>>372855 Lmao you pathetic horsefuckers never fail to make me laugh with your ”mlpol humor” threads. Face it. most poc will be infinitely more successful than any of you sad virgins ever will be. You are on the wrong side of history. get over it losers
>>372909 >not funny I find the 4th pic at >>372907 hilarious. Imagine to report a bug on the Zig language at GitHub because of niggers and jews. Taking into account that most developers are commies rubbing the Code of Conduct on everybody's face, the nervous breakdown that bug report caused must to of epic proportions. KEK
>>372923 I assure you there wasn't any confusion. Judy this once I would recommend you delete the specific post I'm replying to that is 372923, it didn't and doesn't help you in anyway. So please reconsider. Speaking of confusion I took a trip down memory lane here. A few minutes of watching supercharging Hasbro it came. Not only were they at the end of the alphabet, but also the butt of the joke. Generation Z is morphing into the final form the Conzoomer.
>>373170 I have to say... the 1st one is not right-wing style and not funny, I doubt any anon watches comedy. The 2nd is too complicated to follow as it mixes races not even present in Europe, I mean, the brain has to expended additional CPU cycles to understand what it is the meaning of the meme and that effort nullifies any funny content.
>>373171 >I am totally an super expert on the societies of image boards and political leanings and legalism. You must never have any humor it may do thing I don't want to you. Humor is funny due to high concentrations of Sidesaccelerant, arguably the most effective anti-blackpill media that humans can digest. Its the same substance that gives adult horse fuckers their politics, because the horse pussy they eat is rich in it. Look it up. Also, yes humor is really good for you and you can eat lots of it.
Pinkie Pie and her pink pony pussy has incredibly high amounts of concentrated humor. Since her laughter is also stored in the snowpity, despite what some so called experts may claim. The PPPPP could fill one standard size clown car per serving. As hores pussy is a complete complex psychoactive nutrient it only makes sense why any Anon can eat five dozen eggs. Even as decor is positively micro-gasm efficent. One pillow talk and what would have been a hard trip and hernia is a great discovery.
>>373439 thanks, i made a new thing. you know, it's pride month so if you have any custom flag idea i can edit this for the SPECIAL MLPOL OFFER -50% your flag here!
>>373666 Dear god, you can't do that it's too edgy too poignant. You can't just have a little pony looking at an old screen monitor at night a pony needs sleepies. Good job.
>>373848 The episode Diversityklok come to mind, but even though it was a long time since watching that, I remember these to be strongly comedic parodies on the whole topic. Maybe it's a reddit cancerchamber that the meme is referring to but I wouldn't know.
>>373018 Who says this was a recent screenshot? There really were incidents of people trying to assault those open carrying to steal their weapon and then report that they've done a "good thing" to the police.
These people really are dangerously stupid and invasively hostile. The basic realities of life and the value of borders not being understood is one of the core aspects of who they often are as people.
Ahh fuck it, might as well, it's late/early. Yes, it is a plane of flesh, but thats like seeing a bunch of trees for the forest. It is the plane of unbridled biological form, of body, of ohysical essence and manifestation. It is awesome, but by the time you've seen it you,... well you're supposed to be unmoved by such things. Its not a '101-course' plane, nut its not THAT big of a deal if you did your previous coursework. And if not, wtf are you even doing in this building??
>>380655 If the shoulders are where the world begins, and it's not a 101-course plane, then it would be in the later stages, wouldn't it? Are the neck and up meant to represent further on in the planeswalking journey?
>>380712 >if the shoulders are where the world begins By the image, the moon appears first at the throat; wanna get into that? Shoosh. Just look. And then come upon and look.
>>381013 If there's a horse that deserves to be punched, it's one of the ones that was trampling the people at Canada's Trucker protests the other year.
>>381795 Though, I'm not here to start fights here so when I say agree with the censor thing, it's not meant that I dislike the people who has compromised the thread in way that is unfair. I do liked them a lot. This is just a thing they did wrong.
>>381794 > Also the bread is censored. Just saying. The thread is not censored. It’s still in the catalog and you can still post in it. All that happened is that it hit bump limit. OP was butthurt because he wanted a new thread so he could continue his quest for endless dopamine, and mods told him no.
>>381817 If you think this is a topic that's going to be discussed on the board, it's possible but it won't be at your insistence >>381816 Nor yours. One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now, but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. If your intent was to assert "hey, maybe post a little more this way" on the board - if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
>One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now I brought it up because first OP made fun of the flat earth position. Then Boomboom, or whatever, said that he didn't think it was funny. Then someone told him to stay in his containment thread. I have to stop here, since obviously if you criticize something in a thread, then you invite hte opposition into that thread. Like, are we not allowed to disagree? But then he expressed how it was censored, which I sympathies with even if I might use a word like "compromised" instead, since otherwise it's gonna become a language debate instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON0tUATUeP8
>but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. Well, you have lost no good will, whoever you are, Anon with me. I think that you're probably a kind and smart person. I just disagree, with the mods for how they handled the issue of that thread. However, that is all there is to it. A disagreement. I hold no grudge over this neither, or at least I don't think so, towards them. There is no reason for us to be in conflict.
Sure, I can sage but don't think it's really necessary.
>>381820 <Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter. So he brings it up one correct board for questions and answers, he will be smited? Or, maybe I'm interpenetrating this wrong? Seems like there's no place to really bring this up then.
>>381821 Saging, but hoping this doesnt turn into more than it needs to, theres a rule in the rules about how mods interpret/enforce the rules, and they decided to bump lock the flat earth thread. They did so deliberately. This is not a question. Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
I'm not staff, but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
>>381823 >but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality. I guess this aims towards me. Because I was banned maybe more than five or six times, slandered, and many more ugly things, I won't insist with the matter. I just restrain myself to get "my dopamine" by shitposting here and there and that's it. If someday there is a new FlatEarth thread, it is fine with me, but I won't entertain anypony with debates.
>>381824 Of course it was aimed at you, and no that's NOT why. For fucks sake this isn't /qa/ but it amuses me to slap the taste from your mouth so here we go!
The flat earth thread was bumplocked because its not a genuine thread that I and others have painstakingly illustrated over a long stretch of time. The flat earth thread is in fact a shitty facebook-tier meme thread for smooth brains who aren't willing to engage in discussion, and either are incapable of comprehending when they've been proven wrong, or Alex Stein wannabes who enjoy irritating intelligent people with complicated and seemingly "gotcha" questions that take time and effort to deconstruct.
In either case, the flat earth thread is enough of a waste of everyone's time and effort that an exception was made, and I say this having BEEN an exception for whom there is a rule.
For any further insipid questions, EITHER fuck off to /qa/ where someone in a position of authority is likely to smite your for acting in bad faith even though technically ban evading OR fuck off to the Mlpol welcome thread and read item 4, the choice is yours BoomBoom.
>>381816 >>381814 When Elway announced that there would be no new Flat Earth thread, it was because the thread had degenerated into a cesspool of flaming and drama.
All conversation in the thread had fallen into the following cycle: 1. Meme about a flat earth is posted 2. Someone gets offended by this and responds with an argument against it 3. Meme poster gives a non-reply that doesn’t address the core of the argument 4. Person replies calls out the non-argument 5. Meme poster replies with a new meme 6. Other guy gets even more upset at the non-reply
And it deteriorates further like a plane in a death spiral. By the time the thread was closed it was site-wide drama, and there was no sign at all that things were going to become better.
Then one of the flat earth posters described the thread as “shit posting,” which to me, indicated bad faith, and that was what convinced me that it needed to be shut down.
Anyways, this discussion doesn’t belong in this thread. It belongs on /qa/.
>>381828 I don't agree with your description of the events nor do I agree with the idea that if a thread is generating drama, it needs to be dealt with. People fight all the time in every political thread on this site. Should they be compromised as well?
But yes, sorry. As made clear by context, it wasn't my intentions to bring this up. It grew organically. I won't continue posting in this thread about the subject matter from here on out. If I feel like it, I'll do it in a more relevant thread.
>>381831 While one can argue degrees of specificity, the account is accurate; BoomBoom doesn't want to argue flat earthism, he just wants to smear it on the board and laugh while autists (such as myself) regail in the idea of not having to deal with such insolence.
Perhaps boomboom would feel more comfortable on "ourchan" they ban who anyone who calls the 5G nanobot vaxx posters "schizos." I'm sure they would love to have flat earthers like yourself.
>>381835 Oh they were also talking about banning any mainstream news articles or scientific journals before I left. Nothing that could ever be used to prove you wrong. The perfect schizo safe space.
Boomboom, since THIS is the thread you chose, understand that no one is saying "Boomboom and/or flat eartherism is unwelcome" because that's not the case. Personally - and trust that I've been among your biggest critics - YOU ARE WANTED here,... but you have to give us credit where due when we make your arguments and memes look stupid
>>381828 Make note that I left the thread to not sidetrack it further before I continue.
>>381816 >>381814 Who delete my posts? It was relevant, as I explained, because it displayed, imo, a double standard of the moderation, and therefore relevant to the conversation of censorship. If it's not, just correct me. The information about these to individuals in question cannot seriously be considered private. They have both been very open with who they are. I even said that it wasn't censorship per say but more that it compromised the thread in question, only for someone to remove my posts?
>>381838 I don't really get it. You also suggested, if a bit dis-genuinely (perhaps sarcastic), to bring it up in /qa/ but you started saging, which indicates that you don't want to sidetrack the thread (which, I respect), yet I left first? Sure, if you want the last word, you got it, I can relate, but stop posting now. Take it to the pony pub thread and just leave link to there, here. Otherwise, you can't expect conversation to cease here, especially if you write: >If I have lied, may somepony correct me. Also: >Seriously, you chose this bringing it here. He did not. OP did.
>>381860 Sorry, if this come off as aggressive. I was irritated since I felt I was treated unfairly, but I'm gonna try to be open-minded to your response. As stated before, I don't dislike anyone here and I don't wish to start a fight over a disagreement.
>>381862 Appreciating your position, there's a case to be made against. That case is precipitated by the notion that we have a whole fucking board that's largely languishing.
Ahem. No. I mean yes, we do have an entire board for /qa/ issues, but we also have an ENTIRE board that is being,... not utilized to the fullest. A bit of tomfoolery isn't egregious considering the boundaries; we can worry about "proper posting" when we have enough users, imo
>>381864 Nono, that's (you) who thinks that flat earth is a real thing that needs discussing in this thread. Trust me, this is not the dopamine you are looking for
>>381866 >using a vpn Wise, but far from fool-proof. If your intention is to display your technique so it can be summarily countered, you're on the right track
>>382281 >1st pic >marriage A reminder of the original meaning of the word. Historically women were not emancipated from men's authority and marriage was a contract where a man could take factual possession of a vagina in exchange for comfort, goodies and protection. Today that contract have been subverted and men don't own that vagina while women can't take all benefits backed by threats of violence by the State.
>>382293 Rape was dealt with outside of the courts. Wife beating was dealt with outside of the courts. And then Theosophical Luciferianism and Leo Frank happened.
>>382333 >Pretty sure that's AI It might be if we consider the theory that we are living in a simulation. Women are NPCs by default and sometimes the AI cannot make them perform in a credible way,
>>382337 It's because some modern chess boards come with two queens. Why? Pawn promotion. >>382333 >>382334 >>382338 The layout is not chess, but the point that there is two of every piece except the king points to the fact that this is a real person who set this up and took the picture. The setup has the extra queen on the board. t. Looked up chess boards and contents on online shops. If it was AI the fact it didn't fuck up any of the pieces or background by mixing and matching different sets/styles would have been neat.
>communist >pronouns vary depending on whether you're higher-class than him or not >wants to be the property of other people Could Marx have possibly foreseen this?
From the JFK newly released files /pol/ thread. Nice to see confirmation that big A did survived after the war. I mean, pretty much everyone here knows the bunker suicide was BS, but hopefully it will tickle the part of the brain in the normies to the "hey, if government bullshited us about this part of history, what else did they bullshit us now?!" level of thinking.
>>382345 For that matter, how the absolute fuck do you mindrape yourself into thinking Deus Ex talking about historical facts is "qanon" and "sounds insane?" Does the liberal's capacity to update his programming to the latest establishment slop know no bounds?