside I went ahead and unpinned the threads from /ub/ since that was probably overkill done in a fit of anger. They'll fall off the catalog in their own due time if no one replies. Beyond that, Nigel is on his own.

Are any of the admins/mods globohomo assets? I remember Ninjas mentioning that a mod was an attorney (presumably Elway) and I know that Canuck honeypots are pretty common, if 420chan and others can be used as examples. Is 'Pupper' an RCMP asset?
This place seems really fishy asking for my upcoming KF thread.

>>7764
>my upcoming KF thread
What is that?

>>7764
>Are any of the admins/mods globohomo assets?
If we said no, would you believe us?

>>7764
Testing apparent unban, or failure of ban to apply to current phone.
Yes, one of staff is a prosecuting attorney. Fun fact, he's the reason the site is insular against legal issues. He's still a bag of dicks tho.
To my knowledge, no one of staff is a globohomo.
Can criticize all of staff (not that anyone cares) but to my recollection, Elway has never misrepresented himself.
>Hurr, ur just namefagging
Try me. I'll be happy to vpn-unleash Thez just to prove a point. That goes for staff as well.

>>7767
Glad to have you around Mr.

>>7767
Dude, are you still mad about the gay porn shoops? I need a job and I live less than an hour away from you. I can't go back to The Cheesecake Factory after the things I've done.
Let's bury the hatchet. Let me into Ram Ranch.

>>7769
I wasn't mad to begin with, I think it made (you) look foolish instead of me
>>7768
No u fren

4cc Babies start today, I think MLP is playing, but I'm not certain. I'd bake, but working

I would like to post the following picrel to remind all those whiny niggers that complaining while posting nothing is the ultimate faggotry.
Just saying.

Pupper Woff can you add a toggle in the options menu that disables out going links?
Or an out going message page confirming that a link is clicked.
Thanks for listening.

>>7785
I will add that. Might take a little while as I am traveling at the moment. But I will see what I can do from here if I find time.

>>7786
Thank you. No worries however long it takes works I don't mind this being a backburner project. Months or years is alright with me.

>>7787
Should not take that long. But might be a month or two until I get time to add it (but I will see if I get to do it earlier).

I miss the meme spamming.

>>7867
Nobody else does. Did you know that?

>>7868
Kinda, I had some feedback before.

>>7868
Ok, I go to study C meantime.

>>7869
Most anons probably wouldn't care if you chose higher quality content instead of spamming recycled faceboomer memes. Otherwise, it shits up the site and makes it a pain in the ass to find decent kahntent. May as well hang out with the bots, feds, and discord trannies on 4cuck at that point.
Just some constructive criticism, Anon.

Can we range ban Vietnam? That's where all the CP spam is coming from.

While we are at it could we also range ban Israel?

>>7957
You know what proxies and VPNs are. Right?

>>7957
Pupper can give you a better and more technical answer, but my understanding is that because we hash user IPs we are unable to rangeban. If we stopped hashing IPs we would be able to cut down on the spam, but it would also mean that there would be a record of every user's posts that could be correlated to a real IP and potentially expose the user, in the event that the site was ever compromised or the Feds demanded our logs, or something like that. Basically it's a tradeoff between convenience and security.

>>7959
I'm a mod on another board and we get the same spam as any other of similar size and software, and as far as I can tell there's no consistent pattern in the IPs that post short women pix. The third world countries from which this spam comes that didn't get real internet going until recently don't have large sequential ranges for their ISPs, but rather a scatter of random leftover IPs. The only thing all the IPs do have in common though is what >>7958 suggests; our lookup system says the IPs that post the pizza are all registered in a VPN database. So even if rangebans were possible, it wouldn't do much to quell the spam.

>>7960
>>7959
Imo, the only way to control CP spam is to fill gaps in active moderation, either by appointing more mods or by having the existing mods divide their workloads/hours more efficiently. There is quite visibly a "graveyard shift" in the late evening and early morning where CP lingers for hours because mods are asleep; if there were at least mod active at that time every night it wouldn't stay up.

Short question.
The post >>>/sp/21367 → might actually belong to the Garbage Can thread at >>>/mlpol/362938 → but given that that thread is not wanted, then I didn't bump it and posted at /sp/ instead.
So, is that fine?

>>7964
/sp/ is a shitpost board. It doesn't matter what gets posted there.

>>7965
Understood.

Gentlecolts, I was thinking about how much energy you engaged to oppose me yesterday, pretty impressive indeed. So I'll retreat for a while to give (you) some breathing room and time to temper your animosity.

>>7979
Kindly don't pretend to act retarded or illiterate.

>>7980
I knew it that my intentions would be misconstrued!
Well, be well and calm down, in the end, everypony has the right to shitpost, remember that.

>>7981
Execution could use work. /mlpol/ is a high quality site.
The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Riveting engagement using observations, shitposts, humor and questions do work.
And this is like the friendly mono-'ethnic' horspainter enthusiast neighborhood of chat sites, high quality no redditards or shills or jdf in sight amidst a people would engage intellectually with intellectual posts.

>>7982
>The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Yes, it works pretty well for a while, but I see the exhaustion.
F

>>7979
>I'll retread for a while
>>7981
>two hours later
Welcome back
https://youtu.be/CUwCmh2J2N4

>>7984
Okay. Bye.