>>339036 >Real America’s Voice has been described as a Trump propaganda network by their higher-up producers. And still it is a CIA outlet. No matter if left or right, the operatives are all under the same central command.
>>339038 It has to do with the source of information and thus the credibility of the information contained within the video. >>339052 This site doesn’t contain enough pony art at all. >>339054 But what about that mail-order bride complaining about being unable to find work in Israel?
>>339056 >But what about that mail-order bride complaining about being unable to find work in Israel? I'm not quite sure what this has to do with Polish chads cucking all of Ukraine.
>>339056 >source of information and thus the credibility of the information contained within the video. A broken clock can be right twice a day, a fringe source can still report good news, especially news that doesn't fit the corporate media narrative. Likewise, a "reputable" source can just as easily be manipulated or outright false.
What's important is to do your own research and come to informed conclusions based on the information you've taken in and checked.
>>339062 Probably 2014. Clinton hasn't really made very many public appearances since she lost the election. Also 2014 was when Soros was visibly stirring up shit in Ukraine.
>>339057 This sort of ethnic nationalism is exactly what Russia is trying to defend by invading Ukraine and restoring the USSR. This only begs the question of which ethnicities are allowed to exist in particular regions and why. >>339059 These same news sources could cherry-pick details that favor them and potentially even forge new information. News agencies cannot have agendas and still call themselves news stations. And yes, I am referring to CNN and NBC in this regard as well.
>E. Michael Jones on Russia vs Ukraine >Dr. Jones joins the Gabriel Sprach podcast. Dr. Jones describes the history of conflict Ukraine and how it lead to a puppet government and war. The original video was published on youtube, so words like "holocaust" were removed by the host. Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCezc4X8Zck Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/wGkxCDp2U8oi/
>>339070 >This only begs the question of which ethnicities are allowed to exist in particular regions That question was answered 90 years ago: https://infogalactic.com/info/Holodomor TL;DR: Anyone who isn't pureblood Russia is subhuman trash that deserves extermination.
>>339116 And why are Russians allowed to survive when everyone else is not? >>339118 Then why were the Jews of Ukraine no less affected than everyone else?
>>339070 >ethnic nationalism is exactly what Russia is trying to defend Well, when you put it that way, it sounds based. I don't even care for Russia normally. >USSR That's ultranationalism, not ethnonationalism. >These same news sources could cherry-pick details that favor them and potentially even forge new information. Which is why we as information consumers should always be skeptical of news no matter where it comes from. That doesn't mean that fringe sources should be discarded entirely, it just requires scrutiny and skepticism. >I am referring to CNN and NBC in this regard as well. All the more reason to be skeptical and consider alternative sources.
>>339138 Bruh, did you just open Google scholar and grab the first article you saw without reading it beyond the abstract? I'm not going to pay $25 dollars to read this. Go find a source you can actually cite.
>>339141 Scholarly sources are typically more reputable than news articles. Just ask anyone who asks you to do a research project for school. >>339139 >That's ultranationalism, not ethnonationalism. You seem to be forgetting about the Russifications of the Turkic peoples in Siberia and the Holodomor. >All the more reason to be skeptical and consider alternative sources. Yes, but when said alternative sources flat-out admit that they are supporting one side or the other, they are just as bad. It is time we find alternatives to them.
>>339144 That's not the point, you dipshit. You didn't even post the article. You posted an abstract and tried to pass it off as a proper citation. Also, from that abstract >if not for the Holodomor in Ukraine and Stalin’s repressions of the 1930s, the attitude of the Kyiv gentile population toward the Holocaust would perhaps have been different. People had gotten so used to the suffering of others, victims of the famine and political repression, that they remained mainly passive, silent, and indifferent toward the mass execution of Jews in Babi Yar during the Holocaust. Oh, boo hoo. Jews once again bitching that they're not the center of attention. >"Ignore the other genocides of the 20th century, goyim! God's chosen suffered more than you ever could have."
>>339146 So where else do you learn the theoretical aspects behind the various sciences? Scientists like Dr. Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking would not be where they are today without university educations and the field of astrophysics would not be as far along as it is today.
>>339148 >That's not the point, you dipshit. You didn't even post the article. You posted an abstract and tried to pass it off as a proper citation. Did you not notice the blue “Get access” button? >Oh, boo hoo. Jews once again bitching that they're not the center of attention. No, they were saying they were reminded of their own perils in Nazi Germany.
>>339144 >Russifications of the Turkic peoples in Siberia and the Holodomor. Again, that's ultranationslism, not ethnonationalim. Ethnonationalism is about ethnic sovereignty. You're seeing it right now in Ukraine: without ethnonationalism, the country would have no reason to exist. >they are just as bad Of course it's important to take motivations of the writer into consideration when skeptically reviewing media, but that doesn't mean you should dismiss the writer's claims without considering their points.
>>339152 >“Get access” button? The one that costs $25? Fuck off. I'm having a hard enough time dealing with inflation already. If you paid for it and read it, post the screenshots, ffs. >they were reminded of their own perils in Nazi Germany. Wtf is wrong with your reading comprehension? That is not what they were saying. Also, the Holodomar came before the Holocaust, so they couldn't have been "reminded" in that event, because it was a decade prior.
>>339146 The trick is to read them and check their sources to review them skeptically, and not just take their word for it. Scholarly articles can be decent sources of information, but you have to be a critical thinker and not a positivist NPC.
>whining about holodomor unironically didn't happen but should have Or rather, it didn't specifically target ukrainians, it was a wombo-combo of climate (see: Dust Bowl, China Floods, etc) and retardation of communism, namely trying to collectivize agriculture by taking away the food, the seedstocks, and the farm animals (...during climate-caused famine) and the retarded peasants killing their draft animals in fear of them being taken away, again. Anyone using "Holodomor" in any way seriously needs to be regarded in the same manner as someone using "Holocaust" and "6 million" seriously: as a hack and a parasite trying to get undeserved benefits for an issue they have never been affected by, and/or distract you from real issues, like, in this case, how Zelensky & co keep targetting civilians and committing genocide of Ukrainian people by sending them to the frontlines to be slaughtered against superior enemy forces, instead of either falling back and reinforcing positions, or surrendering wholesale.
>>339159 >retardation of communism, namely trying to collectivize agriculture by taking away the food It's an example of why communism and collectivized agriculture is a terrible idea, namely because the Soviets were able to weaponize the food supplies they controlled to cause planned famines to kill off political dissidents. Collectivized agriculture isn't just bad because of government incompetence, but malignant actions on behalf of a tyrannical governments, which is why people need the agency to grow their own food.
>>339153 >#1 Then how come Nazi Germany and its puppet states sought to take control over most of Continental Europe? What about Italy in the Balkans and Africa? They were only claiming to do right by their ethnic descendants, but this sort of imperialism is rather pointless, especially if their ethnicities formed vast minorities in the regions they conquered if they were not absent entirely. >#2 So if the writer claimed that all ethnic Russians on the planet should be rounded up and interned, would you consider that argument? Would you consider it if he said that we should all abandon meat or adopt Satanism or Discordianism as a state religion? >>339156 >#1 I say if you want to read it, cough up the dough yourself. I may very well have a big enough target on my back as it is, so I can’t risk getting in any more trouble. >>339156 >#2 The Nazis were in control of Germany at around the time it started and they implemented policies that continued to move the goalposts for Jews and continuously drove them out of society little by little. >>339159 >retardation of communism So you acknowledge at least that this is what caused it? Now we all need to realize that Russia has used similar tactics like what they are doing now in the past to screw over the Ukrainians and make sure that this is clearly a violation of Ukrainian civil liberties.
>>339159 >Anyone using "Holodomor" in any way seriously So, you mean, Hitler and the Third Reich? They took it seriously. The Holodomar was one of the events that pushed Germany to become Natsoc, to resist the spread of communism, because they didn't want to get invaded by the Soviets and end up like the Ukrainians did. Fascism originally emerged to counter communism, and National Socialism took the form it did specifically because Hitler was trying to prevent another Holodomar.
>>339162 >The Nazis were in control of Germany at around the time it started and they implemented policies that continued to move the goalposts for Jews and continuously drove them out of society little by little.
>>339162 >Nazi Germany First of all, not all ethnonationalists is Nazi Germany, and not everything Nazi Germany did was ethnonationalists. ]sought to take over central Europe They were at war, for a variety of circumstances. >They were only claiming to do right by their ethnic descendants, but this sort of imperialism is rather pointless, especially if their ethnicities formed vast minorities in the regions they conquered if they were not absent entirely. I feel the same way about Israel. Which is why I drew the distinction. >So if the writer claimed that all ethnic Russians on the planet should be rounded up and interned, would you consider that argument? Sure. I probably wouldn't agree because that sounds like a soy-tier argument, but it doesn't really matter where it comes from. >I say if you want to read it, cough up the dough yourself. I don't even believe you read it. Pics or it didn't happen. >implemented policies that continued to move the goalposts for Jews and continuously drove them out of society little by little. Good.
>>339163 And now look at what happened. Much of the policies that communism advocated for were in national socialist policy: the nationalizations of businesses and farms, long, grueling hours with little pay increase, dissenters being punished by death, and the list goes on and on. I don’t like either of them and think that implementing either would only end badly for everyone. >>339164 And? Is Russia going to round up its ethnic Ukrainians and Jews to execute them in gulags?
>>339170 >Much of the policies that communism advocated for were in national socialist policy: the nationalizations of businesses and farms, long, grueling hours with little pay increase, dissenters being punished by death, and the list goes on and on. You clearly don't know the first thing about national socialism or ethnonationalism. >Jews to execute them in gulags? Hopefully.
>>339169 >I feel the same way about Israel. Israel is a different story, though. They lay claim to the Gaza Strip and West Bank to protect their territorial integrity, otherwise, they would simply stop existing at the hands of terrorist groups and a mass evacuation of Israeli refugees would occur and only add to the current Ukrainian refugee crisis. Israel expanding its territory beyond its current claims has no basis in protecting its own existence or those of any other nation or people, especially since practically all Jews in the Middle East live in Israel. >I don't even believe you read it. >Pics or it didn't happen. And I do not want to get in trouble with the law for copyright infringement here. Plus, citations of premium content material without showing pictures of it happens all the time in other news articles and academic sources… without showing pictures of the material, even. >>339173 >Hopefully. And if the authorities determined that the people of your race were to be rounded up and executed instead?
>>339177 >if the authorities determined that the people of your race were to be rounded up and executed instead? I wouldn't be surprised. The government and international community seems hell-bent on destroying the white identity. >Israel is a different story, though. Rules for the but not for me. Typically Jews >Israel expanding its territory beyond its current claims has no basis in protecting its own existence or those of any other nation or people, especially since practically all Jews in the Middle East live in Israel. Exactly. They expanded their territory out of GREED. >citations of premium content material without showing pictures of it happens all the time in other news articles and academic sources Exactly why so many news articles are cancerously inaccessibly sourced.
>>339177 >And if the authorities determined that the people of your race were to be rounded up and executed instead? They already have, kike lover >your race Thanks for confirming you aren't White.
>>339179 >I wouldn't be surprised. The government and international community seems hell-bent on destroying the white identity. But it seems as though you would be willing to accept this, given your stance on the legitimization of ethnic cleansing. >Exactly why so many news articles are cancerously inaccessibly sourced. But good luck convincing the millions of journalists out there to change their standards based on one opinion alone. >>339180 For all you know about me, I have pasty white Irish skin that turns red the moment sunlight contacts it.
>>339181 >journalists Most Journalists are slaves to the Jew-owned corporate media monopoly: mouthpieces of ZOG. Independent investigative journalism is all but dead. >willing to accept this, given your stance on the legitimization of ethnic cleansing. I accept what's good for my own people, even if ethnic cleansing is what it's going to take.
>>339183 For all I know about you, you have the same skin color as I do. And for all any third party knows, even if they were the same, he would still not know what it is. >>339184 So you are accepting of ethnic cleansing and condoning the murder of your own friends and family.
>>339163 >>339162 >>339161 Let me rephrase since you are retarded: All citizens of southern regions of USSR - ukrainians, russians, uzbeks and kazakhs - died to the famile, it was not targetted and anyone whining about "Holodomor" is being a kike by trying to portray failure of communism as dedicated attack on ukrainians. >>339161 In a perfect world that the commies delusionallly believe in where government abuse never happens, it could be a functional idea since collectivized agriculture is a LOT more productive than individual (no fences to reduce usable land, for starters). This is real world, however, and this exact combo of government incompetence and tyrannical actions happens. Also, it wouldn't be any different than a monopolist corporation owning the farmland except for who the monopolist would be. Oh, and by the way, it was the second famine USSR-brand communism caused. The first one was a decade before that, due to exact same actions.
If anything, the closest comparison between "holodomor" is the Chinese famine due to "eradication of the four pests": retarded ideological government actions causing people to die en-masse. Except in their case, it wasn't taking away food, it was killing a major grasshopper predator that they assumed was a seed-eater instead, resulting in grasshoppers overpopulating and going locust. >>339163 Proof of them trying to counter genocide as opposed to trying to counter communism in general. >>339170 >long, grueling hours nevermind that USSR was the first to implement 8-hour workdays lmao
>>339195 But this also created a class imbalance. Also, resources could have very well easily been allocated to save some people more than others. Have you ever seen “Mr. Jones” or heard about North Korean policies of a similar nature?
>>339195 P.S. More non-ukrainians than ukrainians died to these famines, and the deaths map corresponds to agricultural map - which is why concentration of deaths is higher in Ukraine, it was, and still is, extremely farming-focused.
>>339212 And this is coming from a source that does not seem like it has the greatest basis in credibility, considering that they mainly source their own information from known conspiracy theorists and “fake news” outlets.
>>339214 First, the source in pic 1 was the incredulous one. Second, even if this did come from 24 Kanal, then a very great burden must be overcome to verify its authenticity, since Russia could take this information and run with it to delegitimize the Ukrainian cause, especially since Russia is the dominant military and economic power of the region. Third, there was reportedly a translation of this done by an unknown third party. The Ukrainian and Russian words for “to castrate” also mean “to emasculate”, so whoever was translating this may have tried to deliberately make Ukraine look bad by using a poor choice of words.
>Russian ambassador to Bosnia and Herzegovina warns #Bosnia about joining NATO. >Asked by the journalist about his recent statements, he basically says: “Bosnia can join any alliance it wants. We reserve the right to react, and Ukraine is an example of one of our reactions.” https://twitter.com/AnonOpsSE/status/1505296299507306497
>>339223 And I see you are still using a very discredited source who may have an agenda to make Zalensky look bad, make Russia look good, and end innocent Ukrainian, American, and British lives.
>>339239 That "meaning" is retarded, it is in fact 1:1 match for "faggot" and that thing is absolutely a faggot so I applaud them for mocking the retard.
Found this in a book titled Beasts Men and Gods. "Sometimes we came across villages entirely Communistic but very soon we learned to distinguish them. When we entered a village with our horse bells tinkling and found the peasants who happened to be sitting in front of their houses ready to get up with a frown and a grumble that here were more new devils coming, we knew that this was a village opposed to the Communists and that here we could stop in safety. But, if the peasants approached and greeted us with pleasure, calling us “Comrades,” we knew at once that we were among the enemy and took great precautions. Such villages were inhabited by people who were not the Siberian liberty-loving peasants but by emigrants from the Ukraine, idle and drunk, living in poor dirty huts, though their village were surrounded with the black and fertile soil of the steppes. Very dangerous and pleasant moments we spent in the large village of Karatuz. It is rather a town. In the year 1912 two colleges were opened here and the population reached 15,000 people. It is the capital of the South Yenisei Cossacks. But by now it is very difficult to recognize this town. The peasant emigrants and Red army murdered all the Cossack population and destroyed and burned most of the houses; and it is at present the center of Bolshevism and Communism in the eastern part of the Minnusinsk district."
>>339195 >All citizens of southern regions of USSR - ukrainians, russians, uzbeks and kazakhs - died to the famile, it was not targetted and anyone whining about "Holodomor" is being a kike by trying to portray failure of communism as dedicated attack on ukrainians. Nobody said the Holodomar only hurt Ukrainians. The USSR used starvation as a weapon for all of those demographics. Ukraine is just where he got the first idea to try it.
>>339257 His goal isn't to convince you. It's to distract you with pointless arguments and prevent you from having productive discussions with other users. Just hide him.
>>339260 Lenin died in 1924. That was 7 years prior to it. Weaponizing collectivized agriculture intentionally was Stalin's idea. The starvation under Lenin was just communist incompetence.
>>339263 Remember, USSR has caused famine twice, one in 20s, once in 30s, both were natural droughts amplified by retarded choices of government and people.
>>339263 Idk where you heard that. The holodomar was Stalin's little pet project on destroying cultures via starvation so that they would be more accepting of communism, and it was a success for the most part, which is why he tried it again in other parts of the USSR. >>339264 The one in the 20's was retardation. The one in the 30's was by-design.
>>339162 >Now we all need to realize that Russia has used similar tactics like what they are doing now in the past to screw over the Ukrainians and make sure that this is clearly a violation of Ukrainian civil liberties. Like how they genocided the Ukrainians in other ways aside from famine and blamed it on the Germans: https://www.veoh.com/watch/v20343432tdeEzYEE
>>339272 If that actually happened, I would not be surprised. The Nazis were ravish murderers as well, but I would not put it past the Soviets to pin their malevolent actions on other dictatorships to save face.
>>339274 Then where did all of the people from families of ethnic minorities in Europe mysteriously disappear to? And just what are the Dachau and Auschwitz concentration camps doing standing there? Either they were built to serve their purpose or they were hastily built just in time for the Nuremberg Trials in a slapdash manner. Personally, my money’s on the former, since it does not seem that possible to have a building constructed in such slapdash manner and have it last for over 75 years, at least if China’s infrastructure, which was built using a similar mentality, is any indication.
>>339162 >I say if you want to read it, cough up the dough yourself. I may very well have a big enough target on my back as it is, so I can’t risk getting in any more trouble. retarded glownigger thinks hes going to be introuble for contributing to libre genesis
>>339277 >Then where did all of the people from families of ethnic minorities in Europe mysteriously disappear to? They left. > Either they were built to serve their purpose They're purpose was to exist as concentration camps for society's undesirables, which the U.S. also did with the Japanese during WWII (However, that was at the request of the Chinese). Now, as to "Muh six grillion", that's where questions are raised. Even according to "official" estimates, the number of total people killed amounted to two million (Not just the Kikes, everyone killed at the camps). Which is a tenth of the official estimate. Add in the fact those sites have been drastically altered from when they were in operation during the 40's, all present evidence just from basic knowledge of chemistry and physics presents doubts about the claims, and any investigations finding results doubting the narrative can get you arrested as it's illegal to question any aspect of the Holocaust story, and you see the result.
>>339282 >Even according to "official" estimates, the number of total people killed amounted to two million (Not just the Kikes, everyone killed at the camps)
Reminder that Russia originally wanted to join NATO, but decided not to because they wanted priority over countries who "didn't matter": https://archive.ph/VkEYE
>Russians at the Gates of Kiev >Too far to go back, too far to go forward >Everything is going according to plan and is on schedule. At the same time, Kiev has yet to be either taken or encircled, and 2 weeks have passed without measurable gains in that direction. So then was the plan to tie up one-half of the invasion force in the Kiev operation and not have it achieve a strategic objective for 26 days? >In that case, it was a bad plan. >Nobody crafts a plan that says “we’re going to drive very close to the enemy capital and then we’re just going to kind of sit there”. You don’t stop until you’ve crowned your tactical success in advancing 200 miles with the strategic success of covering the last stretch and at least isolating the enemy capital. Not if it’s up to you. https://anti-empire.com/russians-at-the-gates-of-kiev/
>>339295 >heckin wholesome big chungus reddit mods go to Ukraine expecting epic updoots and gold, but all they get is a hypersonic cruise missile to the face
>>339295 >>339300 Checked and I kekked. We should encourage these brave redditors to go fight the evil Nazi, Putler, just like in the protagonists in videogames and superhero movies! Just get them to think of the eternal updoots and the hecking wholesome times they'll have over there.
>>339290 Weird to think that if things had gone a bit differently in the opening years of the 2000s, the entire geopolitical landscape could be totally different. I mean, Russia as a NATO member? Fucking bizarre to imagine.
>>339314 >Weird to think that if things had gone a bit differently in the opening years of the 2000s No kidding. Imagine how different things would be if Bill Clinton never opened the WTO to West Taiwan.
>>339292 must suck to not know that this war is for the WEF. people are dumbfounded at why shit isnt happening. the answer is obvious if you know that the war is fake (not the causalties). they are going by a script. but this isnt special effects.
>>339295 >>339300 Reddit and Globohomo cooperating to take le redditors thirsty for heccin updoots down, everyone. >knowing that Russia uses Internet for targetting >knowing that another bunch of idiots got shelled already >knowing that Russia isn't beyond sending "gifts" to the far west of Ukraine >but nope, the thirst for updoots is stronger
>What Happened to People Who Volunteered to Fight For Ukraine? >The dangers of moral exhibitionism. >Many ‘foreign volunteers’ with zero military training are traveling to Ukraine hopped up on the promise of social media dopamine and being able to express their support for ‘the current thing’. >But some of them are fleeing for their lives or coming home in body bags. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1udDZIByHd4 Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/1udDZIByHd4/
>Fierce fighting tears through buildings in Mariupol >Fierce fighting continues in Mariupol, as seen in exclusive new footage shot by RT Stringer. >One clip shows soldiers coming under heavy fire as they wait for an opportunity to move out. The building they are sheltering in also houses a number of civilians who are taking cover from the fighting in the apartment building’s stairwells. >Other clips show an exchange of gunfire between two burned-out apartment blocks, as the residents take cover. >There were earlier reports of the Ukrainian Army occupying residential buildings in the area. https://odysee.com/FightMariupol_YT5mb:8 Mirror: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fbrXwuin9OcT/
>Tucker Carlson Calls Out Zelensky for Seizing Control of Ukraine’s Media Outlets and Banning Opposition Political Parties! “THIS IS AUTHORITARIANISM, IT’S NOT DEMOCRACY!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oifqp1bJp8Y
>DPR & CHECHEN SOLDIERS FIRING AT UKRAINIAN FACTION IN MARIUPOL >Izvestia correspondent Rodion Severyanov filmed the moment of the battle in Mariupol. The clash occurred on the outskirts of Azovstal, where Ukrainian militants settled. The DPR forces and the Chechen battalion went on the attack. The fighters came across fortified positions. A sniper, a grenade launcher and a tank worked on our strength. As a result of the clash, two nationalists were killed. https://www.bitchute.com/video/LB4nr1C9h720/
>>339469 >>fake war So extrajudicial, premeditated killings of foreign civilians on their own home soil in violation of the sovereignty thereof is not a causus belli?
>>339478 But this doesn’t mean Russia will care about them either. In fact, they may care about them even less if their history of Russification is anything to go by.
>>339329 >coming home in body bags. Lol nope, even on the off chance the artillery and armor these people are up against leave any of these idiots with an intact corpse there's a 0% chance the ukrainians are recovering any bodies, least of all from foreign volunteers
>>339493 >there's a 0% chance the ukrainians are recovering any bodies I agree, in a war only those who control the terrain recover bodies and pieces of them, and that is mostly to avoid sickness.
>>339477 It's not. >>339478 They do care about them, in the same way you care about a bomb you're about to blow up a white family with because you are a filthy jew. Not because you want the bomb to have a safe and long life, but because its an instrumental tool.
>>339502 >implying all Jews want to kill all whites If that were the case, Zalensky would have let Putin’s forces in so they could both have their way.
>>339523 He's probably an ESL tard who failed to specify "personally".
>>339504 >>339506 He let Putin's in and then forced all ukrainian men into draft so that they die against superior force and thin it out in the process, while ukrainian women are fucked by poles/kikes/niggers. It's a genocide that the usual punchthenazis are cheering on.
>>339526 >He let Putin's in and then forced all ukrainian men into draft so that they die against superior force and thin it out in the process, while ukrainian women are fucked by poles/kikes/niggers. It's a genocide that the usual punchthenazis are cheering on Time to take your meds, big guy
>>339557 >try to low effort shill the narrative that a jew cares about if their own or Russia's military or citizens take casualties. >get told 4 separate times by 2-3 people >come back >tell US take our meds.
Yesterday marked the day the state was dealt a heavy blow. Russia, India, china along with all in the east have ultimately rejected dollar. Ever since 1944 the system worked flawlessly but now it is possible that dollar will turn into paper. (although its only a theory)
>>339562 >Ever since 1944 the system worked flawlessly <Except for that one time in the 70's when Nixon illegally took the U.S. off of the gold standard in a vain attempt to stop inflation due to the oil crisis in the Middle East
>>339563 >>339562 Russia moving away from the dollar and India passing arguably narcissistic currency reforms are nothing new. OPEC doing so will leave them with few alternatives if their local currencies are not well-known about or valuable enough. There is the alternative of the petroyuan, though it would take massive reforms of Chinese economic and social policy in order for that to be in place. Countertrade through parking currencies in China could also be an option, though, but I am not sure whether people would be willing to use China as a mediator for trade like this or whether China would allow for foreigners to make up that much of their economy.
>>339588 Because it gives them a surge of power whenever reforms are made and they watch while the people suffer. A previous incident may have involved them getting rid of all notes above a certain value, with people queuing for hours at banks, with some even limiting how many can be let in per day. Much of India’s cash in circulation became worthless after that and people who were just getting by became even worse.
>>339599 I doubt it. There are likely alternatives to using the commodities that could only be purchased with rubles. For example, natural gas is likely not going to be in as high a demand as it used to be in Europe anyway and electric cars may begin to spell the end of ICE cars soon enough. Speaking of which, the Tesla Model Y’s heating pump could potentially be used as an alternative to natural gas entirely.
>>339596 Good. The dollar is fiat currency too. All fiat currencies are garbage. Both dollars and rubles together. Any currency not backed by precious metals or at least Blockchain is worthless.
>>339607 The issue with Bitcoin is that there is a finite amount of it. This will mean that its value will eventually become too high to purchase anything that a typical consumer would be able to afford and it would make little sense to invest. This same phenomenon, known as supply-side deflation, is what happened on farms and at the world’s stock exchanges to bring about the Great Depression.
Goldfinger planned to increase the value of his gold by nukiing Fort Knox. He even used a bit of sarin. Can we have that time-line please. The longer the news-media go pro for Idi-Bin-Zelensky the more I want Putin to win. I am bored with the war already. Its time for solar flare;reversal on the poles;alien attack.
>>339601 Do you really think oil is traded for the citizens? Your beloved "electric cars" run on gas and oil burned in power plants. The factories for "solar power" and "wind turbines" run on oil, and oil is processed to make plastics and other materials mandatory for those. No oil, your entire manufacturing crashes and burns. No gas, your countries black out because wind and solar are not viable and you refuse to move to nuclear.
>>339623 >>339619 It's only required because it doesn't corrode. Platinum can be used for that as well, though it costs more. Also, gold is useful for currencies because it has no inherent value. Gold itself is labor-backed: "look at me, I can afford to spend all that work-hours of myself or my subservients on acquiring something useless and shiny". It's used instead of other things because it's, as mentioned above, resistant to corrosion and so easy to store; it won't go poof like precious woods, steel, et cetera are liable to do. Gemstones are used for the same reason, except they can be much more easily destroyed - just smash them with a rock. >>339628 Why settle for half-solutions? Gamma ray burst today! Sterilize the entire planet in one fell swoop.
>>339630 If fossil fuels fall out of use in transportation, then it would be a major hit to the fossil fuel industry as a whole, since oil would not be able to be used in where it is most. This could cause a deflation in the oil market and make it cheaper to use it for other goods, especially if the supply of it is that large. However, if new restrictions on its use emerge like some states are proposing, then it could possibly cost just as much.
Most mainstreem news is saying Ukraine is winning back land. If that is the case we might as well stop sending them weapons as they do not need anymore. We can also stop sending the body bags, first-aid kits as well. If they are doing so well and need anything else they can fucking well pay for it. Typical pikies always expecting others to pay taxes whilst exempting themselves.
>>339636 They will still need their weapons. Russia is still the dominant military faction in the region and they will need to maintain control of the territories they re-acquired. Should the Second Amendment be repealed if the US has succeeded in the War or 1812 by getting British military bases off of their soil?
In the village of Nikolaevka near Kiev, Russian troops captured a protected buried command post of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 61 Ukrainian servicemen of the command post surrendered, of which more than half were senior officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
>>339611 >The issue with Bitcoin is that there is a finite amount of it. This will mean that its value will eventually become too high to purchase anything that a typical consumer would be able to afford and it would make little sense to invest. That's a legitimate concern with non-fungible assets, but Bitcoin is a digital currency that can be split freely into small decimal units. For example right now the Bitcoin protocol supports transactions in as small as 0.00000001 Bitcoin (commonly nicknamed a "Satoshi"). Even with BTC worth tens of thousands of dollars each right now, a Satoshi still only comes out to 0.00044 USD. For a Satoshi to equal one US cent, BTC would have to climb past $1,000,000. Even if this were to occur, the protocol could be updated to allow smaller divisions of BTC, thus there would be no issue. There are significant issues with cryptocurrency and BTC in particular, but I don't think supply-side deflation is one of them.
>>339644 >Oil is also used for lubrication, fertilizer, plastics, and gas production. And most of those could be replaced with alternatives, though they are not transportation.
>>339645 Do you not understand how much more expensive those "alternatives" are? Different sources of raw materials means processes changes to very picky equipment, aside from the higher cost of other sources of polymers.
>>339645 >>339646 That's also ignoring that many of those "alternatives" have been tried and tested before, with less than appealing results. For example, attempts to make plant-based fabrics and plastics have shown them to be extremely fragile and frail in usage.
I thought it's a very much related issue, as it's not only connected to the current war but also affects horsefuckers directly. So, an anon behind poneb.in, a site that provides a mirror for pastebin greens, including those which were purged from pastebin in 2020, decided that's his moral obligation now and started to block Russian IPs for accessing the site. In his own words >>This is a clear censorship >Yes and no. Its a choice to not service the whole world. Pic very much related. It's from the current Alternative Site Thread on /mlp/
>>339645 Take a moment to count every object in the room you are in that is at least partially made of plastic/polymers. Now consider having to replace every single one of them. It's no simple task to replace oil in the material manufacturing market. Even if it is feasible, it would take decades and cost a fortune.
>>339657 The point seemed to be that even if transportation alone is cut out of what fossil fuels are used for, it still accounts for a vast reduction in their usage and emissions. Fossil fuels are technically a renewable source, but they are being used faster than they are being replaced.
>>339631 Gold is useful as a currency because it can't be produced, only acquired. There's a finite amount of it on earth. It's also useful because it can be melted-down and recobined easily, and made into jewelry and whatnot to give it sentimental value while the material itself has consistent value. As a material, it is also universally recognized for its scarcity among civilized cultures. Gems aren't really as useful in that regard. A lot of their value comes from appearance and other subjective market forces, rather than scarcity. We only call them gems when we consider them valuable, while other incredibly rare rocks go ignored. Diamonds are only freakishly expensive because of global monopoly on diamond mines.
>>339658 >Fossil fuels are technically a renewable source, but they are being used faster than they are being replaced. The time it would take to "renew" oil through the natural process is a cycle longer than the entirety of human history, and for all we know it might just not happen again due to different geothermal circumstances. Even if oil could hypothetically be created again, it is by no means renewable.
>>339630 >Your beloved "electric cars" run on gas and oil burned in power plants. Hopefully if society gets its act together we could get the majority of our electricity through nuclear energy, which has potential to be dirt-cheap if the proper development/infrastructure/proliferation is put in place, a lot of those vehicles could be reliably powered by electricity. Too bad glowniggers keep fearmongering and driving people away from technology that has the potential to make electricity as cheap as air.
I hope this whole Russian energy controversy gets people to wake up and embrace energy independence through nuclear power.
The factory in the discovery magazine article ended up shutting down because niggers complained about the smell. It's likely the government hated it too.
>>339618 I consider it to be more reliable than dollars. It doesn't come close to gold, but at least it has the promise of scarcity, unlike paper money.
>>339665 >Gold can be produced from nuclear reactions and the price of gold could theoretically crash down some day If society gets to the point where nuclear energy is embraced and integrated to the point where nuclear technology is being used to easily manufacture rare materials, that is a future I'd gladly face economic instability for. If only the global industry invested more in nuclear power...
>>339659 >Diamonds are only freakishly expensive because of global monopoly on diamond mines. Not even a monopoly on diamond mines, it's artificial value bubble created by jew-eller conspiracy. Raw diamonds, that can't be cut, but can still be used in machinery (abrasives, diamond anvils, etc) are something like forty bucks to a bag. Of course, it doesn't help that you can manufacture diamonds to exact specification - said bubble is the only way diamonds are valuable at all. >There's a finite amount of it on earth. So is pretty much everything else, save for hydrogen (sun shoots it at us) and maybe iron and nickel (meteorites). Being finite isn't its main quality that led it to be used as currency. By the way, another reason is that gold can be native: its properties result in being able to find nuggets of pure gold, as opposed to various oxides and sulfates everything else comes as. >>339648 >plant-based fabrics They're called cotton and linen, genius. >plant-based plastics Technically you can make basic bitch polyethylene from plants easily, but anything actually useful like polyphenylene sulfide, ha ha no. >>339645 >replaced with alternatives Look up ammonia reactor. >>339655 Going by the spergouts, russian, made some exceptionally retarded financial decisions, and is now throwing a tantrum. >>339661 It still doesn't remove the issue of exceptionally toxic (like, you think burning gasoline is bad? try "spent lithium batteries dumped offshore poisoning the world's water supply".) components required FOR electric cars. The reasonable solution is to rape the automotive companies into dissolution, leave combustion-driven personal cars, but rebuild public transport (trams, subway, trains) to the point you don't NEED the cars anymore. >>339665 By the point you can waste nuclear on gold (and purify it enough so you don't need a NBC suit to handle it), you're already deep into fully automatic gay space communism and scarcity does not concern you. Hunting down gold asteroids is a far more likely prospect, as is having automatic spaceships mining Titan (it's MADE out of fucking hydrocarbons, if you can reach that, all your oil needs are solved for the next million years).
>>339670 >lithium batteries Yeah, battery technology is really going to need to improve if the world is to move away from fossil fuels. I want it in particular because I think it's an important step towards nuclear integration.
>>339673 Not to mention that lithium batteries are overall worse for the environment than fossil fuels, but the soy-brained normies just won't listen. Good luck ever getting nuclear mainstream in any of our lifetimes while women, power companies, and oil lobbies are terrified of it.
>>339659 Diamonds are the most common crystal in the world. For every whole quartz, there's roughly 4.5 pounds of diamond. For every pound of diamonds, 10-15% of them are "jewelry worthy", that is they have no flaws, and are clear or have good coloration. Artificial inflation on ultra difficulty.
>>339670 Old kike DeBeers started that shit in the Whoring Twenties with his "A diamond is forever" campaign aimed at huwymyn. This was after buying somewhere around a million tons of imported and thus ultra-cheap diamonds. His sons are still using that line today, and guess how rich they are.
Trains are insanely good at cost-per-multiton transportation. The ultra-efficient diesel engine design from 2008 can either pull 40% more cargo for the same fuel-per-mile as the 80's engines, save 40% more fuel, or do 20% of both. Fun fact: the designer is German.
>>339674 95% of the batteries’ components can be recycled. Plus, breakthroughs in battery technology could only make them better for the environment. Fossil fuel emissions are actively changing what the climate of the planet is like.
>>339670 >They're called cotton and linen, genius. I'm referring to when they tried to make clothing from soy beans and corn. > The reasonable solution is to rape the automotive companies into dissolution, leave combustion-driven personal cars, but rebuild public transport (trams, subway, trains) to the point you don't NEED the cars anymore. You mean like in Europe and Asia? Where the countries are so small and the governments so involved that such public transportation methods could be entirely embraced, but the populace still buy cars.
>>339659 >>339675 Aren't diamonds valuable because of their strength and cutting ability? Also, IIRC, they're becoming useful for the tech industry for storage.
>>339645 This is exactly the kind of post expected from low IQ niggers and lazy brainwashed NPCs. A deceptive statement which actually is not practical neither make economic sense.
>>339682 Industrial diamonds are made for such purposes, but they remain relatively low in value due to their commonality and the fact that they can’t exactly be made into gemstones. >>339684 This. People seem to be forgetting the main use of fossil fuels.
>>339679 >95% of the batteries’ components can be recycled. Right now, those components are being dumped in the Indonesia or thereabouts because it's cheaper to ship them to landfill there than to recycle. >Fossil fuel emissions are actively changing what the climate of the planet is like. >if the data doesn't match our predictions, the worse for the data The forest burning BLM did two years ago contributed more to the """climate change""" (mostly due to removal of forests) than fossil fuels ever will.
>>339681 >I'm referring to when they tried to make clothing from soy beans and corn. Lol what. No, seriously, what the fuck. Who is retarded enough to try making clothes out of food?
>>339687 >and the fact that they can’t exactly be made into gemstones Yes they can. Again, can be made to exact specification, including the impurities that make real gems distinctive and valuable.
>>339697 >pic 1 In the 1970’s, there were six times as many papers on global warming as there were on global cooling. > Right now, those components are being dumped in the Indonesia or thereabouts because it's cheaper to ship them to landfill there than to recycle. And world governments are beginning to take action against this measure by refusing to accept ships who send garbage. Recycling may one day be the only option. >Yes they can. Diamonds are the world’s hardest material. If it were that easy to make gemstones like that, then DeBiers would be out of business.
>>339698 Size matters. Easy to make an industrial diamond to do industrial work. Not so easy to make something to put in a niggers mouth so he can become a raper. One way of making gem-stones is to take a nuke, put in in a cave of relevant materials and then let it explode. With enough nukes in one place you could do the say above ground. I suggest Israel.
>>339698 >Diamonds are the world’s hardest material. If it were that easy to make gemstones like that, then DeBiers would be out of business. What part of "jew-eller monopony" you don't get, anon? They just claim that only "natural" diamonds have value, bam, done. And yes, it's that easy to manufacture diamonds - either replicate the natural conditions (HPHT, forms gemstones) or deposit carbon from gas until it organizes itself into diamond structure (CVD, forms literally any shape you want). >In the 1970’s, there were six times as many papers on global warming as there were on global cooling. And ten times as many predictions, spoken with absolute sureness (like from that one guy, Al Gore I think is the name, who still makes them and still isn't fired despite being an obvious scammer), that all failed to come true. Not to mention stuff like "we measured excessive CO2 in atmosphere! let's not mention the fact that the lab is on a slope of an active volcano" There is zero evidence that the climate upheaval is solely caused by humans and isn't a natural process that might or might not be influenced by it.
The worst producer of your precious "climate-affecting gases" is China, higher than the rest of the world combined. Somehow nobody is campaigning to "force China to go green" or impose sanctions because it's "bad for ecology". Know why? Besides the obvious dependency on China, that is.
It's because there's no fucking climate change, there's a conspiracy by manufacturers of various shit to force the public to buy their products - like how "the refrigerant gas we use is bad for ecology guise" always surfaces at exactly the same times patents for it come near expiration and has nonsensical studies "supporting it" like aforementioned CO2 excess, or the "ozone layer troubles" (ozone is the result of cosmic rays getting absorbed by O2 molecules, breaking them up in the process and causing them to recombine into O3; there's no ozone at the poles because higher radiation means they don't have a chance to recombine; "ozone layer protects us guize" is gibberish). The electric cars being shilled are similarly conspiracy by manufacturers of the cars themselves and components for them, because they l o s e to an electric train for inter-city transportation, to a tram and subway for inner-city transport, and to gasoline (in cold areas, diesel) for grid-independent transport. Incidentally there is likely a second conspiracy: you can't stockpile electricity the way you can stockpile liquid fuels, so electric cars render you much more dependent on globohomo-controlled infrastructure and unable to get away.
>>339701 It is already being done in the United States, but not with _nuclear_ explosions. https://youtu.be/_0UOB50Otok >>339702 >The worst producer of your precious "climate-affecting gases" is China, higher than the rest of the world combined. The problem there is that China has the world’s second-largest nominal GDP and the world’s largest GDP by PPP. They are one of the chief exporters of the world, so their emissions are in part due to the rest of the world choosing to do business with them despite their lack of alternative sources. Besides, the solar radiation that would start the global warming and be trapped by the CO2 does not care about which country it came from. >It's because there's no fucking climate change, there's a conspiracy by manufacturers of various shit to force the public to buy their products - like how "the refrigerant gas we use is bad for ecology guise" always surfaces at exactly the same times patents for it come near expiration and has nonsensical studies "supporting it" like aforementioned CO2 excess, or the "ozone layer troubles" (ozone is the result of cosmic rays getting absorbed by O2 molecules, breaking them up in the process and causing them to recombine into O3; there's no ozone at the poles because higher radiation means they don't have a chance to recombine; "ozone layer protects us guize" is gibberish). Mind you that the ozone layer is what allowed life to walk on land. Before then, the sun was a deadly lazer. >The electric cars being shilled are similarly conspiracy by manufacturers of the cars themselves and components for them, because they l o s e to an electric train for inter-city transportation, to a tram and subway for inner-city transport, and to gasoline (in cold areas, diesel) for grid-independent transport. The problem is that urban sprawl in the US is very far and wide and efforts to tighten it may still not offer enough congestion to necessitate a public transport system. Cars are a necessary evil and electric cars will likely be the way of the future, judging by the brief investor reaction to Volkswagen’s April Fool’s joke from last year.
>>339697 >Who is retarded enough to try making clothes out of food? Henry Ford was one such man.
>>339707 >Before then, the sun was a deadly lazer. During the time of the dinosaurs, the Earth was a fucking sauna, with CO2 levels five times above even our PEAK levels.
>>339724 >Who is retarded enough to try making clothes out of food? I dunno. Probably the same guys behind those darn edible panties. I fucking hate theis invention because the last thing you want to eat is a thin layer of sugary mass mixed with body sweat and an unpresedented undertones of human shit.
Wikipedia, in their attempt to protest the invasion of Ukraine, just changed the name of Russia to "North Eurasia" on their site, with all mentions of the name "Russia" on the page changed to "Ruthenia": https://archive.ph/BEN1S
>>339699 wheredoyouthinkyouare.jpg >>339707 >Besides, the solar radiation that would start the global warming and be trapped by the CO2 does not care about which country it came from. I agree, It does not care what scapegoat you jews are always laying the blame on, us or china. The people largely in control of this world should have to pay for the environmental damage with their filthy lives. get the hint?
>Russian ISDM "Agriculture" are firing in the Kharkiv region The Russian military first used the ISDM "Agriculture" during a special military operation in Ukraine. The video recording of the launch of isdM "Agriculture" shells in the Kharkiv region was published on March 26, 2022. https://www.bitchute.com/video/JoGsqf6VhCpA/
>>339751 >Yeah, therye making it go back to the way it was retard. “The way it was” involved lead-acid batteries that were even worse for the environment and only lasted for a few years. >>339754 >The people largely in control of this world should have to pay for the environmental damage with their filthy lives. This kind of rhetoric only leads to a slippery slope where freedom of speech is eroded little by little, as we have seen from the various dictatorships of the world.
>THE KADYROV BRIGADE SECURING MARIUPOL >Battles in Mariupol and a terrible view of the city from the air: special forces continue to mopp up Video of Ramzan Kada https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xsqpmkQQchc/
>>339918 >pic 4 The situations are different compared to that of Ukraine. In those cases, the countries being invaded by the US were the aggressors and nothing was being done to stop their advancements.
>>339935 And neither do Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, nor Libya. Someone had to put their aggression to an end and no one but the US was really prepared or right in doing so.
If the US is not to be the world’s policeman, what is the alternative? The UN is too bureaucratic to handle the responsibility, Russia and China seem as though they would only mess it up with their own bureaucracy and with authoritarianist policy, and having legally established spheres of influence would only lead to more wars and competitions over the boundaries of the spheres. Not everyone wants to be a cop, but no one wants to live in a world without cops.
>>339934 >countries being invaded by the US were the aggressors Are you even listening to yourself? Even the average warhawk boomer knows you're full of shit.
>>339937 >And neither do Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, nor Libya. Someone had to put their aggression to an end and no one but the US was really prepared or right in doing so. No, no one had to do shit. neo liberalist faggots like you are the reason it had to happen, up to ww1 countries could settle their differences like civilized Nations. No likes the Whore of isreal. The entire world hates this wicked nation, rightfully so. >If the US is not to be the world’s policeman, what is the alternative? The UN is too bureaucratic to handle the responsibility, Russia and China seem as though they would only mess it up with their own bureaucracy and with authoritarianist policy, and having legally established spheres of influence would only lead to more wars and competitions over the boundaries of the spheres. Not everyone wants to be a cop, but no one wants to live in a world without cops. What a brain dead take, Countries have the right to self determination without the most kike loving nation to ever exist destroying their entire nation with a terror bombing campaign, Russia has demonstrated how to wage a proper war, The Civilians and the Infrastructure are both intact for the most part. if the jewsa were in the place of Russia the entire country would be rubble and the Civilians dead and then retards like you would applaud and suck the kike in chief's dick
>>339943 >up to ww1 countries could settle their differences like civilized Nations Wage a war across the country, enslave the losers, and add the territory to your empire?
>>339942 >>339943 Please read the histories behind these events. If it were not for US intervention, Kuwait and Bosnia would not be nations, Libya would not have overthrown Gaddafi, and the Taliban would have had continuous rule in Afghanistan. >What a brain dead take, Countries have the right to self determination without the most kike loving nation to ever exist destroying their entire nation with a terror bombing campaign, Russia has demonstrated how to wage a proper war, The Civilians and the Infrastructure are both intact for the most part. So when it comes time to defend their rights to self-determination, what is to be done, especially if their military forces are too weak?
>>339948 >Please read the histories behind these events. If it were not for US intervention, Kuwait and Bosnia would not be nations, Libya would not have overthrown Gaddafi, and the Taliban would have had continuous rule in Afghanistan. and that's bad why? the jewsa should not be able to impose their will on More Legitimate Nations than itself.
>>339952 >But those governments have no right to do that eithe They Do >and an argument can be made that the US is more legitimate than all of those nations Nope, no argument can be made, because it is false.
>>339953 >They Do Then what gives any government the right or lack thereof to do so? >Nope, no argument can be made, because it is false. As modern nations, they all came into existence within the last 80 years or so. The USA as a nation has existed for 250 years or thereabouts.
>>339954 >Then what gives any government the right or lack thereof to do so? What i say does. >As modern nations, they all came into existence within the last 80 years or so. The USA as a nation has existed for 250 years or thereabouts. By Country you mean a puppet to world jewry
>>339965 >>339969 So will Russiapone eat her next now that she’s passed through Natopone’s bowels? Or am I just thinking this from having just watched the first two Hannibal Lecter movies?
>>339937 >Someone had to No. Nobody had to. That was a choice. A bad choice. >the US was really prepared Wtf, look at Libya now: it's a shithole. U.S. intervention just made it worse. We weren't "prepared"; we stormed in not knowing wtf we were doing and killed a bunch of tribal leaders, leaving cultural scars that they're still recovering from. >If the US is not to be the world’s policeman, what is the alternative? Do nothing. Let other countries defend themselves. >no one wants to live in a world without cops. You mean a world without United States imperialism where all those resources we spent interfering in foreign affairs were dedicated to improving quality of life in America? Count me in. >>339943 >up to ww1 countries could settle their differences like civilized Nations Ehhhh... Idk about that... >>339948 >Libya would not have overthrown Gaddafi It would be better. The aftermath of Gaddafi was a nightmare. >Taliban would have had continuous rule in Afghanistan. What difference would that have made in the long run? They had 20 years of fake prosperity and a corrupt kleptocracy for a puppet government, and not it all came crashing down anyway. >So when it comes time to defend their rights to self-determination, what is to be done Defend themselves. >too weak Get stronger. >those governments have no right to do that either… They were local residents, and therefore infinitly more legitimate than foreign USA imperialist invaders.
>>340007 >No. Nobody had to. That was a choice. A bad choice. So now suppose your country was in a similar situation and the dominant military force in the world refused to help. Without them, your country would collapse and you would be a target of the new leadership and would be shot on sight. How would you react then? >Do nothing. >Let other countries defend themselves. But what if they are incapable of doing so? They may lack the population or money required to fund a military force of the degree of strength necessary. They may lack the surface area required to evacuate their population to a secondary location in the event of an emergency. In an ideal world, every country would be capable of defending itself, but we do not live in an ideal world. >You mean a world without United States imperialism where all those resources we spent interfering in foreign affairs were dedicated to improving quality of life in America? Count me in. I mean a world without Russia imperialism where all those resources they spend interfering with foreign affairs are dedicated to killing people like you and me. >They had 20 years of fake prosperity and a corrupt kleptocracy for a puppet government, and not it all came crashing down anyway. But at least women were afforded an equal right to an education and many of the freedoms the people lost under the Taliban were still there. >They were local residents, and therefore infinitly more legitimate than foreign USA imperialist invaders. First, “local” residents may not necessarily be friendly neighbors as we have seen from Israel’s and Iraq’s cases. Second, while two nations may enjoy geographic proximity, they may not see each other as locals, since they may be culturally or ideologically distant. The population may not want the change of national sovereignty anyway and the “locals” may still treat them worse than they were previously being treated.
>>340011 >But what if they are incapable of doing so? They may lack the population or money required to fund a military force of the degree of strength necessary. They may lack the surface area required to evacuate their population to a secondary location in the event of an emergency. In an ideal world, every country would be capable of defending itself, but we do not live in an ideal world. The Japanese cannot make a military for any purpose due to the treaty they signed after their defeat in WWII. >while two nations may enjoy geographic proximity, they may not see each other as locals Like India and Pakistan? Or Israel and Palestine? Or Ukraine and Russia?
>>340032 >The Japanese cannot make a military for any purpose due to the treaty they signed after their defeat in WWII. And they are currently not the South Kamčatka Kraj or the East Jiangsu Province because the US has bases there. >Like India and Pakistan? Or Israel and Palestine? Or Ukraine and Russia? Exactly like them.
>>340043 >doorknobs Look at the door instead, it looks like a metal one, very rare in America. >I'm pretty sure that's American president on the mug A Benjamin from a dollar bill. Also the rocket looks like around 250mm caliber, it checks out with the kind of shit they are shooting each other.
>>340049 The fact that Ukraine is in a position of negotiating with Russia in the first place is a massive L for Russia. Their military blundered hard and they'll be living with this embarrassment for decades. And before you deny me as a NATO fanboy, it's quite the opposite. I'm frustrated that Russia fucked up so hard they've handed Western elites a golden get-out-of-jail-free card right when they needed one from COVID. Change my mind.
>>340056 They could have made sure not to put brawn over brain and actually tried to do what they could rather than try to scare people and hope it works.
>>340048 >door It's plastic/cheap wood. More than that, it's a closet door, so it being metal conflicts with how cheap everything else is. >Also the rocket looks like around 250mm caliber, it checks out with the kind of shit they are shooting each other. You misunderstood me. I'm not saying it's fake, I'm saying whoever built that shit kitchen deserves it for being a West-worshipping tard. >>340054 Remember, russian government is pro-vax and is doing the same shit to try and hide the massive list of vax injuries. It only dropped the mandates because absolutely nobody bothers following them. They're very much in on the COVID and distraction was intentional, and so was the meatgrinder. >>340059 >>340054 >Their military blundered hard and they'll be living with this embarrassment for decades. See above. But also, it's the generals and other high command being retarded and usual and failing to actually wage a war.
>>340056 They opened the war with inexperienced, unprepared troops. Spread them too thin across too many fronts. Rushed too far forward without proper logistical support. It seems like they were expecting Ukraine to swiftly surrender without a real fight at the first sight of Russian tanks. Maybe they expected the Ukrainian leadership to be cowardly and flee the country, leaving it headless and easy to capture. In reality, the Ukrainian leadership did not surrender, they called Russia's bluff. Even then, the Russians could have crushed them conventionally, but because they were spread so thin their troops failed to achieve any meaningful strategic objectives in a timely manner. And every lost tank, every stalled front, became propaganda fodder for Ukraine to boost morale and rally support. Now the Russians are bogged down in a painful and costly slugfest, with seemingly no strategic compensation to show for it. Now they're trying to settle for some kind of treaty to keep Ukraine out of NATO or demilitarize, which is a pathetic consolation prize compared to the real goal of annexing the country outright. And then there's the international sanctions. From what I've read, they started the war while they still had significant value invested in foreign assets, which of course was all seized during the opening sanctions. Something on the order of 200-300 billion USD worth of money taken by western governments without needing to lift a finger. That alone makes this entire venture obscenely costly, and it was largely avoidable if they'd made efforts to move that money before initiating the conflict. I'm not saying it's easy to shift all those assets but goddamn, it's 200 billion dollars, they could have tried. The entire affair just reeks of being poorly planned and executed. And I don't know, I'm just some random person on the Internet, maybe Putin knows something that I don't. Maybe he had good intel that NATO was gonna pull some bullshit and this was the only way to interrupt it. Or maybe the schizo-posters are right and Putin is purposefully throwing his country under the bus to help usher in the next stage of the NWO plan. I normally scoff at shit like that but in this case it's kinda hard to deny such a theory. I'm still inclined to believe they just made a genuine monumental fuckup. Their generals underestimated the opposition, gambled, and lost. Tough game.
>>340061 >Their generals underestimated the opposition, gambled, and lost. Tough game. A "little victory-bringing war" as this kind of situation is known in Russia. Yes, politicians keep doing this. Repeatedly. Launching a war to distract people from something, expecting easy victory, and getting trounced. >Now they're trying to settle for some kind of treaty to keep Ukraine out of NATO or demilitarize, which is a pathetic consolation prize compared to the real goal of annexing the country outright. Annexing it outright? After eight years of propaganda aimed at creating russophobia and instilling USA's niggertroon values? Are you retarded? That would waste SO MANY RESOURCES. >Maybe he had good intel that NATO was gonna pull some bullshit and this was the only way to interrupt it. Whether the schizobomb for the Crimean bridge, or the biolabs (by the way, have those been destroyed yet?), it's possible. Speaking about biolabs, annexing Ukraine would be a bad idea because of them too. Nothing stops USA from creating delayed-release pathogens, and if you annex, it's your citizens (whether natives or brought in) who will be fucked up, and moreso, because guerillas don't stay in cities, it's the productive sheeple who would be hit.
>>340007 stop responding to this retarded fapper >>no one wants to live in a world without cops. >you mean a world without US imperialism lmao no, He's just straight up wrong. Cops should not exist. nor should the justice system.
>>340011 >So now suppose your country was in a similar situation and the dominant military force in the world refused to help. Without them, your country would collapse and you would be a target of the new leadership and would be shot on sight. How would you react then? Violence. >but muh dominant military force Asymmetrical violence.
>>340054 >durrr shut up glowie. No one asked for the opinions of people who are too dumb to understand both sides are part of the WEF and this is all a show.
>>340054 >>340061 I would like you take a look to the following, then make an introspection of yourself. Will you acknowledge that those thoughts are not actually yours but were imprinted in your brain through the zog TV?
>Russia Mythology Dominates the U.S. Media >My brother-in-law sent me the following CNBC piece of “journalism” which paints a dire picture of Russia’s “failure” in Ukraine. >It is laughably devoid of facts, but hey, that is what passes for journalism anymore in the West. I am old enough to remember the good old days (i.e., Soviet Pravda) when we Americans could chortle heartily at the spin coming out of Moscow. Well, I have now lived to see almost the entire establishment media outdoing Pravda in terms of flat-out lying to its audience. >The CNBC piece insists that “Moscow is facing unintended consequences of its aggression in Ukraine, ranging from high casualties among its troops to economic ruin for years to come.” Before delving into the 5 CNBC points, I want to comment on the talking point that Putin expected a “quick victory” and that the failure to conquer Ukraine in four weeks is a disaster for him. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/russia-mythology-dominates-u-s-media/
>NYT: U.S. Intel Claiming Putin 'Misinformed' on War is Part of 'Information Warfare' Campaign >The top story the controlled media pushed on Wednesday was part of a Biden administration "information warfare" campaign aimed at disrupting Russia's invasion of Ukraine, according to the New York Times. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62990
>>340074 >being this much of an obvious glow Your shitty WEF sat on their disavvowment for almost 2 weeks waiting for sanctions to force them to. Eat my ass glownigger
>>340073 If Russia were on track towards a strategic military victory, why are they in talks with Ukraine that don't involve demands of surrender? Clearly if they thought they were going to win, they'd be making more serious demands. Also, I don't care how self-sufficient they supposedly are, you don't lose 200+ billion USD of assets and just shrug that off. That stings.
>>340077 >Clearly if they thought they were going to win Russia already won nigger. Ukraine military is broken, most of their depots and facilities are in flames, they have 70K soldiers in a cauldron in the east and the rest in the west are unable to mount even an attempt of a counter attack. The plan was always to fuck the military over and regime change, then to leave as soon as possible because Moscow doesn't want to invest a single ruble in feeding hungry Ukrainians. >Also, I don't care how self-sufficient they supposedly are, you don't lose 200+ billion USD of assets and just shrug that off. That stings. If you already has heard of the petro-dollar and how was the key ingredient for America's bonanza, then make room for the petro-ruble because the Russian economy is about to enter in the most wealthy time in history, no kidding. Brought to all of us by the jews and their operatives in the WEF, FED, and White House. Yup, America next stop is chaos and disintegration.
>>340069 >Asymmetrical violence. So you would basically be the ant who defies a boot? >>340078 >If you already has heard of the petro-dollar and how was the key ingredient for America's bonanza, then make room for the petro-ruble because the Russian economy is about to enter in the most wealthy time in history, no kidding. Don’t forget that rubles cannot be converted outside of Russia.
>>340081 >Don’t forget that rubles cannot be converted outside of Russia. From April 1, 2022; they will. Otherwise the European economy, industry and domestic heating will come to a sudden halt.
>>340082 Even if what you say is true (and I doubt it is, nice try on the April Fool’s joke, by the way), the Wall Street Journal seems to agree with me in saying that this may not necessarily dethrone the dollar’s dominance, even if it does put a dent in it. Many of the world’s payments are already contracted in US dollars and US treasury bills set the world standard for risk-free investment. Having to switch currencies would only break said contracts and force a switch from the most widely banked foreign currency.
>>340084 >(((the Wall Street Journal))) >Even if what you say is true (and I doubt it is, nice try on the April Fool’s joke, by the way) See >>340083 → And lurk moar.
>>340086 >By Tyler Durden So you expect me to believe an article written by Edward Norton’s hallucinations? >activistpost So you expect me to believe an article published by a news outlet that has more to do with conspiracy theories than proper news reporting?
>>340084 >Having to switch currencies would only break said contracts and force a switch from the most widely banked foreign currency. By seizing Russian money, America entered in default. The breach of contract wasn't initiated by the Russians. So, if Russian cannot use the until now world currency, then the dollar has became irrelevant and gold, bitcoins and rubles come to replace it. Realize that the demise of the dollar and utter ruin of the western economy is scripted and according to the roadmap of UN's Agenda 2030. What you NPCs don't grasp yet is that a world without fossil fuels means a world without civilization. You are getting what you support. Niggers.
>>340090 >By seizing Russian money, America entered in default. The breach of contract wasn't initiated by the Russians. And why would you not try to prevent those who were trying to kill you from spending money in your country? >So, if Russian cannot use the until now world currency, then the dollar has became irrelevant and gold, bitcoins and rubles come to replace it. Again, there are no ruble reserves anywhere in the world outside of Russia and it is not like people would be freely able to spend them even if there were. There are still standing agreements for payment of gas in dollars and euros, so it is not like this will change anything, since the purchasers are still bound by those agreements. Even if what you say is completely true, the ruble would likely either skyrocket in price or be produced in higher quantities. This would either cause deflation or inflation because either it would make little sense to invest when cash has that much value or the ruble would become diluted and the prices of goods would need to increase to reflect that. >What you NPCs don't grasp yet is that a world without fossil fuels means a world without civilization. Fossil fuels will likely not be completely replaced immediately, but some alternative will need to be found soon, especially if this conflict rages on. >>340091 It is closer to “gold backed by rubles”, since there is now an official selling price for gold bullion.
>>340092 >but some alternative will need to be found soon The ONLY alternatives to oil, that are actually viable, are nuclear and geothermal energy. Maybe, hydroelectricity and gas. Everything else is either highly inefficient for what energy it does produce (Solar, wind), or doesn't provide enough to compensate for today's metropolises (Coal).
>>340107 >lightning or rain As a Gulf city in the South, they have probably taken care of both circumstances, especially if large batteries can be used to store power when the equipment is not in use. >Putin Now that I can believe, but all forms of power would be just as vulnerable. The bigger concern is whether all of the computers at all of the power stations are up-to-date on threat protection and how difficult it is in the end to get malware onto one of them.
>>340078 i feel like we wouldn't be able to buy rubles. I was considering doing so but maybe russia wouldnt' even honor purchases of their monopoly money if they roll out a nu currency.
>>340110 >Those mythical batteries do not exist True. >will never exist Let's not jump to conclusions. There's no reason to assume that battery technology has reached it's limit. We could always improve.
>>340116 That is probably a feat in and of itself… and would require the sheer numbers to do so. >>340120 Please see >>340111. They do exist and are in use.
>>340111 What "green energy" shills always neglect to mention is that the massive batteries required to make wind/solar viable are so fucking toxic to produce that they completely offset the lifetime emission savings of those power systems. It's not easy or economical to recycle most batteries, and the more advanced options tend to also be more toxic. Yet another reason why nuclear is superior, it's truly emission neutral without the need for huge battery farms.
>>340139 No, the conversion rate for RU->USD. I get what you're saying, but it's important to distinct value and USD conversion rates. I'll be excited if it goes past 1.
>>340061 Okay so Russia executes its textbook strategy in the opening of the war, almost word for word perfectly, establishing forward positions for operational bases and logistical trains, and then some retard drops this truth bomb that, <hurr durr they overextended without logistical support That's without using their twenty times larger local air to just flatten every enemy target as well. Awesome, whatever retard. Filtered by ID. /mlpol/ is nowadays the only place I can't just filter Americans by flag because that's most of the site. (I would rangeban them).
Seriously. Blows my fucking mind how some of you retards don't know anything and think your meditations are absolute spirit bombs and that you're the smartest people on the planet, with the best comments. Unironically open a book dipshit. Syria wasn't that long ago and documents on Russian strategy aren't top secret esoteric. Meditating on shit in your head stops having value after awhile, memeflag.
>>340141 There's whole generations that seen the exact same tactics as well. Which is why when every talking head personality is shocked the incredulity grows.
>>340161 >second pic. Russia's actions are inherently imperialistic and no amount of poltard mental gymnastics are going to change that fact. You can hate 'murica even more than Russia, hell! You can support the drunktard Khanate all you want. But you are gonna have to live with the fact that reality is not a fucking Disney movie.
>>340169 I just realised that I could've hidden my flag, and with this new ID; the average 4/pol/ tourist would run out of nigger-tier posts in no time
>>340170 You are not alone. Russian and Chinese operatives are allegedly performing operations on US soil as well and my hometown is seeing an increase in police activity. I acknowledge that there are typically DUI checkpoints on highways late at night when I get dinner sometimes, but there are simply more of them now and there seem to be more officers who are roving on my street than typical. I don’t want a dystopian police state like “1984” depicts or one where the residents of my community are heavily harassed and profiled, but I also don’t want the KGB or the CCP doing anything like that either, especially when they are outside of their own home soil.
>>340305 I stopped reading at point 5. That faggot has no idea what he is talking about.
>2019 >Putin Opens Europe's Longest Bridge Linking Russia and Annexed Crimea >Russian President Vladimir Putin has opened a contentious bridge linking Russia to the annexed region of Crimea. President Putin travelled on an inaugural train journey across the 19-kilometre bridge, which now takes the title as the longest bridge in Europe. >Mr Putin enjoyed tea with engineers on board the train before congratulating workers for proving that Russia is capable of carrying out large-scale infrastructure projects. >The $3.6 billion project has been condemned by Ukraine, the United States and the EU following the annexation of Crimea in 2014, with the new link said to violate the sovereignty of Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3XSHXXoD6o
>>340330 >That's not related to America' security, but Chinese. If China is hunting down Americans on American soil, then it absolutely is related to American national security. >honeypots It is the DOJ, not some porno site. If you want to visit a honeypot, maybe some Veronika or Aryanne pics would be in order.
>>340340 Are you sure about that? Even if they are exclusively hunting down Chinese nationals who have no US citizenship on US soil, there is the potential for a case of mistaken identity and their mere presence on US soil without authorization is likely a war crime.
And aren’t you forgetting the old saying? You can move to America and become an American, but you can’t move to China and become a Chinaman.
>>340343 > Even if they are exclusively hunting down Chinese nationals who have no US citizenship on US soil, there is the potential for a case of mistaken identity >Oh Rook Zhon Thatu Manu is Whiteu, Is He Chinamanu? >you can move to America and become an American, but you can’t move to China and become a Chinaman. No One says that. and only Whites can be american. > US soil without authorization is likely a war crime. You act like the jewsa has never committed a warcrime
>>340348 >only Whites can be american. Then who is white? >You act like the jewsa has never committed a warcrime And? All nations have dark spots in their histories, so the past is somewhat irrelevant. Is the USA invading Russia or China and killing their citizens on their soil? Better yet, are they spying on American defectors in those countries and those who associate with them? Do they have paid trolls and bots to spy on and spam messages on Classmates and Youku pages? >>340349 If they were spying on you or your family and you saw a loved one assassinated at their hands, then just who is being dishonest and hypocritical?
>>340350 >Then who is white? Miss me with that Sargon tier argument, it's obvious who is white. > Is the USA invading Russia or China and killing their citizens on their soil? Better yet, are they spying on American defectors in those countries and those who associate with them? Do they have paid trolls and bots to spy on and spam messages on Classmates and Youku pages? Without a Doubt, Yes >Oh My God Name One Example! Snowden
>>340351 >Miss me with that Sargon tier argument, it's obvious who is white. No, it isn’t. A Mississippi man named Davis Knight and his wife thought that he was white, but evidence came up that he was partially African-American and so did not qualify as white under Mississippi’s segregation laws. >Without a Doubt, Yes Then how come we have not seen users of these platforms, such as Agrol, comment about this? There are some YouTube comments about an idea for something like this, but how come there have so far been no complaints about that, but far more complaints about Russian and Chinese bots? >Snowden Is he really being spied on by the US government, though? I’m pretty sure that the government of Russia would have engaged in a conflict much earlier if this were true.
>>340352 >it's obvious who is white. >No, it isn’t >Some random faggot in Mississippi can't tell who's White >So no one can tell who's white Very Retarded logic, Sargonite >Then how come we have not seen users of these platforms, such as Agrol, comment about this? There are some YouTube comments about an idea for something like this, but how come there have so far been no complaints about that, but far more complaints about Russian and Chinese bots? >Why would the State back video platform (((Youtube))) not like amerimutt bots Oh boy thats certainly a headscratcher >Is he really being spied on by the US government, though? Yes he is.
>>340351 >>340356 How is this for a thought? Even if Edward Snowden is being spied on by the US government, how bad is the situation from the other side? The wrongness of spying does not cancel itself out from one act alone, but one must look at how evil each side is.
Russia and China are spying on Americans in America in order to capture dissidents and defectors in order to save face for their own causes and further the cause of authoritarianism. The US government would be spying on ONE GUY in order to make sure no national security secrets leak. He would not really be that much of a defector anyway, since his cause does not necessarily exist in Russia. Simply put, in America, we browse websites. In Russia, websites browse us.
So yes. Even if Edward Snowden were being spied on, that is nothing compared to the spying done by the Russian and Chinese operatives on US soil. Snowden’s messages for the American people were the product of an era where privacy was less of a concern and HTTPS encryption was not as widespread. I wouldn’t appreciate the US spying on him either, but Russian and Chinese spying on Americans is far, far worse.
>>340365 >>340364 The jewsa spys on literally everyone who uses the internet on the planet >What is the NSA >What is mass surveillance >What is the prism program Cope Harder you disinfo Fag. drink bleach and writhe in agony as your stomach and intestines Dissolve.
>>340366 And? That does not Russia’s and China’s activities any less wrong. I would much rather be spied on by an agency that was not trying to kill me than an agency that was trying to kill me. The extent that Russian and Chinese spying is also far worse if they have more operatives on US soil who are out to perform far worse.
Either way, we need to worry about our packet encryption and limit the amount of third-party analytics cookies we allow, especially if tools such as Sklearn make first-party analytics easy. We are being spied on one way or another, but we will need to accept the lesser of two evils before we can make any grand reforms.
>>340367 >I would much rather be spied on by an agency that was not trying to kill me Kek you actually think they want you alive? Retard moment. Are you a Chinese or Russian national?
>>340368 No, but the point still stands. Their unauthorized presence is an inherent national security threat because they could easily mistake someone’s identity and it is a slippery slope to spying on American nationals. >>340369 Are you using the Internet right now? Chances are Google Analytics and Facebook have already collected some degree of data about you. They are not trying to kill you, but an Austrian website once got in trouble for sending too much information to Google. You don’t have to be logged in or even have an account.
>>340370 >No, but the point still stands. Their unauthorized presence is an inherent national security threat because they could easily mistake someone’s identity and it is a slippery slope to spying on American nationals. And you don't think the nsa isn't a threat to national security? Why don't you turn off your vpn and show your real flag by the way? >>340370 >Are you using the Internet right now? Chances are Google Analytics and Facebook have already collected some degree of data about you. They are not trying to kill you, but an Austrian website once got in trouble for sending too much information to Google. You don’t have to be logged in or even have an account. Less coping, more bleach drinking.
>>340371 >And you don't think the nsa isn't a threat to national security? Their current activities arguably are, but those taken by China and Russia are far worse threats that need to be curbed. If the NSA’s activities were a small brush fire, those taken by Russia and China would be the wildfires of California. Which one would you want extinguished first and foremost?
>>340379 Yea Mexi-bro your English is very Good. maybe you could get a job there. Just don't Heil Hitler during the job interview and you should be ok.
>>340426 Man, the German alphabet looks like a Swiss cheese.
>H banned because it stands for Heil Hitler >N banned because it stands for National Socialism >S banned because it stands for Schutzstaffel >Z banned because it stands for Putin
Soon, Germanistanis will have to resort to sign language to avoid any doubleplusungood letters.
>>340432 I’m no lawyer, but it seems as though there are a combination of factors that would need to be involved in order for one letter alone to seal your fate. The German language uses the QWERTZ keyboard for a reason.
>>340436 Anon, Germany is so retarded with their laws, that vidya have been banned there unless they replace all the NPCs with robots. Hell, here's a soft list of all the games currently banned in the country: https://archive.ph/PsdwZ#Germany
>>340365 >The wrongness of spying does not cancel itself out from one act alone, but one must look at how evil each side is. They are both evil. >The US government would be spying on ONE GUY They are spying on all of us. Every single person in the U.S. who has ever spoken on the phone or used the internet. They're probably spying on us right now.
>>340367 >That does not Russia’s and China’s activities any less wrong. Of course it doesn't. >I would much rather How about neither? >we will need to accept the lesser of two evils No. Fuck that bullshit. I refuse.
>>340370 >Their unauthorized presence is an inherent national security threat because they could easily mistake someone’s identity and it is a slippery slope to spying on American nationals. That is exactly what I've been saying about the NSA.
>>340398 Probably because the Mexican government doesn't care enough about harboring wanted Chinese nationals to mess up its relationship with China. It could also be because Chinese criminals may be suppliers for drug cartels.
>>340372 >Which one would you want extinguished first and foremost? The NSA, because it directly affects me, it's unconstitutional, and as an American citizen I have an obligation to oppose it because that's how things are supposed to work.
>>340436 >>340439 Like all despotic laws, it's probably written intentionally vaguely, so that the parameters are unclear and law enforcement / prosecutors have enormous discretion to enforce it on disidents who circumstantially break it.
>>340453 >They are both evil. That still does not properly explain who is in the greater wrong and thus who is of greater concern. At this point, the US government is like Chris Rock and the Russian government is like Will Smith slapping him. Both were in the wrong, but Mr. Smith committed a worse evil that was not called for. >No. Fuck that bullshit. I refuse. I am against NSA spying as much as you are, but it still does not justify the actions taken by the KGB, which are objectively worse. One of them simply denies you entry at a border crossing, the other one goes out of its way to try to kill you on your own home soil. >>340456 >That is exactly what I've been saying about the NSA. But at least the NSA is not on American soil under false pretenses. >>340458 Again, it is possible to be against both forms of spying, but Russian and Chinese spying are the bigger threat, since they are violating American national sovereignty to achieve their goals. Please see pic related for an example of the logic that is being used.
>>340461 The US government is a bunch of child trafficking jews that get caught using child prostitutes to blackmail people into supporting israel, kill a guy in federal prison to cover it, run torture operations on it's own citisens, runs ops like 9/11 or northwoods to do it, entire wars fought on fake pretenses, Iraq alone with 100,000 civilian deaths. That's the teeniest tiniest fraction of it's explicit crimes. Almost every single problem in the west is beamed directly from some US kike, all this fucking leftist garbage, all these social problems, all these invaders in Europe from the US making wars. There is no greater evil in the world
>>340464 The Russian government is a bunch of child trafficking commies that get caught trying to assassinate innocent Americans and Brits in order to suppress their bad reputation abroad, blow up their own cars in order to cover it, run torture operations on its own citizens, run ops like Inspector Clouseau, entire wars fought on fake pretenses, Afghanistan alone with up to 2M civilian deaths. That is the tiniest fraction of its explicit crimes.
>>340464 The way you phrase that only exposes your agenda to make the US look bad and exposes potential distortions and alterations of facts and evidence.
>>340461 >who is in the greater wrong Irrelevant. I reject your false dichotomies. Two things can be terrible at once; marginal differences don't matter. >Chris Rock >Will Smith Video fucking related. >it still does not justify the actions taken by the KGB I never said it did. >the NSA is not on American soil under false pretenses. Idk, I'd call unconstitutional mass surveillance a false pretenses. Why does "pretense" even matter? I don't care about jurisdiction, just what they're doing. >it is possible to be against both forms of spying Yes. >Russian and Chinese spying are the bigger threat Debatable, but sure. I still despise both and support neither.
>>340476 I don't want to pretend like Russia doesn't have it's own kikes, but you basically just made stuff up (or at least I want you to make a better case for it), mention one by one cases (random journos being killed isn't a normal person problem), and a war involving the Sovet Union, not Russia
Sidenotes, you really need to update firmware if Russia is commie in your head and I love that whenever anyone in any country ever does anything libshitty it's always (here just largely) in English, exactly because everyone gets it from the US. "Не верьте пропаганда", lol
>>340478 Clearly we can only listen to people who think the US is good on points on why it's bad. Say something if you're going to respond
>>340485 >Two things can be terrible at once Literally unrelated non-point. He knows. Admit one can be terriblerer. You can argue about whether it's marginal enough or not
>>340485 You: >Irrelevant. I reject your false dichotomies. Two things can be terrible at once; marginal differences don't matter. Also you: >>They were only claiming to do right by their ethnic descendants, but this sort of imperialism is rather pointless, especially if their ethnicities formed vast minorities in the regions they conquered if they were not absent entirely. >I feel the same way about Israel. >Which is why I drew the distinction. Also also you: >>Israel is a different story, though. >Rules for the but not for me. Typically Jews You know the drill.
>>340485 >Irrelevant. I reject your false dichotomies. Two things can be terrible at once; marginal differences don't matter. So if you were robbing someone else’s house at gunpoint and the owner’s response was to threaten to detonate a nuclear warhead that would level the entire city, then would “both are evil” still apply? >Idk, I'd call unconstitutional mass surveillance a false pretenses. They are at least on US soil legally. The alternative would be to deport them, but there is no other country to deport many of them to. >>340495 >I don't want to pretend like Russia doesn't have it's own kikes, but you basically just made stuff up (or at least I want you to make a better case for it) These assassination attempts have been going on since God-knows-when. We know that there has been an assassination attempt in 2018 of a British national and that they foolishly did it in their uniforms. Now they are on US soil and we don’t know whom they are after now. >mention one by one cases (random journos being killed isn't a normal person problem) It is still a slippery slope that leaves the Russian government open to moving the goalposts like in 1984. Plus, it is unlikely that all of the political prisoners they have are journalists. It is more likely that some of them are guilty of peacefully protesting against the government. >and a war involving the Sovet Union, not Russia >Sidenotes, you really need to update firmware if Russia is commie in your head and I love that whenever anyone in any country ever does anything libshitty it's always (here just largely) in English, exactly because everyone gets it from the US. "Не верьте пропаганда", lol Many of the government officers and officials have remained the same. If they truly wanted to make themselves different and restart the entire country, they should try people like Germany did after WWII or like France did following its revolution. >Clearly we can only listen to people who think the US is good on points on why it's bad. Say something if you're going to respond The post was clearly agenda-filled thanks to its blatant racism and hate-filled remarks. It was clearly intended to be an attempt at undoing the nation our forefathers had founded as Lincoln described in his Gettysburg Address.
>>340499 I saw your first post with the "First, they came for the industry titans", then you replace that with an equally libtarted slippery slope meme. Kike shit after kike shit
>blatant racism and hate-filled remarks
Why are you here? You don't belong here.
>our forefathers "Our progeny", "free White men", "these nigger slaves aren't human". They were racist, dumb nigger kike
>>340500 >They were racist, dumb nigger kike No offense, but did you miss this bit? >as Lincoln described in his Gettysburg Address. I seem to recall part of it saying this: >our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Notice how the post said as Lincoln described them, not necessarily how modern historians sometimes describe them.
>>340500 >pic related I wonder how the Nazis would handle Pinkie Pie in their camps after they find out her cartoonish nature. They had ambitious efforts into experimenting on and studying people, so what if they had captured Pinkie Pie, but they spent too long trying to figure out how she works that the Allies came and overran them before they could get anywhere? >Why are you here? You don't belong here. If this is a political discussion board, then I do not see how everyone belongs here, or at least everyone who supports the idea of freedom of speech and peaceably assemble.
>>340478 You make the US have worse foreign and domestic relations. The founding fathers of this county would disown you. If you grew as a person that would be in service for the country. But no. You'll just keep sucking and swallowing, trying to blow smoke up people's asses and be a shifty shity yellow bellied bastard. You won't actually speak freely. Nor would you disagree with the multitude of foreign saboteurs. You could have been a bit more, yet there you are as you are. Trying to drag everybody into your obsessions while actively disregarding everything else. I mean you could have at least tried using the learning material available to the general public let alone whatever private crap. >>340504 >freedom of speech and peaceably assemble. Your past actions are the counter point to those values. Yet another reason why you don't belong here. >Pinkie Pie They would have thrown a party for first contact. And the world would be a better place. That's only just with a pony existing. That's the base line. The minimum. >>340499 >After the rape and burning of Germany. Do you even history? >clearly intended to be an attempt at undoing the nation our forefathers had founded Do you actually understand the references you are trying to make or are you just including them because of the quick summary you think they mean. >Russian and Chinese spying are the bigger threat, since they are violating American national sovereignty to achieve their goals. Oh but if anyone says "Israeli spying and influence is the bigger threat, since they are violating American national sovereignty to achieve their goals." You'll be jumping around saying >What about if everyone is a jew? What if rubbing hands togther means peace with others? Is it really violating national sovereignty? Besides the fucking point you're continually off topic and actively derail the freedom of speech that is taking place. >>340367 >I'd rather a sip of safety than having freedom. >>340372 If Russia and China are California fires then jewish activists are the arsonists starting and perpetuating those California fires.
>>340512 >You won't actually speak freely. Nor would you disagree with the multitude of foreign saboteurs. If I agreed with the multitude of foreign saboteurs, I’d probably be dead. >Do you actually understand the references you are trying to make or are you just including them because of the quick summary you think they mean. Please see >>340503. >Israeli spying That point would need some very, very serious backing from neutral sources who can prove their lacks of biases well and those of all sources in their chains. Why? Because the antisemitic cause is embraced by the vast majority of people on the planet and few people are willing to live with Jews as next door neighbors. >Besides the fucking point you're continually off topic and actively derail the freedom of speech that is taking place. This discussion of antisemitism is detailing the thread. I don’t even see how this could be a thread for free political discussion if the only thing you’re allowed to say is “hur durr muh jooz did that”. >>I'd rather a sip of safety than having freedom. Please read the post again. Russian and Chinese spies are trying to find people who are exercising their freedoms and punish them. We cannot assume we still live in a free society when we can be punished for exercising our freedoms, especially when said punishment is dealt out by an adversarial government.
>>340514 >Because the antisemitic cause is embraced by the vast majority of people on the planet and few people are willing to live with Jews as next door neighbors. No joke? >We cannot assume we still live in a free society when we can be punished for exercising our freedoms, especially when said punishment is dealt out by an adversarial government. That's true. >spies are trying to find people who are exercising their freedoms and punish them. The scope is larger. In addition it's not just any freedoms, it's specific uses of the inalienable rights and also the perceived uses. >If I agreed with the multitude of foreign saboteurs, I’d probably be dead. You're still useful for them, they wouldn't do it on purpose just yet.
>>340499 >So if you were robbing someone else’s house at gunpoint and the owner’s response was to threaten to detonate a nuclear warhead Based. >The alternative would be to deport them, but there is no other country to deport many of them to. Deport them into the sea. >>340504 >Pinkie Alternate universe where there's a Pinkie clone crisis in Germany, but Nazis are unable to dispose of all 6 gorillion with their limited amount of ovens.
>>340530 >Deport them into the sea. That is not an option. They would need to be deported to some country and they could easily produce citizenship documentation for the United States. >Alternate universe where there's a Pinkie clone crisis in Germany, but Nazis are unable to dispose of all 6 gorillion with their limited amount of ovens. Maybe their ovens would have been too busy baking her rum cakes or Neapolitan pizzas, then. Though I don’t know how I would react if I were a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp and a pink bubblegum horse who kept hugging me insisted she was going to be the one to save my life.
>>340514 >Because the antisemitic cause is embraced by the vast majority of people on the planet and few people are willing to live with Jews as next door neighbors. I wish. This past century it hasn't been so great, at least not in western civilization.
>>340532 You sound somewhat contradictory. I agree that antisemitism is on the rise and that has made the last century not so great, but why do you say “I wish”?
>>340535 If the majority of everyone on the world has such a hate boner for Jews why are they still around? How exactly has your definition of antisemitism made everything else worse off? What is your definition of antisemitism?
>>340499 >they are on US soil legally no, the intelligence organizations in the government are openly violating the Constitution, and therefore they do not exist legally. They are a mafia with a stranglehold on the country, and allowed to do so by complicit politicians.
>muh assassination attempts picrel
yes i dont want russian spies operating in the US. I don't want chinese spies doing so either. Nor israeli spies (one of the most significant operators here). And I certainly despise the 5 eyes and how we all subvert each others' democratic processes by spying on each other, then trading the information, bypassing the laws against spying on our citizens ourselves. Aboslutely malicious. our governments in the west will never give up this power and control until we force them to. And they have used it to silence dissidents in the west already, and to kill our citizens. KGB is a threat that can be opposed if we have a healthy unity and solid base of rights and freedoms, which is what the modern west was founded on. However, we are allowing all of our rights and liberties to be not only eroded, but stripped away entirely. How can we be unified against other civilizations if we are betraying our foundational values?
Countries like the UK and Australia are now conducting more political arrests than even russia, and they're doing it over innocent things like posting rap lyrics to social media, or singing "everybody loves kung fu fighting" to entertain tourists. It's pretty abhorrent. How can you come to me and post about foreign operations being so evil, when you're seemingly blind to the horrors we're committing on our own citizens right now, openly and "legally"? Please, it's very insulting and it's why everyone hates your posts.
We are supposed to be the Free World. We are supposed to be champions of liberty and citizens' rights and authority to choose and change their governments. All we have to do is live up to this, and no amount of foreing interloping could shake our unity.
The largest obstacle to this is the centralization of our entire media, social media, education, film industry, banking industry, etc. All owned by a tiny group of individuals with a common background, who have been working very tirelessly to tear down everything we are founded on.
>>340536 Because all humans are Jewish. Who else but Eve could have been the first mother to pass Judaism along to her offspring? >>340538 >If the majority of everyone on the world has such a hate boner for Jews why are they still around? Because there was a global effort to kill them all and/or segregate against them, but they have proven themselves to be too resilient in dealing with what society throws at them. Humanity has mostly learned from its mistakes and antisemitism has gotten better, but it still only means that people generally don’t think that Jews should be segregated against or killed. Instead, they hold grudges against Jews and hold them to different standards than the rest of society. >>340541 >no, the intelligence organizations in the government are openly violating the Constitution, and therefore they do not exist legally. >They are a mafia with a stranglehold on the country, and allowed to do so by complicit politicians. That is completely off-topic. Many of their agents are still US citizens and are therefore on American soil legally. The agencies themselves may need to be reformed, but the agents themselves are legally on US soil. >Countries like the UK and Australia are now conducting more political arrests than even russia, and they're doing it over innocent things like posting rap lyrics to social media, or singing "everybody loves kung fu fighting" to entertain tourists. It's pretty abhorrent. How can you come to me and post about foreign operations being so evil, when you're seemingly blind to the horrors we're committing on our own citizens right now, openly and "legally"? Please, it's very insulting and it's why everyone hates your posts. At least they are transparent about it in those cases. Russia may very well have more political prisoners than they do and they may not be telling the world about them in their metrics in order to avoid gaining a bad reputation. Plus, the laws in Russia are stricter on these matters. If Russia started doing that and you posted about it in a critical manner as you did, then it’d be off to the gulag with you, comrade. While countries like the ones you mentioned may not be the best at free speech, they certainly are very liberal in how much they allow you to criticize their actions.
>>340557 >Because all humans are Jewish. Who else but Eve could have been the first mother to pass Judaism along to her offspring? You are the worst troll to ever exist.
>>340634 It would be hilarious but also kind of retarded if all nazi groups in germany suddenly bought this. theres nothing in it for us. it would only help our enemies really. but it would be a hell of a fucking meme and prank to play.
>>340485 >Russian and Chinese spying are the bigger threat >debatable but sure They are objectively all the same entity as usa so thats completely false.
>>340478 >The way you phrase that only exposes your agenda to make the US look bad and exposes potential distortions and alterations of facts and evidence. Yes
>>340514 >This discussion of antisemitism is detailing the thread. I don’t even see how this could be a thread for free political discussion if the only thing you’re allowed to say is “hur durr muh jooz did that”. Because this is the only truth you aren't allowed to say in public you fucking homo.
>>340700 Does Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping have any say in how American laws are passed? >>340702 I thought “I masturbate to pastel cartoon horses” was another.
>>340700 >objectively all the same entity as usa M8, you're going to have to explain that. You could say "They all corrupt/evil/zogged/etc", but "all the same entity doesn't sound very objective when referring to factions that seem to care about nothing but fighting eachother by-proxy.
>>340557 >Because all humans are Jewish. Who else but Eve could have been the first mother to pass Judaism along to her offspring? You sound like you need to hit the Bible study thread. How could they be "Jewish" if Judea hadn't even existed yet? How could they even be remotely Jewish if Abraham hadn't been born? Just because they're referenced in Jewish scripture (and by archetype, many other religions) doesn't make them Jewish. And while you could say "all humans are Jewish", the people who call themselves Jews clearly don't think that, and it's equally insulting to them as it is to the rest of us.
>>340707 >How could they be "Jewish" if Judea hadn't even existed yet? How was Abraham or Moses Jewish? >How could they even be remotely Jewish if Abraham hadn't been born? How could Abraham pass on Judaism to his descendants if he is not female? Are there any other women but Eve herself who could be candidates for the one to start the Jewish lineage?
>>340634 Watching leftists and woke normies all collectively start rooting for literal neo-nazis has been such an acid trip. Literal decades of rabid anti-nazi propaganda undone after a mere month of MSM coverage. The media has truly done a number on their brains. Where can we get such power?
>>340716 I think the left will probably come around to them soon enough. The integrity of the Ukrainian state must first be ensured, but the neo-Nazis will have to make it through the politics of Ukraine once the war is over. The Azov Battalion’s days on social media may not be very great and they would likely only be allowed to be covered in very narrow strokes if they are being praised.
Though I am currently imagining a news article 20 or so years from now about how Ukraine won the war, but their success was rooted in Naziism. I doubt there is any way for Ukraine to win it out in the long haul, but at least Russia will likely not get to keep occupying Ukraine.
>>340716 Are you surprised? "Nazi", "woke", "leftist", "racist" et cetera are just labels. They are, by now, entirely unlinked from what beliefs someone holds, and beliefs of the left of today are "political violence is justified", "the ethnicity we're being told by media to hate are subhumans deserving only violent deaths", et cetera. So of course they empathize with the kikepatsy batallion.
>>340742 Dont be salty anon, its pretty obvious what he's saying. In order for the aforementioned countries to be >objectively the same entity as usa they would have to have an over representation of __________ in their government (and industry). Fill in the blank. Hint: its 4 letters, starts with j and ends with s, and rhymes with 'lose'
>>340716 Is called meme magic and it's art. They showed the steps and the programming is there. The bonus is they are entrenched. When the time comes where (((they))) shut everything off, guess when the population of NPCs will look towards. That's right whatever is on. (((They))) want to use them for more depopulation as desposable units, to wipe us out. If instead on all air waves instead of nothing or (((their message))) it's something else. Well gee (((they))) are fucked. Maintaining contact is the next important thing. Because they are addicts. They are addicted to the shlock. The time and effort is way too much for themselves to actually remove, so instead a better alternative. If you tell them they can't have it and then have a 'leaker' share it with them. Pandemonium. They want feelings. The addiction of the feeling the ups and downs and the twists and turns and obeying without thinking. Trust the Science, it's proven. Internet scams are up by the most its ever been. The quadrupled jabbed are more than likely be extinguished, ah not before tearing everyone else apart for a 'cure'. (((They))) need to control all currency. And when (((they))) shut everything off at the height of emotion, the iron is hot and they want and cry out to be molded. Five birds at least with one shotgun.
Why is war-based rape propaganda alwasys against women. Why not little boys. Just shows the upstanding nature of the russian army that they do not allow pedo`s in their ranks.
>Germany puts Gazprom Germania under state trusteeship | DW News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvx5GeENgMk Germany takes state control over Gazprom facilities, kinda nationalizes Gazprom.
What does Zelinski actually want when he asks the UN security council to intervene and for a warcrimes tribunal? Russia is a permanent member of the security council, and not a member of the international criminal court.
>>340859 Zelinski is playing the card that Russia shouldn't have their permanent position because that position belonged to the USSR. And, since the USSR no linger exists. Russia should have their position rescinded since they are not the USSR; only one country of the USSR, just like Georgia, Ukraine, Estonia, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland. Countries who had to each have their application for U.N. membership individually filed after the fall of the USSR.
>>340864 >Russia shouldn't have their permanent position because that position belonged to the USSR. Like hell that'll hold up. They've been in the council for more than 30 years. And Russia is a permanent member of the security council for the same reason the USSR was: it's powerful, and the UN doesn't want to provoke powerful countries.
>There MIGHT be a Plan to Rebuild Khazaria as Zelensky Says Ukraine will become 'Big Israel' >There might be a plan to remake Khazaria in Ukraine, the homeland of the fake Jews which Jesus warned about. There are several tips in the Israeli media to show this but to top it all off, Zelensky himself the Jewish president of Ukraine said that Ukraine will become “big Israel”. >In order to do this though they need to completely empty the land of Ukraine of all of its inhabitants and resettle all Jews in Israel to Ukraine. Remember the word “might” though. This is NOT a fact. This is just speculation, a possibility, but again, NOT A FACT! Only time will tell if this will happen or not. >IF this is true, then this is why they needed this fake war, to remake Big Israel and to force the women of Ukraine to flee to neighboring countries. Some fled further to Germany, UK, dreaming about raining with money from the sky but they will find soon that life will be better in the “backwards” East Europe as West will completely collapse due to upcoming hyperinflation and mass famine. https://www.eutimes.net/2022/04/there-might-be-a-plan-to-rebuild-khazaria-as-zelensky-says-ukraine-will-become-big-israel/ https://www.rt.com/russia/553365-ukraine-will-be-big-israel/
Donbass is littered with corpses of the military of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kiev refuses to take the bodies In compliance with the requirements of international humanitarian law, bodies undergo all necessary identification, documentation and burial procedures. The Ukrainian side does not respond to requests for the transfer of bodies, - reported in the DPR.
>>340908 Nationalization of global companies is actually more common than you may think. For example, the US has a law that forces broadcasting companies to be owned by US entities, so outlets like the BBC need to establish American bases.
Another example is how foreign companies in Japan oftentimes find themselves licensing local brands to sell their products in order to abide by local laws that would penalize larger outlets.
>From the intel I'm finding, it was a General who was captured while the Russians were raiding an underground bioweapon's lab that was allegedly located 8 stories beneath the Mariupol Airport. That part hasn't been verified, but the capture of U.S. Army Lieutenant General Roger L. Cloutier is coming in from multiple sources and appears to be solid
>>340928 >is coming in from multiple sources and appears to be solid Sauce on other sources? An American officer getting captured is a pretty big deal, and will have big impacts on diplomacy.
>2022-04-07 >War In Ukraine Day 41: Mariupol Trap Snaps Shut. Major Battle For Donbass Is Coming >Some sources report that the Russian Army had already taken one NATO commander, Lieutenant General Roger L. Clothier, near Mariupol. Other sources allegedly report his death. https://southfront.org/war-in-ukraine-day-41/
>>340933 My one hesitation about this report about the capture of a NATO commander is that we're over a month in, why wouldn't such a person have long since escaped the war zone? They'd have to be an idiot to stay on the front where capture was a possibility.
>>340985 >Remainder >TO CLARIFY: Early on the Pentagon commanded the Ukraine war. The Pentagon ordered the use of the Ukranian civilian population as human shields. I doubt the Pentagon ordered the killing of fleeing refugees but even the use of human shields, especially when commanded from abroad, is only one shade of gray off from that. The United States can rightfully be blamed for the atrocities that took place in Ukraine. After the capture of the American general, the American MSM and American intelligence have kicked the lie factory into overdrive, and big tech got involved openly stating they'd de-monetize every media source that did not precisely push the lies in full form. Now all we are getting is how the Russians happily raped and murdered countless civilians, all the while the bodies of the dead civilians are still scarred by openly Nazi markings that were put on them for fun. AFTER THE WESTERN MEDIA OPENLY STATED NAZI UKRANIAN FORCES WERE FIGHTING THE WAR. It was a complete flip of the narrative, like a switch, blaming Russia for leaving the Nazi markings on people when Russians are not that at all.
>So now we get to see how well Russia responds to being slandered like that, AND how well Russia responds to being attacked for something they never did. Let me re-post an item from yesterday. IMPORTANT: There are more posts from today after this if you saw it before. Thanks for posting this. >mfw contemplating the chain of events this very probably just set in motion Have a badass Rig from a Walmart as a brain cleanse
>Here's Arnab Goswami lambasting American Professor Charles Kupchan. What follows after the Professor tells India to 'get off the fence' (with regards to world coming together against Russia) can only be described as igniting a fuse under the hosts' chair. This video has gone viral in China.
>>340988 >>340995 It seems as though Fox News massively stands to gain from this if one of their own is being used as a propaganda instrument by Russia.
>>341005 You still do not get it. It is ALL SCRIPTED, Putin, Biden, Macron, Zelenski, work for the same mafia. Granted, they all proclaim anger and threats while killing thousands in the name of their righteous cause; but it is a charade and part of the freemasonic Problem-Reaction-Solution formula.
>>341007 It's highly unlikely to be scripted. Putin and Xi want to establish their own brand of globalism with Russia and China at the top of the pile instead of America. America/Europe/NATO want to maintain the """free world""" status quo. The Jews/Freemasons/Whatever probably don't care who gets to be bottom bitch, so they're letting the two sides duke it out for their amusement.
When you gaze into the void the void looks back. Make a choice among these three. I foretell this prophecy. Faggots will Screee. Anons have glee. Ponies enter reality.
>>341015 It isn’t the Jews, since the “Jewish question” has been answered by >>340822 → and >>340824 →. The Freemasons are probably not it either, since they would have taken over already if the US has already had so many Freemason presidents.
If anyone, I may say it is the left and their narrative to make sure everyone else but them looks guilty and cannot win arguments without sounding like villains.
>>341007 >>341015 >scripted In the same sense that a game of chess between two knowledgeable and skilled opponents (not necessarily referring to either Putin or Biden, the latter especially) could be scripted by inevitability of good stratregy, none of this has to be literally scripted to achieve the same effect. Point being, I agree with both in that it is unlikely that they are reading from a script per say, but also unlikely that there is no coordonation going on some (((level))). If this proves true with the general guy, theres 0 doubt that US govt will still mobilize anti-sedition and wartime treason laws domestically, the propoganda machines will no doubt fall in line with narrative-2.0... Basically, if ya'all thought Covid lockdowns and repression was bad,....
>>341013 You're a retard if you believe Biden has any power >>341015 It isn't scripted, just like all wars since ww2, it's 2 jewish sides jerking off to dead white people. >>341017 kys fed >>341018 "whatever" seemed to mean all of the other groups aligned with the jews that aren't jews or masons. Christians, for example.
>>341028 >You're a retard if you believe Biden has any power He could have just as easily endorsed Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and sent him supplies and weapons instead. >kys fed >slinging insults instead of arguments Cringe.
>>341034 It has already been proven by others on this board that the Jews are not the global puppet masters that many claim them to be and the Freemasons had their chance and did nothing. I sincerely doubt it is either of them who would have control over everything if anyone even does.
Pretty classic right here. You guys had info I haven't seen elsewhere yet in the last couple days and this guy shows up going all in for masons, picking sides, yadda, yadda, yadda. At least he's proven a completely insincere paid actor so just stop feeding and just move on. At some point hopefully he'll have garnered enough shekels and will go get some lunch.
>>341036 Its 'control' in a parliamentary system; theres a CEO/Chairperson, etc. Jews and masons both have a seat at the table, no doubt there, but so do the chinese, et al.
>>341036 >It has already been proven by others on this board that the Jews are not the global puppet masters that many claim them to be and the Freemasons had their chance and did nothing. Would you be so kind to point at those enlightened posts?
>>341033 The part where you respond with "cringe" in response to someone's post you're not happy with, often without even refuting it. You sound like a redditor.
>>341039 >>341042 Please see the posts referred to by >>341017. >>341066 Good luck trying to sell the same form of energy that caused the Fukushima, Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl disasters, even with the latest and safest reactors.
>>341073 Nuclear energy is the only hope for saving our civilization in the face of population growth and changing natural climates. It's critical for energy independence of various countries, and if properly implemented it could increase quality of life all over the world while raising life quality to decadent levels in countries able to enact widespread implementation as energy production outpaces consumption.
>>341077 OK, but many are unwilling to accept the potential consequences of nuclear energy if those disasters were any indication of what could happen.
>>341081 >potential consequences of nuclear Overblown and exagerrated by media fearmongering and interest groups that don't want the technology proliferated because it might change the global system where they're on top. The benefits far outweigh the risks, which are close to zero if the plants are managed properly. Nuclear energy is the cleanest, safest and least-destructive form of energy. >many are unwilling And the sooner they open their eyes and see through the fog of propaganda, the sooner they'll see the world-changing benefits nuclear energy can bring.
>>341073 Hot take: oil and natural gas have contributed more ecological disasters and killed FAR more people than nuclear energy has. Just look at how much damage we've had from oil spills over the years. Nuclear has a fucking stellar safety record by comparison, but it just gets way more publicity when things go bad.
>>341083 >The benefits far outweigh the risks, which are close to zero if the plants are managed properly. And therein lies the problem. Human error can cause catastrophic failure and for cities to be irradiated. If everything needs to be that precisely measured, is the reward worth the risk? >And the sooner they open their eyes and see through the fog of propaganda, the sooner they'll see the world-changing benefits nuclear energy can bring. And I’m pretty sure that some may still support prescribing heroin as a painkiller. >Hot take: oil and natural gas have contributed more ecological disasters and killed FAR more people than nuclear energy has. They cause global disasters slowly, but nuclear energy can cause local disasters quickly.
>>341085 This (it's not a hot take at all, it's just fact) Coalfire plants produce more harmful radiation than nuclear reactors. Nuclear energy is incredibly safe if the operators have the right expertise, codes and techonolgy to build the plant properly. It can generate enormous amounts of energy even in countries with scarce natural resources, which is one of its main advantages over fossil fuels.
But no, built more ugly, rickety windmills that kill bald eagles by the hundred, and enormous solar farms that produce enormous amounts of toxic waste from spent panels that we're dependent on materials from China to manufacture.
>>341089 >Human error can cause catastrophic failure and for cities to be irradiated. Human error can fuck up anything. by that logic, we shouldn't build dams either because they can wipe out cituies when compromised. That's just reason for countries with nuclear technology to share that technology and expertise, so developing countries can build nuclear reactors safely. >If everything needs to be that precisely measured, is the reward worth the risk? Yes 1000%. >heroin as a painkiller And next you're going to say that opiate medications of any kind or strength should be banned due to the opiate epidemic the phamacudical industry has caused, based on the logic you're applying to nuclear energy. Better, safer implementations exist. We don't ban all cars because of car crashes. We don't ban all planes because of plane crashes. We don't ban oil rigs because of oil spills. We shouldn't give up on nuclear energy because of a couple unfortunate cases; in fact, we should should be investing more into nuclear energy to develop safer, more-affordable means to implement it across the globe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjM9E6d42-M There is also thorium generation, which is more efficient, produces more energy, is more plentiful, and is safer in both mining and operation. Thorium also can't go critical in the same way uranium can which is basically a nuclear chain reaction. Thorium undergoes heating which can melt a safety stop in the reactor and separate from the needed plutonium to cause the reaction. This means the likelihood of devastation is very low. Improper maintenance might still cause the stop to fail, but then you just have the normal uranium containment situation.
Overall, investors and governments are fucking us over with outdated energy production from uranium because they don't want to shell out some cash on a useful project that can make returns long term. Why bother when you can own both terrible energy supplies and have the public choose their poison: green energy with top-down control and shortages, or environmental damage and corporate takeover?
>>341094 Thorium is incredible because its relative stability create the option for poorer developing countries to implement nuclear tech. There should be a nuclear power plant in every city. Also, with the new advent of nuclear fusion, we could have potential to create a world where in some-place things like 'energy cost' are practically nonexistent. With energy costs mitigated by fantastic energy production, new industries, products, and lifestyles never before possible could emerge as consumption becomes easier. Fusion-powered water desalination, fusion-powered steel manufacturing, fusion-powered bullet trains, fusion-powered wide-range internet connectivity, etc.
>>341090 Would you rather trust someone who tried to kill himself with his car on in a locked garage with a car or would you rather trust a person who had previously shot you through the head with a gun? Keep in mind that you can more easily save someone in the former scenario if suffocation is a slower death than a bullet to the head. >>341092 >Human error can fuck up anything. by that logic, we shouldn't build dams either because they can wipe out cituies when compromised. But at least nature has no bad actors and the dams cannot be intentionally sabotaged without anyone noticing, so it can be more easily controlled. Human error in nuclear energy is easier to cause if people are more motivated to cause it. >And next you're going to say that opiate medications of any kind or strength should be banned due to the opiate epidemic the phamacudical industry has caused, based on the logic you're applying to nuclear energy. You are still not understanding that heroin had its benefits as a painkiller, but it has been determined that it is an addictive drug that can easily kill in the wrong dosage. Similarly, nuclear energy has its benefits as an efficient energy source, but the drawbacks may only spell disaster. >>341094 And it is also possible that they do no better for the environment. https://www.thejakartapost.com/amp/opinion/2022/03/11/thorium-fueled-nuclear-reactors-wont-help-cut-emissions.html >>341096 You are assuming thorium grows on trees and/or is easy to source.
>>341100 Emissions don't matter, though it would help as it would replace energy methods that produce more emissions and waste as the power that comes from thorium is greater than uranium and coal plus is makes less waste on its own than uranium.
Also, you just posted premium content. I can't even read that article to respond to it. Post the text and I will address if it has any good arguments.
>>341100 >dams cannot be intentionally sabotaged without anyone noticing Neither can nuclear power plants. >more easily controlled You can drive across dams with carbombs. Just try doing that at a nuclear power plant. >human error Does not mean the technology itself should be scrapped, only that it should be taken seriously and safety protocals should be followed. >Similarly, nuclear energy has its benefits as an efficient energy source, but the drawbacks Heroin, like uranium, has safer alternatives. Thorium is safer than uranium, and even safer forms of nuclear energy could be developed if the science is invested into and shared. >jarkapost >"This article is premium content" How is anyone supposed to take your citation seriously if it's stuck behind a paywall? Are we supposed to just take your word for it that the argument is solid? Did you even read it yourself? Provide screencaps/copy+paste the section you're citing, or fuck off. >assuming thorium grows on trees and/or is easy to source Based on the amount of energy it produces, it's far, far, far cheaper than any fossil fuel or the infrastructure necessary to build 'renewable' energy sources. If the same amount of research and investment dedicated to acquisition of fossil fuels were invested towards nuclear materials, it could be even cheaper than it already is. Considering it could break international depencence on foriegn-sourced fossil fuels (the entire premise of this argument), cost to source it is well-worth the investment.
>>341108 It astounds me how brainlets want to reduce emmissions and yet also want to get rid of nuclear plants. Widespread construction and implementation of nuclear power plants should be a #1 infrastructure priority. Everyone benefits from cheap energy.
Creating an energy crisis and raising the prices is just a part of the WEF plan to make all the common people as poor as possible. You will own nothing and you will be happy.
>>341108 >Emissions don't matter, though it would help as it would replace energy methods that produce more emissions and waste as the power that comes from thorium is greater than uranium and coal plus is makes less waste on its own than uranium. But what is the potential for another Chernobyl or Three Mile Island disaster happening? >You can drive across dams with carbombs. Just try doing that at a nuclear power plant. It is harder at a dam because they have perimeter security that one must pass through like at an airport. People on the outside would more easily notice something going on and all cars would be inspected. >How is anyone supposed to take your citation seriously if it's stuck behind a paywall? In the fields of journalism and scholarly research, the amount one has to pay to access content like that is irrelevant to its validity, judging by how often premium articles are cited in such publications. Many articles on Wikipedia cite premium content and/or books that one needs to purchase or rent. >Did you even read it yourself? Provide screencaps/copy+paste the section you're citing, or fuck off. That would probably violate copyright law and put me in jail. >Based on the amount of energy it produces, it's far, far, far cheaper than any fossil fuel or the infrastructure necessary to build 'renewable' energy sources. But where is the nearest thorium mine to where you live?
>>341120 >what is the potential for another Chernobyl or Three Mile Island disaster happening? Close to zero. > they have perimeter security that one must pass through Nuclear plants have even stronger perimeters. >premium Nobody here is going to pay to read that, so tell us what it said or fuck off. I bet you didn't even read it. >muh copyright law Then paraphrase the arguments. >nearest thorium mine Pic related.
>>341120 >>341073 >another Chernobyl Big, flat zero. The reactors that could fail that way had their control rods replaced with safe design by the end of the same year (without even notifying the engineers and staff), and the computers in the plant couldn't predict the state of the reactor because they were too slow - we have CPUs millions of times faster nowadays in fucking phones. >or Three Mile Island That shit didn't even leave containment. >Mayak Zero unless people deliberately ignore the changes done to nuclear fuel protocols specifically to avoid this happening again. >Fukushima Don't use power reactors to as weapons-grade plutonium breeders and don't be a complete cretin in how you build them. That trainwreck was astronomical units away from a "latest and safest reactor". >>341112 >Everyone benefits from cheap energy. Except from the people benefitting from costly energy. >>341090 >Coalfire plants produce more harmful radiation than nuclear reactors. That's the most comedic part of it, and it's because coal has thorium in it. >>341096 >Thorium is incredible because its relative stability create the option for poorer developing countries to implement nuclear tech. Considering the whole "requires plutonium to run", it'll just create an Africa situation: the "developing country" being dependent on hand-me-downs instead of creating their own tech. You need uranium plants to be able to produce plutonium yourself.
>>341169 >coal has thorium in it And unlike a reactor plant, coal ash from a coalfire plant is uncontained. The government doesn't even classify coal ash as toxic waste, so they dump it all over the place. >Except from the people benefitting from costly energy. You mean ultra-rich energy tycoons? They'll be fine. If anything they'll benefit because they'll have more energy to sell to more people. Besides, more cheapenergy would enable people to live lifestyles that consume more energy, creating entire new industries and jobs that would employ and enrich millions. > the "developing country" being dependent on hand-me-downs instead of creating their own tech That's already the state of things for most energy infrastructure; in developing countries most of it is outsourced in the beginning. Not to meantion other countries are dependent on fossil-fuel and mineral rich countries. Small amounts of radioactive materials can power entire countries for centuries, which is preferable to being dependent on Russians and Saudis for oil. Besides, if the tech becomes widespread, other countries will be able to do research to develop reactors on their own with independent means.
>>341171 >You mean ultra-rich energy tycoons? They'll be fine. If anything they'll benefit because they'll have more energy to sell to more people. You, uh, understand neither psychology nor economy. >and jobs that would employ and enrich millions. The ultra-rich energy tycoons want as few people enriched as possible, ideally only the directors/CEO with everyone else being in poverty. They will oppose anything that compromises this. >Besides, if the tech becomes widespread, other countries will be able to do research to develop reactors on their own with independent means. Let me rephrase. Ability to independently run nuclear power plants is ability to manufacture nukes. And the countries that already have a nuclear arsenal are extremely possessive about their bitsy big-boy boomeroos. >which is preferable to being dependent on Russians and Saudis for oil. They'll still be dependent on them for oil for plastics and car fuel (because manufacturing costs and waste for electric cars are obscene), just not for grid power.
>>341231 >psychology nor economy 'Psychology' can be improved by propaganda/messaging, and the economy can be adapted with proper planning. >The ultra-rich energy tycoons want as few people enriched as possible Which is why we should split their throats alongside their kike enablers. >Ability to independently run nuclear power plants is ability to manufacture nukes. Good. >And the countries that already have a nuclear arsenal are extremely possessive about their bitsy big-boy boomeroos. Which is of course the main obstacle that needs to be overcome for global prosperity. It's in everyone's interest to stop glowniggers from hoarding the technology. >They'll still be dependent on them for oil for plastics and car fuel (because manufacturing costs and waste for electric cars are obscene), just not for grid power. True, but energy independence is still a good thing.
>>341231 >>341237 >nukes Except thorium can't be weaponized effectively. It is fairly stable and needs plutonium to start the reaction, meaning that the bomb potential is rather small and costly compared to if you just used it for economic gain through power production. If you wanted to weaponize it, it would be better to just go pure plutonium.
>>341239 >>341237 But again, would you rather trust someone who just tried to kill himself in his garage using his car exhaust with a car or would you rather trust someone who just shot you through the head with a gun?
>Russian State Duma Deputy Confirms: NATO Instructors Trapped in Mariupol Factory >“I would give them advice: don’t get on helicopters. Better hang out the [white] flag, come to us.” >State Duma deputy Adam Delimkhanov in an interview with RT correspondent Vlad Andritsa about NATO instructors stuck in Mariupol at Azovstal: >“They communicate through people, we have an operational headquarters [working] on this. How to negotiate, how to talk - there are mediators who are working on this. >We heard many times that they are very strenuously striving to take away by helicopters, but the air defense of the Russian Ministry of Defense is the best in the world, and they will not get away from us. I am sure that the downed helicopters… It was just intended to take them out.” >According to Delimkhanov, there are a lot of people there: “I think there will be a hundred.” https://www.bitchute.com/video/72MTe5On9t9Y/
>>341238 >>341239 >needs plutonium >to manufacture your own plutonium, you need uranium (breeder) reactors >if you have those, you can manufacture plutonium not just for thorium reactors, but for nukes as well Capische? >>341256 Who is this F4-looking fuck? >Russia is about to fucking kill everybody Good.
>>341100 >But at least nature has no bad actors and the dams cannot be intentionally sabotaged without anyone noticing You mean like the Three Gorges Dam in China? Where the entire thing is about to burst, which will results in millions dying, but the government denies it as "Western propaganda"?
>>341120 >But what is the potential for another Chernobyl or Three Mile Island disaster happening? No one died at Three Mile Island, not as a result of it, so what are you talking about? As for Chernobyl, that was due to the Soviets making cheap uranium casings that actually accelerated nuclear fusion, the plant having spent the previous day doing nothing but tests and never giving the reactors the chance to cool down, and the inspector in charge telling the plant operates to ignore all safety protocols or receive a one-way trip to Siberia.
>>341169 >Don't use power reactors to as weapons-grade plutonium breeders and don't be a complete cretin in how you build them. The problem with Fukushima is that the plant had failed ALL safety and security inspections both before the incident, and after the incident event to this day. However, for God knows why, the Japanese government refuses to prosecute TEPCO for this.
>>341231 >Ability to independently run nuclear power plants is ability to manufacture nukes. No, it is not, you idiot. For the plants back in the 50's and 60's, yes, because they used those plants to refine uranium so it can be used in nuclear bombs. However, those types of reactors are extremely wasteful of uranium, and have not been built in decades. The types of plants they've been building for the past 50 years, however, actually refine uranium specifically for the purpose of energy purposes, cannot be used for the purposes of making bombs, and is actually quite resourceful as you can keep recycling the same uranium used for years.
That's also ignoring the fact that nuclear plants, themselves, are nothing more than water boils, that use the nuclear reaction as a way to produce heat.
>>341240 That comparison doesn't work because of the fail safes in place, thanks to everything being computerized, that prevent nuclear meltdowns from ever occurring. Ironically, in today's world, nuclear power plants are the safest locations one can be at.
>>341308 I’m not using it as a comparison of failsafes, but rather the psychology of what people believe to be more dangerous.
You see, dying in a locked garage with a car on is a slow death and people could theoretically save one’s life very easily were that to ever come about. Dying from a bullet wound to the head is a quick death that is nearly impossible to recover from.
Likewise, death from the consequences of fossil fuel emissions is very slow and it is theoretically easy to slow down and/or stop. Death from a nuclear meltdown is relatively quick and nearly impossible to stop.
>>341310 >but rather the psychology of what people believe to be more dangerous. People think that crazed shooters are the bigger threats to their livelihood than their own health, car crashes, or death by cow; despite the stats saying otherwise. Fear of the possible is not an excuse. > Death from a nuclear meltdown is relatively quick and nearly impossible to stop. Except that has NEVER happened outside of the USSR.
>Ozzy and Sharon Osbourne Urge Everyone to Call for Support for Ukraine | Stand Up for Ukraine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqyfLOBXOKI Washed up drug addict and his jewess.
>>341314 >Argument us about nuclear power plants <Uses nuclear bombings as an example of deaths Also: https://archive.ph/FA3nu > Ms. Akiko Takakura was 20 years old when the bomb fell...She is one of the few survivors who was within 300 meters of the hypocenter. So much for nuclear weapons vaporizing people and giving all their survivors cancer and dying within years. She's still alive to this day.
>>341308 >The problem with Fukushima Is that it was a power reactor being used to breed plutonium instead. Only one reactor there melted down, the rest, despite experiencing the same tsunami and blackout and shit, SCRAMmed just fine because they were not used for breeding. >However, for God knows why, the Japanese government refuses to prosecute TEPCO for this. See above. The fallout has isotopes that can only appear in breeders. If they prosecute, they have to admit they were blatantly misusing the reactor, if they don't, they have the same kind of plausible deniability Israel has with its nuclear arsenal. >No, it is not, you idiot. >because they used those plants to refine uranium so it can be used in nuclear bombs. Are you genuinely retarded? To refine uranium for nukes, all you need is an isotope centrifuge (and spectacular quantities of uranium). Reactors make other elements entirely, namely, plutonium. >cannot be used for the purposes of making bombs Now look at what I just said about Fukushima and stfu. >>341310 >Death from a nuclear meltdown is relatively quick and nearly impossible to stop. You can only die from a nuclear meltdown if you go hug the corium or do something equally retarded, or were right next to the reactor (as in, literally standing above or below the active zone). Even the fallout is a very slow death, and in Chernobyl in particular more people died from thinking the same retarded shit as you ("I'm gonna die from DA RADS anyway so I can get in fights and drink all I want") than how many would die according to calculations if they were told absolutely nothing and remained in Pripyat.
>>341307 Stop linking to your own posts. We all saw them retard. >the psychology of what people believe to be more dangerous In the words of Ben Shapiro: Facts don't care about your feelings.
People need to be educated to undo decades of anti-nuclear propaganda.
>>341321 >>341370 It is still the exact same phenomenon of radiation poisoning from a nuclear device that causes death. >>341369 Tell that to the families of the Chernobyl victims.
>>341376 >Tell that to the families of the Chernobyl victims. You mean the people who went on the (super irradiated) roof hourly to replace the flag? Or the ones who didn't use dosimeters (and thus got excessive rads) because it was, I almost quote, "not cool"? Or the ones who tossed irradiated materials into burial pits by shovel and hand? Hint: all of that qualifies as "equally retarded or being right next to the reactor", and it's very much not an exhaustive list. >>341384 >10 I give it 2.
>>341376 >It is still the exact same phenomenon No, it's really not. They don't work the same way, and you're being evasive on the subject of reactors. >Tell that to the families of the Chernobyl victims. They would know their country's history and know that the Chernobyl tragedy was 102% preventable and would never happen again. That's why Ukraine depends heavily on nuclear energy despite Chernobyl. They have 15 reactors generating nearly a quarter of their energy, and had plans to build more like we all should. >>341393 What are you even talking about?
>>341405 Am I seriously one of two people on the planet who are positing that Ukraine and Israel are in very similar situations regarding their rights to exist?
>>341413 >>341414 If Ukraine demilitarizes, it may no longer exist if Russia fails to do so as well. There would need to be a neutral third party whose military power rivals Ukraine’s and Russia’s in order to make sure both sides are playing fair and the world does not seem very neutral on the Ukrainian issue right now; most countries have already chosen sides.
And who says that both Palestine and Israel can’t exist? Israel wants Palestine to exist and seems to be willing to allow them much of their territory, but the Palestinian Authority and its allies seem to always reject the notion of Israel existing.
>>341415 >There would need to be a neutral third party whose military power rivals Ukraine’s and Russia’s You're not fooling anyone. Russia will sufice.
>>341415 >There would need to be a neutral third party whose military power rivals Ukraine’s and Russia’s in order to make sure both sides are playing fair jewkraine and nato are not playing fair you buffoon. > Israel wants Palestine to exist and seems to be willing to allow them much of their territory, but the Palestinian Authority and its allies seem to always reject the notion of Israel existing. Cope Faggot, the kikes hate the Palestinians.
>>341416 >tfw Putin becomes the next Catherine the Great and is too distracted by cumming inside a mare to discipline the birdbrains who are the KGB Forty cakes. >>341417 I don’t see how if they would benefit from arbitrating the conflict. >>341419 >jewkraine and nato are not playing fair you buffoon. Russia has about four times as many active duty troops as Ukraine does, as well as the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. I don’t see how they would not be playing fair unless they are in serious breach of international law and a neutral party with completely neutral sources can determine so. >Cope Faggot, the kikes hate the Palestinians. That’s like saying I hate all Russians because of this conflict. I’d rather not get into the details of it for obvious reasons, but I do know at least one current and one former Russian national and they seem like they are very kind people. If they took Russia’s side on Ukraine, they probably would not be working in the jobs they are in.
>>341424 Sure, but that promiscuous covenant enters in conflict with many national constitutions, then it sounds to me like that agreement is void and null. Either a nation is sovereign or not, if not for virtue of that "international law", then a repudiation or denunciation is due.
>>341421 >Russia has about four times as many active duty troops as Ukraine does, as well as the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. I don’t see how they would not be playing fair Are you for realsies? >>341432 >Constitution of United States Call me when Second Amendment is actually enforced hint hint you're the one who's supposed to be enforcing it with the armaments it allows you to own, which is to say, any of them. Your Constitution is a joke.
>>341434 >Are you for realsies? I don’t understand. Russia is the dominant military force in the region and you’re accusing the underdog of being the aggressor? To use the words of AlternateHistoryHub, your accusation would be like accusing an ant of defying a boot. >Call me when the Second Amendment is actually enforced Good luck convincing the racist inner city Democrats to become willing to allow people of color to own guns. Though a recent incident in California may have only opened up the thought that gun control measures don’t work, or at least not on the state or local level. >Your Constitution is a joke. Perhaps, but the last amendment to it was an item of consideration for about 200 years until it was finally ratified. The states are right now so partisan that altering it any further and making it any less of a joke is a near impossibility.
>>341437 But why would you want people who had previously been convicted by an impartial jury of a violent crime to own a gun? Granted, there are some issues to be worked out in the way of making it better for POC’s to own and carry guns, but at face value, it is not unreasonable to forbid people who have previously been convicted of such offenses to carry guns, or at least to give them harsher sentences.
To put it another way, if Putin had a hit on you and the KGB agent who was in charge of killing you was arrested, tried, and convicted, would you want him to continue to be able to have his gun?
>>341439 So you would want to make it easier for your assassin to try and kill you after he has already been convicted by not taking his right to own a firearm away from him or at least by abridging it?
Also, the Supreme Court has previously interpreted the Second Amendment as limited in scope, though people can’t be denied the right to own a firearm as residents of Washington, DC essentially were.
>>341436 >I don’t understand. Russia is the dominant military force in the region and you’re accusing the underdog of being the aggressor? Do not put words in my mouth, pig. You're claiming, quote, >Russia has about four times as many active duty troops as Ukraine does, as well as the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. I don’t see how [jewkraine and nato] would not be playing fair Which is unbelievably retarded, because being stronger is exact reason why the weaker side would NOT play fair. >Good luck convincing the racist inner city Democrats to become willing to allow people of color to own guns. lmao what Have you spent last two years on a fucking island, you retarded niggershill? Dems are funding Burn Loot Murder, the only "pox" they don't want to allow owning guns are white. >>341438 >But why would you want people who had previously been convicted by an impartial jury of a violent crime to own a gun? Because they already own guns, you brain-dead cretin, just illegally. Everyone being free to carry guns, anywhere, at all times means that whenever they try to repeat the violence, someone nearby pulls out a gun and ends them. Ever thought why shootings near-always happen in "gun free" zones, you leftoid shit-for-brains? >>341440 >has previously interpreted the Second Amendment as limited in scope Unconstitutional. Any such "interpretation" should have been immediately vetoed, with repeated attempts being vetoed by application of gunfire directly to the fuckhead's skull. The reason USA is in such a shitter now is because people refused to exercise their constitutional obligations to keep the government in check.
>>341442 It goes without saying that we need an enforcer of constitutional law and an arbiter of what is and is not constitutional. Without a binding arbiter, states would be free to break free of the Union and perhaps even side with or become parts of enemy nations, especially since nothing in the constitution as written explicitly forbids state secession. And I doubt an amendment that would do so would ever pass, since all 50 states have tried to secede at least once. >>341443 >Which is unbelievably retarded, because being stronger is exact reason why the weaker side would NOT play fair. If playing fair means giving in and surrendering due to stronger force alone, then they should play dirty and be proud of it. Anything else would endanger Ukraine’s existence as a nation. >Have you spent last two years on a fucking island, you retarded niggershill? Dems are funding Burn Loot Murder, the only "pox" they don't want to allow owning guns are white. Studies have shown that gun control laws are usually enforced against POC’s more than white people. For example, 90% of people stopped by New York’s stop-and-frisk program were of color and there were few, if any, times where a single weapon was found. A white woman in Florida was also acquitted under their stand-your-ground law of firing a warning shot at her husband, but a black woman was convicted of the same offense. Finally, people like Philando Castile have to live in fear of others fearing their right to own a firearm to the point where they lose their lives. >Because they already own guns, you brain-dead cretin, just illegally. He would probably be caught and/or given an even harsher sentence if he were to try to get another gun, though. >Ever thought why shootings near-always happen in "gun free" zones, you leftoid shit-for-brains? Which is why I don’t necessarily support arbitrary gun-free zoning in municipalities. >>341445 >Then why do they keep annexing their land and shelling their infrastructure? In order for Israel to maintain its territorial integrity. There have been five different proposals to partition the region between the Jews and Arabs, with Israel accepting all of them, no matter how small the Jewish partitions are nor whether Jerusalem was included in their partitions. Israel has consistently accepted coexistence in the region with their Arab neighbors, but as evidenced by Yasser Arafat’s blunders and at least two declarations of war, their neighbors want nothing less than Israel being wiped off the map. Israel would like to allow Palestine the right to exist, but only as long as they allow Israel the same.
>>341447 Then I wish you good luck when the governments of Russia and/or China begin to influence your state’s politics in order to get enough supporters behind its annexation.
>>341436 >I don’t understand. Russia is the dominant military force in the region and you’re accusing the underdog of being the aggressor? You understand it very well. Ukraine was groomed to antagonize Russia. It reminds me of the Georgia case, after years of American grooming and assurances, the Georgians attacked Ossetia and a Russian detachment, it went badly for the America's pets.
>>341450 So a poorly equipped and militarized nation should always surrender to a better equipped and militarized one just because they support some particular faction? Even if Georgia were a US puppet, your logic is very flawed. I don’t understand how this medieval policy of territorial control and the domination of stronger powers should even apply in the year 2022. Humans have learned from millions of years of conflict and have since become more peaceable. Grow up and open your eyes to the reality of the situation. If the people of Georgia and Ukraine did not want to lose their sovereignties and viewed themselves as puppets, they would likely have supported Russia’s actions. >>341451 Then perhaps they should keep going, especially with antisemitism in their neighboring countries having been a thing for decades and bibles being banned in them.
>>341399 >That's why Ukraine depends heavily on nuclear energy despite Chernobyl. They have 15 reactors generating nearly a quarter of their energy, and had plans to build more like we all should. That's also ignoring that Chernobyl is still in the use. The reactors kept going until the final chamber gave out two decades ago, and functions today as a conduit for funneling energy from other reactors across the country.
>>341446 >In order for Israel to maintain its territorial integrity. How is expanding ther borders to twice what it originally was "territorial integrity"? Israel is much, much bigger than it was when it was established. They've been stealing land for decades. And Israel stole Palestine's territory in the first place: all of the territory is Palestine's territory. That'd be like me coming into your house and annexing four fifths of it, and saying you should be greatful that I'm offering you one fifth of what was your house. Would you say the same thing about Russia if they annexed the majority of Ukraine and then offered them a tiny sliver of it instead, and then used the rejection of that deal by a random organization they'e chosen to consider the "authority" of it as an excuse for further shelling and annexation of that region?
And despite claiming to offer back bits and pieces of what they stole, they haven't even made plans for how they would hypothetically relecate Israelis from those regions, because they have no intent to enact the deal if the so-called Palestinian Authority (that they've conveniently chosen to talk to exclusively) actually took those absurd deals.
>>341446 >Without a binding arbiter, states would be free to break free of the Union and perhaps even side with or become parts of enemy nations, especially since nothing in the constitution as written explicitly forbids state secession. Good. States should be free to secede if they so choose. If the Union doesn't want those states to secede, they should make it so that the Union is worth staying in and not malign its member states. >If playing fair means giving in and surrendering due to stronger force alone, then they should play dirty and be proud of it. Anything else would endanger Ukraine’s existence as a nation. I actually agree with this. 'Rules' of war are stupid. However, complaining about alleged warcrimes when you commit them yourself is equally stupid.
>>341440 >you would want to make it easier for your assassin to try and kill you after he has already been convicted by not taking his right to own a firearm away from him or at least by abridging it? Yes. Gun rights are absolute. Also, if he was convicted, why isn't he in prison? If he served his sentence he should still have his gun rights. >Supreme Court has previously interpreted the Second Amendment as limited in scope And that was wrong. >>341438 >would you want people who had previously been convicted by an impartial jury of a violent crime to own a gun? Yes. You shouldn't lose rights for prior offenses. >it is not unreasonable to forbid people who have previously been convicted of such offenses to carry guns, or at least to give them harsher sentences. Yes, it is unreasonable. It's a constitutional right and shouldn't be infringed upon. >if Putin had a hit on you and the KGB agent who was in charge of killing you was arrested, tried, and convicted, would you want him to continue to be able to have his gun? This is such a lazy strawman. Ignoring the absurdity of the assassination situation, Russia doesn't have gun rights like the United States does (which is shitty). Regardless of what country it is though, I think all men deserve gun rights. Second of all, if this high-profile criminal somehow served his long sentence and came out of the prison system as an old man, he should still have his gun rights. I'd want that man to have all of his guns. I'm not afraid of that shit.
>>341436 >Russia is the dominant military force in the region and you’re accusing the underdog of being the aggressor? >would be like accusing an ant of defying a boot. I've seen you make the exact same arguments about Israel and Palestine. Think outside the box for once.
>>341459 >How is expanding ther borders to twice what it originally was "territorial integrity"? Israel is willing to accept controlling very little territory in the region, but only as long as its opponents recognize Israel’s existence. Since the latter is not going to happen anytime soon, Israel must maintain control over the territories in question in order to avoid looking weak or giving those who want it to not exist an upper hand. >And Israel stole Palestine's territory in the first place: all of the territory is Palestine's territory. And that territory was stolen from the UK, who stole it from the Ottomans, who stole it from numerous caliphates, who stole it from the Byzantines, who stole it from the Romans, etc. Handing it over to whoever was last in line will mean someone else may come back and assert his own claim. >And despite claiming to offer back bits and pieces of what they stole, they haven't even made plans for how they would hypothetically relecate Israelis from those regions, because they have no intent to enact the deal if the so-called Palestinian Authority (that they've conveniently chosen to talk to exclusively) actually took those absurd deals. Because there is no place to relocate them to, since Israel must continue to exist for as long as antisemitism exists and Jews do not feel comfortable living anywhere they feel unwelcome. Plus, they have since outlawed Jewish settlement in those regions. >>341460 >States should be free to secede if they so choose. If the Union doesn't want those states to secede, they should make it so that the Union is worth staying in and not malign its member states. So if the state next to yours decides to secede from the Union and join the Russian Federation, how would you feel? What if it were used as a landing base for a larger Russian invasion and Russia was able to convince the people of other states around it to do the same thing if they did not invade them? >>341462 >This is such a lazy strawman. Ignoring the absurdity of the assassination situation, Russia doesn't have gun rights like the United States does (which is shitty). Regardless of what country it is though, I think all men deserve gun rights. It was clearly referring to a KGB agent on American soil. >Second of all, if this high-profile criminal somehow served his long sentence and came out of the prison system as an old man, he should still have his gun rights. I'd want that man to have all of his guns. I'm not afraid of that shit. Even if it means he kills you before he is arrested again? To quote a professional contractor I saw on Canada’s Worst Handyman, “It doesn’t matter what you think when you’re dead.” >>341463 >I've seen you make the exact same arguments about Israel and Palestine. Think outside the box for once. The argument can be made because Israel’s neighbors receive assistance from powerful nations such as Iran and internationally recognized terrorist organizations, so they are constantly on the brink of not existing.
>>341472 Question for you, why should Israel exist as a safe haven for criminal judeans with their own laws and border control when they force borderless anarcho-tyranny onto us?
>>341472 >since Israel must continue to exist for as long as antisemitism exists and Jews do not feel comfortable living anywhere they feel unwelcome. Plus, they have since outlawed Jewish settlement in those regions. This is so profound and glaring and yet you still don't get it. Anti-judaism can end today if jews assimilate, and it is absurd to grant them the same rights than the locals while jews persist in to be an obnoxious alien guest.
>>341474 >Question for you, why should Israel exist as a safe haven for criminal judeans with their own laws and border control when they force borderless anarcho-tyranny onto us? Who says they are forcing anything on us? Israel is not even in the top 10 world economies and they constantly rely on outside economic and military aid. >>341475 >Anti-judaism can end today if jews assimilate But the bar for assimilation can be raised at any time and may very well force Jews to give up their Jewish identities and religion. For centuries, the bar for assimilation was set at “You cannot live among us as Jews”, meaning they had to convert to Christianity in order to live in society. When Hitler was in power, the bar was raised to “You cannot live among us”, so Jews were expelled from cities across Europe and forced into ghettos. As his years in power progressed, the bar was raised again to “You cannot live”, so the Jews in the ghettos were sent to concentration camps to serve as slaves and/or be executed en masse. In short, forcing assimilation like that only raises the question of what it means and will mean.
>>341475 >Anti-judaism can end today if jews assimilate lol no, cuck. You don't just "assimilate" the world's most wretched demographic. Trying to accept kikes has already led to enough problems. Non-Whites have no place in Western civilization.
>>341472 >willing to accept controlling very little territory in the region Then why did they annex it in the first place? What's up with those west bank settlements? >in order to avoid looking weak So looking greedy and evil is better? >will mean someone else may come back and assert his own claim. The possibility of Romans, Ottomans and Byzantines laying claim to the territory is a possibility i'd be willing to accept. >they have since outlawed Jewish settlement in those regions. They have willfully neglected to enforce those laws, and that doesn't account for the land they already annexed. >So if the state next to yours decides to secede from the Union and join the Russian Federation, how would you feel? I have no idea what kind of cultural transformation that state would have to go through overnight to want to be part of Russia, but if they did hypothetically that would be their choice. >Russia was able to convince the people of other states around it to do the same thing if they did not invade them? Then I guess U.S. democracy would have already failed by then if so many states are voting to leave, and the union wouldn't be worth preserving. >Even if it means he kills you before he is arrested again? That's a risk I'd be willing to take for the preservation of gun rights. Besides, a person who'd murder me with access to KGB assassination equipment wouldn't be deterred by U.S. gun laws. >Israel’s neighbors receive assistance from powerful nations And Israel receives assistance from even more powerful nations such as the United States. Your point?
>>341475 >Anti-judaism can end today if jews assimilate >>341480 >But the bar for assimilation can be raised at any time and may very well force Jews to give up their Jewish identities and religion. The Jewish identity is, in essence, anti-assimilation. Hanukkah celebrates the Maccabees' victory over and slaughter of Jews who chose to assimilate to their Greek hosts, which led the Seleucid Empire to an assault on Jerusalem in a vain attempt to restore the peace. For a Jew, to assimilate is to betray your Jewish identity. This anti-assimilation sentiment leads naturally to the Jewish invention of the ghetto: a nation within a nation, an exclusively Jewish zone where Jewish law is observed over the law of the Gentiles. >As his years in power progressed, the bar was raised again to “You cannot live”, so the Jews in the ghettos were sent to concentration camps to serve as slaves and/or be executed en masse. I think you mean "As Jews agitated against the legitimate government of the German state, the bar was raised again to “You cannot live in Germany”, so the Jews in the ghettos were sent to concentration camps to be deported.
>>341472 >It was clearly referring to a KGB agent on American soil. >KGB assassination equipment >assassination equipment You mean handing a few shekels to gangs to deal with a problem? You mean tempting a few nigs with shoes? You mean any kind of incident that could happen anywhere? You mean a belt, rope or cloth? You mean a car accident? You mean food poisoning? You mean a tragic cleaning mishap? Look you retard any agency doesn't need to show off any fancy shit except for a brain. The common man has their wits and senses. And you want to take away the mean of defense against such people. Aw what a widdle big brain move you just did. Come on do another widdle talky. Go on explain how the television man told you that it solves all the problems.
>>341488 >For a Jew, to assimilate is to betray your Jewish identity. So how would you like it if the people of your country wanted to wipe out what makes you distinct from everyone else? Everyone has his own distinct way of living with its own minor differences. >I think you mean "As Jews agitated against the legitimate government of the German state, the bar was raised again to “You cannot live in Germany”, so the Jews in the ghettos were sent to concentration camps to be deported. Barring the atrocities committed during the Holocaust and the segregation of the German Reich by race, religion, etc., the Nazi regime was nowhere near a legitimate government. The people of Germany did not necessarily want the Nazis in power, since they were somewhat their only choice. In addition, the Nazis abolished free speech and any sort of political ideology that could replace them and made the position of the President of Germany a lifetime appointment rather than one of a limited term. >>341489 >Aw what a widdle big brain move you just did. If you think that was dumb, check out what the KGB might be planning next. https://youtu.be/_jOtVy3t7-Q
>>341500 >So how would you like it if the people of your country wanted to wipe out what makes you distinct from everyone else? The people of white countries don't want that, but the Jews in charge do.
>>341503 And why would they move to Ukraine if it is a war zone now? Why would they start the war if they would eventually have to comply with the demands set forth by Putin and his goons?
>>341500 >how would you like it if the people of your country wanted to wipe out what makes you distinct from everyone else? I go through that every day, and Jews cheer it on. >the Nazi regime was nowhere near a legitimate government. The people of Germany did not necessarily want the Nazis in power Except for when they voted for the NSWP in what was the a democratic country? >KGB This is really getting old...
>>341511 >I go through that every day, and Jews cheer it on. I don’t see why you are pointing out Jews specifically. >Except for when they voted for the NSWP in what was the a democratic country? So the promise to imprison or kill dissidents using a political party’s own private military force is still a part of a democratic country? If there was a party who did that in your country and they actually had a legitimate chance at winning, would you feel comfortable voting for any other party? >This is really getting old... If the topic of the thread is the invasion of Ukraine, I don’t see how the KGB is not on-topic.
>>341513 The “Jewish Question” has already been answered on this board. If each Jew really had thousands of goy slaves, there would only be about 250 people to control them all. Therefore, the Jews are not out to get anyone. >>341516 He has come after Georgia, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA before, so why not?
>>341522 The Jews stood to lose from 9/11, since it was an attack with antisemitic intentions. Why would they be behind it? >>341523 So if assassins are out to kill you, your response is just to “cope”?
>>341529 The two situations could not be more different. On one hand, there was a situation that stalled the US and world economies for years on end. On the other hand, there are a few thousand troops whose intentions in Ukraine are questionable, even though they make up an official battalion in the Ukrainian national guard, though this is just a drop in the bucket.
Besides, Putin has a plan of imposing Russian rule on Ukraine and depriving Ukrainian Jews of the right to a freely elected government that they normally participate in by virtue of depriving all other Ukrainians of that same right. I think the lesser of two evils is obvious.
>Russia Steps Up Efforts To Jam US-Provided GPS In Ukraine: Pentagon >The Pentagon now says Russia is in the midst of a major jamming operation attempt of Ukraine's access to GPS signals, which if successful would have a huge impact on Ukraine's ability to navigate the battlefield and operate advanced aerial systems such as drones. >What's further is that these latest efforts, which follow widespread reports that Russia jammed GPS in Ukraine just ahead of the Feb.24 invasion, appear aimed at disrupting new US-supplied equipment, in particular small advanced drones. https://www.zerohedge.com/military/russia-ratcheting-efforts-jam-us-provided-gps-signals-ukraine-pentagon
>>341438 >But why would you want people who had previously been convicted by an impartial jury of a violent crime to own a gun? >at face value, it is not unreasonable to forbid people who have previously been convicted of such offenses to carry guns, or at least to give them harsher sentences. it doesn't matter how reasonable or unreasonable, it's enshrined as a Constitutional right. After convictions, once time is served and they're released back into society, do we remove the right to free speech or habeas corpus? Stop treating people like children who needs a nanny state to decide everything. We are a free people with an obligation to arm ourselves to preserve our freedoms. That includes people persecuted by the government (activists who get higher scrutiny and BS cases made against them, black activists who march for rights while armed, etc.). This also includes all manner of arms, because the entire purpose is to defend you homeland from invasion and to deter hostile takeovers of the citizenry by the federal government.
>To put it another way, if Putin had a hit on you and the KGB agent who was in charge of killing you was arrested, tried, and convicted, would you want him to continue to be able to have his gun? holy fucking shit kill yourself. i forgot for a minute that you're just a bad faith baiter. guess the jokes on me for responding
>>341538 >After convictions, once time is served and they're released back into society, do we remove the right to free speech or habeas corpus? First, no one is likely taking those rights away barring incidents of people being fus ro dah’d or escaping justice with death, though the latter may not be used on all occasions, but it was used at Nuremberg. Second, rights only exist for as long as other people enjoy those rights. You have a right to bear arms, but only as long as you don’t use that right to deprive me of my right to live. >holy fucking shit kill yourself. i forgot for a minute that you're just a bad faith baiter. guess the jokes on me for responding It is a little late for that sort of rhetoric in response to a statement regarding the KGB in a thread about a Russian invasion of another equally sovereign nation.
>>341545 Why do Jews love trying to wear others down with silly hypotheticals? If you were a KGB assassin and Putin hired you to kill me, it would be extremely painful. For you. Hypothetically, in minecraft. Your hypotheticals aren't genuine attempts to flip the script and get people who hate the enemy to wonder "What if what I am doing to them was done to me?". They are outlandish fantasies and trick questions irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Comparing a real scenario where we are right and an imaginary scenario where we are wrong should help you spot key differences between reality and your jewish fantasy. If you want to argue jews dindu nuffin wrong and are somehow unjustly loathed, you need to justify the sham trials at Nuremburg, prove the holocaust happened and justify every jewish lie about it, justify Weimar Republic degeneracy, and invent a convincing excuse for why the Jewish sham religion says to hate and control nonjews.
>>341530 >Putin has a plan of imposing Russian rule on Ukraine I'm willing to believe it, but do you have a statement by Putin or the Russian government to this effect?
>freely elected government In 2005, Viktor Yanukovych won the Ukranian Presidential election. The EU wasn't happy with the result, so they forced Ukraine to hold a runoff election which was rigged in favor of Viktor Yushchenko. Then, in 2010, Viktor Yanukovych won the election again, which stood until 2014 when the EU once again agitated a coup in Ukraine and installed Oleksandr Turchynov as President. That same year, another rigged election was held and Petro Poroshenko was elected. In response to this and other abuses of the Donbas people by the Ukrainian government, the Donbas held a referendum to secede from Ukraine, in which slightly under 90% of the vote was in favor of secession, but was rejected by the UN and therefore the Ukrainian government. The Ukrainian government escalated their abuses of the Donbas people, going as far as military action against civilians and property, and rejecting any votes in Ukrainian elections coming from the region.
Ukraine, since it became independent from the Soviet Union in 1991, has been a hive of corruption that is repeatedly taken advantage of by UN actors, especially American politicians. There is no possibility of a free or fair election in the American sphere of influence.
>>341548 >I'm willing to believe it, but do you have a statement by Putin or the Russian government to this effect? Was the invasion of Crimea not one? >2005 >2010 The current form of government in Ukraine has only existed since 2014, so it is unfair to judge them by events that happened that long ago.
>>341558 wtf. I'm guessing that they thought that tank was one of their own? Even if it wasn't, why would the tankers wait so long to blast them? What was the last thing to go through the Ukrainian soldier's head before he died? His ass.
>Phonecall between the British mercenary 'cossackgundi' and his friend moments before surrendering (he's crying and emotional because he knows he'll be hanged after military tribunal)
>In the Kharkiv region, the Russian Army captured British armored personnel carriers AT105 "Saxon" of the 70s, decommissioned by the troops of the kingdom in 2008 and delivered to the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 2015.
>“No ammo and food” – Ukrainian marines recorded a video about the situation in Mariupol >Servicemen of the 36th Marine Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine recorded a new video about the situation in Mariupol, in which they said that they were not receiving ammunition and food. >“We continue to defend. But the reality is that the city was in a blockade, in the ring. And there is no delivery of ammunition and food, ”complained representatives of the brigade.
>Today, at the filtration center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the DPR, a militant of the Nazi Azov regiment Timonin Nikita was identified, who, dressed in civilian clothes, tried to dissolve among the refugees. But something went wrong. https://t.me/intelslava/25017
>The LPR forces have found a US-made radiation dosimeter in the liberated Ukrainian territories, supplied exclusively to American law enforcement agencies. >The LPR believes the equipment was abandoned by US instructors as the Ukrainian forces retreated. https://t.me/intelslava/24833?single
>March 23, 2022. Ukraine. Training camp and training of Ukrainian soldiers under the guidance of Israeli military specialists from the combat units of the IDF. https://t.me/intelslava/24694
>>341549 >Was the invasion of Crimea not one? The people of Crimea voted 95% to join the Russian Federation. I haven't seen anything out of the Russian government to suggest that Russia intends to annex the entirety of Ukraine, only to ensure that the will of the Republic of Crimea, the Luhansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic are respected.
>The current form of government in Ukraine has only existed since 2014, so it is unfair to judge them by events that happened that long ago. I don't see any substantive improvement on any of my complaints since 2014. The votes of the peoples of Crimea and Donbas are still not respected, either in terms of their secession or, since the Ukrainian government still considers both to be a part of Ukraine, in elections. Murders by the Ukrainian government against civilians and officials in the Donbas never ended. I have no reason to believe that, if another UN/EU/NATO skeptical president were somehow to be elected despite the obstacles the Ukrainian government puts in their way, the EU wouldn't step in again and install their choice candidate.
>>341558 Fuck, dude. That's cold blooded. I feel like somehow it's worse when they don't even know it was an enemy. Clearly from how close the tank was allowed to approach, they thought it was a friendly. Maybe the Russian tank thought they were friendly infantry too, since it got so close before deciding to fire.
>>341577 >Clearly from how close the tank was allowed to approach, they thought it was a friendly. Maybe the Russian tank thought they were friendly infantry too, since it got so close before deciding to fire. Yup, exactly that. At least they didn't feel a thing.
>>341576 >The people of Crimea voted 95% to join the Russian Federation. Since the referendum was set up by the government of Russia, I think it is very reasonable to assume that they rigged it in their own favor, judging by how Putin was able to continue to hold political office for so long and by journalists sharing information about how Russian elections are tainted. If the government of Ukraine set up the referendum, I would be willing to look at it with a slightly fresher set of eyes.
>>341576 >>341587 >The people of Crimea voted 95% to join the Russian Federation. They were forced to at gunpoint. There's a reason "polite people" is a meme, you know. >If the government of Ukraine set up the referendum It would just be biased to the same extent in the opposite direction. >>341548 So much for democracy.
>>341593 >They were forced to at gunpoint. Thank you for acknowledging this. >It would just be biased to the same extent in the opposite direction. >So much for democracy. Then how come the Scottish independence and Brexit referenda were decided by much wider margins?
>>341569 Mark my words, this will end up like the Dejima incident. >Glowniggers setup a patsy to start a political movement >Glowniggers setup a patsy to obtain nuclear material for the political movement they engineered >Glowniggers never risk actual nuclear material, bomb patsies to further their agenda It's just like my animes.
Everything happening in Ukraine reeks of bullshit. Everyone's scamming everyone else, but nobody can get at the truth because there's too many layers of deception and scams.
It's so fucked up that the Judes of Judea, called the Synagogue Of Satan in the Christian Bible, stole the history of the Christians of Israel. When jewish characters in jewish media call themselves the ultimate survivors and gloat about christian accomplishments and imaginary holohoax tales, I laugh. These lying parasites claim it's cultural appropriation for the descendants of vikings to braid their hair just because niggers don't wash their hair, and then they produce adverts saying niggers had viking ancestors. Israel has border control and they want white nations to lose control of their borders.
I wonder what that "muh KGB putin, jews dindu nuffin wrong" jew in this thread thinks of that. The laughably obvious hypocrisy of the cancerous worthless jewish race. They are nothing but poisonous scorpions trying to kill the frogs that keep them afloat.
>>341598 Mind you that Jesus the Nazarene himself was one of them. The history came before him and was not “stolen” from him. I don’t know where you are from, but I grew up learning that the Old Testament came before the New one by virtue of their naming scheme.
>>341516 I doubt it, or at least not now. >Why would they be behind it? Murdering Americans to create economic power vacuums and false flag to justify endless war in the middle east from which Israel benefits. >So if assassins are out to kill you, your response is just to “cope”? Yes. Cope harder. >>341530 >On one hand, there was a situation that stalled the US and world economies for years on end. They are both stalling economies. Have you not put gas in your car in the past month? >>341545 >rights only exist for as long as other people enjoy those rights. No, that's wrong you retard. >You have a right to bear arms, but only as long as you don’t use that right to deprive me of my right to live. First of all "right to live" is not in the constitution, and people who kill people already have their rights temporarily suspended during incarceration, so there's no reason to continue after they're released, if they ever are. >It is a little late No it isn't. Fuck off to your containment thread with that shit, or make another Ukraine thread if you think the fucking KGB is such a central topic.
>>341620 >Murdering Americans to create economic power vacuums and false flag to justify endless war in the middle east from which Israel benefits. But why take that great a risk? >First of all "right to live" is not in the constitution, and people who kill people already have their rights temporarily suspended during incarceration, so there's no reason to continue after they're released, if they ever are. The 9th and 10th Amendments say that the Constitution is not an exclusive document for granting rights and that any rights that are not found in the Constitution belong to the states and/or the people… and it just so happens that every state has a definition for murder, so there is indeed a right to life. Besides, the Declaration of Independence says that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are “certain unalienable rights”. >>341622 He was a rabbi.
>>341626 But your right to bear arms only exists for as long as I have a right to live. If that were not the case, the authorities would not have apprehended someone who was suspected to be the perpetrator of a train shooting yesterday.