Questions That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread.
What are the bump limits for each board?
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
File (): 9CEA79F1FED271E539E44FCE54F3B09A-815297.jpg (796.2 KB, 1000x707, mad max.jpg)
396 replies and 107 files omitted.
File (): 40842EE767EC3380DDAB5A3D6BC51656-54057.jpg (52.8 KB, 1024x1024, seed28282.jpg)
File (): 682CA37FE0D4A332DD0B43A9F5751C1A-75128.png (73.4 KB, 1280x720, 6424795.png)
>>7981
Execution could use work. /mlpol/ is a high quality site.
The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Riveting engagement using observations, shitposts, humor and questions do work.
And this is like the friendly mono-'ethnic' horspainter enthusiast neighborhood of chat sites, high quality no redditards or shills or jdf in sight amidst a people would engage intellectually with intellectual posts.
Execution could use work. /mlpol/ is a high quality site.
The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Riveting engagement using observations, shitposts, humor and questions do work.
And this is like the friendly mono-'ethnic' horspainter enthusiast neighborhood of chat sites, high quality no redditards or shills or jdf in sight amidst a people would engage intellectually with intellectual posts.
Anonymous
No.7983
File (): 0BDBD7D422108E0156A38E3CF6200BC8-5676273.gif (5.4 MB, 461x258, concern.gif)
>>7982
>The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Yes, it works pretty well for a while, but I see the exhaustion.
F
>The intentions to increase post count via adversarial techniques isn't sustainable.
Yes, it works pretty well for a while, but I see the exhaustion.
F
Anonymous
No.7989
>7979
>7981
>7985
If you're gonna make this thread about your ego too, then let's rename it to /FTDDTOT/.
>7981
>7985
If you're gonna make this thread about your ego too, then let's rename it to /FTDDTOT/.
>>7785
Working on the link disabling in JS (or rather turn links to clickable links).
Going to need some extra work to get Media embedding working in conjunction as I for some reason were transforming links to clickable when generating the pages and not using JS (I probably had some reasoning behind it when I did it). So I am changing how it is done on backend and moving the link generation to frontend.
But just wanted to give update that it should be done in not too long, I just have to do some testing and hopefully not too many areas will be affected by moving link transforming to frontend (javascript).
Working on the link disabling in JS (or rather turn links to clickable links).
Going to need some extra work to get Media embedding working in conjunction as I for some reason were transforming links to clickable when generating the pages and not using JS (I probably had some reasoning behind it when I did it). So I am changing how it is done on backend and moving the link generation to frontend.
But just wanted to give update that it should be done in not too long, I just have to do some testing and hopefully not too many areas will be affected by moving link transforming to frontend (javascript).
Anonymous
No.8020
File (): 1673ECB3FDCDC4477485EC80D4488C00-117545.gif (114.8 KB, 500x500, 1673ECB3FDCDC4477485EC80D4488C00-117545.gif)
File (): 55118E368DF6872AE9BC7AD8417479F0-7583.jpg (7.4 KB, 201x255, DE17582A193313A23D75AA36AEEA34EF-7565.jpg)
>>8019
Super, thanks Pupper.
using No JS by only using the backend sounds like a feature for older browsers... As in positively ancient or esoteric ones.
Super, thanks Pupper.
using No JS by only using the backend sounds like a feature for older browsers... As in positively ancient or esoteric ones.
File (): BA737F2D675BC6AB0338A6A7D2BBECB6-5987862.jpg (5.7 MB, 3264x2448, 693f1ce5-cc86-48aa-b8d4-4902acdb12d0.jpg)
So, are y'all gonna ban/404-prompt me - again - if I start arguing that horsefuckers are de-facto furries?
Like last time?
Like last time?
>>8268
Maybe phrase the OP as a question, so that it opens the floor to debate.
And if you think it's too shitposty from /mlpol/, /sp/ should be fair game. They let the resident boomer post his general threads there.
Maybe phrase the OP as a question, so that it opens the floor to debate.
And if you think it's too shitposty from /mlpol/, /sp/ should be fair game. They let the resident boomer post his general threads there.
File (): 02F111301AECDF8212748ED424724959-100930.png (98.6 KB, 707x682, anonfilly - sad.png)
>>8268
>So, are y'all gonna ban/404-prompt me - again
Heh, no wonder this site is dead. If the dissenters are gagged and banished... /s
BTW, this is not an endorsement of furries or their degeneracy.
>So, are y'all gonna ban/404-prompt me - again
Heh, no wonder this site is dead. If the dissenters are gagged and banished... /s
BTW, this is not an endorsement of furries or their degeneracy.
Anonymous
No.8273
>>8272
In fairness, it (the ban/404) was evidently temporary. Additionally, as assholes are concerned I AM exceptional, both historically (wrt site) and generally. While not excusable, the decision was understandable.
In fairness, it (the ban/404) was evidently temporary. Additionally, as assholes are concerned I AM exceptional, both historically (wrt site) and generally. While not excusable, the decision was understandable.
File (): 6059A468C9F6ACA84BA734B5B7E1CEF3-1259460.gif (1.2 MB, 329x406, caption-3.gif)
Why spamming /sp/ is allowed with threads that are clearly posted to cause disruption? Is board sabotage funny perhaps?
Another question. Is the responsible already banned? I don't see the management taking action at all, the threads are still up, like they were posted by it.
Another question. Is the responsible already banned? I don't see the management taking action at all, the threads are still up, like they were posted by it.
>>8277
I’m assuming you’re talking about the guy posting all the Hi Anon threads.
If he were doing the same thing on the main board the threads would be deleted. /sp/ is generally a looser board more conducive to funposting. Also, the only active threads there at present are a random meme dump thread, a random link dump thread, and a mildly entertaining troll thread about whether or not horsefuckers are furries. No huge loss if any of that junk gets bumped out of the catalog.
> Is the responsible already banned?
No.
I’m assuming you’re talking about the guy posting all the Hi Anon threads.
If he were doing the same thing on the main board the threads would be deleted. /sp/ is generally a looser board more conducive to funposting. Also, the only active threads there at present are a random meme dump thread, a random link dump thread, and a mildly entertaining troll thread about whether or not horsefuckers are furries. No huge loss if any of that junk gets bumped out of the catalog.
> Is the responsible already banned?
No.
>>8278
>I’m assuming you’re talking about the guy posting all the Hi Anon threads.
Yes.
>Is the responsible already banned?
>No.
The responsible by posting simultaneous multiple threads obviously looks to mess the catalog up. That is not fun posting, but it has a clear malicious intent. He did it before at /mlpol/ and after killing that board is doing it now at /sp/ where most of the action is happening.
>I’m assuming you’re talking about the guy posting all the Hi Anon threads.
Yes.
>Is the responsible already banned?
>No.
The responsible by posting simultaneous multiple threads obviously looks to mess the catalog up. That is not fun posting, but it has a clear malicious intent. He did it before at /mlpol/ and after killing that board is doing it now at /sp/ where most of the action is happening.
>>8279
> The responsible by posting simultaneous multiple threads obviously looks to mess the catalog up.
Again, there’s not much going on there that he can mess up. /sp/ is basically this site’s /b/, it’s designed to be anarchic and all threads should be viewed as temporary.
> He did it before at /mlpol/ and after killing that board is doing it now at /sp/ where most of the action is happening
It happened once before on /mlpol/ to my recollection. As I explained, on that board the quality control is tighter, so the threads he posted were either deleted or moved. It did not “kill the board” or even have much of an effect; the issue was dealt with and that was that.
> That is not fun posting, but it has a clear malicious intent.
I can’t speak as to the user’s intent, but I can confirm he is a regular site user and not an invader causing trouble. Again, since this behavior took place on /sp/, it’s not really breaking any rules or causing serious trouble, so I see no reason for staff action here.
> The responsible by posting simultaneous multiple threads obviously looks to mess the catalog up.
Again, there’s not much going on there that he can mess up. /sp/ is basically this site’s /b/, it’s designed to be anarchic and all threads should be viewed as temporary.
> He did it before at /mlpol/ and after killing that board is doing it now at /sp/ where most of the action is happening
It happened once before on /mlpol/ to my recollection. As I explained, on that board the quality control is tighter, so the threads he posted were either deleted or moved. It did not “kill the board” or even have much of an effect; the issue was dealt with and that was that.
> That is not fun posting, but it has a clear malicious intent.
I can’t speak as to the user’s intent, but I can confirm he is a regular site user and not an invader causing trouble. Again, since this behavior took place on /sp/, it’s not really breaking any rules or causing serious trouble, so I see no reason for staff action here.
Anonymous
No.8281
File (): 7AE604643D41CCA0D2C7928A986DB175-660662.png (645.2 KB, 1920x1080, Twiligh - not impressed.png)
>>8277
>Why spamming /sp/ is allowed
"Spam" threads like HI ANON have been native /sp/ content since its conception. It's only in recent years that it's become full of e-celeb threads, generals and other dubiously policy-legal threads.
>>8279
>obviously looks to mess the catalog up
Now the catalog has ponies on it. Instead of completely-dead non-pony threads. An improvement, imo.
>killing that board
As if, lmao.
>where most of the action is happening
Only like two or three posters even post to the random generals that take up /sp/'s front page. It is not most of the site's content.
>Why spamming /sp/ is allowed
"Spam" threads like HI ANON have been native /sp/ content since its conception. It's only in recent years that it's become full of e-celeb threads, generals and other dubiously policy-legal threads.
>>8279
>obviously looks to mess the catalog up
Now the catalog has ponies on it. Instead of completely-dead non-pony threads. An improvement, imo.
>killing that board
As if, lmao.
>where most of the action is happening
Only like two or three posters even post to the random generals that take up /sp/'s front page. It is not most of the site's content.
>>8280
>Again, there’s not much going on there that he can mess up. /sp/ is basically this site’s /b/,
Lotus still banned me for trolling.
>Again, there’s not much going on there that he can mess up. /sp/ is basically this site’s /b/,
Lotus still banned me for trolling.
Anonymous
No.8284
>>8283
I'm not behind the hi anon threads btw. I simply trolled around in the furry thread and that got me banned.
I'm not behind the hi anon threads btw. I simply trolled around in the furry thread and that got me banned.
Anonymous
No.8285
File (): 176CBEAAB60948325A96728AA86F2B62-688333.png (672.2 KB, 1000x1159, 1343710.png)
>>8279
>looks to mess the catalog up
On what basis do you say this? How is the catalog worse than it was before?
>looks to mess the catalog up
On what basis do you say this? How is the catalog worse than it was before?
>>8282
>"Spam" threads like HI ANON have been native /sp/ content since its conception.
<He doesnt know Hi Anon threads were censured
>It is not most of the site's content
By post count? Not counting Lotus' pony dating sim, that is
>>8286
Worse is a matter of perspective. You dont want mine.
>>8287
<He also doesnt know
Not the thread for it.
Serious question; I wont claim the furry thread isnt deaigned to rustle jimmies, but the YT spam is lgbt-tier obfuscation. I assume cuz "its /sp/" that its 'acceptable', and if so fine. Is there a line on /sp/, and if so, where is that line? (illegal contrnt, obvs not acceptable)
>"Spam" threads like HI ANON have been native /sp/ content since its conception.
<He doesnt know Hi Anon threads were censured
>It is not most of the site's content
By post count? Not counting Lotus' pony dating sim, that is
>>8286
Worse is a matter of perspective. You dont want mine.
>>8287
<He also doesnt know
Not the thread for it.
Serious question; I wont claim the furry thread isnt deaigned to rustle jimmies, but the YT spam is lgbt-tier obfuscation. I assume cuz "its /sp/" that its 'acceptable', and if so fine. Is there a line on /sp/, and if so, where is that line? (illegal contrnt, obvs not acceptable)
>>8288
><He doesnt know Hi Anon threads were censured
No?
I was there the whole time. When were the censored?
>By post count?
By users.
Post count alone doesn't make it the majority of most of it is one guy.
>You dont want mine
Try me.
><He doesnt know Hi Anon threads were censured
No?
I was there the whole time. When were the censored?
>By post count?
By users.
Post count alone doesn't make it the majority of most of it is one guy.
>You dont want mine
Try me.
Anonymous
No.8290
>>8288
>I wont claim the furry thread isnt deaigned to rustle jimmies
Flooding /sp/, possibly to slide a thread you don't like is one thing. Banning an user because he trolled you is another. I remember you got a lot of shit for abusing your authority as a mod.
>I wont claim the furry thread isnt deaigned to rustle jimmies
Flooding /sp/, possibly to slide a thread you don't like is one thing. Banning an user because he trolled you is another. I remember you got a lot of shit for abusing your authority as a mod.
Anonymous
No.8295
Thats it from me ITT, head to the pony pub if u wanna hear. Not trying to derail, and not trying to make it about me.
Srsly just trying to avoid getting banned - again - for trolling about ponies being furries which they are btw
Srsly just trying to avoid getting banned - again - for trolling about ponies being furries which they are btw
Why is the maximum threads per hour so low, but the bump limits so high?
>>8296
Spam protection measure. A bot can't be set up to post thousands of threads that we would have to combat as it keeps posting.
Spam protection measure. A bot can't be set up to post thousands of threads that we would have to combat as it keeps posting.
Anonymous
No.8299
>>8298
It apparently is if you are hitting the limit and people are complaining. Just spread out your posts a bit and it won't be hit.
It apparently is if you are hitting the limit and people are complaining. Just spread out your posts a bit and it won't be hit.
>>8288
>Where is the line drawn?
Honestly, it's all pretty fuzzy as to where the line is drawn.
In general, on /mlpol/ the standard is intent. Is a post, or series of posts, intended to disrupt? Autism is generally allowed, although when it gets to the point that it completely derails threads and is intolerable, it isn't.
On /sp/, we're more lenient in general. It's more of a question of what is tolerable. The "hi anon" threads, the "bronies are furry" crap, and the youtube links are all questionable.
It isn't a settled question.
>Where is the line drawn?
Honestly, it's all pretty fuzzy as to where the line is drawn.
In general, on /mlpol/ the standard is intent. Is a post, or series of posts, intended to disrupt? Autism is generally allowed, although when it gets to the point that it completely derails threads and is intolerable, it isn't.
On /sp/, we're more lenient in general. It's more of a question of what is tolerable. The "hi anon" threads, the "bronies are furry" crap, and the youtube links are all questionable.
It isn't a settled question.
Anonymous
No.8301
>>8296
Well anon if you look through your ghost threads you've been spamming you'll see there's practically no posts in them.
Well anon if you look through your ghost threads you've been spamming you'll see there's practically no posts in them.
Anonymous
No.8305
>>8292
Oh, you mean trying to get Nigel - my legit FRIEND - to stop shitting up the board with his sperging? Yes, I used mod powers to try and get him to post acceptably
Oh, you mean trying to get Nigel - my legit FRIEND - to stop shitting up the board with his sperging? Yes, I used mod powers to try and get him to post acceptably
>>8304
At least you got warned. Lotus kicked me out without any notice. I guess he must be getting desperate.
At least you got warned. Lotus kicked me out without any notice. I guess he must be getting desperate.
Anonymous
No.8312
>>8309
And yet, if you happen to rub that guy the wrong way, he'll swing the hammer ban in no time. No matter if its /sp/ we're talking about.
And yet, if you happen to rub that guy the wrong way, he'll swing the hammer ban in no time. No matter if its /sp/ we're talking about.
Okay Ninjas, you've finally gotten what you wanted.
I know I live rent free in your head, and to you I'm the author of all bad things that happen to you, or something, but for the record: Fasces wanted to ban you from nearly the beginning, Elway wanted to ban you since last night, I was the last "yes" vote with Pupper not saying anything on the matter. Elway made the ban.
>>8308
>Samefags 3 different posts, posts multiple unequivocal bait posts against site users generally, and has a consistently hostile attitude throughout
I know I live rent free in your head, and to you I'm the author of all bad things that happen to you, or something, but for the record: Fasces wanted to ban you from nearly the beginning, Elway wanted to ban you since last night, I was the last "yes" vote with Pupper not saying anything on the matter. Elway made the ban.
>>8308
>Samefags 3 different posts, posts multiple unequivocal bait posts against site users generally, and has a consistently hostile attitude throughout
>>8315
>Nothing I do is wrong so long as its /sp/
I don't care to argue with you. Boom Boom has been banned for less in /sp/.
>>8316
We've been over this drama many times over the past 5 years, and we're not doing it anymore, which is what I said to Ninjas.
I'm not relitigating ancient shit.
If there's any confusion; Ninjas was banned for using the report system to make threats to staff, and for posting his furry troll thread in /mlpol/.
>Nothing I do is wrong so long as its /sp/
I don't care to argue with you. Boom Boom has been banned for less in /sp/.
>>8316
We've been over this drama many times over the past 5 years, and we're not doing it anymore, which is what I said to Ninjas.
I'm not relitigating ancient shit.
If there's any confusion; Ninjas was banned for using the report system to make threats to staff, and for posting his furry troll thread in /mlpol/.
The Hi Anon thread have served their purpose. Enough of them have been posted, and we may start trimming a few of them should Elway deem it so
>>8317
Nope, that was spam mostly. And he was warned. Speaking of which, time to keep the same energy with our current spammer. Don't you think?
Nope, that was spam mostly. And he was warned. Speaking of which, time to keep the same energy with our current spammer. Don't you think?
Anonymous
No.8320
Should we also ban the YouTube link spammer? Booms was banned for less. Oh, that's right, he's Elway I think. Better forget about that.
File (): C7116415E1519EB0E9D0789085763936-1024213.png (1.0 MB, 1125x787, 1565910.png)
>>8319
>Speaking of which, time to keep the same energy with our current spammer. Don't you think?
Hell yeah. Hi Anon nigger must be dealt with.
>Speaking of which, time to keep the same energy with our current spammer. Don't you think?
Hell yeah. Hi Anon nigger must be dealt with.
>>8321
Who decides what's too spicy for /sp/ anyways. As long as it is perfectly legal. It can't be how butthurt any given mod is.
Who decides what's too spicy for /sp/ anyways. As long as it is perfectly legal. It can't be how butthurt any given mod is.
Anonymous
No.8327
File (): D64C8BF2714EB4BFE98CBE8C3544291F-1321384.gif (1.3 MB, 1280x720, tc693b1_5qF4iB8.gif)
File (): 050E4884ABBD2726D136D1FACD9B2099-177176.png (173.0 KB, 420x420, 1499327209672.png)
>More Hi Anon threads
Alright, time to cull the herd. The Aryanne thread is cute, so I'm deleting the griffin instead
Alright, time to cull the herd. The Aryanne thread is cute, so I'm deleting the griffin instead
>hi anon threads verboten
>generals and e-celeb threads get to stay
We live in a society.
>generals and e-celeb threads get to stay
We live in a society.
>>8330
>hi anon threads verboten
That's a lie. There are enough of those threads, and more of them are clogging the board. The poster knows that and doublesdown instead of stop for common sense's sake.
>hi anon threads verboten
That's a lie. There are enough of those threads, and more of them are clogging the board. The poster knows that and doublesdown instead of stop for common sense's sake.
Anonymous
No.8334
Welcum to your grave staff of Thoma. You will not be missed.
>rent free
Fifth time you use the same cope. In any case, the month-long ban says I got real pissed.
Fifth time you use the same cope. In any case, the month-long ban says I got real pissed.
Anonymous
No.8337
>>8333
>clogging the board
Clogging the board from what? Dead threads that have been on the catalog for 4+ years?
>clogging the board
Clogging the board from what? Dead threads that have been on the catalog for 4+ years?
>>8339
>implying the ride ever ends
It is actually (you) who wants to end the ride for everypony else with those threads.
>implying the ride ever ends
It is actually (you) who wants to end the ride for everypony else with those threads.
>>8344
Perhaps, and yet they enriched the catalog with assorted themes. Hi Anon threads don't do that.
Perhaps, and yet they enriched the catalog with assorted themes. Hi Anon threads don't do that.
>>8339
Just throwing this out there, if you want to screw with boom-boom without disrupting the rest of the site, you can always just dump the Hi Anon posts directly into his containment threads until they hit bump limit.
Just throwing this out there, if you want to screw with boom-boom without disrupting the rest of the site, you can always just dump the Hi Anon posts directly into his containment threads until they hit bump limit.
File (): 6D259B12AB326D9946ACBB1D5E47FE7F-375835.gif (367.0 KB, 400x257, why would you post that.gif)
>>8346
>you can always just dump the Hi Anon posts directly into his containment threads until they hit bump limit.
>you can always just dump the Hi Anon posts directly into his containment threads until they hit bump limit.
Anonymous
No.8350
File (): F65C01403B580EE8C9BB15278210B228-715671.png (698.9 KB, 8725x6544, anonfilly - smug.png)
I find it humorous that the two spam posters are fighting over the right to spam in only the way each sees fit.
Anonymous
No.8352
>>8345
>they enriched the catalog with assorted themes
So dead threads are to be kept around just for show?
I didn't see you bumping any of the dead threads when the hi Anon threads were being posted.
>they enriched the catalog with assorted themes
So dead threads are to be kept around just for show?
I didn't see you bumping any of the dead threads when the hi Anon threads were being posted.
>>8355
You both are literally identifying each other as spam. It isn't coincidence my friend. You are different forms of the same problem. You both need to post what you want and damn anyone that says to compromise the style. You are literally the same.
You both are literally identifying each other as spam. It isn't coincidence my friend. You are different forms of the same problem. You both need to post what you want and damn anyone that says to compromise the style. You are literally the same.
File (): EEDCB89D61ED94E3695863CAEB149689-27884.mp4 (27.2 KB, Resolution:480x444 Length:00:00:00, eww gross.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>8356
>general dumps where virtually no conversation
And why is that. So you would blame the poster instead of the readers?
>general dumps where virtually no conversation
And why is that. So you would blame the poster instead of the readers?
>>8361
>""""news"""
>implying
There is a reason why hardly anyone ever replies to the links in those generals.
>""""news"""
>implying
There is a reason why hardly anyone ever replies to the links in those generals.
>>8359
>>8360
In both of your cases, both of your posting styles are suitable in moderation, which is the main contention. Why this is a problem for you both, I have no idea.
News threads are nice when you don't desire to make generals on the site where the only discussion goes into three or four threads where one poster dominates, actively squashing debate because OP knows best.
Hi Anon is cute, but for fuck sake, you can't have a million of them and get replies on any significant portion of them. Tone it down.
>>8360
In both of your cases, both of your posting styles are suitable in moderation, which is the main contention. Why this is a problem for you both, I have no idea.
News threads are nice when you don't desire to make generals on the site where the only discussion goes into three or four threads where one poster dominates, actively squashing debate because OP knows best.
Hi Anon is cute, but for fuck sake, you can't have a million of them and get replies on any significant portion of them. Tone it down.
>>8358
>>8359
The problem is that your excessive autism prevents you from evaluating reader interest. You post content that nobody is engaging with because they're not interested, and instead of tailoring your content to make it better, you double down and insist that everyone else is somehow at fault for not being interested.
If you ever run out of Facebook memes, you could always get a UK proxy and start ranting about Naruto.
>>8359
The problem is that your excessive autism prevents you from evaluating reader interest. You post content that nobody is engaging with because they're not interested, and instead of tailoring your content to make it better, you double down and insist that everyone else is somehow at fault for not being interested.
If you ever run out of Facebook memes, you could always get a UK proxy and start ranting about Naruto.
>>8366
The reason why nobody replies to those posts is because the conversation is not worth having.
A bunch of one-off posts in a single thread whom nobody replies to is by volume the same as a bunch of individual threads with no replies.
At least the HI ANON threads have ponies in them.
The reason why nobody replies to those posts is because the conversation is not worth having.
A bunch of one-off posts in a single thread whom nobody replies to is by volume the same as a bunch of individual threads with no replies.
At least the HI ANON threads have ponies in them.
>>8368
>The reason why nobody replies to those posts is because the conversation is not worth having.
Fine. I moved to /sp/. Now leave me alone.
>The reason why nobody replies to those posts is because the conversation is not worth having.
Fine. I moved to /sp/. Now leave me alone.
>>8376
>It's pretty transparent.
For you might be because you see a reflection of your wickery. For me nothing funny has been made.
>It's pretty transparent.
For you might be because you see a reflection of your wickery. For me nothing funny has been made.
Again, I have no idea why the two of you are opposing each other so fiercely. You are two sides of the same coin and you should try to actually team up and learn from each other to make good posts on the site.
File (): 093520C860E6C22CB99488ACA5FCF92B-891619.png (870.7 KB, 894x1010, cute_pony_noises_meme.png)
>>8381
I'm the victim here. I don't suffer from Stockholm Syndrome and I won't cooperate with my oppressor.
I'm the victim here. I don't suffer from Stockholm Syndrome and I won't cooperate with my oppressor.
File (): 0EBD124DB25ABE246063DA8A2261CC1B-521482.jpg (509.3 KB, 1280x1280, 89000a38c93ad0f1833a6b4dea032b8b.jpg)
>>8384
So? You just post more in your thread and it bumps to the top. You have the copy/paste speed to do it too, I have seen your work.
So? You just post more in your thread and it bumps to the top. You have the copy/paste speed to do it too, I have seen your work.
>>8384
Your threads are under attack because they suck, and you are under attack because you keep acting like a little bitch. Welcome to the internet, retard.
Your threads are under attack because they suck, and you are under attack because you keep acting like a little bitch. Welcome to the internet, retard.
Anonymous
No.8391
File (): F8D6ADC381D44583A45287BB493F164B-573467.gif (560.0 KB, 247x482, tumblr_lykcjmgYaQ1rnpo0wo1_400.gif)
>>8392
Yeah. Him saying you suck is an opinion, just like you saying you don't. If you actually worked alongside the site instead of against it, you would be a lot happier and get opinions saying you aren't that bad.
Yeah. Him saying you suck is an opinion, just like you saying you don't. If you actually worked alongside the site instead of against it, you would be a lot happier and get opinions saying you aren't that bad.
File (): 7EE37AD37E786E2C871C01E719F8A2E8-1431136.png (1.4 MB, 4961x6959, uppity.png)
>>8393
>If you actually worked alongside the site instead of against it, you would be a lot happier and get opinions saying you aren't that bad.
Unacceptable.
>If you actually worked alongside the site instead of against it, you would be a lot happier and get opinions saying you aren't that bad.
Unacceptable.
Anonymous
No.8396
>>8392
Mine and just about everyone else's. Notice how nobody is defending you? Notice how almost nobody replies to your threads except you? Seriously, you should just get yourself a UK flag and start posting angry rants about games you don't like, it's the only way to make yourself appear less ridiculous.
Mine and just about everyone else's. Notice how nobody is defending you? Notice how almost nobody replies to your threads except you? Seriously, you should just get yourself a UK flag and start posting angry rants about games you don't like, it's the only way to make yourself appear less ridiculous.
I only use top-quality, high-resolution image macros in my HI ANON threads, an assortment of both niche And popular mares, and make sure not to use redundant images too often. I do not appreciate being compared to the slew of sewage that I'd the resident boomer's Facebook feed.
>>8397
>people will never understand the subtle nuances in the crude finger-paintings I make with my own poop
>I will keep making my poop-paintings to show the phillistines what true art really is
>people will never understand the subtle nuances in the crude finger-paintings I make with my own poop
>I will keep making my poop-paintings to show the phillistines what true art really is
Anonymous
No.8409
File (): EE99149B4C5A8BA1F28E1B1226EA3BA3-561286.png (548.1 KB, 762x1000, 1546897.png)
>>8406
What the fuck.
>>8357
>You both are literally identifying each other as spam. It isn't coincidence my friend. You are different forms of the same problem. You both need to post what you want and damn anyone that says to compromise the style. You are literally the same.
What Anon said.
>>8372
>>8374
... I don't get it.
I don't understand.
This... whole website is one website.
Fuck it.
>>8379
Here's your good idea (You)
>>8408
Sarcasm doesn't translate well through typing.
>>8357
>You both are literally identifying each other as spam. It isn't coincidence my friend. You are different forms of the same problem. You both need to post what you want and damn anyone that says to compromise the style. You are literally the same.
What Anon said.
>>8372
>>8374
... I don't get it.
I don't understand.
This... whole website is one website.
Fuck it.
>>8379
Here's your good idea (You)
>>8408
Sarcasm doesn't translate well through typing.
Anonymous
No.8411
File (): A16C1E5087EEEF1C45C70F077B2EF2FF-97463.jpg (95.2 KB, 1265x1265, BE818401B6B638EF3199C6F7B82D1601-97445.jpg)
Anonymous
No.8412
File (): 793735DEB76F9099A49746821EA59255-43238.jpg (42.2 KB, 280x403, c1urmlhp3g4z.jpg)
>>8416
>>8317
This screencap really does seem to imply that the post was made to /sp/: you can tell by the post number.
Idk if "go rogue" really counts as a threat either. Anons here say worse all of the time; in Minecraft, of course.
>>8317
This screencap really does seem to imply that the post was made to /sp/: you can tell by the post number.
Idk if "go rogue" really counts as a threat either. Anons here say worse all of the time; in Minecraft, of course.
File (): 845B9946A86A339478EFBFBC6AD178CF-308143.png (300.9 KB, 720x1440, 845B9946A86A339478EFBFBC6AD178CF-308143.png)
>>8421
I forgot the image.
Notice how the post number is 22799: that thread was made to /sp/, not /mlpol/.
There's a lot of annoying messages here, and I'm not fond of the topic, but idk what the rule violation is. It's normal to make a new thread once an old one hits bump limit, although he seems to have been mistaken for why the thread slid.
I forgot the image.
Notice how the post number is 22799: that thread was made to /sp/, not /mlpol/.
There's a lot of annoying messages here, and I'm not fond of the topic, but idk what the rule violation is. It's normal to make a new thread once an old one hits bump limit, although he seems to have been mistaken for why the thread slid.
Anonymous
No.8425
>>8422
When was this change made? I saw a TOR poster just last month.
When was this change made? I saw a TOR poster just last month.
Anonymous
No.8426
Will whoever's deleting the posts answer my question about TOR?
Anonymous
No.8427
How long is TOR going to be banned?
Anonymous
No.8429
>>8428
I didn't ask you, tbh.
I didn't ask you, tbh.
Anonymous
No.8431
Oi, jannies.
If you have time to delete posts, you have time to answer my questions.
If you have time to delete posts, you have time to answer my questions.
>>8418
Sadly TOR posting had to temporary be blocked due to some persistent banevading via TOR. Hopefully we can turn it on again soon.
Sadly TOR posting had to temporary be blocked due to some persistent banevading via TOR. Hopefully we can turn it on again soon.
>>8432
We block entire browsers to stop one shitposter? Isn't that a bit excessive? We have native posters who use TOR. How long is this going to last?
We block entire browsers to stop one shitposter? Isn't that a bit excessive? We have native posters who use TOR. How long is this going to last?
Anonymous
No.8435
>>8434
>>8432
Evidently, blocking TOR doesn't even actually stop the poster you're trying to stop, so there's no point in blocking it.
>>8432
Evidently, blocking TOR doesn't even actually stop the poster you're trying to stop, so there's no point in blocking it.
>>8418
TOR was disabled this morning as it was being used for ban evasion, and simultaneously a presumably unrelated samefagging incident with VPNs was occurring.
>>8420
Ban evader posts are deleted.
>>8423
>>8421
Okay? It looked like /mlpol/ when I saw it. It was deleted, presumably by a different moderator, before he was banned. I do not know how many threads like that he made and if it’s the only one.
>go rogue
He made multiple threats in reports, and “go rogue” was not one of them. I am not going to go through the reports and publicly disclose them.
In any event, Ninjas more than earned his ban.
TOR was disabled this morning as it was being used for ban evasion, and simultaneously a presumably unrelated samefagging incident with VPNs was occurring.
>>8420
Ban evader posts are deleted.
>>8423
>>8421
Okay? It looked like /mlpol/ when I saw it. It was deleted, presumably by a different moderator, before he was banned. I do not know how many threads like that he made and if it’s the only one.
>go rogue
He made multiple threats in reports, and “go rogue” was not one of them. I am not going to go through the reports and publicly disclose them.
In any event, Ninjas more than earned his ban.
>>8433
It is similar to when we had to stop persistent CP being posted via Tor. Tor has it's positive and negative sides. One of the dowsides with Tor is that many uses that network in nefarious intents which affects all Tor users.
It is similar to when we had to stop persistent CP being posted via Tor. Tor has it's positive and negative sides. One of the dowsides with Tor is that many uses that network in nefarious intents which affects all Tor users.
Anonymous
No.8440
>>8438
A CP scourge makes it seem like the appropriate response, but blocking it to stop a shitposter ban evader feels like scorched earth, tbh. Just my opinion though.
A CP scourge makes it seem like the appropriate response, but blocking it to stop a shitposter ban evader feels like scorched earth, tbh. Just my opinion though.
Anonymous
No.8441
>>8434
>>8436
>>8439
See, all this is evidence that blocking TOR has not fixed the problem here.
>>8436
>>8439
See, all this is evidence that blocking TOR has not fixed the problem here.
>>8437
>I am not going to go through the reports and publicly disclose them.
You could just describe them if you want. What kind of threats were they?
>I am not going to go through the reports and publicly disclose them.
You could just describe them if you want. What kind of threats were they?
Anonymous
No.8444
>>8437
>simultaneously a presumably unrelated samefagging incident with VPNs was occurring
That's odd. What threads were they in?
>simultaneously a presumably unrelated samefagging incident with VPNs was occurring
That's odd. What threads were they in?
Anonymous
No.8448
What was the samefagging incident related to?
Anonymous
No.8450
If TOR is blocked, what other alt networks are allowed?
Anonymous
No.8452
It has come to my attention that several of the above questions are tangential and disruptive to the conversation. I will later make separate threads, grouped by topic, to continue discussion on these matters elsewhere.
I'm seeing some complaints about JT links.
Can I post a jewtube link in /mlpol/ without Fasces banning me?
Can I post a jewtube link in /mlpol/ without Fasces banning me?
Boom Boom
No.8456
File (): 4E3B67783BB637A6292C24FBFC431B2B-685784.png (669.7 KB, 4410x3000, mlpol - flag.png)
Hello everypony. I'm back after being banished.
May I start again my activities without (((somepony))) kvetching?
May I start again my activities without (((somepony))) kvetching?
>>8726
Can you just not be around here anymore? You always come here, post like shit, then cry out as you strike everyone that criticizes you. Everyone would be happier, including yourself. If you are compelled to be here, you have to follow the rules. If this is beyond your capacity, you will run into the exact same outcome.
Everyone has tried to negotiate with you, repeatedly. It went nowhere by your own fault alone. You have refused to talk on board, on Teatime, with mods, with users, with everyone. You aren't on thin ice anymore. You are in the water. Are you going to tread carefully or plunge?
Can you just not be around here anymore? You always come here, post like shit, then cry out as you strike everyone that criticizes you. Everyone would be happier, including yourself. If you are compelled to be here, you have to follow the rules. If this is beyond your capacity, you will run into the exact same outcome.
Everyone has tried to negotiate with you, repeatedly. It went nowhere by your own fault alone. You have refused to talk on board, on Teatime, with mods, with users, with everyone. You aren't on thin ice anymore. You are in the water. Are you going to tread carefully or plunge?
File (): FA0E9324AA46A6EF065CE8D57B1E8463-180404.png (176.2 KB, 1000x1414, anonfilly - knives.png)
>>8727
>You aren't on thin ice anymore. You are in the water. Are you going to tread carefully or plunge?
>threats
Unacceptable.
>You aren't on thin ice anymore. You are in the water. Are you going to tread carefully or plunge?
>threats
Unacceptable.
File (): F3E60F8C6418A1484DD3BAA9E3A8DC10-477195.png (466.0 KB, 1575x880, 1251248.png)
Anonymous
No.8730
God fucking damnit, the boomer is back. One fucking day after his ban expired.
I was about to drink to his departure.
I was about to drink to his departure.
Anonymous
No.8732
File (): E24FF24D12F16225439000CA37E2BD7A-44067.jpg (43.0 KB, 1024x1196, 1707608056926806.jpg)
>>8726
>May I start again my activities
You mean your endless stream of shitfiller that nopony asked for?
>May I start again my activities
You mean your endless stream of shitfiller that nopony asked for?
File (): 6572F383BCF63E08FF262502925BFA61-50053.png (48.9 KB, 605x989, 6572F383BCF63E08FF262502925BFA61-50053.png)
*looks left and right*
It looks like he's actually gone this time.
A toast!
It looks like he's actually gone this time.
A toast!
File (): C68CA2419C5535CCF976748A5662A622-508727.gif (496.8 KB, 900x600, d74UKg5.gif)
>>8733
>It looks like he's actually gone this time.
Not so fast commie.
I would like to remind everypony that even if a hostile psycho jannie is cockblocking the basic shitposting, this is MY board and always will be.
>It looks like he's actually gone this time.
Not so fast commie.
I would like to remind everypony that even if a hostile psycho jannie is cockblocking the basic shitposting, this is MY board and always will be.
Anonymous
No.8756
File (): 0413080BEAD8B1ACD984A2FC423B4AF6-2011521.png (1.9 MB, 1558x999, 5ed5244bcbfa411a6da8f53f0196267c_9071403337071026118.jpg)
Regarding rule 12 of Policy, that lolicon pornography is not allowed:
Lolicon is defined as sexual depictions of underage females, right? Anime images of young girls that are not sexual are allowed, am i right?
Lolicon is defined as sexual depictions of underage females, right? Anime images of young girls that are not sexual are allowed, am i right?
Anonymous
No.9106
File (): F227CD5FBF06557C16BD7F550A1090E8-79899.jpg (78.0 KB, 1024x646, GC6hDK1WYAA67J-.jpg)
Anonymous
No.9109
>QTDDTOT
y helo thar, fellow /k/ommando. Is /k/ still a magical place?
y helo thar, fellow /k/ommando. Is /k/ still a magical place?
File (): 5411C644F280691385D99794D21FF78F-71161.gif (69.5 KB, 355x355, 7106251.gif)
OMG LMAO THANK U BASED DEV
Anonymous
No.9126
>>9125
At Mlpol, if you don't know why something is the way it is and you don't know or it isn't mentioned, it's probably some sort of a joke or referece for (you) to ask
At Mlpol, if you don't know why something is the way it is and you don't know or it isn't mentioned, it's probably some sort of a joke or referece for (you) to ask
Anonymous
No.9127
sausage sausage sausage Sausage Cring.e C.ringe Cr.inge Cri.nge Crin. ge Cring.e sausage
Anonymous
No.9128
sausage test (CrInG3)
Anonymous
No.9129
File (): 5E450D331F5AE36DF1BCA4B19B7342DF-961059.png (938.5 KB, 984x968, downloadfile.png)
But to put a neat little bow on this one:
When things are a 'particular/funny' way around here, its for two reasons.
The first is for someone to fall victim to it:
Evidently somepony was doing a bit too much "sausage"-posting, and 'whoever' decided "You know what would be funny?,....". And now, anytime somepony DOES decide to opine about what is "sausage", they will get subtly trolled by the site.
But the real keks come when said pony asks about it. Priceless.
When things are a 'particular/funny' way around here, its for two reasons.
The first is for someone to fall victim to it:
Evidently somepony was doing a bit too much "sausage"-posting, and 'whoever' decided "You know what would be funny?,....". And now, anytime somepony DOES decide to opine about what is "sausage", they will get subtly trolled by the site.
But the real keks come when said pony asks about it. Priceless.
396 replies and 107 files omitted.
[View All] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts]Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-400] [401-596] [Next]
596 replies | 153 files | 175 UUIDs | Page 1