Post your best!
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
328 replies | 553 files | 140 UUIDs | Page 4
1713984766_5.jpg (143.5 KB, 1085x1193, 5282a0cee2e9e1a670b14e6e4ea17360ceb84ebdb8ce80ca1295974814b408f5.jpg)
128 replies and 262 files omitted.
>>381794
> Also the bread is censored. Just saying.
The thread is not censored. It’s still in the catalog and you can still post in it. All that happened is that it hit bump limit. OP was butthurt because he wanted a new thread so he could continue his quest for endless dopamine, and mods told him no.
> Also the bread is censored. Just saying.
The thread is not censored. It’s still in the catalog and you can still post in it. All that happened is that it hit bump limit. OP was butthurt because he wanted a new thread so he could continue his quest for endless dopamine, and mods told him no.
Okay, SOME of the horspussy
>>381814
Yes, OE OP said so, why mention it here, unless its desired to have a conversation about it?
Yes, OE OP said so, why mention it here, unless its desired to have a conversation about it?
>>381816
Maybe that's a topic for /qa/, instead of the humor thread.
Maybe that's a topic for /qa/, instead of the humor thread.
>>381817
If you think this is a topic that's going to be discussed on the board, it's possible but it won't be at your insistence
>>381816
Nor yours. One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now, but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. If your intent was to assert "hey, maybe post a little more this way" on the board - if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
If you think this is a topic that's going to be discussed on the board, it's possible but it won't be at your insistence
>>381816
Nor yours. One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now, but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. If your intent was to assert "hey, maybe post a little more this way" on the board - if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
>>381818
>if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ
>One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now
I brought it up because first OP made fun of the flat earth position. Then Boomboom, or whatever, said that he didn't think it was funny. Then someone told him to stay in his containment thread. I have to stop here, since obviously if you criticize something in a thread, then you invite hte opposition into that thread. Like, are we not allowed to disagree? But then he expressed how it was censored, which I sympathies with even if I might use a word like "compromised" instead, since otherwise it's gonna become a language debate instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON0tUATUeP8
>but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so.
Well, you have lost no good will, whoever you are, Anon with me. I think that you're probably a kind and smart person. I just disagree, with the mods for how they handled the issue of that thread. However, that is all there is to it. A disagreement. I hold no grudge over this neither, or at least I don't think so, towards them. There is no reason for us to be in conflict.
>if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ
>One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now
I brought it up because first OP made fun of the flat earth position. Then Boomboom, or whatever, said that he didn't think it was funny. Then someone told him to stay in his containment thread. I have to stop here, since obviously if you criticize something in a thread, then you invite hte opposition into that thread. Like, are we not allowed to disagree? But then he expressed how it was censored, which I sympathies with even if I might use a word like "compromised" instead, since otherwise it's gonna become a language debate instead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON0tUATUeP8
>but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so.
Well, you have lost no good will, whoever you are, Anon with me. I think that you're probably a kind and smart person. I just disagree, with the mods for how they handled the issue of that thread. However, that is all there is to it. A disagreement. I hold no grudge over this neither, or at least I don't think so, towards them. There is no reason for us to be in conflict.
>>381820
<Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
So he brings it up one correct board for questions and answers, he will be smited? Or, maybe I'm interpenetrating this wrong? Seems like there's no place to really bring this up then.
<Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
So he brings it up one correct board for questions and answers, he will be smited? Or, maybe I'm interpenetrating this wrong? Seems like there's no place to really bring this up then.
>>381821
Saging, but hoping this doesnt turn into more than it needs to, theres a rule in the rules about how mods interpret/enforce the rules, and they decided to bump lock the flat earth thread. They did so deliberately. This is not a question. Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
I'm not staff, but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
Saging, but hoping this doesnt turn into more than it needs to, theres a rule in the rules about how mods interpret/enforce the rules, and they decided to bump lock the flat earth thread. They did so deliberately. This is not a question. Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
I'm not staff, but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
>>381823
>but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
I guess this aims towards me.
Because I was banned maybe more than five or six times, slandered, and many more ugly things, I won't insist with the matter. I just restrain myself to get "my dopamine" by shitposting here and there and that's it.
If someday there is a new FlatEarth thread, it is fine with me, but I won't entertain anypony with debates.
>but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
I guess this aims towards me.
Because I was banned maybe more than five or six times, slandered, and many more ugly things, I won't insist with the matter. I just restrain myself to get "my dopamine" by shitposting here and there and that's it.
If someday there is a new FlatEarth thread, it is fine with me, but I won't entertain anypony with debates.
>>381824
Of course it was aimed at you, and no that's NOT why. For fucks sake this isn't /qa/ but it amuses me to slap the taste from your mouth so here we go!
The flat earth thread was bumplocked because its not a genuine thread that I and others have painstakingly illustrated over a long stretch of time. The flat earth thread is in fact a shitty facebook-tier meme thread for smooth brains who aren't willing to engage in discussion, and either are incapable of comprehending when they've been proven wrong, or Alex Stein wannabes who enjoy irritating intelligent people with complicated and seemingly "gotcha" questions that take time and effort to deconstruct.
In either case, the flat earth thread is enough of a waste of everyone's time and effort that an exception was made, and I say this having BEEN an exception for whom there is a rule.
Of course it was aimed at you, and no that's NOT why. For fucks sake this isn't /qa/ but it amuses me to slap the taste from your mouth so here we go!
The flat earth thread was bumplocked because its not a genuine thread that I and others have painstakingly illustrated over a long stretch of time. The flat earth thread is in fact a shitty facebook-tier meme thread for smooth brains who aren't willing to engage in discussion, and either are incapable of comprehending when they've been proven wrong, or Alex Stein wannabes who enjoy irritating intelligent people with complicated and seemingly "gotcha" questions that take time and effort to deconstruct.
In either case, the flat earth thread is enough of a waste of everyone's time and effort that an exception was made, and I say this having BEEN an exception for whom there is a rule.
For any further insipid questions, EITHER fuck off to /qa/ where someone in a position of authority is likely to smite your for acting in bad faith even though technically ban evading OR fuck off to the Mlpol welcome thread and read item 4, the choice is yours BoomBoom.
What? I found that exchange quite humorous
What? I found that exchange quite humorous
>>381816
>>381814
When Elway announced that there would be no new Flat Earth thread, it was because the thread had degenerated into a cesspool of flaming and drama.
All conversation in the thread had fallen into the following cycle:
1. Meme about a flat earth is posted
2. Someone gets offended by this and responds with an argument against it
3. Meme poster gives a non-reply that doesn’t address the core of the argument
4. Person replies calls out the non-argument
5. Meme poster replies with a new meme
6. Other guy gets even more upset at the non-reply
And it deteriorates further like a plane in a death spiral. By the time the thread was closed it was site-wide drama, and there was no sign at all that things were going to become better.
Then one of the flat earth posters described the thread as “shit posting,” which to me, indicated bad faith, and that was what convinced me that it needed to be shut down.
Anyways, this discussion doesn’t belong in this thread. It belongs on /qa/.
>>381814
When Elway announced that there would be no new Flat Earth thread, it was because the thread had degenerated into a cesspool of flaming and drama.
All conversation in the thread had fallen into the following cycle:
1. Meme about a flat earth is posted
2. Someone gets offended by this and responds with an argument against it
3. Meme poster gives a non-reply that doesn’t address the core of the argument
4. Person replies calls out the non-argument
5. Meme poster replies with a new meme
6. Other guy gets even more upset at the non-reply
And it deteriorates further like a plane in a death spiral. By the time the thread was closed it was site-wide drama, and there was no sign at all that things were going to become better.
Then one of the flat earth posters described the thread as “shit posting,” which to me, indicated bad faith, and that was what convinced me that it needed to be shut down.
Anyways, this discussion doesn’t belong in this thread. It belongs on /qa/.
So this is how Batman feels when Superman shows up
>>381828
I don't agree with your description of the events nor do I agree with the idea that if a thread is generating drama, it needs to be dealt with. People fight all the time in every political thread on this site. Should they be compromised as well?
But yes, sorry. As made clear by context, it wasn't my intentions to bring this up. It grew organically. I won't continue posting in this thread about the subject matter from here on out. If I feel like it, I'll do it in a more relevant thread.
I don't agree with your description of the events nor do I agree with the idea that if a thread is generating drama, it needs to be dealt with. People fight all the time in every political thread on this site. Should they be compromised as well?
But yes, sorry. As made clear by context, it wasn't my intentions to bring this up. It grew organically. I won't continue posting in this thread about the subject matter from here on out. If I feel like it, I'll do it in a more relevant thread.
>>381831
While one can argue degrees of specificity, the account is accurate; BoomBoom doesn't want to argue flat earthism, he just wants to smear it on the board and laugh while autists (such as myself) regail in the idea of not having to deal with such insolence.
While one can argue degrees of specificity, the account is accurate; BoomBoom doesn't want to argue flat earthism, he just wants to smear it on the board and laugh while autists (such as myself) regail in the idea of not having to deal with such insolence.
Perhaps boomboom would feel more comfortable on "ourchan" they ban who anyone who calls the 5G nanobot vaxx posters "schizos." I'm sure they would love to have flat earthers like yourself.
>>381835
Oh they were also talking about banning any mainstream news articles or scientific journals before I left. Nothing that could ever be used to prove you wrong. The perfect schizo safe space.
Oh they were also talking about banning any mainstream news articles or scientific journals before I left. Nothing that could ever be used to prove you wrong. The perfect schizo safe space.
Boomboom, since THIS is the thread you chose, understand that no one is saying "Boomboom and/or flat eartherism is unwelcome" because that's not the case. Personally - and trust that I've been among your biggest critics - YOU ARE WANTED here,... but you have to give us credit where due when we make your arguments and memes look stupid
Which is every time, because dude, you're a flat earther, but lets not split hairs
>>381840
Oh no! BoomBoom called me a nigger! This vexes me so!
Seriously, you chose this bringing it here. If I have lied, may somepony correct me.
Oh no! BoomBoom called me a nigger! This vexes me so!
Seriously, you chose this bringing it here. If I have lied, may somepony correct me.
>>381828
Make note that I left the thread to not sidetrack it further before I continue.
>>381816
>>381814
Who delete my posts? It was relevant, as I explained, because it displayed, imo, a double standard of the moderation, and therefore relevant to the conversation of censorship. If it's not, just correct me. The information about these to individuals in question cannot seriously be considered private. They have both been very open with who they are. I even said that it wasn't censorship per say but more that it compromised the thread in question, only for someone to remove my posts?
>>381838
I don't really get it. You also suggested, if a bit dis-genuinely (perhaps sarcastic), to bring it up in /qa/ but you started saging, which indicates that you don't want to sidetrack the thread (which, I respect), yet I left first? Sure, if you want the last word, you got it, I can relate, but stop posting now. Take it to the pony pub thread and just leave link to there, here. Otherwise, you can't expect conversation to cease here, especially if you write:
>If I have lied, may somepony correct me.
Also:
>Seriously, you chose this bringing it here.
He did not. OP did.
Make note that I left the thread to not sidetrack it further before I continue.
>>381816
>>381814
Who delete my posts? It was relevant, as I explained, because it displayed, imo, a double standard of the moderation, and therefore relevant to the conversation of censorship. If it's not, just correct me. The information about these to individuals in question cannot seriously be considered private. They have both been very open with who they are. I even said that it wasn't censorship per say but more that it compromised the thread in question, only for someone to remove my posts?
>>381838
I don't really get it. You also suggested, if a bit dis-genuinely (perhaps sarcastic), to bring it up in /qa/ but you started saging, which indicates that you don't want to sidetrack the thread (which, I respect), yet I left first? Sure, if you want the last word, you got it, I can relate, but stop posting now. Take it to the pony pub thread and just leave link to there, here. Otherwise, you can't expect conversation to cease here, especially if you write:
>If I have lied, may somepony correct me.
Also:
>Seriously, you chose this bringing it here.
He did not. OP did.
>>381860
Sorry, if this come off as aggressive. I was irritated since I felt I was treated unfairly, but I'm gonna try to be open-minded to your response. As stated before, I don't dislike anyone here and I don't wish to start a fight over a disagreement.
Sorry, if this come off as aggressive. I was irritated since I felt I was treated unfairly, but I'm gonna try to be open-minded to your response. As stated before, I don't dislike anyone here and I don't wish to start a fight over a disagreement.
We have an entire board for /qa/ issues. Can we please not shit up the funny jokes thread with meta site rules arguments?
>>381862
Appreciating your position, there's a case to be made against. That case is precipitated by the notion that we have a whole fucking board that's largely languishing.
Ahem. No. I mean yes, we do have an entire board for /qa/ issues, but we also have an ENTIRE board that is being,... not utilized to the fullest. A bit of tomfoolery isn't egregious considering the boundaries; we can worry about "proper posting" when we have enough users, imo
Appreciating your position, there's a case to be made against. That case is precipitated by the notion that we have a whole fucking board that's largely languishing.
Ahem. No. I mean yes, we do have an entire board for /qa/ issues, but we also have an ENTIRE board that is being,... not utilized to the fullest. A bit of tomfoolery isn't egregious considering the boundaries; we can worry about "proper posting" when we have enough users, imo
>>381864
Nono, that's (you) who thinks that flat earth is a real thing that needs discussing in this thread.
Trust me, this is not the dopamine you are looking for
Nono, that's (you) who thinks that flat earth is a real thing that needs discussing in this thread.
Trust me, this is not the dopamine you are looking for
>>381866
>using a vpn
Wise, but far from fool-proof. If your intention is to display your technique so it can be summarily countered, you're on the right track
>using a vpn
Wise, but far from fool-proof. If your intention is to display your technique so it can be summarily countered, you're on the right track
1740682089.mp4 (2.5 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:00:32, 4E28E816605B697D9F24EB5580334D9E-2603356.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>382052
Kek, now it's his voice in the meme
https://youtube.com/shorts/JX3t_QgpgZw?si=BScMJaY6rgx5i9wl
Kek, now it's his voice in the meme
https://youtube.com/shorts/JX3t_QgpgZw?si=BScMJaY6rgx5i9wl
LOL
1741489080_1.webm (3.1 MB, Resolution:224x400 Length:00:00:37, 921cbb1b9a691ff36059878c9b305b0c1cf31aa9141a9f5212ce614433e14ee5.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489080_2.webm (2.6 MB, Resolution:720x540 Length:00:00:41, 1735175485772104.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489080_3.webm (1.8 MB, Resolution:720x1280 Length:00:00:23, 1734978793267047.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489080_4.webm (1.2 MB, Resolution:380x480 Length:00:00:29, 1733107484887883.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489080_5.mp4 (2.8 MB, Resolution:720x900 Length:00:00:21, 1732848069604332.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1741489182_1.mp4 (2.6 MB, Resolution:480x480 Length:00:01:29, 1732848322818215.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1741489182_2.webm (809.7 KB, Resolution:320x568 Length:00:00:14, 1732378066199315.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489182_3.webm (2.2 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:30, 1730507889610905.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489182_4.webm (3.0 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:31, 1730041626299075.webm) [play once] [loop]
1741489182_5.webm (2.5 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:19, 1728841417555383.webm) [play once] [loop]
As a rule of thumb, dumb people think they’re smart. The lack of self-awareness is outstanding
>>382281
>1st pic
>marriage
A reminder of the original meaning of the word.
Historically women were not emancipated from men's authority and marriage was a contract where a man could take factual possession of a vagina in exchange for comfort, goodies and protection.
Today that contract have been subverted and men don't own that vagina while women can't take all benefits backed by threats of violence by the State.
>1st pic
>marriage
A reminder of the original meaning of the word.
Historically women were not emancipated from men's authority and marriage was a contract where a man could take factual possession of a vagina in exchange for comfort, goodies and protection.
Today that contract have been subverted and men don't own that vagina while women can't take all benefits backed by threats of violence by the State.
1741970415.gif (882.1 KB, 500x280, 53ba181a9ca2c3a64195a721548d7c74.gif)
>the "I'm so oppressed because I can't beat and rape women like a nigger" boomer is back
>>382293
Rape was dealt with outside of the courts.
Wife beating was dealt with outside of the courts.
And then Theosophical Luciferianism and Leo Frank happened.
Rape was dealt with outside of the courts.
Wife beating was dealt with outside of the courts.
And then Theosophical Luciferianism and Leo Frank happened.
1742192412_1.jpg (179.2 KB, 470x550, dc283b49-e3a1-4650-b02b-cd49dddce617.jpeg)
1742192412_2.jpg (196.1 KB, 1057x768, 975a04b3-f2ab-4d10-967a-b03758e12654.jpeg)
1742192412_3.jpg (125.9 KB, 415x550, 72ac1438-14e1-45f8-8dfb-5d20a034e4d1.jpeg)
1742192412_4.jpg (173.5 KB, 788x1024, be909209-bca6-4b34-8019-bcff91d89251.jpeg)
1742192412_5.png (590.9 KB, 680x680, 98c855bf-8577-4563-955b-3d8a7923d03a.png)
>>382333
>Pretty sure that's AI
It might be if we consider the theory that we are living in a simulation. Women are NPCs by default and sometimes the AI cannot make them perform in a credible way,
>Pretty sure that's AI
It might be if we consider the theory that we are living in a simulation. Women are NPCs by default and sometimes the AI cannot make them perform in a credible way,
>>382335
>ook at the pieces.
I did and is totally credible that the woman has not the thinnest idea how to play chess.
>ook at the pieces.
I did and is totally credible that the woman has not the thinnest idea how to play chess.
>>382337
It's because some modern chess boards come with two queens.
Why?
Pawn promotion.
>>382333
>>382334
>>382338
The layout is not chess, but the point that there is two of every piece except the king points to the fact that this is a real person who set this up and took the picture.
The setup has the extra queen on the board.
t. Looked up chess boards and contents on online shops.
If it was AI the fact it didn't fuck up any of the pieces or background by mixing and matching different sets/styles would have been neat.
It's because some modern chess boards come with two queens.
Why?
Pawn promotion.
>>382333
>>382334
>>382338
The layout is not chess, but the point that there is two of every piece except the king points to the fact that this is a real person who set this up and took the picture.
The setup has the extra queen on the board.
t. Looked up chess boards and contents on online shops.
If it was AI the fact it didn't fuck up any of the pieces or background by mixing and matching different sets/styles would have been neat.
>communist
>pronouns vary depending on whether you're higher-class than him or not
>wants to be the property of other people
Could Marx have possibly foreseen this?
>pronouns vary depending on whether you're higher-class than him or not
>wants to be the property of other people
Could Marx have possibly foreseen this?
From the JFK newly released files /pol/ thread. Nice to see confirmation that big A did survived after the war. I mean, pretty much everyone here knows the bunker suicide was BS, but hopefully it will tickle the part of the brain in the normies to the "hey, if government bullshited us about this part of history, what else did they bullshit us now?!" level of thinking.
>>382345
For that matter, how the absolute fuck do you mindrape yourself into thinking Deus Ex talking about historical facts is "qanon" and "sounds insane?" Does the liberal's capacity to update his programming to the latest establishment slop know no bounds?
For that matter, how the absolute fuck do you mindrape yourself into thinking Deus Ex talking about historical facts is "qanon" and "sounds insane?" Does the liberal's capacity to update his programming to the latest establishment slop know no bounds?
>>382353
>ew this game reminds me of qanon like deus ex
>time to make a wiki for it ^_^
I'm starting to suspect that trannies aren't sentient.
>ew this game reminds me of qanon like deus ex
>time to make a wiki for it ^_^
I'm starting to suspect that trannies aren't sentient.
>>382454
Now now, you're not appreciating the cultural heritage of selling cow urine. Selling cow urine to unsuspecting idiots has been a generational phenomenon in India, far outpacing the propensity to shit in the streets. You sound racist
Now now, you're not appreciating the cultural heritage of selling cow urine. Selling cow urine to unsuspecting idiots has been a generational phenomenon in India, far outpacing the propensity to shit in the streets. You sound racist
>>382432
>5th pic
Without a vertical scale on that graph, this is a lot less meaningful that it might otherwise be.
>5th pic
Without a vertical scale on that graph, this is a lot less meaningful that it might otherwise be.
1743467684_1.jpg (42.1 KB, 700x474, 1-week-trucks-honking-royalty.jpeg)
1743467684_3.jpg (35.0 KB, 831x1024, 70 inch toquisha no remote - craigslist.jpg)
1743467684_5.png (198.9 KB, 477x525, my fbi agent - when i unlock my phone.png)
>>382496
I so want to shit on you outright for this. Having not been present but having been giving a thorough rundown of the events leading up to it, you had earned a ban long before you got one, that was more the straw that broke the camel's back.
I so want to shit on you outright for this. Having not been present but having been giving a thorough rundown of the events leading up to it, you had earned a ban long before you got one, that was more the straw that broke the camel's back.
>382496
>>382499
While your position is agreeable, its the anniversary. Don't make me re-affect the homo-horse-hangout
While your position is agreeable, its the anniversary. Don't make me re-affect the homo-horse-hangout
I will, purely out of spite. Calm your tits
"How would you feel today, if you didn't eat breakfast yesterday?"
"Hungry enough to eat a horse."
"Hungry enough to eat a horse."
If you own a Tesla, this is your chance.
Shifting dating standards. Boys are getting redpilled fast.
>>382615
>I don't get Pic 5. Spoonfeed please?
I have an idea trying to guess it. The device in the middle is a charger, the left weight is being charged and on its top is beginning to show an eye, which I guess, will become 2 full eyes as shown on the right weight.
Anyway, it takes too many brain CPU cycles to figure out.
>I don't get Pic 5. Spoonfeed please?
I have an idea trying to guess it. The device in the middle is a charger, the left weight is being charged and on its top is beginning to show an eye, which I guess, will become 2 full eyes as shown on the right weight.
Anyway, it takes too many brain CPU cycles to figure out.
Stock people attribute all their wins to their own brilliance, and all their losses to evil outsiders.
>>382693
>2nd pic
As marriage is a thing of the past, turbo charged simping has taken its place, look at onlyfools and tell me I'm wrong.
>4th pic
Definitely, that's a pajeet.
>2nd pic
As marriage is a thing of the past, turbo charged simping has taken its place, look at onlyfools and tell me I'm wrong.
>4th pic
Definitely, that's a pajeet.
1744018081.jpg (474.1 KB, 1431x1028, my-little-pony-Roseluck-minor-426349llll5.jpeg)
>>382695
>As marriage is a thing of the past
Check the following shit out.
An open marriage, obviously, goes wrong.
>As marriage is a thing of the past
Check the following shit out.
An open marriage, obviously, goes wrong.
>>382695
>marriage is a thing of the past
People still get married, just not as often as before.
>turbo charged simping has taken its place
Hardly.
>look at onlyfools and tell me I'm wrong
Onlyfools is no substitute for marriage, and I'm sure it would still exist even without declining marriage rates, because it is caused by more than just that.
Both are products of modern society going to shit, but one is not the product of the other.
>marriage is a thing of the past
People still get married, just not as often as before.
>turbo charged simping has taken its place
Hardly.
>look at onlyfools and tell me I'm wrong
Onlyfools is no substitute for marriage, and I'm sure it would still exist even without declining marriage rates, because it is caused by more than just that.
Both are products of modern society going to shit, but one is not the product of the other.
>>382720
It might imply also a pimp.
Anyway, there is freewill as an expression of the spirit, which means those kids are very comfy with dicks in their asses, as also there is the obvious and uncomfortable detail that slavery is a choice.
It might imply also a pimp.
Anyway, there is freewill as an expression of the spirit, which means those kids are very comfy with dicks in their asses, as also there is the obvious and uncomfortable detail that slavery is a choice.
>>382725
The stock market is probably going to settle down in a few months anyway. These kinds of faggots always overreact to every little thing.
The stock market is probably going to settle down in a few months anyway. These kinds of faggots always overreact to every little thing.
>>382731
>These kinds of faggots always overreact to every little thing
I hope those faggots got their pensions gone in smoke.
>These kinds of faggots always overreact to every little thing
I hope those faggots got their pensions gone in smoke.
>>382725
Muh stonks have zero connection to the broader economy, just as muh GDP has no connection to the lives of ordinary people. Generations of mass immigration mean there is a complete disconnect between GDP, muh make line go up, that Boomers and (((banksters))) care about, and per-capita GDP, which affects your life directly, that's been in free-fall since Nixon ended the gold standard in 1971.
Leaving aside the questions about GDP, which is as currently calculated 100% fake and gay anyway--how much money the hedge fund of Shekelberg & Goldstein made this afternoon by shorting the US dollar against the Chinese yuan should not count as economic activity at all, and certainly has no bearing on how many artillery shells the US can manufacture in a month, which is what comparisons of economy are supposed to mean--I am convinced that decoupling the US from China is worth it, even if it craters muh stonks forever and every Boomer in the country who doesn't throw himself off a rooftop ends up taking out the false teeth to give gummy blowjobs in a bus station to live. Leaving aside the moral stench of making the United States of America more dependent upon slave labor than the Confederacy was, there is also the fact that if we are buying boots for our soldiers from China, that means China has veto power over every aspect of our foreign policy and we're not really sovereign at all, not in any way that matters. Boomers love this state of affairs because it allows them to buy twenty houses to rent and thirty more to flip and take one more round-the-world singles cruise before they kick the bucket. Banksters love the way things are because they can buy stock in companies that buy novelty rubber dogshit made by slave labor in a Chinese concentration camp and resell it at a 40% markup.
What's the old joke? The Boomer, holding a gun with two bullets, was in a room with a traitor and an enemy and his grandson. So, of course, he shot his grandson twice. Fuck Boomers. Fuck muh stonks. Fuck the (((bankers))). Burn it all down and start over.
>>382740
So much this.
Also, isn't it really curious that self-proclaimed "socialists" are pissing their pants because the giant multinational megacorporations they claim they want to destroy are taking a 1% haircut? How very odd.
Muh stonks have zero connection to the broader economy, just as muh GDP has no connection to the lives of ordinary people. Generations of mass immigration mean there is a complete disconnect between GDP, muh make line go up, that Boomers and (((banksters))) care about, and per-capita GDP, which affects your life directly, that's been in free-fall since Nixon ended the gold standard in 1971.
Leaving aside the questions about GDP, which is as currently calculated 100% fake and gay anyway--how much money the hedge fund of Shekelberg & Goldstein made this afternoon by shorting the US dollar against the Chinese yuan should not count as economic activity at all, and certainly has no bearing on how many artillery shells the US can manufacture in a month, which is what comparisons of economy are supposed to mean--I am convinced that decoupling the US from China is worth it, even if it craters muh stonks forever and every Boomer in the country who doesn't throw himself off a rooftop ends up taking out the false teeth to give gummy blowjobs in a bus station to live. Leaving aside the moral stench of making the United States of America more dependent upon slave labor than the Confederacy was, there is also the fact that if we are buying boots for our soldiers from China, that means China has veto power over every aspect of our foreign policy and we're not really sovereign at all, not in any way that matters. Boomers love this state of affairs because it allows them to buy twenty houses to rent and thirty more to flip and take one more round-the-world singles cruise before they kick the bucket. Banksters love the way things are because they can buy stock in companies that buy novelty rubber dogshit made by slave labor in a Chinese concentration camp and resell it at a 40% markup.
What's the old joke? The Boomer, holding a gun with two bullets, was in a room with a traitor and an enemy and his grandson. So, of course, he shot his grandson twice. Fuck Boomers. Fuck muh stonks. Fuck the (((bankers))). Burn it all down and start over.
>>382740
So much this.
Also, isn't it really curious that self-proclaimed "socialists" are pissing their pants because the giant multinational megacorporations they claim they want to destroy are taking a 1% haircut? How very odd.
>>382768
>Muh stonks have zero connection to the broader economy
Worse than that, the Nasdaq (the "stock exchange") is PURELY a listing of the most valued PUBLIC funds and portfolios.
Meaning, everything on the Nasdaq was A. already sold from it's original owner (the ones responsible for the success) and B. is NOW owned almost exclusively by jews who want to take it's value for all it's worth, without providing any ACTUAL value! Oh, you thought the Nasdaq was a measure of success? Lol! The Nasdaq is a measure of corporations who sold out and haven't gone under YET!
>Muh stonks have zero connection to the broader economy
Worse than that, the Nasdaq (the "stock exchange") is PURELY a listing of the most valued PUBLIC funds and portfolios.
Meaning, everything on the Nasdaq was A. already sold from it's original owner (the ones responsible for the success) and B. is NOW owned almost exclusively by jews who want to take it's value for all it's worth, without providing any ACTUAL value! Oh, you thought the Nasdaq was a measure of success? Lol! The Nasdaq is a measure of corporations who sold out and haven't gone under YET!
>>382770
Just to give an example, back in the late 90's my class was doing one of those "stock exchange" assignments. I went traditional conservative, and bought almost exclusively government contracts (boeing, ratheon, etc.; I made a modest 10% yield. One of my classmates bought Viagra, which had just gone public. He sold soon after, and won the class competition. We started with a moderate 100k.
He ended the 'simulation' with over 10 million, because he bought stock right when the company went public, sold off to investors, and was probably very cross that he didn't have any actual money riding on the deal. Suffice it to say, all the people who bought into Viagra when he was selling lost their shirts.
Just to give an example, back in the late 90's my class was doing one of those "stock exchange" assignments. I went traditional conservative, and bought almost exclusively government contracts (boeing, ratheon, etc.; I made a modest 10% yield. One of my classmates bought Viagra, which had just gone public. He sold soon after, and won the class competition. We started with a moderate 100k.
He ended the 'simulation' with over 10 million, because he bought stock right when the company went public, sold off to investors, and was probably very cross that he didn't have any actual money riding on the deal. Suffice it to say, all the people who bought into Viagra when he was selling lost their shirts.
>>382707
>People still get married, just not as often as before.
So true. So true as simping is still rampant.
>People still get married, just not as often as before.
So true. So true as simping is still rampant.
>>382707
>People still get married, just not as often as before.
Yeah, but an interesting detail; most men who now get married are castrated and emasculated in the marxist university system.
>People still get married, just not as often as before.
Yeah, but an interesting detail; most men who now get married are castrated and emasculated in the marxist university system.
1744368235_1.png (1.6 MB, 1420x1420, B33671CF948442E019E86F01C678BA0D-1712082.png)
>>382797
Let's not, because such topics have entire fucking forums and imageboards dedicated specifically to quarantine them. Not every thread on every board needs to be denigraded with terminally online incel blackpill truthnukes about how females only want to fuck the top 0.01% of guys, while simultaneously being mega whores.
Let's not, because such topics have entire fucking forums and imageboards dedicated specifically to quarantine them. Not every thread on every board needs to be denigraded with terminally online incel blackpill truthnukes about how females only want to fuck the top 0.01% of guys, while simultaneously being mega whores.
1744418638_3.png (296.5 KB, 500x271, technology-3d_printer-3d_printing-technological_advancement-technical_advances-girlfriend-rron2195_low.png)
>>382809
fuck I know millennials that look like that NOW
especially women, 30 years old but they look 55+
fuck I know millennials that look like that NOW
especially women, 30 years old but they look 55+
A Safe Space for Men.
>>382825
It will be interesting to see you (not) attempt to justify this post, especially the excluded content. Is this a form of self-sabotage, where one shits where they sleep because there's a degree of maladjustment?
It will be interesting to see you (not) attempt to justify this post, especially the excluded content. Is this a form of self-sabotage, where one shits where they sleep because there's a degree of maladjustment?
>>382830
People in the West are so used to niggers' retarded antics that it is no longer funny and spawns contempt and negro fatigue instead of ridicule. Kinda racial separation is due,
People in the West are so used to niggers' retarded antics that it is no longer funny and spawns contempt and negro fatigue instead of ridicule. Kinda racial separation is due,
>>382820
I think zoomers somehow ended up worse. I see girls in their 20s that look older than some late 30s millennials. It's crazy. Not sure if its the increase in plant based diets/vaccines or just the style, but they don't look good.
I think zoomers somehow ended up worse. I see girls in their 20s that look older than some late 30s millennials. It's crazy. Not sure if its the increase in plant based diets/vaccines or just the style, but they don't look good.
>>382832
Here's something alot of Gen X either hasn't mustered the nerve to mention, or hasn't bothered to notice.
This might sound like an attempt to shift the blame and for many there is a case to be made, but let's address the issue of Boomers.
Gen X knows, we're the least removed from Boomers. It wasn't enough that they knew better than anyone when they were in their hayday, if you ask them they STILL know better than everyone, nevermind what happens to the economy. And this mentality has permeated into the younger generations.
Having grown up under Boomers, Gen X KNOWS they're full of shit, and did their due diligence to get out from under them before starting families and shit. So Gen X goes off and has families, only for the Boomers to come back to influence their grandchildren. If you thought the cliche of "grandparents spoiling their grandchildren" was bad BEFORE, imagine how bad it gets under a generation that's perfectly okay with sacrificing every other generation for their precious retirement.
And who are their grandchildren?
Here's something alot of Gen X either hasn't mustered the nerve to mention, or hasn't bothered to notice.
This might sound like an attempt to shift the blame and for many there is a case to be made, but let's address the issue of Boomers.
Gen X knows, we're the least removed from Boomers. It wasn't enough that they knew better than anyone when they were in their hayday, if you ask them they STILL know better than everyone, nevermind what happens to the economy. And this mentality has permeated into the younger generations.
Having grown up under Boomers, Gen X KNOWS they're full of shit, and did their due diligence to get out from under them before starting families and shit. So Gen X goes off and has families, only for the Boomers to come back to influence their grandchildren. If you thought the cliche of "grandparents spoiling their grandchildren" was bad BEFORE, imagine how bad it gets under a generation that's perfectly okay with sacrificing every other generation for their precious retirement.
And who are their grandchildren?
>>382832
>I see girls in their 20s that look older than some late 30s millennials
Riding the cock carousel INTENSIFIES.
>I see girls in their 20s that look older than some late 30s millennials
Riding the cock carousel INTENSIFIES.
>>382839
that and they spend thousands on cosmetic surgery and makeup to wind up looking like a 50 year old cougar when they are like 25 LOL and the drugs and alcohol doesn't help either
that and they spend thousands on cosmetic surgery and makeup to wind up looking like a 50 year old cougar when they are like 25 LOL and the drugs and alcohol doesn't help either
>>382839
This is a poor example. The leftimage clearly denotes aspects of the cock carosel, even if not as lengthy as the right image. Nice try, but both are the same degenerate wamen and both will experience all the fruits that that lifestyle offers
This is a poor example. The leftimage clearly denotes aspects of the cock carosel, even if not as lengthy as the right image. Nice try, but both are the same degenerate wamen and both will experience all the fruits that that lifestyle offers
>>382798
Women cannot serve in war and therefore are not entitled to the vote. Simple as.
>>382832
They are lied to about nutrition. They eat salads with zero macro nutrients because (((doctors))) say it's healthy. Partying every weekend, fucking random guys, throwing who knows what chemicals on their face.
Animal testing is used for makeup because it's literally random chemicals.
>This lipstick gave the rabbit kidney failure, try the next chemical!
Women cannot serve in war and therefore are not entitled to the vote. Simple as.
>>382832
They are lied to about nutrition. They eat salads with zero macro nutrients because (((doctors))) say it's healthy. Partying every weekend, fucking random guys, throwing who knows what chemicals on their face.
Animal testing is used for makeup because it's literally random chemicals.
>This lipstick gave the rabbit kidney failure, try the next chemical!
>>383261
>This is a poor example.
Yeah, your right. But for legal reasons is not possible to post picture of her when she was 12 year old.
>This is a poor example.
Yeah, your right. But for legal reasons is not possible to post picture of her when she was 12 year old.
>>382580
>>382615
>>382619
Image 5 is the "jeet shaker"
Anon has annoying jeet neighbors, he set up a timer that runs the jeet shaker for exactly the amount of time allowed in the noise code, and then it runs again, all day long, vibrating the shit out of his annoying jeet neighbors and driving them insane.
>>382615
>>382619
Image 5 is the "jeet shaker"
Anon has annoying jeet neighbors, he set up a timer that runs the jeet shaker for exactly the amount of time allowed in the noise code, and then it runs again, all day long, vibrating the shit out of his annoying jeet neighbors and driving them insane.
>>386067
Those images would all be pretty well received in a /pol/ humor thread. I don't see what the problem is.
Those images would all be pretty well received in a /pol/ humor thread. I don't see what the problem is.
>>382833
I think this poisoning against Boomers is a jewish psyop. I mean, think about it. Do we get to decide how things work? No, some jew just tells them what to do and we're stuck dealing with it. I don't see how it could've been any different for the Boomers. People act like they had monopoly on legislature, but they had to deal with the Greatest Gen clocking out because they were old and the world was just too different now, the Silent Gen wanting to just keep their head down and not make waves because they were stunted by The Depression, and Gen X being aloof little space cadets going: "Nothing even matters, dude. It's just Sex, Drugs, and Rock N' Roll!" The only way they could get their voices heard was by learning to be Karens and throwing a shitfit anytime someone tried to fuck with them, and it worked for the most part.
This is all because they want to sever the generations. If people moved in with their Boomers they could get on the same page and you'd have Boomers, Millennials, and Zoomers all voting the same way for the same things. You'd also have Boomers imparting wisdom onto them about the way things used to work. Part of the jews plans relies on being able to feign stupidity anytime you suggest change and claiming it's logistically impossible but Boomers can tell you that we used to do it that way and how it worked on a day to day level which is knowledge the jews want to die with them. Boomers would also be a lot more conscious about staying out of debt and passing on their houses to the younger generation if you lived with them (something that would be very hard for jews to wrestle away from you if you already have an established residence there and a Will) and you'd be able to keep them away from jews and Pajeets trying to trick them into debt or gambling away your inheritance. There is a conscious effort to drive the generations apart in this country so we don't unite against the jews and coordinate our efforts with each other.
I think this poisoning against Boomers is a jewish psyop. I mean, think about it. Do we get to decide how things work? No, some jew just tells them what to do and we're stuck dealing with it. I don't see how it could've been any different for the Boomers. People act like they had monopoly on legislature, but they had to deal with the Greatest Gen clocking out because they were old and the world was just too different now, the Silent Gen wanting to just keep their head down and not make waves because they were stunted by The Depression, and Gen X being aloof little space cadets going: "Nothing even matters, dude. It's just Sex, Drugs, and Rock N' Roll!" The only way they could get their voices heard was by learning to be Karens and throwing a shitfit anytime someone tried to fuck with them, and it worked for the most part.
This is all because they want to sever the generations. If people moved in with their Boomers they could get on the same page and you'd have Boomers, Millennials, and Zoomers all voting the same way for the same things. You'd also have Boomers imparting wisdom onto them about the way things used to work. Part of the jews plans relies on being able to feign stupidity anytime you suggest change and claiming it's logistically impossible but Boomers can tell you that we used to do it that way and how it worked on a day to day level which is knowledge the jews want to die with them. Boomers would also be a lot more conscious about staying out of debt and passing on their houses to the younger generation if you lived with them (something that would be very hard for jews to wrestle away from you if you already have an established residence there and a Will) and you'd be able to keep them away from jews and Pajeets trying to trick them into debt or gambling away your inheritance. There is a conscious effort to drive the generations apart in this country so we don't unite against the jews and coordinate our efforts with each other.
>>386406
>you'd have Boomers, Millennials, and Zoomers
Stopped reading right there. Do you see what's missing in your statement? That's fine, that's how it ALWAYS has been for gen X
>you'd have Boomers, Millennials, and Zoomers
Stopped reading right there. Do you see what's missing in your statement? That's fine, that's how it ALWAYS has been for gen X
>>386406
>I think this poisoning against Boomers is a jewish psyop
May be. But boomers deserve the hate.
>I think this poisoning against Boomers is a jewish psyop
May be. But boomers deserve the hate.
>>386408
Gen X is in their 50's. If they're in a spot where they don't have a house and need to move in with their parents they should've done it already.
Gen X is in their 50's. If they're in a spot where they don't have a house and need to move in with their parents they should've done it already.
>>386408
Gen X are the biggest generational attentionfags, most people lump them in with boomers and they HATE not being mentioned by name. So that's why I always do that.
Gen X are the biggest generational attentionfags, most people lump them in with boomers and they HATE not being mentioned by name. So that's why I always do that.
The cuck got served.
1745563144.webm (2.8 MB, Resolution:1920x1080 Length:00:00:25, Jonny Buchardt - Sieg Heil ｜ Appearance at the Cologne carnival,1973 [Ang6Fw9Ff2k].webm) [play once] [loop]
![Jonny Buchardt - Sieg Heil ｜ Appearance at the Cologne carnival,1973 [Ang6Fw9Ff2k].webm](/images/thumb/0A851AC3B3CD612A856A80A11F21EC3C-2942568.png)
1745870733_1.jpg (43.3 KB, 905x427, 3b6a0a0c-630c-4766-b3cc-f1c09b4770db.jpeg)
1745870733_2.png (2.0 MB, 1719x1154, cbd74d3e-76ca-453f-b4e1-1cc566069606.png)
1745870733_3.jpg (219.4 KB, 1125x1594, f4c54ce6-b249-47f0-9692-e581e3a380f4.jpeg)
1745870733_4.jpg (400.7 KB, 1070x952, 6e2a631c-509f-4b79-b820-550a77682470.jpeg)
1745870733_5.jpg (211.7 KB, 972x1262, c0e24375-9274-43c0-809e-e36f0ac29583.jpeg)
>>388521
They've been pretty insane on many occasions over the last twenty years. This kind of staged event is worryingly plausible.
They've been pretty insane on many occasions over the last twenty years. This kind of staged event is worryingly plausible.
1745873420_2.webm (3.0 MB, Resolution:720x576 Length:00:00:36, 1740241256752834.webm) [play once] [loop]
President Trump just took away their funding.
>https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/ending-taxpayer-subsidization-of-biased-media/
Anyone want to hire a broadcast engineer?
>https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/05/ending-taxpayer-subsidization-of-biased-media/
Anyone want to hire a broadcast engineer?
>>386406
>Divide and Conquer Through Generational Warfare
The elite amplify generational divides (Boomers vs. Zoomers, etc.) to:
-Distract from class solidarity.
-Blame crises on age groups (e.g., "Boomers ruined the economy!").
-Prevent unified resistance to wealth/power inequality.
Result: Young fight old instead of oligarchs
>Divide and Conquer Through Generational Warfare
The elite amplify generational divides (Boomers vs. Zoomers, etc.) to:
-Distract from class solidarity.
-Blame crises on age groups (e.g., "Boomers ruined the economy!").
-Prevent unified resistance to wealth/power inequality.
Result: Young fight old instead of oligarchs
>>389433
That reminds me of the guy who was approached by a hooker who told him, "Baby, I'll do anything you want for $300."
"Wonderful!" he exclaimed, handing her the money. "Paint my house!"
That reminds me of the guy who was approached by a hooker who told him, "Baby, I'll do anything you want for $300."
"Wonderful!" he exclaimed, handing her the money. "Paint my house!"
1746931794_1.webm (3.1 MB, Resolution:400x400 Length:00:03:39, 1739617653599061.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746931794_2.webm (5.8 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:57, 1739629078042497.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746931794_3.webm (3.2 MB, Resolution:715x400 Length:00:03:57, 1739716016071008.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746931794_4.webm (3.1 MB, Resolution:715x400 Length:00:03:21, 1739716199683890.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746931794_5.mp4 (3.7 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:03:40, 1742798486072104.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Bringing Moonman back
1746932607_1.webm (5.3 MB, Resolution:872x480 Length:00:04:36, 1739716364129986.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746932607_2.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:854x480 Length:00:02:08, 1739716425485968.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1746932607_3.mp4 (5.9 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:03:53, 1739833991346382.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1746933079_1.mp4 (4.8 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:03:21, 1746254596087010.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1746933079_2.mp4 (3.4 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:03:02, 1743264939878453.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1746933079_3.webm (3.6 MB, Resolution:426x240 Length:00:01:12, 1742877116826296.webm) [play once] [loop]
1746933079_4.mp4 (3.8 MB, Resolution:360x360 Length:00:02:15, 1743214420031310.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1747048998.mp4 (4.5 MB, Resolution:1440x810 Length:00:02:10, 1747006222070062.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1747130506_2.mp4 (3.2 MB, Resolution:620x412 Length:00:02:38, moon_in_the_hood.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1747130506_3.webm (7.7 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:03:42, three_klansmen.webm) [play once] [loop]
1747130852.webm (2.4 MB, Resolution:620x412 Length:00:02:38, moon_in_the_hood.webm) [play once] [loop]
128 replies and 262 files omitted.
[View All] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts]Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-328] [Next]
328 replies | 553 files | 140 UUIDs | Page 4